Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Provocation as Defense
Name
University
Date
Course
Provocation as Defense 2
Introduction
Kenya is among the Anglophone countries. Therefore, English common law is highly
applicable in the country. In English Common Law, the provocation is a particular defense which
is only available for murder crime as defined under section 3 of the Homicide Act 1957.
Provocation is denoted as a situation in which a person is charged with murder, and there is
evidence from which a court can find a person was provoked by things done and said, which
make such personal loss his self-control and that a judicious man would have conducted himself
as defendant did in the situations1. In this instance, the defendant may be found guilty of
manslaughter and not murder. In the Kenyan law, the provocation is provided for in section 207
The term “provocation” means and includes, except as hereinafter stated, any
power of self-control and to induce him to commit an assault of the kind which
the person charged committed upon the person by whom the act or insult is done
or offered.2
The term provocation is defined in section 2008 of the Penal Code as:
1
Fitz-Gibbon, Kate, Homicide Law Reform, Gender and the Provocation Defence: A Comparative
2
The Penal Code (Cap 63), s207.
Provocation as Defense 3
1. The term “provocation” means and includes, except as hereinafter stated, any
power of self- control and to induce him to commit an assault of the kind which
the person charged committed upon the person by whom the act or insult is done
or offered.4
the presence of another to a person who is under the immediate care of that
other, or to whom the latter stands in any such relation as aforesaid, the former is
successfulness of later minimize the obligation to manslaughter. According to the Kenya Penal
Code, killing on provocation happens when an individual unlawfully kills under the situations
which would constitute murder.7 However, the circumstance to which such will constitute to
court of law function as a partial defense where it minimise what otherwise would be murder to
the issues of whether the defendant made the necessary intent needed for other offenses.
However, in this situation, the defense is applicable only after the murder has been proven. The
evidence of provocation does not disprove the fault or act element of the crime of murder. This
The case of OKWANY & ANOTHER VS REPUBLIC [2005] 1 KLR 833, the decision of
the Court of appeal held that there was a provocation in which the accused, the confronted, and
another equipped with a crude weapon (rungu) uprooted crops from a disputed land which were
planted by the defendant.8 From this case, the murder was minimized to manslaughter because
the Court of Appeal found that the case raised an issue of provocation, which was brought forth
by the lawyer of the accused. The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge did not put into
consideration the issues of provocation.9 Therefore, the conviction for murder was not sustained.
Consequently, the plaintiff was found guilty of manslaughter, which was contrary to s202 and
section 205 of the Kenyan Penal Code. The plaintiff was liable to imprisonment for ten years.
In another case Benson Mbugua Kariuki v. Republic [1979] eKLR 29, the Court of
Appeal found that there was enough evidence of provocation of the defendant personally, where
the burden laid upon the prosecution to disprove that provocation and which failed to so.
8
OKWANY & ANOTHER VS REPUBLIC [2005] 1 KLR 833
9
Ibid.
Provocation as Defense 5
Therefore, the accused used the provocation as a defense. This succeeded, and the Court of
Appeal minimized the murder under Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Kenyan Penal
Regarding the specific circumstance of the Republic v Martin Kinyua Nancy [2016]
eKLR 14, provocation, used as defense, enhanced the benefit of the appellant against criminal
charges, 10 and the information of the murder was reduced to manslaughter under Section 202 as
read with Section 205 of the Penal Code.11 In both cases, the appellant has provoked a reasonable
person for instance, in the case Mbugua Kariuki v. Republic [1979] eKLR 29; the appellant was
provoked by the deceased to the point that the deceased was reluctant to vacate the premises after
raping and robbing the appellant’s wife.12 Even after the appellant ordered the deceased to leave,
He was still reluctant, which provoked the appellant and did not give a room for the appellant to
cool off. This was extremely essence of provocation, which the trial judge failed to consider.
Provocation can be applied as a defense for criminal offenses in the circumstance of the
heat of passion. The heat of passion is a core component to provocation as a defense, in which a
person causes death due to the heat of passion. The accused person must have caused death
because that person was provoked not simply because provocation happened. There should a
presence of a causal relationship between the killing and the provocation, the amount of
temporary as well as sudden loss of self-discipline. This renders the accused of being a subject to
the passion that makes him or her loses a moment of mastering his or her mind. The heat of
10
Republic v Martin Kinyua Nancy [2016] eKLR 14
11
Penal Code (Cap.63), s202, s203, s204, s205
12
Mbugua Kariuki v. Republic [1979] eKLR 29
Provocation as Defense 6
passion due to provocation has been used in courts of law as a defense mechanism against
In the case, Republic v Martin Kinyua Nancy [2016] eKLR 14, the defendant person was
doing his daily chores at a hotel by serving the client when the deceased emerged and demanded
to be attended.13 The deceased did not demonstrate patience as the accused was serving other
customers. The deceased move close to the defendant with the aim of being served. Due to lack
of patience to wait, the deceased slapped the accused. His action annoyed the accused who used
the knife he was holding to stab the deceased. The defendant did not move to look for knife
rather he used the knife on his working table and used it a weapon. That is, he applied what he
had at that moment to stab the deceased.14 Despite the fact that the deceased was not equipped
with any weapon, his action irritated the accused and prompted him to stab him immediately. In
this scenario, the deceased was the assaulter, and this revealed that the defendant acted in the
heat of passion and the evidence did not reveal any premeditation on the part of the appellant.
The ruling from this case shows that the trial judge did not consider the heat of passion in his
verdict to convict the accused of murder. 15However, the court found there was enough evidence
on the defense of provocation and the accused acted on the heat of passion of being assaulted by
the deceased. The Court of Appeal did not sustain the verdict of murder under Section 203 as
read with Section 204 rather the learned judge found the appellant of being guilty of
manslaughter Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code. 16
13
Republic v Martin Kinyua Nancy [2016] eKLR 14
14
Ibid
15
NJERU VS REPUBLIC [2006] 2 KLR 46.
16
Penal Code (Cap.63), s202, s203, s204, s205
Provocation as Defense 7
Therefore, the Court of Appeal accepted heat of passion as provocation defense of the
accused and reduced the murder to manslaughter under manslaughter Section 202 as read
providing proof of provocation. For instance, property destruction before the owner of the
property could also provide evidence of a wrongful act or insult. An insult is considered scornful
utterances, behavior, and injuries intended to harm self-respect. It is a humiliation and insult to
1) Whoever desires any court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent
on the existence of facts which he asserts must prove that those facts exist.17
2) When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact it is said that the burden of
In such circumstance, the defendant assumes no onus to prove his or her guiltlessness and
any explanation or defense put forward by the defendant is only to be considered on a balance of
possibility.19 Therefore, the standard of evidence brought before the prosecution is to demonstrate
the guilt of the defendant beyond reasonable doubt.20 The provocation defense only stands when
the court regards the proof presented on behalf of the defendant that the defendant’s action that
17
Evidence Act (Cap.80) s107 (1)
18
Evidence Act (Cap.80) s107 (2)
19
Republic v Martin Kinyua Nancy [2016] eKLR 14
20
Wangombe versus R (1980) KLR 119,
Provocation as Defense 8
led to the death of the deceased was caused by sudden provocation. This has been demonstrated
Conclusion
Provocation has become a statutory element in Kenya law as demonstrated by Section 207
and Section 208 of Kenyan Penal Code, which defines the term and its applicability. The
provocation has been used successfully by accused people to reduce a murder sentence to a
manslaughter sentence as provided by Section 202 as read with 205 of the Kenya Penal code.
References
Legislations
Cases
Book
Fitz-Gibbon, Kate, Homicide Law Reform, Gender and the Provocation Defence: A Comparative
Perspective. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014)