A

PROJECT REPORT
ON

AI ANSWER VERIFIER
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Bachelor of Engineering in “Information Technology”

By:

Name of Students ID Nos.

Nishit Nirbhavane VU4F1314012
Sharda Mahajan VU4S1516037
Ashutosh Shinde VU4S1415027
Vikas Katkar VU4S1415013
Supervisor:

Prof. Supriya Chaudhary (Name of the guide)

Department of Information Technology

Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Pratishthan’s College of Engineering

Vasantdada Patil Educational Complex, Eastern Express Highway, Near Everard

Nagar, Sion-Chunabhatti, Mumbai – 400022.

UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
April, 2018
 CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the project entitled “AI Answer Verifier” is a bonafide work
of “Nishit Nirbhavane” (VU4F1314012),”Sharda
Mahajan”(VU4S1516037),”Ashutosh Shinde”(VU4S1415027), “Vikas
Katkar”(VU4F1011034) submitted to the University of Mumbai in partial
fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of “Bachelor of
Engineering” in “Information Technology”.

(Supriya Chaudhary) (Pravin Patil)

Guide Co-Guide

Prof. Supriya Chaudhary Dr. Alam N. Shaikh

Head of Department Principal

 Project Report Approval for B. E.
This project report entitled “AI Answer Verifier” by “Nishit Nirbhavane”,‘‘Sharda
Mahajan”,‘‘Ashutosh Shinde”, “Vikas Katkar” is approved for the degree of
“Bachelor of Engineering” in “Information Technology”.

Examiners

1.---------------------------------------------

2.---------------------------------------------

Date:

Place: Mumbai - 22
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We the students from Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Pratishthan’s College of engineering,

Mumbai of Final Year Engineering in the department of ‘Information Technology’ have great
pleasure in presenting our efforts of developing the project named as
“AI Answer Verifier”.

The success of our project on whole does not depend on an individual student but on the creative
team work of entire group & faculty members. This would have difficult by an individual. So we
wish & acknowledge the precious guidance from those who willingly supported to us to make
this project.

We are grateful to Prof. Supriya Chaudhary HOD (IT) for giving us inspiration,
timely guidance and valuable suggestions during the course of project. We are specially thankful
to Prof. Supriya Chaudhary for guiding us throughout project work.

Lastly, we express our sincere thanks to Mrs. Prachi Kshirsagar, Prof.supriya

chaudhary, Prof. Shrikanth Sanas, Prof. Vijaya Sagvekar, Prof. Smruti Patil, Prof.
Darshana Tambe and Prof. Seema Ladhe for guiding us through the entire course.
 ABSTRACT

Many architectures and features have been proposed for descriptive answer evaluation. There is
no standardized software to award marks/grades for the answer given. Scope of System
Subjective Answer Evaluation System was a system that was developed with an intention to
evaluate subjective answers written online. This system will reduce the manual efforts required
for correcting answers. The following steps explain the working of the system. The system can
check only five different answers of the student .The proposed system was a system that would
seek to implement an application which will be able to evaluate the subjective answer to a
question. It will allot the marks according to the percentage of accuracy present in the answer.
This system was a software system in which user will be authenticated by using user login. After
the authentication, users will be provided with the questions.

Submitted by:

Name of Student ID No.

Nishit Nirbhavane VU4F1314012
Sharda Mahajan VU4S1516037
Ashutosh Shinde VU4S1415027
Vikas Katkar VU4S1415013
 Table Of Contents
Caption Page

List of Figures Ii
List of Tables Ii

1. Introduction

1.1 Background 1
1.2 Motivation 2
1.3 Problem Definition 2
1.4 Scope 3
1.5 Objectives and outcomes 3
1.6 Customers and Users 4
1.7 limitations 4

2.Literature Survey

2.1 Existing System related to answer evaluation 5

2.2 Paper1 5
2.2.1 Description 5
2.2.2 Disadvantages 6
2.3 Paper2 6
2.3.1 Description 6
2.3.2 Disadvantages 7

3.Proposed System

3.1 Problem Statement 9

3.2 Features And Advantages 10
3.3System Requirements 10
3.4Process Model 11
3.5 Feasibility Study 11

4.Design

4.1Architectural Design 12
4.2Data Flow Diagram 17
4.3Use Case Diagram 19
4.4Sequence Diagram 20
5.Implementation Plan

5.1Implementation Plan For Sem VII 21

5.2Implementation Plan For Sem VIII 22
5.3Timeline Chart 23
5.4Conclusion and Future Scope 24

6.Software Testing
6.1 Test Plan 25
6.1.1 Unit Testing 26
6.1.2 Integration Testing 27
6.1.3 System Testing 28
6.1.4 Validation Testing 29

7.Experimental Result 30
7.1 Screenshot for login 31
7.1.2 Screenshot For Student Login 32
7.1.3 Screenshot For Dashboard 33
7.1.4 UI For Adding & Deleting a Question 34
7.1.5 UI For Student 35
7.1.6 Result 36

8.Conclusion & Future Scope 31

Appendix Code Sample 33

References 34
 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No. Caption Page No.

3.4.1 Waterfall Model 11

4.1 Architectural Design 12
4.2.1 Level 0 DFD 17
4.2.2 Level 1 DFD 18
4.3 Use Case Diagram 19
4.4 Sequence Diagram 20

LIST OF TABLES

Table No. Caption Page No.

4.1.5 Marking Scheme 16

4.1.5.1 Distribution Of marks 16
4.1.5.2 Marking Scheme 16
5.1 Implementation Plan for Sem VII 22
5.2 Implementation Plan for Sem VIII 23
5.3 Timeline Chart 24