English is recognize as the first foreign language and the compulsory subjects

taught in secondary level (Komaria, 1998: 29 in Lauder, 2008). At present, English

is only taught in senior high school once a week (Curriculum 2013). With the
minimum of exposure of learning English, the students cannot maximize their English
mastery. In the curriculum 2013, all textbooks, guideline are come from the
ministry of education rather than from school and publishing companies (OECD, 2015,
p.269). The Curriculum 2013 is more centralized and might neglect the local
curriculum that school have. Also from sudden change of curriculum, OECD (2015,
p.270) found confusion about the role of the local curriculum, with some
principals believing that they should stop teaching English or local languages, for
example, because there was no longer any local flexibility and these areas were not
defined as separate subjects.

The 2013 English Curriculum seems to be the reactions or correction of the previous
curriculum and the reality that has happened (Wachidah, 2013). However, in actual
fact that high school learner in Indonesia hardly use English for communication and
daily activities.

Nur, M. R., & Madkur, A. (2014). Teachers� Voices on the 2013 Curriculum for
English Instructional Activities. International Journal of English Education, 1(2),
119�134.

OECD/Asian Development Bank (2015), Education in Indonesia: Rising to the

Challenge, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264230750-en

Lengkanawati, N. S. (2005). EFL teachers� competence in the context of English

curriculum 2004?: Implications for EFL teacher education. TEFLIN Journal, 16(1),
79�92.

Darsih, E. (2014). Indonesian Efl Teachers� Perception on the Implementation of

2013 English Curriculum. English Review: Journal of English Education, 2(2), 1�8.

Ilma, Z., & Pratama, R. K. (2015). Transformation in Indonesian Language and

Curriculum 2013 in Indonesia, 2013�2016.

Punia, R. S. (n.d.). To What Extent Top-down or Centralised Initiatives will be

successful to determine the Nature of Teaching , Curriculum and Assessment??
Curriculum Development as an Integrated System of Planned Curriculum , Teaching ,
and Assessment, 1�20.

Choi, Y. H. (2008). Education in Asia (Vol. 5)

Prihantoro, C. R (2015). The perspective of curriculum in Indonesia on

environmental education, 4(1), 77�83.

Senel, M. (2012). Oral communication anxiety and problems of Turkish EFL learners
at Samsun 19 Mayis University, ELT department. Frontiers of Language and Teaching,
3, 49�58.

Febriyanti, E. R. (2011). Teaching speaking of English as a foreign language:

problems and solutions. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya., 1(2), 133�146.
Munjayanah. (2004). The Implementation of Communicative Language. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara.

Astuti, R.N. (2017)EFLstudents; problems and solution in learning speaking skill at

ESP. university of muhammadiyah malang.

Hosni, S.A. (2014) Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young EFL Learners.

International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL) Volume
2, Issue 6, June2014, PP 22-30 ISSN 2347-3126 (Print) & ISSN 2347-3134

He, Summer X & Chen, Amanda J.Y, (2010), How to Improve Spoken English.
[Online]Available:http://sites.google.com/site/languagejournal/Home/how-to-improve
spoken English (February 19, 2010)

Rabab�ah,G. (2015). Communication problems facing Arab learners of English. Journal

of Language and Learning, 3(1),ISSN 1740-4983.

Tuty.(2013). Pengaruh Lingkungan terhadap Kemampuan Bahasa Inggris. Universitas

Mataram.

Dunbar,C. (2004), Best Practices In Classroom Management College of Education;

Michigan State University.

Matsuda, S. & Gobel, P. (2004). Anxiety and predictors of performance in the

foreign language classroom. System, 32 (1), 21-36.

Hamad, M. M. (2013). Factors negatively affecting speaking skills at Saudi colleges

for girls in the south. English Language Teaching, 6(12), 87�97.

Kayi, H.(2006). �Teaching Speaking: Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second

Language.� The Internet TESL Journal, 12.11. EBSCOhost.

Garg, S., & Gautam, A. (2015). Learning English can change your life for the
better. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities,
III(II).

Harmer, J.(2003). How to Teach English: An Introduction to the Practice of Language

Teaching: How to Describe Learning and Teaching. London: Longman Group UK Limited
Print.

Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational

policies and practices in the Asia- Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-
613.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An

anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zacharias, N. T. (2003). A survey of tertiary teachers` beliefs about English

language teaching in Indonesia with regard to the role of English as a global
language. Unpublished MA Thesis, Thailand University, (August), 126.

Coleman, H. (2008, April). In-service teacher certification: The case of Indonesia.

Paper presented at the British Council, ITB Bandung, University of Leeds 7th
International Conference 2008: Teachers' Competencies and Qualifications for ELT in
Indonesia, ITB Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Huda, N. (2000). Kedudukan dan fungsi bahasa asing (The Position and Function of
Foreign Languages). In H. Alwi dan D. Sugono, Politik Bahasa: Risalah Seminar
Politik Bahasa (Language Politics: Procedings of the Seminar on Language Politics),
59-78. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa dan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Jenkins, J. (2003). World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge

English Language Introductions Series. London and New York: Routledge.

Samuel Kirubahar, J & Phil, M & Ed, B & Santhi.V, Jeya & Subashini, A. (2010).
Personal and Labour Market Environment Factors in English for Employability: A Case
Study of KSA.

Focho, G.N. 2010. Language as tool for global education: Bridging the gap between
the traditional and a global curriculum. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching
3(1), 135-148.

Kirubahar, J.S., Santhi, V.J. and Subashini, A. 2010. Personal and labour market
environment factors in English for employability: A case study of KSA. Language in
India 10(4), 21-29. Available online at www.languageinindia.com

O�Day, J., Goertz, M., & Floden, R. (1995). Building capacity for education
reform. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved
from http://www2. ed.gov/pubs/CPRE/rb18/index.html.

Anfara, V. & Mertens, S. (2012). What research says: Capacity building is a key to
the
radical transformation of middle grades school. Middle School Journal:
43(3): 58-64.

Newmann, F., King, M., & Youngs, P. (2001). Professional development that addresses
school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of
Education, 108(4), 259�299.

Kyriacou, Chris. (2007). Essential Teaching Skills. Incorporates the new QTS
standards for 2007. Third Edition. Nelson Thornes Ltd Delta Place 27 Bath Road
CHELTENHAM GL53 7TH. United Kingdom.

Wragg, E. C. (2005) The Art and Science of Teaching and Learning: The Selected
Works of Ted Wragg. London: Routledge Falmer.

Warsono, D.T.A and Mujiyanto, J. (2015). The Use of Bahasa Indonesia (L1) in the
Intensive English (L2) Classroom. Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Program
Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia.

Huba, M.E., & Freed, J.E. (2000). Teacher-centered vs. learner-centered paradigms.
Retrieved from:
http://assessment.uconn.edu/docs/TeacherCenteredVsLearnerCenteredParadigms. Pdf.

Azra, A (2002). Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Nasional: Rekonstruksi dan Demokrasi.

Jakarta: Kompas.

Bjork, C. (2005). Indonesian Education: Teachers, Schools, and Central

Bureaucracy.New York and London: Routledge.
Zuhdi, M. (2015). Pedagogical Practices in Indonesia. Transforming Teaching and
Learning in Asia and the Pacific Case Studies from Seven Countries. UNESCO.
Bangkok.

Soedijarto. (2008). Landasan dan Arah Pendidikan Nasional Kita (The Basis and the
Directions of our National Education). Jakarta, Penerbit Kompas.

McCombs, B. L. & Whistler, J. S. (1997). The Learner-Centered Classroom and School.

Strategies for Increasing Student Motivation and Achievement. Sam Francisco: Jossey
Bass Publishers.

Mappiasse, S. S & Sihes , A.J.B. (2014). Evaluation of English as a Foreign

Language and Its Curriculum in Indonesia: A Review. Faculty of Education,
University of Technology Malaysia, Malaysia.

Ree,J., Muralidharan, Karthik., Pradhan, Menno, & Rogers, Halsey. (2016). Double
for Nothing? Experimental Evidence on the Impact of an Unconditional Teacher Salary
Increase on Student Performance in Indonesia. World Bank; joppederee@gmail.com.
Karthik Muralidharan: UC San Diego, NBER, BREAD, J-PAL; kamurali@ucsd.edu. Menno
Pradhan: University of Amsterdam and VU University.

Subroto, Dr. Waspodo Tjipto. (2013). Income and Implications of Teacher Performance
to Improve the Quality Of Education in the Elementary School of Surabaya. Senior
Lecturer. State University of Surabaya. International Journal of Business,
Humanities and Technology Vol. 3 No. 2; February 2013. Indonesia.

Setiawan, R. (2017). The Influence of Income, Experience, and Academic

Qualification on the Early Childhood Education Teachers� Creativity in Semarang,
Indonesia. Dr., Early Childhood Department, Institute of Education Veteran
Semarang, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction October 2017 ? Vol.10,
No.4 e-ISSN: 1308-1470 ? www.e-iji.net p-ISSN: 1694-609X pp. 39-50.

Sulisworo, D., Nasir, R., & Maryani, I. (2017). Identification of teachers�

problems in Indonesia on facing global community. International Journal of Research
Studies in Education 2017 April, Volume 6 Number 2, 81-90.

Dessler, G. (2005). Human Resource Management (10th ed.). India: Pearson Prentice
Hall.

Nadeem, M., Rana, M., Lone, A., Maqbool, S., Naz, K., & Ali, A. (2011). Teacher�s
competencies and factors affecting the performance of female teachers in bahawalpur
(southern punjab) pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science,
2(19), 1-6.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

All textbooks and, guideline are from the Ministry of Education rather than from
school and publishing companies (OECD, 2015, p.269).

focus on everyone in the class and it might cause slow development of English
communication in this country.

Several researches showed that. Environment in Indonesia provides less support or

exposure for the learners to communicate, because English
is not spoken in the community. Because of less explanation about target language
and less interaction with the native speakers, adult EFL learners in general are
relatively far from being proficient English users. .
Indonesians students are using English only in the classrooms even with minimum
opportunity..Several ways have been done to improve students' English proficiency,
the results not be too significant, because the courage in speak English are still
low. They feel afraid if they are making mistakes or in the pronunciation used of
the word. The students� just courage to use English language when they are in the
classroom, most of them choose to silent compare using English language to
communication.
Indonesian environment does not support the students to speak English frequently
outside the class.
In the environment itself most of the students when speaking their english in to
show off the ingenuity of english. students also feel tough in speaking English
speaking because they do not have the other person in terms of communication. In
the classroom there is also an atmosphere that makes them unable to speak English.
when in teaching teachers who manage the class can not handle the students. when
the teacher explains about the material in the classroom students may be more
easily understand and there are less understand with the material taught by the
teacher. why, because in the classroom atmosphere with a greater number of students
this makes the teacher difficult in manage the classroom. students who may sit at
the front can easily understand the lesson then the students who sit at the back
still do not understand or they ask to repeat the material taught by the teacher
(Hosni, 2014).