Professional Documents
Culture Documents
solar-energy theory
By Scientific American, adapted by Newsela staff on 11.22.15
Word Count 945
Pictured is the emerald sea slug, Elysia chlorotica. EOL Learning and Education Group, via Flickr
Nature is full of thieves. Instead of collecting pollen and nectar from flowers, robber bees
raid the hives of other pollinators and steal their honey. Some ant species routinely kidnap
and enslave members of neighboring colonies. Massive-winged frigate birds — also called
pirate birds — swoop down on smaller seabirds and snatch the fish right out of their
beaks.
The sea slugs known as sacoglossans are some of the most remarkable biological
burglars on the planet. The animals are about the length of a postage stamp or two. They
feed on simple underwater plants known as algae, which have no stems, roots or leaves,
but do contain chlorophyll, a green pigment or coloring matter. Chlorophyll is used in
photosynthesis, a process by which plants capture the sun's energy and combine it with
carbon dioxide and water to make food. Oxygen is produced as a byproduct of
photosynthesis.
For the past several decades, scientists thought that the slugs hoarded chloroplasts in
order to become solar-powered animal-plant combinations. The theory made a lot of
sense. Experiments confirmed that, when placed in the light, the slugs actively absorbed
carbon dioxide, just like leaves. Furthermore, some of the slugs could stay alive in a well-lit
laboratory for months with no food. Besides, why else would the animals go to the trouble
of preserving the chloroplasts, if not as a long-term energy source?
At the end of the starvation period, all the slugs were alive, equally pale and all had lost
about the same amount of weight. It was clear that their health and survival did not depend
on whether or not they could photosynthesize.
“It’s very appealing to think that here you have an animal slowly turning into plant,” Gould
says. “But now we’re back at square one.” Gould has proposed that, rather than becoming
part vegetable, the slugs are doing something lots of critters do: saving some of the food
they collect for times of hardship.
Some sacoglossans hibernate in the winter, burrowing into debris at the bottom of the
ocean floor. Sunlight would not help them endure this subterranean slumber, but a
digestive sac full of chloroplasts would do the trick. That would also explain how the slugs
in his experiment made it through nearly two months of perpetual night without any food
and why all the slugs were pale and shrunken after the ordeal.
Even if these slugs are not relying primarily on photosynthesis for nutrition, they might be
using some of the oxygen produced by the process. If so, they would resemble the
spotted salamander, which has evolved a symbiotic relationship with algae that live in its
eggs: inside the eggs, developing salamanders breathe in the oxygen the algae release
while the plants enjoy the animal’s exhaled carbon dioxide.
There are several other possible explanations for the slugs’ green coloration. Perhaps
some of the slugs are camouflaging themselves — after all, they spend an awful lot of time
hanging out on green plants. Or maybe green is to these slugs as pink is to flamingos: sex
A Tangled Relationship
The chloroplasts E. chlorotica captures from its algae primarily make lipids, which provide
a source of energy as well as building materials for cells. A young slug needs lipids to
grow rapidly, and in most species the slug's own body has to produce these lipids. What if
E. chlorotica has given over its lipid production to chloroplasts? If so, captive chloroplasts
would be so much more than a postponed meal for the slugs — they would be more like a
continually renewed vital organ.
(A) The animals are about the length of a postage stamp or two. They feed on
simple underwater plants known as algae, which have no stems, roots or
leaves, but do contain chlorophyll, a green pigment or coloring matter.
(B) Experiments confirmed that, when placed in the light, the slugs actively
absorbed carbon dioxide, just like leaves. Furthermore, some of the slugs
could stay alive in a well-lit laboratory for months with no food.
(C) At the end of the starvation period, all the slugs were alive, equally pale and
all had lost about the same amount of weight. It was clear that their health
and survival did not depend on whether or not they could photosynthesize.
(D) There are several other possible explanations for the slugs’ green coloration.
Perhaps some of the slugs are camouflaging themselves — after all, they
spend an awful lot of time hanging out on green plants.
Does this particular sentence support a CENTRAL idea of the article? Why or why not?
(A) Yes; it develops the idea that the relationship between sea slugs and
chloroplasts is more complex than scientists had previously thought.
(B) Yes; it explains the primary experiment and recent discovery that caused
scientists to rethink their theories about sea slugs and chloroplasts.
(C) No; it explains a theory that is interesting, but only indirectly related to the
experiment regarding sea slugs and chloroplasts.
(D) No; it develops an alternate theory that seems to contradict the main theory
about sea slugs and chloroplasts discussed in the article.
(A) by thoroughly describing a species of slug that "steals" and uses a part from
other species
(B) by providing a variety of examples of animal species that "steal" from other
species
(C) by describing a relationship in which two species "steal" from each other in a
battle for survival
4 Which of the following statements BEST represents Gould's perspective on his discovery?
(A) It will likely eliminate the need for further research into the biology of sea
slugs.
(B) It demonstrates that the earlier theory about sea slugs was appealing, but
unproductive.
(C) It is a starting point for new discoveries about sea slugs and chloroplasts.
(D) It suggests that scientists currently have a very limited understanding of sea
slugs.