Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Math 2451
p= i + 2j k and v = j:
Thus
l(t) = ( i+2j k) + (tj) = i + (2 + t)j k:
(b) Here we have two choices for our vector p, which are p1 = 2j k and
p2 = 3i + j. Since v = p1 p2 is a vector in the direction of l, we have
v = 3i + j k and so
Here n = 2i + j + 2k and p = ( 1; 1; 3) so
6. (a)
i j k
1 0 1 0 1 1
v w= 1 1 0 = i j+ k = i + j;
0 1 0 1 0 0
0 0 1
(c)
1 1 2 1 2 1
v w= i j+ k =(2 2)i (4 3)j+( 4+3)k = j k:
2 2 3 2 3 2
1
uv
7. (a) cos = kukkvk . From 5(a) we have v w =0 so cos = 0
(c) from 5(c) we have v w = 10: Now we must …nd kvk and kwk : We
compute p p
kvk = ( 2)2 + ( 1)2 + (1)2 = 6
and p p
kwk = (3)2 + (2)2 + ( 2)2 = 17
so
u v 10
cos = =p :
kuk kvk 102
9. Suppose we have a triangle with vertices at the origin and the tips of a
and b. Denote the region bounded by this triangle as T R2 . Now, we may
parameterize the segment from the tip of a to the tip of b as
Observe that for every 0 t 1, we may associate the segment connecting the
origin and l(t). We see that
10. If three vectors a; b; and c lie in the same plane through the origin then
without loss of generality, we may assume that
That is,
v 2P ,v = a+ b
with ; 2 R. Now if c 2 P then, from our previous statement, we know
c = a + b for some ; 2 R so
a+ b+ c=0
a+ b+ c=0
with ; ; and are not all zero then let us …rst assume that 6= 0 so
a= b c
2
and therefore
a 2 spanfb; cg = P;
where P is a plane through the origin. A similar arguments holds if we assume
6= 0 or 6= 0 therefore, in any case, the vectors a; b; and c lie in the same
plane through the origin, as desired.
11. Square both sides of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality and apply this new
inequality to the vectors a and b associated with the points (a1 ; a2 ; a3 ) and
(b1 ; b2 ; b3 ); respectively.
and
kuk = kvk = kwk = 1:
Thus a = u + v + w implies
2
a u = ( u + v + w) u = kuk + (v u) + (u w) = :
15. Let v = kak b + kbk a so v bisects the angle between a and b if and
only if
v a v b
= , v a kvk kbk = v b kvk kak :
kvk kak kvk kbk
Now we divide both sides of the equality by kvkand substitute in our de…nition
for v to get
(kak b + kbk a)a kbk = (kak b + kbk a)b kak ;
which is equivalent to
2 2 2 2
kak kbk ba + kbk kak = kak kbk + kbk kak ab;
l = f(x; y) 2 R2 : ax + by = c with a; b; c 2 Rg
is our given line then the distance between p and l is the length of the segment,
pl, connecting p to l in a direction perpendicular to our line. A vector parallel
to pl is of the form
u = (x xl)i + (y y1 )j
3
where (x; y) 2 l: Now, we just need this vector to point in the right direction.
Since the slope-intercept form of our line is y = bax + cb ; we see that v = (b; a)
is a vector in the direction of our line. We notice that w = (a; b) is a vector
perpendicular to v as v w = 0. Now, we need to make u point in the direction
of w and the resulting vector, projw u, will have our desired length and direction.
So, we compute
u w kwk
kprojw uk = 2w = ju wj 2
kwk kwk
ja(x x ) + b(y y1 )j jax ax1 + by by1 j
= p1 = p :
a2 + b2 a2 + b2
jax1 + by1 cj
kprojw uk = p ;
a2 + b2
as desired.
20. If
and
Now, we project v onto n since projn v has the desired length and direction.
We compute
Now, using
Ax1 + By2 + Cz3 = D1
4
and
Ax2 + By2 + Cz2 = D2 ;
we have
jD1 D2 j
kprojn vk = p ;
A2 + B 2 + C 2
as desired.
since
1 + cos 2 1 cos 2
cos2 = and sin2 = :
2 2
Now, in spherical coordinates we have
cos ' = 2
sin2 '(cos2 sin2 ) = 2
sin2 ' cos 2
or
cos ' = sin2 ' cos 2 :
30. The volume of the parallelepiped spanned by the the given vectors is
equal to the absolute value of the determinant
1 0 1
1 1 1 = 3:
3 2 0
32. If a plane P contains the points (3; 1; 2) and (2; 1; 0) then the vector
u = (1; 0; 2) is parallel to P. However, since the line
v = (2; 1; 0) + t(2; 3; 0)
5
is contained in the plane then the vector w = (2; 3; 0) is also parallel to P.
Since we know u and w are two vectors in P, we may …nd a normal vector to
P, n = u w. We compute
0 2 1 2 1 0
n= i j+ k =( 6; 4; 3):
3 0 2 0 2 3
So
1 x x2
y y2 x x2 x x2
1 y y2 = i j+ k =yz(z y)i+xz(x z)j+xy(y x)k:
z z2 z z2 y y2
1 z z2
xy(y x) = 0 , x = y:
Thus, for any x; the given determinant is nonzero. Since our previous argument
for x could be applied to y or z, we conclude that the given determinant is zero
if x; y; and z are all di¤erent .
Solution 2: This solution requires less computation but a better under-
standing of logic, proof and the basic properties of the determinant. To prove a
logical statement p ) q it is logically equivalent to prove ~q ) ~p; that is not q
(the negation, or opposite, of the logical statement q) implies not p. The logical
statement ~q ) ~p is called the contrapositive of the logical statment p ) q.
This method of proof should not be confused with proof by contradiction. Here
p is "x; y; and z are all di¤erent" so ~p is "at least one pair of x; y; and z are
1 x x2 1 x x2
2
equal" and q is " 1 y y 6= 0" so ~q is " 1 y y 2 = 0". If we assume
2
1 z z 1 z z2
1 x x2
~q then 1 y y 2 = 0, so at least two of the rows or colums are linearly
1 z z2
dependent. In either case, this implies that at least one pair of x; y, and z are
equal (veri…cation is left to the reader), which is ~p, as desired.
6
38. Observe that row3 = 2(row2) row1. Since the row vectors are a
linearly dependent set, the value of the determinant is zero.
i j k
w=v (i j) = 2 1 1 =i j k:
1 1 0
p
Now, kwk = 3 so our desired unit vector is p1 (1; 1; 1):
3