You are on page 1of 14

Sentinel Camera Unit

REDUCING
SAFETY RISKS
with the Sentinel
Camera Unit
(SCU)

Reduce exposure to
confined
spaces
Confined space
exposure

Setting charge levels

Reducing the need for people to enter


the mill will always improve safety
Confined space
exposure

Performing mill
inspections

Reducing the need for people to enter the mill will always improve
safety
Installation of the SCU
on the feed chute
The Camera Housing is permanently fixed to the feed chute
flange

The Control Box is permanently mounted onto the side or rear of the feed
chute
Downtime Uptime
6.50%
Time distribution 93.50%
without camera unit

Bolt retorquing - 5.27% (0.34%)

Downtime distribution Reline - 43.91% (2.85%)

without camera unit Bolt breakage - 5.27% (0.34%)

Other failures - 15.81% (1.03%)

Scheduled inspections - 29.75% (1.93%)

0% 50% 100%
**Typical downtime distribution for large SAG mills in South America
4.89% Downtime Additional Uptime Uptime
1.61%

Time distribution 93.50%


with a camera unit

Bolt retorquing - 7.01% (0.34%)

Reline - 56.54% (2.76%)

Bolt breakage - 7.01% (0.34%)


Downtime distribution Other failures - 21.03% (1.03%)
with a camera unit
Scheduled inspections - 8.41% (0.41%)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


**Typical downtime distribution for large SAG mills in South America
If the SCU could:

Increase mill uptime by 1.6%

and

Reduce your confined space risks

What is that worth to your bottom line?


Thanks

You might also like