Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scand J Caring Sci; 2012; 26; 349–354 (HADS) and the Beck Depression Inventory – second edi-
tion (BDI-II) were employed to estimate the patients’
Anxiety and depression in obese and normal-weight
symptoms of depression and anxiety.
individuals with diabetes type 2: A gender perspective
Results: An association between T2DM, obesity and
Background: Obesity is a problem that is increasing depression was observed in both genders. More than one
worldwide, leading to an increased incidence of type 2 in three women and one in five men with T2DM and
diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Depression is more common obesity exhibited symptoms of anxiety or depression. In
among individuals with diabetes, and they are more likely the normal-weight group, the females presented more
than non-diabetic individuals to experience emotional symptoms of anxiety than did their male counterparts.
problems. People with both T2DM and obesity bear an Conclusion: In primary healthcare, the fact that both obese
additional emotional burden, which affects their quality men and women with T2DM are at increased risk of
of life. anxiety and depression is an important finding, which
Objectives: To describe the prevalence of symptoms of must be recognised and considered in the course of pri-
anxiety and depression in groups of obese and normal- mary healthcare consultations. Meeting the unique needs
weight individuals with T2DM who are undergoing pri- of each individual requires an understanding of both lab-
mary care and to investigate possible differences between oratory data and the individual’s emotional status.
the groups and between genders.
Method: Three hundred and thirty-nine patients with Keywords: anxiety, depression, diabetes mellitus type 2,
T2DM from nine primary-care centres participated in a gender, obesity, patient, primary health care, questionnaire.
cross-sectional study (n = 180 + 159). The response rate
was 67%. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Submitted 6 May 2011, Accepted 30 September 2011
The direction of the association between T2DM and people with T2DM and normal weight (BMI of 18.5–25)
depression has not been fully elucidated (9). Various who were between the ages of 30 and 75. As the procedure
researchers have obtained varied results. Both psychosocial allowed an equal number of individuals in both groups,
and biological factors may be involved (8). Some and the number of obese (BMI of 30–40) people in the
researchers argue that depression and being diagnosed register between 30 and 75 years with T2DM was much
with diabetes are associated (10). Another report suggests greater than the number of normal-weight people, every
that diabetes and depression are related regardless of third individual in this group was selected. This procedure
diagnosis and that depression may not only be induced by provided 255 individuals exhibiting obesity and T2DM and
psychological distress caused by the diagnosis of T2DM 248 individuals exhibiting normal weight and T2DM. The
(11). Being diagnosed with T2DM has been demonstrated mode of treatment and the duration of diabetes were not
to carry little psychological impact, and diabetes is not considered.
predictive of emotional symptoms, such as depression or
anxiety (12). At the same time, some researchers have
Instruments used in the study
indicated that depression is a risk factor for developing
diabetes (12, 13) and that prolonged emotional stress and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Symptoms of depres-
anxiety have been suggested to increase the risk of sion and anxiety were measured using the Hospital
developing diabetes (14). Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (23). The HADS is a
Unhealthy behaviours, such as smoking, physical inac- self-reported rating scale that is designed to measure both
tivity and unhealthy diet, are more common among indi- anxiety and depression. The HADS consists of two sub-
viduals with diabetes and depression than in individuals scales, anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), each
with diabetes who do not have depression (15). Psycho- of which contains seven items on a four-point Likert scale
logical factors, as such wellbeing and eating disorders, (ranging from 0 to 3). The scores are categorised as
influence the possibility of losing weight or maintaining noncases (0–7), possible cases (8–10) and probable cases
weight (16). (11–21). The maximum score on each subscale is 21.
People with diabetes in combination with depression Robust screening ability and a high level of agreement
present a higher risk of developing complications (17). between individuals scores on the HADS and structured
When people exhibit both diabetes and depression, the psychiatric interviews have been observed (23). Strong
combination of comorbid chronic disease mediates a psychometric properties have also been demonstrated (24).
higher prevalence of depression (18). People who suffer
from diabetes complications have demonstrated a higher Beck Depression Inventory II. The Beck Depression Inventory
prevalence of depression compared with people with dia- – second edition (BDI-II) – is one of the most widely used
betes and without depression, (13) and, also, they indicate psychiatric rating scales for depression and was developed as
an increased risk of death from all causes (17, 19). an indicator of the presence and severity of depressive
Depression requires increased utilisation of health care symptoms. Patients respond to the scale by rating each
(20). symptom item with a score ranging from 0 (absent) to 3
Because of the emotional burden of depression, rec- (severe or persistent presence of the symptom). The BDI-II is
ognising depressive symptoms in individuals with diabetes scored by adding the ratings for the 21 items to yield a
is necessary (21, 22), and screening for depression in total score that can range from 0 to 63 (25). This
people with diabetes is recommended, but methods of instrument yields valid and reliable scores in a primary-
screening and intervention have not been sufficiently care setting (26). The scores from the BDI-II are classified
characterised (17). as noncases (minimal, 0–13), possible cases (mild, 14–19),
The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence probable cases (moderate, 20–28) and probable cases
of anxiety and depression symptoms in groups of obese (severe, 29–63).
and normal-weight individuals with T2DM who are
undergoing primary care and to investigate the differences
Statistical process and analysis
between the groups and between genders.
The results of this study are presented descriptively as
means and medians ± standard deviation. The Mann–
Material and methods
Whitney U-test was employed to analyse the differences of
mean between normal-weight and obese diabetics,
Patients and procedure
between women and men, between obese men and
All primary-care centres (PCCs) in an area of western normal-weight men and between obese women and nor-
Sweden were asked to participate in the study and nine mal-weight women. Statistical significance was defined as
centres accepted. From the local diabetes register, which a p-value of 0.05. The statistical analyses were performed
included information from the PCCs, we selected all of the using SPSS 18.0 software (IBM, New York, NY, USA).
30–40 Female
Ethical considerations
BMI 18.5–25
Female/BMI
The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee
p-value
0.106
0.052
0.010
of the Medical Department of Gothenburg University (691-
09).
BMI 18.5–25
30–40 Male
Male/BMI
p-value
Results
0.279
0.616
0.549
The mean age of the female normal-weight respondents
was 65.3 (SD of 8.8, n = 75), and the mean age of the
Female/
p-value
0.005
0.010
0.000
Male
obese females with T2DM was 62.6 (SD of 7.7, n = 66).
The mean age of the normal-weight males was 65.4 (SD of
Table 1 Differences in mean between normal-weight and obese diabetic individuals, as well as of males and females, as measured by the HADS and the BDI-II
7.1, n = 105), and the mean age of the obese males with
Mean/Median/SD
T2DM was 63.3 (SD of 8.5, n = 93). The response rate was
4.5/4.0 ± 4.1
3.9/3.0 ± 3.4
8.3/5.5 ± 8.1
67%.
n = 93
No differences between normal-weight and obese
Male
individuals with T2DM were observed in symptoms of
anxiety (measured by the HADS-A) or depression (mea-
Mean/Median/SD
6.1/5.8 ± 3.9
5.3/4.0 ± 3.6
13.8/13.0 ± 8.8
sured by the HADS-D). Significant differences were
measured in symptoms of depression measured by the
BMI 30–40
BDI-II with higher scores presented by obese individuals
Female
n = 66
with T2DM. When female and male individuals with
T2DM and normal weights were compared, significant
differences were observed in symptoms of anxiety (mea-
Female/
p-value
0.038
0.435
0.061
Male
sured by the HADS-A) among the females presenting
higher scores. Significant differences were observed
Mean/Median/SD
between obese females and males with T2DM in symp-
3.8/3.0 ± 3.7
3.7/3.0 ± 3.6
toms of depression (measured by the HADS-D and the
7.7/5.0 ± 8.0
BDI-II) and anxiety (measured by the HADS-A) with the n = 105
BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory – second edition; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
females displaying significantly higher scores than their
Male
10.7/8.0 ± 10.5
When comparing normal-weight and obese females with
5.4/4.0 ± 4.8
4.3/3.0 ± 4.1
BMI 18.5–25
Discussion
These results demonstrate an association between diabetes
HADS-A
HADS-D
Scales
that more than one in three women and one in five men
BDI-II (%)
Noncases 79.2 69.3 72.9 83.7 56.7 77.8
Possible cases 8.3 12.7 8.6 8.2 15.0 11.1
Probable cases 12.5 18.0 18.6 8.2 28.3 11.1
HADS-A (%)
Noncases 78.9 74.2 72.0 83.8 69.7 77.4
Possible cases 11.1 16.4 12.0 10.5 18.2 15.1
Probable cases 10.0 9.4 16.0 5.7 12.1 7.5
HADS-D (%)
Noncases 83.3 75.5 77.3 87.6 69.7 79.6
Possible cases 8.9 17.6 14.7 4.8 19.7 16.1
Probable cases 7.8 6.9 8.3 7.6 10.6 4.3
BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory – second edition; HADS-A, Hospital Anxiety and Depression
Scale-anxiety; HADS-D, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-depression.
with T2DM and obesity present symptoms of anxiety and (15). When the symptoms of depression remain unknown
depression. These results highlight a problem concerning and untreated, serious consequences may result, as an
both men and women with T2DM in Swedish primary association has been demonstrated between depression
healthcare that has not been studied previously. among individuals with diabetes and poor metabolic con-
trol (30). Also, people with symptoms of depression have
indicated difficulty in integrating advice regarding lifestyle
Methodological considerations
changes or medical treatment into their daily lives,
The HADS questionnaire is a useful clinical indicator of resulting in poorer metabolic control and increased risk of
depression and anxiety symptoms (27). The BDI-II is one long-term or short-term complications (10, 22, 31). In
of the most widely used self-rating instruments worldwide addition, poor metabolic control has been reported to
for the assessment of the severity of depression in everyday exacerbate depression in individuals with T2DM (10).
clinical practice, as well as in research settings. Impor- The risks of serious diabetes complications and mortality
tantly, the screening of depression does not diagnose are greater among individuals with depression and T2DM,
depression but only provides an indication of the severity which could be another consequence of failing to recognise
of symptoms over a period of time (28). These instruments depression in those individuals (19, 32, 33). Importantly,
provide important information concerning the emotional some researchers believe that this risk is possible to
status of individuals with T2DM for the primary healthcare manage, as treated depression decreases the risks of
without being disturbed of somatic symptoms. complications (33). However, other studies have indicated
When analysing results based on self-reporting, the pos- no significant effect on diabetes outcomes when treating
sibility of bias and over-reporting or under-reporting of data depression (31).
cannot be ignored (29). However, this possibility should not Exhibiting T2DM in combination with obesity leads to
influence gender differences. Complications of T2DM were physical limitations for both men and women (4), and
not taken into account in this study, which can be seen as a functional limitations have been observed to contribute to
limitation, as people with diabetes and complications an increased risk of developing depression (18). When
exhibit a higher prevalence of depression compared with healthcare professionals fail to identify depressive symp-
people with diabetes without complications (13). toms, they are at risk of not meeting the individual’s needs.
Clearly, individuals exhibiting T2DM in combination Obese women have reported that when their needs are not
with obesity carry an additional emotional burden of taken into account by healthcare professionals, they have
depression or anxiety. The combination of these diseases difficulty in handling advice regarding lifestyle changes,
reduces the abilities of individuals to cope with the resulting in feelings of guilt and shame (34). This difficulty
demands of daily life and decreases their abilities to self- may also be a problem for obese men with T2DM, as
care and undertakes necessary lifestyle changes. Depres- findings in our study indicate that even these men have
sion represents an additional burden for individuals with symptoms of depression. The reason that healthcare pro-
diabetes, and exhibiting both diseases is associated with fessionals are not aware of the men’s emotional status can
nonadherence to self-care (15, 22) and medical treatment be explained by the fact that the men do not express their
mellitus? Nat Rev Endocrinol 2009; Swedish manual, 2008, Harcourt unexpected causes of death. Ann Fam
5(12): 665–71. Assessment, Sandviken. Med 2009; 7(5): 414–21.
18 Pouwer F, Beekman AT, Nijpels G, 26 Arnau RC, Meagher MW, Norris MP, 33 Bogner HR, Morales KH, Post EP,
Dekker JM, Snoek FJ, Kostense PJ, Bramson R. Psychometric evaluation Bruce ML. Diabetes, depression, and
Heine RJ, Deeq DJ. Rates and risks for of the Beck Depression Inventory-II death: a randomized controlled trial
co-morbid depression in patients with with primary care medical patients. of a depression treatment program for
Type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a Health Psychol 2001; 20(2): 112–9. older adults based in primary care
community-based study. Diabetologia 27 Lisspers J, Nygren A, Soderman E. (PROSPECT). Diabetes Care 2007;
2003; 46(7): 892–8. Hospital Anxiety and Depression 30(12): 3005–10.
19 Egede LE, Nietert PJ, Zheng D. Scale (HAD): some psychometric data 34 Svenningsson I, Gedda B, Marklund
Depression and all-cause and coronary for a Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatr B. Experiences of the encounter with
heart disease mortality among adults Scand 1997; 96(4): 281–6. the diabetes team-a comparison
with and without diabetes. Diabetes 28 Sharp LK, Lipsky MS. Screening for between obese and normal-weight
Care 2005; 28(6): 1339–45. depression across the lifespan: a type 2 diabetic patients. Patient Educ
20 Katon WJ, Lin E, Russo J, Unutzer J. review of measures for use in primary Couns 2011; 82(1): 58–62.
Increased medical costs of a popula- care settings. Am Fam Physician 2002; 35 Leach LS, Christensen H, Mackinnon
tion-based sample of depressed elderly 66(6): 1001–8. AJ, Windsor TD, Butterworth P.
patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003; 29 Streiner DL, Norman G, eds. Health Gender differences in depression and
60(9): 897–903. Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to anxiety across the adult lifespan: the
21 Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Behavioral and Their Development and Use, 2nd edn, role of psychosocial mediators. Soc
psychosocial interventions in diabetes: 2001, Oxford University Press, New Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2008;
a conceptual review. Diabetes Care York, USA, 69–84. 43(12): 983–98.
2007; 30(10): 2433–40. 30 Lustman PJ, Anderson RJ, Freedland 36 Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse
22 Gonzalez JS, Peyrot M, McCarl LA, KE, de Groot M, Carney RM, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of
Collins EM, Serpa L, Mimiaga MJ, RE. Depression and poor glycemic comorbid depression in adults with
Safren SA. Depression and diabetes control: a meta-analytic review of the diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes
treatment nonadherence: a meta- literature. Diabetes Care 2000; 23(7): Care 2001; 24(6): 1069–78.
analysis. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(12): 934–42. 37 Thomas J, Jones G, Scarinci I, Brant-
2398–403. 31 Egede LE, Ellis C. Diabetes and ley P. A descriptive and comparative
23 Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital depression: global perspectives. Diabe- study of the prevalence of depressive
anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psy- tes Res Clin Pract 2010; 87(3): 302–12. and anxiety disorders in low-income
chiatr Scand 1983; 67(6): 361–70. 32 Lin EH, Heckbert SR, Rutter CM, adults with type 2 diabetes and other
24 Herrmann C. Screening for major Katon WJ, Ciechanowski P, Ludman chronic illnesses. Diabetes Care 2003;
depression in a group of diabetic patients. EJ, Oliver M, Young BA, McCulloch 26(8): 2311–7.
Psychosom Med 1997; 59(5): 559–60. DK, Von Korff M. Depression and
25 Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II increased mortality in diabetes:
Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edn.