Dear Ms.

Afrin Fauzya Rizana

We are pleased to inform you that your paper referenced below has
been Accepted (with Major Revision required) for presentation and
publication in the proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on
Instrumentation Management Automation Control Systems and
Informatics (IMACSI) (IMACSI 2018) which will be held during 8-10
August 2018 at Ibis Styles Bandung Braga Hotel, Bandung, Indonesia:

- Paper No : 1570451048
- Title : The Role of Individual Characteristic in Encouraging User
Performance and Continuance Usage Decision of Interprise System
- Authors : Afrin Fauzya Rizana, amelia Kurniawati, Rayinda Pramuditya
Soesanto, Fadillah Ramadhan

The reviewers' comments on your paper can be accessed by log-in to

IMACSI's Online Submission Site at https://edas.info/N24710 . It is
important that any critical comments therein are adequately addressed
and taken into account in the final version of the paper submitted for
inclusion in the conference proceedings.

We now request you to submit the final camera-ready format of your

paper by 27 July 2018 through the conference website
at https://edas.info/N24710. In order to prepare the final version, please
use the final paper template and refer to the final submission guideline
available at http://imacsi.org/paper-submission/

In summary, the final submission requires that at least one of the authors
completes the following four (4) tasks:
1) Completion of the Conference Registration
2) Submission of the final, camera-ready version of the paper both in
native (MS Word/Latex) and IEEE Xplore-compatible PDF versions
3) Submission of the result of IEEE PDF Express compatibility check
4) Submission the signed IEEE Copyright Transfer Form

Since the final version will become available at IEEE Xplore, it is very
important to make it compatible with the standard of IEEE. Please do not
forget to read the guideline carefully and proceed accordingly. Following
the policy of the IEEE, a no-show paper will be automatically excluded
from the post-conference proceedings submitted to IEEE Xplore.

If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us

by email at secretariat-imacsi2018@imacsi.org

We look forward to receiving your final paper and seeing you in

Bandung, Indonesia this August.

With best regards,

------------------
Endra Joelianto, TPC Chair

The 2018 International Conference on Instrumentation Management

Automation Control Systems and Informatics (IMACSI)

==========================
======= Paper review 1 =======

Originality Significance of Topic Presentation Familiarity Recommendation

Weak Accept (6) Weak Accept (6) Weak Accept (6) Familiar (4) Weak Accept (7)

> *** Strengths/Weakness (What are the major reasons to accept/reject the
paper?

The paper presents a study using collected data fro ERP assessment.

> ***Contribution/s & Detailed comments (What are the major issues
addressed in the paper? Do you consider them important? Comment on
the degree of novelty, creativity and technical depth in the paper. Please
provide detailed comments that will be helpful to the TPC for assessing the
paper, as well as feedback to the authors.)

The paper has presented interesting results. However there are many
materials are not included in the paper, such as equations for analysis,
graphical analysis of the data and the analysis, discussion of the results.
The authors are required to improve the presentation of the paper by
adding that items.

======= Paper review 2 =======

Significance of
Originality Presentation Familiarity Recommendation
Topic
Accept (8) Weak Accept (6) Accept (8) Familiar (4) Accept (8)

> *** Strengths/Weakness (What are the major reasons to accept/reject the
paper?

The paper is interesting and can be accepted in academics ways but the
benefit to an enterprise system is not clear. Therefore, please add the
problem owner, problem user, decision maker, and what kind of decision
can be implemented in the system under discussion. In order to add the
novelty of the paper, please add some new building block diagram of
research contribution. I do not understand about the statement after
Table III ".......enjoyment in using the system also can be considered as
a way to increase user's intrinsic motivation". In my opinion, this
statement is out of the scope of the variables in the structural model and
should be carefully stated since further study should be conducted.

> ***Contribution/s & Detailed comments (What are the major issues
addressed in the paper? Do you consider them important? Comment on
the degree of novelty, creativity and technical depth in the paper. Please
provide detailed comments that will be helpful to the TPC for assessing the
paper, as well as feedback to the authors.)

Some grammar mistakes exist in the paper Please be consistent for

using present tenses or past tenses on the sentences. In Figure 1 as
well as in the hypotheses, please explain in a more details, which
concepts/hypotheses are new and which ones are taken from the
previous literature. Please add some explanations about sampling
methods (probability/non-probability sampling,
convenience/stratified/random sampling methods, etc.) Please remove
"Master Degree or Above Educational" Level option in Table 1 since it is
0%. Please explore the data from Table 1 for Discriminant Analysis or
other Multivariate Analysis. Please revise reference number [17]. The
2009 are doubled. Also, be consistent in writing the reference in
numerical order, do not have to mention author name (i.e. Rizana and
Govindaraju & Park, Suh, and Yang on page 2, Ko, Kirsch, and King on
page 3, and many more on page 3)

======= Paper review 3 =======

Originality Significance of Topic Presentation Familiarity Recommendation

Weak Accept (6) Weak Accept (6) Weak Accept (6) Some knowledge (2) Weak Accept (7)

> *** Strengths/Weakness (What are the major reasons to accept/reject the
paper?

The paper identifies the ability of enterprise system to improve the user's
performance. English should be improved, there are some sentences
that are not complete in terms of subject, predicate, etc.

> ***Contribution/s & Detailed comments (What are the major issues
addressed in the paper? Do you consider them important? Comment on
the degree of novelty, creativity and technical depth in the paper. Please
provide detailed comments that will be helpful to the TPC for assessing the
paper, as well as feedback to the authors.)

The paper presents interesting research results. However, the

presentation of the paper should be improved. The structural model
should be explained to show the clarity, even though it is already shown
in Figure 2. This also should be applied to the modified structure.
Moreover, the differences between structures (the existing and the
modified) should be justified. Moreover, the presentation of the tables
should be clearer, showing the main contributions of the paper.

> ***Comments for TPC members only (Write any additional comments for
TPC members only. Refrain from duplicating those in detailed comments.
The authors will not see these comments.)
The paper is a fair conference paper. The presentation can be improved.