Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF LAW
Course Outline in
PART I – OBLIGATIONS
PART I-A
I. General Provisions
1
3. Quasi-Contract, NCC 1160
2
ii. Accessory obligation - included in the obligation to
give a determinate thing:
Take care of the thing to be delivered with the diligence of a
good father of the family:
3
De Guia v. Manila Electric Co., 40 Phil. 706 (1920)
US v. Barias, 23 Phil. 434 (1912)
Sarmiento v. Sps. Cabrido, 401 SCRA 122 (2003)
Crisostomo v. CA, 409 SCRA 528 (2003)
Kinds of delay
4
Foundation v Santos, G.R. No. 153004, Nov. 4,
2004
Vasquez v Ayala Corp., G.R. No. 149734, Nov.
19, 2004
Agner v BPI, G.R. No. 182963, June 3, 2013
4. Remedies of creditors
7
d. Accion Directa, NCC 1652, 1729, 1608, 1893
1. Pure obligations
2. Conditional obligations
Types of Conditions
a. As to effect on obligation-
b. As to cause or origin-
i. Potestative
(ii) Casual
(iii) Mixed
Types of Period/Term
9
(d) As to definiteness - Definite and Indefinite
(a) Kinds
(c) Loss/Impossibility
1. Single
2. Joint
3. Solidary
1. Divisible
2. Indivisible
Rivelisa Realty v. First Sta. Clara Builders, G.R. No. 189618, January
15, 2014
PART I-B -
Definition - 1232
How made
11
Ways - 1233, 1248-1250
No substitution - 1244-1246
Costs/expenses - 1247
1. As to prestation
(a) Identity
Exceptions:
(ii) Novation
12
International Hotel Corp. v. Joaquin, GR No.
158361, April 10, 2013
(2) As to parties
13
Marquez v. Elisan Credit, G.R. No. 194642, April 06,
2015
1. Impossibility of Performance
(a) Original
(b) Supervening
1. Subjective or Personal
2. Objective or real
3. Mixed
Q. Unilateral Withdrawal
15
S. Rebus Sic Stantibus, NCC 1267
T. Want of Interest
U. Judicial Insolvency
PART II - CONTRACTS
PART II-A
I. General Provisions
Stages of contracts:
Bugatti v. CA, 343 SCRA 335 (2000)
B. Characteristics
Exceptions:
R.S. Tomas, Inc. v Rizal, G.R. No. 173155, March 21, 2012
17
C. Elements of a Contract
18
E. Essential Requisites of Contracts - 1318-1319
a) Consent freely given
Offer and Acceptance;
Advertisement is not an offer but an invitation to make an offer;
Qualified acceptance; counter-offer;
Capacity to give consent:
i. If one party is a minor and the other is not, the
contract is voidable
ii. If both parties are minors, the contract is
unenforceable
Vices of consent
i. Mistake - 1330-1334 - Sps. Theis
v. CA, GR No. L-126013, February 12, 1997
ii. Violence and Intimidation - 1335-1337
Martinez v. Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank, 15
Phil. 252 (1910)
iii. Fraud - 1338-1346
International Corporate Bank v. Gueco, 351 SCRA
516
Two kinds of fraud:
Dolo causante; requisites
Tankeh v. DBP et al., GR No. 171428, Nov. 11,
2013
Dolo incidente -
Usual exaggeration does not vitiate consent:
Songco v. Sellner, 37 Phil. 254 (1917)
Simulation:
JR Blanco v. Quasha, 318SCRA373 (1999)
Cruz v. Bancom Finance Corp., 379 SCRA 490 (2002)
b) Object certain - 1347-1349
J.L.T. Agro v. Balansag, GR No. 141882, March 11,
2005
c) Cause of the obligation- 1350-1355
19
A. For validity -
B. For enforceability - Statute of Fraud Art. 1403
C. For registrability
F. Classification of Contracts
(a) Preparatory
(b) Principal
(c) Accessory
2. According to perfection
(a) Consensual
(b) Real
3. According to form
4. According to purpose
(a) Things
(b) Services
(a) Bilateral
(b) Unilateral
20
7. According to cause
(a) Onerous
(b) Gratuitous
8. According to risk
(a) Commutative
(b) Aleatory
9. According to name
(a) Nominate
(b) Innominate, NCC 1307
PART II-B -
V. Defective Contracts
21
Oria v McMicking, 21 Phil 243 (1912)
Siguan v Lim, 318 SCRA 725 (1999)
Velarde v CA, 361 SCRA 56 (2001)
Miguel v Montanez, G.R. No. 191336, January 25, 2012
Ada v Baylon, G .R. No. 182435, August 13, 2012
22
Iglesia v Heirs Of Bernardino Taeza, G.R. No. 179597, Feb. 3,
2014
1. NCC 1345-1346
2. NCC 1490-1491
3. NCC 1378
4. NCC 1409
5. NCC 1422
6. NCC 1782
7. FC 87
Contracts of Adhesion