Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COORDINACIÓN DE PRÁCTICA
FORMATO CONCEPTO MONOGRAFÍA 2018-1
10/05/18
TITULO DE LA MONOGRAFÍA
COMPONENTE PEDAGÓGICO
Coherencia y pertinencia entre la caracterización de la población, el problema de investigación, la
propuesta de intervención pedagógica, el análisis de los datos y la línea de investigación en la que
se ubica el estudio.
The pedagogical component is clear, coherent and well cohesion. I consider that the activities she
proposed, and the approach she selected were applied well and in an engaging and meaningful
way for the present population. Both research and pedagogical intervention were relevant to the
students. Probably a cooperative approach would have been more meaningful for so young
learners in such a big group, but this was not an inconvenient in the research as such.
COMPONENTE CONCEPTUAL
Exposición clara, pertinente, relevante de referentes teóricos en el desarrollo de las temáticas de
estudio.
Both State of the art and literature review are recent, relevant and complete. The researcher
explained in a complete manner and highlighted the relevance of the concepts and ideas for her
specific research.
Página 1 de 2
DEPARTAMENTO DE LENGUAS
COORDINACIÓN DE PRÁCTICA
COMPONENTE METODOLÓGICO
Coherencia y rigurosidad en la relación entre problema, pregunta, objetivos, marco teórico y
metodológico, análisis de resultados.
Solid methodological component. Problem, research question and objectives are coherent and
well-connected. The analysis showed good understanding and management of the theoretical
background and the researcher’s own collected data.
COMPONENTE TEXTUAL
Congruencia con las exigencias de un texto monográfico en términos de: registro formal y
académico de la lengua, empleo de otros códigos semióticos en la exposición de ideas, uso de
normas APA, manejo del formato y estructura exigidos (anexo 1), normas de redacción asociadas
a la coherencia y cohesión textual, etc.
Some minor mistakes in grammar, but especially in spelling, probably due to typos. The register is
formal and academic without sacrificing clarity.
Why did you think that a collaborative approach was better than a cooperative, taking into
account the characteristics of the group mentioned in the description of the population?
Página 2 de 2