Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The negative principles are shown in italics. These negative principles are just as
valuable to us as our positive principles. eg. If we face a lion with all trust and no fear,
then we are dead.
If we get too much challenge then fear overrides trust and we develop negative concerns
which starts the rumination cycle of:
Failure-Shame-Blame-Avoid.
If support equals challenge then the best outcome is achieved, because the cycle is:
If we receive too much support then we get out of balance because it becomes about
getting my needs meet and less consideration for others. The false positive [shown in
italics] cause the following outcomes:
Cognitively, the balance of support and challenge provides for sustained growth because
both growth and risk are assessed in advanced.
If cognitive challenge is developed in the planning stage of goal setting then this will
take in to account of the potential risk which may arise, which will help create and
environment for flow. Examples of cognitive support and challenge are shown in the
chart below:
It is normal practice, when developing a plan, cognitively you assess risk [challenge]
and provide a strategy to return to balance. Emotionally, you should be doing the same
and plan how to get back into balance.
At the basic level we have needs and wants. This is built into our human nature and
drives our comparative thinking [IQ]. When we achieve our wants and needs, we want
more. However, if we consistently fail to get our needs and wants met then we develop
negative comparative thinking, resulting in negative feelings [EQ]
To control our human nature we have a conscience which controls how we get our
needs and wants met. Out of our conscience grows our principles of trust, respect,
acceptance, etc. Therefore, at the basic level of human behavior there are two opposing
forces at work in negative situations, namely, comparative thinking and principle
thinking.
In cognitive principle theory the two highest principles are unconditional acceptance
and unconditional giving, which are the direct opposites of comparative thinking related
to achieving goals. Goals are based on a comparison between “where I am” and “where
I want to be”. Goals are driven by fear of a bad goal and greed for a good goal.
Unconditional acceptance is self acceptance of strengths and weaknesses and there is no
goal, so we overcome our fear. Unconditional giving is where you give without wanting
anything back and there is no goal, so we overcome our greed.
By giving into negative thinking you weaken yourself. Spiritual principles are available
to us to overcome our human nature weakness.
We have spoken about two of them, namely unconditional acceptance and unconditional
giving.
If you get caught up in too much challenge through negative thinking, then switch to the
spiritual principle of suffering:
Suffer and grow courage, patience, self control. Don’t use negative comparative
thinking to suffer and blame yourself, others or circumstances.
If you do blame others or yourself, then use the spiritual principle of forgiveness. That
is, split the person from their behavior and forgive the person, but put the behavior aside
to be dealt with by god, karma or what ever else you believe in.
If you can't achieve your goal, then use the spiritual principle of hope. A goal requires a
pathway leading to an outcome, whereas hope requires no pathway, just trust in your
intuition that you will achieve the outcome you desire and the pathway will be shown to
you.
Sign in Join
Robert McInnes
Fear & Anger Management Counselor Follow
207 articles
0 comments
Sign up Help Center About Careers Advertising Talent Solutions Sales Solutions Small Business Mobile Language Online Learning
Search Jobs Directories Members Pulse Topics Companies Universities Titles ProFinder
© 2018 User Agreement Privacy Policy Community Guidelines Cookie Policy Copyright Policy Unsubscribe