Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-not-… 2/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
The above Scripture, along with many others, define Yahusha as being the only bego en
Son of the Father sent as the Messiah to the earth to save men from paying for their sins,
and Whom existed eternally with Yahuah from the beginning.
Another early teaching was called Semi-Arianism, which taught “the truly orthodox view of
the Son, that he was forever with the Father,” but were considered to be blasphemers of the
third person of the Trinitarian sovereign, since they did not count the Ruach Ha Kodesh (or
Set-Apart Spirit) OF Elohim “in the Godhead with the Father and the Son.” These are also
referred to as “binitarians,” or can be referred to as the belief in “binitarianism.”
Binitarianism is different from the “Oneness” doctrine, which asserts that the Father, Son
and Ruach Ha Kodesh of Elohim are all the same “Person.” This teaching is acutely
insufficient to describe Elohim, since, for instance, how could Yahusha pray to Himself in
the Garden of Gethsemane? This false doctrine also violates the following scriptures:
Gen. 1:1, 26 – The plural word for “Elohim” is used regarding creation, indicating that
Elohim is composed of separate individuals.
Col. 1:16-19; Heb. 1:2 – Yahusha was active in creation as a separate individual.
Jn. 1:1 – Uses the Greek definite article, to differentiate between two divine individuals
in this verse.
Jn. 14:23 – Yahusha uses the plural pronoun “we,” which proves He is a separate
individual from the Father.
1 Cor. 11:3 – Messiah is the head of man, and Yahuah is the head of Messiah, proving that
Messiah and the Father are separate individuals.
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-not-… 3/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
2 Jn. 1:9 – John uses the word “both” to show that the Father and Son are separate
individuals.
1 Tim. 2:5 – Yahusha is portrayed as the mediator between man and Yahuah the Father,
proving that Messiah is a separate individual from the Father.
Rom. 8:34 – Yahusha is portrayed as seated at the right hand of Yahuah, interceding for
believers, proving that He is a separate individual from the Father.
1 Jn. 2:1 – Yahusha is portrayed as our Advocate in heaven, pleading our case before
Yahuah, proving that He is a separate individual from the Father.
1 Cor. 15:23-24 – Yahusha will hand over the kingdom to the Father at the end, proving
He is a separate individual from the Father.
Phil. 2:10-11 – Yahusha will be exalted for eternity in heaven, and bring glory to the
Father, showing that He is a separate individual from the Father.
Heb. 12:2 – Yahusha is in heaven, si ing at the right hand of the throne of Yahusha,
proving He is a separate individual from the Father.
Heb. 13:8 – Yahusha is portrayed as the same for all eternity, proving that He is always a
separate individual from the Father.
Rev. 22:1, 3 – Yahuah the Father and the Lamb (Yahusha) are two separate individuals
whom people will worship in heaven.
The earliest Fathers, (within two generations of the Apostles of Messiah) are usually called
the Apostolic Fathers and include Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch and Polycarp of
Smyrna (h p://www.earlychristianwritings.com/index.html), and do not speak of the Ruach
Ha Kodesh as a Person. In addition, the Didache
(h p://www.scrollpublishing.com/store/Didache-text.html), or “Teaching of the Twelve
Disciples,” and a strange allegory called the “Shepherd of Hermas
(h p://www.earlychristianwritings.com/shepherd.html),” do not teach of a Trinity.
Athenagoras of Athens (h p://www.earlychristianwritings.com/athenagoras.html) (133-
190AD) wrote that the Ruach Ha Kodesh was an “effluence of God, flowing forth and
returning to God like a ray of the sun.”
It wasn’t until 325AD, when Constantine (a pagan syncretist and Roman catholic emperor)
convened the Council of Nicaea in order to develop a statement of faith that could unify the
Roman Catholic Church, that the doctrine of the Trinity became popularized, declaring that
the Father and the Son are of the same substance (homoousios), thereby taking a decidedly
anti-Arian stand. Arius was then exiled to Illyria.
And then in 381AD, the First Council of Constantinople, convened by Roman emperor
Theodosius I, then emperor of the East and a recent convert to early Catholicism, drew up a
dogmatic statement on the Trinity and defined the Ruach Ha Kodesh as having the same
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-not-… 4/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
sovereignty expressed for the Son by the Council of Nicaea 56 years earlier.
So, let’s summarize what happened concerning the development of the Trinity:
1. The Trinity doctrine is not taught anywhere in scripture, but trinities were common in
Paganism and were prominent in Egypt and Babylon.
2. The beginnings of recognition of this doctrine started at the Council of Nicaea
approximately 325 AD, hundreds of years after the last book in the Scripturese was
wri en.
3. The Council of Nicaea was organized by the Roman Emperor Constantine in which he
had the final say on ma ers that he had li le understanding of.
4. Creed followed creed, and eventually idols were accepted as forms that we can worship
YHWH through, and Mary was exalted to be the Mother of YHWH and worship of the
saints was sanctioned.
5. The organized denominations are different than the Body of Messiah spoken of in the
Scriptures, proving that most denominations are still rooted in a creed, and in the Trinity
doctrine, with most denominations still having the Trinity Doctrine as a foundation, of
which originally came from Babylon.
6. The mother of these denominations is the Roman Catholic Church
(h ps://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/mystery-babylon-the-great-whore-of-
revelation-is-revealed-the-vatican-is-in-rome-built-within-seven-hills-which-the-city-
sits-upon/), which has murdered anywhere from tens of millions to well over 50 million
people, had armies and banned access to the scriptures to Believers, which also is known
today as the Dark Ages.
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-not-… 5/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
1. During the Reformation, the teachings and authority of the Catholic Church was
challenged, with some truths becoming popular once again to the Body of Messiah.
2. As a result many new denominations started up, but unfortunately they held onto some
of the creeds, and in particular, held onto the Trinity doctrine.
The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is also responsible for burning to death millions of
people, many of whom were Believers. They labeled people as heretics for things like
reading scripture, translating scripture or daring to obey the Scriptures instead of their
traditions (traditions of men).
Most denominations today have a Statement of Faith as their foundation, and are usually
based on creeds. Often, Believers are required to take out membership, which often requires
an acceptance of a particular Statement of Faith, even though it is un-Sriptural.
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-not-… 6/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
1. Yahuah has spoken to us through the Prophets and now his Son. Hebrews 1:1-6
2. The Son is the exact brightness of Yahuah’s esteem. Hebrews 1:1-6
3. Yahusha is the image of the invisible Elohim. Colossians 1:12-16
4. Messiah is the radiance of Elohim’s esteem and the exact representation of His being.
Hebrews 1:1-3
5. Yahusha is the very nature of Yahuah. Philippians 2:5
6. Yahuah considers Yahusha part of Elohim. Hebrews 1:8,9
7. Elohim sustains all things by his Word (Yahusha is the Word of Elohim). Hebrews 1:3,
John 1:1
8. Yahusha is before all things and in Him all things hold together. Colossians 1:15
9. Yahusha is seated at the right hand of Yahuah. Colossians 3:1-3
10. Yahusha inherited a name more superior to the Angels. Hebrews 1:1-6
11. Yahusha is worthy to be worshipped by Kodesh Messengers. Hebrews 1:1-6
12. Yahusha is worshiped by humans. Ma hew 2:10-12, Ma hew 8:2, Ma hew 14:32-33, John
9:35-38, Ma hew 28:8-10, Ma hew 28:16-17
13. Yahuah became a Father when he begat his Son: “You are my Son, today I have become
Your Father.” Hebrews 1:1-6
14. Yahusha is the Firstborn from the Dead. Revelation 1:4-6
15. Yahusha has first place in everything. Yahusha is head over the Body of Yahusha
Messiah. Ephesians 1:22
16. Yahusha is Savior of the world (of believers). John 4:42, Titus 2:13, Isaiah 45:22, 43:11
17. Yahusha is Yahuah’s firstborn. Hebrews 1:1-6
18. Yahusha is Ruler and Beginning of the Creation of Elohim. Revelation 3:14
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-not-… 7/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-not-… 8/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Clement of Alexandria, Renowned Christian Teacher in Egypt (c. 195AD) “O the Great
God! O the Perfect Child! The Son in the Father and the Father in the Son… God the
Word, who became man for our sakes.” “Nothing, then, is hated by God, nor yet by the
Word. For both are one – that is, God. For He has said, ‘In the beginning the Word was in
God, and the Word was God.'” “The Word itself, that is the Son of God, is one with the
Father by equality of substance. He is eternal and uncreated.”
Hippolytus, Leading Presbyter at the Church in Rome (c. 205AD) “Although He endured
the cross, yet as God He returned to life, having trampled upon death.”
Origen, Famous Pupil of Clement of Alexandria (c. 225AD)
“No one should be offended that the Savior is also God, seeing God is the Father.
Likewise, since the Father is called Omnipotent, no one should be offended that the Son
of God is also called Omnipotent. For in this way, the words will be true that He says to
the Father: ‘All mine are yours, and yours are mine, and I am glorified in them.’” “The
Son is not different from the Father in substance.”
Even Pagans noted the early Believers equating Messiah with Elohim:
Pliny the Younger (61-112AD), also known as Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus, was the
governor of Bithynia (AD 112) and a Roman senator. When writing to emperor Trajan
asking for guidance on how he should treat the Believers in his province, he wrote that
Believers were “meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in
alternate verse a hymn to Christ as to a god…”
And William Lane Craig, in his book, “Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics”,
writes, “Studies by NT scholars such as Martin Hengel of Tubingen University, C.F.D.
Moule of Cambridge, and others have proved that within twenty years of the crucifixion a
full-blown Christology proclaiming Jesus as God incarnate existed…the oldest Christian
sermon, the oldest account of a Christian martyr, the oldest pagan report of the Church, and
the oldest liturgical prayer (1 Corinthians 16:22) all refer to Christ as Lord and God.”
Now let’s take a look at what the Ruach Ha Kodesh of Elohim is:
The Hebrew word for ’’Spirit,’’ or ’’Ruach,’’ is breath, wind, breeze, spirit, air, and
strength.
Acts 2:1 When the Day of Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one
place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a RUSHING, MIGHTY
WIND, AND IT FILLED THE WHOLE HOUSE where they were si ing. And there
appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. And they
were all filled with the Ruach Ha Kodesh, and began to speak with other tongues, as the
Ruach gave them u erance.
John 20:22 And when he had said this, HE BREATHED ON THEM and saith unto them,
Receive ye the Ruach Ha Kodesh.
Ezekiel 37:4 Again he said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye
dry bones, hear the word of Elohim. Thus saith Elohim YHWH unto these bones; Behold,
I WILL CAUSE BREATH TO ENTER YOU, and ye shall live.
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-not-… 9/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Ezekiel 37:9 Then said he unto me, PROPHECY UNTO THE WIND, prophesy, son of
man, and SAY TO THE WIND, Thus saith Elohim YHWH; Come from the four winds, O
breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live. So I prophesied as he
commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their
feet, an exceeding great army.
John 3:8 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Ruach is
ruach. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where
it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where
it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Ruach.
In the NIV, Zechariah 6:5 refers to the “four winds of the heavens” riding in chariots,
possibly the four winds of heaven going North, East, West and South.
The “breath” of Yahuah and the “Spirit” or Ruach of Yahuah are synonymous terms (Job
4:9; Ps. 33:6; Ps. 104:29 and 30; John 3:8; Job 27:3).
There are many ways the scriptures define the Ruach OF Elohim as impersonal:
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 10/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
If Elohim were a Trinity, surely Paul would have taught this concept. Yet we find no such
teaching in His writings.
Paul’s standard greeting in his le er to the Assemblies and to individuals was, “Grace to
you and peace from Yahuah our Father and Yahusha Messiah.” The same is true of Peter
in the salutations of both his epistles.
In all of Paul’s writings, only in 2 Corinthians 13:14 is the Ruach Ha Kodesh mentioned
along with the Father and Messiah, and there only in connection with the “fellowship of
the Ruach Ha Kodesh” in which believers share. Paul describes Elohim’s Ruach as the
unifying agent that brings us together in set-apart, righteous fellowship with one
another and with the Father and Son.
Notice that our fellowship is of the Ruach Ha Kodesh, not with the Ruach Ha Kodesh.
John 1:3 tells us, “Truly our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son, Yahusha
Messiah.”
Paul states that “there is one Yahuah, the Father…and One Yahusha Messiah” (1
Corinthians 8:6), making no mention of the Ruach Ha Kodesh as an El person.
Yahusha never spoke of the Ruach Ha Kodesh as a third Person of Elohim, but instead,
in numerous passages He spoke only of the relationship between Yahuah the Father and
Himself (Ma hew 26:39; Mark 13:32; 15:34; John 5:18, 22; etc.).
Yahusha doesn’t mention the Ruach Ha Kodesh as a person in His teachings, instead are
His many statements about Himself and the Father.
In visions of Yahuah’s throne the Father and Messiah are seen, but the Ruach Ha Kodesh
is never seen (Acts 7:55-56; Daniel 7:9-14; Revelation 4-5; 7:10).
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 11/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
The final and last book of the Scriptures to be wri en does not mention the Ruach Ha
Kodesh as an El person, but describes “a new heaven and new earth” (Revelation 21:1)
wherein “the tabernacle of Yahuah is with men, and He will dwell with them”
Here are some other things to consider about the Ruach Ha Kodesh OF Elohim:
Anchor Bible Dictionary describes the Ruach Ha Kodesh as the “manifestation of divine
presence and power perceptible especially in prophetic inspiration”
Repeatedly the Scriptures reveal that Elohim imparted El inspiration to His prophets and
servants THROUGH the Ruach Ha Kodesh.
Paul wrote that Yahuah’s plan for humanity had been “revealed by the Ruach to His
kodesh apostles and prophets” (Ephesians 3:5) and that his own teachings were inspired
by the Ruach Ha Kodesh (1 Corinthians 2:13).
Paul explains that it is through Yahuah’s Ruach that Yahuah has revealed to Believers the
things He has prepared for those who love Him.
Working through the Ruach, Yahuah the Father is the revealer of truth to those who serve
Him.
Yahusha told His followers that the Ruach Ha Kodesh, which the Father would send,
“will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you”
It is through Elohim’s Ruach within us that we gain ru’chani insight and understanding
and come to receive the very “mind of Messiah” (1 Corinthians 2:16), also referred to as
the “mind of the Ruach” (Romans 8:27).
Messiah was prophesied to have “the Ruach of wisdom and understanding, the Ruach of
counsel and might, the Ruach of knowledge and of the fear of Elohim (Isaiah 11:2).
Messiah portrayed in His personal conduct the divine a ributes of Almighty
YHWH through the power of the Ruach Ha Kodesh (1 Timothy 3:16).
The Ruach Ha Kodesh is not only the Ruachof Yahuah the Father, but it is the “Ruach of
Messiah” (Romans 8:9; Philippians 1:19). Remember that there is ONLY ONE Ruach (1
Corinthians 12:13; Ephesians 4:4).
The Father imparts the same Ruach to Believers through Messiah (John 14:26; 15:26; Titus
3:5-6), leading and enabling them to be His children and “partakers of the El nature”
(Romans 8:14; 2 Peter 1:4).
Yahuah, Who has eternal life in Himself, gives that life to others through the Ruach
(John 5:26; 6:63; Romans 8:11).
There is an account of the Ruach of Elohim, the Ruach of wisdom, the ruach of
understanding, the ruach of counsel, the ruach of might, the ruach of knowledge and the
ruach of the fear of Elohim.
By this Ruach,Yahusha is still present with those that love him (John): “I will come to
you” (14:18); “I am in you” (14:20); and “I will show myself” (14:21).
Luke 21:15 tells us that Messiah will give us “a mouth and wisdom, which all your
adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist.”
If Messiah has a Ruach and the Father has a Ruac hand the Ruach Ha Kodesh is a Ruach,
then why is their ONLY ONE Ruach? (Ephesians 4:4)
By definition, the Ruach of Yahuah is derived from Yahuah, so what comes from Yahuah
as its source cannot also be “Yahuah.”
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 12/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
In Scriptural usage, “the Ruach Ha Kodesh” is a synonymous term for “Yahuah.” In Acts
5:3, Peter says Ananias lied to “the Ruach Ha Kodesh,” but in verse 4 Peter says he lied to
“Yahuah.” This is an example of the common Semitic parallelism of equivalent terms.
“The Ruach Ha Kodesh” is equivalent to “the power of the Most High,” as Luke 1:35
(NIV) clearly indicates by another use of parallelism (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:8;10:38; Romans
15:13; Romans 15:18 and 19; 1 Corinthians. 2:4 and 5).
Ma hew 1:18 records that Mary “was found to be with child through ‘the Ruach Ha
Kodesh.’” Yet all through the New Testament are references to the fact that Yahuah is the
Father of our Yahusha. How can “Yahuah” be “the Father” and “the Ruach Ha Kodesh”
also be “the father” of Yahusha?
By this Ruach, Yahusha’s work with them would continue (John): “It will teach
you”(14:26); “It will remind you of everything I have said” (14:26); “It will testify about
me” (15:26); “It will convict the world of guilt” (in preparation for His judgment—16:8);
“It will guide you into all truth” (16:13); “It will bring esteem to me by taking what is
mine and making it known to you” (16:14).
The “Ruach Ha Kodesh” is used synonymously and interchangeably with “the Ruach of
Yahusha” (Acts 16:7; Phil. 1:19); “the Ruach of Elohim” (Luke 4:18, etc.); “the Ruach of his
Son” (Gal. 4:6); “the Ruach of Yahusha Messiah” (Phil. 1:19). In this usage, “the Ruach” is
the mind and power of Yahusha Messiah.
In Acts 16:6 (NIV), “the Ruach Ha Kodesh” kept Paul and his companions from
preaching in Asia, but in Verse 7 (NIV) it says that the “Ruach of Yahusha” would not
allow them to enter Bithynia.
2 Corinthians 3:17 and 18 says that Yahusha is “the Ruach.” He has been invested with all
ru’chani authority and power to effectively carry out His responsibility as the Head of
His body. By His “Ruach” He is able to guide and direct His many servants (2 Cor. 12:8
and 9).
Galatians 5:22 and 23 list the “fruit of the Ruach” (the nature of Yahusha); John 15:5 says,
“If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit.”
The “Ruach of your Father” is synonymous with “the Ruach Ha Kodesh,” and is said to
speak in our stead when we might be brought before men for possible persecution or
trial (Ma .10:19 and 20; Mark 13:11; Luke 12:11 and 12).
The Ruach Ha Kodesh is the very nature, presence and expression of Elohim’s power
actively working in His servants (2 Peter 1:4; Galatians 2:20).
Peter explains that “Yahuah anointed Yahusha of Nazareth with the Ruach Ha Kodesh
and with power” (Acts 10:38).
Messiah performed many miracles and worked through the apostle Paul “in mighty
signs and wonders, by the power of the Ruach of Yahuah” (Romans 15:19).
Yahusha began His ministry “in the power of the Ruach” (Luke 4:14).
Yahusha told His followers, “You shall receive power when the Ruach Ha Kodesh has
come upon you” (Acts 1:8).
Scriptures refer to the Ruach Ha Kodesh as Elohim’s El power (Zechariah 4:6; Micah 3:8).
Another example of the Ruach of Messiah: “for Yahuah hath sent forth the Ruach of His
Son into our hearts crying, Abba, Father.” (Galatians 4:6)
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 13/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Yet another example of the Ruach of Messiah: “If any man have not the Ruach of
Messiah he is none of His.” (Rom. 8:9)
We are told that the “the ruachs of the prophets are subject to the prophets” (1
Corinthians 14:32).
We are sanctified by the Ruach (2 Thess. 2:13); we are sanctified in Messiah Yahusha (1
Cor. 1:2), whom Yahuah made to be sanctification for us (1 Cor. 1:30).
We are strengthened by the Ruach in the inner man (Eph. 3:16); Messiah dwells in our
hearts (Eph. 3:17).
We have access to the Father by the Ruach (Eph. 2:18); in Messiah and through faith in
Him we have access with confidence to Yahuah (Eph. 3:12).
The Ruach apportions to each one individually as it chooses (1 Cor. 12:11); Yahusha
pours out the Ruach (Acts 2:33) and gave some apostles, some prophets, etc. (Eph. 4:11).
The Ruach intercedes for us (Rom. 8:26); Messiah Yahusha intercedes for us (Rom. 8:34).
The only verse that would indicate that there might be three persons sharing one name is
Ma hew 28:19: “…baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the
Holy Spirit.” But this verse is quoted in a different form by the early Believing Fathers,
notably Eusebius, who quotes the verse at least 18 times as follows: “baptizing them in
My name.”
Both the Father and Son are shown to send the Comforter: “But the Comforter, which is
the Ruach Ha Kodesh, whom the Father will send in my name, it shall teach you all
things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.”
John 14:26 “Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I
go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto
you.” (John 16:7) “Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity
captive, and gave gifts unto men.” (Ephesians 4:8, Acts 2:33)
The Comforter points to and esteems Messiah.
“But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the
Ruach of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:” (John 15:26)
“Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Ruach of Yahuah
calleth Yahusha accursed: and that no man can say that Yahusha is Messiah, but by the
Ruach Ha Kodesh.” (1 Corinthians 12:3)
We are told the Ruach is FROM Yahuah: “And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit
descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he
that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the
Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Ruach
Ha Kodesh. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of Yahuah. (John 1:32-34)
Elohim is said to be omnipresent by His “Ruach” (Job 31:4, Proverbs 5:20,21).
We are told that “No man hath seen Elohim at any time. If we love one another, Elohim
dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us. Hereby know we that we dwell in him,
and he in us, because he hath given us of his Ruach. And we have seen and do testify
that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world. (1 John 4:12-14)
We are told that Elohim is the Ruach: “Now Elohim is the Ruach, and where the Ruach
of Elohim is, there is liberty.” (2 Cor 3:17).
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 14/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Yahuah uses Kodesh Messengers to speak as if they were Yahuah Himself, and even to
use His personal name, Yahuah. (Judges 13:21-22, Genesis 32:24-30, Hosea 12:3-5, Exodus
3: 2-4,6 and 16, Judges 6:12,13 and 22)
The Hebrew usage of “the Ruach of Elohim” never refers to a person separate from, but a
part of, Yahuah Almighty. Neither does the phrase, “the Ruachs of Elohim” occur, which
would refer to separate Ru’chani entities within a multi-personal Elohim.
The Scriptures never tell us to pray to, lift up, praise, honor, sing to, speak to, esteem or
otherwise venerate as a sovereignty of Elohim concerning the Ruach OF Elohim.
Elohim is referred to as a Ruach (John 4:24).
While much is said by Messiah concerning His love for His Father, no such reference is
made to the Ruach.
While Scriptures mention the love the Father and Son has for Believers, no mention is
made of the love of the Ruach for them.
It should be noted that pneuma hagion often refers to the gift of Elohim
(h p://www.truthortradition.com/iphone/index.php?
option=com_content&view=article&id=111:gods-gift-holy-spirit-&Itemid=61), the El
nature born inside us. This El nature is a “thing,” not a person. Thus it should be
referred to with pronouns such as “it,” “that,” or “which,” and not “who,” or “whom.”
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 15/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Advertisements
Report this ad
Report this ad
Filed under: binitarianism, Elohim, Natsarim, religion, Set-apart One of Yisra'el, Set-Apart
Spirit of Elohim, Yahuah, Yahusha Ha'Mashiach, YHWH | Tagged: binitarianism, Catholic,
Elohim, Eternal Life, false preachers, false teachers, Great Whore, Inquisition, Mystery
Babylon, Paganism, Roman Catholic Church, Ruach Ha Kodesh, Trinity exposed, Yahuah,
Yahusha Ha'Mashiach |
« ‘Mystery Babylon,’ the ‘Great Whore’ of Revelation is Revealed! The Vatican is in Rome, Built
Within “Seven Hills” Which the “City” Sits Upon Have You Been Baptized in the Name of
“Jesus” to Wash Your Sins Away? If So, You Have Been Baptized into the GREEK Name
Transliterated From “Iesous,” Which in Hebrew Means “Horse”! YAHusha is the Messiah »
37 Responses
The trinity is absolutely a false doctrine made by the catholic church. Amazing revelation
regarding Godhead with complete scriptural evidence found at
h p://voiceofarchangel.com/topics1.php#C1
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
The Lord is One Lord, The Trinity Doctrine is False! | Its Time Now 4 U, on August 11,
2013 at 6:00 PM said:
[…] “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine […]
Reply
1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with Elohim, and the Word was
Elohim.
2 He was in the beginning with Elohim.
3 All came to be through
Him , and without Him not even one came to be that came to be.
4 In Him was life , and the life was the light of men.
5 And the light shines in the darkness , and the darkness
has not overcome it.
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 17/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
6 There was a man sent from Elohim , whose name was Yoḥanan.
7 This one came for a witness , to bear witness of the Light, that
all might believe through him.
8 He was not that Light, but that he might bear witness of that
Light.
9 He was the true Light , which enlightens every man, coming
into the world.
10 He was in the world, and the world came to be through
Him, and the world did not know Him.
11 He came to His own and His own did not receive Him.
12 But as many as received Him , to them He gave the
authority to become children of Elohim, to those believing
in His Name,
13 who were born, not of blood nor of the desire of flesh
nor of the desire of man, but of Elohim.
14 And the Word became flesh and pitched His tent among us, and we saw His esteem,
esteem as of an only brought-forth of a father,
complete in favor and truth.
15 Yoḥanan bore witness of Him and cried out, saying,“This was
He of whom I said,‘ He who comes after me has become before me,
because He was before me.’ ”
16 And out of His completeness we all did receive, and favor
upon favor,
17 for the Torah was given through Mosheh – the favor and the
truth came through OSWHY
Mashiach.
18 No one has ever seen Elohim. The only brought-forth
Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He did declare.
19 Now this was the witness of Yoḥanan when the Yahuḏim sent
from Yerushalayim kōhenim andLĕwites to ask him,“ Who are you?”
20 And he confessed and did not deny, but confessed,“I am not
ha’ Mashiach .”
21 And they asked him,“ What then, are you Ĕliyahu? ” So he said,
“I am not.” “ Are you the Naḇi?” Andhe answered,“ No.”
22 Therefore they said to him,“ Who are you, so that we give an answer to those who
sent us? What do you say about yourself?”
23 He said,“I am a voice of one crying in the wilderness,‘ Make straight the way of
HWHY,’ as the naḇi Yeshayahu said.”
24 And those sent were of the Pharisees,
25 and they asked him, saying,“ Why then do you immerse if you are not ha’ Mashiach ,
nor Ĕliyahu, nor the Naḇi?”
26 Yoḥanan answered them, saying, “I immerse in water, but in your
midst stands One whom you do not know,
27 the One coming after me, who has become before me, whose sandal strap I am not
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 18/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
worthy to loosen.”
28 This took place in Bĕyth Anyah beyond the Yardĕn, where Yoḥanan was immersing.
29 The next day Yoḥanan saw OSWHY coming toward him, and said,“ See , the Lamb of
Elohim who takes away the sin of the
world!
30 “This is He of whom I said,‘ After me comes a Man who has become before me, for
He was before me.’
31 “ And I did not know Him, but that He might be revealed to isra’ĕl, therefore I came
immersing in water.”
32 And Yoḥanan bore witness , saying,“I have seen the Ruach coming down from
shamayim like adove and remain on
Him.
33 “ And I did not know Him, but He who sent me to immerse
in water said to me,‘Upon whom you see the Ruach coming down and remaining on
Him, this is He who immerses in Ruach ha’
Qodesh.’
34 “ And I have seen and have witnessed that this is the Son of
Elohim.”
35 Again the following day, Yoḥanan was standing with two of his
talmidim,
36 and looking at OSWHY walking, he said,“ See the Lamb of Elohim!”
Note that He is the “Lamb OF Elohim, and NOT what you are teaching.
Here is a video that may help to explain that the Son and the Father consists of TWO
separate Persons. Remember that the Son will eventually be UNDER the Father AFTER
all is under the Son.
Reply
Salmon.
5 And Salmon brought forth Bo ‘az by Raḥaḇ and Bo‘az brought forth Oḇĕḏ by Ruth
and Oḇĕḏ brought forth Yishai.
6 And Yishai brought forth Dawiḏ the sovereign and Dawiḏ the sovereign brought
forth Shelomoh by Uriyah’ s wife.
7 And Shelomoh brought forth Reḥaḇ‘am and Reḥaḇ‘am brought forth Aḇiyah and
Aḇiyah brought forth
Asa.
8 And Asa brought forth Yehoshaphat and Yehoshaphat brought forth Yoram and
Yoram brought forthUzziyah.
9 And Uzziyah brought forth Yotham and Yotham brought forth Aḥaz and Aḥaz
brought forth Ḥizqiyahu.
10 And Ḥizqiyahu brought forth Menashsheh and Menashsheh brought forth Amon
and Amon brought
forth Yoshiyahu.
11 And Yoshiyahu brought forth Yeḵonyah and his brothers at the
time of the exile to Baḇel.
12 And after the exile to Baḇel, Yeḵonyah brought forth She
‘alti ‘ĕl and She ‘alti ‘ĕl brought forth Zerubbaḇel.
13 And Zerubbaḇel brought forth Aḇihuḏ and Aḇihuḏ brought forth Elyaqim and
Elyaqim brought forth Azor.
14 And Azor brought forth Tsaḏoq and Tsaḏoq brought forth Aqim and Aqim
brought forth Elihuḏ.
15 And Elihuḏ brought forth El ‘azar and El ‘azar brought forth Ma an and Ma an
brought forth Ya‘aqoḇ.
16 And Ya‘aqoḇ brought forth Yosĕph the husband of Miryam, of whom was born
OSWHY who is called Mashiach.
17 So all the generations from Aḇrahim to Dawiḏ were fourteen generations and
from Dawiḏ until theexile to Baḇel were fourteen generations and from the exile to
Baḇel until the
Mashiach were fourteengenerations.
18 But the birth of OSWHY Mashiach was as follows: After His mother Miryam was
engaged to Yosĕph, before they came together, she was found to be pregnant from
the
Ruach ha’Qodesh.
19 And Yosĕph her husband, being righteous and not wishing to make a show of
her, had in mind to put her away secretly.
20 But while he thought about this, see, a mal’akh of YHWH
appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Yosĕph, son of Dawiḏ,
do not be afraid to take Miryam as your wife, for that which is in her was brought
forth from the Ruach ha’ Qodesh.
21 “She shall give birth to a Son and you shall call His Name OSWHY for He shall
save His people from their sins.”
22 And all this came to be in order to fill what was spoken by
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 20/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Reply
Reply
Reply
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 21/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Reply
Reply
Reply
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 22/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
“The Hebrew word qodesh and the equivalent Greek word hagios, together with their
derivatives, have been translated with one of three words, or derivatives, in our older
English versions, namely: holy, hallowed, or sanctified. Another word is also used in
modern versions, and generally in ecclesiastical literature, namely: sacred. Most of us
have the idea that this word has the meaning of piety, or being pious, or to be devout.
However, this conception is refuted when we read in Isa. 66:17 of the idolatrous people
“who sanctify (qadash) themselves and purify themselves, to go to the gardens after an
idol in the midst, eating swine’s flesh and the abomination and the mouse ….” This
refutation of the incorrect idea that “holy” means “to be pious”, is further confirmed by
the shocking discovery that one of the Hebrew words for a harlot (whore) is qedeshah, a
derivative of qadash! Likewise, a male prostitute (or sodomite) is called a qadesh in
Hebrew. This then causes us to seek for the real meaning of the word qodesh (its verb
being qadash) and its Greek equivalent hagios. The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible,
vol. 2, p. 817, summarises what most authorities say about qodesh and hagios, “. . . the
meaning of ‘separation’ is paramount … the more elemental meaning seems to lie with
‘separation’.” The same dictionary, in vol. 4, p.210, says, “The basic sense of the Hebrew
root qadash, as of its Greek equivalent in the Bible—hagios, seems to be ‘separateness’.”
Likewise, Vine’s Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words repeatedly emphasises
the fact of the fundamental meaning of the word to be: “separation” (see under
“holiness” and “sanctification”). With the discovery of the true meaning of this word,
namely, separate and separation, we can now understand why qodesh is used in a
positive sense, a good sense, and that it can equally be used in a negative and evil
sense.”
Reply
Reply
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 23/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
“The English word for “God” has become a source of confusion for Christians since at
least the Anglo-Saxon era. Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary says that the origin of
the word ‘god’ comes from a Germanic word ‘gad,’ pronounced as “gohdt.”
“The following information on the origin of the word ‘god’ will help to understand why
we use it in our vernacular.
“GOD – The English word God is identical with the Anglo-Saxon word for “good,” and
therefore it is believed that the name God refers to the divine goodness. (See Oehler’s
Theol. of Old Test.; Strong’s and Young’s concordances.) (From New Unger’s Bible
Dictionary) (Originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois. Copyright (C)
1988.)
“Further information on the source of our word for ‘God’ is listed below:
“Word origin: God – Our word god goes back via Germanic to Indo-European, in which
a corresponding ancestor form meant “invoked one.” The word’s only surviving non-
Germanic relative is Sanskrit hu, invoke the gods, a form which appears in the Rig Veda,
most ancient of Hindu scriptures: puru-hutas, “much invoked,” epithet of the rain-and-
thunder god Indra. (From READER’S DIGEST, Family Word Finder, page 351)
(Originally published by The Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Pleasantville New York,
Montreal; Copyright (C) 1975)
“Now if the sources noted above are accurate, then the word that we use for the
Supreme Being, God, comes from a very pagan origin. Thus the word god is used
generically by many different religions to refer to their deity or “invoked one.”” — by
Craig Bluemel
Why do Christians call their god “God” when the Creator of the universe told humans
to tell them of His real Name? And the name “Jehovah” is NOT correct, especially since
there are no “j’s” or “v’s” in Hebrew. I started to research the name of Jehovah after
someone challenged me to do it. Here is a blog entry that will help those seeking truth.
h ps://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/have-you-been-baptized-in-the-name-of-
jesus-to-wash-your-sins-away-if-so-you-have-been-baptized-into-the-greek-name-
transliterated-from-iesous-which-in-hebrew-means-horse-yahusha-i/
Reply
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 24/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
God Bless you all but really you even have to be careful with scrolls especially from leaders
of Israel of Jesus time because even they were tampered with and some scrolls missing. The
Vatican isn’t the only one that is guilty of that although the RCC is the worst and the
proven whore (Mystery Babylon The Great) and when she is revealed God will punish her
by pu ing in the minds of man to make war with her and she shall have torment 7 fold for
in one day she will be left desolate and u erly burned. And then Christ Jesus comes to reap
the world of his sheep, those left behind during the calling of the dead and living saints but
la er gave their hearts and lives to God through Jesus Christ, these will be reaped but the
angel will reap those who had drink of the wrath of God which are those who fallow The
anti Christ (Satan) false prophet (Pope of the Roman Catholic Church) he who appears as a
lamb but speaks in the tongue of the dragon (Satan) the defector of the Church all are
thrown into the bo omless pit, the lake of fire but Satan is locked away for 1000 years and
is loosed for a li le season to gather those left on earth who had fallen to his wicked
deception and the end of the age is complete this is after the 1000 year reign of Christ then
the earth the heavens and the sun and moon go away into darkness and pass away from the
face of God and makes all things new. The world will be remodeled without oceans nor a
sun or moon because the Glory of God alone brightens the world and we will be his sons
and daughters and he will be our God forever and ever amen…
Reply
Reply
Reply
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 25/32
7/21/2018 p The
y “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Reply
Reply
If it is be er that the Helper come and Yeshua leave….how could it be if it is not just
as much a person as The Father and the Son are….
Enough
Reply
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 26/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
My entry gives great detail providing Scripture that shows that the Set-Apart
Spirit of Elohim is not a person, but a thing. The word ‘holy’ is derived from the
word ‘halo,’ as in ‘halo around the sun.’ The early Believers never even discussed
a so-called trinity, though this trinity is actually Nimrod, Tammuz and
Semiramis, where Nimrod/Tammuz is the ‘Eternal Sun.’ The halo that Christians
use in their artwork is a tribute to Nimrod, as are the ‘halo days,’ which now are
called ‘holidays.’ The reason why the Son’s Name is Yahusha/Yahushua is
because it means ‘Yah is our Salvation,’ and is in line with ‘halleluYah, the
nickname ‘Yah’ that is used in Scripture for the Father, the tribe of Yahudah, and
also know that the Jewish Masoretes changed the vowels from an ‘a’ to an ‘e.’
Elohim is Spirit, and where His Spirit is is everywhere, using it to be a Comforter
and Helper to those that love Elohim. The word ‘holy’ does certainly not convey
what YHWH wrote through man, but ‘set-apart is what we are to be to the
profane. Please, if you have any questions, let me know. Thank you.
Reply
Do Christians Tell Lies? Take This Test To See If You Are Spreading Falsehoods On
Accident — Or On Purpose! | Gospel of Yahusha Ha'Mashiach, The Gift of Eternal Life,
on December 19, 2013 at 9:31 AM said:
[…] 777denny on The “Trinity” Is A… […]
Reply
Reply
Reply
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 27/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Whores?: “Come Out From Among Them And Be Ye Separate, Says YHWH” | Gospel of
Yahus, on January 6, 2014 at 7:48 PM said:
[…] Why is Christianity… on The “Trinity” Is A… […]
Reply
Reply
Then God said, “Let Us make man ‘in Our image, according to Our likeness’; let them have
dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the ca le, over all the
earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” Genesis 1:26
God was speaking with majestic authority thus using Us/Our in Gen1:26.
God said clearly “in Our Image according to Our likeness” referring to mankind becoming
rulers and creators on earth. Not by any means using the physical of God to create shape of
man and female, but rather figure-like to that of God having dominance over universe, but
for mankind they having dominance over other living creature on earth.
And God created man ‘in His (verse do Not use THEIR) own image, in the image of God’
created He him; male and female created He them. Genesis 1:27
And if we use Pauline-Christian logic. Whose image was verse referring to? Father? As
Christians should know that Word and Spirit do not have image.
Do Christians believe Father/Word/Holy Spirit have image or all three were imageless?
Reply
Scriptures of Elohim and partly on Constantine’s other Pagan religious beliefs. The Set-
Apart Spirit of Elohim is not a person, but a thing. The trinity of Nimrod, Semiramis and
Tammuz are woven throughout the Christian religion, with Easter representing Ishtar,
another name for Semiramis, Santa representing Woden, another name for Nimrod, and
Easter has them facing east, which Elohim did not command men to do. The Christmas
tree is actually a Tammuz Tree, and everything from the 12 Days of Christmas to
caroling to gift-giving to the Yule Log and Mistletoe and tree ornaments, along with the
kind of tree brought into the house, are all Babylonian-inspired tribute to Nimrod,
Tammuz and Semiramis. And the beam of Messiah NOT being a ‘cross,’ but a pole, with
the ‘T’ representing Tammuz prior to Christians finally using it. Christianity also
adopted other religious symbols that can be traced back to Babylon, including the dove,
the fish, the Mother and Child, the Shepherd — and even the garb of orthodox
Christianity mirroring Babylonian garb.And just to let everyone KNOW FOR SURE,
please understand that according to Scripture, those who suppress the truth by turning
away from it shall not find the Way to Life that they think they will find at the end…
Reply
Reply
Christmas: The Truth Your Pastor Refuses to Tell You Concerning the Pagan (Nimrodic)
Roots of Christmas(s) | Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha Ha'Mashiach, The Gift of
Eternal Life, on October 2, 2014 at 8:35 AM said:
[…] 777denny on The “Trinity” Is A… […]
Reply
Reply
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 29/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
Reply
Reply
Isaiah 9:6,”For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be
upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God,
The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.”
As the phrase, his name shall be called…The mighty God, is mentioned above, the Old
Testament even supports that Jesus Christ is God Himself.
Reply
Now think: how is it possible for Yahuah Elohim, the Father, to send a “3rd person” in the
so called “Trinity” to beget a Son, but when that Son is born, He shall be called the Son of
Elohim – Yahuah, the Father?
NEVER EVER was Yahusha called.. ANYWHERE.. the Son of the “Holy Spirit”!
The Spirit is the POWER of YHUH Elohim!
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 30/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
“Elohim” is also plural because it consists of the Father and His Son.
AND:
When Yahusha said in John 10:30: I AND the Father ARE ONE!… why did He not include
the “Holy Spirit” as the 3rd person in Their unity!?
Thus: the Father is NOT the Son, and there is NOT a 3rd person!
There is: our Father, Yahuah, and He has a SON, Yahusha, Who came IN His Father’s
Name!
YAHUah
YAHUsha
You can’t get “Jesus” in the pagan titles: Lord or God!
Kyrios Christianity, Wilhem Bousset, p.295 – “…Ma . 28:19 Trinitarian formula was later
inserted.”
The same goes for: 1 John 5:7-8 – These verses was not found in any manuscript before the
1600’s. The original verse was wri en as this:
:7 ~ “There are three that bear witness,
:8 ~ “The Spirit, the water and the blood, these three agree in one”
The rest was added.
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 31/32
7/21/2018 The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine, Elohim Consists of the Father and the Son; The “Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim” Is Not A “Person,” But is the…
It was a FOOTNOTE known as the: “Comma Johanneum” and was added to the original
text in 1522 by a Dutch catholic, Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus in the 3rd Edition of the
Textus Receptus – [Received Text]
Reply
As you know, YAHUAH does NOT let man esteem man, but ALWAYS Elohim — INSTEAD
ALWAYS AND FOREVERMORE — and the pride of man goeth before a fall.
Reply
WP Designer.
https://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/the-trinity-is-a-false-doctrine-elohim-consists-of-the-father-and-the-son-the-set-apart-spirit-of-elohim-no… 32/32