Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEE1004
Unit 3
Flow through pipes
Laws of fluid friction
As such different laws are obeyed by the frictional resistance in the
laminar and turbulent flows
On the basis of experimental observations the laws of fluid friction
for two types of flows may be narrated as follows
Laws of fluid friction for laminar flow
Frictional resistance in laminar flow is
Proportional to the velocity of flow
Independent of pressure
Independent of the nature of surface in contact
Proportional to the area of the surface in contact
Greatly affected by the variation of the temperature of the
flowing fluid
Laws of fluid friction for Turbulent flow
V is the velocity
Minor losses
In case of flow of a real fluid, the major source for the loss of its
total mechanical energy is the viscosity of fluid which causes
friction between layers of fluid and between the solid surface and
adjacent fluid layer.
So the major loss of energy in pipe flow is caused by friction, It may
be computed by Darcy-Weisbach eqn.
It is the role of friction, as an agent, to convert a part of the
mechanical energy into intermolecular energy. This part of the
mechanical energy converted into the intermolecular energy is
termed as the loss of energy
The Minor losses of energy are those which are caused on account
of the change in the velocity of flowing fluid (either in magnitude or
direction)
When the path of the fluid is suddenly changed in course of its flow
through a closed duct due to any abrupt change in the geometry of
the duct then apart from the losses due to friction between solid
surface and fluid layer past it, the loss of mechanical energy is also
incurred
In long ducts, these losses are very small compared to the frictional
loss, and hence they are often termed as minor losses.
However in short pipes these losses may sometimes outweigh the
friction loss.
The source of these losses is usually confined to a very short length
of the duct, but the turbulence produced may persist for a
considerable distance downstream.
Example of some minor Loss
where hL is the loss of head. Substituting (p2 − p1) from Eq. (3)
into Eq. (4), we obtain
5
Loss of energy at the exit from a pipe (Exit loss)
7
Where k is
Although the area A1 is not explicitly involved in the Eq. (6), the
value of Cc depends on the ratio A2/A1.
For coaxial circular pipes and at fairly high Reynolds numbers.
Table gives representative values of the coefficient K.
If the value of Cc is not given then the head loss due to contraction is
taken as
Entry Loss
(a)
Solving Eqn. (a)…
V2= 1.113m/s
Q= A2V2=78.67 litres/s
Variation of Friction Factor
The flow rate and pipe diameter are given. One has to
determine the loss of head over a given length of pipe and the
corresponding power required to maintain the flow over that
length.
The loss of head over a given length of a pipe of known
diameter is given. One has to find out the flow rate and the
transmission of power accordingly.
The flow rate through a pipe and the corresponding loss of
head over a part of its length are given. One has to find out the
diameter of the pipe.
Example #3
2
Concept of Flow Potential and Flow Resistance
Consider the flow of water from one reservoir to another as shown
in Fig. The two reservoirs A and B are maintained with constant
levels of water. The difference between these two levels is ∆H as
shown in the figure. Therefore water flows from reservoir A to
reservoir B
Application of Bernoulli's equation between two points A and B at
the free surfaces in the two reservoirs gives
(1)
Where hf is the loss of head in the course of flow from A to B
Therefore, Eq. (1) states that under steady state, ∆H the head causing
flow becomes equal to the total loss of head due to the flow.
Considering the possible hydrodynamic losses, the total loss of head
can be written in terms of its different components as
where, V is the
average velocity of
flow in the pipe.
The velocity V in the above equation is usually substituted in terms
of flow rate Q , since, under steady state, the flow rate remains
constant throughout the pipe even if its diameter changes. Therefore,
replacing V in Eq.
(2)
∆H in Eq. is the head causing the flow and is defined as the difference
in flow potentials between A and B.
This equation is comparable to the voltage-current relationship in a
purely resistive electrical circuit. In a purely resistive electrical circuit,
∆V=R I, where ∆V is the voltage or electrical potential difference
across a resistor whose resistance is R and the electrical current
flowing through it is I.
The difference however is that while the voltage drop in an electrical
circuit is linearly proportional to current, the difference in the flow
potential in a fluid circuit is proportional to the square of the flow rate.
Therefore, the fluid flow system as shown in Fig. and described by
Eq.(2) can be expressed by an equivalent electrical network system as
shown in Fig.
Flow Through Branched Pipes
QA = QB =QC
If the total head available at Sec. 1 (at the inlet to pipe A) is
H1which is greater than H2, the total head at Sec. 2 (at the exit of
pipe C), then the flow takes place from 1 to 2 through the system of
pipelines in series.
Application of Bernoulli's equation between Secs.1 and 2 gives
H1 ─ H2 = hf
where, hf is the loss of head due to the flow from 1 to 2.
Recognizing the minor and major losses associated with the flow, hf
can be written as
(1)
The subscripts A, B and C refer to the quantities in pipe A, B and C
respectively. Cc is the coefficient of contraction.
The flow rate Q satisfies the equation
(2)
Velocities VA, VB and VC in Eq. (1) are substituted from Eq. (2), and
we get
Above Eqn. states that the total flow resistance is equal to the sum
of the different resistance components. Therefore, the above
problem can be described by an equivalent electrical network system
as shown in Fig.
Equivalent pipe
(1)
Solution- d= 371.8 mm
Pipes In Parallel
When two or more pipes are connected, as shown in Fig., so that the
flow divides and subsequently comes together again, the pipes are said
to be in parallel
Solution-
Example-9