Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation scale
(for referee, ARs and Description of the Marks
fourth official)
9.0 – 10.0 Excellent.
8.5 – 8.9 Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken.
8.3 – 8.4 Good. Expected level.
8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement.
8.0 – 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement.
7.9 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above.
7.8 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 – 8.2.
Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) for
7.5 – 7.7
improvement.
Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear important
7.0 – 7.4 mistake or a performance with two or more clear and important
mistakes.
6.0 – 6.9 Unacceptable.
Referee
Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.)
Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight the
referee’s tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teams
and players, teamwork etc.).
Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences!
Positive Points
His card management showed a good knowledge of the LotG. The first card was
correctly given for a player which deliberately tried to delay the resumption of the
1. game (mandatory situation), while the second was given for a clear foul on a
player which was running towards the area. No DOGSO because there was
another defender, and Faghani was able to notice that. Well done.
2. The foul detection was overall good, he whistled the needed in a fair match.
3. Teamwork was ok, a few situations were reported to him by assistants
4. Communication with players and control of the game. Never problems.
very very
Tactical Approach lenient medium strict
lenient strict
Description X
Yes So-so No
Consistency in the tactical approach / style X
The tactical approach suited to the require-
ments of the match / the match benefitted X
from the tactical approach of the referee
Ability to adapt the tactical approach if
X
needed
Assistant Referee 1
Assistant Referee 2
Please assess the second assistant referee’s performance.
Fourth Official
Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth official’s behaviour
Expected level for the fourth official Sandro Ricci. His duties were well executed,
Full time
nothing extra-ordinary or relevant happened near the benches.