Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mineral Status and Interrelationship in Soil, Forage and Blood Serum of Horses in the
Rainy and Dry Season
PII: S0737-0806(16)30519-6
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.09.001
Reference: YJEVS 2180
Please cite this article as: Domínguez-Vara IA, Sánchez-Malváez E, Medina-Navarro P, de Oca-
Jiménez RM, Vieyra Alberto R, Morales-Almaraz E, de la Fuente JL, Sánchez-Torres JE, Bórquez-
Gastelum JL, Acosta-Dibarrat J, Salem AZM, Mineral Status and Interrelationship in Soil, Forage and
Blood Serum of Horses in the Rainy and Dry Season, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (2016), doi:
10.1016/j.jevs.2016.09.001.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Mineral Status and Interrelationship in Soil, Forage and Blood Serum of Horses in the
PT
4
a a a
5 Ignacio A. Domínguez-Vara , Edith Sánchez-Malváez , Pablo Medina-Navarro , Roberto
RI
a a a
6 Montes de Oca-Jiménez , Rodolfo Vieyra Alberto , Ernesto Morales-Almaraz , Jorge Lugo de
SC
b a a
7 la Fuente , Juan E. Sánchez-Torres , José Luis Bórquez-Gastelum , Jorge Acosta-Dibarrat,
a1*
8 Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem
U
9
AN
a
10 Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México,
11 México
M
b
12 Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, México.
13
D
14
TE
*
15 Corresponding author at: Abdelfattah Z.M. Salem, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de
17
C
AC
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18 Abstract
19 The objective was to evaluate the content of P, Ca, Mg, K, Na, Cu, Fe, Zn, Se and Mn in soil,
20 forage and serum of horses in several production units (PU) during rainy and dry season, and
PT
21 predict their concentration in serum from their content in soil and forage. Soil and pastures
22 were sampled in the dry (November-December) and in rainy seasons (June-July), and blood
RI
23 samples were collected from the jugular vein of 76 horses in both seasons at four PU. The
SC
24 experimental design was a completely random design within a 4x2 (PU x season) factorial
25 arrangement of treatments. Concentration of minerals in soil differed (P < .05) among PU, and
U
26 contents of P, Ca, Mg and K was low, Zn and Fe were high, and Cu and Mn were adequate.
AN
27 Mineral concentrations in forage differed among PU and season, and among PU within season
28 (interaction P < .05). Contents of Ca, Mg, Na, Zn and Cu were low, Fe high, and P, K, Se and
M
29 Mn adequate. The mineral concentration in equine blood serum differed (P < .05) among PU
30 and season. Overall, there were deficiencies of P, Ca, Mg, Na, Cu and Se, but adequate
D
31 amounts of K, Zn and Fe. There are imbalances of minerals in soil and forages which effected
TE
34
C
35 1. Introduction
AC
36 The feeding and nutrition of livestock becomes less of an empirical endeavor when the
38 influenced by genetic, nutritional, health and management factors. Thus optimal nutrition is
39 essential for a foal to achieve maximal performance. Likewise, nutrition is fundamental for
40 husbandry purposes as several reproductive problems due to nutritional deficiencies have been
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
41 identified [2].
42 Mineral sources for horses are typically forages and grain cereals. As mineral availability
43 depends on soil concentration, forage maturity, plant species, harvest conditions and method
PT
44 of conservation, the mineral contents of feeds cause mineral variations in blood serum [3].
45 According to the NRC [4], there are 14 essential minerals for equines, 7 macrominerals (i.e.
RI
46 Ca, P, Mg, K, Na, Cl, S), and 7 microminerals (i.e. Cu, Zn, Fe, Se, Co, I, Mn).
SC
47 In Mexico, there are ~1.33 million horses, of which ~74,000 are in the State of Mexico [5].
48 In many regions in the country, horses are important to agricultural activities but nutritional
U
49 problems are often not addressed. For this reason, research in equine mineral nutrition is
AN
50 scarce and frequently minerals are not taken into account when balancing rations. Signs and
51 symptoms associated with mineral deficiencies have been identified in grazing horses, yet few
M
52 are diagnosed as a result of laboratory assays. Research conducted in the central region of
53 Mexico suggests mineral deficiencies in soils, forages, as well as bovine and ovine blood
D
54 serum [6-8].
TE
55 Our purpose was to obtain information on the mineral nutrition of grazing horses fed feed
EP
56 supplements in the rainy and dry season. In addition, identification of mineral imbalances
57 were identified, as well as the relationships between minerals in soils, plants and blood serum.
C
58
AC
61 The study took place in four different horse production units (PU) in rural and suburban
62 areas located in the Valley of Toluca (Mexico), which is at a northern latitude between 19° 51’
63 and 19° 15’; and a longitude between 99° 26’ and 99° 28’. The altitude is between 1,850 and
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
64 2,670 m asl, and the precipitation is 800 and 1000 mm in spring and summer. The weather is
66 [9]. The PU had similar management systems that consisted of stall time and some grazing,
PT
67 but without mineral supplementation. The soil is variably classified as Gleysol, Cambisol,
68 Andosol and Litosol [10]. The paddocks in the PU were 1.5 to 3 hectares, and the prevalent
RI
69 grass species were Lupinus montanus, Lupinus exaltatus, the native grass Muhlenbergia
SC
70 mabroura, Stipa ichum, Tagetes coronopifolia, and the exotic grass Pennisetum clandestinum.
71
U
72 2.2. Animals and Management
AN
73 In the PU used, there were adult horses that graze, are fed a concentrate but without
74 mineral supplementation. The PU, with their number of their horses and paddocks are:
M
80 emaciation, weight loss, alopecia, leukoderma and fatigue, and lameness, possibly due to
C
81 mineral unbalances in all PU. The horses in both La Joya and Hurtado had an adequate body
AC
82 score, those in Zinacantepec and Jilotepec had some angular deviations, and in Zinacantepec
83 there was some issues of articular and tendon sheath effusion, but clinically attributable to the
86 From every PU samples were obtained of soil (rainy season), as well as forage and equine
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
87 blood during the rainy (July) and dry (November) seasons of 2005. Soil and forage sampling
2
88 techniques were stratified by dividing the grazing area of all PU into 2500 – 3000 m parcels.
89 In each parcel, from 8 to 20 primary samples of 0.5 - 1 kg of soil were obtained, and 5
PT
90 combined samples (1 kg) were created for each PU. Forage was collected in the same area as
91 the soil samples, and 5 combined samples per PU were obtained by hand plucking [11]. Table
RI
92 1 shows the soil, forage and serum samples obtained. Blood was obtained from the jugular
SC
93 vein of 20 adult horses. Serum was then isolated from blood, labeled and preserved at -20°C
94 for later analysis. Soil P was measured by means of the Bray-P1 method with samples for Ca,
U
95 Mg and K analysis extracted with 1 molar ammonium acetate prior to Ca and Mg assays
AN
96 determined by the volumetric EDTA method and K by flame emission spectrophotometry.
97 Samples for Zn, Cu and Fe were extracted in DTPA and assayed by atomic absorption
M
98 spectrophotometry [12]. Soil pH was measured in a 1:2 water dilution, and electric
100 Walkley and Black’s method [13]. In forages and serum samples, P was measured by
TE
101 colorimetry [14], Ca, Mg, K, Na, Cu, Zn and Fe by atomic absorption spectrophotometry [12]
EP
103
C
105 A completely randomized design was used. In a linear model, soil mineral analysis
106 considered PU effect as a fixed effect. For analysis of mineral concentrations in forage and
107 serum the effects considered were: PU, season and its interaction. For the minerals in equine
108 serum, a regression analysis was completed by means of the stepwise procedure [16]. Also, a
109 variance analysis was completed and means compared by means of Tukey’s test [17].
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
110
111 3. Results
112 Differences (P < .05) occurred due to PU in P, Ca, Mg, Zn, Fe and Mg content, as well as
PT
113 in pH, OM and conductivity (Table 2). The PU effect also occurred (P < .05) in Cu and Fe
114 content, whereas there was a season effect (P < .05) in forage Na, Cu and Fe (Table 3). Table 4
RI
115 shows forage content of P, Ca, Mg, K, Zn, Se and Mn. PU and season effects occurred in the
SC
116 mineral content of the serum (Table 5). The regression equations obtained predicted (P < .05)
117 P, Ca, Na, Cu, Zn, Fe and Se contents in equine serum from forage mineral content (Table 6).
U
118
AN
119 3.1. Solis Mineral Concentration
120 There was a difference (P < .05) in The P concentration between Hurtado and La Joya, and
M
121 between Zinacantepec and Jilotepec where soil P was higher in the latter. Soil P in all PU
122 were below the critical value of 25 ppm, meaning that all samples were P deficient relative to
D
123 plant growth. There was a difference (P < .05) in the Ca concentration between PU, with the
TE
124 highest content at Zinacantepec, with Hurtando and La Joya below the critical value of 900
EP
125 ppm. Differences (P < .05) occurred for Mg concentration with Hurtado and La Joya having a
127 There were no differences for K concentration between PU, and all PU were below the
AC
128 critical value of 60 ppm; meaning that 92% of samples were K deficient. The concentration of
129 Zn in the PUs differed (P < .05), although only in Hurtado was the Zn concentration below 2
131 There were no differences between soils for Cu, but Hurtado and La Joya had values
132 slightly above 0.6 ppm. The presence of absorption limiting factors such as excess Fe are
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
133 likely to cause a Cu deficiency in forages. All soils had an excess of Fe, with values well
134 above 4.5 ppm. No differences occurred for Mn among PU, and Mn in these soils was normal.
135 There were differences (P < .05) in soil pH among PU, and for OM content which
PT
136 averaged 4.67%. For soil electric conductivity, differences (P < .05) occurred between PU,
RI
138
SC
139 3.2. Forages Mineral Concentration
140 For P, except for Zinacantepec during the dry season and Hurtado during the rainy season,
U
141 the other PU, and between seasons, had forages which did not meet the nutrient requirement of
AN
142 horses. Furthermore, 98% of samples were P deficient and coincident with the previously
143 noted soil P deficiency. The Ca content in both seasons at Hurtado, during the rainy season in
M
144 La Joya and during the dry season in Jilotepec was all below the critical value. While 85% of
145 samples were deficient for P, this was only true for only 30% of soil samples. The effect (P <
D
146 .05) of the interaction of UP and season for forage Ca may be because in La Joya, during the
TE
147 rainy season, Ca was lower than during the dry season.
EP
148 Except for Jilotepec during the dry season, Mg content was adequate at all other PU and
149 seasons, and met equine requirements. For K, an interaction occurred (P < .05) for UP by
C
150 season. There were no differences in Na concentrations among PU and, in each, the mean was
AC
151 above the critical value. However only in Hurtado during the rainy season was the
152 requirement for equines met as 91% of samples were Na deficient. For Fe, differences (P <
153 .05) occurred among PU. Except for Zinacantepec during the dry season, forage Zn was
154 deficient and did not satisfy the requirement of horses. The interaction (P < .05) of PU by
155 season effected forage Se, but it was not deficient. In Hurtado and La Joya during the rainy
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
157
PT
159 Mean serum P was below the critical value for horses in Zinacantepec and La Joya during
160 the dry season, serum Ca was above the critical value for horses. The interaction (P < .05) of
RI
161 PU by season may be because in Hurtado and Jilotepec during the dry season the Ca content
SC
162 was higher than during the rainy season. The Mg content in horses in Zinacantepec during
163 both seasons, in La Joya during the dry season, and in Jilotepec during the rainy season, was
U
164 below the critical value.
AN
165 No Zn deficiencies occurred and no PU was Cu deficient, but 53% of samples were
166 deficient. There were no differences in in the Fe concentration; however, in La Joya and
M
167 Hurtado during the dry season, and in Jilotepec during the rainy season, there was an Fe
168 excess. For Se, no PU had values below the critical level of 0.05 µg/mL. However, 56% of
D
169 samples were Se deficient. In Hurtado during the dry season and in La Joya during the rainy
TE
171
2
172 Cu, Mn, Zn and Se content in forage. Likewise, serum Na concentration (R =0.65; P < .05) is
C
174 For microminerals, serum Cu content (R2=0.54; P < .05) is explained by Na, K, Fe, Mn
2
175 and Se content in forage; serum Zn (R =0.76; P < .05) by Na, Ca, Mn, Zn and Se in forage;
2
176 serum Fe (R =0.97; P < .05) by Na, Ca, P, Cu, Mn, Zn and Se in forage and, lastly, serum Se
2
177 (R =0.94; P < .05) by Na, K, Ca, P, Fe, Zn and Se in forage.
178
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
179 4. Discussion
181 Results suggest that a substantial difference between forages would have to be
PT
182 demonstrated in order to create an important correlation between forage mineral and serum
183 mineral contents. Even if all physiological and hormonal effects are ignored, forages that do
RI
184 not show a substantive deficiency would positively correlate to all horses. Furthermore, since
SC
185 horses must maintain mineral homeostasis in order live, it is paramount to account for
186 hormonal and physiological effects. For example, blood Ca is regulated by hormonal balances
U
187 (i.e., calcitonin and parathyroid hormone), meaning that unless a substantial excess, or lack, of
AN
188 Ca can be demonstrated in the forages and feeds consumed, it is likely that blood Ca for
189 healthy horses would be expected to be within homeostatic limits. Thus because Ca content is
M
190 fixed physiologically, anything that has Ca could appear to correlate with serum Ca content.
191
D
193 That no differences occurred for soil pH between PU; La Joya was moderately acidic,
EP
194 Zinacantepec and Jilotepec slightly acidic, and in Hurtado slightly alkaline [18]. Slightly
196 Soils high in OM are rich in phosphates and K [22] and, during spring, K content increases
AC
197 due to OM accumulation [23]. Gastorena [24] described soils in the region as deep alluvial,
198 and of a sandy and loamy texture, with 9 to 15% OM, and a pH of 6.0 - 6.5, with mineral
199 contents of: P, 8 to 20 ppm; Ca, 800 to 2000 ppm; Mg, 200 to 400 ppm; and K, 168 ppm.
200 Different soil electric conductivity occurred between PU. With the lowest value for La
201 Joya, indicating that La Joya has saline soil whereas the other PU have only slightly saline
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
203
PT
205 The interaction of PU by season in forage P may be because, in Zinacantepec during the
206 rainy season, its content was lower than in the dry season. The P content (0.25% DB), was
RI
207 lower than the 0.35% and 0.32% (DB) in ryegrass and native grasses in the same region
SC
208 (Morales-Almaráz et al [6], and Domínguez-Vara and Huerta-Bravo [7]), respectively.
209 In La Joya, forage Ca was correlated with soil content and soil acidity (pH=5.5), as
U
210 occurred in our study. The forage Ca (0.35% DB) in our study is consistent with values of
AN
211 Morales-Almaráz et al [6], and Domínguez-Vara and Huerta-Bravo [7]. The interaction of UP
212 by season for forage Ca may be because in La Joya during the rainy season it was lower than
M
214 Forage Mg was correlated with soil Mg, but only in Hurtado was there a value below 20
D
215 ppm. The effect of the interaction of UP by season for forage Mg may be because in
TE
216 Zinacantepec and Jilotepec during the dry season Mg was higher than during the rainy season.
EP
217 In our study, grasses were found to have 1.5% (DB) Mg, which in enough for horses. Morales-
218 Almaráz et al [6], and Domínguez-Vara and Huerta-Bravo [7] reported a Mg content of 0.25%
C
219 in ryegrass and 0.26% (DB) in native grasses in the same region.
AC
220 No K deficiency in forage occurred, which is not consistent with the soil K values. But
221 forages had 2.13% (DM) K, enough to satisfy equine requirements [25]. Morales-Almaráz et
222 al [6] found K content was 1.39% in ryegrass, and Domínguez-Vara and Huerta-Bravo [7]
223 1.31% in native grasses. The effect of interaction of PU by season in forage K may be because
224 in Zinacantepec during the rainy season K was lower than that of the dry season.
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
225 The mean Na concentration was above the critical value with 91% of samples Na
226 deficient. Sodium deficits can affect feed and water intake leading to dehydration [25].
227 Morales-Almaráz et al [6] reported a Na content of 0.35% (DM) for ryegrass in the same
PT
228 region. For Cu, differences occurred between PU and, in all during both seasons, the forages
229 did not supply equine requirements and 100% of samples were Cu deficient. Research in the
RI
230 region confirms an endemic Cu deficiency in soil, forage and grazing sheep [7], which could
SC
231 be associated with high Fe contents in soil and forage, and soil acidity.
232 Every PU had signs of Fe excess, which was well above equine requirements during both
U
233 seasons. Iron interferes with Cu absorption, which could affect horses [26]. In non-ruminant
AN
234 adults, Fe absorption is 15% or less, but higher in neonates [4]. Forages and cereals contribute
236 Forages were Zn-deficient (20.2 ppm) in all samples which does not correspond with soil
237 levels. Morales-Almaráz et al [6] found a Zn content of 22.5 ppm in ryegrass, and Domínguez-
D
238 Vara and Huerta-Bravo [7] reported 26 ppm for native grasses. Plants absorb less Zn in
TE
239 alkaline soils with high Ca [28]. According to Huerta [29], forages in Central Mexico are Zn
EP
240 deficient. The effect of the interaction of PU by season for Zn may be because in Zinacantepec
242 Forages had 0.39 ppm Se, a higher value than found by Morales-Almaráz et al [6] in
AC
243 ryegrass. Díaz [30] found soil, forage and grazing sheep to be Se deficient in the same region.
244 The interaction of PU by season for forage Se may be because in Jilotepec forage Se was
245 higher during the rainy season. In the other PU, forage Se was lower during the rainy season.
246 About 63% of samples were Mn deficient, which can lead to bone and cartilage problems
247 in developing foals [25]. Forage has 25 to 190 ppm Mn and cereals 6 to 45 ppm Mn, as
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
249
PT
251 About 44% of samples were P-deficient. The effect of the interaction of PU by season may
252 be because in Jilotepec during the rainy season, P was lower than during the dry season.
RI
253 According to the NRC [31], P values ranging from 1.5 to 3 mg/100 mL are deficient, and from
SC
254 3.5 to 5.0 mg/100 mL are adequate. Horses in our study had values as low as 2.8 mg/100 mL.
255 Rickets is a sign of P deficiency in young animals [32] and P excretion increases when Ca
U
256 intake is high leading to a reduced calcification which, if uncorrected, leads to poor appetite
AN
257 and stunted growth [4]. In contrast, excess P leads to fibrous osteodystrophy, which clinical
258 signs being lameness and long bone fragility as excess P hinders Ca absorption and Ca
M
260 According to the NRC [25], serum Ca for horses should be between 11 and 13 mg/dL. In
D
261 La Joya, adequate levels occurred (12.2 mg/dL), yet in the other three PU the serum Ca was
TE
262 excessive. According to Lewis [33], horses suffer from Ca and P imbalances more than any
EP
263 other mineral, and a Ca deficiency leads to bone resorption with fibrous tissue proliferation. In
264 adult horses, facial and cranial bone size is augmented. Calcium deficiency can be associated
C
265 with excessive P intake and, during growth, bone abnormalities and deformations such as
AC
267 About 48% of samples were Mg deficient. The interaction of PU by season may be
268 because in Hurtado and Jilotepec during the dry season the serum Mg was higher than during
269 the rainy season. Since. according to the NRC [4] and Puls [35], serum Mg ranges between 2
270 to 5 mg/dL, in Zinacantepec horses were deficient whereas the rest were normal.
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
271 According to the NRC [4] and Puls [35], normal serum K ranges between 5 and 22 mg/dL.
272 All horses had normal levels. In all PU, serum Na was below the critical value, and 100% of
273 samples were deficient. The effect of the interaction of PU by season, may be because in
PT
274 Hurtado and Jilotepec during the dry season serum the Na content was higher than in the rainy
275 season.
RI
276 No Zn deficiencies occurred and the interaction of PU by season may be because in
SC
277 Hurtado, Zinacantepec and La Joya during the dry season serum the Zn content was higher.
278 Normal serum Zn is 0.6 and 1.7 µg/mL [4,25,35]. On average, serum Zn was above the normal
U
279 value for horses in our study. According to Underwood and Suttle [36], livestock are tolerant
AN
280 to high dietary Zn, but it also depends on species and Ca, Cu, Fe and Cd intake. Wichert et al
281 [37] found Zn values in equine serum between 0.6 to 1.0 µg/mL.
M
282 About 53% of samples were Cu deficient. The interaction of PU by season may be because
283 in Jilotepec the Cu was higher during the dry season. According to NRC [4,25], normal serum
D
284 Cu values are 1 to 1.9 µg/mL; Wichert et al [37] found serum Cu values of 0.5 to 1.5 µg/mL.
TE
285 No differences occurred for Fe. The interaction of UP by season may be because in Hurtado
EP
286 and La Joya, serum Fe was higher during the dry season. Normal serum Fe ranges between 1
287 to 1.5 µg/mL [4,25] but, in this study, concentrations up to 2 µg/mL occurred. Iron absorption
C
288 depends on source, health status, age, and mineral balance [38].
AC
289 The interaction of PU by season for Se may be because in Hurtado, Zinacantepec and La
290 Joya, Se concentration was higher during the dry season. Since, in horses, 0.14 µg/mL Se is
291 considered normal [4,25], La Joya had deficiencies (0.11 µg/mL), but Zinacantepec (0.14
292 µg/mL), Jilotepec (0.15 µg/mL) and Hurtado (0.22 µg/mL) values were normal. Harper and
293 Gill [39] reported muscular dystrophy in Se deficient mares, and ataxia in foals, presumably
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
294 due to low Se intake during gestation and lactation. Wichert et al [37] reported serum Se
295 between 0.05 and 0.2 µg/mL, in both summer and winter, with a mean of 0.083 µg/mL, which
296 is below the normal value [4,25], yet without locomotor issues.
PT
297
RI
299 Calcium and P were in 5 of 7 equations, whereas Zn and Se occurred in 6. This may be
SC
300 relevant because Zn, Se and Cu deficiencies have been identified in the region in both forage
301 and dairy cattle [6], in forage and sheep [7,30], and also Ca and Fe excess in soils and forage.
U
302 Forage Ca excess hinders Zn absorption, and Fe excess hinders Cu absorption, which leads to
AN
303 low serum values [40]. Soils with a high OM content have little available Cu [41]; and acidic
304 soils (pH≤5.5) hinder plant Cu absorption [42]. A high content of soil Zn will increase its
M
305 content in forage and serum, but high dietary Ca will reduce Zn absorption and its serum
306 concentration [43]. Previous research in the region has developed equations to predict serum
D
307 Ca, P, K, Fe and Cu from their levels in soil and forage for dairy cattle [6]. Similar equations
TE
308 have been developed to predict serum P, Zn and Cu in sheep from soil and forage [7]. Results
EP
310
C
311 5. Conclusions
AC
312 Imbalances occurred in soil minerals (i.e. low concentrations of P, Ca, Mg and K and high
313 concentrations of Fe), as well as in forage (i.e. low concentrations of Ca, Mg, Na, Zn and Cu;
314 and high for Fe). These low values affected blood serum mineral concentrations (i.e. marginal
315 values for P, Ca, Mg, Na, Cu and Se) and so would be expected to have an effect on the health
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
317
318 References
319 [1] Church DC. Livestock feeds and feeding. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, U.S.A., 546 pp; 1991.
PT
320 [2] Pérez de Ayala EP. Nutrición y Alimentación del Caballo. XI Curso de Especialización
RI
321 FEDNA. Trouw Iberica, S.A. Barcelona, España, 195 pp., 1995
322 [3] Underwood EJ, Suttle NF. Los minerales en la nutrición del Ganado. 3a ed. Acribia.
SC
323 España, 637 pp; 2002.
324 [4] NRC. Nutrient requirements of Horses. National Research Council. 6th ed. National
327 2009.
M
329 Castelán Ortega O, Pescador Salas N, Huerta Bravo M. Diagnóstico mineral en forraje y
TE
330 suero sanguíneo de bovinos lecheros en dos épocas en el valle central de México. Tec Pecu
333 forraje y suero de ovinos durante dos épocas en el Valle de Toluca, México. Agrociencia
C
335 [8] Vieyra AR. Perfil mineral en suelo, agua, forraje y suero sanguíneo de bovinos de doble
337 Autónoma del Estado de México. Toluca, México; 2012, 110 pp.
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
340 [10] INEGI. Territorio Nacional. [en línea]. Disponible en www.inegi.org.mx. (revisado 15 de
342 [11] Wayne CC. Symposium on nutrition of forages and pastures: Colecting forages samples
PT
343 representative of ingested material of grazing animals for nutritional studies. J Anim Sci
RI
345 [12] Fick KR, Mc Dowell LR, Wilkinson NS, Funk DJ, Conrad JH, Valdivia R. Métodos de
SC
346 análisis de minerales para tejidos de plantas y animales. Departamento de Ciencia Animal.
U
348 [13] Semarnat. Norma Oficial Mexicana 021. Especificaciones de fertilidad, salinidad y
AN
349 clasificación de suelos, muestreo y análisis. Diario Oficial de la Federación, México; 2000.
350 [14] Harris W, Popat D. Determination of the phosphorus content of lipids. Am. Oil. Chem.
M
352 [15] AOAC. Oficial methods of analysis (15th ed). Association of Oficial Analytical Chemist,
D
354 [16] Statistical Analysis System. Software (Versión 9.0). User´s Guide. N.C., USA; 2002.
EP
355 [17] Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. Principles and procedures of statistics a biometrical
356 approach. 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Series in Probability and Statistics. Printed in the United
C
358 [18] Fitzpatrick EA. Introducción a la ciencia de los Suelos. Trillas, México, 250 pp; 1996.
359 [19] Reid RL, Horvath D. Soil chemistry and mineral problems in farm livestock. A review.
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
361 [20] Tavera G. Criterios para interpretación y aprovechamiento de los reportes de laboratorio
362 para las áreas de asistencia técnica. Publ. No. 3. Sociedad Mexicana de la Ciencia del
PT
364 [21] Terrón PV, Rojo HC. Condiciones del Suelo y Desarrollo de las Plantas según Russell.
RI
366 [22] Tisdale S, Nelson W. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. McMilan PubCo, NY, USA; 1975.
SC
367 [23] Black CA. Soil Plants Relationships. 2nd ed. Willey. New York, USA; 1968.
368 [24] Gastorena de AG. Propiedades físicas y químicas del suelo del Valle de Toluca. Congreso
U
369 Nacional de la Ciencia del Suelo. México, D.F., 195 pp; 1971.
AN
370 [25] NRC. Nutrient requirements of Horses. National Research Council. National Academy
372 [26] Humphries WE, Breme I, Phillippo M. The influence of dietary iron on copper
373 metabolism in the calf. In: C. F. Mills, I. Bremner, and J. K. Chesters (Eds), Proc. Fifth Int.
D
374 Symposium on Trace Element in Man and Animals. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux,
TE
376 [27] Shotola K, Culver A, Wall L. Horse Nutrition. Ohio State University, Bu,; 2011.
377 [28] Miller WJ. Copper and zinc in ruminant nutrient. In: B. O’Dell, E.K. Miller, W.J. Miller
C
379 [29] Huerta B. Nutrición mineral de rumiantes en pastoreo. Memorias Curso Alternativas de
380 Manejo de Bovinos Carne en Pastoreo. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, México, 142 pp;
381 1997.
382 [30] Díaz ZS. Determinación de la actividad de Glutation Peroxidasa (GSH-Px) y niveles de
383 selenio en sangre de ovinos y niveles de selenio en suelo y pasto de áreas ovinas de San
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
384 Felipe del Progreso, México. Tesis de Maestría, FMVZ-UAEM. Toluca, México, 115 pp;
385 1993.
386 [31] NRC. Mineral tolerance of animals. 2nd ed. National Academy Press, USA; 2005.
PT
387 [32] Church DC, Pond WG, Pond K. Fundamentos de Nutrición y Alimentación de Animales.
RI
389 [33] Lewis LD. Alimentación y cuidado del caballo. Intermedia. B.A., Argentina, 350 pp;
SC
390 1991.
391 [34] Rosset WM. Alimentación de los caballos. Aedos, Barcelona, España, 350 pp; 1993.
U
392 [35] Puls R. Mineral levels in Animal Health. 2nd ed. Diagnostic data. Sherpa International.
AN
393 Clearbrook B. C. Trinity Western University Press, Canada; 1988.
394 [36] Underwood EJ Suttle NF. The mineral nutrition of livestock. Cabi Publ. USA; 1999.
M
395 [37] Wichert B, Frank T, Kienzle E. Zinc, cooper and selenium intake and status of horses in
397 [38] Bromiley M. Métodos naturales para la salud del caballo. Acribia, España; 1994.
TE
398 [39] Harper F, Gill W. Minerals for Horses, Part II. Trace Minerals. Tennessee Horse Express.
EP
401 [40] Phillippo M. The role of dose response trials in predicting trace elements deficiency
AC
403 [41] Haynes RJ. Micronutrients status of a group of soils in Cantenbury, New Zeland, as
404 measured by extraction with EDTA, DTPA and HCL, and its relationship with plant
405 response to applied Cu and Zn. J Agric Sci Cambridge 1997; 129, 325-333.
406 [42] COSAC. Trace Elements Deficiency in Ruminants. Edinburgh, Scotland, Pp.49-50; 1982.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
407 [43] Aubert H, Pinta M. Trace Elements in Soil. Elsevier. New York, USA, 560 pp; 1977.
408 [44] De Sousa JC. Interrelationships among mineral levels in soil, forages, and animal tissues
409 on ranches in Northern Mato Grosso Brasil. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida,
PT
410 Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A., 135 pp; 1978.
411 [45] ARC. Agricultural Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock.
RI
412 Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau. Farm Ham Royal. UK; 1980.
SC
413
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
414 Table 1
415 Soil, forage and equine serum samples, as analyzed by PU and season.
PT
Locality (PU) (Dry) Dry Wet Dry Wet
Hurtado 10 8 4 11 10
RI
Zinacantepec 6 6 6 21 20
SC
La Joya 6 16 10 25 17
Jilotepec 8 8 10 26 22
U
Total2 30 38 30 83 69
AN
416
1
417 Total horses sampled per season differ owe to deaths and sales.
M
2
418 Total samples analyzed: soil 30, forage 68, serum 152 (mean per season=76).
419 Table 2
D
420 Mineral concentration, pH, OM and electric conductivity (dSm/1, desisiemmens/m) in soils
TE
423 P Ca Mg K Zn Cu Fe Mn pH MO dS/m
425 ___________________________________________________________________________
AC
426 Hurtado 8.4b 600b 20.0d 20.4a 1.5c 0.8a 44.0b 27.0b 7.5a 1.7b 0.14ab
427 Zinacantepec 16.2ª 1900a 50.3b 30.0a 15.5a 1.3a 16.7c 65.2a 6.3b 8.4b 0.17a
428 La Joya 9.5ab 7.0b 3.7c 2.5a 8.9ab 1.0a 95.7a 82.5a 5.5c 3.7b 0.07c
429 Jilotepec 16.7a 17.2b 6.7a 2.3a 6.9bc 4.5a 63.5b 22.5b 6.2b 4.9b 0.12b
1
430 SEM 1.4 0.9 0.3 0.2 1.4 0.8 4.8 5.3 0.15 1.6 0.03
2
431 PU effect ** ** ** ns ** ns ** ** ** ** **
3
432 Critical level 25 900 30 60 2.0 0.60 4.5 -----
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
433 Deficiency 32/94 34/100 34/100 34/100 18/53 4/12 0/0 -----
434 ___________________________________________________________________________
a,b,c,d
435 Means in the same column with distinct letter differ (*P<0.05, **P<0.01).
1
436 SEM= Standard Error of Mean.
PT
2
437 PU= Production Unit.
3
438 Tavera [20]; Terrón and Rojo [21]; Tisdale and Nelson [22]; De Sousa [44].
RI
4
439 Number and percentage of analyzed samples with deficient concentrations.
440
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
441 Table 3
442 Concentration of Na, Cu and Fe (ppm) in native forages from four stables of horses. .
443 ___________________________________________________________________________
PT
444 PU/season Na Cu Fe
RI
446 ___________________________________________________________________________
SC
447 Hurtado 0.10a 4.3b 369.0b
U
449 La joya 0.06a 5.5ab 261.4b
AN
450 Jilotepec 0.07ª 6.7a 1149.3a
1
454 SEM 0.06 1.2 231.4
TE
2
455 Requirement 0.18 10.00 50.0
3
EP
458 ___________________________________________________________________________
AC
a,b,c; x,y
459 Means with distinct letter in the same column differ (P < .05).
1
460 Standard Error of Mean.
2
461 Requirements of adult horses 450-500 kg BW, moderate physical work [25].
3
462 NRC [25]; Shotola et al [27]; Harper and Gill [39]; ARC [45].
4
463 Number and percentage of deficient analyzed samples.
464 Table 4
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
465 Effect of interaction PU by season on mineral content of native forages from four stables.
466 ____________________________________________________________________________
467 PU Season P Ca Mg K Zn Se Mn
PT
468 ----------------(%DM-------------- ------------(ppm)-------------
469 ____________________________________________________________________________
RI
470 Hurtado Dry 0.74ª
471 Wet 0.30ab 0.28b 0.19a 2.18ab 18.0b 0.24d 22.0c
0.33a 0.37b 0.20a 2.56ab 33.4a 0.52bc 135.8a
SC
472 Zinacantepec Dry
473 Wet 0.22cd 0.69a 0.15 2.22ab 17.4b 0.26d 48.4bc
474 La Joya Dry 0.22dc 0.42b 0.15a 1.95ab 15.9b 0.53b 35.2bc
U
475 Wet 0.28abc 0.23b 0.17ab 2.42ab 17.4b 0.20d 27.7c
AN
476 Jilotepec Dry 0.17d 0.22b 0.09c 3.00a 16.6b 0.30d 76.6b
477 Wet 0.24c 0.41b 0.13bc 1.42b 20.2b 0.35cd 64.3bc
1
478 SEM 0.006 0.60 0.005 0.14 1.19 0.02 5.07
M
479 Probability (P <) 0.001 0.01 0.002 0.01 0.03 0.006 0.03
2
480 Requirement 0.30 0.35 0.09 0.40 40.00 0.10 40.00
D
3
481 Critical level 0.15 0.20 0.05 0.20 30.0 0.05 30.00
TE
4
482 Deficiency 67/98 58/85 67/98 0/0 68/100 12/17 43/63
483 ____________________________________________________________________________
EP
a,b,c,d
484 Means with distinct letter in the same column differ P < .05).
1
485 Standard Error of Mean.
C
2
486 Requirements of adult horses 450-500 kg BW, moderate physical work [4,25].
AC
3
487 NRC [25]; Shotola et al [27]; Harper and Gill [39]; ARC [45].
4
488 Number and percentage of deficient analyzed samples.
489
490 Table 5
491 Effect of interaction PU by season on mineral concentration in horses serum from four stables.
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
492 ____________________________________________________________________________
493 PU Season P Ca Mg Na Zn Cu Fe Se
PT
495 ____________________________________________________________________________
496 Hurtado Dry 3.8b 21.9a 2.8a 42.2a 3.2c 0.9cd 3.2b 0.31ª
6.1a 16.4bc 2.2bc 39.5ab 2.6c 1.1a 2.6bc 0.11b
RI
497 Wet
498 Zinacantepec Dry 2.3c 13.5c 1.7d 32.9cd 7.2a 1.0abcd 2.2c 0.16b
3.4b 16.2bc 1.7d 37.4abc 2.6c 1.1a 2.3bc 0.12b
SC
499 Wet
500 La Joya Dry 2.5c 10.8d 1.9cd 29.5d 4.7b 0.8d 4.1a 0.13b
501 Wet 3.4b 14.3c 2.2bc 36.3bc 4.0bc 1.1ab 2.7bc 0.08b
U
502 Jilotepec Dry 3.7b 17.5b 2.6ab 40.5ab 3.1c 1.0abc 2.4bc 0.13b
AN
503 Wet 3.4b 15.4bc 1.9cd 36.2bc 7.2a 0.9bcd 3.3b 0.16b
504 SEM1 1.14 0.48 0.07 0.89 0.26 0.03 0.15 0.01
505 Probability (P<) 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01
M
2
506 Normal concentration 3-5 11-13 2-3.5 330 0.6-1.7 0.8-2.0 0.8-2.5 0.15-0.25
2
507 Critical level 3.0 9.0 2.0 300 0.60 0.65 1.0 0.05
D
3
508 Deficiency 67/44 17/11 74/48 152/100 0/0 81/53 0/0 85/56
TE
509 ____________________________________________________________________________
a,b,c,d
510 Means with distinct letter in the same column differ (P < .05).
EP
1
511 Standard Error of Mean. PU=production unit.
2
512 NRC [4,25]; Puls [35]; ARC [45].
3
C
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
515 Table 6
516 Regression equations to predict mineral concentration in serum of horses from four stables. .
517 ____________________________________________________________________________
PT
518 General equation: Y = β0+β1x ó Y = β0+β1x1+β2x2 R2 P≤
519 ____________________________________________________________________________
RI
1 3
520 PS =4.2+107(NaF )-8.8(CaF)+25.4(PF)-1.4(CuF)+0.16(MnF)-1(ZnF)+16.6(SeF) 0.89 *
SC
2
521 CaS=55.4-499.4(MgF )+104.0(PF)-0.0193(FeF)+1.15(ZnF)-10.4 (SeF) 0.59 *
U
523
AN
2
524 CuS =-1.7+9.13(NaF)+0.56(KF)+0.0002(FeF)-0.002(MnF)+2.06(SeF) 0.54 *
528 ____________________________________________________________________________
TE
1
529 Macrominerals in serum (mg/dL): CaS, MgS, KS, NaS
2
EP
532
AC
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights to reviewers:
PT
3. Higher regression effect (R2=0.97) in serum iron with forage
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC