Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Claremont Area
Date: September 19, 2010
From: Jack Mills, Vice President Action
RESOLUTION
That the League of Women Voters of the Claremont Area support and
publically endorse the passage of local Measure CL.
DESCRIPTION
1
TOTAL $94,998,310 100.00%
Retire Debt: Measure CL funds will retire debt originally incurred for
capital expenditures, such as air conditioning the schools in the late
1990s and leases or purchases of copy machines, telecommunication
equipment and computers. The resulting savings in interest payments
will be used to help support academic programs and minimize difficult
cuts in staffing.
RATIONALE
2
• Sound fiscal and administrative policies which provide sufficient
funds for operation expense and capital improvement;
• California classrooms are among the most crowded in the nation now,
and a growing population will only worsen the situation if new facilities are
not built. The problem is complicated by new requirements for lower class
size, which are stretching existing facilities.
• Many of the existing facilities are old and in dire need of repair, and
most still need to be wired to accommodate the teaching and use of new
information technology.
3
• Proposition 39 requires local districts to list in advance the projects that
will be paid for, and to have independent financial and performance audits
done to ensure that the money was spent as promised.
Cost to Taxpayers
4
personal income paid in taxes but below the US average for the
percent of personal income devoted to K-12 education. Meanwhile,
California spends 53% more per capita on corrections than the national
average. A long-term policy of locking up young adults instead of
educating them can only lead to further downward spiral.
Critics of Measure CL claim that bond funds raised ten years ago
through local Measure Y were mismanaged. In fact, some promised
projects such as renovation of the high school theater and building a
new elementary school on the La Puerta site were not accomplished.
School site renovations, other than at Vista del Valle, did not go as far
as planned.
Measure Y funds were not wasted. They were spent on the construction
projects promised in the Measure Y campaign. There were no
superfluous or unplanned projects added later, other than what was
required by law or as a result of unforeseeable contingencies, for
example, the extent of necessary asbestos abatement or the condition
of electrical or structural components inside the walls were in some
cases not known until the wall was open-up during construction.
5
• Electrical panels
• Electrical conduit
• Water and sewer lines (witness problems in City of LA when
these lines age and spring leaks)
• Seismic shut off valves for gas lines
• Automatic fire alarm systems
CHS theater: After Measure Y passed, the theater planning group came
back with a much more ambitious project then had been included in
the Measure Y design. This required additional fund raising, bumping
the project from one of the first to be done to one of the last. Then
CUSD ran out of money due to cost escalation of construction supplies
mentioned above.
New elementary school at La Puerta: this project was delayed for two
reasons.
1) A large amount of regulation regarding environmental planning
issues (e.g., working out flight paths from all nearby airports to ensure
that the site was safe from potential air disaster; working out a
thorough traffic safety plan with City Engineer for how students would
be dropped off and picked up); and 2) soil contamination was
discovered under the parking lot (probably insecticide or other
chemical storage) from previous agricultural use of the land. This soil
contamination was fixed. These necessary delays pushed CUSD into
the cost escalation period and thus ended the project.