Professional Documents
Culture Documents
James Chong
51866405
Writing 39C
Education is without a doubt one of the most important things in one’s life. The United
States government sets up a mandatory education system, almost as an investment, for hopes
that young children, starting in kindergarten, will make a large impact when they mature. What is
unseen however, is the many hidden factors at home that will affect their behavior and learning
process. In this day and age, the most prominent factor is technology. Just 7 years ago, only
41% of each household in the United States, owned a smartphone, and now, just last year that
number has shot up to 95% (Rideout 3). Technology may not seem all that bad considering is
has provided the education with system online courses, homeschooling, and resourcefulness,
but in actuality only 3% of all digital media time is spent on creating and expanding the mind
(Rideout 13). This means only 3% of the time are students (but not limited to) writing an essay,
reading, or drawing a picture. Because advance mobile technology has not been around for
very long, so there is no hard evidence that proves mobile devices are changing the way
children think, but there are many studies done that show correlations and short term effects.
Because mobile technology has not been popularized and widely used until 2005, the target of
this paper will be children and teenagers, ranging from zero to thirteen years of age. This age
group is chosen due to the fact that the young teenagers and children grew up with the mobile
devices, never without them. In fact, the average screen time of children from zero to eight now
is two hours and nine minutes daily. Compared to 2011, that is nine times the amount a child
spent on a mobile device (Rideout 14). There is no doubt that mobile technology has a larger
impact on younger, developing students now than it ever has. As Generation Z ages with
technology, it is prevalent in many correlational studies as well as theorists that the use of social
2
media, mobile devices, and the internet negatively affects the development of the adolescent
brain and thus changes their behavior and hinders their educational experience for 3 main
notifications, and a loss of attention span from addiction. It is also important to note that
technology is an extremely broad topic, but this paper will be specifically focusing on the mobile
To begin, all social media has a function when someone shares an idea, picture, or
“likes” and feel a sense of happiness when their post gets recognition and 40% of those people
say that the happiness only lasts if people continue to “like” (Tait). As people value likes, it
propels the users to post more excessively to feel happiness obtained from their “likes”.
Because users consistently and constantly post a portion of their lives to get the recognition
from their online peers via “likes” and comments”, it develops a dependence on the attention
and praise from others. In a sense, users lose their own sense of internal satisfaction in their
experiences, including school work. Since the release of smartphones, teenagers have
recorded an increase of 65% in suicide rates and and increase of 58% in female depression
(Walton). It is no coincidence that teenage females use social media three times more than
teenage males (Rideout 14), showing correlation in usage and depression rates. This is an
issue for the current education system because as parents allow their children access to social
media, their intrinsic motivation will deplete and the student will only work for someone else’s
3
praise. As they grow up they will not feel self-accomplished if they base their gratification on
someone else. Students should be proud of their own creation, whether it be an essay, a
drawing, or any project. Users should post to share what they are confident in, not to post to
gain confidence. If students grow up craving the attention from others, they will never reach self-
According to the same survey by CNN mentioned earlier, the average user checks their
phone 4 times every 10 minutes (LaMotte). This is due to the constant ringing that notifications
come with. In other survey by The New York Times 72% of teenagers feel an urge and are
cellular phone and the notifications that come with it are without a doubt addicting. In fact, there
is even a new word “nomophobia” for people who get anxiety from being separated from their
phone. The reason behind the addictive nature of a mobile phone is simple: the device and its
connection with social media will ring the phone and calls out to the user to check their phone.
Whenever a “notification” is sent, the nature of the human mind is to release endorphins, the
chemical directly in charge of motivation and reward, which triggers happiness instantly
(LaFata). This leads to the user to respond to the notification, which may result in another
notification; thus, the loop of phone addiction continues. The issue with constant notifications is
that humans will lose their sense of long-term gratification. Because the short term happiness
from notifications are easy to obtain, users will be fixated on gaining happiness quickly, and will
not see the satisfaction from completing long-term goals and aspirations. For example, say a
student would not keep up on readings for the chapter quizzes on the student’s book. Instead,
he or she uses his or her phone to quickly look at Sparknotes, a summary website, the period
before his quiz and performs well. However, when the whole book test comes, the student will
not retain any of the knowledge or details and fail the test. The student can not prepare because
he or she had been rewarded for cheating, and did not change his habits because the student
could only see the short term benefits that SparkNotes gave him. Short-gratification can also
4
lead to a loss of curiosity and problem solving. Because the internet is just a search away, when
students encounter a problem, the easy, fast, and simple way to figure out a solution would be
to “Google” the problem. This detracts from students truly understanding the material and
course work and instead just solving the issue for the time being.
On a related note, Dr. Hyung Suk Seo from Korea University, did research on addicted
teens, in which he concluded that the area for the top-down attention control, gray matter, was
smaller in addicts. Their GABA receptors and balance were also unstable, resulting in
anxiousness as well as moodiness (LaMotte). This directly correlates to the amount of control a
user will have over their own attention, in this case, addicted users will have a smaller attention
span to pay attention in class, or anything other than their phone. The good new however, is
that when the addicted subjects went under mental-health therapy, their GABA levels went back
down to normal after nine weeks. This suggests that addiction and behavior change from
technology is temporary and can be reverted. This poses a solution to prevent the downfall of
the Generation Z.
From another perspective, many others will argue that technology has done nothing but
benefit the education sector. It is true that many tablets are being integrated into classrooms
from kindergarten to high school as replacements for computers. Tablets are cheaper, more
user friendly, and more convenient to use to to their size compared to Personal Computers (PC)
or laptops. In addition, many educational systems are being integrated into tablets via
applications. This way it makes it easier for younger students to navigate and use through the
touch screen. The issue with tablets in the classroom, however, is that students will naturally be
drawn to using other applications on the tablet. This defeats the purpose of using the tablet for
educational purposes. Mobile cell phones also have use in the classroom. Because most
students have cellular phones, it is simple for students to set reminders or take pictures when
needed. For example, if a teacher writes down review material or important dates on the
classroom board, is is as easy as a picture for the student to remember such dates. In addition,
5
assuming the majority of a classroom will have a mobile phone, the classroom can engage in
“Kahoot”, an online quiz website. Many teachers have utilized the website because it allows for
the whole class to participate at the same time and receive feedback instantaneously. The
drawback for this is that, during this time students are allowed to use their phones, and there is
no guarantee that students will not be distracted by their own phones. Phones can also
negatively affect the classroom environment. As students with phones have access to internet
so easily, cheating is something that is unavoidable. Even with restriction of phone usage in
class, students may not listen and continue to cheat and use their phones in an unproductive
way.
Limiting screen time at home is essential to stop the constant need for gratification, and
of course, less exposure means that the chances of addiction are also lower. There is a balance
to using social media and engaging one’s mind elsewhere, but that all starts with the correct use
of social media and mobile devices. Using social media to share ideas, take other’s perspective,
build relationships, and asking questions rather than eliciting and expecting the positive
responses of a “like” is a step forward for Generation Z for their education than personal gain.
Social media was meant for engaging people’s mind and making others curious, not the other
way around. Although technology has brought benefits to the education system, such as online
classes and research databases, its subtle effects in a household can change the way a student
thinking, and shortening of attention span through the use of social media and devices.
6
Bibliography
Rideout, Vicky. “The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens |
Common Sense Media.” Common Sense Media: Ratings, Reviews, and Advice, Common
Rideout, Vicky. “Media Usage by Kids Age Zero to Eight.” VJR Consulting , 2017,
vjrconsulting.com/children-media/.
Tait, Amelia. “‘Both Hugely Uplifting and Depressing’: How Do Social Media Likes Affect
media/2017/01/both-hugely-uplifting-and-depressing-how-do-social-media-likes.
Walton, Alice G. “Phone Addiction Is Real -- And So Are Its Mental Health Risks.” Forbes,
addiction-is-real-and-so-are-its-mental-health-risks/.
LaMotte, Sandee. “Smartphone Addiction Could Be Changing Your Brain.” CNN, Cable
study/index.html.
Homayoun, Ana. “Is Your Child a Phone 'Addict'?” The New York Times, The New York
addict.html.
LaFata, Alexia. “Generation Notification: Why Our Brains Literally Love Notifications.”
Elite Daily, Elite Daily, 20 June 2018, www.elitedaily.com/life/generation-notification-science-
behind-notifications-obsessed/866812.