Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(M. Ramos and D. Stern, personal communication). We next and yellow act together to induce black melanin. Upon misex-
evaluated the roles of these two candidate QTLs through a series pression of both yellow and tan by pnr-GAL4, we observe a
of genetic and molecular analyses. For brevity of presentation, dramatic black pigmentation within the pnr-expressing domain
we will largely focus on male pigmentation. (Figure 2H). These results suggest that the tan and yellow genes
act in concert to promote black melanin formation and that
The tan Gene Collaborates with yellow to Promote yellow function in black melanin formation is dependent on tan
Melanin Pigmentation activity.
In order to investigate the possible genetic contributions of
yellow and tan to pigmentation divergence, their roles in male tan and yellow Expression Diverged between
abdominal pigmentation were assessed. The yellow mutant D. yakuba and D. santomea
lacks black melanin pigment, but the remaining brownish- Given the severe pigmentation defects of tan and yellow
colored pigment is still patterned (Figure 2B). In tan mutants, mutants, we sought to compare the expression of tan and yellow
the striped and male-specific pigmentation is strongly reduced in D. yakuba and D. santomea using in situ hybridization. In the
(Figure 2C), and in the yellow and tan double mutant, the spatial late pupal abdominal epidermis, tan (Figure 3A) and yellow
pattern of abdominal pigmentation appears similar to the tan (Figure 3E) are transcribed in male-specific patterns in segments
single mutant while the intensity of pigmentation resembles the A5 and A6 of D. yakuba. However, in the unpigmented D. santo-
yellow mutant (Figure 2D). These results demonstrate that loss- mea abdominal epidermis, tan (Figure 3B) and yellow (Figure 3F)
of-function mutations in either gene result in dramatic reductions mRNA expression is undetectable, while both genes are
of abdominal pigmentation. expressed in association with bristle organs (Figures 3B and
In order to better understand the respective roles of tan and 3F and data not shown). Given the two genes’ mutant pheno-
yellow in pigment formation, we undertook a series of experi- types and conserved patterns of expression, these results
ments in which we ectopically expressed one or both genes in indicate that selective changes in tan and yellow regulation in
various genetic backgrounds. In yellow mutants, ectopic expres- the abdominal epidermis played an important role in the diver-
sion of yellow by pnr-GAL4 rescues the yellow phenotype only in gence in abdominal pigmentation between D. yakuba and
the overlapping domain of pnr expression and the endogenous D. santomea.
brown pigmentation (Figure 2F). That is, yellow expression alone These changes in tan and yellow gene expression could be
is insufficient to induce black pigment formation. However, we due to mutations that have occurred in cis and/or trans to these
found that ectopic expression of tan in a yellow mutant back- loci in the D. santomea lineage. To discriminate between these
ground produces ectopic brown pigment in the pnr expression possibilities, we examined gene expression in D. yakuba/D. san-
domain (Figure 2G). Considering the potency of tan to induce tomea hybrids bearing X chromosomes (and thus different tan
brown pigmentation, and the apparent inability of yellow to and yellow alleles) of different origins. We observed that the
induce black pigmentation, we tested the possibility that tan tan parental allele from D. santomea was expressed weakly
relative to the parental D. yakuba tan allele (Figures 3C and 3D), expression in the developing pupal abdomen (right column in
whereas the yellow alleles from both D. santomea and D. yakuba Figure 4A). These constructs, however, spanned all or part of
were expressed at high levels in hybrids (Figures 3G and 3H). the coding regions of two other annotated genes. We deduced
These results suggest that the divergence in tan expression in that the noncoding region between these two genes may contain
D. santomea is largely due to changes in cis to the tan locus, the CRE, so we made a shorter construct encompassing only
while the divergence in yellow expression is largely due to this region, termed t_MSE, and tested its activity. This construct
changes at other loci that act in trans. These findings are consis- drove robust expression of EGFP in the pupal abdomen, recapit-
tent with genetic analysis that indicates a large QTL near tan and ulating the native tan expression pattern (Figure 4B).
at most a small QTL near yellow (Carbone et al., 2005). Further- Because the t_MSE region was located in between two anno-
more, we have previously found that the D. santomea CRE con- tated genes, it was possible that the CRE governed expression
trolling yellow expression in the abdominal epidermis is fully of one or both of these genes and not tan. To test the necessity
functional (Jeong et al., 2006). While the loss of yellow expres- of this CRE for tan function in the abdomen, we made two rescue
sion may thus contribute significantly to the loss of pigmentation constructs that contained the entire tan region but that either
in D. santomea, this does not appear to be due to significant evo- included (t_rescue) or omitted (t_rescue[DMSE]) the t_MSE
lutionary change at the yellow locus. We will hereafter focus on region. The abdominal pigmentation phenotypes of t5 mutants
changes at the tan locus. are completely rescued by one copy of the t_rescue construct
but not by the t_rescue[DMSE] construct (Figures 4C and 4D).
Identification of the cis-Regulatory Region Controlling Therefore, the t_MSE region is required for the activation of
tan Expression in the D. melanogaster Abdomen tan, in both the male-specific A5 and A6 pattern and in posterior
In order to test whether tan is in fact the large X-linked QTL and to segmental stripes in both sexes, in the D. melanogaster
localize sequences within tan that may be responsible for the abdomen.
divergence in gene regulation and /or function, it was necessary
to identify the extent of the tan locus. Previous work identified the A tan Transgene Partially Restores Pigmentation
tan transcription unit (True et al., 2005) but no regulatory in D. santomea
sequences have been localized. In order to identify regulatory To test whether tan is the QTL, we inserted the D. melanogaster
sequences of the tan gene, we made a series of reporter con- tan transgene t_rescue into D. santomea (Figure 5). Animals
structs (JT1–JT5) covering the D. melanogaster tan locus bearing one copy of the transgene exhibited a small patch of
(Figure 4A). Two constructs, JT1 and JT2, drove EGFP reporter male-specific pigmentation along the posterior edge and midline
transformed into D. melanogaster. The orthologous D. yakuba test whether these substitutions may be sufficient to account
t_MSE (yak t_MSE, Figure 6B) directs GFP expression in the for the loss of tan expression in D. santomea, we made the recip-
male A5 and A6 segments. However, this particular D. santomea rocal ‘‘repair’’ constructs by replacing the A at site 272 with a T
t_MSE allele (san t_MSE[AA], Figure 6C) drives an undetectable and replacing both the A at site 272 and the A at site 323 with
level of expression of the EGFP reporter in the abdomen at the a T and C, respectively, in the san t_MSE (san t_MSE[T272] and
late pupal stages (90 hr APF or younger) and only about 11% san t_MSE[T272C323]). Reporter expression driven by the san
of the level of EGFP reporter expression as the D. yakuba CRE t_MSE[T272] element was detected in a subset of cells along the
at the time of eclosion (Figure S2). The differential activity of posterior edge of A6 segment (Figure 6H), and much higher levels
the two species’ t_MSE CREs correlates with the divergent ex- of and a more complete pattern of reporter expression were
pression of tan transcripts and melanin pigmentation between driven by the san t_MSE[T272C323] element (Figure 6I). These re-
D. yakuba and D. santomea and indicates that mutations in the sults indicate that the two base substitutions at sites 272 and
D. santomea t_MSE are primarily responsible for the loss of tan 323 of the san t_MSE CRE contributed the majority of the loss
expression in D. santomea. of CRE activity and tan expression in the D. santomea abdomen.
In order to begin to identify sequence changes involved in the While carrying out these experiments, we were operating
loss of san t_MSE[AA] activity, we aligned the sequences of under the typical assumption that these substitutions were fixed
t_MSE CREs from several species in the melanogaster species differences between the species. As it turned out, the functional
group. We selected three positions for further study because information we obtained was critical to our discovering that the
they fell within generally well-conserved regions and the evolution of the tan CRE had a more interesting and complex
D. santomea t_MSE contained a nucleotide substitution. While history, and that we were studying one of three alleles that had
manipulation of one site (position 404, Figure S3) had no effect, arisen independently in D. santomea.
manipulations at two other sites were particularly informative.
The nucleotides present at D. santomea positions 272 and 323 Three Independent Origins of tan CRE
(Figure 6A) were introduced into the corresponding sites within Loss-of-Function Alleles
the yak t_MSE element. The yak t_MSE[A272] element lacked Loss of abdominal pigmentation and tan expression are derived
activity in the abdomen (Figure 6F) while the yak t_MSE[A323] characters in D. santomea, but it is not clear from ecological or
exhibited reduced activity (Figure 6G), which suggest that these other evidence whether this loss was adaptive. One means of
sites are critical for tan activation in the posterior abdomen. To searching for the signature of recent natural selection is to
Mundy, N.I. (2005). A window on the genetics of evolution: MC1R and plumage True, J.R., Yeh, S.D., Hovemann, B.T., Kemme, T., Meinertzhagen, I.A.,
colouration in birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272, 1633–1640. Edwards, T.N., Liou, S.R., Han, Q., and Li, J. (2005). Drosophila tan encodes
a novel hydrolase required in pigmentation and vision. PLoS Genet. 1, e63.
Nelson, H.B., and Laughon, A. (1993). Drosophila glial architecture and
10.1371/journal.pgen.0010063.
development: analysis using a collection of new cell-specific markers. Rouxs
Arch. Dev. Biol. 202, 341–354. Wittkopp, P.J., Vaccaro, K., and Carroll, S.B. (2002). Evolution of yellow gene
regulation and pigmentation in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 12, 1547–1556.
Nielsen, R. (2005). Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu. Rev. Genet.
39, 197–218. Wittkopp, P.J., Carroll, S.B., and Kopp, A. (2003). Evolution in black and white:
Orr, H.A., and Betancourt, A.J. (2001). Haldane’s sieve and adaptation from genetic control of pigment patterns in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 19, 495–504.
the standing genetic variation. Genetics 157, 875–884. Wray, G.A. (2007). The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations.
Pennings, P.S., and Hermisson, J. (2006). Soft sweeps III: the signature of Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 206–216.
positive selection from recurrent mutation. PLoS Genet. 2, 1998–2012. 10. Wright, T.R.F. (1987). The genetics of biogenic amine metabolism, sclerotiza-
1371/journal.pgen.0020186. tion, and melanization in Drosophila melanogaster. Adv. Genet. 24, 127–222.