You are on page 1of 6

FMEA Document

FMEA
Part or Process Name Facilities Affected Prepared By
Program FMEA Start Date Last Updated
Core Team Revision Level FMEA Number

Action Results
Process Step, Operation, Current Controls/

Class
Function or Potential Failure Potential Effect(s) of Potential Cause(s) Evaluation Sx Recommended Action Taken &
Requirements Mode Failure S of Failure O Method D O RPN Action(s) Assigned To Due Date Effective Date O D Diff PCT% RPN

06/02/2018 04:12:02 Page 1 of 6 388822647.xls


FMEA Document

06/02/2018 04:12:02 Page 2 of 6 388822647.xls


Detection Rankings
Ranking Effect Design FMEA Detection Process FMEA Detection
Absolute No chance that design control will detect No known process control to detect cause
10
uncertainty cause mechanism and subsequent failure. mechanism and subsequent failure.

Very remote chance that design control


9 Very remote will detect cause mechanism and
subsequent failure.
Remote chance that design control will Remote chance that process control to
8 Remote detect cause mechanism and subsequent detect cause mechanism and subsequent
failure. failure.
Very low chance that design control will
7 Very Low detect cause mechanism and subsequent
failure.

Low chance that design control will detect Low chance that process control to detect
6 Low
cause mechanism and subsequent failure. cause mechanism and subsequent failure.

Moderate chance that design control will


5 Moderate detect cause mechanism and subsequent
failure.
Moderately high chance that design
Moderately
4 control will detect cause mechanism and
High
subsequent failure.
very remote chance that design control
High chance that process control to detect
3 High will detect cause mechanism and
cause mechanism and subsequent failure.
subsequent failure.
Very high chance that design control will
2 Very High detect cause mechanism and subsequent
failure.

Design control will almost certainly detect Current control almost certain to detect
1 Almost Certain
cause mechanism and subsequent failure. cause mechanism and failure mode.
Occurrence Rankings
Ranking Effect Failure Rates Percent Defective Cpk
10 Extremely High > 1 in 2 50% Cpk < 0.33
9 Very High 1 in 3 33% Cpk ~ 0.5
8 Very High 1 in 8 10-15% Cpk ~ 0.75
7 High 1 in 20 5%
6 Marginal 1 in 100 1%
5 Marginal 1 in 400 0.25% Cpk ~ 1
4 Unlikely 1 in 2000 0.05%
3 Low 1 in 15,000 0.007% Cpk > 1.33
2 Very Low 1 in 150,000 0.0007% Cpk > 1.5
1 Remote < 1 in 1,500,000 0.000007% Cpk > 1.67
Severity Rankings
Ranking Effect Design FMEA Severity Process FMEA Severity
affects safe operation without may endanger machine or
10 Hazardous-no warning
warning operator without warning
affects safe operation with may endanger machine or
9 Hazardous- w/ warning
warning operator with warning
major disruption in operations
8 Very High makes product inoperable
(100% scrap)
makes product operable at minor disruption in operations
7 High reduced performance (may require sorting and some
(customer dissatisfaction) scrap)
minor disruption in operations
6 Moderate results in customer discomfort
(no sorting but some scrap)

results in comfort and minor disruption in operations


5 Low
convenience at a reduced level (portion may require rework)

minor disruption in operations


results in dissatisfication by
4 Very Low (some sorting and portion may
most customers.
require rework)

minor disruption (some rework


results in dissatisfication by
3 Minor but little affect on production
average customer.
rate)
results in dissatisfication by few minor disruption (minimal affect
2 Very Minor
customers. on production rate)
1 None No effect No effect
FMEA Attendance Sheet
Session Date1 Date2 Date3 Date4 Date5
Hours 2 2 4 2 2
Team Members Position x x x x x
Attendee1 Facilitator x x x
Attendee2 x x x x
Attendee3 x x x
Attendee4 x
Attendee5 x x x
Attendee6 x
Attendee7 x x x x x
Attendee8 x x x x x
Attendee9 x x x
Attendee10 x x x

You might also like