2oT>

~ecd. m R &
ol, !<J
o Dt.-··-~/..~_
.....
--·_ ~.._ __
-
5..9

Sent '" oG Sect\ Dt~~;;::J

···n·ar.···~·..~-,~·:· GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
B-'' t> tt t:z D Sec~:-. ·· i«<NJSTRY OF RAILWAYS
«-• t to C<>o Qm.el ••·•· (RAILWAY BOARD)

f ,r•
No. 2014/Proj./DBR/BNC/2/10 7/~1/).-- New Delhi, date 28.08.2015
/2 .:1o P r>---

The Managing Director,

MEGA Company Umited,
S'h floor, Nirman Bhawan,
Opp. Sachivalaya Gate No.4,
::.ector-lO-A,
Gandhinagar-382010,
Gujarat

Sub: Approval of Design Basis Report (Version-S), Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project
Phase-1.
Ref: MEGA's letter No. M EGA/MD/Design/DBR/Structure/June-15 dated 22.07.2015

The Design Basis Report (DBR) for viaduct, Version -5 of Metro Link Express for
Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad (MEGA) Co. Ltd. has been examined in consultation with
RDSO and approval of Railway Board is hereby conveyed.

Accordingly, approved copy of DBR (Version-S) is enclosed.

DA/As above.
' \S

(Rut C g an)
Director/Works( Pig.)
' . Railway Board
~ -~ l:~"' ~ '"' Ph. 011-23097061
~- i>·J;;It.

\9'PY to: Executive Director/UTHS, RDSO, Manak Nagar, lucknow.

C'->
r -
-. tr ·.\ €. ' ' : .,.; \ \"'
1 r~ o J+-';-. '
\,~\~ ...~
./ \

'( •, '. \' \: t\.-i ' \..-.

-,J
..':> ,·...'
 METRO - LINK EXPRESS FOR
GANDHINAGAR AND
AHMEDABAD
STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASIS REPORT FOR VIADUCT

Version- 5

Metro-link Express for Gandhinagar& Ahmedabad (MEGA) Company ltd.

(A Govt. of Gu]arClt Undcrta l<•n?)
5'" Floor, Nirman Bhavan, Opp . Sach 1vataya Gate No. 4

f f-"'
Sector - 10 A, Gand h•na..,ar 3820' 0 •
GuJ rat, ;i\d , ,{ENFR.~L r.' t.N AG i:: R
c;LANNING & OESIN!:f)
MEGA CO. I.TI~·
r
METRO·UNK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................- ..........................................1

1.1 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................... 1
1.2 AIM OF DESIGN BASIS REPORT ..................................................................................... 1
.
2.0 UNITS ........................................................................................................................................1
3 .0 TRACK GEOMETRY, TRACK STRUCTURE AND ROLLING STOCK.........................1
4.0 ROADWAY AND RAILWAY CLEARANCES......................................................................1
4 .1 CLEARANCES FOR ROAD TRAFFIC............................. ................................................. !
4.2 CLEARANCES FOR EXISTING RAILWAY CROSSINGS .............................................1
4.3 CLEARANCES FOR ROLLINGSTOCK OF AHMEDABAD METRO .............................2
5.0 DESIGN LIFE & SERVICEABIU1Y .................................................................................. 2
6.0 MATERIALS PARAMETERS ................................................................................................. 2
6.1 CONCRETE...... ......................... ........................ .................................................................2
6 .2 PRESTRESSING STEEL FOR T ENDONS .........................................................................3
6 .2.1 Young's Modulus ...........................................................................................................3
6.2.2 Prestressing Units .........................................................................................................3
6.3 REINFORCEMENT STEEL (REBARS) ............................................................................4
6.4 STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR STEEL &COMPOSITE BRIDGES ....................................4
6. 5 STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR MISCLLANEOUS USE.............................................•........4
7.0 LOADS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR DESIGN ..............................................................4
7 .1 DEAD LOAD .............................................................................................................................4 ,..-:_- -,
7 . 1. 1 Self weight of structure (DL)....................................................................................4 ' --.. ,r~ ~ '·
, ..... \' ( • «J · . '

. \
7 .1. 2 Sup er Imposed Dead Load (SIDL) .......................................................................$ . . ,~
. ~\\
£X...-~ ,. '
:
7. 2 PRE-STRESS FORCE (PR) .................. .......... ............................................................$
7.3 LIVE LOAD (LL) ..................................................................................................................5
7.3 . 1 Railway Vehicula r Load................................................................... ......................5
7 .3.2 Dynamic Augmentation ..............................................................................................7
7 .3 .3 Braking and Traction (BR I TR) ......................................................................7
7.3.4 Centrifugal Forces Due to Curvature of Superstructure ................................ s
7 .3.5 Racking Force ............................... . . ...... . . ........ . ..................................8
7.4 TEMPERATURE EFFECTS (TL) ....................................................................................8
7.4 .1 Gen eral : ............................................ .............. .......................... .................... 8

llESIG:\ BASIS RF.POR 1-VI.-\OUCT· \'5 II

 METRO-LINK EXPRESS fOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

7.4.2 Resistance to movement of elastomeric bearings (BS)........................ ......8

7.4.3 Rail Stru cture I-..teraction {LWR Forces) ..............................................................s
7 .5 EMERGENCY WALKWAY (LFP) .......................................................................................... 9
7 .6 WI ND LOAD {WL) ...............................................................................................................9
7.7 SEISMIC FORCE (EQ) .........................................................................................._ .......9
7.8 ERECTION TEMPORARY LOADS (ET L) ...........................................................................9
7.9 DERAILMENT LOADS {DR)..................................................................................... ......9
7.10 FORCES ON PARAPET............................................................................................... to
7.11 DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT (DS) .................•.................................................... 10
7. 12 BUOYANCY LOADS .................................................................................................... 10
7.13 VEHICLE COLLISION LOAD {VCL) ....................................................................... lO
7.14 GRADIENT EFFECT .................................................................................................... 10
7. 15 BUFFER LOAD ...................................................•.............•........................................... 11
7. 16 VIBRATION EFFECT .................. ................ .............................................................. It
7.1 7 SHRINKAGE AND CREEP ......................................................................................... l l
7.18 FOOTPATH LIVE LOAD ............................................................................................. ll
8.0 LOAD COMBINATIONS ........................................................................................... ...... 11
8.1 ELEMENTARY LOADS DEANffiON .............................................................................. 11
8.2 LOAD COMBINATIONS METHODOLOGY ......................•...........................................•. U
9.0 DESIGN CHECK FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURE .........:.............................................. 13 '·

9.1 ~~~~~-~-~-~=-~~~-==~S F~~-~-~-~-=~~-~--~~--~~-~~-~~-~~~~~--~-~~~~~~~-~13 %~\"1' ..

9.2 ULS CHECK FOR PRESTRESSED CAST-11\t SITU CONCRETE/COMPOSITE
CONSTRUCTION................................................................................... ............................ ..... 13
9.3 ULS CHECK FOR RCC STRUCTURE ........................... ............................................... 13
10.0 DURABILITY & CRACK WIDTH ........................................................................... l3
10.1 DURABILITY ................................................................................................................ 13
10.2 CONCRETE COVER. ........ ............................................................................... . . 14
10.3 CRACK WIDTH CHECK..... .......... ................. ........... .. ... ............ ................. ... 14
:1.0 f'ATIGUE ............... . 14

11 . 1 GENERAL ............... ..................................................................................................... 14

11.2 PRESTRESSED CONCRtE STRUC"URES .. 1~

l J .3 REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES ..... ......... . .. 14

11.4 STEEL STRUCTURES ...

111
tl
II
ME"TRQ-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

12.0 FOUNDATIONS ............................................................................................................ 14

13.0 PILE CAP ................... ................................................................................................ 15
14.0 PIER CAP & PIER ........................................................................................................ lS
15.0 PIER CAP.................. ............................... ............. ............................................ 15
16.0 BEARING SYSTEM AND ITS DESIGN METHODOLOGY................................. 15
16.1 BEARING SYSTEM .............. .............. .......... .............. ........................... 15
16.2 REPLACEABILITY OF BEARINGS........................................................................... 16
16.3 UPUFT...... ................... .............................. ............................................................. 16
17.0 SUPERSTRUCTURE SYSTEM OF VIADUCT ........................................................ 16
18.0 DRAINAGE ...................................................... ............................................................. 17
19.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS, APPLICABILITY .............. 11
19.1 IRS CODES (WITH LATEST VERSIONS) ...................................................... .. 17
19.2 IRC CODES (WITH LATEST VERSIONS) ............................................................ 18
19.3 IS CODES (WITH LATEST VERSIONS) ............................................................... 18
19.4 BS Codes (WITH LAT EST VERSIONS} ................................................................ 20
19.5 OTHERS (WITH LATEST VERSIONS) .................................................................. 20

{) L i '• t

~\YI'" ':-/

. I

t /---'
~t:"'f'FII.l t/C,~GI: ~
OFSIGN R\SIS R' 'l'O'lT Vl Ull('r. \'~ Ill luly 21) 1r,
vLANNII>tG !1. O£Sif'iy.l)
MEGA CO. LTD.
 METRO·UNK EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Des1gn Basis Report perta ins to Viaduct Portion of Ahmedabad Metro Project from
Matera stadium to APMC and Vastral Gam to Thaltej prov1ding North - South and East·
West connectivity respeCtively.

1.1 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT

The Viaduct for Ahmedabad Metro project compnses of Precast PSC segmental smgle box
girder or cast· 1n-situ box girder w1th inclined webs support1ng two tracks with RCC
substructure and Bored cast in sit" pile foundat1on. The standard gauge of 1435mm shall
be followed. The centre to centre distance between the two tracks shall be as per SOD of
MEGA.

1.2 AIM OF DESIGN BASIS REPORT

This Design Bas's Report provides Design Criteria for Viaduct of Ahmedabad Metro

2.0 UNITS

The m ain units used for d esign shall be: [m]. [mm], [t], [kN), [KN/m 2 ] , [MPa] , [ 0 C) ,
[rad]

3.0 TRACK GEOMETRY, TRACK STRUCTURE AND ROLLING STOCK

Track Geometry, Track Structure & Rolling Stock should be as per the approved SOD of
MEGA.

4.0 ROADWAY AND RAILWAY CLEARANCES

The v1aduct runs along and crosses several ex 1sting roadways and existing railways. The
followmg sections outline the general clearance requ~rements for these cross1ngs.

4.1 CLEARANCES FOR ROAD TRAFFIC

Clearance for road traffic shall be as per Road Authonty of IRC reqUi rement.

4.2 CLEARANCES FOR EXISTING RAILWAY CROSSINGS

Clearance for Railway Traffic shou ld be as per Schedu le or D1mens1ons of Jnd1an

Railways. General Ar rangement Drawrng o' ra•lway crossmg shall be approved by the
releva nc Rai'way Authon ty.

llESJr.-; B,\SIS Rf.PORT-\"1,\nlJCT -'.·5 I1 July, 20 lS

 METI!()-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHJNAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

4.3 CLEARANCES FOR R.:>LUNGSTOCK OF AHMEDABAD METRO

Clearances for Rolling Stock should be as per the approved Schedule of Ormensrons of
MEGA.

5.0 DESIGN LIFE & SERVICEABILITY

The lrfe of marn Structural systems should be as per cla use 15.1.3 of IRS: CBC. The
design life of PSC structure shall be as per clause 16.1.3 of IRS: CBC.

6.0 MATERIALS PARAMETERS

6.1 CONCRETE

I. Young's Modulus & Modular ratio

A. Young's Modulus

Clause no. 5.2.2. 1 of IRS: CBC should be followed.

B. Modular Rat io

Modular Ratio including long term effects such as creep shall be taken as
follows(§ 5.2.6 o~ IRS: CBC).

I
For tensile reinforcement, m, = 280/ f""
'
For compressive rernforcement, m< = 420/ f"'
I
II. Minimum Grade of Concrete & Cover

Mrnimum grade of concrete should be as per clause no 5.4.4 of IRS CBC for
exposure condrtion defined rn Clause 5.4 1 of IRS: esc.

The cover shourd be as per clause 15.9.2 of IRS: CBC

III. Cement
The type of cement shall be as per clause 4.1 o' IRS: CBC.
•
The m rnrmum cementrtious material content shall be ~s per clause 5.4.5 &
table 4·(c) of I RS : CBC

:< '; (
...... 'lf-4G.t,. '··''~~"'*""''
!:JESIG'I/ fl:\SIS REPORT-VlADUcr- ,_.~ 12 ; I A~~I'Jft... G \. ~t.~IN · .. Jt..'Y. l
I~EG.A ~Q~ ~J
 METRO-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD
•
The maximum water-cement ratio shall be as per clause 5.4.3 & table 4(a) of
IRS: esc.

The total chlonde content by weight of cement shall be as per clause 5.4.6 of
IRS: CBC.

IV. Density
Densoty of concrete shall be as per Table 1 of IS· 875 (part-I).

V Poisson's Ratio
Poisson's ratio for all concrete : 0.15 .

VI. Thermal Expansion Coefficient --·

Coefficoent of thermal expansion (o) has been considered as per § 2.6. 2 of
IRS: Bridge Rules .

VTI. Time-Dependent Characteristics of Materials

I. Long term losses should be calculated on accordance with clause 16.8.2 of

IRS: CBC.
II. The des1gn shall be done according to construction sequence to be adopted
on site.
IlL Vahdatior. of software should be done by MEGA.

PRESTRESSING STEEL FOR TENDONS

Prestressing steel shall be conforming to IS: 14268, Low Relaxation stress

rel ieved strands as per clause 4.6 of IRS: CBC.

Young's Modulus

Young's Modulus of Prestressong steel shall be as per dause 4.6.2 of IRS: CBC.

Prestressing Units

Prestressong Unots: 7K13, 12Kl3, 19K13,7Kl5, 12Kl5, 19K15

For Anchorage: refer clause 7.2.6.4.3 and 16.8.3.4 of IRS: CBC.
Jackong Force shall be as per Clause 16.8. 1 of IRS: CBC.
Transmosso n te~g~h or Pre·tensooned sree sh~ be as per §16.8.4. 1 o f IRS : esc.

· .~ '\It- f'{ C.t r1r 1.:J ... 1•

~~~ ~EPOHT-\'1 \DIJ(f. \''; J3 l ,.'HJ"JIJ..i(.; 6 Slt.~·~\l1 July, 201 S
.Atb..O l-0. LTC',
 METRO-liNK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

Other Parameters

Sheathing: Corrugated HOPE Duct shall be used as per clause 7.2.6.4.2 of IRS:
CBC.

Wobble /Curvature shall be as per clause 16.8.3 of IRS: CBC.

Maximum Slip at anchorage = 6mm (to be dec1ded based on pre-stressing

anchorage system adopted).

6-3 REINFORCEMENT STEEL (REBARS}

Reinforcement as per dause 4.5 of IRS: CBC shall be adopted. I

I
6.4 STRUCTURAl STEEl FOR STEEl &COMPOSITE BRIDGES

Structural steel shall conform to IS: 2062.

Fabrica tion shall be done as per provisions of IRS Bl (Fabrication Code).
Design of Steel Structures shall be done as per IRS: Steel Bndge Codes.
IS codes sha ll be referred for steel RCC composite construction.
Welding shall be done followmg IRS: Steel Bridge Codes Provisions and
submerged Arc welding (SAW) shall be done. Field welding shall not be done.

6.5 STRUCTURAl STEEL FOR MISClLANEOUS USE

Design shall be done as per IS: 800 and related provisions.

Hollow steel sections for structural use shall be as per I S: 4923.
Steel tubes for structural purposes shall be as per IS: 1161.
Steel for general struc:ural purposes shall be as per IS: 2062.

7.0 LOADS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR DESIGN

Followings are the vanous loads to be taken into consideration for analys1s and
design of structures as prescnbed in IRS: Bridge Rules up to latest up-to-date
corr ection slip.

7.1 DEAD LOAD

7.1.1 Self weight of structure (Dl}

Dead loaa Includes weigh> or snuctural component of bridge superstructu re.

,.,.t rt
DF.SIG'< B.'\SIS RF.PORT-V!AOUCT· VS July. ll'!;
 METRO-liNK EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

7.1-2 Super I mposed Dead Load (SIDL)

The following items shall be considered as SIDL:

I. Rails+ pads
IL Cable trough cell
Ill. Cable trays
IV. Hand Rail ,
\
V. Third Rail
VI. MISCellaneous (OCS, signaling)
VII. Cables
VIII. Para pet
IX. Plinths
Note: The SIDL can be of two types: Fixed or non variable, and variable. In case
Melro certifies that a porti on of SIDL 1s of fixed or non variable type and it is not
likely to vary significantly during the life of the structure and a special clause for
ensuring the same IS incorporated in the Metro's mamtenance manual, the load
factors applicable for dead load may be considerea for this component of S!DL.

7.2 PRE-STRESS FORCE (PR)

The pre- stressing force calculation will be as per § 16.8 of IRS: CBC. The loss of
pre stress due to frict1on will be calculated as per § 16.8.3 of IRS: CBC. The loss
of pre-stress, other than friction losses will be calculated as per§ 16.8.2 of IRS:
CBC.

7.3 LIVE LOAD ( LL)

7.3.1 Railway Vehicular Load

Each component of the structure shall be designed I checked for all poss1ble
combmations of these loads and forces. They shal resist the effect of the worst
comb1nation of following coach dimension:

.. - - - - ----------------·
D
Max, mu m Axle load 16 t

l t.::SlC,'I: B \SIS RFPORT·\"APUIT \', 15

 METRO-liNK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

Maximum number of successtve cars = 6

Where,
D 22600 mm (Length of a car over coupler)

a = (ba lance)
b = 2200mm to 2400mm (Length of rigid wheel base for single bog1e)
b + c- 14800 +/- 250 mm (Distance between bog1e centres)

Based on these four comb1nat•ons are done

. .,.
'
\

Comb 1: b : 2200 mm and b + c = 14550 mm \

Comb 2: b = 2200 mm and b + c = 15050 mm
Comb 3: b = 2400 mm and b + c = 14550 mm
Comb 4: b = 2400 mm and b + c = 15050 mm

Mov.ng load analysis IS done for all four combinations of axle spacing as
ment•oned above and envelope of forces viz., Bending moment and shear forces
are found out. From thiS envelop, equivalent UOL for bendmg moment and shear
forces IS found out and tabulated below.

w here,
Loaded Length: For Bending Moment, l is equal to the effect1ve span in meters.
For Shear, l is the loaded length in meters to give the max1mum Shear 10 the
Member under consideration.
EUDL (BM): The equ1valent uniformly d1stnbuted toad for bend1ng moment for
spans above l Orn such that the bending moment due to EUDL at 1/6 of the span
is equal to bendmg moment developed at the same section due to load tram as
defined above
EUDL (SF): The equ1vatent un1formly distributed load for shear force for spans
such that the shear force due to EUDL at the support •s equal to shear force
developed at the same sect1on due co load tram defined above

EUDL for the Roll.ng Srock of "'EGA IS as under:

EUDL(T) lF (T)
l (M) sr SM TE BF

t
11.5 7f>.337 71.28 12.8 11.52
13 83.522 73.818 12.8 11.52
J
14 5 89 719 81978 12.8 11.52
~

OESIC'< B.~S!S RE I'ORT-\'1 \DUCT-\') 6

.r
II
METRO-liNK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

16 94.210 86.593 12.8 11.52

: 175 97.911 I 91.032 u.s I 11.52
19 100.821 94.522 12.8 11.52
I 20.5 103.372 97.4 12.8 11.52
' 22 105.340 99.893 • 12.8 11.52
23.5 106.289 101.944 16.0 14.4 I
25 109.442 103.711 19.2 17.28
26.5 112.839 105.312 19.2 17.28
28 117.749 105.545 19.2 17.28
29.5 121.820 108.740 19.2 17.28
31 125.693 111.065 22.4 20.16
32.5 129.789 115.234 22.4 20.16
34 134.526 118.994 25.6 23.04
--
35.5 140.109 122.581 25.6 23.04
37 145.275 127.051 25.6 23.04
38.5 150.024 131.713 25.6 23.04
40 154.360 136.938 I 25.6 23.04
--
Notes

1. Effect of Dy'lamic augmentation needs to be considered separately.

2. Longitudinal forces need to be worked out considering LWR-RSI analysis as
per dause 5.16 of model OBR.

Loads other than standard trains like track machmes, cranes, any new rolling
stock etc. which may come on this strvctu~ should be within the loading
envelope initially decided by the metro as above.
For spedal structures like continuous structure, cable stayed bridges, etc. the
actuaf train loads may be used for design.
--
7 .3.2 Dynamic Augmentation

CDA for 1ong•tud1nal and transverse ana·ysis shalf be as per IRS: Bridge Rules.

7 .3. 3 Br aking and T r action ( BR I TR)

The value of brak1ng and traction forces will be taken as per rolling stock used, to
be dectded by MEGA. For twin tracked deckS carry1ng traffic in oppos1te directions,
cons1derat•ons should be g1ven to brakmg forces •rorr one tram and traction
forces from another, act1ng simultaneously which w1ll be ma>C1mum long•tud1nal
oao.ng on deck. For more than t\YO tracks, Cause 2 8.4 of IRS: Bndge Rules shall
be cons1dered.
As per Clause 2.8.5 ol IRS: Bnde Rules, when cons1dering se•smic forces, 1n

. (
'lFSIG'i I! \S'S REPOHT Vl.\')1 'I r 1;.-; 17
I { •.•, t N
, ,,... ., .t.. r.""· (. ,,!uly.
• LANNii•;,.:; .>; ~I. $1NGt
20,1 S
..,. 1, ,t . ._

:\'!EGA CO. lTQ.

 METRO-liN K EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

transverse/longitudinal seismic condition, only 50% of gross tractive

effort/braking force will be considered .
Dispersion of longitudinal forces Is not allowed as per Clause 2.8.3.4 of I RS:
Bridge Ru les.

7.3 .4 Cent rifugal Forces Due to Curvat u r e of Superstructure

The horizon tal centrffugal force due to moving load in curved su perstructu re is to
be considered as per§ 2.5 of lRS: Bridge Rules.
C=Wv2 1127R

Where W is axle load in kN, v is maximum design speed in km/h and R is radius
of curvature in m . This force is assumed to act at a height o f 1.80 m above rail
t op level.

7.3 .5 Racking Force

The horizont al transverse loading due to racking specified in IRS: Bridge Rules §
2.9 is applicable to design of latera l bracing .

7.4 T EMPERATURE EFFECTS {Tl )

7 .4 . 1 General:

As per Clause 2.6 of I RS: Bridge Rules.

1 ). Over all Temperature (OT ): As per Clause 215.2 of IRC: 6.

2) . Differential Temperatu re {DT): As per IRC: 6.
3) . Tempera•we gradient: As per Clause 215 of IRC: 6.

7 .4.2 Resi stance to movement of elastomeric bearings {BS)

Elastomer ic bearing will resist movement/deformation of superstructure other

than applied load i.e. due to vanat1on of temperatur e/creep strain/shrinkage
st rain etc. The bearing r esistance sha ll be calculated as per Clause 211.5.1.3 of
I RC: 6 -2014 duly ensu ring provisions given in IRS: Bridge Rules.

7.4.3 Rai l Struct ure I nt era ction (LWR Forces)

A rail structure mteract10n [RSIJ analysis is required because the contin uously
welded runn1ng rails are cont•nuous over the deck expansion JOints. The
in teraction occurs because the rails are directly connected to rhe decks by
fasten•ng system.

DES IGN B.ASIS RIOPORT- VT,\Dl/CT V5

 METRQ-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD
1
1. Rail Structure interaction studies shall be done as per provisions of UIC
774-3 R with the followong parameters specifoed in consultation with track
design engmeers:
i) Track resistance in loaded and unloaded condotoons.
ii) Maxomum additional stresses In rail on tension as well as compression on
account of rail-Structure interaction.
iii) Maximum vertical deflection of the girder ends.

2. Software and general methodology to be used for carrying out Rail·

Structure onteraction analysis must be validated before adopting the same.
3. Representative s tretches must be chosen for carrying out Rail-Structure
interaction.
4. Checks must be performed for break in raol continuity due to unusual
conditions like fractures or for maintenance purposes.
5. RDSO Guodelines for carrying out RSI studies shall be referred.
6. LWR forces shall be considered n appropriate load combination as per
IRS: CBC. r:.-:- ./~
,..---·--,.,.
''. \
7.5 EMERGENCY WALKWAY ( LFP)
. I
\ -' I
The layout of walkway shall be as per i;!pproved SOD of MEGA.
'4\
.Jl -,-.1
I ' t
.~ ,'
7.6 WINO LOAD ( WL}

The wond load shall be calculated as per§ 2.11 of IRS: Bridge Rules and I S: 875
(Part 3).

7 .7 SEISMIC FORCE (EQ)

Seosmic analysos of viaducts will be conducted as per "R.OSO Guidelines on

Seismic Oes~gn of Railway Bridges-Jan 2015 (These guidelines also cover load
combinations and ductile detailing aspects).

7 .8 ERECTION TEMPORARY LOADS (ETL)

Erectoon forces and effects shall be consodered as per coause 2.13 of IRS: Bridge
Rules. The we1ght of all permanent and tempOr<Ory material together with all other
forces and effects which can operate on any par. of during erection shall be taken
onto account

7.9 DERAILMENT LOADS (DR)

-me c~ra lrnent oad shall be i!S per Append x XXV of IRS: Bridge Rules wotl'!

LJFSIG'Ii ll1SIS REPORT·\" \!WCT· \") 9 I July '!l.l ~

l:>t NfR C..L N'.r-~.:.Ct.'l.
PLANNING.._ DE SI N~
MEGA CO . .LTD.
II
I METRO-UNK EXPRESS FOR GANDHI NAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

standard gauge In place of broad gauge. For ULS and stabihty check, loi!ding sha ll
be proportioned as p.:Jr maximum axle load .
Sacramento derailment criteria may be used for U-g•rders. This cnterion
corresponds to the application of 40% of one coach weight applied horizontally as
a 3M long umform Impact load on the U Girder top flange. This derailMent load
corresponcs to an ULS load. For SLS combmatJOn-5 of IRS: CBC a 1 /1.75 co-
efficient shall be applied to the dera•lment load.

7.10 FORCES ON PARAPET

The parapets shall be designed to res•st lateral hor izontal force & a vertical force
of 1.50kN/m applied simultaneously at the top of the parapet as per § 2.10 of
IRS: Bridge Rules. Add•tional n01se barrier In addition to above aerodynam•c
actions from passmg of tram shall be taken into account based on the design
speed of the train, aerodynamic shape of the train, the shape of parapet structure
and the pos1tion of parapet structure.

7.11 DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT (OS)

Differential Settlement between two adjacent viaduct piers shall be as follows

• 12 mm tor Long Tenrn Settlement;
• 6 mm for Short Tenrn Settlement
The allowable settlement for pile group IS 25mm (as per 15:2911-Part 4), hence
differential settlement between two foundations is considered as half of 2Smm i.e.
12mm as long term settlement. The short term settlement or 6mm is considered
to cater for beanng replacement condition.

Differential settlement shall be considered only in the des1gn of contmuou!'- --:;-

structures, ,f any.
' -~

7.12 BUOYANCY LOADS

Clause 5.10 of IRS: substructure and foundation shall be cons1dered for

evaluatmg effect of buoyancy for submerged part of structure under water.

7 .13 VEHICLE COLUSION LOAD (VCL)

The vehicle coll•s•on load shall be cons•dered as per clause 222 of IRC. 6 2014.

7.14 GRADIENT EFFECT

The load due to long•tud•na' grad•ent effect shal be cons1dered as appl•cable .

DF~iG!'\ B.\SIS REPORT '.'1 Ill ! r- \"; I I0 L

l•
.
r I
~~N· w .• flt1h;AU5R
" L ANNI"'G " OESIHG··
MEGA CO. LTO.
 METRO-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

7.15 BUFFER LOAD

The buffer load shal l be considered as applicable.

7.16 VIBRATION EFFECT

The vibration effect shall also be considered as applicable.

7.1 7 SHRINKAGE AND CREEP

Shrinkage and creep effects w;ll be calculated as per IRS: CBC.

7.18 FOOTPATH LIVE LOAD

As per clause 2.3.2 of IRS Bndge Rule.

8.0 LOAD COMBINATIONS

8.1 ELEMENTARY LOADS DEFINITION

Elementary loads taken mto account are:

Elementary load
Dead Load OL
Super l1'11posed Loads SIOL
Shrinkage&. Creep sc
Presues:, PS
I i'e load u I rain Weight
-
TW
D) namic Impact I
I orce due to cun'3turc or T r~n!'over.se eccentricit}' CF
l.ongiwdinal lo= 1 tracth¢. Braking) I.F
Live Load on Fool Path* LFP
\\'hen Lhe load on loot path" con;idcred then 'o CD\
~hall be dpplicd on I rain Live load 10 accounl for
O.,.(ation:u~ il'3in u11dcr emCJ1',!ency condition.

O'eral l temperature effe1.:t OT

Differential Temperature DT
Long. '' elded rail tor.:es LR
Racking fore~ Rl·

1-. )f".::~ on pata~h pp

\\ inJ prc,,ure c:th.•l..'t. 1\l l ~m~iludi11al Direcli(\0 \I I.'

I 11"-"er-.c: )i~IJ 1\lz

Ill

f
 METRO-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

F.atthqua~e IEQ t.on!litudin:tl direction EQ '\

Trans'e~e directjon EQz

Buoynncy
i Venical direction EQ I
!l
Differential :....:ttlcrnent f)S
Oertlilment Load DR
l rictionnl Re:str3int FR

The analysis and design will be carried out for all possoble cases of rolhng traon
loads. All the supportong structures, such as superstructure, beanngs,
substructure and foundations shall be checked for the most onerous cases.

1.1.1 : Used fo r Deck Torsion. U<1>ring (\>mpression, Uplift c hock, Shall check,
l'oundmion cbccl.

0 0
1.1.2: Lsed for Shaft check. Found.l.toon check

LW: Used for Deck check. Bearing Compression check, Shaft ch.,cl.. fo11ndation check

LL-1: L'sed for •haft c~eck foundotion check. Shear K") ched,

8.2 LOAD COMBINATIONS METHODOLOGY

The ULS and SLS load col"lbonat•ons and partoal safety factors for loads should be
fol lowed as per clause ~ 1.2, clause 11.3 and Table 1.2 of IRS: CBC.

In l1eu of combinations 2 of clatJSC 11.0 and Table !.2 of IRS:CBC, All strucwral

fJFSI(,\ ll \SI~ REPI1RT·VI.\DIJCT· \'" ( 12

1
r
'
 METRO-UNK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

elements shall be checked for Ult1mate lim1t state and Serviceability limit state
load Combinations as defined in clause 6.7 of "RDSO Guidelines on Seismic
Des1gn of Railway Bridges-Jan 201 5".
The superstructure/bearing, sub-structure and foundatiOn will be checked for one
rrack loaded condition as well as both track loaded condition , for sing le spa n and
both spans loaaed conditions, as the case may be.
Design of viaduct shall be in accordance w1th the construction
methodology/construction sequence to be adopted during execut ion.

9.0 DESIGN CHECK FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURE

9.1 ALLOWABLE STRESSES FOR CONCRETE AT SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE

The stresses at transfer, construction stage and dur;ng service for pres'"uessed
casr in situ and SC9mental construction shall be as per clause 16.4.2.2 (Concrete
Com pressive stress Limitations), 16.4.2.3 (Steel stress Lim itations),
16.4.2.4(Cracking), l7.3.3(0ther types of Connect1ons) and 17.4 (Composite
Concrete Constructions) of IRS: CBC. However for precast segmental
construction, no tensile stress shall be permitted at transfer and dunng
construction .

Clause 10. 2(Serv1ceability Lim1t States) of IRS: esc shall be used for RCC
construction (Beams, columns and slabs).

9.2 ULS CHECK FOR PRESTRESSED CAST-IN SITU CONCRETE/COMPOSITE

CONSTRUCTION

Clause 16.4.3 (Ultimate Limit State: Flexure) to clause 16.4.6 (Longitudina l

shear) of IRS: CBC shall be applicable for cast- in s1tu Prestressed constructiOn
whereas for composite construction dause 17.4 (Composite Concrete
Constructions) shall be used.

9.3 ULS CHECK FOR RCC STRUCTURE

As per IRS: esc.

10.0 DURABIUTY & CRACK WIDTH

10.1 DURABILITY

Prov1S1on of clause 5.4 of IRS: CBC shall be fol low<;>d

. f
"P '
GENfRC.l lit t,NAGl R
m SIC<"' BASIS Rl PORT·VIo\IWCT· V5 I IJ PLANNING 8. OfiGl~i
MEGA CO. LTD.
l 10.2 CONCRETE COVER
METR.O·LINK EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

The cover should be as per cia use 15.9. 2 of IRS: CBC.

10.3 CRACK WIDTH CHECK

For SLS Combination GJ, crack w1dth in reinforced concrete members shall be
calculated as per clause 15.9.8.2.1 of IRS: CBC.

The allowable crack w1dth should be as per clause 10.2.1(a) based on the
exposure condition defined in clause 5.4.1 of IRS: CBC and table-10 of IRS: esc.

For crack control in columns, Clause 15.6.7 of IRS: CBC will be mod1fied to the
extent that actual ax1al load will be considered to act simultaneously. Clause no.
10.4.1, 11.3.4, and 13.3 of IRS: esc shall be kept in view while calculating
vertical deflection at m1d span.

11.0 FATIGUE

11. 1 GENERAL

Fatigue phenomenon shall be analyzed only for those structural elements that are
subjected to repetit•on of sigmficant stress variation (under traffic load). Thus
generally the fatigue shall be regarded only for deck structura part supportmg the
tracks.
..... :......
11.2 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURES

The fat•gue shall be checked as per clause 13.4 of IRS: esc.

~
-- ,

11.3 REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES

I
The fatigue shall be checked as per clause 13.4 of IRS: esc.

11.4 STEEL STRUCTURES

Clause 3.6 of [RS: Steel Bndge Code I clause 13.2 of IRS: welded Bndge Code
shall govem. If J\ values are reQUired to be used, the tra•n closest to the actual
train format1on proposed to be run on the metro system shall be used Other.v1se,
detailed counting of cycles shall be done.

12.0 FOUNDATIONS

(1) IRS: Bndge substr\JCtures and foundation code shall be followed for dcs1qn ot
Foundat1ons.

DESIG'I R:\~IS REPORT-VIADUCT \''i 114

 METRO-UNK EXPRESS FOR GANDHI NAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

(ii) Pile Foundation

For Piles and pile caps, load combinations shall be considered as per IRS:
esc, Table 12. The various specific assumpt•ons made for the pile and pile
cap design •ncluding pile load testmg shall be as per IS: 2911 and IRS:
Bridge substructures and Foundat•on codes.
(iii) Soil structure Analys1s
When design•ng elements forces or estimat•ng displacements the soil
stiffness shall be assessed based on the actual ground da ta .

13.D PILE CAP

It is Incorporated 10 clause 12.0.

14.0 PIER CAP & PIER

For designing the p1er cap as corbel the provisions of clause 17.2.3 of IRS: esc
shall be followed. In case of shear span to effective depth ratio be1ng more than
0.6, pier cap will be designed as nexural members.
The effective length of a cant•lever pier for the purpose of slenderness ratio
calculations shall be done as per IRS: CSC.

15.0 PIER CAP

It is InCorporated •n clause 14.0.

16.0 BEARING SYSTEM AND ITS DESIGN M ETHODOLOGY

16.1 BEARING SYSTEM

Cons•dering the span configuration and safety aspects of the structural system (In
nonma and seism•c condition), •t is proposed to adopt laminated elastomeric
beanngs placed underneath the Box-girder/ PSC-girders for transfer of vertical
forces and a react1on block (protruding above the pier head) for transfer of In-
plane forces. The elastomeric beanng shall be designed as per EN 1337 Part 1
and Part-3 along w1th !RC: 83 Part-II. Wherever EN code is not clear UIC 772 -
2R and along w1th IRC: 83 Part·II shall be followed.

POT cum PTFE or Spherical beanngs may be provided 1f elastomeric beanngs are
not poss•ble to des•gn for spec•al spans. POT -PTFE and spherica bearing shall be
des•gned as per IRC: 83 Part-Ill 2002 and IRC: 83 Pdrt·IV 2014 respectively.

IllS I VII ll.-\SIS REPORT·VIAIJlJCT· \'!; I Is "'. h~CAL t.wl~.RJ N'

_...PLANNII'IG ._ OES ING·4
I
5

· - - - ,.._ T'r'\
I 16. 2 REPLACEABILITY OF BEARINGS
METRO·LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHM EDABAD

While finalizmg the. proposed bearing system, it shall be kept in m1nd that
accessibil ity and replacement of each part of bearing are of paramount
importance as the design hfe of bearings is shorter than that of the stnucture.
Keeping in vtew the above coted cnteria, all the bearings and pier caps w1l be
detailed for replacement of beanngs in the future.

Specia l Low He1ghc jacks shall be employed to replace bearings, if minimum

vertical clearance os less than 400mm as stipulated in clause 15.9.11.3 and
15.9.11.4 of IRS: esc.

16.3
UPLIFT . - ~\{
If required, a holding -down device connecting the deck and the pier head shalf be ·
placed in order to prevent the deck from overturning. Tile holding-down devoce
may be integrated in the pot·beanng system or be a separate system constotuted
of bars embedded in pier cap and viaduct woth appropriate details, permottong
transla tion/rotation. Other systems can also be foreseen.

Due to the lack of appropriate guidelines in Indian codes, the design cnteria for
holding down device (upward •orce limit requonng holding down device, desogn
formulas) will be taken from the latest intematoonal practoce (AASHTO, MOTC
codes) .

17.0 SUPERSTRUCTURE SYSTEM OF VIADUCT

The superstructure shal be simply supported songle cell Box gorder constnucted by
precast segmental constnuction technique woth internal pre-stressing and w1th
epoxy gluing and temporary prestressing of segments. At a few locations
nonstandard/specia l spans are envisaged .e.g. precast post-tensioned I gorders
woth cast on sotu deck slab. In general, super stnucture (Box Girder) woll be
accommodatong two tracks as per approved SOD of"' EGA.

However at crossovers f turnouts I railway crossong s/ hoghway crossings, precast

prestressed !·girder (pre/post tens1oned) f steel girder with cast on sotu slab
concrete deck composite superstructure I vooded Slab unots have been proposed.

M1nomum clearance n case of PSC Superstructure and mm1mum dimens1ons shall

be considered as per Clause 16.9.6 of IRS: CBC.

C?es1gn of superstructure should be done on accordance w1th construcnon

methodology/constructior sequence to be adopted dunng executoon by ).1EGA.

OrSIG'I BASI~ REPORT \'1.\DliC:T~ \"S 16

•
~ j-.- 'ENfRA.LIY't.~~i,1Jr
PLANN ING /1. OESING·;
MEGA CO. LTD.
 METRO-UNK EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

18.0 DRAINAGE

The drainage of ded. shall be des,gned to cater the maximum envisaged rainfall
Intensity and suitable longitudinal and transverse slope should be provided.
Moreover the p rovisions of Clauses 10.4.1.1 & 15.2.2 of IRS: CBC shall be
followed.

Solid Pier
The drain p1pe of double wall HOPE corrugated p1pes w1th water collection box at
lop which w1ll be located within the sohd p1er to avo1d unpleasant aesthet1cs.

Deck
The top of soffit slab w111 be profiled so as to collect the r un -off water at multiple
points by providing a cross slope of 2.5%. Drainage pipes will be prov1ded to
collect the runoff.

19.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS, APPLICABILITY

The IRS Codes shall be followed in principle. Although main clauses have been
mentioned 1n the DBR, the other relevant clauses as available in t he IRS codes
shall also be followed, wherever, applicable. If provis1ons are not available 1n IRS,
the order of preference shall be as follows, unless specified otherwise:

For railway loading related issues:

1. UIC Codes
li. Euro Codes
1ii. Any other code which covers railway_loading

For other Design/ detailing related issues:

1. IRC
11. IS
iii. Euro Code
iv. AASHTO

19.1 IRS CODES (WITH LATEST VERSIONS)

IRS Bndge Rules

IRS Concrete Bndge Code

!RS Bndge subStructure & Foundat1on Code

TRC Steel Bndge Code

IRS FabncatiOfl Code \ B l ) IRS Welded Bndge Code

Df.Sit:N B.-\SI<; RFI'ORT·VI.\IJIICT· \'<; 117 f-rkNFRAL l't't'.~'lo.~l:ifl

/ PLANNING 'l DESING-,
MEGA CO. LTD.
 n
METRO-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD I
I

RDSO Guidelines on SeiSmic Design of Ra1lway Bridges·

January 2015

19.2 IRC CODES (WITH LATEST VERSIONS)

IRC: 5 Standard Spec•ficat•on & Code of Practice for Road Bridges - General
Features of Des1gns

IRC: 6 Standard Spec1f•cat1on & Code of Practice for Road Bridges - Loads and
Stresses

IRC: 18 Design Criteria for Pre-stressed Concrete Road Bridges (Post Tensioned
Concrete)

IRC: 21Standard Spec1ficat10n & Code Of Practice For Road Bridges ·Cement
Concrete (Plain &Remforcement.)

IRC: 22 Standard Spec•f•cat•on & Code of Practice for Road Bndges, Section VI -
Composite Construction for Road Bridges --Cement Concrete (Plain
&Reinforcement.)

IRC: 24 Standard Specification & Code of Practice for Road Bridges,

Section v -Steel Road Bridges

IRC:78Standard Speof•cat•on & Code of Practice for Road Bridges -

Sect1on Foundations & Sub-structure

IRC: 83(I)Standard Spcc•fication & Code of Practice for Road Bridges, Part I
Metallic Bearings

IRC: 83{11) Standacd Specification & Code of Practice for Road Bndges, Part·ll
Elastomeric Beanngs

IRC: 83(1Il) Standard Spec•l•cat•on & Code of Practice for Road Bndges, Part-III
POT, POT-cum-PTFE, Pin and MetalliC Guide Bearings

IRC 83{1V) Standard SpeC1f1cat10n and Code for practice of road bridges, Pa rt IV:
Sphencal and Cyhndncal Bearings.

IRC: 112Code of Practice for Concrete Bridges

IRC· Sp-71 Guidelines for Design and Construction of Pre -cast Pre-Tensioned
Girders for bridges

19.3 IS CODES (WITH LATEST VERSIONS)

IS:269 Specs for Ord.nary and lo" Heat Portland Cement

S;:>ecs •or coarse and 'me aggregate from natural sources for
IS:383
concrete
IS:432 Specs for Mild steel & rned•um tens•le steel-bars (Part 1)

IS:456 Plain and rc1nforcea concrete code of prac.1ce

Ill-SIGN Br\S!S REPORT·\'' \DUCT-\'<; 18 ( July, Zt. I"

fl deNF~t..l ftt,NA GE.R

P_l:_~NN~NG 11._ DESING·,
 METRO-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

IS:800 Code of Practice for General construction in steel

Code of l'o·actice for Design loads Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (Other than
IS:875
Earthquake)
'or Buildong and structures
Design and Construction of shallow foundations on soils (Other than
IS:1080
Raft, Ring
& Shell)
Code of Practice for Pre-stressed Concrete -based essentially on CP-
IS: 1343
110
Hexagon Head Bolts, screws & nuts of product graces A & B Part 1
IS:l364
(Part 1
Hexagon Head Bolts (size range M l :6 to M64}
Ductile Detailing of Reinforced concrete structures subjected to
IS: 13920
seism1c
structures code of practoce
IS:1489 Specifocations for Portland Pozzolana Cement (Fly ash based)
High Strength Deformed steel bars and wires for concrete
IS:1786
reinforcement
IS:l893 Criteroa for Earthquake Resistant Design of structures

IS:l904 Design and Constructoon of Foundatoon in soils General Requirements

IS: 1905 Code of Practice for Structural Use of Un-reinforced Masonry

IS:2062 Specificatoons for Weldable structural stee

Code of Practice for Bending and Fixong of Bars for Concrete
IS:2502
Reinforcement
1S:29ll Code of Practice for Design & Constr. of Pile Foundations Part 1

(Part 1/Sec2) Concrete Poles Sectoon 2 Bored Cast-in-situ Poles (with amendments)
Code of Practice for Design & Constr. of Pile Foundations Part 4 Load
IS:29U
test on
Piles
1S:2950 Designs and Construction of Raft Foundatoons

JS:3935 Code of Practice for Composite Construction

Code of Practice for Earthquake Resostant Design and construction of
JS:4326
Buildongs
IS:4923 Hollow steel sectoons for structural use -speofocation

IS :8009 Calculation of settlement of shallow foundatoons

IS:8112 Specifocatoons for 43 Grade Ordonary Portland cement
Structura Steel -Mocro alloyed (Medium and high strength
IS:8500
quantotoes)
IS:9103 Specifications for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland cement
Code of Practice for Composite Constructoon on Structural Steel and
IS·l!384
Concrete
Code of Practice for Design and Consrructoon of Shal low
Foundatoons on Rocks
IS: 12269 Specofocatoons for 53 Grade Ordonary Por11and cement

IS :-<:268 Uncoated S~ress Relocved Low •l~xatoon S<>vcn-ply Strands for pre

IJESICII ll'\SIS REPUWI' VI.\DlJ<T V> !9

 METRO-U NK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD

stressed
Concrete
Design and Construction of Bored cast-in-Situ Plies Founded on
15:14593
Rocks

19.4 BS Codes (WITH LATEST VERSIONS)

BS: 4447 Specifications for the performance of prestressing anchorage

for post-tensioned concrete.

85:4486 Specifications for high tensile bars used for prestressing.

85: 5400 Code of Practice for Design of Con crete Bridges Part 4 -1990.

85 : 5400 Code of Practice for Fatigue Part 10-1990.

BS: 8006 Code of Practice for strengthened reinforced soils and other
fills - 1995.

BS: 8007 Design of concrete structures for reta ining liquids.

19.5 OTHERS (WITH LATEST VERSIONS)

UIC 776-1R Loads to Consoder In Railway Bndge Design

UIC 776-3R Deformation of Bridges
UIC 772- 2R The Intemat1onal Union of Railway Publication
UIC 774 - 3R Rail Structure Interaction
CEB-FIB Model Code 1990 for concrete structures.
The design relating to Fire safety and escape shall be on accordance with the
requorements of NFPA 130 standard for fixed guide way system
FIP Recommendations for the Acceptance of Post Tensionong Systems
M.O.R.T & Highway Specificatoons
Eu rocode 0 Basis of Structural Design
Eurocode 1 Actions on Structures-Part2: Traffic Loads On bridges
Eurocode 2 Design of Concrete Structures - Partl-1 General Rules and Rules for
Building

Eurocode 2 Design of Concrete Structures-Part 2 Concrete Srodges- Design and

Detailong Ru les

ACl 358.1R-92 (American Concrete Instotute) for assessment of dynamic impact

for transot Guide ways.
RDSO guodehnes for carryong out RS: (Vers•on 2.0) issued in January 2015
BS- 111 version-3 ISsued on Ja,..uary 2015

, /
OFSH;N BASIS REI'ORT-''1 \f>UCT- \"'i 120
~ /../
J 1~ Ju~· 2J 1-
GENFR.t.L fVt,NAGER
. ' l>t ANNf1o.C · "ESII'IG·
¥£ r.ll cr. , ·" •