You are on page 1of 8

Exercise No.

2
Ternary Systems

Gerry Mark S. Gubantes, John Patricia Mae Centeno, Joshua P. Movilla, Jo Darryl Fillaro, Jose Carmelo
P. Tinio, Alyssa Zen Aguillana
Date Performed: February 07, 2018; Date Submitted: February 14, 2018; 2L; Sir King Bryan Gabog

Abstract

In this exercise, a Gibbs-Roozeboom diagram was constructed representing


CH3COOH-H2O-CHCl3 mixture. A system of acetic acid-water-chloroform
forms two separate layers since two of the components: water-acetic acid and
acetic acid-chloroform are completely miscible, while one pair is partially
immiscible (water-chloroform). The binodal curve was generated
experimentally via turbidimetric titration of known amounts of each component.
Mixtures outside the binodal curve are homogeneous whereas mixtures within
the binodal curve are heterogeneous in nature. Also, tie lines, plait point and
delta point were determined and located in the diagram. The plait point was
determined to be 37% Acetic acid, 5% water, and 58% chloroform.

I. Introduction third. The distance from each apex to the


center of the opposite side of the equilateral
Gibb’s phase rule describes the relationship triangle is divided into 100 parts,
among the number of degrees of freedom (F), corresponding to weight percentage
the number of components (C), and the composition. The composition corresponding
number of phases (P) at equilibrium: to a given point is readily obtained by
measuring the perpendicular distance to the
F=C–P+2 Equation 2.1 three sides. By this method, any composition
of a three-component system can be
For a ternary component (three-component) represented by a point within the triangle.
system in one phase, Gibbs’ phase rule Refer to Figure 2.1 (Castellan, 1983).
predicts four degrees of freedom.

F= 3 – 1 + 2
F=4

However, a system of four variables cannot be


graphically represented on paper, thus, study
of ternary systems are carried out at constant
temperature and pressure. By doing this, the
degrees of freedom will be reduced to two
(F=2). This can then be represented using
Gibbs and Roozeboom method (Levine,
2002).
Figure 2.1. Gibbs-Roozeboom diagram.
The Gibbs-Roozeboom method is done by
plotting the molar fraction of each component When three components are mixed in certain
of a ternary system in the triangular ratios, two separate layers result if two of the
coordinates with equal sides. Knowing the liquids are completely miscible and one pair is
weight fractions of two components fixes the partially miscible. When a sufficient number of
data points representing the two separate
layers are plotted on the Gibbs-Roozeboom The solutions were then titrated with H2O (B)
diagram, a binodal curve which encloses the until the desired end point. Solution 4 was
“region of immiscibility” can be constructed titrated first.
(Davidson et al., 1941).
Three 50 g mixtures containing all three
components (CH3COOH-H2O-CHCl3) were
This specific exercise aims to construct a
prepared such that the compositions were
Gibbs-Roozeboom diagram representing a
found within the two-phase region of the
three-component system and to explain the
diagram. Proportion of each component
behavior of the system in terms of various
indicated in Table 2.3 was specifically
molecular interactions present.
followed.
II. Methodology Table 2.3. Preparation of mixtures for
determination of tie lines.
Five 25.0-mL solutions, each containing point vol. A, mL vol. B, mL vol. C, mL
CH3COOH-H2O (A-B) at carrying 1 4.76 15.58 18.66
concentrations 20, 30, 40, 60, and 70 %v/v 2 7.15 15.07 18.66
CH3COOH were prepared by following the 3 9.53 12.56 18.66
proportions indicated on Table 2.1. 4 11.91 10.05 18.66
Table 2.1. Preparation of CH3COOH-H2O (A- Each mixture was allowed to equilibrate in a
B) mixture.
250-mL separatory funnel at 25 °C. The
sol’n no. %A (v/v) vol. A, mL vol. B, mL
conjugate phases were separated and were
1 20 2.5 10
transferred into 125-mL Erlenmeyer flasks.
2 30 3.75 8.75
3 40 5 7.5 1 M stock NaOH solution was standardized by
4 60 7.5 5 weighing 0.25 g KHP and dissolving in water.
5 70 8.75 3.75 Two-three drops of phenolphthalein indicator
was added to the solution and was then
Each solution was titrated (2 trials) with CHCl3 titrated to phenolphthalein end point.
(C) until the first sign of turbidity was observed,
i.e., appearance of a second phase. Solution Densities of the conjugate phases were
no. 4 was first titrated to familiarize with the measure using pycnometer. Whereas the %
desired end point. w/w CH3COOH in each conjugate phases
were determined by titration with the
Another five 25.0-mL solutions were of, this standardized NaOH. Using a pipette, 5.00 mL
time, CH3COOH-CHCl3 (A-C) were prepared of aliquot of each phase were placed in a
by following the proportions indicated on Table 250—mL E-flask. Two-three drops of
2.2. phenolphthalein indicator were added to the
analyte and the sample was titrated (2 trials)
Table 2.2. Preparation of CH3COOH-CHCl3 (A-C) with the standardized NaOH to the
mixture. phenolphthalein end point.
sol’n no. %A (v/v) vol. A, mL vol. C, mL
1 20 2.5 10 III. Results and Discussion
2 30 3.75 8.75
3 40 5 7.5 There are several types of ternary systems
4 60 7.5 5 depending on the miscibility of the
5 70 8.75 3.75 components with each other. For system
A:B:C, wherein A is completely miscible with B
and C, and B:C are partially miscible with each
other, it results to the following general ternary
phase diagram:

Figure 2.2. A ternary phase diagram for system A:B:C.

In Figure 2.2, the vertices of the triangle show In essence, acetic acid and chloroform are
pure substances A, B and C. The curve line completely miscible as well as acetic acid and
within the triangle is called the binodal curve. water. Since acetic acid can interact with both
As previously discussed, this binodal curve water and chloroform, it should be placed at
encloses the region of immiscibility. This the center of the diagram.
indicates the limit or extent when it comes to
percent composition of each component to The interaction between acetic acid and water
form a solution. When B and C are mixed with is governed by hydrogen bonding, making
amounts included in this region, the resulting them miscible with each other. However,
mixture has two phases and B and C are now chloroform and water are only slightly soluble
immiscible (Castellan, 1983). in one another.

Another part of the Gibbs-Roozeboom For chloroform and acetic acid, there exists a
diagram is the tie line. Significantly, tie line significant dipole-dipole interaction which
refers to the isothermal line connecting the causes them to be completely miscible. This
composition of the two phases in a two phase can be supported by the close values of their
field. It is used to determine the composition of dielectric polarization which are 4.8 and 6.2,
the phases in the two-phase field. Delta point, respectively. The dielectric polarization is a
on the other hand, is where all the tie lines measure of polarity. Compounds with low
meet or the intersection of the tie lines. This dielectric polarization values are relatively
delta point is important in order to locate the nonpolar, while those with higher values are
plait point. The plait point is the isothermal polar, and the latter includes water whose
critical point in a ternary phase diagram. At the dielectric polarization constant is 80.4. Due to
plait point, it is easy to locate which region is the large difference in the dielectric constants
A-rich and which is B-rich. Also, at the plait of water and chloroform, which renders
point, the composition of A,B and C at phase chloroform as weakly polar while water as
1 is identical to the composition of A,B and C strongly polar, plus the absence of H-bonding,
at phase 2 (Levine, 2002). water’s dipole-dipole interaction with
chloroform is weak resulting to partial
In the experiment, acetic acid (A), water (B), miscibility (Solomons, 2011).
and chloroform (C) were used as the ternary
system. This exercise aimed to explain the In the construction of the Gibbs-Roozeboom
behavior of the system in terms of the various diagram, turbidimetric titration was first
molecular interactions present. performed to obtain the necessary data for the
construction of the binodal curve. The volume
where the first sign of turbidity appeared was
recorded for both water-acetic acid and acetic partially miscible with each other (Rogers,
acid- chloroform mixtures with chloroform and 2011).
water as titrants, respectively.
The same phenomena happened when acetic
Initially, acetic acid - water was titrated with acid - chloroform mixture was titrated with
chloroform. The two components are miscible water. As water was added to the system, the
and addition of chloroform forms miscibility of acetic acid with chloroform
homogeneous solution still. However, decreased due to the hydrogen bonding
saturation was reached when chloroform was between the acetic acid and water molecules.
further added, resulting to turbidity. As the Eventually, when enough amount of water has
amount of chloroform was increased, the been added, the mixture separated into two
miscibility of acetic acid with water decreased layers.
due to the dipole-dipole interaction between
acetic acid and chloroform molecules. The amounts of titrants used were recorded
Eventually, when enough chloroform had been and were used to compute the %w/w of the
added, the mixture separated into two layers – three components at the end point or at which
the water-rich phase and the chloroform-rich the second phase of the mixture/turbidity was
phase – since water and chloroform are only observed. Table 2.4 and 2.5 shows the
experimental and derived data.

Table 2.4. Data on the titration of mixture A-B with C.


Trial Prescribed Volume Mass %Weight
% v/v
A B C A B C A B C
1 20 5 20 0.2 5.25 19.9408 0.2948 20.59987 78.2434 1.156732
30 7.5 17.5 0.7 7.875 17.4482 1.0318 29.88048 66.20452 3.915007
40 10 15 2.2 10.5 14.9556 3.2428 36.58741 52.11301 11.29958
60 15 10 3.9 15.75 9.9704 5.7486 50.04925 31.68324 18.2675
70 17.5 7.5 9.7 18.375 7.4778 15.477 44.45945 18.093 37.44756
2 20 5 20 0.8 5.25 19.9408 1.1792 19.90899 75.61926 4.471748
30 7.5 17.5 1 7.875 17.4482 1.474 29.3874 65.11203 5.500575
40 10 15 2.2 10.5 14.9556 3.2428 36.58741 52.11301 11.29958
60 15 10 3 15.75 9.9704 4.422 52.25198 33.07766 14.67036
70 17.5 7.5 10 18.375 7.4778 14.74 45.26665 18.42149 36.31186

Table 2.5. Data on the titration of mixture A-C with B.


Trial Prescribed Volume Mass %Weight
% v/v
A B C A B C A B C
1 20 5 3 20 5.25 2.99112 29.48 13.91793 7.929563 78.1525
30 7.5 1 17.5 7.875 0.99704 25.795 22.7161 2.876046 74.40785
40 10 2.1 15 10.5 2.093784 22.11 30.25607 6.033302 63.71063
60 15 6.4 10 15.75 6.381056 14.74 42.71643 17.30641 39.97716
70 17.5 8.6 7.5 18.375 8.574544 11.055 48.34948 22.56189 29.08863
2 20 5 0.4 20 5.25 0.398816 29.48 14.945 1.135296 83.91971
30 7.5 1 17.5 7.875 0.99704 25.795 22.7161 2.876046 74.40785
40 10 2 15 10.5 1.99408 22.11 30.34324 5.762557 63.8942
60 15 5.4 10 15.75 5.384016 14.74 43.90364 15.00812 41.08824
70 17.5 8 7.5 18.375 7.97632 11.055 49.12272 21.32346 29.55383

The mass for each component at varying sodium hydroxide, NaOH solution. The
concentrations of % v/v CH3COOH were standard used was KHP.
computed given the density and the volume
used of the titrant for each component. Adding
From the prepared mixtures containing
the mass of CH3COOH, H2O, and CHCl3 gives
CH3COOHH2OCHCl3, its compositions are
the total mass. The mass of each component
found within the two-phase region of the
divided by the total mass gave the % w/w of
diagram. The conjugate phases were
CH3COOH. The % w/w of CH3COOH for each
separated and their density was computed
component both in H2OCH3COOH titrated
using the pycnometer. From the density of
with CHCl3 and CH3COOHCHCl3 titrated with each conjugate phase and given the volume of
H2O were recorded and used to form a binodal aliquot, the mass of the aliquot were
curve. See Figure 2.3. computed. From this the mass of CH3COOH is
computed given the molarity and volume used
After the binodal curve was constructed, the of NaOH for standardization multiplied by the
tie lines were then plotted. The values to be molar mass of CH3COOH. Finally the % w/w
plotted were obtained by preparing the ternary of CH3COOH is computed from mass of
mixtures whose compositions were located CH3COOH divided by mass of aliquot
within the two-phased region of the diagram. multiplied this quantity by 100. Table 2.6, 2.7
The phases were separated and from each and 2.8 summarizes the experimental and
phase (upper and lower), aliquots were derived data.
obtained and titrated using the standardized

Table 2.6. Data for the density of conjugate phases at room temperature.
mass pyc. mass pyc. w/ mass pyc. mass pyc. density lower, density upper,
Mixture
empty,g water,g w/ lower,g w/upper, g g/mL g/mL
1 16.028 26.2843 30.8904 26.5743 1.444810243 1.025231609
2 16.028 26.2843 30.6631 26.6788 1.422713854 1.03539031
3 17.6083 27.7399 31.9028 28.2209 1.40670657 1.044374699
4 17.6083 27.7399 31.626 28.2974 1.379466975 1.051902983

Table 2.7. Standardization of NaOH.


Parameter Trial 1 Trial 2
mass KHP, g 0.254 0.247
volume used, ml 1.4 1.1
molarity of NaOH, M 0.923374 1.0995272
average molarity, M 1.066766587

Table 2.8. Data on the titration of conjugate phases.


vol. NaOH used,
mass A, g Average
Phase mass aliquot, g mL
%w/w, A
trial 1 trial 2 trial 1 trial 2
U1 5.126158 16.5 20.8 1.057014 1.332479 23.30686
L1 7.224051 4.2 4 0.269058 0.256246 3.635799
U2 5.176952 25.4 24 1.627161 1.537475 30.56467
L2 7.113569 7.5 7.4 0.480461 0.474055 6.70912
U3 5.221873 32.4 32 2.075592 2.049967 39.50267
L3 7.033533 18 11.2 1.153106 0.717488 13.29769
U4 5.259515 39.6 37.4 2.536834 2.395899 46.89342
L4 6.897335 18.2 17 1.165919 1.089045 16.34663

The computed % w/w of CH3COOH for each system which has shaped memory properties.
conjugate phases, upper layer (B-rich) and Of these, ‘Spangold’, which has the nominal
lower layer (C-rich), were the two points stoichiometry Au7Cu5Al4, has received some
connected with a straight line (tie lines). When attention for jewelry applications, while the
the compositions of B-rich and C-rich phases edge compound Cu3Al is a well-known shape
become nearly the same, the tie lines get memory composition with corresponding
shorter. Extending the tie lines, the delta point specialized industrial uses (Bhadia et al.,
is obtained and a line tangent to the binodal 2007). Another application is the production of
curve was drawn to locate the plait point amorphous alloys in ternary systems Zr-(Pd,
wherein the two phases finally become Ru, Mo)-(Si, Bi). The synthesis of zirconium
identical. alloys can make use of the ternary system
since the alloys are expected to lie near the
It can be seen from the ternary diagram that eutectic ranges.
the addition of acetic acid to the water and
chloroform mixture increases the miscibility of Lastly, stainless steel (Fe-Ni-Cr) is another
the two liquids. Addition of acetic acid results common example of a metal alloy that is
to further mixing of water and chloroform until represented by a ternary phase diagram. It
it reaches a point with composition outside the has iron, nickel, and chromium compositions.
binodal curve where only one phase exist To view all three compositions at the same
(Rogers, 2011). time, a triangular plot is set up with an element
at each of the vertexes with the temperature
In Figure 2.3, the Gibbs-Roozeboom and pressure stated. See figure below for
method’s plait point is at, 37% acetic acid, better illustration (Yeakle, 1996).
5% water and 58% chloroform.

The properties of many systems are


conveniently described with the help of
triangular graphs. The increase in mutual
solubility of two liquids, owing to the addition
of a third, is a practical as well as theoretical
importance. This is important in deciding in
which solvent to use in dissolving a specific
solute. It will be a great help in choosing the
right solvent to use in the extraction method.
Likewise, ternary system is very useful in the
field of Petrology and Geology as in the study
of basalts, studies concerning minerals and
metals. Also, symbolic ternary system models
are used in the formal verifications of digital
circuits.
Figure 2.4. Stainless steel phase diagram.
Specifically, one of the important applications
of ternary system is the Al-Au-Cu ternary
Errors may be accounted to the limitations of contacted with an immiscible or nearly
the instruments used, like the defective buret. immiscible liquid (solvent) that exhibits
Also, it may also be due to the experimenters, preferential affinity or selectivity towards one
such as overruns. Another factor that may or more of the components in the feed. This
alter the gathered data is contamination of the type of method is more efficient than the
sample. turbidimetric method because it does not rely
upon human judgement to determine
On the other hand, Salih (2017) uses a liquid- immisicibility (Salih, 2017).
liquid extraction to contruct a ternary phase
diagram. It utilizes a liquid-liquid extractor
design in which a liquid solution (the feed) is

IV. Conclusion
Mixtures of the acetic acid-water- CHCl3
system whose composition lies under the
The Gibbs- Roozeboom diagram of the acetic
binodal curve were prepared to be able to
acid-water- CHCl3 system was constructed in
obtain the conjugate phases. From this data,
this experiment. Since the predicted degrees
the tie lines were constructed. The delta and
of freedom of the Gibbs phase rule cannot be
plait points were also located. Extending the
represented graphically, the temperature and
tie lines does this and the point of intersection
pressure were held constant. To be able to
is the delta point. The plait point is the point
graphically represent the ternary system, the
where the line extended from the delta point
Gibbs- Roozeboom diagram was used. This
and the curve meets. Consequently, the plait
makes use of an equilateral triangle.
point is at, 37% acetic acid, 05% water and
58% chloroform.

V. References
ROGERS, D.W. 2011. Concise Physical
BHADIA, V.K., LEVEY, F.C., KEALLEY, C.S., Chemistry. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons,
DOWD, A., and CORTIE, M.B. 2007. The Inc.
aluminum-copper-gold ternary system.
Australia: Institute for Nanoscale Technology. SALIH, M. 2017. Liquid-liquid equilibrium
for the design of extraction column.
CASTELLAN, G.W. 1983. Physical European Journal of Engineering and
Chemistry. 3rd ed. Massachusetts: Addison- Technology. Vol. 5 No. 4
Wesley Publishing Company.
SOLOMONS, T.W.G. 2011. Organic
DAVIDSON, A.W., H.K. VAN KLOOSTER, Chemistry. 10th ed. USA: John Wiley and
and W.H. BAUI. 1941. Laboratory Manual of Sons, Inc.
Physical Chemistry USA: Parallex Binding,
Sieves Mechanical Binding Co.
YEAKLE, J. Ternary Phase Diagrams.
LEVINE, I. N. 2002. Physical Chemistry, 6 th Retrieved from:
Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. <http://www.sv.vt.edu/classes/MSE2094_Not
eBook/96ClassProj/experimental/ternary2.ht
ml> on December 2, 2013.
VI. Calculations

Construction of binodal curve massA = (MV)NaOH ∙ MMA

massphase = ρphase (Vphase ) massA


g
g = (1.0114506 M)(0.01619 mL) (60.052 )
massA = 1.05 (5 mL) = 5.25 g mol
mL = 0.9833746 g

massB = 19.94 g

massC 0.737 g %A in aliquot

massA
total weight = ∑ massphase mass fractionA = × 100
massaliquot
total weight = 5.25 g A + 19.94 g B + 0.737 g C 0.9833746 g
= 25.9278 g mass fractionA = × 100 = 19.1929%
5.1236 g
massphase
% w⁄w phase = × 100
total weight

5.25 g A
% w ⁄w A = × 100 = 20.25%
25.9278 g

Density of conjugate phases

massphase+pyc − masspyc
ρphase = ρ
massH2O+pyc − masspyc H2O

31.702 g − 16.722 g g
ρlower layer = × 0.99704
27.085 g − 16.722 g mL
= 1.44 g/mL

Standardization of NaOH

(mass⁄MM)KHP
MNaOH =
VNaOH

0.254g
( ⁄204.22 g/mol)
MNaOH =
0.0014 L
= 1.066766587 M

Mass of aliquot

massaliquot = ρphase (Valiquot )

g
massaliquot = 1.0247 (5.00 mL) = 5.1236 g
mL

Mass of A in aliquot

You might also like