Sample Performa for Supervisor Evaluation [Part B]

FINAL YEAR PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA

Design Project II (ME4924)
Students’ Names

Registration No.s

Project Title

Supervisor Co-supervisor

SUPERVISOR EVALUATION
The evaluation score is based on an alphabetical grading system. You can grade the students
using one of the following.
A, B+, B, B-, C+, C, C-, D, F.
‘A’ refers to the highest possible score which means maximum evaluator satisfaction against
the given criterion and ‘F’ representing minimum satisfaction.

CLO/
Evaluation (B) Level S1 S2 S3
PLO

1. Design procedure, methods, standards and techniques are appropriate for

CLO1/
BE level and as per the requirements of the project. The design does not C6
PLO3
violate any laws of physics and is theoretically justifiable.

2. The design calculations are mathematically correct and the results are CLO1/
C6
valid. PLO3

3. Tools / techniques (experimental/ simulation) used for investigation and/ CLO2/

C6
or validation are appropriate for the project. PLO4

4. Design calculations are through some appropriate means (e.g. CLO2/

C6
experimental/ simulation, through comparison with literature etc.) PLO4

5. All elements of effective report writing such as corrections of language

(grammar), format (in particular that of graphs and figures) are correct and CLO3/
A5
appropriate to convey the proposed design in logical and convincing PLO10

manner.

6. All elements of effective presentation skills such as use of technical

CLO3/
language/ appropriate body language, props or demos (if applicable), PLO10
A5
effective time management during presentation etc.
 CLO/
Evaluation (B) Level S1 S2 S3
PLO

7. The project milestones defined at start were adhered to in reasonable CLO4/

A5
manner and the students reported progress during scheduled meetings PLO11

8. The resource constraints (physical, hardware, software and fiscal) were CLO4/
A5
identified in a timely manner and required resources were procured. PLO11

CLO4/
9. Students were able to complete all/ most project deliverables PLO11
A5

10. Students went beyond the material covered in regular courses to learn
CLO5/
appropriate tools/ techniques (experimental/ simulation) required for the PLO12
A5
project.

11. Students gathered appropriate product/ process design parameters and CLO5/
A5
constraints through literature survey or market research as appropriate. PLO12

Comments, if any

Supervisor’s
Signature

Date

Grade Marks
A 89
B+ 85
B 80
B- 76
C+ 71
C 67
C- 62
D 53
F 49