Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0.7 i I ~ i i i i i ~
0.6
<~ 0.5
~ ~
~ 0.~
I~1
,~
~.~
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 I00
PROTEIN CONCENTRATION, ptg/ML
* Present address, Parke-Davis and Co., l~esearch Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
** Obtained from Warner-Chilcott, Laboratory Supply Division, New York, N.Y.
TABLE I
SATISFACTORY B U F F E R S FOR D E T E R M I N A T I O N OF P R O T E I N CO N CE N T RA T I O N
FROM 2 1 5 - - 2 2 5 m # ABSORPTION
* Tris ( h y d r o x y m e t h y l ) a m i n o m e t h a n e .
STRICKLAND et al. 7 have said that t~is method was not satisfactory when applied
to electrophoretically separated fractions of serum proteins. Their protein fractions
were dissolved in o.I N NaOH which cannot be used as a solvent in WADDELL'S
procedure because of its high absorption in this region of the spectrum. This objection
while valid for solutions which contain o.I N NaOH would not apply if 0.005 N
alkali was used (Table II). NaCl and (NH4)2SO4 solutions commonly encountered in
protein-fractionation procedures do not interfere. This method has been utilized quite
successfully in following the chromatographic separation of guinea-pig-brain proteins
on CM-cellulose columns. For eluting, a NaC1 gradient (o-I.O M) was used in 0.005 M
sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.1).
This spectrophotometric method has great advantages over other procedures in
simplicity, rapidity and sensitivity. Since (NH4)2SO 4 does not interfere with the
determination, it would be particularly useful in following salt fractionations.
The only observed limitation of the method is that many salts and acids com-
monly present in protein solutions absorb in this region of the spectrum. This disad-
TABLE II
D E T E R M I N A T I O N OF P R O T E I N CONCENTRATI ON BY U . V . - A B S O R P T I O N ;
COMPARISON OF W A D D E L L ' S M E T H O D W I T H T H E T E C H N I Q U E OF W A R ] 3 U R G AND C H R I S T I A N
Protein concen*ration(rag~m1)
Protein Buffer
Weight w~r.mmo *~v
CHRISTIAN t WADDlgL4
vantage can be overcome by substituting a solute which does not absorb (see Table I)
or by using such dilute solutions that the buffer solution alone can be used as a blank.
Because of the sensitivity of the method, extreme care must be taken in preparing
the dilutions of the unknown solution.
0.8
&
E
~66o
~a6
~o.~
m"
o.~