Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Food Control
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodcont
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Catechins have high anti-bacterial activity against various microorganisms. In this study, the mechanism
Received 23 December 2012 of anti-bacterial activity of catechins was investigated using Escherichia coli. Transmission electron mi-
Received in revised form croscope analysis revealed that deposits containing EGCg were found only on the outer membrane,
3 March 2013
which is the outermost layer of the cell surface, in E .coli cells treated with EGCg. Based on this obser-
Accepted 9 March 2013
vation, we focused on outer membrane proteins as targets of EGCg in E. coli. Two-dimensional electro-
phoresis identified 16 spots that had disappeared or showed markedly reduced intensity after treatment
Keywords:
with EGCg compared to the control. Of these, an outer membrane porin protein, OmpG, acids suggested
Catechins
Epigallocatechin gallate
that the basic amino acids Lys, Arg, and His strongly interacted with EGCg. The docking simulation with
Escherichia coli EGCg and OmpG revealed that EGCg enters into the porin pore and binds to Arg residues present on the
Porin inner surface of the pore channel through hydrogen bonding, resulting in inhibition of the porin function.
Furthermore, glucose uptake by E. coli was inhibited in cells treated with EGCg. Taken together, these
results suggest that EGCg inhibits the major function of porin proteins, namely the passive transport of
small hydrophilic molecules such as glucose, leading to growth inhibition of E. coli.
Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0956-7135/$ e see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.03.016
434 M. Nakayama et al. / Food Control 33 (2013) 433e439
catechins in an alkaline environment reacts with cerium to form a Tokyo, Japan) for 30 s and then dried in a desiccator under negative
precipitate (3H2O2 þ2Ce3þ þ 6OH/2Ce(OH)3OOH þ 2H2O) that pressure at room temperature for 48 h to embed each sample in the
further reacts with catechin to form a larger deposit (Nakayama, resin. The resin was subsequently hardened by heating the capsules
Shigemune, Tsugukuni, Tokuda, & Miyamoto, 2010). We devel- in a block heater (Cool Thermo Unit CTU-N Neo; Taitec Co., Ltd.,
oped an electron microscopy technique for visualizing this cerium Tokyo, Japan) at 40 C for 24 h followed by 70 C for 48 h. The resin
deposit and were able to determine the localization of catechins on was removed, and ultrathin sections (70e90 nm) were then cut
a bacterial surface (Nakayama, Shigemune, Tsugukuni, Tokuda, & with a diamond knife (Sumi Knife; Okenshoji Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
Miyamoto, 2011). SDS-PAGE analysis of cell proteins showed that Japan) using a microtome (Ultracut-S; Leica Microsystems, Tokyo,
catechins attached to proteins on the bacterial surface to form high- Japan) and collected on copper mesh for TEM examination (Sheet
molecular weight complexes, suggesting the possibility that cate- Mesh 150-A; Nissin EM Corp.). After drying, the mesh containing
chins inhibit the uptake and secretion of substrates, thereby the collected samples was examined under a TEM (H-7650; Hitachi
inhibiting enzyme activity (Nakayama, Shigemune, Tsugukuni, High-Technologies Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
et al., 2011).
In the present study, we analyzed the localization of EGCg on the 2.3. 2-D electrophoresis
surface of Escherichia coli cells using the visualization technique
previously developed in our laboratory (Nakayama, Shigemune, E. coli was cultured overnight in 100 ml TSB at 37 C with
Tsugukuni, Tokuda, et al., 2011). In addition, total proteins ob- shaking at 130 rpm. The bacterial culture was suspended in sterile
tained from bacterial cells pretreated with EGCg were analyzed by water at an OD660 of 1.0. Bacterial cells were harvested from 30 ml
SDS-PAGE and two-dimensional electrophoresis to isolate and of the resulting cell suspension by centrifugation at 6000 g for
identify the proteins that directly interact with EGCg. 10 min at room temperature. The cells were then resuspended in
300 ml sterile water to give a final concentration of approximately
2. Materials and methods 1 1010 cfu/ml.
Three ml of EGCg dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer was added
2.1. Bacterial strain and culture conditions to 27 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution to give a 30 ml EGCg
solution at a final concentration of 1 g/L, which is the MIC against
The bacterial strain used in this study was E. coli NBRC 3972. The E. coli. A 30 ml phosphate buffer solution was used as a control. The
bacterium was cultured in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Becton, Dickinson bacterial suspension (300 ml) was added to the test and control
& Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and soybean-casein digest (SCD) agar solutions to give a final concentration of 108 cfu/ml. The samples
(Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for preparing sam- were mixed thoroughly and then incubated at 37 C for 1 h. The
ples for two-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis and for trans- mixture was transferred to a FastPROTEINÔ BLUE tube containing
mission electron microscopy (TEM) and DOX analyses, respectively. glass beads (MP Biomedicals, LLC), which were cooled in advance
to 20 C, and the bacterial cells were disrupted using a FastPrep-
2.2. TEM examination 24 Instrument (MP Biomedicals, LLC) at 6.0 m/s for 20 s. After
cooling the sample for 1 min on ice, the disruption was repeated a
E. coli NBRC 3972 cells were collected after cultivation on SCD second time and the supernatants were collected by centrifugation
agar at 35 C for 24 h and were suspended in 10 mM HEPES buffer at 10,000 g for 1 min at 4 C. The concentration of proteins in the
(pH 6.5) to a final cell concentration of 108 cfu/ml. EGCg dissolved at supernatant was measured using a Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB)
2 g/L in 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 6.5) and 0.45-ml aliquots of this protein assay, and the supernatant was then diluted with 50 mM
solution were added to 1.5-ml microtubes. To this solution, 0.05 ml phosphate buffer solution to give a concentration of approximately
of the E. coli NBRC 3972 suspension was added, and the resulting 3 mg protein/ml. The supernatant was filtered through a Millex-HV
mixture was then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with Filter (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), and the filtrate
shaking. The suspension was then centrifuged at 14,000 g for was used as a source of total cellular proteins. Protein samples used
10 min and the pellets were washed three times with 0.5 ml of for isoelectric focusing (IEF) were prepared as follows by reference
10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 6.5). The EGCg-treated cells were then to protein purification method of Suzuki, et al (2011). Trifluoro-
suspended in 0.5 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 8) containing 0.1% acetic acid was added to 250 ml of the extracted proteins to give a
CeCl3 and mixed thoroughly to allow the hydrogen peroxide pro- final concentration of 15%, and the precipitate was collected by
duced by EGCg to react with cerium. After 15 min, the bacteria were centrifugation (20,000 g, 15 min, 4 C). Cold ethanol/ether solvent
collected by centrifugation at 14,000 g for 10 min and washed (1 ml) was added to the precipitate, and the solution was strongly
three times with 0.5 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.0). The pre- agitated. The precipitate collected from the suspension by centri-
cipitate was suspended in 0.5 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.0) fugation at 20,000 g for 20 min at 4 C was suspended in 1 ml
containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and incubated at 4 C for 24 h for ethanol/ether solvent. After repeating the washing process three
fixation. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 14,000 g times, the collected precipitate was dried at room temperature, and
for 10 min and were washed twice with 0.5 ml of 10 mM HEPES then dissolved in 0.25 ml IEF lysis buffer (6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 3%
buffer (pH 7.0). The bacterial cells were dehydrated by serial CHAPS, 1% Triton X-100, and DeStreak reagent [GE Healthcare]) and
ethanol washing (0.5 ml each; 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100%, and sonicated at 20 W for 45 min at room temperature. The IEF sample
100%) for 15 min at room temperature. Following dehydration, thus prepared was centrifuged at 20,000 g for 20 min at room
0.02 ml of the bacterial suspension was aliquoted into BEEM temperature and the resulting supernatant was loaded onto an
embedding capsules (Nissin EM Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and then Immobiline DryStrip gel (pH 3e10, non-linear, 13 cm; GE Health-
washed with 0.02 ml propylene oxide (Nissin EM Corp.). The cap- care) by swelling the gel for 5 h. IEF was performed at 5000 V for
sules were dried in a desiccator for 15 min, washed again with 15 h. The Immobiline DryStrip gel was then equilibrated in 2-D
0.02 ml propylene oxide, and dried again for 15 min; this procedure electrophoresis sample buffer (6 M urea, 20% glycerol, 2% DTT, 2%
was repeated three times to substitute the ethanol with propylene SDS, and 100 mM TriseHCl, pH 8.8) for 45 min. After equilibration,
oxide. Following propylene oxide substitution, 0.05 ml resin (Q- electrophoresis of the Immobiline DryStrip gel was carried out
615; Nissin EM Corp.) was added to the capsules. Samples were using a 10e18%, 16 16 cm polyacrylamide gradient gel (Bio Craft
degassed in a sonicator (Branson 5200; Yamato Scientific Co., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at a constant current of 25 mA/strip. After
M. Nakayama et al. / Food Control 33 (2013) 433e439 435
electrophoresis, the gel was stained for 16 h in 0.1% CBB G-250 2.5. Analysis of interaction between porin proteins and EGCg
solution and then decolorized in 5% acetic acid. Imaging was per-
formed with a GS-800 Calibrated Imaging Densitometer (Bio-Rad The interaction between EGCg and porin proteins was analyzed
Laboratories, Inc.). Spots that decreased to 1/3 or less compared to using the CDOCKER module of Discovery Studio software (Accelrys,
control and those that disappeared as a result of EGCg treatment Inc.) on a PC running Windows XP. The crystal structures of the
were judged to be the spots of proteins that interacted with EGCg. porin proteins OmpC (Baslé, Rummel, Storici, Rosenbusch, &
The proteins in these spots were identified by Peptide Mass Schirmer, 2006) and OmpG (Korkmaz-Özkan, Köster, Kühlbrandt,
Fingerprinting (PMF) analysis or MS/MS ion searches. For the Mäntele, & Yildiz, 2010) registered in the Protein Data Bank were
analysis, the samples were enzymatically digested with trypsin and used for the calculations. Docking simulations were conducted
then desalted and purified with a ZipTip C18 column (Millipore with EGCg positioned in the center of the inner part of the porin
Corp.) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. pore. In this section of the pore, there are three residues of the basic
The extracted samples were applied to a Matrix Assisted Laser amino acid Arg, which reacts with EGCg, and the pore size is at its
Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) plate and allowed to dry. A matrix narrowest.
solution (5 mg/ml a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid [CHCA] in 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid/50% acetonitrile) was applied to the sample and 2.6. Measurement of oxygen consumption rate accompanying
after drying, mass spectrometry analysis was carried out using a uptake of glucose
MALDI-TOF-MS fitted with a PMF 337-nm nitrogen laser (AXIMA
Performance; Shimadzu Corp.) in positive-ion reflectron mode. The E. coli colonies that formed on SCD agar were collected by
proteins were identified using the MASCOT search engine (Matrix scraping, suspended in a sterile saline solution, and aliquoted into
Science, Ltd.) against the National Center for Biotechnology Infor- 1.5-ml tubes (Sarstedt K.K., Tokyo, Japan). The bacterial cells were
mation (NCBI) database. washed by centrifugation and suspension in 1.0 ml of a sterile saline
In the MS/MS ion search, peptides were obtained in the same solution. The resulting suspension was centrifuged to collect bac-
way as for the PMF analysis. The peptide fragments were isolated terial cells, which were then resuspended to approximately
by nano-liquid chromatography (nano LC) and individual frag- 3 109 cfu/ml in 1.0 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 6.0) (Irvine
ments were then analyzed by mass spectrometry. Nano LC-MS/MS Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA) containing either 0.5 g/L EGCg or no
analysis was performed using a DiNa-2A Nano LC system (KYA EGCg. The samples were incubated for 1 h at 35 C. After incubation,
Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) coupled online to a LCMS-IT-TOF mass the EGCg-treated and non-treated cells were collected by centri-
spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Separation of peptides fugation and suspended in 1.0 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 6.0).
was performed using a Pico Frit Beta Basic C18 column (New The sample solutions (1 ml) were added to a DOX s-electrode cell
Objective, USA) at a constant flow rate of 300 nl/min. Peptides (Bio-Theta, Ltd., Osaka, Japan), to which 1 ml of a 0.2% glucose so-
were eluted from the column with gradients of 2e40% solvent B lution in 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 6.0) was added. The DOX cells
(0.1% formic acid in 80% ACN)/0e30 min, 40e100% solvent B/30e were promptly set in a DOX-60F cell cartridge with electrodes (Bio-
40 min, and 100% solvent B/40e60 min. The LCMS-IT-TOF mass Theta, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and the electric current due to dissolved
spectrometer was operated in the data-dependent MS/MS mode oxygen in the fluid of the DOX cell was measured using an oxygen
at scan ranges (Hyakkoku, Hamanaka, Tsuruma, Shimazawa, & electrode.
Hara, 2010).
3. Results
2.4. Interaction between amino acids and EGCg
3.1. Identification of EGCg attachment sites on E. coli by TEM
Twenty amino acids (Gly, Ala, Val, Leu, Ile, Phe, Thr, Cys, Met, Trp,
Tyr, Gln, Asp, Glu, Arg, His [Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.], E. coli cells treated with EGCg were reacted with cerium chlo-
Pro, Ser, Asn [Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.], and Lys [Tokyo Chemical ride, and ultrathin sections of bacterial cells embedded in resin
Industry Co., Ltd.]) were added to separate solutions of 1% EGCg in were then examined by TEM (Fig. 1). Deposits containing EGCg
50 mM sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.5) to give a final were found only on the outer membrane, which is the outermost
amino acid concentration of 2%. After incubation for a fixed time at layer of the cell surface. The deposits were unevenly distributed
25 C to allow reaction with EGCg, precipitate formation was across the outer membrane, and were attached to the cell surface in
confirmed by the naked eye. sparse patches. No deposits were found inside of cells.
Fig. 1. TEM micrographs of Escherichia coli NBRC 3972 cells treated with EGCg. Bacteria were treated with EGCg in HEPES buffer at pH 6.5 for 1 h at room temperature. Following
centrifugation and washing, cells were treated with 0.1% cerium chloride at pH 8.0, sectioned, and examined by TEM. A, Ultra-thin section of bacteria treated with 0.50 mg/mL EGCg.
B, Magnification of the boxed area in A. Bar ¼ 100 nm.
436 M. Nakayama et al. / Food Control 33 (2013) 433e439
were analyzed by imaging, which showed that numerous spots gij157160451 Outer membrane protein F (Porin) 39.9 4.8
gij6650193 Outer membrane protein OmpC (Porin) 40.4 4.5
present in the non-EGCg-treated cells had either disappeared or
gij170019471 Outer membrane porin protein C 41.4 4.6
showed a marked reduction in intensity in the EGCg-treated cells. gij12517874 Penicillin- binding protein 3 39.1 5.3
The proteins corresponding to these spots had likely formed de- gij16130858 Periplasmic L-asparaginase II 36.9 5.9
posits as a result of EGCg treatment and thus did not migrate in the Includes proteins whose spots were decreased in intensity by two-thirds or greater
gel. The 16 spots identified in the gel (Fig. 2) that had either reduced in the two-dimensional electrophoresis.
a
to one third or less of their original intensity or had completely Theoretical mass.
b
disappeared were selected. Of the 16 spots, proteins with a mo- Theoretical pI.
lecular mass of 20 kDa or less were identified by MS/MS ion
searches, while those with a molecular mass greater than 20 kDa
Table 2
were identified by PMF. A total of 64 proteins with significant scores EGCg precipitation reactions with individual amino acids.
were found, of which five are present on the cell surface (Table 1).
Amino Precipitation Amino Precipitation Amino Precipitation
Of these, only porin proteins were identified as outer membrane
acid acid acid
proteins. The cell membrane and periplasm proteins MreB, peri-
Gly e Ser e Gln e
plasmic asparaginase, and periplasmic oligopeptide-binding pro- Ala e Thr e Asp e
tein were also identified. Val e Cys e Glu e
Leu e Met e Lys þ
Ile e Trp e Arg þþþ
3.3. Interaction between amino acids and EGCg
Phe e Tyr e His þþ
Pro e Asn e
The reactivity of amino acids towards EGCg is shown in Table 2.
20 amino acids were added to a final concentration of 2% to a solution of 1% EGCg in
The amino acids that reacted strongly with EGCg to form a pre- 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and allowed to react. After incubation for a
cipitate were the basic amino acids Lys, Arg, and His. fixed time at 25 C, each solution was checked for precipitate.
e, no reaction producing precipitate; þ, reaction producing trace amounts of
precipitate; þþ, reaction producing a precipitate; þþþ, reaction producing a strong
3.4. Interaction between EGCg and outer membrane porin proteins
precipitate.
As the only nutrient source in the fluid in the DOX 60-F cell By TEM observation and 2-D electrophoresis analysis, we found
cartridge was glucose, the difference between the EGCg-treated that EGCg interacts with the channel of the E. coli outer membrane
Fig. 2. Two-dimensional electrophoresis gel images of proteins extracted from EGCg-treated (A) and untreated Escherichia coli NBRC 3972 cells (B). A, Cells treated with 1.0 mg/ml
EGCg; B, Untreated cells. Arrows indicate protein spots of lower intensity in the sample treated with 1.0 mg/ml EGCg compared to the untreated sample.
M. Nakayama et al. / Food Control 33 (2013) 433e439 437
Fig. 6. The presumed mechanism of antibacterial activity of EGCg in E. coli. (a) Porin functions as a pore for passive transport of small hydrophilic molecules across the outer
membrane. (b) EGCg interacts with basic amino acid residues localized on the inner wall of the pore formed by the porin protein, and results in the inhibition of the function of
porin. Consequently, EGCg seems to inhibit the uptake of hydrophilic nutrients such as glucose.
Mendel, F. (2007). Overview of antibacterial, antitoxin, antiviral, and antifungal activ- Escherichia coli visualized by electron microscopy after novel indirect staining
ities of tea flavonoids and teas. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 51, 116e134. with cerium chloride. Journal of Microbiological Methods., 86, 97e103.
Murase, T., Nagasawa, A., Suzuki, J., Hase, T., & Tokimitsu, I. (2002). Beneficial effects of Nance, C. L., Siwak, E. B., & Shearer, W. T. (2009). Preclinical development of the
tea catechins on diet-induced obesity, stimulation of lipid catabolism in the liver. green tea catechin, epigallocatechin gallate, as an HIV-1 therapy. Journal of Al-
International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 26, 1459e1464. lergy and Clinical Immunology, 123, 459e465.
Nakayama, T., Ichiba, M., Kuwabara, M., Kajiya, K., & Kumazawa, S. (2002). Mech- Rice-Evans, C. A., Miller, N. J., & Paganga, G. (1996). Structure-antioxidant activity
anisms and structural specificity of hydrogen peroxide formation during relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radical Biology and Medicine,
oxidation of catechins. Food Science and Technology Research., 8, 261e267. 20, 933e956.
Nakayama, M., Shigemune, N., Tsugukuni, T., Hitomi, J., Matsushita, T., Mekada, Y., Si, W., Gong, J., Tsao, R., Kalab, M., Yang, R., & Yin, Y. (2006). Bioassay-guided pu-
et al. (2011). Mechanism of the combined anti-bacterial effect of green tea rification and identification of antimicrobial components in Chinese green tea
extract and NaCl against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli O157:H7. extract. Journal of Chromatography, 1125, 204e210.
Food Control, 25, 225e232. Stagg, G. V. (1980). Tea-the elements of cuppa. Nutrition Bulletin, 29, 233e245.
Nakayama, M., Shigemune, N., Tsugukuni, T., Tokuda, H., & Miyamoto, T. (2010). Tsuchiya, H. (2001). Stereospecificity in membrane effects of catechins. Chemico-
Novel rapid method to determine polyphenols using cerium. International Biological Interactions, 134, 41e54.
Journal of Food Science & Technology, 45, 2071e2079. Yi, S., Zhu, J., Fu, L., & Li, L. (2010). Tea polyphenols inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Nakayama, M., Shigemune, N., Tsugukuni, T., Tokuda, H., & Miyamoto, T. (2011). through damage to the cell membrane. International Journal of Food Microbi-
Difference of EGCg adhesion on cell surface between Staphylococcus aureus and ology, 144, 111e117.