GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT Our founders purposely placed the power of the Grand Jury in the

Bill of Rights to make it clear that it belongs to the people, and the government is not to violate it. It is the

“ultimate power” of the people which allows them to consent or not to the actions of their servant government. It

also prevents government from unrighteous prosecutions by forcing the government to seek permission from the

people before criminal charges can be filed; if the people refuse it cannot go forward. By understanding this

principle it becomes clear that the government has no authority to control your behavior, and therefore neither do

legislators—without your consent. The declaration of Independence says: “We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among

these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among

Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” ALL MEN DECIDE whether they want to

participate in the institutions of men or not. The United States Supreme Court confirmed this when they said:

“…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. he is not bound by any institutions

formed by his fellowman without his consent.” (Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 May term, 1796) There are only three

ways a court can hear a criminal complaint: (1) One or more of the people sign a sworn affidavit that they have

been injured; (2) A prosecutor, on behalf of the government, brings an accusation before the Grand Jury and the

Grand Jury either indicts or does nothing; (3) The Grand Jury by its “own will,” can investigate merely on suspicion

that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not; and if it finds wrongdoing it can

present it to the court and it must go to trial. No one can second guess the Grand Jury, unless the Grand Jury’s

actions violate another’s unalienable rights. Consent and Jurisdiction: it’s all about Consent and Jurisdiction. In

order to possess liberty it is extremely important that you understand consent: our servant government cannot do

anything without your consent. Any authority our servants have is by our consent; if they act outside their

authority they are subject to criminal charges under US Codes 42 and 18, and are liable for damages under US

Codes and common law. The Fifth Amendment states: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or

otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury…,” therefore our servant

government requires the people to get an indictment (grand jury). Judges (servant) have no authority to make a

ruling or a judgment on people (master) without your consent. In legal terms, when the judge asks you “do you

understand?” he means, do you stand under the authority of this court? So, when you say “Yes,” you just gave
 him/her jurisdiction over you! Our U.S. Constitution only authorizes “common law courts,” also known as “courts

of record.” A court of record removes the power of the Judge to make a ruling; his role is that of the

“administrator” of the court. The final decision maker is the “tribunal,” who is either the “sovereign plaintiff” or a

“jury.” Remember, the servant cannot rule over the master; can the clay rule over the potter? “…every man is

independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. he is not bound by any institutions formed by his

fellowman without his consent.” (Cruden v. Neale) herein is Liberty: if “yOU” do not give the court consent, they

have no “JURISdICtION” over “yOU”! Under US Codes 42 and 18, when you are detained—without your consent—

for violating a statute, you have just been kidnapped; and if the Judge sets a bail, he just set a ransom; and when

the prosecutor confirms the charges, they are all part of a conspiracy, and “yOU” can put them in jail and sue them

for damages. It’s all about Consent and Jurisdiction.

1. COURT The court belongs to the sovereign, plaintiff (people). Black’s Law dictionary, 5th edition, page 318 defines
the court as “The person and suit of the sovereign; the place where the sovereign sojourns with his regal retinue,
wherever that may be.” In the US Supreme Court case Isbill v. Stovall, the court was defined as “An agency of the
sovereign created by it directly or indirectly under its authority, consisting of one or more officers, established and
maintained for the purpose of hearing and determining issues of law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged
violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions of the law, authorized to exercise its powers in the course of law
at times and places previously determined by lawful authority.” “JUdICIAL NOtICe, or knowledge upon which a
judge is bound to act without having it proved in evidence.” (Black’s Law 4th edition) take Judicial notice that
judges are bound by oath to obey American Jurisprudence book. JUDGES SWORN TO OBEY. “Since the constitution
is intended for the observance of the judiciary as well as other departments of government and the judges are
sworn to support its provisions, the courts are not at liberty to overlook or disregard its commands or counteract
evasions thereof, it is their duty in authorized proceedings to give full effect to the existing constitution and to
obey all constitutional provisions irrespective of their opinion as to the wisdom or the desirability of such
provisions and irrespective of the consequences, thus it is said that the courts should be in our alert to enforce the
provisions of the United States Constitution and guard against their infringement by legislative fiat or otherwise in
accordance with these basic principles, the rule is fixed that the duty in the proper case to declare a law
unconstitutional cannot be declined and must be performed in accordance with the delivered judgment of the
tribunal before which the validity of the enactment it is directly drawn into question. If the Constitution prescribes
one rule and the statute another in a different rule, it is the duty of the courts to declare that the Constitution and
not the statute governs in cases before them f Am I getting due process?
2. Am I in a court of record?

3. Is the court acting under the color of law?

4. Are all my unalienable rights protected under the Bill of Rights being acknowledged by the court.

or judgment.” (16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 155:) Schworck Court

_______________________________________________________________________

a ‘court of record’ in accord with the common law of man

 _______________________________________________________________________

at the Dane county Courthouse

i: man;

prosecutor Claim: Trespass; theft of services

John Doe, Jane Doe (verified)

37 | P a g e

wrongdoer

i: man; declare,

contrary to the law of man, said wrongdoers trespass upon i by way of theft of services;

said trespass is a causual source of damage and harm and loss to i;

said trespass began and continues to this day;

said wrongdoer does recieve compensation to carry out said services;

said wrongdoer failed and refused to carry out servies to i;

i say here and will verify in open court that all here in be true;

You Richard Schnell, presume I a mans person is a legal person bound by your codes and

statutes, it is not.
 I require you to restore my property (claims) immediately.

you wanna send over your mail then best pay attention to the following terms of engagement

with my manly self... lol

• All responses must be sent exclusively to the following contacting name and location:

38 | P a g e

Julz,

c/o Post Office Box 19xx,

at Cockout City, non-domestic

• Any further attempt to send any correspondence to any entity who is not the author himself as

indicated above, which incurs on any further insults, misdescriptions, titles of nobility, and/or anything else which

diminishes the author’s capacities as well as his lawful and natural standing to the status of personhood, and

therefore is noticed to be inviting the author to commit fraud and/or perjury by tacit acceptance, is hereby

denounced and is continuously being repudiated, rebutted and refused for fraud, and therefore will be returned to

sender, inexorably.

• Furthermore all responses to this Notice must be sent by you and none of your agents, nor

principals, nor subordinates; given that the record proves consistently that these corporate entities have been

unable, unwilling and/or incompetent in bringing any and all the outstanding matters of law to a proper and lawful
clarification and further resolution. The envelope itself, which you choose to use in order to send any

correspondence to this author, must also be clearly and unmistakably identifiable whereby the name of the man or

woman sending it under complete and unrestricted liability for the envelope as well as for its contents, must be

legible and clearly written, to avoid further deception, fraud and/or perjury, as well as any remote chance of a

later claim of plausible deniability on your behalf.

respectfully at law ;)

this is why i don't get into things with You, Julz, using legalese in common law ...attempting,

threatening to extort For jurisdictional purposes, namely the interstate commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution

(Art. I, Sec 8, Clause 3),

your claim of residency of a state is used to subject you to regulation under the interstate

commerce clause.

When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes

expressly depriving him of

jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost. Rankin v. Howard, (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den. Zeller v.

Rankin, 101 S.Ct.

42 | P a g e

2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326.

Some Defendants urge that any act "of a judicial nature" entitles the Judge to absolute judicial

immunity. But in a

jurisdictional vacuum, (that is, absence of all jurisdiction) the second prong necessary to absolute

judicial immunity

is missing. Stump v. Sparkman, id., 435 U.S. 349.

 "Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to

jurisdiction." Piper v.

Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872)

"A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to

immunity from

civil action for his acts." Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689 (1938)

"Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction

even if those acts

have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear

absence of all

jurisdiction." Gregory v. Thompson, 500 F2d 59 (C.A. Ariz. 1974)

"There is a general rule that a ministerial officer who acts wrongfully, although in good faith, is

nevertheless liable

in a civil action and cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign." Cooper v. O'Conner, 99 F.2d

133

"When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction

requisites he may

be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good

faith, that he had

jurisdiction." State use of Little v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 217 Miss. 576, 64 So. 2d 697.

"The courts are not bound by an officer's interpretation of the law under which he presumes to

act." Hoffsomer v.

Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227 F 417.

"A Judge is not immune for tortious acts committed in a purely Administrative, non-judicial

capacity." Forrester v.

White, 484 U.S. at 227-229, 108 S.Ct. at 544-545; Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. at 380, 98 S.Ct. at

1106. Mireles v.
 Waco, 112 S.Ct. 286 at 288 (1991).

"A Judge is not immune for tortious acts committed in a purely Administrative, non-judicial

capacity. Forrester v.

White, 484 U.S. at 227-229, 108 S.Ct. at 544-545; Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. at 380, 98 S.Ct. at

1106. Mireles v.

Waco, 112 S.Ct. 286 at 288 (1991).

"The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can

war against the

Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it." Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct.

1401 (1958).

"If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void." In re Sawyer,

124 U.S. 200 (1888),

"he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason."

"When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes

expressly depriving him

of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost." Rankin v. Howard, (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den. Zeller

v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct.

2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326.

A Sovereign is NOT subject to the Courts' corporate administrative rulings and can place

commercial liens against

all who have violated his rights.

I, Bob Johnson (your name), gave no entity, known as the DHR, the right to administrate my

property. (You can use this with child services; you can use it for a car, etc,) 2. I say that Baby Johnson (car, etc) is

my property. 3. I say that no man or woman will make a claim saying that my claim is untrue. 4. I want my property

returned to me. 5. Said property is to be totally under my control post haste, within 3 days (or whatever time you
want to give them.) 6. I will charge the wrongful holder of said property X amount of dollars every (minute) (day)

said property is not returned starting on the twenty-second day after they have received this summons and this

suit. See attached Claim.

LAWFUL RESOLUTION

Exhibits "U", "V", "W", "X" and "Y" are integrated and included by reference as though

completely stated and visible herein;

and then close it off with the below;

by the light of this Fourth day of the month of July of the year Two-thousand-and-fifteen, (C.E.); i

say here, and gɸd-willing will verify in ‘open court’ that all herein be: ––(a) true, ––(b) [the] law;

54 | P a g e

................................................. ;

[i, [a] man/claimer ’s] sign-manual ; [JCoR’s] seal.

07. Proof of service

so the court knows who got a copy;

08. summons (issued by the clerk)

09. proof of service (a form usually included with the summons)

A motion to move the court to do something could consist of the following:

 01. Notice of Motion

02. Motion

03. Facts (Point & Authorities)

another name for points and authorities is brief, of course as you know if there’s anything in the

world that’s not brief, it’s a brief… if you really wanted to give it a full descriptive name you would call it: points,

authorities and arguments, but they never say the argument word, they just say points and authorities;

a. Point(s) being made

COUNTERDEFENDANTS ADMIT FACTS SHOWING THEY HAVE COMMITTED WRONGFUL ACTS

UNDER COLOR OF LAW, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, THUS BREACHING THEIR DUTY TO COUNTERPLAINTIFF. THEIR

DEMURRER SHOULD BE DENIED.

55 | P a g e

now what you see right above is an example of a point being made, in fact the above was the

whole point in respect to what followed in a paper called: “POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO

DEMURRER OF Arnorld, Ellison, Solkolov, AND Wiley”, now normally what you do is you make your point in all

capital letters, center page, arranged in a way that’s easy to read and as short and sweet as possible and the next

thing that you put in is the law, or authority, some authority that supports your point of view;

1/4/2016 1:12:23 PM] David Man: Notice: man

i, man, [David] declare,

Firstly: i, man, am unaware of ever volunteering consent to be treated as a {resident of the

United States; [defined as in 26 U.S. Code § 7701 - Definitions]} (see Exhibit A)

 Secondly: i, man, know of no man who has shown i of such voluntary consent and believe none

exists;

Thirdly: if ever i, man, have unknowingly volunteered or consented to such a thing, i, man, do not

voluntarily consent now;

Fourthly: i, man, wish to not be treated as such a designation and do not voluntarily accept any

such title; i, man, self-govern, require no title, no representation; (See Exhibit B)

Fifthly: i, say all here, and will verify in open court, that all herein be true;

Dear Leslie: greeting,

When did i ever give you permission to administer my property;

What evidence exists that you have my consent to use and enjoy my property;

What evidence exists that a man or woman came before i in open court, with a verifiable claim to

my property;

Are you aware that: i, a man did report a trespass; robbery; theft of my property,

Are you aware that: i, require my property restored immediately to i and only i;

Do as you wish, Leslie Martin, the property owner needs to be compensated at 700 per hour

every hour totaling 16,800 per day, every day the property is not restored, i will forward on the bill to You today

for the continued used and enjoyment of my property and on this same day every week billed weekly;
 PS: If they stole your marijuana (trespassed by way of theft), then file a claim requiring the

immediate restoration of your Property, and require $1.00/second from the commencement of the crime until

your property is restored.

'i: a man; claim bob jones trespass by way of filing false claims against me; interfering with my

rights; extortion; barratry; unjust enrichment; i require compensation of two hundred-fifty thousand dollars; i

require a court

Here is the Notice:

" i: a man; require the STATE OF TEXAS to show up and verify his/her claim against me so i may

cross examine my accuser (the plaintiff must appear) and compensate him/her for any harm i may have caused. If

this man/woman that goes by the name 'STATE OF TEXAS' cannot show up to verify his/her claim, i require this

matter immediately discharged. It is my belief there is no man/woman named 'STATE OF TEXAS' who can verify

this claim by uttering with his/her voice I've done wrong or caused him/her personal harm, injury, or loss,

therefore pressing it upon the record in open court. It is also my belief, that someone is filing complaints (false

claims) on behalf of this entity known as the 'STATE OF TEXAS' in an attempt to unjustly enrich themselves and the

'STATE OF TEXAS' (whoever those individuals may be) and deprive me of my property without due process of law.

If this matter is not immediately discharged, i will be requiring leave of court so i may bring a proper and verifiable

claim before the court to address this trespass against me in the proper venue-a court of record (trespasses being:

filing false claims, barratry, malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, theft, robbery, etc.), in which i will be

requiring compensation for the trespasses and wasting my valuable time, money, and resources having to deal

with this complaint, as i do not have time to answer complaints without compensation at this time. If there is an

actual verifiable claim before the court, i will be more than happy to show up free of charge and address any

proper and verifiable claim against me. i also require and order the immediate restoration of my property (see
Exhibit A) and one dollar per second from the commencement of the crime till my property is restored - your name

here.'

Note: If there is no theft/robbery of property involved, just leave that out of the Notice. Property

is anything you enjoy exclusive Right to. If it is a CPS case involving children, you use the wordproperty, not

'children'. The STATE has no control over property, but they do have control over words they use in their statutes

such as 'child', 'infant', 'children', 'motor vehicle', 'marijuana', 'automatic weapons', 'firearms', 'land', 'homes',

'bicycles', etc. You always want to use that word 'property', period! And 'Exhibit A' should be a photo of the

property attached to the back of your Notice; a photocopy of that property is fine.

Either someone can show up and VERIFY the claim by pressing it upon the record in open court,

or there is no case, period. The prosecutor cannot verify the claim because he has no first hand knowledge, and

nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss to himself or his property.

Simply put, he's filing false claims to unjustly enrich himself, and this entity known as the 'STATE

OF TEXAS', or 'IRS', or 'UNITED STATES', etc. You're letting the man/woman who's prosecuting this case against you

know, that if they don't discharge this nonsense before the next hearing, you are going to stop the next hearing in

its tracks by saying "i require leave of court so I may bring a proper and verifiable claim against YOU for filing false

claims against me, and I will be requiring compensation for the trespasses.

85 | P a g e

Your claim supercedes his silly complaint. You can verify your claim, but he cannot verify the

complaint, as he himself has no first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss

to himself or his property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff because there is no man named 'STATE OF TEXAS'

who can take the stand and verify the complaint, either.

Court is a place for man to settle claims, not complaints.

You'll want to enter that Notice into an existing case they have against you. If the prosecutor

doesn't discharge/dismiss the case after reading that Notice, he's calling your bluff. When you get to the hearing,

simply keep your mouth shut and keep referring the judge back to your Notice anytime he's asks you questions

because he's more than likely trying to pull you out of the Common Law and back into their jurisdiction (control).
 If they insist on continuing or ignoring you, then do what you said you would do in the Notice and

REQUIRE (to demand by right and by authority) leave of court for a few days so you can perfect your actual claim

against the prosecutor and drag his ass into court as a defendant for filing false claims against you. Because the

compensation you will be requiring for the trespass shall exceed twenty dollars, you'll be able to drag him into a

trial by jury (see Article VII) as a defendant for filing false claims against you that no Plaintiff showed up to verify.

Make sure u serve it upon the wrongdoer and give them 21 days to respond… you take your

claim and proff of delivery and give it to the court clerk and then both of you can have your trial on the same

day…21 days from then...together running parallel….

If a prosecutor is claiming the 'UNITED STATES' is the Plaintiff in his suit against you, then for the

love of God make him produce his Plaintiff so you may cross examine your accuser. Article VI guarantees you that

right (that Right predates the Constitution). He can't produce the Plaintiff, because the 'UNITED STATES' is not a

living man who can utter with his voice you've done wrong and caused him personal harm, injury, or loss ..... and

this is how you call them out on it and hold them personally accountable for filing false claims against you.

So we want to be IN our court, and AT their building. We can be operating IN law as long as it’s

OUR OWN law, as long as WE CREATE OUR OWN LAWS. I’ll accept some benefits and I’ll not accept some other

benefits. These are benefits from my forefathers, you trustee, just hand me the trust the assets the forefathers

(the trustor/grantor) created for me, you can’t hold me obligated to a gift. Just because I’m a beneficiary of social

security, doesn’t mean I’m obligated to compensate for the gift. Why would he establish this gift for me if it was an

obligation?

c.f.“When a man says he is building a house for himself and his posterity, he does not mean to be

understood as saying that he has any thought of binding them, nor is it to be inferred that he [*5] is so foolish as to

imagine that he has any right or power to bind them, to live in it. So far as they are concerned, he only means to be

understood as saying that his hopes and motives, in building it, are that they, or at least some of them, may find it

for their happiness to live in it.” -Lysander Spooner, No Treason.

 Mother IN law, not AT law. Because wife and husband created law by marriage contract. We are

in a marriage contract, that makes the spouse’s mother and father IN laws. We’re IN, embraced, in the law.

No lawyers are allowed IN, they’re AT law. They cannot be party-to the law. A “void judgement”

never existed. “I want void judgement” be careful with this, it means we want to void ALL the items on the

judgement void. I.E. when someone wants to regain custody of kids, their judgement for custody is lumped

together with divorce. When they void the judgement for custody, they also void the divorce.

SEPARATE all our orders into different judgements so we don’t run into this problem.

When we’re in common law we place the orders, not the guy in black. Call the guy in black dress

“magistrate [judge]”. Because in the common law court we just want him to sit back and say he witnessed the

event, take the rendering from the jury/the verdict, to the district court clerk’s office, let her stamp it and say that

he witnessed it this is true verdict from the jury, this is the true bill they handed down, and this is what all parties

are supposed to get, and forever hold your peace, no appeals.

The more words used, the more limited the subject becomes. We narrow it down by talking

more.

First notice them Then a cease and desist Then i give them the order(what this is going to cost)

Then i hand them the bill ( if they want particulars they can ask i don’t offer it overtly)
 91 | P a g e

- The proper use of words Most important common law words are “in, at, on, for, upon”, things

having to do with location. “in” means contained, being under the jurisdiction of the container. I’m nowhere else

except being in my body. “on” if we are on something that doesn’t belong to us, we are trespassing. “at” is near

to it, close to it, but not trespassing. “upon” something implies an aggressive approach, it’s a form of attack. Any

trespass upon I a man and my person and property etc.

The last word is the subject, the word before it is the modifier.

- Karl's fair warning letter I (name) give no entity the right to administrate my property; I say that

(car/kid etc) is my property; I say that no man or woman is will make a claim saying my claim is untrue; I want my

property returned to me; said property is to be totally under my control post haste within (time limit); I will charge

the wrongful holder of said property X amount of dollars for every (day/minute) said property is not returned

starting on the twenty-second day after they’ve received this summons and this suit, see attached claim.

21 days are there to try to settle the matter.

Using cf. "compare to" in your court documents

Is there a claim in Court? Is there a man to verify that claim?

My contention is both the man and the person are here. Before we begin I require the Court

establishes
 93 | P a g e

jurisdiction over the man.

Is there anything you don't understand?

Any consent implied or given is rescinded.

After receiving a traffic ticket or summons

Send letter to man acting as cop asking forgiveness IF he has suffered due to your actions, and

offer to compensate for any loss. (that removes controversy)

Claim:

i, Ron, claim wrongdoers trespass against my property (Exhibit "A")

Cause of action:

There is no law that exists between i, and the wrongdoers.

99 | P a g e

The [wo]man acting in the capacity of prosecutor does move a false claim against i, a man, and

my person, into the public without joinder of parties.

Order:

I require the restoration of my good name and reputation, no later than March 28, 2015.

I will place a charge of $1,000.00 per day, per said trespasser, for any failure in the restoration on

said date.

If the restore of said property does occur on or before said date, I will forgive those who trespass

of their debt, as I would wish others to forgive me of my trespass.

(Hamburg case)

Claim:
 i, Ronald Karl Portz II, claim wrongdoers trespass against my property (see exhibit "A")

Cause of action:

There is no law that exists between i, and the wrongdoers.

The [wo]man acting in the capacity of prosecutor does move a false claim against i, a man, and

my person, into the public without joinder of parties.

Wrongdoers did take and carry away property (Exhibit "B")

Order:

I require the delivery of all said property, to the place of origin at 548 Glen Road Sparta, New

Jersey 07871, within and exclusively under my proper jurisdiction, no later than April 10, 2015.

I will place a charge of $1,000.00 per day, per said trespasser, for any failure in the restoration on

said date.

If the placement of all said property does occur on or before said date, I will forgive those who

trespass of their debt, as I would wish others to forgive me of my trespass.

Exhibit "A"'

i, Ronald Karl Portz II claim my reputation as my property. No [wo]man has interest, or higher

claim, to [my]property.[Cf. ..every Man has a Property in his own Person. This no Body has any Right to but

himself. The Labour of his Body, and the Work of his Hands, we may say, are properly his. .... The great and chief

end therefore, of Mens uniting into Commonwealths, and putting themselves under Government, is the

Preservation of their Property.-- John Locke, "A Treatise Concerning Civil Government"]

Exhibit "B"

(picture of truck)

The government and your kids If we have disputes between spouses and want to go to court, go

in as owners sharing the property that is our kid. When the state be our judge, we are in trouble. Be wary of

government benefit or help, there is no such thing as a free ride/free lunch etc. For those in this mess: “Thank you

guys but we got this settled on the private side and require immediate restoration of property.”
 Restoration of property (kids) “Are you threatening me? That if I don’t do something you say

you’ll keep me from my property by force? That’s extortion.” If someone wants u to sign something u don’t want

to then say “i want a billion dollars to sign that document” if u want me to carry out your orders to sign then i want

fair and just compensation…

In child cases…want u want to do is immediately find out who is in control of the baby…more

specifically ask who is responsible is my baby drowns in who is the baby care with? Are they liable? Who do i sue if

someone’s drowns my baby.. When u figure that out u say to that person “i WISH for the immediate return of my

property!” Then when they don’t comply you go file a claim against the person for trespass on your property by

way of robbery and there u go..dont put there gov title..just the mans name… Don’t refer to the property as child

kid baby offspring anything other than property the government won’t hear you…

147 | P a g e

When filing your claim for property(children), list it as exhibit a. and say i will bring a copy of

exhibit a and u will bring it tomorrow and i will make sure the other side gets a copy of it. That way the case can

get filed as a claim. They will insist it is a family court u say no where does it say i have to go to family court to

make a claim for my property.. they may want to define it as child i define it as property!! Now who is making a

claim court clerk? Are you making a claim or am i making a claim?

If clerk’s giving you trouble just mail it ..certified!!

Does filing a claim automatic evoke the common law and Queen’s Bench or is it only at certain

buildings?
 If we got a standing order for custody, and the other side wants to change it, just hold up the

contract and say….no thanks we don’t want to change it. “There is an outstanding order, at this time I do not wish

for any third party intervener to find, alter, or change the original order that was established in (insert divorce

date). At this time I do not find it to be beneficial for my person to alter or change or modify that order to

accommodate that person’s wishe/demand. The order stands as it was written.”

A writ of attachment or a writ of sequestration A writ of sequestration is a prejudgment process

which orders the seizure or attachment of property to be maintained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal or other

designated official, under court order and supervision, until the court determines otherwise. The purpose of the

writ is to preserve the named property pending outcome of the litigation. The order binds the property of the

defendant from the time it is issued. The writ of sequestration will lay out what specific powers have been given to

the sequestrators to enable them to carry out the sequestration.

writ of attachment

n. a court order directing a sheriff (or other law enforcement officer) to seize property of a

defendant which would satisfy a judgment against that defendant.

U can ask for this in case u gave child services a hard time and u fear they are going to put your

children in the worst home they can just for revenge.

You order not motion…for them to be moved to somewhere safe!!

Walk in with the rules previously noticed to everyone before the day u show up and take the left

side but say I am taking the left hand side table but i want at no time do you think that i am not prosecuting this

case my claim that that property is mine. Regardless of where i am seated if a proper doesn’t come forth before

this court by 10 am. The magistrate is to recognize and witness to the court clerk that she is to stamp our order

and deliver it upon us.

 Go to the sheriff and say we got an order..he will say that they need a writ of attachment or a

warrant in debt..

A warrant in debt is what they call it in Virginia when a creditor is suing you in General District

Court. Warrant makes it sound a little worse than it is, but it is bad enough. It is not a criminal law problem—you

can't go to jail; but they are trying to make you pay.

U may have to get a bond but simply go see a bondsman for the amount required and do it up!

148 | P a g e

When u show up to court one may find themselves saying this “excuse me did u not read rule 2.

That says if anybody has a claim that they should make sure that i get one as well as the magistrate..why am i not

getting a copy of the claim?? I am going to judge whether or not i share this property or not..

so whatever proposal is being thrown around u see it and find not to your liking…reply with “we

have reached an impass and now we have a matter of controversy that is going to be standing for all time between

us. W are going to have to move this before a trial by jury..does anybody have a problem being here same time

next week? If not then get a jury convened and get the show on the road?” does anybody object to that?”

u could hold trial at 3 am if u wanted too…but i say be nice…

notice

Rules of Court (it denotes the judges and staff have duties, responsibilities and obligations (not

rights) to you and you yourself)

One can be in contempt of one’s own court if we don’t follow our own rules!!

robin court (lower case to keep all your rights) (use your last name is suggested)

so …… mitchell court at the court of the queen’s bench of British Columbia (as they type is upper

lower case or whatever)

 one of the rules may be “we are accepting any and all claims to….”

Whomever has been assigned by the clerks court is to witness that no claims have come forth

and he or she is to bear witness and take my order and present it to the court clerk and have it file it and return it

to me that no claimant has come forth..

Now if the magistrate says they borught forth a clain …well then tell them to look at the rule that

says if so then proceed to trial by jury.. show them u know your rules!!!

-“I require that the law produce the following, the findings of facts and conclusions of law if you

believe the answer is yes to any of the following 1. is there a law that states there was nowhere in Canada for a

man or woman not fluent in legalese terms of your legal society to move a claim or evoke the right of trial by jury?

2. is there a law that a man or woman have to belong or hire a member of your legal society to move a claim? 3. Is

there a law preventing a man or a woman if they provides justification and or excuses for the robbery of another

man’s or woman’s property, to require that said robber to verify in living voice in open court what moves them to

rob said property and or have a lawyer testify on their behalf?

153 | P a g e

4. is there a law that states that the court clerk does not have to provide their oath of office or

their hazard or security bond policy number.. and that they have the right to practice law and read any man or

woman’s claim, to judge whether said man or woman has the right to press their claim in a public venue designe

for the use of any man or woman requiring justice and the immediate release, return and restoration of their

property?
 You may find yourself with the clerks offices rejecting your paperwork and sending it back…what

you do is mail it in using the post office with registered mail.. Get the post master or post mistress to date stamp

your documents… they should start accepting it as this is setting them up for mail fraud as none can interfere with

mail being delivered to your court…it is like an address..

The public statutes at large of the United States of America: from ..., Volume 4

277 | P a g e

The following year, 1775, Franklin was appointed by the Continental Congress as its first

Postmaster General, a position he served in until late in 1776 when Franklin was called upon to serve his country in

other ways.

The creation of the Post office occurs before the creation of the seat of the government, and is

placed in authority over the seat of government.

The Post Office and the International Postal Union

The role of the United States Post Office and the Universal Postal Union became a factor in our

lawsuits because of several bankruptcies that the United States has been through over the history of the country.

When one declares himself a bankrupt, that person is no longer legally competent to conduct his affairs. The court

becomes a fiduciary, and appoints a trustee to oversee the affairs of the bankrupt. It does not matter if the

bankrupt is a common man, or a nation; except that a nation still has a right to conduct war. Typically the average
person anywhere in the world thinks of their Postal System as a part of, and subservient to, their government.

However, the postal system in the United States has a different legal history than one would expect.

The Post Office and Judicial Courts were established before the seat of the Government. On

Thursday, Sept. 17, 1789 we find written, “Mr. Goodhue, for the committee appointed for the purpose, presented

a bill to amend part of the Tonnage act, which was read the first time. The bill sent from the Senate, for the

temporary establishment of the Post Office, was read the second and third time, and passed. The bill for

establishing the Judicial Courts . . . , for establishing the seat of government . . . ” 11[11] Other references to the

Post Office support my theory of the founding forefather’s views:

POST OFFICE

1. A place where letters are received to be sent to the persons to whom they, are addressed.

2. The post office establishment of the United States, is of the greatest importance to the people

and to the government. The constitution of the United States has invested congress with power to establish post

offices and post roads. Art. 1, s. 8, n. 7.

278 | P a g e

3. By virtue of this constitutional authority, congress passed several laws anterior to the third

day of March 1825, when an act, entitled "An act to reduce into one the several acts establishing and regulating

the post office department," was passed. 3 Story, U. S. 1825. It is thereby enacted, 1. That there be

established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under the direction of a

postmaster general. 12[12]

 We need to take notice where the commas are placed on that last sentence. “That there be

established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under the direction of a

postmaster general.” When I set off a clause with commas, I make sure that the sentence makes sense without

that clause. Taking out the setoff clause, we read . . . “the seat of the government of the United States under the

direction of a postmaster general.”

[11] Gales and Seaton’s History [H. of R.], p. 928.

[12] Bouvier, John. Law Dictionary. Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of The United States

of America And of the Several States of the American Union, With References to the Civil and Other Systems of

Foreign Law. In the Philadelphia, by theChilds & Peterson. (1856)

The creation of the Post office occurs before the creation of the seat of the government, and is

placed in authority over the seat of government. What is the effect of these legal techniques? The stated position

of an object and the sequence of events play an important role in the Universal-Legal-Technology. The effect is

that the Government’s later bankruptcies in 1859 and 1929 have no legal effect upon the solvent Post-Office. We

can make a case that the formation of the Post-Office before the formation of the government’s operations is a

stroke of dumb luck. Perhaps it is ingenious, since communication has a higher value than government itself. If any

government fails, the people still have a need to communicate with one another to form a new government. And

to this day, the Post-Office is still solvent and operational, ready to fulfill its duty to help the people in their

communications; to set a new government should a complete break down of the existing governmental structures

occur in the United States. Sounds like a very good back up plan.

The formation of the Universal Postal Union in 1874 has another legal effect that is very

important to the Universal-Legal-Technology. The Universal Postal Union unites member countries into a single,

worldwide postal territory. 13[13] We have already learned that any litigant is going into international jurisdiction

every time he goes to any court. Since the litigant needs to establish that his papers are official, he uses a
dollar???? postage stamp on the face of the first page. The stamps also invoke postal statutes and the Universal

Postal Union jurisdiction. Currently in the U. S., the stamp of choice is the “fox” (discontinued 22 April 2004 or

earlier) U. S. dollar postage stamp. The stamp is not drawn in a box, making the forty-five-degree lines

unnecessary. The litigant does, however, need to autograph across the stamp, then date the autograph, for two

reasons: to comply with postal regulations concerning private mail carriers, and to make a continuance of evidence

that the process (paper work) is mail. The continuation of evidence is less of a factor, since the definitions of “mail”

and “delivery” can include a clerk at a grocery store handing a customer a receipt for groceries. One can see that

Standaring had his shipping clerk wired with the Bill of Lading.

The legal writers were forced to make the definitions wide enough to encompass the private

rural carriers, and private advertisers that have placed advertisements on our doorsteps, or in our hands. I have

thought about this issue a lot, and I did not find any other better alternative. Any loophole would have devastated

many consumers, and caused a plethora of other laws to be enacted to cover the loophole.

Additionally, on the back of the first page, we authenticate the authority of the Post-Office with

an endorsement, and simultaneously authenticate our identity by placing a postage meter stamp, from a postage

meter machine that we have purchased in advance, on the lower quarter of the back of the first page. All

commercial papers have endorsements to authenticate their authenticity. Again, we autograph across the meter

stamp, and date. The postage meter stamp is better than a regular stamp, and stamps are said to have rendered

seals superfluous.

279 | P a g e

14[14] The purchase of a meter machine requires identification in case the meter machine is

tampered with or is stolen. The meter number on the meter stamp can be traced back to the owner (litigant), and

therefore authenticates the endorser better than any seal.

 What are we doing by placing our paper work into the jurisdiction of the Universal Postal Union?

To answer that question, we need to look at the structure and finance of that organization. The official aims and

purposes of the Universal Postal Union (UPU) are two: to form “a single postal territory for the reciprocal exchange

of correspondence”; and “to secure the organization and improvement of the postal services and to promote in

this sphere the development of international collaboration.” [15] “The organization of the circulation of the

international mail is based on the freedom of transit, . . . as a result, therefore, only by enduring absolute freedom

of transit can the effectual universality of the postal territory be attained. * * * Freedom of transit is guaranteed

throughout the entire territory of the union. Administrations may exchange, through the intermediary of one or

more of their number, both closed mails and open mail according to the needs of the traffic and the requirements

of the service.” 16[16]

“Starting in 1878, the union created a category for territories which were recognized as non

independent but which were given all the rights of union membership afforded to clearly independent countries.”

17[17] So the members of the union have been operating as sovereign, independent countries, and their currency

is based on the gold French Franc. Gold is the acceptable form of money in international jurisdictions, or paper

backed by gold. 18[18] When we purchase postal money orders, the money order is backed by gold, not the fiat

“money” called Federal Reserve Notes. The FRNs, as some call them, are based instead on a promise to pay a debt.

The debt is based only upon the “full faith and credit of the United States,” and lacks any intrinsic value.

“Some of the obligations in the convention can, in some states, be introduced into domestic

practice without involving a nation’s legislative process or without even reaching the desk of the chief executive.

19[19] The Union also “sets forth the principle that postal administrations are responsible for loss of, theft from, or

damage to, insured items, and then goes into detail about exceptions to the principle of responsibility, cessation of

responsibility, how the sender is indemnified, and the manner in which responsibility is apportioned between

postal administrations.” 20[20] “There was only one instance, according to the Belgium delegate, where the

bureau would have any power even approximating the right to intervene in the affairs of administrations, that is in

the arbitration of disputes, but in this instance the bureau could act only when requested to do so by an
administration.” 21[21] The Functions of the International Bureau for the Universal Postal Union include acting “as

a clearinghouse for information concerning postal matters. It also functions as a clearinghouse for international

postal accounts and as a conciliator and arbitrator in disputes over postal matters between administrations.”

22[22]

[13] 1997 Encyclopedia Britannica [14] Collon, Dominique, Editor. 7000 Years of Seals. In the

London, for the Trustees of the British Museum, by the BRITISH MUSEUM PRESS. 1997. p. 153. [15]

Universal Postal Union, p. 73. [16] Universal Postal Union, p. 74. [17] Universal Postal Union, p. 80. [18] The

backing of paper does not necessarily have to be gold, it can be anything real at market value like timber,

oil, minerals, metals, land, etc. [19] Universal Postal Union, p. 96. [20] Universal Postal Union, p. 103. [21]

Universal Postal Union, p. 186. [22] Universal Postal Union, p. 195

So, what we are doing, by placing the postage stamp on our admiralty paperwork and

endorsement on the back of the first page, is using the authority of the sovereignty of the longest surviving,

solvent, governmental authority in the United States. Through the admiralty, we are taking the Post-Office and the

judicial system back some two hundred years, and simultaneously creating a new territory with all the rights of

union membership afforded to

280 | P a g e

clearly independent countries. We are establishing the laws in this new territory with the paper

work that we have filed. As we will see later, we are also correcting the errors of the founding forefathers; in that

we are also bringing the equal rights that they neglected to give to all the people in the United States. We are

eliminating all of the legal deficiencies that handicap the sovereign status of us, the people, within the court. We

are guaranteed that all of the parties in the case: the clerk, judge, bailiff, and litigants have the freedom of transit

in the admiralty court. If the clerk, judge, or other official fails to deliver our documents as directed, or delay them,

or obstruct them, that person is faced with several penalties within the postal statutes and admiralty statutes. The
final advantage is that if we are obstructed, because of the transitory nature of the action, we are in the admiralty

and can take the case offshore for adjudication in any court in the world.

By getting the post office to timestamp your paperwork your are putting under their jurisdicition

which pre dates the constitution… which places it under common law…(this is what a man has to do on America at

the united states courts because America was founded by british colonist who were practicing common law…

hence invoking common law with the post offices jurisdictional power reinforces your position…sometimes the

only way of getting your mail to your court It’s a felony to interrupt the service of mail…the clerks no better

bill of lading--- and officially way of doing this, is with the county recorders office and get a

certified copy of your paperwork. This makes your paperwork the vessel and the content becomes the cargo. And

the county recorder office acts as the customs office for the ship… This is a fantastic way of stablish the common

law jurisdiction..

Go to the head clerk and simply ask isn’t it obstruction the delivery of mail whne i am trying to

delivery mail to the “Mitchell” court? …remember you are not delivering mail to their court your delivery mail to

your court…

Just make it clear you are delivering mail to your court not their court..what authority do they

have to obstruct paid mail from being delivered to your court from the post office not the us postal service ? do i

have to report this fraudulent activity to the post inspector/ post master?

Only one form refers to the post office and that is registered mail. Registered mail is always held

under lock and key. And it’s not more expensive than express mail..it’s about $12 (2015) and u can go back 3 days

later and get a certified log of everyone who’s hand has touched that piece of mail Watch out for them setting up

parallel court “in” their court not ”in” your court at their building.. your case is your property because u paid for it..
if they cross those line make sure u put in a notice of property and trespass if they want to interfere with your

case..

after you serve someone u have to waits 21 days for them to answer your claim or else there

room left for a court date after that.. make sure u fill the copies of it into the case.. and then give them notice that

the man or woman has been served to the satisfaction of the “mithcell” court. ( u should get a affidavit of service

form the process server)..

After you have gotten the affidavit of service from the process server write a letter to the clerk….

Greetings Luanne(process servor name),

I require you to record in case ######### the affidavit of service served upon bob richards(whom

evre it was u served) . please know that the man has been served according to the requiremetns of the

Mitchell(your court’s name) court. I now require u to set a trial date (make sure that the date aksed for is 21days

after the date u served the man) and is she has any questions to please first check with your first chief judge and

he doesn’t satisfy your curiosity i will be glad to help you out..

cheers,

281 | P a g e

robin

if 21 days passes and they man doesn’t answer the claim let the clerk know in writting that you

have the right to have a final decision and that u will not settle for a default judgemnet and that they should issue

a warrant or a capiuos and have the man brought in to answer this claim…he has to be given due procress which is

the opportunity to answer the claim before the court….

 look at karl’s interference notice when anyone messes with your case.

if someone is interfering with your case( an attorney general protection his minions)ask them if

they have any first hand knowledge of the case? Well thank god and we don’t need any more input form you

then.. good day

Or tell them that if they continue you will benefit them with their own case.

You want to let them know as you go who you are and what the rules are as they break them not

sending a million notices which are basically warnings before someone has done anything wrong can be a little off

putting… like waring people of steeping on your toes before anyone has stepped on your toe!

Appoint your court a clerk and then ask her to recommend 3 judges for their ability to discern

common law and experience in common law… (this lets them know u are going to have a common law case)

Look at filing notices (karls has great ones) for jurisdiction, notice of venue at there vs in,

not sure how to get warrants and force them to drag people into courts!!!

cant one just get a default judgement take your win and get a sheriff to collect.. this will force the

man or woman out to defend themselves which means u have them dead center or they just allow u to do things

like getting the sheriff to till tip!!??

 Whne they do it to use there is a court form that they fill out that says under penalty of perjury

that what is being requested..the arrest is true and relative….. Makes sure u have a notice of interference in your

case because of its broad application. And then make a notice much like the above during the administrative side

when they are dragging you into court…

read how they do their arrest… just to mirror but in a way that doesn’t jeopardize the common

law case..

Notice of property in your case..”this case and all of its contents are solely my property..cf.[a bill

of lading]” thye can not interfeer with the shipment of cargo…. Just like they cant touch your property…

Get the judge to put their order in writing and sign it

Do not contract…say u don’t understand anything in a court room. They may try a trick question:

is it u don’t understand or don’t agree? U say i don’t understand and i don’t agree is the proper answer to their

false choice question

282 | P a g e

U can call the clerk’s office to see with your case file number what order a judge has executed in

whatever hearing or place in time when it occurred or not ….

 If u hold your ground and never agree to anything u will be surprised how little power they

have…

that is why they always want you to accept the name.. because if u accept the name you accept

the office if u accept the office u become a trustee.. what does a trustee do? They have duties and obligations

a judge is a judge of person within her authority and capacity and dominion over but they have

no dominion over man. Only god is our judge.. a your blood is your creation hence your property.. so if a judge is

tell you to do something with your property [child] u ask the judge “ our you administrating my property?” if the

judge says yes , then tell him to put it in writing and sign it…. And when you see your child next time and u have to

leave the scene.. send the judge a bill for complying with his order because u will write him “i saw my property

[you know her as my daughter] and stayed away form her.. here is a bill for $1000,000 for following your orders

judges are very aware specially in bc.. if you place and order like to reappear and u get it in

writing and signed by the judge and u reappear, well then u can give the judge a bill ..

ask a jugde to give u and order (remember its not your judge) as a man to man or woman to

woman and say give me a signed order so i can provide a service… if the judge ordered 300 hundred pizza he is

liable for it!! If a judge refuses to pay then demand a hearing over the matter…

When u step into the public its all based on contract and breach of contract do u have jurisdiction

and authority over me? Do we have joinder? Yes or no? and money gets exchanged boom it’s done…
 Sneak their official form into you claim as one of your exhibits blank And when the clerk say it

needs to be filled out you point to the sign on the desk that says you cant give legal advice and ask are u giving me

legal advice? Should poop a pickle!! If the clerk was right then the judge will throw it out when he sees it and the

courts just ate my money..so i will take that chance!! File on demand if you have to

In the event a Sonoma County clerk determines that a document should not be filed for any

reason, he/she shall advise the person attempting to file the document of that reason. If the proffered document is

a pleading prepared by a party, the attorney of record or person proceeding in propria persona attempting to file

the document may then request the document be “filed on demand,” in which case the document shall be

accepted for filing and will be stamped “Filed on Demand”. This policy does not apply to documents which a party

requests the Clerk to issue (e.g. Writs, Summons, Abstracts); in such circumstances, the Clerk will require

compliance with applicable statutes.

Judge ask u if your name is john doe You say pardon me? I cant understand He asks again U again

still can’t understand looking puzzled Could you write the name down? The judge writes the name down( it will be

in all caps) U say “I'm not the author of that name”

Bring the law into the court, Queens Bench, and being placed in a dock

I need to see the enrolled law brought in and they will have to unroll the law and read into the

court... and then you are going to ask where are you expressly written into it….and show me where i am bound

and where i am a signatory …..or show me where my representative signed on my behalf.. or show me where i am

defined in that law..because i believe ur in error!!

Bring ur case at queen bench not in…watch out for queen bench division..not the same…
 Queens bench is hidden so its gonna take some searching around..

U want ot placed in the dock because that is where man needs to go to be protected from the

retorique. The place and surround u with a curtain and they talk about your person so be happy…in Canada it’s a

partial dock it doesn’t go all the way to the ceiling..

- Objecting in statutory court creates joinder

Objecting in statutory is like saying u understand enough to reject the idea!! Require leave of

court and file a claim. You can’t react to the other side you can’t show any level of understanding..put on your idiot

hat!!!

Changing your complaint in to a claim

Let your complaint die..dismiss it and let it sit there forever and die of natural cause and file a

claim..

12b6 is when the other side answer you! If the other side hasn’t answered u then all he has is a

case number so let it die..

291 | P a g e

Now if they haven’t yet..just go to the clerk with your case number and tell them that nobody

has answered yet to you and you want to amend the claim y striking everything off the case number and placing

your claim in it. Lucky…

 But if they have already answered you have to beg them to amend it ……gulp!!

If you ask everyone one of the people “do you believe i broke the law?” and they all answer yes

they are now evoking the common law because only a man can make a claim or have a belief..and when u ask to

see that claim and they can’t produce it…u have them all under oath or affirmation making a false claim. Everyone

is liable for committing perjury!!”

“Ignorance of the law is no excuse, if he orders another man to do something he has to pay the

bill” They assumed it!! Not presumed it… but none of this applies unless u first establish that u are a man in that

court and have filed a proper claim in a superior court of record and common law!!

Back off from their frivolous claim or their will be a demand for compensation

Keep ur claim short and sweet don’t explain the situation as the correspondence between the

two of you will be evidence it… they won’t be playing stupid….remember include the correspondence as exibit a,

b,c and so on..

If they want a bill of particulars then u may give it or u may just say u know and i know what u

did, i will see u in court in front of the jury..

Every court is a court of record, traffic, probate, maritime, admiralty, natural, absolute etc. We

must say “IN this court of record AT common law.” Or “law; common”
 Laws are just customs and practices of the people, when we go to “traffic” court, we’re in their

customs. When we file a claim, we are bringing our own law our own customs.

We must expressely say we are in common law. “I believe that I’m in a court of record and it’s

my belief that it operates under common law, see exhibit A [blacks law]”

Say u have an administrative court in session like a ticket at court tell them your court ie mitchell

court has just been made aware that it is being challenged and require leave of court for 30 days so as to file my

own claim in a court of record so as to properly heard before the court about the matter. after u filed you claim

and served whomever ask the court to join the cases the superior and inferior courts and suspend the inferior

court until the superior court has rendered its decision?

“Every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has a right to, but himself.” John Locke

Does anyone else has right to that property is what it boils down to!!

None is going to more for your child than you..period.. so u don’t need the help!!

So after you filed your claim and have your court Send a notice tell them the robin court will be

holding a preliminary hearing for the return of the property; if there are any claims that come forward the trial by

jury date will be set one week from now…and if none comes forward this man in the black robe before us or a

representative of this venue or whomever the clerk assigns to sit before us; they will serve as witness that if

nobody comes forward that they are to take my order for the property of 1 2 3 4 also known as children are to
returned to its original place of origin and proper jurisdiction by 1am you take that order stamped and signed and

take it to the sheriff and u say help me regain my property please

299 | P a g e

- You choose when to move your case, and the state will try every dirty trick

When one has established themselves “IN” their own common law court at queen bench with

you own claim…ie. the robin court. It means ur are the queen moving her court at her wishes.. so if you need to

postpone events feel free and take no guff about how the court won’t be pleased as it’s is not their court it’s your

court and robin gets to say who is pleased and who isn’t pleased.

You reply “thank you we will take that under royal advisement (whatever they say ) under

consideration and the court is not amused with its need to change property to child because when i say something

is mine ITS MINE i am the royal before the court” which means you are not confused y there misdirection bs and

will send a real strong message that they are in front of royalty… but if you change your story then you ARE NOT

THE ROYAL BUT AN IMPOSTER”

Note: when u appear at court in your court it makes the public officials stand on edge as you are

like the queen herself showing up… so don’t be surprised when the top dog shows up talk to them (their best

judge)… but the rest of the lawyers and the judges are freaking out because they are wondering how did the queen

get out of her tower in London…..she is here but we would like to get her back to the tower in London….they want

to gently back her up the stairs into the tower and shut her there but we don’t want to piss her off because she

might be the queen with a little amniesia.. but if they move you to the wrong side of the court they will eat u

alive…don’t play ball with the devil NO BARGAINS!!

 Consent decree: A consent decree is an agreement or settlement to resolve a dispute between

two parties without admission of guilt (in a criminal case) or liability (in a civil case) and most often refers to such a

type of settlement in the United States.

Do not go for the consent decree!!

Provost Marshall and how to use them to get in and out of a state??

A license doesn't negate a trial by jury, and stick to what you say in court Priviliges don’t negate

rights…just because i have a marriage (privilege) contract doesn’t mean i have lost the right to a trial by jury in this

matter of controversy (whatever it may be)

There are many layers to marriage..there is the common law side , the church side, civil layer of

marriage. A judge may only be addressing the civil side of the matter until you evoke the common law!!

After you filed your claim as a prosecutor say “ i robin and my case are now at court. I now

present i and my case to court(don’t forget this presentment)” don’t take judges offer for a free lawyer just repeat

yourself!! By doing this one is showing it is etched in stone..one is making their bond ..one’s giving their word… not

one word is being taken away and not one word is added(bible)

U may have to do this a thousand times!! In biblical times if u changed your word you were

killed!! Sometime u have a bond just for the case , just in case there is a false claim before the court..

OJ Simpson could have asked for a bond of $15million dollars be put up just in case this is a false

claim ( as his verdict would have shown) and he would have been able to recoup his losses..
 Opening a common law court by writing a letter

300 | P a g e

Where’s your legal bases?’

“we apologize for any confusion, as the aggrieved, our lawful basis is that we require the use of

this venue as a court of record to seat a jury in which we move our claim before, also to determine and render a

verdict as to who has the lawful right to tender the order to administrate our property?

Priviliges don’t negate rights…just because i have a marriage (privilege) contract doesn’t mean i

have lost the right to a trial by jury in this matter of controversy (whatever it may be)

There are many layers to marriage..there is the common law side , the church side, civil layer of

marriage. A judge may only be addressing the civil side of the matter until you evoke the common law!!

After you filed your claim as a prosecutor say “ i robin and my case are now at court. I now

present i and my case to court(don’t forget this presentment)” don’t take judges offer for a free lawyer just repeat

yourself!! By doing this one is showing it is etched in stone..one is making their bond ..one’s giving their word… not

one word is being taken away and not one word is added(bible)

U may have to do this a thousand times!! In biblical times if u changed your word you were

killed!! Sometime u have a bond just for the case , just in case there is a false claim before the court..

OJ Simpson could have asked for a bond of $15million dollars be put up just in case this is a false

claim ( as his verdict would have shown) and he would have been able to recoup his losses..

The one bringing the controversy into the court will lose
 If at the time u can’t afford to pay any more than say $30 on a $50 monthly/payment and they

credit card company or whomever it is they have brought controversy and the moment they bring it in to a court

room they are going to lose..they should have accepted the best they can do…..

If any man believes they have a claim on my property, let them come forward with their claim

now or forever hold their peace.

Try to get our claim under one sentence.

Avoid “jury trial”, go for “trial by jury”

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of

trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the

United States, than according to the rules of the common law.[2]

JURY TRIAL A jury trial or trial by jury is a legal proceeding in which a jury either makes a

decision or makes findings of fact, which then direct the actions of a judge. It is distinguished from a bench trial, in

which a judge or panel of judges make all decisions. Jury trials are used in a significant share of serious criminal

cases in almost all common law legal systems,[1] and juries or lay judges have been incorporated into the legal

systems of many civil law countries for criminal cases. Only the United States and Canada make routine use of jury

trials in a wide variety of non-criminal cases. Other common law legal jurisdictions use jury trials only in a very

select class of cases that make up a tiny share of the overall civil docket (e.g. defamation suits in England and

Wales), while true civil jury trials are almost entirely

301 | P a g e
 absent elsewhere in the world. Some civil law jurisdictions do, however, have arbitration panels

where non-legally trained members decide cases in select subject-matter areas relevant to the arbitration panel

members' areas of expertise. The availability of a trial by jury in American jurisdictions varies. Because the

United States system separated from that of the English at the time of the American Revolution, the types of

proceedings that use juries depends on whether such cases were tried by jury under English common law at that

time, rather than the methods used in English or UK courts in the present. For example, at the time English "courts

of law" tried cases of torts or private law for monetary damages but "courts of equity" tried civil cases seeking an

injunction or another form of nonmonetary relief. As a result, this practice continues in American civil laws, even

though in modern English law only criminal proceedings and some inquests are likely to be heard by a jury.

Counter-claim puts us back into their system as defendant, always only file claims. Never be a

plaintiff, never accept the title of plaintiff, only be a man, wronged, aggrieved party. Plaintiff puts us under the

administrative jurisdiction. Never be “pro se”, pro se means you agree to adhere to all their federal court rules

and regulations If they file paper work with us under these unwanted titles, we file paperwork objecting to that

title, to cease and desist as we find it offensive and harmful to I a man and my person. We bring that statutory case

over to the common law court and keep it there and we are going to resist every temptation every bribe and every

threat from everybody in the system will continue to insist on, and if they do, we are going to offer them to pay

the man a lot of money in compensation if they continue with that game. “cease and desist OR ELSE”

Chief magistrate is the highest officer in the courthouse holding the bond for the entire building

and its operations and everyone hired there; and the court clerk is the highest of the clerks of the courthouse;

both these people must be informed before we put in any claims into the public. Because they are there to protect

us and we must exhaust all private avenues before we can bring the matter into open court.

“hey BOB, aka chief magistrate, If you do not control, train, monitor, and discipline your

subordinates, I’m going to have to add you to my suit”

 Holding the officer, attorney, and judge liable for making a false claim against you Don’t say we

didn’t break the code. Just say we have no contract with the state, hence there is no broken contract when we

disobey the code. Common law must only demonstrate one thing: harmed or injured party or breeched contract.

There is no code or statute in common law.

“hey Bob (judge), Do you know the difference between legal and lawful? You do? Then dismiss

the jury because I don’t need one. If you’re competent in law, I’ll take your word on it. I never sat down, I’m still

standing in common law. And I never relinquished control this court to anybody, and if you believe I did, I’ll appeal

it, and I’ll be back in 30 days. Or you can let me present the law to the court. Case dismissed? No discharged!

Dismissed means you can bundle it up and use it as a securitized instrument to collect and trade on the open

market, to help benefit the county and generate funds, that’s fine but no one better drag me back into this court

again ever, under that ticket under that claim.”

“judge BOB do you believe that I broke the law? Lawyer/prosecutor BOB, do you believe?” ok

now we just unshielded these men from their persons, they are now liable as men holding beliefs that we broke

the law.

Don’t let a judge/officer presume that we are citizen/resident. “are you going to testify under

oath/affirmation in open court that I’m a citizen and resident?”

302 | P a g e

A judge will never be able to verify that I am a resident or that I’m in the capacity of a citizen.
 If we actually owe a debt, and we leave the court losing, then to stay honorable we must try to

settle with the man we owe a debt to, with a payment plan of our own.

When judges/lawyers/attorneys try to play word games and try to move our claim into inferior

courts: “He uttered a forged instrument which has interfered with my right to property”

Common law court scenario: Judge: what are you here about? Us: (restate our claim as we have

written in the filed claim, verify exactly word-for-word what was on our claim) Otherside: legalese blah blah blah

Us: He uttered a forged instrument which has interfered with my right to property Otherside: we didn’t utter a

forged instrument Judge to all of us: would you like to stand on your positions? Us: this is my claim, it’s my law

before the court, the court’s to determine whether my law’s good law; not anybody else’s law, you can’t bring that

code nonsense in here, that’s not what’s before the court at this time, not his interpretation, this is what I say the

law is. He interfered with my right under this law. All he has to say is did he or did he not trespass against I a man.

(On my claim’s front cover is: Trespass: forgery Verified claim. That man created a false

document i.e. ticket, that led to I a man’s harm. At the beginning of the doc: I verify all here to be true. At the

bottom of the doc: verifiable claim.) Certification is a way to skirting liability, it’s lawyer trick. Certified means no

liability. Verified means liability. We want liability.

Attorneys are not competent to testify. We are incompetent in administrative court. When they

send us for a psychological evaluation, the ironic thing is that the very psychologists they send us to will not be

able to determine our legal competency that the court is looking for. It’s a baseless request. “What are you trying

to ascertain with this competency evaluation? If it’s my legal competency, how can a psychologist who has no legal

training make this determination? What law say I a man must be legally competent?”

“sorry for any inconvenience, but I’m incompetent to engage in any intercourse in commerce

with you folks. I’m just not competent to enter into such a foreign agreement. I don’t even know who created this
code statute stuff, I don’t understand it, I don’t comprehend it, I’m not party to it. I cannot accept this wonderful

benefit of this gift at this time, because it’s going to cause me harm.” (not understanding it, not comprehending it,

protects us from being held under their codes) “government was created by man and is supposed to be of benefit

to man, and not cause man harm. Thank you for your gift, and I accepted it at the time believing that it would be of

benefit, but now I realize it’s causing me harm. So please kind person on the other end of this letter, kindly take

back your gift”

If they some nonsense about we don’t do common law courts and it doesn’t no longer exist.

Reply with “When did we become me? We is not me and when did they outlaw the common law

and i need you to show me..i hear u saying we don’t do common law anymore but can u show me… (they may

show u a code)

Respond with that’s a code ..when did u throw away YOUR constitution? Because it clearly says

in your contract between the governments that they will not interfere with the rights of man… and if anyone

interferes with their rights that they have the right to sue the wrong doer.

Amendment VII(7)

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of

trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United

States, than according to the rules of the common law.

We are not a party to it because once u sign a contract u relinquish certain rights for privileges..

so i don’t want a privilege from anyone as it interferes with my rights as a man..

If they don’t show up it’s a nihil dicit judgement as u get to face your accuser in a common law

court of record..
 If we’re the prosecutor, they need to just answer to us, because it’s our court, our rules. They

want to ask questions? Get their own claim and their own court. No claim against me? My court, my rules.

Case. We determine what’s in our case, how to set it up, what the rules are. The defendant is just

one piece of our case.

“Is there a verifiable criminal complaint against me? are you not going to bring the witness? Is

anyone going to be testifying? No? then I’m filing a claim against you, because you’re saying that I’ve done

wrong/I’ve committed crime, but not bringing any injured party to court. To move court you must have a plaintiff,

and the plaintiff must appear in open court. His attorney can be there but the plaintiff MUST be there. so you’re

filing a false claim, and what you wished executed on your brother will now fall on you.”

“if a plaintiff shows up and testify under oath or affirmation that I’ve done him harm, I’ll

compensate him right now.”

No matter who charges us, never come into court as a defendant unless we’ve harmed an actual

man or woman.

Nihil dicit is Latin for "he says nothing"; a judgment for want of a plea. The name of a judgment

which a judge may render against a defendant who failed to plead and failed to answer a plaintiff's declaration or

complaint within the prescribed time limit. The defendant failed to say why the court should not issue the

judgment against him.

307 | P a g e

The failure to say constitutes an admission of the justice of the cause of action against the

defendant; it does so more strongly than a mere default.

You would be held liable to the judgment terms as if you did not appear in court and the

plaintiff/prosecution receives whatever you're seeking from the Judge.

 Blackstones commentary PRIVATE WRONGS. BOOK III. Ch. 23. But in both these instances the

jury may, if they thing proper, take upon themselves to determine at their own hazard, the complicated question

of fact and law; and, without either special verdict or special case, may find a verdict absolutely either for the

plaintiff or defendant.

Queen’s bench are courts of record. 1) generally has a seal 2) has power to fine or imprison for

contempt 3) keeps a permanent record of the proceedings 4) proceeds according to the common law (not statutes

or codes) 5) has a tribunal which is independent of the magistrate (judge)

there is no vs., because he’s not a defendant, he’s a wrong-doer. We are the aggrieved party

prosecutor. A man, (name) prosecutor | robert benton , chairman of the DHR, a public servant, a man, a wrong-

doer I’m not fighting the man, I’m just making a claim because I’ve been wronged and I require compensation. I’m

not fighting, I’m not bringing a controversy into this court or public. I’m saying I want compensation for I believe

I’ve been done wrong by these people. If they want to come forward and say I’m making a false claim let them

come forward. Prosecutor just means I’m pursuing. I hope you don’t answer my claim because I’ll just get a “nihil

dicit” (he says nothing) judgement against you. (note: we are not using the latin here, the judge will just call it

that). More powerful than a default judgment.

No notice of court, no judicial notice, just “notice”

The state cannot take your kids without proper adjudication and a court order Attorney general

states that the state of Alabama has no right to take any child within its borders into its custody, the only children

they have control over are those who have been adjudicated in their care.

“Do you have a court order?” no they only have a complaint.

 If you accept a lower monetary counter offer, your case will be dismissed We’re suing someone

for 10mil, and they offer us 1mil, we conditionally accept your offer of 1mil dollars but that does not negate the

fact that there’s still an outstanding balance between us. If we accept their lower offer unconditionally, our original

claim of 10mil is a false claim.

Attorneys try to play the word “reasonable”. If lawyers get us to change our claim by 1mm or 1

minute, our claim becomes untrue. That is my word and I am sticking to it. Jacob’s father blessed him and did not

go back on his word, even though he meant to bless his other son.

308 | P a g e

My claim stands true until another man can come forth with a verifiable claim that I filed a false

claim. I shall not be moved. That’s my word and I’m sticking to it.

When you say it’s the “order of court”, “court” means the jury+the plaintiff+defendant, not the

judge. No “a”, “the”, “this” court, just “court”. AT the STATE OF ALABAMA’s court case stylized as JU2001832 to be

known to the world as void from the beginning (stay away from “ab initio”, it’s latin/legalese) and all of its

subsequent orders ought to have no force of operation.

Don’t use “pro se”, we are not “pro se”, it is legalese. I’m just an aggrieved man. AGGRIE'VED,

participle passive Pained; afflicted, civilly or politically oppressed. Don’t use “deemed”, that’s legalese.

Obtaining the facts and evidence from the other side before trial If we are denied access to

evidence/casefile. We’re trying to get discovery and lawyers are blocking us. They might say they don’t give
evidence until day of trial. This is not true. Don’t let them make us assume this. Some lawyers won’t even prepare

a casefile against us (lazy), presuming that we’ll get a lawyer or be appointed one and be sold out.

“I need to see the evidence in order to prepare proper defense and to obtain competent council.

I will also not intercourse in a trial by ambush.” Whenever we talk to a person we should also put it in writing.

(notice) “how am I to obtain competent legal counsel unless they know how to set a retaining fee? He needs to

know what you folks are going to present to the court so he can set a fee.”

Don’t actually get a lawyer, but this is a way to delay the trial or get the file ordered from the

court from the guy in the black robe, then the judge will write the plaintiff and order them to give him their whole

case. Then he’ll have jurisdiction and control over the state’s claim. Then judge BOB will write us and tell us that

he’s got the copy of casefiles.

“i require discovery” lady says we call it disclosure not discovery, follow the rules “notice to order

full disclosure [cf. motion for discovery]”

Plaintiff makes claim in his court, then he turns his claim over to THE court, and argue his case

before THE court against the wrong-doer, then THE court decides.

'ARGUE, verb intransitive [Latin arguo, to show, argue accuse or convict.]

1. To reason; to invent and offer reasons to support or overthrow a proposition, opinion or

measure; as, A argues in favor of a measure; B argues against it.

2. To dispute; to reason with; followed by with; as, you may argue with your friend, a week,

without convincing him.

'ARGUE, verb transitive

 1. To debate or discuss; to treat by reasoning; as, the counsel argued the cause before the

supreme court; the cause was well argued.

2. To prove or evince; to manifest by inference or deduction; or to show reasons for; as, the

order visible in the universe argues a divine cause.

3. To persuade by reasons; as, to argue a man into a different opinion.

309 | P a g e

4. Formerly, to accuse or charge with; a Latin sense, now obsolete; as, to argue one of

profaneness.

We go to court to argue our case. Do not go to “small claims court”, it diminishes the capacity of

our court. Always be in our common law court of record at queen’s bench.

It is my wish not to film anything other than my courtroom proceeding..this is tot avoid them

telling u what u cant film so as to not look complying …

Kalr likes to hide his rules in notices Ie.. notice this is what i consider jurisdiction Notice this

is what i consider the venue ….ths what i consider is the plaintiff, defendant, respondant The notices are the rulez

…sneaky

Nobody objected to the notices

Nobody should refer to me as a plaintiff will be in contempt of my court, as i am a claimant under

my court!! Because in my court my name is defined as claimant.. u cant call me anything else as i am clearly

defined in my court!!

A plaintiff in French is a nagging

 plaintiff (n.)

c. 1400, from Anglo-French pleintif (late 13c.), noun use of Old French plaintif "complaining;

wretched, miserable,"

tell the judge calling u plaintiff as this is like calling you names and ur insulted..i am not wretched

and that i a man find this highly insult and u will be in contempt of court.

Warn the prosecutor too.. that by pursuing this falling claim you are wasting and trying tto harm

me a man and that he should cease and decist before you have to file a claim against him too..

If the state is placing charges against i a man then go to the head prosecutor and send it to

states attourney general “i believe there is a state procesutor assistant the attouirney general who is going to be

prosecuting this case, in a ____(insert whatever court you’ll be at).. i believe he is moving in eror..i am giving you

fair warning for him to cease and desist or i am going to have to file a claim on my own…”

Legalese definition of "suffer" Means u accetted it and allowed it to happen.. u had all the ability

to stop him and u didn’t Stay away from this word.. don’t say u suffered at the hands of the police!!we did not

accept and do nothing to protect ourselves from the police beating !!

Suffer

SUF'FER, verb transitive [Latin suffero; sub, under, and fero, to bear; as we say, to undergo.]

1. To feel or bear what is painful, disagreeable or distressing, either to the body or mind; to

undergo. We suffer pain of body; we suffer grief of mind. The criminal suffers punishment; the sinner suffers the

pangs of

310 | P a g e
 conscience in this life, and is condemned to suffer the wrath of an offended God. We often

sufferwrong; we suffer abuse; we suffer injustice.

2. To endure; to support; to sustain; not to sink under.

Our spirit and strength entire,

Strongly to suffer and support our pains.

3. To allow; to permit; not to forbid or hinder. Will you suffer yourself to be insulted?

I suffer them to enter and possess.

Thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbor, and not suffer sin upon him. Lex.19.

4. To undergo; to be affected by. Substances suffer an entire change by the action of fire, or by

entering into new combinations.

5. To sustain; to be affected by; as, to suffer loss or damage.

SUF'FER, verb intransitive To feel or undergo pain of body or mind; to bear what is inconvenient.

We suffer with pain, sickness or sorrow. We suffer with anxiety. We suffer by evils past and by anticipating others

to come. We sufferfrom fear and from disappointed hopes.

1. To undergo, as punishment.

The father was first condemned to suffer on a day appointed, and the son afterwards, the day

following.

2. To be injured; to sustain loss or damage. A building suffers for want of seasonable repairs. It is

just that we should suffer for neglect of duty.

Public business suffers by private infirmities.

Be prepared this is a life style…a mind set..the judge is really going to test your metal!!! Be

ready!!!

108 - Want vs. require in court

 I judge may like to slip this word in to gain jurisdiction..”do you WANT me to call u a witness?” if

one says “yes” u just said he is your daddy because no man wants for anything god provides for all!!! U REQUIRE

he bring s the witness to the stand as he is your servant!!! Not the other way around!! Forgetting the judge works

for u coulkd be costly!!!

This man works for you DON’T FORGET IT!!!

Sorry, I'm from a foreign culture We may come from a foreign culture where our behavior is

acceptable there but not here, once we discover this, we ask for forgiveness and that should be all we need to

avoid criminal charges. It’s like the African guy who impregnates his 8 year old niece, gets off free because it’s a

beautiful thing in his culture.

- Answer the second dimension with the second dimension Because our birth certificate is the 2D

entity they’re really after (it’s the security interest instrument) so they can actually take their charges out of that

certificate. (as a last resort) the 2D requires a 2D response, so we respond in writing.

Your confession grants jurisdiction

311 | P a g e

When judge talks fast at us saying “do you understand you’re waiving your rights when you

sign…………when you……….etc”, we say “I don’t understand anything of this legalese you’re saying nor can I be

compelled to. I’m just here to settle any verifiable true debt or claim against me, and to ask forgiveness of any man

or woman I may have harmed. Who is my accuser so I may face them?”

“who say I do wrong?”

 “are you telling me that 18kg of cocaine in my back trunk is wrong? BOB? If that’s your belief

then I require you to put it in writing and sign your name that I did wrong, and then I’ll sign my name after that.”

(non assumpsit)

Don’t let judges funnel us into saying we do wrong (when no one’s harmed.)

Reducing your public defender's role to that of co council Don’t get rid of a public defender,

reduce them to co council instead and we’ll speak for ourselves. Co councils are a great asset, tell whoever’s

moving the case on us (the prosecutor) that we’re going to take our attorney that they gave us and make him our

co-council, so that way he can’t enter contracts without our consent. He can just sit there and translate the

legalese for us. “Ok you just sit there behind me and when I need you I’ll let you know, I don’t require for anyone

to act on my behalf. I can do this all on my own, but thank you for giving me this public defender, but now I’m

going to reduce his role to that of a co council.”

When in arraignment: we’re looking for a claim, for injured parties, for damages, for anybody

who wants to say that I’ve done something wrong, I’m here to settle any verifiable true debt. We do this in writing,

not with your mouth.

Your right to cross examine your accuser I don’t believe any man or woman in this court has

jurisdiction or control over me; And I don’t believe I’ve harmed any man or woman in this court room; I don’t

believe I’ve injured any man or woman’s property in this court room; and I don’t believe I’ve lie to any man or

woman in this courtroom (breach of contract); so I don’t believe anyone has a claim that I’ve done anybody in this
courtroom wrong; if any man or woman steps forward with a proper verifiable true claim I will be happy to

compensate them;

If the prosecutor says the plaintiff is the STATE OF ALABAMA, then the STATE OF ALABAMA must

appear, so that I can cross examine my accuser.

Remember a trial by jury doesn’t allow a compliant to be heard by the jury…so the prosecution

has his hands tide. If u don’t open ur own case all u will be doing is saying their case sucks…DON’T!!! that’s just

rude…Just show your case has merit not there by bringing your own case before the court… then ur not saying

anything bad about their case…

How to deal with a psych evaluation

If a judge ask u to take a psych evaluation Write the judge to explain why he wants the psych eval

done is it to 1. Determine whether i am competent to answer question in court in legalese 2. Or that i your trying

to deduce that i am delusional or psychotic or psychiatric in nature? Please tell me what the concerns or

information you are tyring to gather about my mental state? and what are u trying to derive from the psych eval?

What is the benefit for me or the court? is this an order and if so am i going to be compensated for carrying it out?

312 | P a g e

If the court request anything from you find out is it an order and r going to be compensated for it

and what is the benefit for me and them and what are they trying to accomplish with it?

Remember no man can order another man around without compensation as slavery is not

allowed..
 Providing a product holds you liable Take donations to avoid liability as its more a kin to a

prayer.. if your prayer doesn’t work oh well!! Churches take donations…wink wink

Filing a claim against a complaint Make sure when u file your claim you have to make sure you

served the side properly after that you take the evidence that you served then properly and give it to the clerk for

the judge to create a case file number for you so that your court is there trumping their court. U are setting it up

so both courts are there to be heard at the same time? Just showing at the trial without proper notice, 21 days

before they appear to answer for themselves in open court filing a claim on the spot is considered ambushing your

opponent.. give proper notice..

don’t file counter claim or counter complaints you are filing a claim against their complaint.. if

somebody is complaining that i do wrong to a man or woman..i am filing a claim that they are filing a false

complaint and that theya re wasting my valuable time resources as well as the courts valuable time and resources

because they are never going to be able to prove their complaint is true. That’s the mind set as one approaches

these situations

the letter would go more like this:

-the claim itself should read: there is some man named bob who has filed a complaint that i

done wrong to the state of north Carolina; I don’t know who the state of north Carolina is; maybe bob can come to

court and explain more clearly to me but for me to make my special appearance I want to be compensated for my

lost time because this is a frivolous complaint that has no merit; and i require to be let alone.

Judge may ask you if you want to work in the best interest of the child or do some parenting

course or do some stupid thing or another(they are trying to contract with you)..just say “no thank you ! i a man

require immediate restoration of property”…

 -they will send back a letter telling “you” to appear in court. -letter two is a reply stating “ hold

on a minute see exhibit A, the previous communications i sent you; it clearly states that i am an “I” not a “you”. -

now take your claim to the clerk who has the original complaint and hand them your claim and for the court clerk

to file this in bob’s case as my response because I don’t know who bob or Canada are…

Paying you court fee..how would you like to apy the $80.. u can offer them if u cant afford the

lump sum $1 a day for the next 80 days and they will accept.. generally it’s the best you can do. Be honorable folk.

The right to self govern is a responsibility and judges want to see someone who is true and real.

313 | P a g e

On the record On the record only happens with the spoken word under oath or affirmation in an

open court…in viva voche Elvis Presley can’t make a record until he signs it Record means verbal In legalese

(administrative courts) they can take the written word as on the record but not a court of record moving under the

common law. The legal world can twist their words anytime they want because it’s their term of art.. they have the

right to do whatever they want to do with it. We don’t have a license to understand the words of their society.

We don’t understand their legalese as they don’t understand our common law gibberish. Hence

why the lowly clerks have no clue as they aren’t trained to…don’t get mad be understanding ur presenting what

looks like gibbersh with your common law

common law and common sense are sadly none too common...

Man doesn’t answer to legal gibberish. He only answers to another man, hence a claim better be

on the table or a signature on a order..

 On one’s day in court that’s when one presses the record.. The do it under affirmation not

oath..but u can do it on oath..my belief say affirmation is for me.. So you utter for the record (repeat your claim

word for word) and then you ask the other side to speak for the record and the other side can’t create it because it

doesn’t have a voice..

Who is this mystical magical ‘THEY’ u mean some man named bob in a black robe.. If he gives u

an order get it ion writing and sign it then send him a bill he is not your judge he is the cases judge?

Dismissed vs discharged

Dismissed is it can go away for a while but can come back; discharged means it’s gone forever.

We can’t sue anyone if it’s dismissed, because the case is still open, we still need to finish it. if it’s discharged, it’s

then a false charge, and we have cause.

- UCC in court No government created a baby. So they can’t say they have a vested interest. They

weren’t in bed with you… Trying to get you property (child) using ucc is strange because that is someone else’s

belief system. We didn’t create the ucc so use don’t know what it means.. we aren’t licensed to use their

language..ucc is intellectual property of someone else u have no permission.. in fact judges want you to use it

because they have a license to interpret for you….STAY CLEAR OF UCC!!

Just ask for your property!!!

 If an attorney say accordin to some code blah blah or statute you broke the code… So you ask

him are you going to take the stand and testify that that is exactly what it means? he’ll say “no” Reply” well then

that’s just your opinion then isn’t it?’” U: Did u write that code? Att; No

314 | P a g e

U:do you have the person who wrote the code here? Att: no U: because the code was written

from the public law do you have law before the court? Att: no its rolled up in sacramento somewhere u: no public

law where the code came from .. u don’t have the guy who wrote the code and u wont swear that this is exactly

what the code means… your simply giving me ur opinion of what he wrote…

- Finding the plaintiff If the state is coming after you for whatever.. send a letter to the plaintiff

asking if they are going to bring the state of texas to court so i can cross examine my accuser?” Simply ask the

court clerk “Do you have the plaintiffs address so i can properly sever them a proposal so i can settle the matter

before going into open court, because i don’t know who they are?“ You sent it to me and you sent this letter

obviously to them.. so what is the address or post office number i can send this to?” In Texas u would send a copy

to the govern and the secretary of state..not sure for Canada is the equivalent the premiere and the attorney

general?

The plaintiff must appear works whether you are the defendant or a man with all his rights..

Treat letter like google de gup.. u cant really make heads or tails of it except a date and an

address.. So u just want to inquire more details form the plaintiff..

- Court of original jurisdiction and the supreme court Supreme court decision always go back to

the court of original jurisdiction..and the original judge can ignore those rullings!! In administrative hearings a
judge can gtake 10 years if he likes to come up with a ruling and there is nothing u can do about that because u

bound yourself to his rules .. he may argue that he is taking his time because he doesn’t want to make a mistake

and take forever (you the man and person)

How to refer to the man in the black robe KL likes to look around like he is bored out of his mind..

because he has put his paper work in..he doesn’t want to have a convo with the judge.. if the judge ask you a

question reply with”u talking to me BOB” he will reply”u can call me judge” U reply “ i have only one judge and he

is God” “ur not my judge” “ur the case’s judge which you preside over, not over me” HE IS JUST A MAN LIKE US

NOT OUR JUDGE

- Judge vs civil administrative hearing officer Civil administrative hearing officers deal with

contract disputes between the state and the person holding the license/permit. This policy officer here says you

breached the contract broke the code #so and so, did you or did you not? Yes? Then you need to be penalized for

your breach. If you wanna keep operating under this piece of plastic you’re gonna pay the fine. But if you tell me

you’re a man going from point A to point B then I don’t have jurisdiction over you. But if you want to be a card-

holding member of our little society, you have to operate under our rules.

The whole gambit is to let the court know they have no jurisdiction over us.

315 | P a g e

Asking about jurisdiction, and when to speak in court How do you believe you have jurisdiction

over me? through a license? A permit? A franchise? How? how do you believe you have the right to bring me forth

before your tribunal? When did you believe you acquired that power/right/authority? Don’t open our mouth in
administrative court, everything in writing. Proves we’re competent. Never show any sign of

competency/understanding in their court. We’re idiots in their court. When we’re in our court, we are competent.

Rights are property, and when to speak in court

My rights are my property like my heartbeat my dreams my aspirations my goals they’re all part

of my property, a subset of my property, and governmenrts only exist to protect private property. when my rights

are trespassed upon I a man am harmed.

When we claim “property” we cover all things. Rights, children, land, name, time, animals etc.

Are you talking to me as a man? No? You’re talking to me as a public servant? I don’t require any

of your services at this time. Please let me alone. The law doesn’t say anything, the law reads, that little book you

have? You’re interpreting the law. You know you’re talking to a man, and I a man am telling you that your

interpretation of the code is trespassing on my property. Put that in front of a judge/jury in a common law court of

record, we’ll see how they believe what you interpret the code reads.

I want that person to come across the room and point to me and say that I did him wrong. I wish

to meet the plaintiff and settle it with the man. I want to compensate whomever it is that I’ve done wrong. Anyone

else I don’t want to hear it.

When the court is open it’s in session, anything filed is in closed court. Open court is open to the

public to witness. “out in the open”

 Take vs. present a notice Don’t ever say “take notice” in our docs, always say “I a man present

you this notice”

Understanding orders in court All orders come from the plaintiff/claimant/prosecutor or the

defendant/wrong-doer, not from the judge. Attorneys can only propose orders, he can’t place an order before the

court. I a man can place the order. When the judge/jury comes back, they’ll make a decision on whether to

recognize the order Cus the lawyer doesn’t want to have any liability, anyone who places the order is liable for

that order.

If we come in as the defendant, we must accept all orders of the court (orders proposed by

attorneys/lawyers then recognized by judge/jury). We cannot bill the order. If we come in as I the man, we can bill

the orders.

A minute order is when a new fact has come up and has just made us aware that we need to

amend our order.

316 | P a g e

There must be a real party of interest when we sue, no imaginary characters like

officer/captain/santaclaus. A judge is just a guy watching two guys do a pistol duel. He’s just there to referee/keep

the agreed-upon rules of the game.

We make a claim, they’ve been served (denied or ignored), there’s a controversy. We go to

court.
 - Competancy and habeus corpus I can’t enter into your court without competency to

understanding the charges. Everyone has the right to know what they’re being charged with.

Habeas corpus is suspended for Guantanamo bay because they’re charged under treason or

felony, which are not protected by habeas corpus.

An incompetent, or idiot bares no liability Incompetent simply means you don’t understand

exactly what is going on at this time nad that u don’t believe you’re going to be held liable or that one is bound by

the rules of court because you are not competent to provide a proper answer at this time. They can’t make

someone who is incompetent answer a question. Husband is the bondsman for the wife.. he holds all liability for

his wife and children Next friend is a status where u can help the incompetent and idiots.. Idiot cannot be

contracted with because its unethical… one cannot take advantage of or capitalize on someone less fortunate.

Show that you're making your best effort If you get a judgment that saying you are only able to

pay $30 dollar a month because of hard times…. Make sure you pay back with your best effort…pay $30.07 and the

following $30.13 and next one $30.05… this really shows you’re best effort…because the next mont you may only

be able to give $13.08 and an apology that you have historically tried to pay the best i could but this month i can’t

but i promise to keep trying my best to pay you back…. they will have to forgive you…
 Come in with the person (paper) and say do all you want with the person but you cannot do

anything to I the man. I will not put up my body to bond this defendant out of jail but what i will do is put up this

piece of paper. I will put up federal reserve notes or security instruments. This is a birth certificate is a security

instrument i hope u get what u need out of it. Is that going to be enough for the defendant to be released.

Latches as opposed to laches The statues of limitations lache you. Once you believe you’re

“latched” instead of lached which is fake, then you put yourself under their spell/jurisdiction.

317 | P a g e

Public law vs. code I didn’t write the code, did the judge write the code? State prosecutor? No? is

the person who wrote the code present today? Is the person who wrote the contract present today? If the

code/contract is in error who’s going to be held liable? How can I answer to a code that nobody here wrote? And

you guys are gonna just guess what that code means? No I need to know exactly what that means, who wrote this

thing? I require that you bring the law before the court, not the code.

Bill->votes by congress->signed into public law-> enrolled sitting in library of congress, 12345

pages long, and the code is a few sentences.

We don’t want the code, we want the actual public law. Insist on the law being read into court. I

wasn’t party to the law, did you sign it? Are we gonna have anyone come forward and swear to any of those

signatures on the law? Is anyone here a signatory on that law? I need to face them.

Restoration of property Point across the room and say “that man/woman touched my property,

see exhibit a,b,c,d, (4 kids)” don’t give them our kids’ names (names are things of value), just use photographs as

exhibits. Include in claim. “I want property returned now”

 What is the common belief of the people, if it’s in our favour, then trial by jury; sometimes we

want just the judge to carry the letter of the law in our court. Don’t bring in a jury if you have to educate them in

open court.

The courthouse belongs to us Building manager of the court house is the chief judge, steward of

the public court. He’s keeping the court for the people, waiting on the people, preserving the court in a manner

that will function efficiently for when the people/king/queen/crown/sovereign appears and needs to hold court.

He’s there in service of the court, he’s not the court. If they try to point out that it’s public policy of the building

that we can’t do that, but do you realize that the king has arrived in court? Are you trying to tell the king what he

can or cannot do in his realm? In his kingdom? In his castle? The judge is just the building manager, who do you

think he’s managing the building for? I have now arrived. Just ask the manager“do you say I do wrong?” because

wrong is the worst word you can say to a man. Doing wrong is admitting that you know better but still doing it

wrong, with deliberate intent. Hold steadfast, yes or no did I do wrong? If he says I do wrong, then where’s the

damage who’s been harmed, not speculation/conjecture, show me where the actual damages the present

damages which is by me doing what I did. Don’t tell me it could go wrong, not conjecture/speculation, can’t accuse

me of wrong due to a speculation/conjecture, it must be an actual event that has occurred/is accuring. Don’t tell

me in speculation that it MIGHT occur. This is MY court, this is the PEOPLE’S building. If the queen can hold court

3am in the morning, so can we, we are equals before god. Our court will run a full year of 365 term, it can be

convened at anytime during that year day or night. Ask judge “is the term of my court one year? Starting when?”

Holding court is future tense. Always holding court is lining up all the ducks in a row, holding

court is imagining explaining this in future in open court.

 How to move your case through court Give proper notice to the other side Give fair warning if

they didn’t heed our notice that they’re gonna be sued and that I’m going to move a claim and I’m going to do it by

trial by jury, and that I’m gonna occupy a public courthouse, and I’m gonna require the

318 | P a g e

magistrate and the public building manager (chief judge) to inform the staff at the courthouse

that I’m coming in. and I’m going to present my case in open forum in an open court before trial by jury. Tell the

building manager that I need to use the room and that they have rooms available any time of the day cus I know

the court’s open 24/7 365, make him fully aware that he knows that I know the court’s open 24/7, not 9-5. I know

in 21 days there should be a room available, if not I’m gonna hold it in the hallway.

Obviously the defendant’s gonna be summoned to appear, and they’re not gonna appear. If the

defendant doesn’t show up, and we get a default judgement, they have the right to contest the judgement. That’s

ok, our case is tight. Sheriffs are used to carry out levies.

- Do you believe I do wrong? someone tries to hand you a citation u say i only answer to

claims..citation is not a claim. I thought i was here because someone says i do wrong? Is anybody here say i do or

did wrong? Where does it say in your codes or statues that i did wrong? Wrong is a common law term. The state

cant say u do wrong because we are it’s creators. U cant turn to god and tell him he is wrong because he will just

laugh at you..

- Come in with the person (paper birthcertificate) and say do all you want with the person but

you cannot do anything to I the man. I will not put up my body to bond this defendant out of jail but what i will do

is put up this piece of paper. I will put up federal reserve notes or security instruments. This is a birth certificate is a

security instrument i hope u get what u need out of it. Is that going to be enough for the defendant to be released?
 How to reclaim your status as a man File our notice of error: We made a mistake of answering as

a defendant before, because we do not have the capacity. We were just made aware that we’re not the defendant.

I’m sorry I wasted the court’s time and energy. At once time I thought it was a great benefit to be a defendant, at

present I maintain that I hold constructive possession of said article, constructive possession (one time I believed it

was in my best interest to possess this thing), now it’s become constructive trespass ( I wish it to be gone but it

won’t leave). I on this date believe I’ve erred back on (date). For I believe I was in a state of disequilibrium and

incapacitation to have made such a wish, for the go between is to bind my person with said article, so today

august.19th I wish for the immediate removal of said article from property and I.From this date after whomever he

or she sayeth said article is to remain about thy person will be the causal agent of trespass to property and will be

held liable for monetary compensation for damages. From day forth (date) whomever comes and says that that

article is to remain on my person on my property will be the cause of trespass on me and my property and will be

held liable for compensation.

- Public law vs. code I didn’t write the code, did the judge write the code? State prosecutor? No?

is the person who wrote the code present today? Is the person who wrote the contract present today? If the

code/contract is in error who’s going to be held liable? How can I answer to a code that nobody here wrote? And

you guys are gonna just guess what that code means? No I need to know exactly what that means, who wrote this

thing? I require that you bring the law before the court, not the code.

Bill->votes by congress->signed into public law-> enrolled sitting in library of congress, 12345

pages long, and the code is a few sentences.

 We don’t want the code, we want the actual public law. Insist on the law being read into court. I

wasn’t party to the law, did you sign it? Are we gonna have anyone come forward and swear to any of those

signatures on the law? Is anyone here a signatory on that law? I need to face them.

319 | P a g e

Latches as opposed to laches The statues of limitations lache you. Once you believe you’re

“latched” instead of lached which is fake, then you put yourself under their spell/jurisdiction.

The courthouse belongs to us Building manager of the court house is the chief judge, steward of

the public court. He’s keeping the court for the people, waiting on the people, preserving the court in a manner

that will function efficiently for when the people/king/queen/crown/sovereign appears and needs to hold court.

He’s there in service of the court, he’s not the court. If they try to point out that it’s public policy of the building

that we can’t do that, but do you realize that the king has arrived in court? Are you trying to tell the king what he

can or cannot do in his realm? In his kingdom? In his castle? The judge is just the building manager, who do you

think he’s managing the building for? I have now arrived. Just ask the manager“do you say I do wrong?” because

wrong is the worst word you can say to a man. Doing wrong is admitting that you know better but still doing it

wrong, with deliberate intent. Hold steadfast, yes or no did I do wrong? If he says I do wrong, then where’s the

damage who’s been harmed, not speculation/conjecture, show me where the actual damages the present

damages which is by me doing what I did. Don’t tell me it could go wrong, not conjecture/speculation, can’t accuse

me of wrong due to a speculation/conjecture, it must be an actual event that has occurred/is accuring. Don’t tell

me in speculation that it MIGHT occur. This is MY court, this is the PEOPLE’S building. If the queen can hold court

3am in the morning, so can we, we are equals before god. Our court will run a full year of 365 term, it can be

convened at anytime during that year day or night. Ask judge “is the term of my court one year? Starting when?”
 Holding court is future tense. Always holding court is lining up all the ducks in a row, holding

court is imagining explaining this in future in open court.

What is the common belief of the people, if it’s in our favour, then trial by jury; sometimes we

want just the judge to carry the letter of the law in our court. Don’t bring in a jury if you have to educate them in

open court.

Restoration of property Point across the room and say “that man/woman touched my property,

see exhibit a,b,c,d, (4 kids)” don’t give them our kids’ names (names are things of value), just use photographs as

exhibits. Include in claim. “I want property returned now”

When they tried to sue the WWF, they changed the name to WWE. The judgement could not be

collected. That’s why a judgement without the ability to collect means nothing.

How to move your case through court Give proper notice to the other side Give fair warning if

they didn’t heed our notice that they’re gonna be sued and that I’m going to move a claim and I’m going to do it by

trial by jury, and that I’m gonna occupy a public courthouse, and I’m gonna require the magistrate and the public

building manager (chief judge) to inform the staff at the courthouse that I’m coming in. and I’m going to present

my case in open forum in an open court before trial by jury.

320 | P a g e
 Tell the building manager that I need to use the room and that they have rooms available any

time of the day cus I know the court’s open 24/7 365, make him fully aware that he knows that I know the court’s

open 24/7, not 9-5. I know in 21 days there should be a room available, if not I’m gonna hold it in the hallway.

Obviously the defendant’s gonna be summoned to appear, and they’re not gonna appear. If the

defendant doesn’t show up, and we get a default judgement, they have the right to contest the judgement. That’s

ok, our case is tight. Sheriffs are used to carry out levies.

Don’t run into court with a claim, do the proper paperwork and file. Until we’ve given them

notice that they’ve done us wrong, and that they still continue doing us wrong after the notice. For instance,

ignoring the notices that we’ve just sent them, so we make a claim that hey if you don’t back off you’ll be harming

me. Explain our claim in the administrative process before you file it at a court, we order them to stop because

they’re trespassing. If they don’t stop causing us harm we’ll be requiring compensation.

Prosecuting the prosecutor If someone brings a false accusation upon us, we can bring a suit to

them for making a false claim against us. The state is a fiction, so it’s only the prosecutor, BOB the man who is

harming us, full liability. Where do you get the right to bring this false claim against I the man?

When facing off with a state council, they will have an edge over us, it’s their word over ours. If

we’re in administrative court, preponderance of evidence goes to the state in administrative hearing. Issues of

preexisting contracts do not need to be evidenciated. To make it 50/50, and to require state to provide evidence

(contract etc) we must evoke the common law by filing our claim against the prosecutor and serving them.

Creating your casefile number, they can’t create it until we’ve gone through the proper notifications. We may need

leave of court of minimum 30 days to properly file the claim. Anyone who enters a plea on my behalf bears full

liability for the plea.

 Don’t speak legalese. In court it’s 3 seconds for anyone to answer a question. The jury is to take

the 3 second silence as an answer.

- Jury of your peers in common law Kalr first saw jury written down on the manga carta. It just a

right to be judge by your fellow knights as a king may not know the custom of your area… so he ask the

surrouinding neighbourghhood of people and ask them if this is how they roll out here..if the defendant or man

has always acted. The jury can set a king straight in court of the custom and practices of the local people. So if law

conflict the jury over rules it… A man wants to strive to put like minded people on his jury so they rule in his

favour . that a intregral part of common law. custom even trump common law as what is common law might not

be stand up to the great customs of your people… ie. one goes into a strange land and one offend’s them with your

custom.. and they take u to court you have a right to fill that jury with your peers so as to show u ment no harm

just practicing your custom. And that u did no wrong… remember wrong is when you know better and still do keep

chanting i did no wrong judge says guilty not guilty you just repeat i did no wrong… any man claim here i did

wrong? judge repeatsguilty not guilty again i repeat did i do wrong is there anybody claiming here i do wrong and

that i have not compensated them come forward or forever hold your peace? obviously write this down don’t say

outloud!!!

321 | P a g e

Knowing who you are in court

Civil servants believe they have the power…when the truth is the people have the power…the

legal society knows it cannot notice the court or testify in court under oath and affirmation or provide evidence

and fact before the court of a common law court… They get you by bringing in “you “ bob and the legal fiction
 Play stupid… does that code say i did some man harm.. well then i don’t know about know

code..i apologize if i hurt your code if you bring him here i will apologize to them..

Realize the judge is not going after you it the prosecutor you have to take issue with as he is

bringing his case The judge is simply the ref… Set judges straight in writing” where do you believe you get the

authority over i the man?” the judge will quickly reveal to you that he has no authority over you as a man… so

where does the prosecutor derives his authority over i the man? And the prosecutor should say “i have no

authority over you a man either” Then close by saying “then is there anything else i can help you with today

because i stand here as a man before i go home?”

“do you believe i a man has to get a license to move from point a to point b?”

do this all in writing!!! Work out everything in the pretrial so that by the time you get to trial u

have one question…where did you get the authority?

*Beg for forgiveness if you do some one wrong in court…it’s how you can get off

Watch out for the “YOU” if you go along with you then the judge has jurisdiction over you…(the

man and the defendant)

if you tell a judge he is doing wrong…that’s like saying they knew better and still did it. There is

no excuse for doing something wrong…

 ‘I am man claim wish or require….” Now maybe your claim has validity maybe some one come

forward with a higher claim and then maybe you both can share or not..but a man claims.

If a judge ask “is this you bob?” and bob says yes well then the judge has joinder. Because on his

sheet it has joe listed as the defendant… It’s a word game. You is plural…one must respond “i am a man not a you”

Pleas and confessions

If someone is offering u a plea deal it is because u already confessed some where down the

line…u might now remember but u did…what u did or di d not sya may have led to your confession…

322 | P a g e

They may ask immediately the person for a plea deal not the man.. they can enter a plea on

behave of the defendant but not the man…. People can enter a plea on your behalf but that makes them liable

Because you are a man. in there case you are the defendant..who cares whats in their case..it’s what’s in your case

So what u say is if you don’t stop with their case I am going to file my own claim against them!

Habeus corpus - simply means bring the body - I would like to know why I am in here Basically

who said I did wrong..i want to face my accuser by right and authority… no accuser no testification no case.. hence

why they are waiting for you to testify against myself.. they can’t compel you to turn states witness on yourself.

Although that is all the irs is asking of you..to voluntarily confess…

Evoking the common law U don’t claim the common law u evoke it..”I claim…….” Automatically

evokes the common law Filing a complaint is legalese

 Making a claim is common law!! now if someones comes in a makes a counter claim then you

will bring one piece of proof The he will bring one piece of proof then I will bring another piece and son on and so

forth Until one of the two wins

- Putting the prosecutor on the stand - so u want to put the prosecutor on the stand after you

have claimed your court. Careful … a man want for nothing u require them to place the prosecutor on the stand -

then ask them “do I owe you anything?” The prosecutor will say “no” Respond with “Who told you to come in here

and take my money? where is he I want to cross examine them? Who is that guy? The prosecutor “I work for the

state” ask back” where is that state? Don’t I have the right to cross examine that state? this should make the judge

laugh.. because this is the trick revealed like a boss

remember u can’t accomplish this unless you make a claim so you can prosecute the prosecutor..

or else u will be in contempt of (their) court..!!! the prosecutor is the agent for the principal “the state” what you

require is to see the principal…guess what I don’t think the state is going to show up… will they be wearing pants

or skirts? What’s does the principal “the state” claim I owe? What are the damages? What’s do they claim I did?

What loss have they incurred?

benefit of dismissal is to keep one self-honorable..what one is saying is that if really did

something wrong It gives them some time to make a counter claim.

It goes something like this” I wish to have this case dismissed without prejiduce so that any man

wants to come forward at anytime in the future for the next 10 ,000 years and move a claim against me doing

wrong, I would be more than glad to justifiably compensate that man for anything I have ever done wrong to him

as I am here to

323 | P a g e
 compensate all but if any man makes a false claim I want to seek compensation from him for me

making me waste my time answering a false claim….

If they make claims of harm ie my eyes are itchy and my nose is running because of those

chickens.. then tell them to hand u a bill… show me a doctor bill of your damages… I am sure you’re not just

making a false claim now!!!??i’m sure u have proof u can back up… basically where the harm? where is the loss?

where is the damages?

- Dealing with the second dimension in court - if someone has got you contractually pinned down

and there is no way out…u have a warrant in debt and they are threating to garnish your salary just simply notice

that says I can only pay __( insert what you can truly afford) per month or year because anything more would harm

you the man at this time and if I run into more money I will pay this debt off as fast as I can… Because none can

verify the bill you are answering to the bill not the man… hint hint

Never say no in court..if anything do a conditional acceptance like Gordon hall

If a Judge asks one “if the prosecutor would like to proceed?” respond with “ i would like to

proceed right to dismissal and if you don’t want to dismiss it with prejudice if not I would like to get some sort of of

scheduling fee for me reappearing here and have to come here and take time off work and reappear ..so again I

would like to proceed to a dismissal with prejudice because I will come back here if they have a bonafide case

against me but if you don’t , I am going to require a scheduling fee, because every one else in the room is getting

paid to be here except me and this should be all fair and just as we should all be getting a little something for being

here.

Talk to judges on a first name bases.

 I don’t care what it says in the 2D fictional world, I’m holding the car in the 3D real physical

world. Someone has to come in and claim that what I’m physically in possession of, they should lawfully be in

possession, not me. Until then they have no case.

The plaintiff must appear in court, so if the state is the plaintiff, mr/mrs state must still physically

appear, not just by council.

If the plaintiff accuses us of something, even if we’re already a defendant we have the right to

face our accuser and cross-examine the plaintiff. Require leave of court and put it in writing. Calm and collected,

writing this way we gonna look scaarryyyy.

Understanding judgements When our claim is before the court, require the judge to make the

other side answer this claim. Because now the claim is in open court, they have one more chance to argue or

contest or deny this claim or forever hold their peace. If not, I demand and require this court to recognize that my

claim is a true claim. Once the court recognizes the claim as true, we get our judgement, and we can sell it to a

company that buys judgements.

If a prosecutor got a judgement, he has to find a way to execute it, the judge doesn’t execute

judgements. The same applies for us, we have to get our judgement and then collect on our own.

A judge is there as witness that our case has merit. And that judgement is for the claimant. The

judge has no authority to execute his own judgements.

324 | P a g e
 ***Karl presumes something is afoul when he hears judges executing their own judgements by

telling the guards to take someone into custody for judgements the state wins. The states should be executing

their own judgements, this puts the judge on the side of the state. (conflict of interest)***

If this should happen, ask the judge : you took the proposed order, you converted it INTO an

order, and then you rendered judgement, and now you’re the one who’s gonna execute the judgement? Because if

I got a judgement of $1Mill against the state of Alabama you would tell me to go collect the judgement on my

own.”

All the judge is supposed to say is the judgement for the prosecution, next case.

Legal vs Lawful. Legal is code, Lawful is “harm no man”

Never let anyone call u a petitioner… calling u that is them claim godly authority over you.

Petition is to pray to a deity.. Petition -don’t be like marc stevens who files complaints!! You want to file claims and

be a man!!!

-don’t make proposal like lawyers.. order, require and wishes because it’s your court and you’re a

man

Thumb print vs. seal - the lentz court requires the magistrate; it come to the attention of said

court that the services of _______(insert name)magistrate are available to serve their court; if _____(name)

believes he is qualified to administer the affairs of a court of record; his honorable service will please said court..”
signed dated and thumb printed. Done - ignore gold seals.. just use thumb prints… gold seals have finger prints of

it. Man trumps seal… Man trumps person because he created them.. so man turmps seals for the same reason..

Federal rule 26B-to move your party’s claim that the defense is that get to know any description

and nature of any condition or location of any document or anything they can touch or tangible and the location of

any person who has knowledge of the wrong… you only compare this rules because its their rules and decision..

you don’t want to use their paperwork.. [cf. Federal rule 26B]

How to write to a judge-

The letter should go like this-

Bob, Greetings,

I hear your going to be the civil hearing officer presiding over this matter that’s going to come

before you on ______(insert date here ), you go on to explain the rules of your court,

325 | P a g e

-watch out for “AT” the queen bench in your writings and filings NOT “IN” …as you are in your

court at their building.

 Don’t use their paperwork for filings as it gives them jurisdiction..you lost control of any aspect of

you.. -you’re applying which means your begging..dont!! write your own forms and letters uniquely..so as not to

lose status..

- you basically are saying your understand and consent to everything in their world by using their

paperwork. DON’T!

-don’t be like marc stevens who files complaints!! You want to file claims and be a man!!!

-don’t make proposal like lawyers.. order, require and wishes because it’s your court and you’re a

man

- Using "shall" to beat tickets Breaking code = breach of contract. Policy-man enforces policy.

They’re presuming that you are under that code, and they’re trying to contract with you (ticket). Gov can’t order a

man to do anything …..without just compensation because they cannot compel a man to do anything; they can

only propose, and “shall” is a proposition. Until we are under Napoleonic code, then we screwed.

Shall: Shall and will are two of the English modal verbs. They have various uses, including the

expression of propositions about the future, in what is usually referred to as the future tense of English. The

traditional prescriptive grammar rule stated that, when expressing pure futurity (without any additional meaning

such as desire or command), shall was to be used when the subject was in the first person (I or we), and will in

other cases. In practice this rule is commonly not adhered to by any group of English speakers, and many speakers

do not differentiate between will and shall when expressing futurity, with the use of will being much more

common and less formal than shall. In many specific contexts, however, a distinction still continues.

We cannot break a code that uses the word “shall”. Require officer to read code in open court.

“Ok I shall”
 Attorneys and the supreme court Attorney’s don’t have belief system they use precedent and

case law.. They say things like “ i don’t believe this but the Robert’s court of 2006 judge Scolia ruled in blah blah

blha…!!” they have to go to someone above them who has established the position of the supreme court

But when as a man establish our position before court we are representative of god.

Attorney’s establish position man has beliefs in court..

To govern is to maintain a positon. As a govern on a boat it maintains the position so you don’t

have to steer…

The supreme court makes a decision between the president and the congress. The supreme

court is not supposed to make ruling between me and bob. Because that’s not within their jurisdiction..

I a man is not under the rule of the supreme court..

It could take u a good 12 years to get a ruling in the supreme court but it always go back to be

tried at a court of original jurisdiction…and the judge of that case could say that is a lovely ruling you have there

from the supreme

326 | P a g e

court of Alabama but you know what i am going to disregard it because ur in my case ur in my

court house my jurisdiction my realm and i am telling u…it means nothing.. the judge is witness an asshole in front

of him he won care about how good his supreme court paperwork is he will judge against him…supreme court

decision are a waste of time

 The constitution and the courts A man doesn’t have to stand up to anybody or anything, a man

just makes his claim and somebody has to counter his claim. We didn’t write the constitution/bill of rights/ charter

etc. we weren’t there. so don’t cite the constitution. Since we can’t bring in anyone who signed the constitution

etc. to verify testify under oath, to what that document means. To cite that doc we’re not a party to is insane.

Imagine your kid coming up to you saying “the constitution says I can stay up past 9pm” you’ll laugh at him. He’s

under your domestic jurisdiction, in your house. Not the constitution.

Lawyers are allowed to use the constitution because they cannot voice their opinion, they can

only uphold a position from a higher entity than themselves.

A man can be a judge, but a judge can’t be a man.

Just file your paperwork and let that speak for itself.

Understanding federal courts Federal means: to pledge. A contract, an agreement. I pledge that

I’ll show up at the pledged place to meet this man over this matter. I pledge to meet you at this court in a civil

matter.

Smith court meet AT queen’s bench. They’ll modify it to “FAMILY court meet IN queen’s bench”.

This will screw us over.

We must be very aware of our paper work and if they’re being changed.

Authenticated certified complete copy of a case file to date. If it’s stylized as an administrative

court file (federal/district/family court) then we write back “I’m not addressing this court I did not move my claim

in this court why is this court trespassing in my court?” how do you believe that the US district court has any right

to be in the district court? If you have a claim against me get your own case file. Is this not a public court house?
Where two people from different states can meet? So is there a reason you won’t allow me to see the jury and let

the jury hear my claim? Is there a reason why you deny me access to this public building?

Call the judge by his first name. he’s not my judge, he’s not my magistrate/honour, he was

assigned as magistrate by the US district court, I didn’t assign him. I asked him if he would like to be the magistrate

of the lentz court, so I have to presume he does not want to. So he has nothing to do with the lentz court and the

lentz court has nothing to do with the US district court. (no affiliation)

Payment options for filing a claim

Your claim is private between you and whomever while you’re doing your administrative process

and settle the matter.. But once you file your claim with the clerk and she gives u a case number, it’s public. Say to

the court clerk “i require to file a case in the public court house” and show that the other side has been served.

clerk says “civil or criminal” Reply” i don’t know about civil or criminal i just know this man done me wrong and

under the common law i have the right to use this court house to have this matter heard and tried before the

jury ”

327 | P a g e

“They respondent has 21 days to respond so anytime shortly after that i require a jury to be

seated and would appreciate it greatly if you could get me an empty room for the trial .” She say it cost $80 You

can work out a payment plan or You can use “the courts are free to the King and his subjects” KL says but i would

rather pay that have anybody says they did anything for free for me as there is always something attached to it..

How to avoid a trial by ambush

 Summons should have the entire case (which there should be a complaint or claim) attached to

it… this is a common tactics of the clerks they will keep this info from a defendant.. press the issue and get them

on the record saying there is no more paperwork showing up at the trial.. they will throw u under the bus.. they

will magically give u the rest or be held liable.. because u have them on the record and there better not be

anything new on the day we show up to court.. u have to remember that evil walk around us!!! Thye need to give u

a case with a suit inside of it.. If it went to court and they showed up wth that paperwork you would tell the judge

that it was inadmissible as u were not given any of the documents when i asked the clerk. As a judge he should

know that any time you summons someone to court they must be given full disclosure!! Just tell them u got it on

tape that the clerk say there is nothing more in the file..

Now if the prosecutors doesn’t show up? There will be a order placed for an arrest warrant for

them to show and will be dragged in before this court to answer to it..

If we accept the fines and swear to pay a dollar a month till infinity.. cant they come after all that

i have in terms of inheretence for my kids if i die because i still owe them? Do we place a lien to protect our selves

next or a trust? I don’t want ot take that debt into the next life..i prefer to move for a discharge…what do you think

karl?

If you went to uses Hale V. Hinckle ..just ask are u hale or hinckle..well that is a different case and

different circumstance that they may be kinf of similar but they are different..so lets focus on this case and its

particulars…this court is not interested in what people said in 1902..at that trial one of the contestants may have

stuck his tounge out at the judge and that’s is what did it..we don’t know? so lets not use it!!
 If a judge at the beging call him by his name ..man to man conversation with him.. “to be clear as

a man to man conversation you want to be called your honr or judge” but now that i am calling you your homnr

but know that i am only talking to you as a man” so when i say ‘your honor’ you know i am only talking to you as a

man”

Section 8-Judgements—Trust, mortgage, border crossing, liens, bonds, warrants in deb,

judgement collection and odds and ends & WEED.

The below is what your government agency will claim..

328 | P a g e

hey greg,

man responsible for god's law cause no harm, injury, loss or breach of contract...

person are responsible for that aswell as every code and statute on the book

a person is a title that places man into their codes and statutes...( without a name they can

proceed)

but if i murder somone all i need is a witness to point out he did it..

but in codes and statutes a witness is not enough...a cop could witness me speed but that is not

key...they need something else to get it to stick...

the name (title) is what gives speeding any jurisdiction..

-----------------------

i think alot of kl method shows way too much understanding of their world...ie. showing up to a

summons?? insanity to me...its like losing to win....i say this because you have to go into their court and remove

the presumption your appearance created......even if a warrant goes out its not for me....its for the all caps...and if

some officers confuses the two then he is personlly liable..not the judge who is well within his right to issue what

ever order and judgments he wishes in his pretend world of actors in what ever play they are in....
 i just remind them when their play interferes with my reality and how can they proceed? they

can't..

[1:00:57 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Yes but I won't go COR because of an order in their

court...I move my court the moment anyone tries to convert me to the all caps name...why wait for an order for

the all cap name in their court...I won't let a admin case proceed to the point where I void an order...I am stopping

any proceeding from moving forward...a void order in essence is trying to get u back to the beginning....the name

IS the beginning....

329 | P a g e

Me thinks this is a Stop the name game...not a Stop the order game..

[1:13:36 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: if i found myself still being rail roaded and they keep

proceeding and even make a warrant for the arrest of the all cap name while i am in court... i would write a notice

stating BOB JOHNSON [ the man who acts like a judge at times] has made an order for the all caps name in the

presence of i a man and also is a witness that i am not that person.... now let them try an drag me before this court

again with BOB as my witness now :)

lol i am a dude....but that aside...

so u are basically agreeing that you're the all cap name and your defence is that there is no

accuser...thats will get u victory but, you're the all cap name...

i am attacking that very presumption....not waiting until they believe that i am the all cap name

and then make an order to pay... i ask who thinks i am the all cap name? then if u cant attach me to the name, how

can u attach me to any order?...

who knows whether i will be honorale and pay..heck maybe i wont be...
 but we wont figure that out unless they can answer who thinks i am the all cap name....

i believe we are waiting to late with a void order...

why are we letting them get us to that position...i say 'no way go back to the begining'....

[1:48:18 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: but the question order is something like this:

who?

what debt?

whose the accuser?

what are the facts?

330 | P a g e

i stop at ... who? u move past who to what debt? is all i am saying

[1:49:16 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: its like if i void the top order any orders attached to it

are also void...but if i kill the name game they cant attach anything else too it..

[1:51:11 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: look tom dickens owes a debt.... the debt might be

real... i am saying i am not tom dickens...... i am robin mitchell...

[8:15:23 AM | Edited 8:16:36 AM] Julz: dude you really should learn to fight your own battles,

better yet don't fight at all, be happy with whatever you believe, whatever will be will be the future's not ours to

see and when destiny says it's time for you to change your perception of reality once again go with the natural

flow and keep it on the low, force yourself upon no one unlike me... lol and be happy with what you believe if
that's what makes you happy, you define the law, you define what you are and what you are not etc. etc. much like

Karl did when he was helping Bali in court and at one point had to intervene and tell the magistrate:

[8:15:59 AM | Edited 8:17:09 AM] Julz: Karl Lentz: “Well i’m kind of looking at a law dictionary

here and i think i could be very assistant because i don’t think you understand he’s making a claim that he’s a man

and that he’s not appearing in person and England is a common law land, so he’s making a claim that he’s a man

under the common law and that he’s not acting as a person within your society, so i’ll make this real simple for

you; he is a person, a man is a person, but he’s not a person within your society, within your culture, he is a person

within his society, in which society he has a duty imposed upon him therefore not failing to live up as a person

within his society, so it’s very simple; a person is a man, he’s not saying he’s not a person, and he’s not saying he’s

not a man, and you can’t make him accept the title of person within your legal society, you’ve got your own legal

society that’s making a claim against him, and that’s the crown, it’s a legal society, it’s not his society, so you’re

coming after a person you have no jurisdiction or control over because he’s not part of your boy-scout society, he

will not understand the rules of your society and therefore you can’t impose upon him“

[8:18:54 AM | Edited 8:18:36 AM] Julz: • i, [a] man’s “person” [in other words place and role] in

relation to Your [‘LEGAL SOCIETY’] is that of: ––(a ) [a] man who either has the right to be recognised as [a]

member of Your ['LEGAL SOCIETY'], or accept [the] title of person within Your ['LEGAL SOCIETY'], though i, [a]

man, know of no law that can turn [a] right into [an] obligation, or ––(b ) [a] man who shall have the right to be

recognised as [a] member of Your ['LEGAL SOCIETY'], or accept [the] title of person within Your ['LEGAL SOCIETY'],

yet i, [a] man, know of no law that can obligate i, [a] man, to claim that right [Cf. "Everyone shall have the right to

recognition everywhere as a person before the law." International Covenant on Civil and Political Rgihts 177

(1948) Article 16; "Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law." Universal

Declaration of Human Rights 2 (1

[6:51:20 PM | Edited 6:52:16 PM] Julz: a person is a man who has a place & role among others

which entitles him to certain benefits & obligations, i can't see dead people being able to do that

[6:52:35 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: but if they have a will?

[6:52:55 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: or a trust is at play..?

[6:52:57 PM | Edited 6:53:21 PM] Julz: will's are legal

 [6:53:07 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: indenture

331 | P a g e

[6:53:10 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: ?

[6:56:11 PM] Julz: We have seen that before the establishment of the civil estate, property was

inseparable from possession; that, in fact, it was only the right to enjoy it, while it was possessed, and that as soon

as the party ceased to possess, the thing became subject to the use of the first occupant.

[6:56:53 PM] Julz: It could be transferred only by delivery or putting the party in possession.

There could then exist no other testaments than those of a gift causa mortis, accompanied by delivery, resolvable

by the recovery of the donor.

[6:57:06 PM] Julz: It seems like a contradiction that a man should, by preserving all his rights

while he is living, still transfer them for a time when he shall no longer exist ; that he may transfer a right, not at

the present time, but for a time when such a right shall have been lost to him forever.

[6:58:15 PM] Julz: Via common law goggles it is difficult to conceive that the mere will of a man

should create a right in favour of one who knows nothing about the matter, nor concurred, in the lifetime of the

testator, by accepting the gift; nor that the devisee or legatee should acquire a right by accepting, after his death,

the offers of a man who no longer exists, and whom death has stripped of all his rights.

[6:59:31 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: so then a dead mans trust to his benficiaries has no

weight and can be opened by any judge since he has no rights there are no interfereence of his rights as he is

deceased?

[7:00:19 PM] Julz: there was a time when the municipal law had not made any provision for the

transmission of the property of the deceased, and, in this case, the rights to it are acquired to the first occupant by

the right of occupancy, immediately after his death.

[7:00:43 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: so his trustee becomes the occupant?

[7:00:57 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: carrying the torch sort to speak?

[7:01:06 PM] Julz: god did not intend for the dead to affect the living
 [7:01:33 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: so how do we protect our trust for our childrens

future benfit

[7:01:40 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: ?

[7:01:46 PM] Julz: give what you must give of the earth whilst you are a part of it coz after that

you have no right to it that was the way of common law

[7:02:05 PM] Julz: so how do we protect our trust for our childrens future benfitthrough legalities

[7:02:28 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: thx u

What is ARMS?

332 | P a g e

Anything that a man wears for his defense, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at or

strike at another.

Co. Litt. 1616, 162a; State v. Buzzard, 4 Ark. 18. This term, as it Is used in theconstitution, relative

to the right of

citizens to bear arms, refers to the arms of a militiaman or soldier, and the word is used in its

military sense. The

arms of the infantry soldier are the musket and bayonet; of cavalry and dragoons, the sabre,

holster pistols, and

carbine; of the artillery, the field-piece, siegegun, and mortar, with side arms. The term, in this

connection, cannot

be made to cover such weapons as dirks, daggers, slung-shots, sword- canes, brass knuckles, and

bowieknives.

These are not military arms. English v. State, 35 Tex. 476, 14 Am. Rep. 374; Hill v. State, 53 Ga.

472; Fife v. State, 31

Ark. 455, 25 Am. Rep. 556; Andrews v. State, 3 Heisk. (Tenn.) 170, 8 Am. Rep. 8; Aymette v. State,

2 Humph.
 (Tenn.) 154. Arms, or coat of arms, signifies insignia, i. e., ensigns of honor, such as were formerly

assumed by

soldiers of fortune, and painted on their shields todistinguish them; or nearly the same as

armorial bearings, (q. v.)

Your signature didn’t create the money..your signature and their signature and the terms and

condition created the wealth.. say the mortgage is $1,000,000 lets replace that creation or contract for a $1 million

and convert it into a diamond ring i gave the bank( the $1 mill mortgage contract they hold) so i pay them monthly

for that diamond.. i excpect at the end of the terms that i will get my diamond back so it can stop being used

aganst me… but what the banks are doing is from almost day one under their power of attourney term in the

contract have gone and sold your mortgage without u knowing it… well then why are u paying the bank? Should n’t

u be paying the holder in due course, which is the person holding your diamond? That’s the trick u want to pay the

holder in due course because when ur done u want your diamond back and the bank will not be able to produce

it..so u will be able to stop paying the bank…but i am sure the holder in due course does still have a beef!!! Not

sure what to do with that

look into master status on license...

Remind boarderguards that ur are moving at ur leisure and not in a commercial capacity because

it please me to do so… i don’t need paper work or licenses to move.. Universal Declaration of Human Rights - the

United Nations 1948 ….Article 13. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the

borders of each state. (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his

country.

State: an organized political community living under a single system of government

 Don’t forget about being a valuable member of society….because they will be the people you will

call upon as character witness!!

Make sure when u get them to RELINQUISH a bond for the amount you say is fair and you have

had the bond verified and at another location or in escrow and then and only then can they come in …

they could come in with the bond and potentially leave with that bond saying “you wanted a

bond but you didn’t say for how long?” and they could strong arm you and leave with it!! holding that is key and

the only control you have!!

333 | P a g e

If u should find urself stuck at the parole level you need to go back to the inciting moment of the

incident and make you claim that they never had jurisdiction… no way around this fact!! Go to the beginning!!!

Be careful what you wish for, what is the timeframe for lawful action against a wrong,

understanding contract law, and making it clear that it's your medicine and not marijuana Karl Lentz explains to

Mark the dangers of rescinding a contract made with the court in regards to his probation. Doing so could result in

him going straight back to jail. Karl says that he's got to go further back to challenge the fact that they never had

jurisdiction over the man because no man is going to come forward and say i did anything wrong in the first place.

He reminds him of Greg who was stubborn and sent a fourth notice in after working with Karl to have his ankle

bracelet taken off immediately, even though Karl warned him against taking such actions, and he wound up

straight back in jail. Public servants are there to carry out man's wishes so be careful what you wish for. Karl refers

Mark back to the earlier part in his talkshoe where he speaks about the CROWN taking you into a CROWN court

with CROWN lawyers and a CROWN judge and how he could have used what he said there as his defence. He goes
on to explain that if it was him in Mark's situation and the CROWN wanted to charge him with something he would

say that he wants it dealt with immediately. If a wrong has been committed it must be taken care of right away,

and if he needs to compensate someone he did a wrong to he'll do it now. Not in six months or a year like in

statutory court, but now. If they say that's not how we do things around here, then you move your claim against

them right away. Like a man in Canada did. He was charged and arrested on saturday and came in on monday with

the bill for following all of the officer's orders and they dropped all the charges. Mark says that he may have made

an agreement with the court to do urine tests and all that, but no longer wishes to do that. Karl recommends that

he ask the prosecutor for a trial because at that point you were processed without a trial and then bring yiur claim

into it and flip it…..!!. He explains that even if you didn't write up the document that got him released on

probation, he signed it last and in contract law that means that it's his document and that he's fully liable for it

because he had the option to make changes to it, but signed it the way that it was. Karl Lentz tells Mark that he

should have made it crystal clear to the prosecutor and judge that he has no marijuana, just his medicine. If

anyone wants to say that he does have marijuana, let them put their hand on a bible and swear that's what he has

is marijuana , and that he, a man, is not allowed to have marijuana.

The cops take your car … file a claim against the man who took your car… he stole your car.. by

way of theft… He will say he is an officer..i don’t care if you are an officer what are u doing in another mans car?

Primary and foremost you owe a duty and obligation not to cause harm to your fellow man. Did you enter that

man cars without his permission…? Then you are liable!!!

The only time the warrant works without a bond is if we’re BOUND (if we’re “defendant” or

“citizen” etc.). but because we’re not part of this big happy family/nation, I’ve got my own family/nation, so I don’t

recognize your warrant.

Don’t file any idols (flags/seals/symbols/crests etc.)

 When ur selling your car privately and its $5000.. ask the man to get a bond for $5000 and if the

bond is called in because he didn’t pay.. then the bondsman can chase u around. If u don’t do this u could be left

with just a few payments on a vehicle and the person could write your car off and now you have to chase this guy

into court toget a judgement and then a warrant in debt. Save yourself the headache get a bond..

The bondsman sets his own rate.. they have to work that out with the bonds man..

334 | P a g e

And then u can start accepting payments without using the bank and its can be set up as a

private contract so government can’t even look at it.. set fine for disclosing the details of the contract to anyone

other than the two parties signing the contract.

Understanding void judgements Void judgment just means it never existed. That nobody has the

jurisdictional capacity to make such a judgement against I the man. And I can’t be held liable. File a void judgement

in the same court the judgement was first placed on us. We basically make a claim that they had no jurisdictional

authority to make such a judgement against I. the other side can challenge our belief, that the judgement they had

rendered against I was a legitimate judgement and should stand as true. We’re asking the same judge that he has

no jurisdiction over us. Don’t play around with void judgements, don’t do appeal courts. Pull them into the court

of record with a claim.

Presscopy hearing - Don’t use this term…just use the word order or just notice the individual and

ask him to answer to your claim. ie. tell the clerk that “i” would like to place a notice with the court i would like for
you to summons the defendant to appear and explain why he should or shouldn’t appear let him demur let him

answer… send him a notice…”look dude u stepped on my toes here is the bill see exhibit a ( the hospital bill) here is

the itemized statement bill see exhibit b and i want compensation of this much money see exhibit c ( how much

you want) it is also a preliminary hearing a week before the trial..this is where one sits in the judges chambers and

work out the rules and claims and arguments. presscopy is an old term …it’s more like a demur

Demur

DEMUR, verb intransitive [Latin To stay or delay.]

1. To stop; to pause; to hesitate; to suspend proceeding; to delay determination or conclusion.

On receiving this information, the minister demurred, till he could obtain further instructions.

2. In law, to stop at any point in the pleadings, and rest or abide on that point in law for a

decision of the cause. Thus, the defendant may demur to the plaintiffs declaration, alledging it to be insufficient in

law; the plaintiff maydemur to the defendants plea, for a like reason.

DEMUR, verb transitive To doubt of.

DEMUR, noun Stop; pause; hesitation as to the propriety of proceeding; suspense of proceeding

or decision.

All my demurs but double his attacks.

How to handle a lien

335 | P a g e

If one feels someone has placed a lien on you in error. One can require a hearing and they can

make their presentment to the court… if someone says u have to pay child support. write back saying that you only

have access to only 30 dollars a month and if there is anything else of value in which you will accept as payment for
the debt. (this make u stay in honor) In which 1. U claim is true 2. And that you believe i owe to you and now you

are claiming is past due.

Anyone comes at you telling you that you owe a debt.. you say what you can honestly pay…the

best u can do..and they have to accept that…because to do more would be to cause harm to i the man

This will stop garninshment this will stop warrant in debt.. all debts!!

Or you can conditionally accept upon proof of a verifiable claim

How to reclaim your status as a man File our notice of error: We made a mistake of answering as

a defendant before, because we do not have the capacity. We were just made aware that we’re not the defendant.

I’m sorry I wasted the court’s time and energy. At once time I thought it was a great benefit to be a defendant, at

present I maintain that I hold constructive possession of said article, constructive possession (one time I believed it

was in my best interest to possess this thing), now it’s become constructive trespass ( I wish it to be gone but it

won’t leave). I on this date believe I’ve erred back on (date). For I believe I was in a state of disequilibrium and

incapacitation to have made such a wish, for the go between is to bind my person with said article, so today

august.19th I wish for the immediate removal of said article from property and I.

From this date after whomever he or she sayeth said article is to remain about thy person will be

the causal agent of trespass to property and will be held liable for monetary compensation for damages. From day

forth (date) whomever comes and says that that article is to remain on my person on my property will be the

cause of trespass on me and my property and will be held liable for compensation.
 a man is a bondsman holding the bond for the defendant Like u holding the liability for your child

The quiet title is if you want to claim abandoned property effectively. Just to make sure it’s free

and clear before putting a lot of sweat equity into something only to find out someone else has a claim on it.

Trial of the regicides

Karl learned from this movie how to answer properly in court by watching the attourney who

was on trial was the only one would answer the court correctly by requiring leave of court and a pen and piece of

paper write down his answer and place his proper answer before the court..WRITE YOUR RESPONSE AND SIGN IT!!

when u say i require leave the judge will ask “How long?”… Remember only a man can require means To demand;

to ask, as of right and by authority. lawyers request because of their diminished capacity and status..lol

Irreparable..stay away form this word..it means they cant fix the problem with monetary

compensation because it would be futile. Stay awy from the four syllabels words

336 | P a g e

The quiet title is if you want to claim abandoned property effectively. Just to make sure it’s free

and clear before putting a lot of sweat equity into something only to find out someone else has a claim on it.

How to cross a border as a man Passport (at border patrol on a flight you have a contract) and

driver’s license are the same deal… if an agent ask u for one’s passport.. reply with the classic “do you require me

to have a passport to move form piece of land to another? So you as a man are going to interfere with my right to

move from this point on planet earth to over that gate to the other point on this planet earth? Rental cars have
contracts and operate under contracts that require driver licenses diminishing your capacity. They may sauy the

DHS is preventing you…well you say if i a man in this common law land drag this matter before the court your

telling me the DHS will testify that i cant cross!!?? And attorneys can’t make a claim in that court…remember the

plaintiff must appear and tell me i can’t go from point a to point b because i am causing harm…who am i in the

DHS causing harm too? Who is incurring financial loss?

Just claim the man status and opt out…

Understanding a common law lien Common law lien does not have to be recorded..its in your

head and if any one ask where it is recorded reply with” i will press it on the record wherever i am summons to

appear… It is the most superior lien you will ever have… This works well for protecting against credit card

companies macy’s things of that nature because you know they are never going to be able to press the record and

the man will be able too

How to remove a misdemeanor and the need for a third party impartial witness By having a

misdemeanor places on our name it’s causing I the man harm. If you don’t remove it I’m gonna have to make a

claim against the man who’s in control of that. If someone’s doing something/not doing something according to

their policies and procedures, and it’s doing I the man harm, then sure it might be their policies and rules put there

for benefit for society and general good, is still doesn’t negate the fact that it’s causing I the man harm, and that

you need to cease and desist immediately. Misdemeanors info can be found at vital statistics, so file our notice

with them first. If they respond back with “you need a court order”, at that point we pull the man out of the

person and say BOBBY at this point you’re telling me NO right? You a man and you understand that this is causing

me financial loss but you don’t care. So now you’re making yourself liable for causing me injury/financial loss. Is

that how you’re going to stand in court? I’m giving you fair warning, is this your story? Are you just gonna sit there

and follow orders knowing that you’re hurting a man? You have to stop. You’re intentionally doing wrong. You

can’t hurt a man just because someone told you to, and I’m telling you you’re hurting I a man!”
 Seizure is a good thing Seized means all lawful remdies were exhausted..ie trial by jury happened

and then seizure to place..so it’s a good thing… Stay away from Seized use robbed me of property and require the

immediate restoration of property. See exhibit A

SEIZE, verb transitive

1. To fall or rush upon suddenly and lay hold on; or to gripe or grasp suddenly. The tiger rushes

from the thicket and seizes his prey. A dog seizes an animal by the throat. The hawk seizes a chicken with his claws.

The officer seizes a thief.

337 | P a g e

2. To take possession by force, with or without right.

At last they seize The scepter, and regard not David's son. Milton.

3. To invade suddenly; to take hold of; to come upon suddenly; as, a fever seizes a patient

And hope and doubt alternate seize her soul. Pope.

4. To take possession by virtue of a warrant or legal authority. The sherif seized the debtor's

goods; the whole estate was seized and confiscated. We say, to arrest a person, to seize goods.

5. To fasten; to fix. In seaman's language, to fasten two ropes or different parts oof one rope

together with a cord.

To be seized of, to have possession; as a griffin seized of his prey. A B was seized and possessed

of the manor of Dale.

To seize on or upon, is to fall on and grasp; to take hold on; to take possession.

Notice of recission Rescission is an equitable remedy and is discretionary. A court may decline to

rescind a contract if one party has affirmed the contract by his action (see Long v Lloyd [1958] 1 WLR 753) or a

third party has acquired some rights or there has been substantial performance in implementing the contract.
 “I a woman (name) claim that there exists a contract also known as a safety plan between the

parties of (name) and Harrisburg social services department see exhibit A; I declare henceforth from this day (date)

the world is to take notice that said contract 1) provides no benefit to neither I nor my person and is a causal

source of harm 2) it lacks the capacity to compel performance from I or my person 3) it lacks the power to force I

or my person to be bound to perform under any and all of its terms and conditions.

Herein let it be known that if there be any man or woman who wishes to make his or her claim

known that said contract has capacity to bind I or my person let them come forth now with a verifiable claim and

deny said notice or forever hold their peace”

Yes there’s a contract, at one time I thought it was a good contract, now 1 I don’t see any

benefit, 2 there’s no one on this planet who can force/compel me to perform, 3 no one can bind me to it. if

someone believes they can bind me to it, let him make his presence known to court.

Who thinks they can harm a man and get away with it?

Make a claim. Give the public servant notice, putting them on notice, “back off and do your job

public servant, I do not require your services at this time. Let me alone”

Affidavits

Affidavits are just paperwork that’s filed but not sworn in on the record. It maybe one day one

man or woman may show up and verify en viva voce and press the record, until then it’s just the written word of

man, not the spoken word of man. So it’s not true. And can be denied. If I’m ordered to speak this into court I will.
 338 | P a g e

That’s why visa cards can give affidavits. If we ever see a 2D entity on affidavit, we just have to

say “I wish for the man or woman who sworn that affidavit to come to court and speak this into the record. If no

one comes forward then it is untrue.” This document has no spine, no backbone, it won’t stand up in court.

“affidavit” is their mystical magical word, let’s not use it. it’s legalese. For us, it’s a CLAIM. We

don’t want them to mistake us as one of them, by using their language. Always claim ignorance when they throw

legalese at us. “an affi what? Daffy duck?, oh you mean a statement that is true? You mean a claim?”

Non acceptance of your best effort payments means the debt no longer exists

Do our best effort to pay, they decline it, case closed. I tried to pay, you refused to take my

payment, see exhibit A, B, C etc. The UCC says its too but its not ours too use..U may [cf.] What else do they want i

sent a payment that they didn’t accept it. Case closed there is no more controversy.. They are trying to collect

something that doesn’t exist..the debt is gone because as soon as they said they refused to accept ISABELLA

DESANTOS one’s payment then its game over. One has the right to be let alone.

Motion for sanctions This is legalese.. this is to maintain status quo .. the existing order to be

held. And claim its frivolous and place sanctions for more silly behaviour. Order a lien or garnishment to be lifted

You get a lien… U don’t know this person who lien you up You write i am going to require u to come to court and

explain why you put the lien on me in the flesh as i have the right to face my accuser before the court where the

lien has been recorded. You write i order the lien to be lifted; if there is a man who wants to make a counter order

and said the lien not be lifted let him come before the court now or forever hold their peace. This holds true for

garnishments. You have the right to have a trial and face the man or woman who has liened or a garnished salary

thy property.
 Using a process server It is worth the money using a process server. They do great documents,

look professional etc.

How to restore your weed from the police Police officer take your property [weed] say “ i a man

require the immediate return of property, unles u bob(policeman) have a vested interest in it’ do you have a

receipt proving u bought some of this?or did the county buy some of this?or you think i didn’t pay taxes on it?

Show me your vested interest in it??!! Because i would be glad to compensate anyone with a vested interest” Tell

the cop” if you have a vested interest in this property bring a claim forward.” They may say “it’s a controlled

substance” show your ignorance and lack of understanding of their words and terms right form the beginning and

say” yes it was in my control in a plastic bad in my car until this man robbed its

339 | P a g e

was under my control” “how was it not under control was it out there in the public causing a

menace?” “it was under my control not out in public and under my authority my power” “it wasn’t out there in the

public hurting anybody was it?” “that’s my property”

“if any bank try to foreclose on any more people in new York state, the attorneys are gonna have

to come forth under oath and affirmation in open court, and swear that everything that the bank is saying is true.

And any attorney is going to be held liable to damages”

Private contracts, and declaratory judgements Small clause in contract to keep it private

“Anybody who brought this into a court has to pay a million dollars to the other party.” They want to settle this? It

must be settled in a private education process, not public.

 If the party doesn’t show up, get a summary judgement. In law, a summary judgment (also

judgment as a matter of law) is ajudgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily,

i.e., without a full trial. Such a judgment may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that

case.

No one can force anyone in a private contract to disclose anything publicly. Nobody can force

somebody to disclose the information of a private contract into the public regardless of what that contract is

about. No power on this planet can force open a private contract where the parties involved don’t want it opened.

i.e. marriage contract, the state can intervene because the state is part of the contract through marriage license.

If we have the ability to be there at the beginning to write the contract, put severe penalties into

the contract for disclosure. If we have a controversy that truly exists, between I and someone who really doesn’t

want to come forward and get involved, we’re just going to propose this complaint where we just whine about

something to a man in a black robe, and the man in the black robe just says “if this controversy ever appears in this

court, and if what you’re saying is true and accurate, HERE is what this court would decide: this ruling is not

binding on anybody, it’s just an opinion of what this court may do if these parties were to appear before us.” Then

we can take that and go to the other side to scare them, “this is what would happen if I were to sue you, so let’s

settle this privately”

Call their bluff, require the original note (contract for mortgage), the contract is the law, bring

the law before the court. Offer to pay in full if the note can be produced. Don’t accept a COPY, require the wet-ink

original. The copy will have all the routing numbers and fiken numbers are redacted (blacked out). Redact

rɪˈdakt/Submit verb past tense: redacted; past participle: redacted edit (text) for publication. "a confidential memo

which has been redacted from 25 pages to just one paragraph" censor or obscure (part of a text) for legal or

security purposes.
 We can go to the attorney general or the bank “where are those numbers? What did you do with

it? I want those numbers to see what was been done with this note through the commercial process to know what

you’ve done

340 | P a g e

with it. did you monetize it? did you securitize it? what did you do with the note? Who has

possession of it? has anyone made a claim on it to the insurance company? If so have the IRS or Treasury Dept.

claimed a loss?”

Dereliction of duty claim

So government worker isn’t doing their job… well file a claim.. “they have a duty and obligation in

which they ascribe too. This lady named Susy xxxx . Suzy xxxx has been in dereliction of duty in which she is failing

to perform a service or function in which society pays her to perform. By her failure to perform in a duty in which

she is acquiring public funds to do her job she is causing i a man harm”

When u drag them before a court u ask her before a jury how she can collect income from the

public and not perform the job asked of her?

U go to small claims court but don’t file a small claim..don’t let them minimize ones claim..it is

just a claim!!

Don’t call anyone..write letters!!! Use a process sever to even serve letters..

If ur car gets damaged because of pot holes. U can sue the city for being derelict in their duties!

Ascribe: verb (used with object), ascribed, ascribing.

 1.to credit or assign, as to a cause or source; attribute; impute: The alphabet is usually ascribed

to the Phoenicians. 2.to attribute or think of as belonging, as a quality or characteristic: They ascribed courage to

me for something I did out of sheerpanic.

DERELICT, adjective [Latin To leave.] Left; abandoned.

DERELICT, noun

1. In law, an article of goods, or any commodity, thrown away, relinquished or abandoned by the

owner.

2. A tract of land left dry by the sea, and fit for cultivation or use.

- Process servers, and using a box on your paperwork

Use a process server pay $50 and stop messing around.. using a box around your documents is to

say nothing is to enter this doc and nothing is to leave this document!! It’s a line of demarcation. No more marks,

its trapped, its sealed. U could fill the entire thing with squiggly lines if u didn’t trust the people.. U can also put

squiggly lines going down so that if anybody adds to the document u can see the wrote through the line..

Everything is negotiable…..

IF UR AR CHARGED WITH UTTERING A FORGED INSTRUMENT FROM A PUBLIC TRUST ALL U HAVE

TO DO IS SYA IT WAS DONE FROM A PRIVATE COMMON LAW TRUST AND SINCE IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE

REGISTERED AND THE BENEFICIARIES DON’T HAVE TO BE NOTIFIED YOU CAN GET OUT OF It.None is claiming harm

or loss or injury in common law!!

Dealing with garnished wages

341 | P a g e
 Send a letter to the pay roll lady and ask for the court order… if they don’t have a court order

then u make a claim against the company and sue.. because they have no right to release to anyone without a

court order.. so they are liable. They cannot discharge your property without consent! That was a contract

between u and them…and u have never allowed any third party interloper to administrate in my property

extra goodie...The City of London has a unique political status, a legacy of its uninterrupted

integrity as a corporate city since the Anglo-Saxon period and its singular relationship with the Crown….

The monarchy of the United Kingdom, commonly referred to as the British monarchy, is the

constitutional monarchy of the United Kingdom and its overseas territories. The monarch's title is "King" (male) or

"Queen" (female). The current monarch and head of state, Queen Elizabeth II, ascended the throne on the death

of her father, King George VI, on 6 February 1952.

This basically shows us that someone has titled The Queen which means she has been crowned

having somebody else has crowned her and you look no further than the crown and who is the crown well who

titled her last look at her coronation. She is the monarch of the crown but not the crown itself!!!

The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of

November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by

Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the

Queen,

so vatican titled her queen and that makes them the power. as they are the king and queen

makers!!!

London is a city state of who?? ROME

 rome is money and government that operates under the crown is operating under commercial

and that is admiralty law (canada and usa clearly do both are common law nations)

The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been

summarized as follows: 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and

revenues of the crown.

342 | P a g e

Man, a Creature endued with reason. Used in a lose sense, for any one;

a male-child grown to ripe age, and full stature; or a name of sex set against woman, Act.8,3.

This word [Man] cometh of the Hebrew “ish”, in respect of heat, valour, nobleness and dignity,

whereby man

excelleth; also of “Adm”, which signifieth earth. This latter is given to the baser sort, and the

former to the noble

sort of people, Psal.49.2. & 4.3. see Isa.2.9.

Also note, that man is sometime called enosh, which is, a doleful sorrowful man, a wretched one,

to put us in mind

of our misery, as Adam noteth our mortality, that we are earth, &c. Psal.8.4, & 9.20. where the

Original word is

Enosh, that is, silly or sorry man.

Both man and woman; better sex used for both sexes. Psal.1.1. Blessed in the man.

One complete and full of true knowledge of God, and of holiness, without any least want or

defect. Eph.4.13. To

meet together to a perfect man. In 1 Cor.13.11. It signifieth one of a constant and perfect age in

Christ. Also,

Eph.4.13. Where the Church is likened unto one man of ripe age, to declare the unity thereof,

and that every

 member of the Church feeling it self unperfect, must strive to full perfection, which doctrine

every one should

apply himself;

The body which is but one part of a man. 2 Cor.4.16. 'Though our outward man perish.' (see

temporal and eternal

man)

343 | P a g e

“Here then is the great difference betwixt the Temporal and the Eternal, That the one is the end,

and the other but

the means; the eternal is the end of man, but of the temporal, man himself is the end. The

eternal is man's utmost

perfection, and his perpetual happiness : the temporal only to be made use of, for obtaining the

eternal; so as the

eternal, being our end, is to be loved and desired for itself, the temporal to be made no account

of, but as it may

conduce to the obtaining of the eternal.

Interloper

INTERLO'PER, noun One who runs into business to which he has no right; one who interferes

wrongfully; one who enters a country or place to trade without license.

Don’t ask if u can take pictures u are a man u don’t ask this is your castle!! When asked “do you

have any Canadian or US money?” We say “why would I have bob’s or suzie’s or anyone elses’ money in my

possession? If I had someone’s money I’d give it back to them. I only have my own property.” They ask “how much

money do you believe is here?” (dodge it like a politician, don’t answer their question, answer the question we
wished that they would’ve asked) We say “all I know is that I exist, and only God knows what is true. I don’t know

what’s on that table. The only truth I know is God. How much money do YOU believe is there?” Don’t confess, try

to bring out the man. Keep it funny.

When u do get your claim in place an order asking her to show who the claimant is? (point to you

acknowledging you the man because only a man can make a claim)” Simply invite the mortage company to your

court and they will know the rules of engagement which are to produce the original wet ink signature note. U

don’t have to explain the rules to them…if they don’t produce it that’s there problem because you are going to be

requiring to see that original note!!

- Foreclosures

What debt? The debt is paid?

That places the burden on the banks to show they have incurred a loss..they can’t!! say you paid

of the mortage ages ago.. they will say that’s not true because this piece of paper say its not… reply “let me see

that piece of paper grow vocal cords and say that in open court? (you have the right to face your accuser)” ask the

lawyer if they will verify in open court that you owe them?” the lawyers will say “no way”

344 | P a g e

the other more honorable strategy is to pay them what you can pay? Make them an offer..and u

know if they refuse your best offer!!!!”” it will be your house..but stay honorable offer again your best and if they

still which i doubt they will..but if not take the house and get out of there
 the other tactic is if you blow this banking system they will come back and want land rights or

they will just bugger off to Africa and level the playing field out and turn America back in a third world

nation..( Speculation but food for thought when using this stuff) ( i personally would like to see it without the 1 %

in control…we might be pleasantly surprised)

If you have exhausted all remedies with them to pay your best effort!! Don’t forget your

equitable claim for all the sweat equity you placed in the home for security of the building and up keep.

If a bank is trying to sell your house… well they are in essence saying the own the house because

you can’t sell something you don’t own.. so then this is when you send them the bill for all the up keep!!

If they want to be owner and make you squatter…well turn yourself into a security guard and bill

‘em!!

When u file a clain your putting there complaint as exhibit A and exhibt B your taken property

and if its intangible like oyur reputation maybe placing an affidavit stating that your reputation was sullied by this

act” also get a witness to testify as to the changes that have happened to you as a result of this incident.like u lost

clients!! And show the cause and effect…get a witness!!show the actual loss!!

If your reputation was sullied you better prove it…bring in the someone who wouldn’t work with

you after the fact!! Don’t bring in no spread sheet because that speculation and circumstantial!!you need the voice

of man… Bring in the party that left you!!

So if you have employees just fire them without a reason!! The moment u have a reason they

have a lawsuit to counter it!! Don’t give them something to counter!!

 The banks probably have actuaries predicting when is the best time to pull this mortage scam off

again like they did 60 years ago because people are forgetful

Why don’t drug dealers ever find out the game all the way to the end? The play it up until the

cops arresting them? then what? You’re at the mercy of a lawyer and the system!? Unless ur jonh gotty…

People need to read their contracts and learn to modify them!!! Employeer give you a contract u

modify and send it back and make them not even see what they signed the names too… when he signs his contract

and doesn’t realize that if he tries to sue you that the contract screws the company instead!!

“How much money do you believe is there?” they are trying to get you to convict yourself!!!

Avoid the land mine!!

what’s in front of you is my property and i know that there isn’t any other man here that can

make a claim for that property”

345 | P a g e

They could just take the money and beat the crap out of you but some will play the game

honorably!

Regarding bonds and mortgage

If you have a mrogtage with a bank and you have used those promissory notes to pay off your

debt…make sure after they have received the payment to send them a letter with your needs …
 Hello bank,

i require for my records that the payment has been tendered in full and that there is no longer an

outstanding debt.

thanks

or ask them if Joe ( or whomever is the man or woman) debt has been satisfied yes or no? if no

why do they believe the debt is not satisfied after you sent them the following intrustment exhibit a [the

promissory note] ..it is really important to me so please get back to me immediately.

it hurts not to ask so ask!!! make sure you send them a blank envelop with a blank piece of paper

with an envelope with a stamp on it..

this is also a practice to be used when dealing with correspondence via the courts…just ask the

clerk to place everytihgn thing including your empty envelope with your address on it back in to a time stamped

court envelop and they will send it out in their outgoing box…

if you are dealing with several people make sure you sned them all their own personalized

version and cc everyone else.. yes they will get 3 letters of the same letters just with different names…

- Karl's encounter with the Canadian border patrol, and recognizing extortion

Government agents like to arrest u without pressing charges. Simply let them know u don’t need

a rest.. If the insist of giving u a rest… u say no that everything that i do form this point forward is against my will

and wishes and u will have to order me to to anything.I am more than willing to do what ever they want because

ur going to get compensated..because ur a man and i am a man and i have done no wrong.. and two u have a gun..
Ask them after its all said and done did i carry out all your orders? Get a nice yes from them and recorded it if u

can !! They have no power over you…they have power over visitors because of the immigration act so don’t take

the title of visitor citizen or traveler..always just be a man…

Karl thinks human and man is the same thing???

Officer think that immigration act or other acts give them the right but it actually gives them

duties and obligations..not rights to do wat they want over man … Does the immigration say what?? U mean it

reads? Did u create it? Do u know what that means? Do u want to be held liable for this a a man that ur sure it

applies to a man?

Show me where the immigration act expressly says u jim smith to touch me robin Mitchell??

When making a lawyer your co counsil don’t let them speak for you.. most will recuse

themselves..they were only there usually to throw u under the bus..

346 | P a g e

Some prosecutors want to threaten u saying if you do this now it will be beter thsn if u waut six

months when we are going to do whatever their threart is…IF THEY PUT IT IN WRITING AND TRY TO ALL U DO IS

FILE A CLAIM OF EXTORTION… In Canada they put it this extortion in writing. And if u fell for this u file a claim and

say u only acted before of the fear the extortion created… Plus all these deals are false because a judge can turn

around and sentence u whatever they want

When they are trying to sell your house at an auction make sure you go.. and witness that you

were the highest bidder not the bank and when the lawyer goes and testify differently because the bank won’t
appear and no will the lawyer , he will be up poop creek without a paddle because he will lie that he was at a

auction that you and 5 other witness will attest he wasn’t at!!

- Obstruction of justice charges “I have the right to remain silent until I have an attorney present

OR I see the charges brought before me, because I know anything I say right now can be used against me” we are

presuming that when the police lights are on we are under arrest. “I require to be taken in front of the magistrate

right now, wake him up”

If we get charged with “obstruction of justice” ask them who or what is “justice”. I didn’t see

anyone named Justice that I obstructed. How did I get in the way of him or her? Are you saying I obstructed a

word? Did I obstruct a verb or a noun? If I got in the way of justice, I’m sorry about that. Who’s this justice so I can

compensate them? I was just moving my property from point a to point b, and I sure don’t like it if someone gets in

my way. Show me the damages that justice incurred from my obstructing him or her. Please specify how much of

his or her justice did I obstruct? Show me the bill of particulars so I can compensate this justice, and show me how

you arrived at those numbers. How can I give you back some justice? (this is all in writing)

In the court room we are in public domain, so we are under public control. They have jurisdiction

of the area over wrong-doers.

Maritime law? What are we on a boat?

Does a snail need a permit to dig? They are self-governed as I am. Order me to speak so I can be

compensated, I don’t have to talk to any man I don’t want to.

If ur the primary lien holder..ur first in line first in time…so ask for the debt so that u can use it to

collect on your debt…this will freeze them in line..because ur goig to have the lien on your sister property which

they want behind ur established lien with her..go to the records office and make it official..ur beats there and u still
remain to be paid $1 million before they get paid..u ll testify in any court and ur sister will back it up..so how can

they get you if u block them…

Sherriff must execute warrants on debt or they become liable for the debt because they are

perceived to be working with the person…

If your government has tresites with another nation they can extridict you…but notice that native

amiercans never get extridicted because there is no treaty allowing such extridictions of their people whne they

run into the reserves!!

347 | P a g e

If u owe a ridiculous debt just make a payment plan that wont harm you!!!

When asked “do you have any Canadian or US money?” We say “why would I have bob’s or

suzie’s or anyone elses’ money in my possession? If I had someone’s money I’d give it back to them. I only have

my own property.” They ask “how much money do you believe is here?” (dodge it like a politician, don’t answer

their question, answer the question we wished that they would’ve asked) We say “all I know is that I exist, and

only God knows what is true. I don’t know what’s on that table. The only truth I know is God. How much money do

YOU believe is there?” Don’t confess, try to bring out the man. Keep it funny.

Where’s the law that says I a man have to confess and tell you everything I did? Where’s it say

that I a man have to take pen and paper and confess all money I made this year? I didn’t say CITIZEN, I didn’t say

TAXPAYER, I said MAN

Collection agencies …just do the same thing…look for a man or woman and then you are good…

…ie… who is the man or woman who is trying to communicate with me?
 Do sweat anybody listening to your phone calls in prison… u just tell them to testify in court as a

man…bob( guard listening in) do u say that me talking on the phone caused u some harm? He should say” NO the

united states doesn’t allow …” respond with” the united states who is the united states a man or woman???or can

u show me the injury harm or loss to the united states?”

If charged with assault apologize…..

An application form for a credit card is not a contract! A form can not have duel purposes as

every form has to have its only individual capacity. There is no such thing as a Dual prupose form in good law.. so

simply ask for the a”credit agreement” that u know u have never signed and can never produce and will send u

bugger off letter “i require that u send us the authorization for the standing order”

Much like insurance companies..they run a rackets of not actually providing u with insurance

protection because no contract was ever produced… now u can ask for the contract ( don’t stop paying or youll be

in dishonor) and bring the insurance company to court if they don’t produce the contract because u are actually

driving without insurance and they will say they cant find the contract when ur insurance gets to crazy for them…

use the same lawful play back at them and hold them liable for not providing a service and collecting money from

your bank account…give them 14 days to pay it back or this is Fraudulent Practices!! So how ever long u have had

insurance and paid it without getting the service u ask for the lump sum of it back…

KL – PERSON

348 | P a g e

KL: a person is a man, no, no, a person is a man, a man isn’t a person. A man could be on

Gilligan’s island, and live on a private island and he’s got no duty, he’s got no title ascribed to him in which he can
be imposed in which he fails to perform that duty. No. a person is a man, but no, a man does not have to be a

person.

Guest: a person is a man.

KL: wait, wait, like a man can be a judge, but a judge is definitely a man – person. Do you see

what I’m saying? A person is a man, a judge is a man, -

Guest: I heard on like one of your shows before, I think you are talking about like that show, what

you are saying there. But it comes down to what you believe. Right?

-----------------------------------------------

KL: I had to do that when Bali went to court. Because he kept saying he’s a man, and they kept

saying is the person known as, and he kept saying he’s a man. Is the man is the person – Oh, shit. They were like

fine if the person is failing – will not appear at this time, * they were like, like when’s the next date on the docket,

it was oh, hell no. I’m jumping up and I’m going to say no, the person known as Bali Mann is here. I said I aint

playing this f’ing game. I said, I’m not coming back to merry old England man, in 3 months, 6 months, I aint doing

it, we are getting it done today. So we jumped up or I jumped up and said can I aid and assist this court? They were

like who the hell are you? I said, oh I’m from the United States, I’m here to aid and assist the court blah, blah, blah.

And then I just basically said he is a person, there is a person known as Bali Mann in court today, and I said, but I

said I think, I’m trying to remember what her title was but she was the lady (legal adviser probably) I don’t know,

Bali probably knows what her title was. But (maybe a legal adviser if it was magistrate court, should be a legal

adviser) Well, ya, there was a jurist that sat up high, and a magistrate that sat on a lower level, ya, so she was

either a court clerk, right, she was somebody. But all I remember is when I, he is a person, but the only problem is

he is not a person within your legal society. I said you are not following me are you. Okay, a person is a man, who

owes a duty and an obligation * to society and if he fails within those duties or obligations within that society, that

society may impose upon him. I said the only problem is he does not believe that he is a person within the legal

society, he is in a society but it is not the legal society. And this is a legal matter before this court today, and this

court has no jurisdiction over the man. Yes they have jurisdiction over the person, but he is here to inform the

court that he is not that person. So, the lady is like okay, I’ll go tell the judge all this. And ya, tell him I wrote a law

dictionary, so * just doesn’t think I’m some crack pot *.

 You are there in person but not a person to their legal society. I am a person to society, but not

to your society. This is a legal matter, I am not a person within the legal society. And if you give me a chance I’ll

explain it to the court today. And like I said the judge knows what the f I’m doing.

KL: what Bali was doing in court was hysterical. It was funny, he got the one trick, pulled the

rabbit out of the hat. And then the judge want and said something else, and Bali, ah, he said I’m not a person I’m a

man. And Bali, again he pulled the rabbit out of the hat. And then the judge said something else. Had nothing to do

with the answer that Bali was coming up with next. And Bali, pulled the rabbit out of the hat, again. And it’s like,

Bali go to the next trick, go to the next trick, go to the next trick. And he didn’t know how to do anything other

than pull the rabbit out of the hat. It’s like holy shit. It’s like oh dude, he doesn’t know what the f – he’s f’ing

freezing up here. And then that’s when I jumped up. And I said may aid and assist this court. And the court clerk

said and who are you? I said I’m the next friend, I’m the next of – next friend for the man before you at this time.

And they said hum, and

349 | P a g e

how to wish to aid and assist this court? I said you’re looking for the person known as Bali raj

Mann? Yes. The person known as Bali raj Mann is now present before this court. Bali is like looking at me, like no, I

thought I was only man. I said shut the f up, I got this. I said I’m not coming back to f’ing merry old England cause

this guy is about to f’ing reschedule this trial in six months, and I aint coming f’ing back. It’s over today. I’m going

the f home. I didn’t come all the way over here to postpone this shit. I came over here to finish this f’ing thing now.

That’s the way I do things, I want it done and I want it done now. I’ve got to get back home, I have too much shit to

do. I aint go time to play this f’ing game with you people. So the court said how is this person before the court. The

person is before the court as well as the man. The person and the man are both before this f’ing court. HOW IS

THAT? If a person has duty and obligation according to his rank within a society, which he has certain duties and

obligations which he must behold, and if he fails within those duties that he ascribe to, the society may f’ing

impose upon him, such as penalties, fines, jail terms, death, whatever. The only problem is the person in whom

you seek, is not a member of the legal society. And I believe you have a legal claim, legal criminal complaint against
this man before the court this day. Yes. Well this man is an idiot at legalese, he does not speak legalese, he is not a

member of the legalese (LEGAL SOCIETY), nor is any of the other individuals in this court summons to appear today

a member of your society. Thank God their skin is brown. It’s going to make my job a lot easier to prove to this

court, that they are not proper Englishmen. They have no duty or obligation to act in any way, in any manner your

society subscribes, cause they do not ascribe to your society, because they are Punjabi. I guarantee you if they

violated or committed any crime against the Punjabi society, they will be dealt as such. But is said you have no

jurisdiction, control of Punjabi. Because he is not of your society. They are idiots when it comes to legalese. But yes

the persons you seek before the court, but persons of the Punjabi society, not of the legal British, UK, crown

society. Yes, they are persons, but not to your society, not to their society, but to their own society to which they

have done no wrong. And I said there is no man, that is going to come forth to this day and take that stand and

testify, today that I have done anything wrong to any man of any society. Persons yes, man no. and this is a

common law land? Yes. Than they invoke the right to have the f’ing man come forward move their f’ing case

against them. And that will never happen. So are they guilty as charged? You better believe it. But are they guilty

of doing anything wrong. No, they owe no debt to no man. And they have no debt to the crown, because they

can’t be guilty, they can’t hold a debt to the crown because they don’t even know the crown, the rules, the bylaws.

They don’t ascribe, there’s no document that’s going to prove they are a member of the legal society. (That’s right)

So then the judge is like, and who are you again? It’s like my name is Karl Lentz.

Person is a man / man is not a person

Judge is a man / man acts as judge

Homeowner's Association issues, your property on someone else's property

…u sign you’re liable…

 350 | P a g e

Section 9- definitions

Novation

The substitution of a new contract for an old one. The new agreementextinguishes the rights and

obligatio ns that were in effect under the oldagreement.

[Wednesday, March 09, 2016 12:51 PM] Joe Niklas:

351 | P a g e

<<< Why do you think he uses Man in the first definition and Men in the second?Joe Niklas,

Wednesday 12:51 PMMan exists in the present and has power...... men exist suspended in time, and are defined as

mankind. look up the word mankind see what you find.

[Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:58 PM] wayfinder:

<<< Be careful with the word 'addresswayfinder, Thursday 4:58 PM use service location ...

electricity, gas, water ..and so on

“19. In Black's Law Dictionary (6th Edition, 1990), the expression "property" has been given the

following meanings:
 Property: That which is peculiar or proper to any person; that which belongs exclusively to one.

In the strict legal sense, an aggregate of rights which are guaranteed and protected by the government. Fulton

Light, Heat & Power Co. v. State 65 Misc. Rep. 263, 121 N.Y.S. 536. The term is said to extend to every species of

valuable right and interest. More specifically, ownership; the unrestricted and exclusive right to a thing; the right

to dispose of a thing in every legal way, to possess it, to use it, and to exclude every one else from interfering with

it. That dominion or indefinite right of use or disposition which one may lawfully exercise over particular things or

subjects. The exclusive right of possessing, enjoying, and disposing of a thing. The highest right of man can have to

anything; being used to refer to that right which one has to lands or tenements, goods or chattels, which no way

depends on another man's courtesy.

"The German word for debt - 'schuld' - is the same as the German word for 'guilt'," he explains.

"To get into debt you have done something bad and that describes the German people's attitude quite well."

act (v.)

mid-15c., "to act upon or adjudicate" a legal case; 1590s in the theatrical sense, from Latin actus,

past participle of agere (see act (n.)). To act up "be unruly" is from 1903. To act out "behave anti-socially" (1974) is

from psychiatric sense of "expressing one's unconscious impulses or desires." Related:Acted; acting.

act (n.)

late 14c., "a thing done," from Old French acte "(official) document," and directly from Latin

actus "a doing, a driving, impulse; a part in a play, act," andactum "a thing done," originally a legal term, both from

agere "to do, set in motion, drive, urge, chase, stir up," from PIE root *ag- "to drive, draw out or forth, move"

(cognates: Greek agein "to lead, guide, drive, carry off," agon "assembly, contest in the games," agogos "leader;"

Sanskrit ajati "drives," ajirah"moving, active;" Old Norse aka "to drive;" Middle Irish ag "battle").

Theatrical ("part of a play," 1510s) and legislative (early 15c.) senses of the word also were in

Latin. Meaning "display of exaggerated behavior" is from 1928.In the act "in the process" is from 1590s, perhaps
originally from the 16c. sense of the act as "sexual intercourse." Act of God "uncontrollable natural force" recorded

by 1726.

352 | P a g e

An act of God is an accident which arises from a cause which operates without interference or

aid from man (1 Pars. on Cont. 635); the loss arising wherefrom cannot be guarded against by the ordinary

exertions of human skill and prudence so as to prevent its effect. [William Wait, "General Principles of the Law,"

Albany, 1879]

1803 – A Compendious Law Dictionary

Potts, Thomas

drover (n.)

early 15c. (late 13c. as a surname), agent noun from drove (n.).

drove

Old English draf, past tense and obsolete past participle of drive (v.).

drive (v.)

Old English drifan "to drive, force, hunt, pursue; rush against" (class I strong verb; past tense

draf, past participle drifen), from Proto-Germanic driban (cognates: Old Frisian driva, Old Saxon driban, Dutch

drijven, Old High German triban, German treiben, Old Norse drifa, Gothic dreiban "to drive"), from PIE root

dhreibh- "to drive,

353 | P a g e
 push." Original sense of "pushing from behind," altered in Modern English by application to

automobiles. Related: Driving.

vehicle (n.)

1610s, "a medium through which a drug or medicine is administered," also "any means of

conveying or transmitting," from French véhicule (16c.), from Latin vehiculum "means of transport, vehicle,

carriage, conveyance," from vehere "to bear, carry, convey," from PIE *wegh- "to go, transport in a vehicle"

(cognates: Old English wegan "to carry;" Old Norse vegr, Old High German weg "way;" Middle Dutch wagen

"wagon;" see wagon). Sense of "cart or other conveyance" in English first recorded 1650s.

I found a cool definition of Common Law in a 1765 Dictionary by Nathan Bailey: Common Law, is

either 1. Simply the Law of the Land, without any other addition. 2. The Law more generally before any Statute was

made to alter it. Or, 3. The King's Court, distinguished from both inferior Courts.

Constitution

CONSTITUTION, noun

1. The act of constituting, enacting, establishing, or appointing.

2. The state of being; that form of being or peculiar structure and connection of parts which

makes or characterizes a system or body. Hence the particular frame or temperament of the human body is called

its constitution We speak of a robust or feeble constitution; a cold, phlegmatic, sanguine or irritable constitution

We speak of the constitution of the air, or other substance; the constitution of the solar system; the constitution of

things.

3. The frame or temper of mind, affections or passions.

4. The established form of government in a state, kingdom or country; a system of fundamental

rules, principles and ordinances for the government of a state or nation. In free states, the constitution is

paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature, limiting and controlling its power; and in the United

States, the legislature is created, and its powers designated, by the constitution
 5. A particular law, ordinance, or regulation, made by the authority of any superior, civil or

ecclesiastical; as the constitutions of Justinian and his successors.

6. A system of fundamental principles for the government of rational and social beings.

The New Testament is the moral constitution of modern society.

354 | P a g e

Corporation

CORPORATION, noun A body politic or corporate, formed and authorized by law to act as a single

person; a society having the capacity of transacting business as an individual. Corporations are aggregate or sole.

Corporations aggregate consist of two or more persons united in a society, which is preserved by a succession of

members, either forever, or till the corporation is dissolved by the power that formed it, by the death of all its

members, by surrender of its charter or franchises, or by forfeiture. Such corporations are the mayor and aldermen

of cities, the head and fellows of a college, the dean and chapter of a cathedral church, the stockholders of a bank

or insurance company, etc. A corporation sole consists of one person only and his successors, as a king or a bishop.

propriety

play

noun pro·pri·e·ty \prə-ˈprī-ə-tē\

Simple Definition of PROPRIETY Popularity: Top 20% of words

: behavior that is accepted as socially or morally correct and proper : the state or quality of

being correct and proper proprieties : rules of correct social behavior Full Definition of PROPRIETY

plural pro·pri·e·ties 1. 1obsolete : true nature 2. 2obsolete : a special characteristic : peculiarity

3. 3: the quality or state of being proper or suitable : appropriateness 4. 4a : conformity to what is socially

acceptable in conduct or speechb : fear of offending against conventional rules of behavior especially between the

sexesc plural : the customs and manners of polite society

 355 | P a g e

Imprison. To put in prison; to confine a person or restrain his liberty, in any way.”;

“Imprisonment. The act of putting or confining a man in prison. The restraint of a man’s personal liberty; coercion

exercised upon a person to prevent the free exercise of his powers of locomotion.

Ex parte /ˌɛks ˈpɑrtiː/ is a Latin legal term meaning "from (by or for) [the/a] party". An ex parte

decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the controversy to be present.

Statute

STATUTE, [Latin , to set.]

1. An act of the legislature of a state that extends its binding force to all the citizens or subjects of

that state, as distinguished from an act which extends only to an individual or company; an act of the legislature

commanding or prohibiting something; a positive law. Statutes are distinguished from common law. The latter

owes its binding force to the principles of justice, to long use and the consent of a nation. The former owe their

binding force to a positive command or declaration of the supreme power. statute is commonly applied to the acts

of a legislative body consisting of representatives. In monarchies, the laws of the sovereign are called edicts,

decrees, ordinances, rescripts, etc.

2. A special act of the supreme power, of a private nature, or intended to operate only on an

individual or company.

3. The act of a corporation or of its founder, intended as a permanent rule or law; as the statutes

of a university.

356 | P a g e
 PETI'TION, noun [Latin petitio, from peto, to ask, properly to urge or press.]

1. In a general sense, a request, supplication or prayer; but chiefly and appropriately, a solemn or

formal supplication; a prayer addressed by a person to the Supreme Being, for something needed or desired, or a

branch or particular article of prayer.

no man is your god …you give the judge an order as you paid for oyur court and he is your

servant. And if he gives you an order you hand him a bill.. Deny simple means not true...it doesn’t mean they

don’t accept it..it means they are calling you a liar. So challenge them to say that in court that you are lying… If

someone ask u to be a defendant say thank you but I can’t accept that title as I am incompetent in legalese as I

don’t belong to your society and great harm will come to me if I do.

Mister, as a title of courtesy before a man's Christian name, mid-15c., unaccented variant of

master. As a form of address, without a name and with a tinge of rudeness, from 1760.

Jurisdiction

JURISDIC'TION, noun [Latin jurisdictio; jus, juris, law, and dictio, from dico, to pronounce.]

1. The legal power of authority of doing justice in cases of complaint; the power of executing the

laws and distributing justice. Thus we speak of certain suits or actions, or the cognizance of certain crimes being

within thejurisdiction of a court, that is, within the limits of their authority or commission. Inferior courts have

jurisdiction of debt and trespass, or of smaller offenses; the supreme courts have jurisdiction of treason, murder,

and other high crimes. jurisdiction is secular or ecclesiastical.

2. Power of governing or legislating. The legislature of one state can exercise no jurisdiction in

another.

3. The power or right of exercising authority. Nations claim exclusivejurisdiction on the sea, to

the extent of a marine league from the main land or shore.

4. The limit within which power may be exercised.

 Jurisdiction, in its most general sense, is the power to make, declare or apply the law; when

confined to the judiciary department, it is what we denominate the judicial power, the right of administering

justice through the

357 | P a g e

laws, by the means which the laws have provided for that purpose. jurisdiction is limited to place

or territory, to persons, or to particular subjects.

Deny

DENY, verb transitive

1. To contradict; to gainsay; to declare a statement or position not to be true. Wedeny what

another says, or we deny a proposition. We deny the truth of an assertion, or the assertion itself. The sense of this

verb is often expressed by no or nay.

Write a letter to your secretary of the state…” hey lady, I have a bond here that covers the bare

minimum 10 20 10 which is the minimum required insurance for the state of illinios for insurance. I don’t need you

licence, I don’t need your registration. Here is your notice and if a cop stops me I am going to give him your

number and we are going to work this out in two seconds. Or you can send me a letter stating I am free and clear

of any obligations . if you think you are going to burden me with all this nonsense or you think my position is not

true let me know.. ,y next letter will be to file a claim and drag u in to court and get this cleared up..” This might be

a notice u have to file… Notice if there is any paperwork or any orders stylized karl lentz petitioner or karl lentz

petitioner please address that to the clerk of the court ______(insert name) (not court clerk as clerk court is the

underling) as she is the one who has created that legal fiction as I gave her no authority to do so on my part…..she

is liable
 Fraudulent Practices (IFI Guidelines define) as: “Any act or omission, including a

misrepresentation, that knowingly or recklessly misleads, or attempts to mislead, a party to obtain a financial or

other benefit or to avoid an obligation.”

Deposition- In the law of the United States, a deposition is the out-of-court oral testimony of a

witness that is reduced to writing for later use in court or for discovery purposes. It is commonly used in litigation

in the United States and Canada, where it is called examination for discovery, and is almost always conducted

outside of court by the lawyers themselves (that is, the judge is not present to supervise the examination). In other

countries, testimony is usually preserved for future use by way of live testimony in the courtroom, or by way of

written affidavit.

es·top eˈstäp/ verb LAW past tense: estopped; past participle: estopped 1. bar or preclude by

estoppel.

Make sure you get a chance and really listen to Karl Lentz in his own voice express the concepts

via the Craig lynch series or the full talkshoe episodes. But after that I urge you to dig deeper and listen to these

noteworthy people

358 | P a g e

to help round out and give you more insight ..Bill Thorton, Richard Cornforth, Dean Clifford, Kurt

Kallenbach, The Informer, and Frank Collins .....I recommend u watch them in that order and don't ask me why.....

"Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or

strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different

centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of

oppression and resistance." Robert F. Kennedy June 6th 1966 Capetown

Now go and tell everyone you love…