Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jean-luc Demonsant
1. We will indeed focus on father to son relationship as 2. In fat this was the case anywhere, when no reliable
Haalpulaar is a patrilineal society. pension sytems exited.
and market imbalances. Often the fa- a ield tudy in Senegal carried out
mily pay’s the emigrant’s travel expenses between 2001 and 2004.
in exchange for remittances from wages he paper is divided into four sec-
earned. his has been well documented tions. he irt setion begins by descri-
in theoretical and empirical literature on bing the economic and cultural context
the economics of migration and remit- of the ieldwork, that is, the Haalpulaa-
tances1. ren of the Senegal River middle valley.
Yet there remains an unsolved ratio- he second setion presents the theoreti-
nality problem: while the gains are ob- cal framework placing the role of family
vious from the family viewpoint, they are pretige as a central enforcement device
less clear from the migrant’s perspetive. for the old-age support arrangements.
hat is, why wouldn’t a migrant son sim- he third setion exposes the empirical
ply renege on his obligations to his fami- trategy - from the data colletion pro-
ly? he quetion becomes more relevant cess to the econometric speciication -
when accounting for the motivations of developed to highlight the relevance of
a young migrant providing support to this hypothesis. After presenting the
his elderly parents, since they are unli- results of the household survey, along
kely to be in a position to assit him in with additional qualitative evidence
return as the mutual insurance contrat that support this scenario, some policy
tipulates, in case of unemployment implications on migration and develop-
for intance. One explanation is what ment are highlighted.
Bernheim, et al (1985) term the ‘Strate-
gic Bequet Motive’ in which children
compete for parents’ inheritance. In this II. BACKGROUND : M ATAM AND THE
view, parents can threaten their children H AALPULAAR SOCIETY
not to bequeath them anything if they
have not been supportive. Accordingly, Contraints from the physical envi-
young children remit to secure their ronment on the one hand and the cultu-
bequet. A number of tudies support ral context of the area on the other hand
the trategic bequet motive. In Bots- give little credit to the ‘trategic bequet
wana, Lucas and Stark (1985) found that motive’ thesis. In the Senegal middle
families who own more cattle receive valley migration has long been conside-
more remittances than those who do red a better trategy than working in the
not. Hoddinott (1992) teted this model local agriculture setor. In this context,
on rural Kenyan data, and found remit- the returns to ‘physical’ bequets have
tances responsive to bequeathable lands. become close to insigniicant for a mi-
What happens, then, in a changing grant son.
rural society when land or cattle owner- Less than a century ago, the middle
ship are no longer sought after? What valley was relatively prosperous and the-
other variables come into play? I address refore economically attrative. he keys
these quetions through indings from to success were the navigability of the
river, the cattle breeding, and ishing
ativities along with the exitence of
1. See Docquier and Rapoport (2006) for a recent review. two harvet seasons in Otober and
is rather controversial, as it usually refers life, as there is a set of implicit rules that
to the diferent artisan social sub-cate- each group mut follow, driven by ‘the
gories: les catés in French. In this paper, sense of honour’ that is speciic to the
‘the cate sytem’ refers to the whole tra- nobles. here are many ways for higher
tiied social organization. It is clear that tatus individuals to ditinguish them-
all these social categories were not ixed, selves from lower tatus ones3. At the
but that they evolved as some commo- core of the noble’s code of honour is
ners have trategically been conferred a the importance of always being in the
title of nobility as a reward for good ser- position of giving and never asking. It
vices, or new warriors recruited among is by giving and being publicly generous
former slaves1. It is important to note that the noble will be able to demons-
that these categories corresponded to a trate his worthiness. When belonging to
genuine need for a speciic job allocation such families it is an unbearable shame
during the former era. he oicial aboli- to have economic diiculties. here are
tion of slavery along with the emergence great pressures to display generous beha-
of the modern market economy render viour. Maintaining a high social tatus
this classiication outdated on prati- is expensive as it means giving to their
cal grounds. Likewise, artisans do not griots and many clients (that is, their
necessarily work in the branch of their former slaves and artisans). he size of
group’s specialization, though both the the clientele represents the power of the
artisans and the descendants of slaves family. Along with the warm glow efet
till sufer from discrimination nowa- of giving, griots diretly raise the utility
days. hey mainly consit of marriage of the giver by advertising his generosity,
contraints, as well as denied access to which diretly improves his reputation 4.
land, and to political and religious lea- Aritocratic families till ought to give
dership2. Indeed at the political level, if to their former clientele during baptisms,
the adminitrative sytem is absolutely weddings and religious events.
similar to the French one, villages have
remained in the hands of the traditional
chiefs. It is really triking how relevant III. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: ‘ THE
this classiication remains in contempo- SYMBOLIC BAR AKA MOTIVE’
rary Haalpulaar culture.
In this traditional view, your birth In a tratiied society ruled as a ge-
determines your personality (cf., Wane rontocracy, an old man may beneit from
1969 who depits each cate with a spe- an advantageous position in local poli-
ciic personal trait). It is said for intance tics if and only if he belongs to a high-
that you should not trut an artisan be-
cause he may jut be trying to seduce you 3. Bodily poture, where one sits and how one addresses
others in public meetings are manners of displaying
in order to receive gifts. he role played one’s rank. Typically, although not speciic to Haalpu-
by this cate sytem appears in everyday laar society, lengthy traditional greetings are relevant
to the social tatus of protagonits. One aspet is the
1. he well-documented hitorical novel Les Peuls by repetition of the family name, which is called ‘yetode’
Tierno Monénembo perfetly illutrates how mobile in Pulaar and literally means ‘the name that honours’.
these social categories were over generations. 4. See Azam (1995) for an intereting economic interpre-
2. See for intance Sy (2002). tation of such norm.
ranked family. Few families have a say in ted as Allah’s blessing, and it has trong
choosing the village leader, and even less inluence throughout the whole Islamic
have a chance to become one. Hence, the world. It is important to bear in mind
family name becomes a valuable sym- that it is trongly linked to good luck,
bolic bequet for such important fami- wealth, happiness, health, fertility, and
lies. At the same time, it is well known social success. Baraka can be acquired
that, many former slaves, or bards take hereditarily through genealogical link
advantage of their position too, and to saints, or their contats (see Schmitz,
like to remind their former maters of 2000), but also by a trit observance of
their duty to provide them with gifts. the ive pillars of Islam. It can be trans-
hus, respeting this social pressure to mitted by blessings. Being old and a
generously give to anyone requires high well-known good Muslim puts oneself
income. Migration appears as a solution in a good position to have some.
to inance these conspicuous expenses. Since living abroad makes it impos-
In focus group discussions and indi- sible to be physically near one’s dying
vidual interviews in both Senegal and parents, sending money appears as one
the diaspora, the researcher was repea- pratical alternative. Of course, the
tedly told that a very trong motivation value of this Baraka in the eyes of the
for remitting is to earn blessings and migrant trongly depends on the nota-
prayers for felicity. Here religion and bility of his patriarch and consequently
traditional beliefs interfere. Indeed on the tatus of the family. Obviously
there are some mytical pratices in belonging to a pretigious family yields
Haalpulaar, Wolof and Serer tradi- considerable returns in terms of pros-
tions, consiting in calling the migrant pets for marriage and political position
to come back home (Sylla & M’Baye, back in the village. While abroad or in
1991). here are legends about migrants the capital city, he could also beneit
coming back home in a rush and losing from the tatus of the family to rely on
memory of how this happened and then migrants from the same village. Besides,
going insane. his is said to be adapted migrants from the same village usually
as a lat resort, as retaliation for an unre- live in neighbouring rooms in workers’
liable son. Repeatedly the importance of hotels - foyers de travailleurs in French -
being near your dying parents as they recontituting the village society. It has
will transmit the Baraka of the whole been repeatedly suggeted that this is
dynaty through their lat blessing was a way of reproducing hierarchic village
raised1. Indeed a dying old man will society (for example, see Ba, 1996: 207).
call his beloved sons, and give them his In other geographic areas, Whitehouse
inal blessing: the duhahu - in Pulaar - (1994) describes Baraka as one motive
which transmits barka - in Pulaar. his for returning migrants among Soninke
Islamic word could roughly be transla- in Mali. Again, remitting can be a way
for the migrant to pay tribute to the vil-
1. he importance of the parent’s lat blessing is not lage tratiied sociopolitical truture.
speciic to Islam, though. It is mentioned in many parts Other scholars have long remarked
of the Bible, and particularly in the Genesis. hink of
Jacob’s tory: he valued so much his father’s blessing that on the important role that social repu-
he managed to get blessed intead of his brother Esaü. tation plays in the migrant contrat to
his family. Lucas and Stark (1985) reco- promising sons abroad (or to the capi-
gnized that the migrant may remit ‘to tal city), expeting them to remit. he
enhance pretige or political inluence’ motivation of migrant sons is to obtain
for the days when he will return. Taking the father’s position on their return. In
good care of one’s parents is a hallmark this view, remittances should be obser-
of reliability. his could, for example, ved for high-ranked migrants only. he
be an incentive for migrants seeking migration of the lower-tatus migrants
wives within the community. he loss relates to other motivations: trading
of pretige incurred by defaulting sons monetary gifts for social mobility. hey
could also prevent their return for retire- will loosen ties with their community,
ment, which is central to many African and make their new life abroad or in the
migrants. Lat but not leat, the desire capital, taking advantage of the anony-
to be buried at home is an additional mity of city life.
motive to maintain the social tatus of
the family. It is essential for many Mus-
lim migrants, and in particular those IV. THE DATA COLLECTION AND
from the Senegal River Valley. Many DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
migrants associations were indeed crea-
ted in order to collet money for the he ieldwork followed a mixed
repatriation of dead bodies1. methods projet as advocated by Chris-
his theoretical framework empha- topher Udry2: confronting economic
sizes the role of social tatus in enforcing theory with other social sciences and
the contrat between father and migrant diret observations from repeated ield-
sons. Within the Haalpulaar family works in Senegal and among Senegalese
the patriarch is the decision maker. At immigrants in France. Since the irt
the village level, there are two groups ield trip in rural Senegal, the resear-
of families: the nobles and the others cher had the opportunity to witness the
(non-nobles). Only the patriarchs from inluence that the former cate sytem
noble families can accede to inluential till has in the decision-making process
positions. To deserve their advantageous of any villager in both public and private
dominant position, the nobles mut pay spheres. However, economic tudies in
non-nobles subtantial gifts in monetary Africa have usually put the emphasis on
terms. he non-nobles who beneit from ethnic diversity, rarely incorporating so-
these transfers mut in return renounce cial divisions within ethnic groups (with
basic human rights: not choose a spouse the notable exceptions of Gubert, 2000;
among the nobles, give up their politi- Azam and Gubert, 2005). Control over
cal ambitions, and admit the superiority the entire data colletion process (inclu-
of the nobles in community decision ding seletion of interviewers) provides
making. here is an implicit family precise knowledge of the reliability of
contrat between the patriarch and his such sensitive variables as cate tatus.
adult sons. he patriarch sends his mot
1. See Petit (2002) regarding this pratice in Marseille, 2. Talk downloaded from his personal webpage : http://
France. www.econ.yale.edu/~cru2/pdf/conversations.pdf
he survey 1 was conduted jut be- red such as which cate it belongs
fore the rainy season (from April to June to, the family tenure in the village,
2004), a time of drought and food scar- the political and religious role played
city. he good thing is that since pea- by the patriarch and his father. hen
sants are preparing the ields for the rain much emphasis was put on where the
cultivations, all members of the house- patriarch gets support from, but also
hold who are away, but within reach, on his wealth (housing, ields, cattle,
come back to give a hand. belongings and so forth), health,
he survey covered 149 patriarchs nutrition, education, pat migrations
over six villages randomly chosen and economic ativities.
around Matam2. hree were located by • he household level: a ‘household’
the Senegal river, in the so-called waalo is deined as a unit of consumption
region, the other three were located and income sharing (as sometimes
approximately 10 km from the river, in several households can co-reside in
the jeeri region, one of them being right the same compound), which can be
by the highway (the others being 4km made of several nuclear family units3.
away on a dirt track). Waalo villages Very precise family links between
were isolated (at leat) 3 months a year household members were colleted,
during the rainy season as roads become and some basic information on each
unit for vehicles, which can only be one, such as education level, econo-
reached by pirogues (2-3 hour intead mic ativity, sources of revenue.
of 20 minute ride during the dry sea- • Finally, information on each child
son). Jeeri villagers do not own irrigated has been colleted. Special attention
lands, which are located near the river, was given to children living outside
but some noble families do own waalo the household, for which indiret in-
lands by the river. formation through spouses, mother,
All men in the seleted villages who siblings, or the father was gathered.
met the tudy criteria were seleted. he main focus was on remittances
he criteria are that they mut be born sent by migrant sons to their old
before 1939, and that their eldet living father, and the ret of the family. In-
son should have been born before 1979. formation on news and visits given to
Information was gathered at three levels: the family were also colleted.
• he patriarch level: Information on
both his social tatus and his living Eforts were made to ensure that
conditions were gathered. To mea- data colleted were of high quality. For
sure social tatus, information on double checking purposes, the tatus of
the family background was gathe- the family was gathered twice. Firt, the
information was obtained diretly by as-
1. he author is grateful to Ousmane Ba, Moussa Ly,
king the patriarch, then indiretly, on a
Abou Sow, Abou hiam and Hamath hiam for doing a second round, asking informants (main-
great job in data colletion and providing assitance with ly the village chief). As it can be a very
the survey design.
sensitive subjet, the following quetion
2. Jeeri villages are: hiambe, Galoyabe Toucouleur,
Hombo. Waalo villages are: Bow, hiemping and hial-
ly Souballo. 3. he Pulaar word is foyre (plural: poye).
TABLE 1
caste composition of samples of interest
was asked towards the end of the survey, As mentioned earlier, the larget
in order to prevent the patriarch from cate is the ‘free men’ category, which
being ofended or upset, or even from encompasses aritocrats as well as com-
refusing to be surveyed: moners. To diferentiate them, the lit of
Quelle et l’ «origine sociale» de votre dignitaries - deined as the members of
famille? (in English: What is the “social the conseil des sages representing the advi-
origin” of your family) sory board of the village chief - was col-
his quetion was asked among a leted from our informants. It appeared
series of quetions on hitorical back- that barely 40 per cent of the patriarchs
ground of the family. For the same rea- were designed as ‘dignitaries’1. hey
sons, we asked the village chief about represent the atual and only decision
the tatus of the surveyed families only makers in the village.
on a second round in September. Concerning migrants’ detinations,
A detailed table of descriptive tatis- the ditribution is very similar to pre-
tics for the initial sample, the migrants vious tudies of Haalpulaar migration:
and the remitters is shown in Table A.2 mainly dometic, the international
in the appendix. migration is mainly African, and very
Only the sons of the patriarchs above few have left the continent. Forty-four
16 years old were considered as potential per cent of all migration is dometic, or
old-age support providers. here are 470 migration to the neighbouring countries,
adult sons in the initial sample. Forty- that is, Mauritania, Mali, Gambia and
ive per cent have migrated. Among the Guinea. Dakar concentrates 77 per cent
migrants, 62 per cent regularly remit. It of these ‘dometic’ (Senegal or neigh-
is noteworthy that only 66 per cent of bouring countries) detinations. Howe-
the migrants belong to ‘free men’ fami- ver, the capital city is often a temporary
lies, whereas they represent 71 per cent top on the way to further detinations.
of the remitters. he diference is even hirty-eight per cent of migrants went to
more notable for dignitaries. Table 1 dis-
plays the cate composition of the dif- 1. Very few artisans and slaves may be dignitaries too:
ferent samples tudied: they are former clients of mot pretigious families.
another African country. Mot of Afri- network. his is rather diicult to ind
can migration (73%) is direted towards out from the data at hand. At the same
Central Africa: Gabon, Congo, and time, a recent popular saying circulates
Cameroon. here is a long tradition of in the villages: ‘Migrations are blind to
Senegal River valley migration in this cates’. Indeed, among migrants out-
area. here are accounts of diamantaire side the continent (mainly Europe-US),
who made quite a good fortune in these where expeted earnings are higher, the
countries1. Côte d’Ivoire has also been a proportion of non-dignitaries is greater
frequent detination of choice, but since than that of dignitaries (there 58% non-
2000 because of the political intabi- dignitaries in Europe vs. 51% in Senegal
lity and xenophobic pratices many have and 47% in the ret of Africa), and yet
led. In the end, only 18 per cent of the the proportion of dignitaries is higher
migrants left the African continent (they than non-dignitaries to regularly remit
represent 39 migrants): not surprisingly, (among migrant sons, 75% of dignitaries
mot went to France (26 migrants). he remit vs. 50% non dignitaries).
United States is the second detination he descriptive tatitics evidence
(9 migrants) a few migrants being in found in the previous setion needs to be
Spain or Italy (5). he United States is an checked ‘all things being equal’. Hence,
increasingly attrative detination, but let us now turn to the regression results.
many can’t aford the cot of travel and Since only those who have migrated
the social networks are not in place in can make transfers, a two-tep Heck-
the United States to ease the cots of mi- man model generalised for probit mo-
gration. During the ield invetigations, dels was used to take into account the
I met returning or visiting migrants from seletion bias2. he quetion is: do the
Germany and Denmark, and also surpri- ones with a higher probability of having
singly ditant detinations like Autra- migrated have a higher or lower proba-
lia and even China. Even if this is not bility of remitting? As pointed out in
tatitically signiicant, it indicates that the appendix Table A-3, no such efets
diversiication of detinations is used to are found: both decisions to migrate and
circumvent tough migration policies. then to remit are not correlated, which
It is important to bear in mind that implies that these two regressions can
information about migrants is only se- be tudied separately.
cond hand. he bet information about Furthermore, since there are migrants
them was assumed to be from the mother from the same families (up to 7 brothers),
or the wife of the migrant. he brothers the correlation within the family was
and the father were also asked if neces- accounted for using a robut etimator of
sary. As a consequence, one common tandard errors with family cluters.
criticism of the indings is that low rank Regressions with diferent model
migrants are simply not in a position to speciications are displayed to show the
remit as they could not beneit from the robutness of the results, putting much
Migration 1 2 3 4
(adult son)
Age 0.065 0.073 0.074 0.072
(2.94)*** (3.69)*** (3.61)*** (3.54)***
(age)² -0.001 -0.001 -0.001 -0.001
(-2.51)** (-2.98)*** (-2.97)*** (-2.90)***
(0.32)
=1 if has ever been to formal school -0.033
(0.48)
# of brothers who have migrated -0.03
(-1.04)
(patriarch)
Age 0.009 0.006 0.005 0.006
(1.23) (1.14) (0.9) (1.16)
=1 if landless -0.118
(-1.02)
88 Robust z statistics
DOUNIA in,parentheses;
revue d'intelligence
* signiicant atstratégique et des
10%; ** signiicant relations
at 5%; internationales
*** signiicant at 1%
Note: villages dummies are included in the regression, but not displayed (non signiicant)
Old-Age Security in Rural Senegal: The symbolic Baraka motive
efort on the speciication of the family will ind in migration. One mut keep
social tatus and (proxies for) wealth. in mind that mot migrants work in the
informal setor, in Dakar and elsewhere
in Africa, and in unskilled jobs in indus-
V. R ESULTS ON MIGRATING AND trialised countries (mainly in the hotel
R EMITTING BEHAVIOURS or catering trades).
Variables capturing wealth of the fa-
Several model speciications are dis- mily all seem to be not signiicant except
played in table 2: the irt two columns for two. Firt, the fat of owning cattle
aim at identifying the relevant wealth increases the chance of having migra-
variables, while the lat ones identify the ted. Second, the fat that his father spent
social tatus efet. many years abroad (or in the capital city)
In the lat column, only signiicant increases the chance of the son migra-
variables are kept in order to avoid mul- ting. here are two intertwined positive
ticolinearity problems. he main results efets: a wealth and a network efet. All
are consitent throughout diferent mo- migrations are cotly but especially for
del speciications. ditant detinations: fares, bribing to get
Overall this model corretly predits documents, or to get across the border
74 per cent of migrating behaviour. In safely. It usually represents far more than
contrat to previous tudies, the number what a basic rural household can aford.
of migrating brothers appears not to be hen there are some high cots of accom-
signiicant. In reality, there are two op- modation: even in Dakar renting a room
posite efets: a network and a saturation has become very expensive. Of patriarchs
efet. Having a brother can facilitate who have migrated around 55 per cent
migration: older brothers can inance receive a pension. However, patriarchs
their cadets, creating shifts of migrants1. who did not get a formal job usually ma-
On the other hand, when there are naged to invet in produtive ativities
already migrants in the family, the pa- inancing their own sons’ migration and
triarch may require other sons to tay to settlement. Consequently, it appears that
help him manage the household. Here it sons of economically better-of families
seems that both efets are neutralised. have a higher chance of migrating. here
he age of the father has no signii- are also network efets. Fathers who
cant efet, but the older the son is, the have migrated have been able to build
higher the probability of having migra- networks abroad and ease the labour
ted, though with a decreasing efet, as market entry of their sons. Many of those
the signiicantly negative squared age in earlier migrant treams worked in the
variable indicates. hotel trade in Dakar or as a houseboy or
he fat that having attended formal cook for French colonisers who then took
schooling is not signiicant is relevant them to France to work for them.
to the fat that migrants do not need Finally, sons of families belonging
to hold literacy skills for the job they to the higher cates are less inclined to
migrate than those of lower cates. his
1. In French this is called ‘noria’ (see Ba 1996: 30). his
can no longer hold for detinations that have become result contradits Azam and Gubert’s
very diicult to reach such as Europe. (2005) indings among Soninke: they
found that aritocrats are more likely to icant efet on the remitting behaviour.
migrate than those of lower social rank. More surprising till, the number of years
It is necessary to turn to migrant remit- of completed formal schooling decreases
ting behaviour to undertand if migrants the probability of remitting. his is not
from high and low tatus have the same due to sons tudying abroad, as only se-
behaviour once in migration. ven migrants are atually inishing their
Among the migrants, let us turn now tudies, which represents less than three
to their probability of frequently remit- per cent of migrants. As shown in the
ting. his model has a good preditive appendix Table A-2, the average years of
power as overall nearly 77 per cent of mi- schooling is very low: around two. But
grants are properly predited to remit or till, few years of formal schooling could
not. Table 2 displays ive diferent model be enough to acquire such basic skills as
speciications. reading and writing, and lead to better
Firt, the age of the migrant appears job opportunity. his could in turn give
not to be signiicant for his remitting the migrant more incentive to settle in
behaviour. More surprisingly, the size of the hot detination, and cut ties with
the patriarchal household has no impat the hierarchical village society.
on his probability of remitting. Finally, central to the main point of
Some expeted ‘wealth efets’ are this article: belonging to a politically
found: data on the migrant’s earnings powerful family in the village makes the
were not available, but there are some migrant more likely to remit than belon-
proxies. he migration length appears to ging to a lower cate. Indeed, this tatus
be signiicantly positive, which relets dummy variable is trongly signiicant at
the idea that it usually takes time for a the 1 per cent level. Here what seems to
migrant to obtain a table job and regu- be central is the fat that the patriarch
lar wages. Similarly, living in a deve- plays a signiicant role in the village
loped country positively afets his pro- belonging to the circle of inluential di-
bability of remitting. his is obviously gnitaries. Indeed, belonging to the free
linked to the higher earnings available men category is not precise enough, as
there: he earns more than his own living this is a heterogeneous category. For ins-
expenses and can accordingly send back tance, newly arrived free men families
a part of his earning. may not have regained a dominant posi-
Naturally, having a spouse who re- tion in the village1. On the contrary, a
mained in the household of the father few families from the artisans or former
increases signiicantly the probability of slaves groups may have acquired a poli-
remitting. tical position being linked with a very
When turning to the trategic pretigious family as mentioned earlier.
bequet motive, results similar to Hod- Unfortunately the lack of social ta-
dinott (1992) are found: if the father tus variables in other quantitative sur-
owns land, it increases the probability of veys makes it impossible to compare
remitting.
Surprisingly, no monitoring efets 1. It is the case of many Mauritanian refugees (from the
1989 unret) who despite being Fulbe have rarely gained
are found here: having brothers living in a position as dignitary in their new Senegalese settle-
the same place of migration has no signi- ment.
TABLE 3
Remitting 1 2 3 4 5
(adult son)
Ages -0.004 -0.003 -0.004 -0.005 -0.005
(0.55) (0.55) (0.59) (0.71) (0.81)
this result with other tudies so far. As gins. hey seem to be the produt of this
a complement to the empirical evidence melting pot.
there are some other qualitative pieces In previous tudies on migration
of evidence that conirm the hypothesis among the Haalpulaaren it has been
made in this paper: some are lited here.1 mentioned that the desire to escape
To gain respetability in the village from rigid social contraints was among
the mot eicient way is to contribute to the main motives for migration. As they
the building of a mosque. here are seve- usually refer to the position of younger
ral anecdotes the researcher heard during brothers seeking to escape the tyranny
my tay in the valley, about the boycott of older brothers, it could easily be ex-
of mosques built by migrant slaves. he tended to lower tatus migrants. he tu-
Imam who is necessarily a noble, simply dy of Delaunay (1984) goes in the same
refused to lead the prayers. he resear- diretion as these results. He inds that
cher heard a similar tory about a well any type of cate can be found among
built by a successful slave that the nobles the migrants from the Senegal Valley,
boycotted, opting for the more ditant but recognises that the former slaves are
well. hese anecdotes show that it is more likely to settle deinitively, whereas
rather ineicient for a slave to invet in the nobles would rather migrate tempo-
order to raise his respetability in the rarily and send remittances while away,
village: he will always be considered as and then eventually return to the village.
a slave and accordingly will be reminded
to keep his low-proile rank. he only
way to get rid of these social tigmas is to VI. CONCLUDING R EMARKS
migrate. In anonymous cities or foreign
countries, he will more easily merge into hese indings sugget that migration
society and be free in his ats. is available to any social category, but for
It is noticeable that during my repea- diferent aims: it can either be seen as an
ted visits at diferent workers’ hotels, I individual decision to escape from a poor
met very few descendants of slaves or social position with dire prospets in the
artisans2. his is consitent, with repor- village or, conversely, as a family decision
ted cases of continuing discrimination to maintain its dominant local position.
againt slaves even abroad within com- As a consequence, it is obvious that the
munities of same village of origin. he irt type of migrants will not be in-
pattern is that slaves are excluded from tereted in inveting in the development
any decision making position in the mi- of the village but will beneit from the ur-
grants’ association. Ba (1996: 238) reports ban melting pot to get rid of their social
such a case in Cameroon. tigmas. he good side of this is that they
In Dakar, many people with Haal- are fators of change as they move from a
pulaaren names who do not speak Pu- network-based to a modern market eco-
laar happen to be of slave or artisan ori- nomy. hese results are very similar to
those of Luke and Munshi (2011), who
1. And others (in French) in Demonsant (2007).
found that the mot discriminated group,
2. Except the descendants of slaves of the village chief ’s
family, which would tend to prove that former slaves of that is women from hitorically disadvan-
important families have some kind of respetability too. taged cates, seek to migrate and mingle
in the modern economy weakening fami- his tudy also has methodological
lies’ ties to the ancetral community and implications. he aim of this tudy was
the traditional economy. In order to pre- primarily to draw attention to the local
vent rural exodus and urban concentra- intitutions when trying to undertand
tions, an eicient policy would then be to migration in a non-Wetern environ-
invet in intensive consciousness-raising ment. Economits and econometricians
campaigns to get rid of the obsolete cate too often draw conclusions from sur-
sytem. his will probably take time and veys that were lacking social context.
be hard to implement as I found out that As this was a limited tudy, it would be
the cate issue was till a highly taboo intereting to pursue on a broader range.
subjet in contemporary Senegal. Unfortunately it is a rather delicate task
Central to political debates in France, to gather information on such sensitive
republican values of racial integration information as cate origin and hence it
and assimilation may diferently appeal is rather diicult to condut similar sur-
to both types of migrants previously veys at a larger scale. But to the bet of
described. France’s model of integration my knowledge, the work of Flore Gubert
aims to assimilate immigrants by intil- among Soninke of Mali (Gubert, 2000;
ling French cultural values. As a result, Azam and Gubert, 2005) and this one are
keeping trong ties with the country of the only quantitative attempts to show
origin is not well received. According to the contemporary impat of the Wet
the results found here, any attempt to African cate sytem. Migration is an
assimilate the migrants of noble origins interdisciplinary subjet and social scien-
will fail. Indeed, they see themselves tits could beneit from the methodolo-
as temporary migrants and have sound gical trengths of each discipline. his
plans to return to the village. When tudy supports the World Bank (2006)
returning they will genuinely keep silent publication, which recognises that grea-
their shameful subordinate occupations1 ter co-operation between economits,
while abroad and turn into powerful and and socio-anthropologits allow a more
well respeted dignitaries. Alternatively, subtle analysis. While the socio-an-
the migrants from lower social catego- thropologits can help identify the me-
ries will display trong motivations to it chanisms through which development
in the hot society, and would probably occurs, the economits can quantify the
be more likely to marry outside their phenomenon under tudy. Unfortunately
community and adopt more quickly the limitation of this tudy is the dii-
local cutoms and language. Unfortuna- culty or maybe even the impossibility to
tely I don’t know of any dataset which collet sensitive information (the hito-
would allow me to tet it2. rical cate ailiation) on a larger scale.
However this irt tep in this diretion
1. I can conirm that it is absolutely taboo to ask a vi-
is an invitation to continue exploring the
siting migrant about his job in the hot country (or in the interplay between the cate sytem and
capital city). As one might guess such work was not pres- contemporary migrations.
tigious, it is generally accepted to keep it silent... or to
tell it only to a total foreigner away from other villagers!
2. his would require data on the cate origin of Haalpu- origin is prohibited by law access to cate origin is even
laar immigrants. Concerning France as data on ethnic harder to get...
A PPENDIX
1. Yaya Wane voluntarily excluded the tock breeders (in Pulaar: Pullo) from the Haalpulaar cate sytem.
Rimbe ardiibe
Toorobe Lawakoobe or ileteebe Temporal power
(free)
DOUNIA, revue d'intelligence stratégique et des relations internationales
TABLE A-1 The Haalpulaar complex caste system (translated from Wane, 1969: 33)1
Miiskineebe Free men, farmers: demoowo
Worgankoobe Former monarchs: farba ceddo
Rimbe (free Kolyaabe Koly’s soldiers : jagaraf
men)
Sebe Mbonaabe
Rimbe huunybe
Awgalnaabe Local variants of kolyaabe
(courtiers)
Helgalagel, and so forth
Jaawambe Courtiers and advisers: sooma
Subalbe Fishermen: jaaltaabe
Maabube sanyoobe Weavers: jarno
Baleebe Blacksmiths: farba baylo
Waylibe
Sayakoobe Jewelers: farba baylo
Alawbe Shoemakers: foosiri
Fecciram golle (artisans) Sakebe
Wodeebe or garankoobe Cobblers
Laade Pirogue builders: kalmbaan
Nyenbe Laobe
(artisans Worworbe (bobi) Kitchen tools’ makers: maalaw
and ‘griots’) Buurnaabe Potters and ceramicists
Wambaabe Traditional guitar players
‘Griots’: Naalankoobe Maabube suudu Paate
(entertainers) or
Maabube jaawambe Singers
nyaagotoobe (praise
singers) Laobe gumbala (kontimpaaji)
Aolube Griots genealogists : farba gawlo
Jyaabe Soottiibe (freed slaves) Maccube Free but servile
(slaves) Halfaabe (dependants) Maccube Slaves and servants: jagodiin
95 Numéro 7 – Décembre 2013
T T T
# # # Y
G V
R I R
H B L F M F t t M F B H
o o
o o
o n o
o
n n
e
e e o o o
n n n
b
o e
A
e v
e e t
e
o
n
n
n
e e
e
n n
o o t A n
n
t
t
o
n
o
t t
t
o o
n
n n
t
n
o o
o o o
o o n t t
t o
e
e
n
t t t
A
t
o
o
n M
n
n
o
t n
o
o
n
o
t
o
e
n
o
n
t
o
v
t t
t
o
A A n
t t
n
n n
t
e
v
o
o
o
o o
v
n
n n
t t
o
t
e
n
n
t o
A
o
n v
t
o
t
t
o
n
n
t
n
.
. a a
3 a
6 6 3 a
6
S
S t
S S
S 6 S
S
6
6 3
I
45%
M
3
6
S
S S
S S
S
t
n
S
3 6
6
a
S
6
a
6 6
.
a
6
. a a
6
3 3
. 3 3
. 6
6
S
S S t
S S S
S
S S S
3
S S
a
S
62%
n
M
3 3
6 3
.
S S
S S S
S S S
S S S
n
S a
. .
a
a
6
a
a
6
a
3 .
6
3
6 6
6
.
a a
. .
. 6 a
6
a
6
3
6 . a a
. 6 6
6 6 6
S
S S S
S t
S S
S 3 S
S 6
S S
a 3
.
.
M
3 6 . 3 3
.
n
S S
S S S S S S t
S S S
S
3 6
6
. t
a
3
a
a
3
.
6
3
. .
6
.
Descriptive statistics for the initial sample, the migrants and the remitters
TABLE A-2
TABLE A-3
Probability of remitting conditional on having migrated: “Heckit” regression results
(adult son)
Age -0.008
(1.31)
=1 if has ever been to formal school -0.185
(1.93)*
Migration length (years) 0.018
(1.94)*
=1 if lives outside the African continent 0.342
(3.42)***
=1 if one spouse lives with the patriarch 0.177
(2.02)**
(patriarch)
Age 0.016
(2.01)**
=1 if landless -0.278
(1.96)*
=1 if belongs to Family of higher caste 0.256
(2.85)***
Rho -0.282
af