Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TOPICS
ART. 2 AND 12
LAND
IPRA
CARP
FISHIRIES
5. MR. S is an owner of a registered chainsaw. he lent his chainsaw to MR. LE. WHO then used the
chainsaw for cutting, w/o permit, ipil and narra trees inside his private property. You are the
forester working with the DENR and received a report from a neighbor of MR. L. what must you
do under the circumstances?
a. I will report MR. L to the DENR and execute an affidavit as a witness
b. I will apprehend and use MR. L for violating the Revised Forestry Code and Chainsaw
Act.
c. I will sue Mr. S only for violating the Chainsaw Act.
d. I will sue both Messrs, L and S for violating the Chainsaw Act.
e. I will sue both Mr. L and S. for violating the Revised Forestry Code and the Chainsaw
Act.
f. None of the above
1. Affidavit
2. Confiscate the Chainsaw and Ipil and Narra
3. Documentary evidence –
a. Pictures of ipil and narra
b. Certification from the DENR or PCSD (if in Palawan). Containing (WON there
is permit)
6. Y Corporation occupied an area which is part of the Estrella watershed in Narra with the aim of
securing from the DENR an agro-forestry farm lease agreement, the Corporation plans to establish palm
oil and rubber plantations. The land is non-alienable and disposable. If you were the DENR CENRO, what
will be your decision?
1. File a case against Y corportaion for violating the revised forestry code
2. File a criminal case against Y Corporation for unlaful occupation of forest land/
3. Deny the application of Y corporation for an Agro-forestry farm lease agreement
4. Allow the application of Y corporation for an agro-forestry farm lease agreement because this
is allowed under existing forestry laws and regulations
5. Answer 1 and 3
Basis? – Constitutional Classification of land (Art. 12), Forestry Code.
8. Mr. Jose Pares is the owner of a 30-hectare piece of titled land in Sta. Cruz which a fully covered with
mangroves. He cuts one hundred pieces of mangroves in preparation for his establishment of a
fishpond. When apprehended by the DENR for violation of PD 705, he interposed the defense that the
mangroves came from his own titled land and therefore these where his personal property. Is Mr. Pares’
defense valid? State the basis of your answer.
Answer: NO. Under the fishires code, fishpond is not allowed. Also, under the forestry code
person cannot cut mangroves
9. Noel Sescon burned trees and bushes inside his private land to pave way for the establishment of an
orchard. In the process big Narra and Ipil trees were burned. Can he be sued for illegal kaingin? What
other violations did he commit, if any?
Answer. NO. Illegal kaingin is not the proper offense to be charge. There can be no illegal
kaingin in a private land. The act made by Noel constitute Illegal Logging in private property
under P.D. 705.
“Exactly, Francis. My favorite in this is the Social Justice and Human Rights Thank you
Francis”
b. 1. Illegal Logging
2. Destruction of Wild Life
3. Unlawful Issuance of Tax Declaration
4. Unlawful Survey of person without authority
5. Assault to an officer
11. Cite at least five (5) examples of forest use agreements or licenses which serve as authority to cut,
gather, collect, remove and possess wood, timber, lumber and other forest products.
d. Chainsaw owners who have no plans to use their chainsaws need not have their chainsaws
registered.
A. FALSE. Mere possession constitute a violation under Chainsaw Act.
e. DENR can institute administrative proceedings against involved in illegal logging activities.
A. TRUE.
13. Mr. Andrada was in possession of 20 hectares of land in Napsan since 1930. In 1940, the director of
lands sold in favor of DEF, Inc. the land occupied by Mr. Andrada on the ground that the same was
owned by the government of the US under the administration and control of the Philippines. IN the
same year, a certificate of title was issued to DEF. INC. MR. Andrada filed an action before the trial court
seeking: a) to declare himself the sole owner of the parcel of land he has occupied, b) annul the sale
made by the Director of Lands in favor of DEF, Inc. and c) order the cancellation of the certificate of title
issued to the company. Is Mr. Andrada entitled to possession of the land by virtue of his long-time
occupancy? (7 points)
5.1 Yes. Mr. Andrada is entitled to possession of the land under the Public Land Act.
5.2 No. Because Mr. Andrada did not apply from ta title over the land he occupied.
5.3. Yes, Mr. Andrada is qualified to acquire possession of the land because of his long-time
occupancy
5.4. YES. Mr. Andrada is qualifed because he is a Filipino citizen
5.5. Answer 5.1. and 5.3
14. Some one hundred fifty families of the Batak and Tagbanua Communites in Barangay San Rafael, PPC
are opposing the ongoing quarrying and gold panning activities of Z corporation inside their ancestral
domain because their consent was not secured, and such activities will destroy their farmlands and
endanger their health. Z corp. asserts that the indigenous community has no title or legal instrument at
this time and hence has no basis for asserting their ancestral domain title. Is the company Correct? (10
points).
Answer. No. Under IPRA law, although no CALT/CADT was yet release, Indigenous Community
has a better right over Z corp. and FPIC (Free Prior Informed Consent) is needed.
1. As of 2008, the CARP under RA 6657 has completed the distribution of lands to farmer
beneficiaries.
16. Who can tell me what are the arrays and powers of the LGC.
1. Enforcement
2. Regulation
3. Information
4. Revenue Raising
5. Policy Making
6. Zoning “Very important – Maam Anda”