SOVEREIGN LAW

FOR INDIVIDUALS
EXPLAINED

Kia ora

Hello & welcome

ONLY LIVING-SOULS CAN

GENERATE THE ENERGY
REQUIRED TO CREATE
AND PRODUCE ANYTHING

ARTIFICIAL-LEGAL-ENTITIES
ARE IMAGINARY AND
WITHOUT SUBSTANCE

John Ake

During the first half of 2005 I was in New Zealand and lectured on
“sovereign law”. It has generated much interest and as a result I’ve
decided to post this essay in response to the many questions that have
been raised.

It remains for you to join the dots.

DISCLAIMER

I feel obliged to point out that I am not a practising or licenced legal

counsel. This document is only my opinion, not advice and offers no
guarantees or magical cures. I do however, encourage you in your
search for true freedom, knowledge and understanding.

“and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free”.
John 8 :32

1
 ANECDOTE : HOW DO WE MEASURE VALUE

There was a practitioner who had an exceptional gift for fixing health
problems. After serving the people for thirty years she happily retired.

Several years later an ex-patient who was experiencing health problems,

contacted the practitioner asking for help because her current doctors
and other health professionals were unable to provide a suitable remedy.

The practitioner reluctantly took up the challenge. She spent a very short
time with the patient and arrived at a diagnosis. “Ahh”, she said. “Here is
the problem”, and with an ink marker drew a cross on Mary’s chest
which took five seconds and then gave her a healing potion.

Within days Mary’s health had been fully restored.

The practitioner duly sent an account for $2,000.00.

After a month or so, a letter arrived from Mary’s accountant querying

what appeared to be an excessive bill.

The practitioner responded :

One Ink Mark …………………………………………………………… $ 1.00

Knowing Where To Put The Ink Mark .……………………….… $1,999.00

If you think the price of education is

too high

then consider the cost of ignorance

2
 WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY

Words can change their meanings over time, so I'll start by saying
that I use the term "sovereignty" as it is generally understood - both
in terms of national sovereignty and individual sovereignty.

In essence it means - self determination or self government.

When a nation talks about sovereignty, it means its right to determine

what goes on inside its borders. Its right to exist as a self-
determining, self-governing geographic area.

When an individual talks about sovereignty, he means his right to

determine what goes on in his own life.

To understand what is meant by sovereignty, let's go back a little,

and see how it arises.

In the world as it now stands, all land is the sovereign territory of one
nation or another, except the arctic regions which are controlled by
international treaty. The oceans of the world, apart from territorial
waters, are also covered by various treaties.

If you wanted to have your own sovereign piece of real estate –

you’re out of luck.

People may have thought it would be great if we could just buy an

island - and run it according to our own ideas.

This thinking misunderstands sovereignty.

Sure, you might purchase an island - there are many around the
world for sale. However, when you part with the cash, you are not
buying sovereignty, that still resides with the country whose
jurisdiction extends over the island.

You’d soon find out who was sovereign if you tried to eliminate
income tax on your newly acquired island.

If you really wanted to claim your own sovereign territory, you'd need
to keep a watchful eye out for the emergence of a complete new land
- say an undersea volcano erupting into a new land mass.

Now, such a new land mass (provided it was outside existing

territorial waters) would indeed be "unclaimed" land and this is where
we get to the nub of what sovereignty really is.

3
Suppose such a new island appears, in the middle of an ocean
somewhere, and you rush by helicopter and land on it. All you would
need to do is put up your ‘flag’ - and you would have claimed
sovereignty over it.

Unfortunately, you may not be alone. While you are rushing all by
yourself to your newly discovered island, it is highly likely that some
nearby nation is likewise sending a landing party - claiming some
"special case" as to why it should be theirs.

When push comes to shove, they may decide to remove you by force
of arms and the ensuing potential conflict of interest encapsulates the
entire history of the world - the battle for territory.

So you can certainly claim sovereignty over a new piece of land but
you’ll also need to be able to defend this new found sovereignty.

In these enlightened times one may expect that might is not always
right, and that some international court may arbitrate the issue.

It still doesn't change the basic fact that sovereignty must first be
claimed - then defended.

If sovereignty didn't need defending, then no country would be in

need of armed forces.

Sovereignty is therefore at the mercy of any party that chooses to

dispute it.

Tax havens for example exist for this very reason, as a means of
defense.

It's a way of protecting sovereignty. It's not enough to simply stand

up and declare it - because those who oppose you may not play the
game by your rules and use force to deprive you of it.

To assume you have rights under some “constitution”, “statute” or

other historical “agreement” is to assume that sovereignty is handed
out by the state.

CONSTITUTION = CONSENT TO COMMERCIAL CONTRACT

You are not granted sovereignty by virtue of being born in any

particular country.

You are sovereign because of your status as a flesh and blood living-
soul - by virtue of you having an independent mind.

4
 GOVERNMENT IS FORECLOSED FROM PARITY WITH REAL PEOPLE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1795

“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction,

and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with
other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor
substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the
tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as
well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with
anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts
between them.”

“S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators (3 U.S. 54; L.ED. 57; 3 Dall.54)
Supreme Court of the United States 1795
[NOT the United States Supreme Court” –ed]

You are already sovereign - but a "prisoner" of a larger, more

powerful sovereignty – the state.

So, trying to defend your sovereignty by referring to such a state is

difficult to say the least.

Such a mistake could cost you dearly. Even though you may perceive
that some statute law may "save" you - you are ignoring the fact that
the state can simply rewrite their statutory laws and constitutions for
their own benefit.

So much for the "protection" of the law or constitution.

No, your sovereignty does not depend on the state. Man’s sovereignty
was in place long before the formation of the “state”.

You have it in the state's absence. Your task is to learn how to defend
it cleverly.

Of course, in the present world, there is no free nation. No place

where it is easy to fully assert your sovereignty.

However, by learning how to better protect your assets not based on

the laws of your nation state, but based on your capacity to outwit it
and out-manoeuvre it.

One option is to play off one nation state against another - by using
various "international" strategies known as "Offshore Asset Protection" -
and thereby use the laws of a country that doesn't have the capacity
to fully control you, to mitigate the laws of the country that does.

As awareness of true human sovereignty spreads and disillusionment

with the nation state grows, there will arise more and more means of
increasing one's practical freedom, one's sovereignty.
5
 OFFSHORE ASSET PROTECTION

THE ABILITY TO MOVE MONEY WITH A “MOUSE-CLICK”

FROM ONE INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION TO ANOTHER

1. Offshore private “Companies” and “Trusts” in a foreign jurisdiction.

2. Offshore debit and credit card facilities in a foreign jurisdiction.

3. Easy internet access for monitoring, transfers, purchases &

payments.

6
 Historical Perspective

The biblical book of Genesis explains who we are; where we come from;
and, ultimately the “king dome” under whose “sovereign law” we are
bound.

And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his
nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul
Genesis 2: 7 KJV

We can claim sovereign status under the “Law” of a “King” that is not of
this “world” [jurisdiction].

The land shall not be sold for ever; for the land is mine; and, you are strangers and
sojourners with me.
Levititicus 25:23 KJV

As people started to live together in societies, there was nothing to

prevent individuals from infringing upon the rights and freedoms of each
other.

Once that happened, there were only two choices; either, protect
ourselves or elect a group of individuals to protect our rights for us.

We chose the latter and man-made [government] was born.

Common law [always requires there to be an injured party]

The law of the Bible and similarly common law that has developed over
time, has but one purpose; to protect our fundamental rights and
freedoms of – life, liberty and property.

Common law is based on the “customs and traditions” of men, and

cannot be radically altered as that is the nature of tradition; to maintain
it as is without too much change.

Common law derives its force and authority from the indisputable
consent and practices of the people.

Its distinguishing feature is that it’s not written as a parliamentary

statute.

The purpose of law was never to restrict or destroy our rights and
freedoms. Its’ sole purpose, then and now, is to preserve and protect.

Throughout history law has been corrupted and used in ways it was
never intended to be used. Laws have been created to control and
enslave people for the sole benefit of those in power.
7
Today we live in a world where we are told that our fundamental rights
still exist, but there are times when we wonder; how is this so?

For example, we can have the full force of the law brought down upon us
with a traffic violation, income tax irregularity, refusing to fill in a census
form, etc.

These offences do no harm to the life, liberty or property of others.

There are no victims whose rights or freedoms have been violated so we

ask; “how can this be?”

The answer is that our fundamental rights and freedoms as “flesh and
blood people” are still intact [private law], but we have been tricked into
believing the parliamentary statutes created by government for
“corporations”

The government has secretly created a parallel system of law [public

law] that has enticed us spider-like into its jurisdictional web.

Statutory Jurisdiction

Modern day courts operate in any one of three (3) jurisdictions;

1. at Law (Does not compel performance - living-soul vs living-soul)

2. in Equity (compelled performance- contract, without any criminal aspects)

3. in Admiralty (compelled performance - contract, with criminal penalty)

4. Statutory Jurisdiction - (jumbled mix of all the above)

However, they use a fourth (4th) and somewhat secretive jurisdiction

that they call “Statutory Jurisdiction.”

This is a jumbled mix that contains the Uniform Commercial Code [UCC]
which is a statute governing the rules of commerce, even superior to
constitutions. However, hidden away within its’ articles is a common law
remedy. That means an accused party can always call for the “injured
party” to bought before the court for cross examination.

Mostly the “plaintiff” or “complainant” in a commercial or contractual

“cause of action” is a government created “artificial-legal-entity” exacting
and collecting revenue by way of fines or court penalties.

The courts act in the capacity of the government’s debt collector.

8
 The Ten Commandment Laws

There are two (2) jurisdictions operating in our lives today.

The Bible has always been known as God’s law.

The Law of the Ten Commandments has never changed, as no one on

earth has the authority to change one word of it.

If God says something is wrong, it was wrong six thousand years

ago, when it was given to Moses, and is still wrong today.

This is consistent with God’s character and true law.

Man’s statute laws are continually being changed and manipulated.

If man is the creator of true law then how do we explain the creation of
life, and the law that causes it. What causes the sun to rise; the wind to
blow; and, gravity. The foolishness of this argument is self evident.

True law cannot be changed or manipulated by man. “Statutes” are

“colourable law.”

Origin of Statute Law – Colourable Law

1. God created Man

2. Man created Government

3. Government create Statutes

Man was not created by the state [governments or parliaments] and it

follows that the created can never be greater than it’s creator.

Since when does the servant tell the master what to do. That’s treason.

Man-made statute or decree was how Caesar ruled Rome; and, today is
still being masqueraded as true law. This might better help you to
understand the scripture of :-

“give unto Caesar that which is Caesars”

and in it’s fuller context
“unto God that which is God’s”

You choose which jurisdiction you place yourself under.

9
 The following charted chronology is a visual ready reference.

2 Parallel
Jurisdictions

Biblical law Statute law

Private Public

God’s law Man’s law

Holy Bible Legislation

Status Status
Voluntary servitude Forced slavery

Created by the Created by

Breath-of-life Registration

Rights Privileges
Life, Liberty & Property Rewards and Penalties

Birth Berth
certification for people certification for vessels

Common law Admiralty law

Law on the land Law on the high seas

Living-soul Corporation-sole
Upper and lower case letters ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS
John Doe JOHN DOE

Fruits of labour Income

created by man’s energy created by artful accounting

Non-taxable Taxable
Living-soul Corporate-sole

10
We have been deceived into surrendering our natural-rights in exchange
for attractively presented privileges.

We have been made subservient to a man-made system of rewards and

penalties in order to gain power and control over our creative energy and
all that we’re capable of producing.

The product of our manual labour; the sweat of our collective brows,
part of which was intended for our creator, as thanks-giving and the
ethic on which charity is based, has been siphoned off by Caesar
[modern-day-government] in a brilliant deception of statutory smoke
and mirrors.

Government Tricks
In order to implement slave-like control of it’s citizens, governments had
to invent a system that would not directly violate peoples natural-rights;
but, at the same time allow them to control and own everything created
and produced by man [natural energy source.]

The technique was to create a secondary “corporate” entity [artificial-

legal-entity] that mimicked the existence of the original flesh and blood
living-soul so well, it was for the most part invisible; and could only be
readily identified in the written form. In the spoken form there is no
discernible difference.

For every living-soul the government through semantics and it’s Birth
Registries secretly created a mirror-like identity called a corporation-sole.

John Doe and JOHN DOE may sound the same but now you can see the
difference in the written form. When a noun is written in all-capital-
letters, the Rules of English Grammar says it’s either fictitious [without
substance] or it’s a company name [corporation].

Consequently, the government as creator of a “corporation” can now

demand anything it wants from [their] corporation simply by
manipulating the statute [Corporations Law].

One of the ways governments captured our natural rights and freedoms
has been the creation of artificial-legal-entities.

Through their statutes, they have created companies and corporations

[dead-corporate-entities] through the clever manipulation of language by
the re-definition of certain words.

The basic tool for the manipulation of truth, is the manipulation

of words. Words have been re-defined. If one can control the
meaning of words, one can control the people who use those
words.

11
For example the word “person” and “persons” has been re-defined in the
“Interpretation” clauses of their statutes as “a corporation”

They [the government] want you to assume the ordinary meaning of a

word so as to trick you into reading and interpreting the statute in their
favour.

You might like to refer to “Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law’s of England”.

Sir William was a pre-eminent juror in his time and an acknowledged

expert in English law.

He confirmed in his “expert” capacity that there are “two (2) person(s)”
recognised in law. Natural “person” and artificial “person”

However, one still needs to approach this thinking with caution as

“natural-person” is often taken to mean “human-being” and the
dictionary defines “human-being” as a “half-monster”.

Therefore in statutory or legal matters we should not use the term

“person” natural or artificial; you are better off using “man” or “flesh and
blood living-soul” This nicely avoids any mis-interpretation or mis-
understanding.

A CLEVER DECEPTION

When mothers give birth to babies they volunteer, through the medical
and nursing staff, all the associated information which is then recorded
on to a government information database.

This act of recording is the basis of a registry [Births, Deaths & Marriages
Registry]. At some later point, mother or child will then apply to the
government for a certified extract retrieved from this recorded
information, in the form of a Birth Certificate

This is the same information used by the government to create your

second identity, but with a clever twist. It now becomes “give berth to” not
“give birth to” Again, it sounds the same but when written you can now see
there is a distinct difference.

Now it’s a bit easier to see. One is a “berth conceived of a “registry” the other is
a “birth conceived of a woman”

Both “Birth/Berth-Certificates” are “Property Deeds of Title” that governments

through the prism of their central banks use as a negotiable instrument
against which credit is advanced by the international funding community,
12
namely The World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Bank of
International Settlements, Bank of England, Federal Reserve Bank of
America etc.

It is at this point that the Biblical law available to “living-souls and flesh and
blood-people” almost miraculously disappears before our very eyes to be
replaced by statutory artifice of [roman-law] – “person”

Most people will go their entire lives without ever discovering this clever
deception.

At first this is a little difficult to grasp but with a bit of perseverance you
will come to appreciate the thinking behind such carefully crafted words.

Once the government creates their artificial entity that simulates you
[i.e. appears to be the same as you from your point of view], but is actually a
contrivance of government statutes and regulations -- then they’ve got
you.

When you fill out paperwork, application forms and attach your signature,
then you have unwittingly agreed to a contract.

This makes you subservient to all their rules and regulations through
“assumpsit [latin for assumed] contract” because you acknowledge their “Terms of
Agreement” by your act of “applying for” or making “application for”

The government tricks you, John Doe into volunteering as an “agent for” or
“officer of” their corporate-entity JOHN DOE.

Hence “John Doe” [living-soul] mistakenly believes that he is “JOHN DOE”

[corporation-sole] and in the confusion forfeits his natural-rights.

In being a party to such an agreement or contract, albeit unwittingly;

you, as a “living-soul, flesh and blood-man” are deemed to have voluntarily
surrendered your rights under God’s Biblical law in exchange for
honouring government statute(s).

NOW TAKE A LOOK AT YOUR

• Driver’s Licence
• Vehicle Registration
• Passport
• Birth Certificate
• Bank Account
• Credit Card
• Tax Assessment
• Property Deeds
• Commercial contracts
• Memberships

13
They are in the ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS name of the artificial-legal-entity;
and, you have been encouraged to believe there is no difference.

Applying for a “Tax File Number” or lodging an “Income Tax Return” is considered
to be a contractual agreement that although may extend privileges,
usually you neglect to acquaint yourself with all the penalties that apply
which more often than not, are well camouflaged by the tangle of rules
and regulations.

NOW GIVE SOME THOUGHT TO THE FOLLOWING

Have you ever applied for School Enrolment

Have you ever applied for a Birth Certificate

Have you ever applied for a Driver’s Licence
Have you ever applied for a Census Form
Have you ever applied for a Passport
Have you ever applied for a Tax File Number
Have you ever applied for a Welfare Benefit
Have you ever applied for a Bank Account
Have you ever applied for a Credit Card
Have you ever applied for a Mortgage

Have you ever applied to become a Subject of

Have you ever applied to become a Citizen of
Have you ever applied to become a Resident of
Have you ever applied to become a Member of
Have you ever applied to become a Voter
Have you ever applied to become a Elector

Have you ever applied to register a Trust

Have you ever applied to register a Company
Have you ever applied to register a Land Title Teed
Have you ever applied to register a Property Title
Have you ever applied to register a Motor Vehicle

All the above-mentioned have one thing in common - the act of applying - but
more precisely a contractual agreement whereby you voluntarily and
willingly request by the submission of an “Application Form” and are now
contractually bound to all sorts of fines, taxes, duties, tariffs, customs,
excise, registration, permit and licence fees.

14
We have voluntarily agreed, albeit unwittingly, to be government’s
paramount natural energy source in return for privileges and penalties,
rather than exercising our God-given rights which have fallen from sight
in the mistaken belief that only the state can provide for our interests
and wellbeing.

THE LAW OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACT

We’ve totally succumbed to a system of statutes, regulations, codes,

ordinances and quasi laws that unrelentingly renders us ripe for the
plundering.

In failing to properly recognise and arrest the onslaught of this insatiable

juggernaut, we will have perpetuated a curse that will continue on down
the generations to haunt our heirs and successors.

When taxation that starts at 12% can be arbitrarily lifted to 30% then
60%, 80% and onwards, it soon becomes apparent that 100% is
possible; and in so doing reveals the true nature of the beast.

Only living-souls can generate the energy required to create and produce
anything; but, this man-made system of artificial-legal-entities has
provided a means of swindling flesh and blood people out of their rightful
entitlements.

AVOIDING PROSECUTION

Natural justice or the right of due process allows for any accusation
[violation of law] to be tested [heard] before a properly convened court
that will examine the evidence put before a jury of our peers to decide
guilt or innocence.

However when a parliamentary statute has been breached or violated,

then their court is a legislated government body headed by a magistrate
or a judge.

WHO IS THE COMPLAINANT /PLAINTIFF

An example is a traffic matter where the issuing police officer as [agent of

the crown], becomes the informant.

15
The complaining party in reality is not the on-duty policemen. He’s only
acting “on behalf of”; or as “agent for”

Substitute the word “agent” for “officer” and you will see why all
“Australian Citizens” according to the statutes are “persons
[corporations]” and therefore “agents” acting for or on behalf of a
statutory-artificial-legal-entity called a “person”.

This in and of itself is against God’s law because we are created by God
therefore we belong to God, not the state [Caesar].

“The Police” and “The Crown”; are totally separate corporate-legal-entities.

They are both registered under the Australian Securities and Investment
Commission [ASIC] with their own ACN’s [Australian Company Numbers]

The following sample, will confirm this information as publicly available

on ASIC’s website.

Now you can better see that the complainant is actually a company
operating under “Corporate law” and more importantly the law governing
corporate contracts.

You, the flesh and blood, living-soul; have been corporatised by a

deceptive means, though the re-definition of the word “person” which
according to the statute is a “corporation”

Australian Company Number Entity Name

ACN 056108402 NSW POLICE

ACN 051038843 N.S.W. POLICE DEPARTMENT
ACN 062005850 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN 054595649 NSW POLICE SERVICE
ACN 056466963 NSW POLICE SERVICE
ACN 056104940 NSW POLICE SERVICE
ACN 057000521 NSW POLICE SERVICE
ACN 065230122 NSW POLICE SERVICE
ACN 074297233 NSW POLICE SERVICE
ACN 074402494 NSW POLICE SERVICE
ACN 054595096 NSW POLICE SERVICE

Fundamental to understanding how to be a true suveran [living-soul] is

learning how to repel the government’s attempts at attaching
“artificiality” to us.

16
Because the government is artificial [not a living organism], then anything it
creates is artificial.

The government does not have any energy in it’s own right. It exists
only by the creative energy [productivity] of the people [living-souls].

It is an intangible entity, a fiction [without life or substance / not

responsive to touch]; and, thus fictitious or artificial [dead] – not a living
organism.

Only living organisms can produce other living organisms. Living-souls

imbued with the breath-of-life, can trace this inheritance back to the
original source, through genealogical lineages.

God, as the creator of this law reveals this in the Bible.

And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his
nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul
Genesis 2: 7 KJV

Even non believers have difficulty in challenging the merits of the Ten
Commandments around which the biblical gospels are founded.

More importantly, the state [British Protestant Crown] is bound by

biblical law.

This is critical to understanding and invoking sovereign-immunity.

It’s only the artificial that fall within the crown’s [court’s] jurisdiction not
living-souls and flesh and blood people.

CHALLENGING JURISDICTION

Definition of jurisdiction; juris [an oath] diction; [verbal]

We must learn how to successfully challenge the jurisdiction of a

statutory court by rebutting all of the false assumptions they make,
otherwise your silence will be interpreted as voluntarily surrendering
jurisdiction.

Be warned though, that turning up in person before a court is routinely

interpreted as the voluntary surrender of jurisdiction.

You are deemed to be “joined” in the discussion [matter] on the basis of

your behaviour; otherwise why would you have bothered to appear.
17
There is a little known procedure whereby the court does recognise your
right of “Special Appearance” but only to make a challenge to the court’s
jurisdiction. Under this circumstance the court accepts that you are not
voluntarily surrendering to it’s jurisdiction.

However, you may not engage in any other discussion or presentation of

documents or argument regarding the matter before the court, because
you are not yet recognised as being “joined in the matter”

This forum of “Special Appearance” can quickly revert to “General Appearance”

and is a difficult procedure to conduct.

Part 1 – You must deny being an “artificial-legal-entity”

Either by “letter” or “affidavit” you need to identify and refute the

following.

That there are two (2) similar-sounding entities identified in law :-

(a) Dead, artificial-legal-entity - JOHN DOE

(b) Living-soul and flesh & blood man - John Doe

Remember as well, Mister [Mr], Missus [Mrs] and Madam are tags that
identity you as an artificial-entity.

If for example a judge or a magistrate addresses you as Mr Doe; just

invite them to call you John “… your honour may call me John”.

Otherwise do not respond either physically or verbally. Remain

respectfully mute and non-responsive.

That neatly avoids their attempt at gaining jurisdiction.

Part 2 – You must deny having an “address”

An address is artificial. Similarly a construct of the imagination. You do

not live at an address. You live in your skin. You live under a tree or the
stars. You live or inhabit a shelter. You live in the greater universe
continuum.

18
If you allow the artificial “tag” of “resident” or “address” to be attached
to you, then the state construes that by default and your silence, you
must be their artificial creation.

The correct method of contact or access, without surrendering

jurisdiction is :-
General Post

The word “post” does not refer to any corporate activity to do with
artificial-legal-entities; but the word “mail” does.

You should also know how and when to use a “postcode” which indicates
commercial activity between “corporate” entities.

Part 3 – You must deny being a “defendant”

Use the term “accused”

When a “complainant” issues their paperwork; “Court Attendance Notice” Or

“Summons” they routinely refer to you as the defendant

You should never accept under any circumstances this unassuming “tag”
because it wrongly presumes, you, the living-soul and sovereign-man
has something to defend and if you remain silent on this then the court
interprets your silence as agreeing that you do have something to
defend, thus joining you in the “controversy” and declaring you to be a
self-confessed party to the matter.

You must always rebut this assumption in a carefully worded and filed
“affidavit” or “letter” addressed to the Registrar of the Court.

Part 4 – You must deny “agreeing to contract through

offering to make a plea”

Guilty or not guilty has yet to be proven [established]. Until then it’s
“innocent”

By insisting on a plea the court [magistrate] is attempting to gain

jurisdiction by enticing you into a contractual agreement; thus gaining
jurisdiction over the living-soul and sovereign-you, most times without
your ever realising it.

19
You need to clearly state, verbally or in writing or both, that you are
“innocent” and that by not offering to plea, the court can not construe that
you have consented to contract or voluntarily surrendered to the court’s
jurisdiction.

When you turn up before the court for the first time, the Magistrate will
always try and somehow coax you into willingly entering a plea of guilty
or not guilty, in order to gain jurisdiction.

Sometimes it might be a seemingly innocent question by a Judge such as

“Do you understand the charge(s)?” Remember this; another way
to ask the same question would reveal it’s true nature. “Do you stand
under the charges?” Now it is much easier to see the well disguised
meaning in this question.

If you admit to “standing under” the charge; then that’s contractual. You
have just placed yourself into the court’s jurisdiction.

Eventually out of desperation they will even enter a “not guilty” plea on
your behalf, which is why you need to categorically state it in writing for
the court record that you are innocent and do not consent to contract
with the court by voluntarily entering a plea. At least at a later point it
can be shown to be invalid.

Your affidavit should clearly state that you, the living-soul and sovereign-
man is “innocent” thus nicely avoiding any assumed contract through the
act of entering a plea.

Most people do not realise why the police and the courts like you to have
a solicitor, lawyer or licenced legal counsel, who as part of their job
description, are taught to somehow secure of plea [guilty or not guilty].

If you indicate any objection, their role is to persuade or convince you,

otherwise. Sometimes they may even step in and do it on your behalf,
making it look like they’re doing you a favour, all the time hoping you’ll
not object. It’s an original act of true sleaze.

The focus here has nothing to do with innocence or guilt. It is the act of
offering to plea, which in effect is offering to contract.

So up to this point, your letter or affidavit is a method of rebutting

[denying] these sneaky assumptions of jurisdiction through contract.

Again, most people will fail to realise that by remaining silent on these
seemingly unimportant matters, it will be taken as your voluntary
agreement to surrender jurisdiction to the court.

20
Part 5 – You must deny “having a lawyer or solicitor”

Most people are not aware that the engagement of a lawyer or solicitor
automatically gives jurisdiction to the crown [court].

Licenced legal practitioners have taken an oath of office that binds their
loyalty to the crown. They forfeit their professional indemnity [insurances
etc] if they promulgate [practise or spread] sovereign-law.

They are professionally trained in statute-law to re – present on behalf of an

artificial-legal-entity because it is without substance or actuality.

That is, it has no conscience, morals, brain, voice, mobility etc.

The presence of a solicitor or lawyer before a court is a silent signal to a

magistrate or judge that the court can safely assume it has jurisdiction
because legal professionals as part of their job description, are routinely
taught to secure this consent from their clients.

They go as far as to provide a “Consent to Jurisdiction Form” which they sign

on your behalf, often without bothering to disclose this to you.

Therefore, you have voluntarily consented to the crown’s [court’s]

jurisdiction without even realising it.

AT THIS POINT YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY :-

1. Denied being a dead-artificial-legal-entity
2. Denied having an address
3. Denied being a defendant
4. Denied agreeing to contract by offering a plea
5. Denied “consent to jurisdiction” provided by default through a
lawyer or solicitor acting on your behalf.

In order for you just to get to this point you do have to understand a
great deal more about some of the other fundamental processes of the
law and how it works, otherwise if a Magistrate were to question you on
some of the contents of your affidavit, a vague response could bring all
your efforts undone.

Sometimes understanding only a little can be very dangerous. It can be

just enough to get you into trouble.

21
It’s like putting a loaded gun in the hands of child and hoping for the
best. You need to be sure of all the facts and how to successfully
articulate them.

IN CONCLUSION

For those of you interested in “sovereignty” and what it truely means,

my hope is that this document will help you unravel some of the truths
and peel back the layers that cleverly disguise what is being
masqueraded as “the law”.

Invoking sovereign or biblical law in my opinion is far superior to the

everchanging man-made statutes of a parliament.

The Bible is the key that unlocks the mystery of the universe to Man and
the mystery of Man to himself. It is a book of the emancipation of man.

The emancipation of man means his delivery from sorrow, sickness,

poverty, uncertainty, ignorance, limitation, and finally from death itself.

That we as part of His sovereign creation – the greater universe

continuum - may have life in abundance.

"I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly"
John 10:10

END

22