Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CYBERSPACE
Mkhael Calvin McGee and Barbara Biesecker,
Univwsity of Iowa
John M. Sloop, Vanderbilt University
David J. Gunke
linois University
Afl righe ==med. Prinlcd in the TJ~tedStats of America. No part of this publication may
be wpraduced or &ansmi%& in any form or by any mems, eeldronic or mwhanical, h-
cluding photocopy, rwording, or any informa~anstorage and retrieval system, without
permission Inuvdgng from.the publisher.
Copy~ght632CEB3 by WmWiew Pressf A Member of t-he Persus Book Gmup
Published In 2001 In the United Stats of h e ~ c by
a Wahriew Pressf 5mO Cenkal Avenue,
Bautder, Colorado 80301-28n, and in the United Khgdom by VVesWiew Press, 1.2 Hid's
Cop% Road, Cmnor Hill, a f o r d OX2 S)fJ
Fincl us on the World Wide Web at w w . w e s ~ i e w p m s . c ~ m
'The pszper used in this publication me- the requiremen& of the h e r i c a n National Stm-
dard for Pemmence of Paper for Pdntd Libracy Materials 239.48-19%.
Contents
Acknowledgments
hmduc~an:
Prolegomena--Hadcing Cyberspace
2 Ars Metaphorica:
The Computer as a Device of Co
3 Vexitatem T ~ t a s i :
Virtual Reality and the Deconsmction of the Image
Hacking
Hacker: Originally, a compulsive computer programmer. The word has
efrolvd in meaning over the years, hang computer u*rs, hacker carries a
positive comotation, meaning anyone who creatively explores the opera-
tions of c~mputc?""
system. Rwently, it has taken on negagve c ~ m o t a t i o n ~
primarily ~ o u g chs ~ s i o with
n mehr.
Hacking Cyberspace
This (therefore) will not h v e been a bwk. Still less, despite appearances,
will if have been a cal_lec.t-ionsf "essays."
than cyborg. As a result, the final hack does not introduce the cy-
borg as some cataskophic crisis that could be resisted with any
amount of strength or conservative energy It simply locates and
points out a fundamental monstrosity that is already constitutive
of the system of humanism that it subsequently appears to
threaten. This monstrous logic is diately announced in the
chapter's title, Ecce Cyborg, which translates into the apparently
simple "behold the cyborg." This title, however, cites and makes
reference to Nietzsche" E m H m o (19619), a work which in turn
cites and makes reference to f""ilatersindictment of Jesus Christ in
the Gospel of John (19:5). Nietzsche's curious autobiographical
text not only presents "a different image of humanity" (Kaufm
1969, 204) that marks significant deviations from that of Western
onto-theology but, what is more important, demonstrates, as Niet-
zschefs subtitle indicates, "how one becomes what one is."Ac-
cordingly, Ecce Cybmg does not consider the cyb
strophic crisis that has recently come to threaten
form of technology. It merely points out a necessary monstrosity
that is always and already afflicting and deconstructing the con-
cepts of the human and technology. Therefore, it merely locates
and indicates this.
Conclusion
Hackers are not sloganeers. They are doers, take-things-in-handers, They
are tiho opposite of philosopf.lers:They don't wait for language to catch up to
them, Their argments are their actiom.
1. Philes are the primary means by which hacker activity is reported and
arckved. Wriften by hckers for hackers, ghiles are either posted onIhe in dis-
cussbn forum like Pkrack.cm or distributed in hacker p&licatiom like 2600 (cf.
note 3). Philes are not literal. recipes for haeking but comtitl_lterbsumds of recent
hacker operations, sets of basic i r n h c t i ~ mand ~ open invita~onsta additional
hacking.
2. This may be one reassn why publicatiom addresshg h c K n g and hackers
take the form not of theoretical treatises but of hdividual caw studies that exam-
ine pax"2;icularhacks or hackers. The seminal text on the subject, Levy's ((1984)
Hackers: Heroes of fhe Computer Revolution, for example, ckronicles Ihe people'
t e e h a l o e r and events involved in what he defines as the t h e e distinct phases of
camputer hacking: "The tme bckers of the MIT artificial intelligence lab in the
fifies a d sixties; the populist, less questered hardware hackers in California in
the seventies; and the yomg game hackers who m d e their m r k in the personal
computer age of the eighties" ( X ) , S i ~ X achro~cles
r of specific people and events
are pmvided in the accounts of phreaker~~ a neoXagism h a t names the illegal ap-
propriation and manipulation of the telephone system, and w h t Rosenbaum
(1971) initially call4 ""computer phreakers," the prots%e of what would be-
came the "outlaw hacker" that is W prevalent in raent literature on the subjed.
These texts provide biographies of individual phreakers or hackers like Captain
ch, the Mad Hacker, Kevin Mibick, m d Mark Abene; narrative accounts of
e expbits of hacker gangs like the Legion of Doom, the Masters of Deception,
and NuPrometheus League; and detailed twatment of partimlar hacks and law
enforcement responses like the 1989 crack of Apple s o h a r e , the 2990 Mart&
Luther King Day Crash of the AT&T long distance nework, and the %c
vice m d Chicago Task Force raids. The spaificity of ~ e s variouse texts i
diately evident in their titles: Cyberpunk: Outlaws alad Hackers on the Computer
Frontier (Haher m d MarkoE 1991), The Hacker CraeMom: Law and Disorde m the
Electronic Frontbr (Sterlhg 1992), Appraaching Zero: The Extraordinary Ulidmorld
of Hackers, Pihreakers, Vims Writers, and Kqboard C ~ m k a I (Mmgos and Clough
19E), Mastms of &lecqt.bn:Zllze Gang ThC Ruld Cyberspace (SIatalZa and Quither
1996), T k Fugitive Game: On-line uti;thKevin Mitnz'ck (Littman 1996), T k Watchmn:
m Tmkted Lqe a ~ dCrimes of Se&E Hacker Kmin Boulsen (LiBman 19971, @Lar$e:
The Strange Case af the World's Biggest Infernet Invasion. (Freedman and Mann
1997), Cybermrs: Espionage on the Intmet (G~nel1897), and Hachrs: Crz"meirt t-he
Digihl Sublime (Taylar 1W9).
22 PROLEGOMENA
3.2600 has long been r e c o g ~ z das the "backer" quarterly." The magazine's
name comes from the 2MGcycle tone that had been used by Bell Telephone for
switcEng long-distance phone calls in the late 1960s and early 19"7"as.Phreaker~~
like J o h Draper (a.k.a. Captain Crmckr), discovered and exploited this feature fio
hack the Bell system" semork,
4. On the difference bet-tveen catastrophe and momtrosi.ty; cf. Derrida (1974)
and Cdel(I139n).
5. Cb the stratem and intnicacies sf decsnstruction, cf. the Appendix.
T E R R A N O V A : T H E NEW
WORLDS O F CYBERSPACE
jected to the same treatment that the West handed out to all other
non-Weskm cdkzres" "(~ardarand &v& 1996,6). Like Fuller and
Jenkins, Sardar takes seriously the metaphors of the new world
and hntier, demonstrating that such metaphors import into cy-
berspace various information and ass tions about space, con-
quest, and power that are not without problematic historical
precedents. In this way, Sardar's text takes a traditional and ac-
cepted approach to the critique of metaphor, demonskating not
only the limitations of the metaphor's configurationbut exhibiting
its often unacknowledged connotations.
Despite this unique attention to the implications and r a ~ f i c a -
tions of the metaphors of new world and colonialism, the texts of
Fuller and Jenkins and Sardar inevitably encounter stmctural dif-
Eicul~esthat theaten to und their procedures and condu-
sions. Although both texts identify and critique the new world
metaphors circulating in and around cyberspace, they do so by
employing the very metaphors they question. For example, Fuller
and Jenkins (1995) state the following concerning the status of
their own dialogue: "This work is a confessedly exploratory at-
tempt at charting some possibilities of dialogue and c
tion" "(58, italics added). Fuller and J s's (1995) diseussron, ac-
cording to their own descriptions, e s the metaphors of new
world and coloniafism, which incl ong other things, the
concepts of exploration (59) and chartmaking or mapmaking
(66-67). The investigation of these concepts, however, is accom-
plished through a dialogue that readily confesses that it employs
the concepts of "exploration" and "cartography" as descriptions
of its own methodology. Consequently, what Fuller and Jenkins
address in their discussion is also a constituent of the way they
discuss it. In other words, they employ in their discursive practice
ors they endeavor to critique and submit to ques-
r complication is maifest in the subtitle to Sar-
darfs text, which employs the very imagery the text investigates
and contends. Nominating the essay the "Darker Side of the West"
puts in play the conceptual oppositions of white and black and
light and dark that are not only part and parcel of Western ideol-
ogy but inform the racist assumptions that Sardar critiques in the
traditions of European colonial conquest and cultural d
Consequently, Sardar, on the one hand, critiques the metaphors of
lightness and darkness that are appropriated from a specific Euro-
pean tradition and uploaded into cyberspace and, on the other
hand, is somehow compelled to use these very metaphors to de-
scribe the signif cmce of this critique. There is, therefore, a crucial
gap or apparent self-contradiction behveen the what and how of
the analysis, between what the text manifestly means to say and
haw if: is nanetheless canstrrained to mean (Norris 1982,3).
It is tempting to explain and account for these difficulties by
g them "practical contradictions." Doing so, however, would
ave the general effect of neutralizing the texts' analyses and un-
g their timely and insightful conclusions. The situation,
may be more complex and nuanced than it first appears.
For designating these occurrences with the name "practical con-
tradiction" already assumes that the metaphors of the new world
and the frontier can and must be surpassed through the discursive
practices of the texts that compose and coordinate their investiga-
tion and critique. In other words, such a decision presumes that
there already exists something like a purified form of literal or
nonfigurative discourse that is able to co cate the implica-
tions of metaphor without having to employ metaphor, especially
the metaphor that is submitted to critical evaluation. Recent work
inrhetoric and the philosophy of language, however, suggests that
the situation may be othenvise. Mark Johnson and George
LakofffsMetaphors We Live By (1980), for example, argues that
metaphors are not merely figures of speech or discursive decora-
tions but the very mechanism of all possible conceptual thought:
"Our ordinary conceptual system . . . is metaphorical in nature"
(3). If Johson and Lakoff are correct, and recent publications in
rhetoric and philosophy tend to affirm their general position,3 then
not only is the operative difference behveen the literal and
metaphorical critically suspended, but, as Derrida (1976) formu-
lates it, "there is nothing that does not happen with metaphor and
by metaphor" (8). Through the mobilization of this insight, the
analyses of Fuller and J s and Sardar do not diately re-
solve into practical contradiction but demonstrate the fact that the
TERRA NOVA 31
and other of an old world. In this way the new world is situated
under the conceptual d on of the old. In the new world, one
finds only what s/he to find and discovers only what one,
in advance, already desired to procure. Colurnbus, for example,
discovers only what he has come prepared to find. He is con-
fronted only with what he thinks he should encounter. Through-
out the Diario (1989) recounting the first voyage, Col
rous entries indicating that he was cefiain that his fleet
was situated just off the coast of China. For this reason, he records
his encounters with people he called "Indians," anticipates the dis-
covery of valuable oriental spices, and anxiously awaits the mo-
ment when he will meet the Grand Khan. His comprehension is
limited to a distinct cultural frame of reference erected by E m -
cenkic orientalism.4 This concept gathers the new world under the
logic of old world hegemony. The apparent formlessness of the
new frontier does not resist this operation. The new world, its veg-
etation, and its inhabitants are made to yield to the force of Euro-
Cyberspace is the swrogate for aXd colonies, the ""new continent" a&iEcialXy
meated to satisfy Westem man%imatiabXo desire to acqzrim new wealth and
riches.
Cathy: Hi Terry
Terry: Hi Cathy.
Cathy: Nice day for a quest!
Teny: It's always a nice day for treasure hunting. (275)
A powerful, central technology for achieving common vision and joint un-
derstanding must evenhnally emergeaand this technology, its primfy un-
diczrlying message perhaps Ihe fmdamental basic t r u t h of the "Perebai
Philosopkry;" must reach out to the entire human co
massive and witary W a g e of .the entire b d y of ha
were one giant living orgmism. The internatioml telecomunieatiom net-
work, witk its thousands of computers and ~ l l i o m of sopf.listicated users,
is certainly the medium for the realization of this linkage and unification,
. . .Through well-psogrammd international netrrvorkiing, we have the po-
tential to make our world divine. (%h
One should not be too quick to forget that this global "unitary
linkage" and "collective restoration" had also been the promise
of virtually every other form of co unication technology. Elec-
tric telegraphy, for example, entered nineteenth-century dis-
courses "not as a mundane fact but as divinely inspired for the
purposes of spreading the Christian message farther and faster,
eclipsing time and transcending space, saving the heathen, bring-
ing closer and making more probable the day of salvation"
(Carey 1989, 17). Similar millennia1 promises, in both religious
and secular forms, were circulated in the popular and technical
rhetoric of electricity (Marvin 1988), radio (Spinelli 1996), and
television (McLuhan 1995). The general contours of this techno-
utopian rhetoric had been articulated as early as 1852 in a work
entitled The Silent Revolution, which predicted the attainment of a
new social harmony due to "a perfect network of electric fila-
ments" (attelarlt 19"514,33)..
Despite these seductive utopian proclamations, the develop-
ment and experience of both the European age of exploration and
the history of tel unications technology has demonstrated
something quite ntrary. The European encounter with the
new world of the Icas, although situated and promoted as re-
demptive, has been all too often experienced as a form of invasion,
ocide. One generation after Col
the people and cultures that he called Indians
had all but disappeared through the importation of disease, armed
conflict, and systematic deportation. Although the new world
sewed as a resource for European utopian fantasies, these dreams
had a considerable price. Consequently, one culture's utopia has
often constituted another's enslavement and annihilation. Why
then, i f this i s the case, is cyberspace continually and unabashedly
connected to this lineage? Why isn't cyberspace haunted and com-
plicated by what Sardar (1996) calls the "darkside" of the Euro-
pean (mis)adventure of discovery? Fuller and Jenkins (1995, 59)
provide a compelling explanation. "I would speculate that part of
the drive behind the rhetoric of virtual reality as a New World or
new f r o n ~ e is
r the desire to recreate the Renaissance encounter
ica without gwlt:This time, if there are others present,
won't be human, or if they are, they will be other play-
ers, like ourselves, whose bodies are not jeopardized by the virtual
weapons we wield."
The tevra nova of cyberspace is assumed to be disengaged from
and unencumbered by the legacy of European colonialism, be-
cause cyberspace is determined to be innocent and guiltless.
What distinguishes and differentiates the utopian dreams of cy-
berspace from that of the new world is that cyberspace, unlike
the Americas, is assumed to be v i c ~ d e s sThis
. assurance, how-
ever, is naive and deceptive. "Cyberspace," as Sardar (1996)
points out, "does have real victims" (19). Although the virtual
terra nova contains no "indigenous peoples" who are conquered,
deported, or subjugated, the concept and technology of cyber-
space does already exclude a good number of people from par-
ticipating in its magnificent techno-utopia. As both a concept
originating in a particular genre of Western literature and an en-
semble of technologies developed for and demonstrated in video
games and computer simulation and internetworking, cyber-
space has been limited to a highly fic demographic. Recent
studies of Internet usage and telec nicatiions infrastructure
(Anderson et al. 1995; Hoffman, Novak, and Chatterjee 1996;
Wresch 1996; Katz 1997; Novak and Hoffmn 1998), for example,
have found that the majority of cybernauts or netizens are, not
surprisingly, Caucasian, upper-middle or upper class, and male.
Data associated with video games and cyberpunk science fiction,
both of which have been, critiched for their reckcula~on,of ado-
lescent male fantasies (Ffeil1990,89; Ross 1991a, 145), reveal de-
mographic percentages that are at least commensurate with
those studies if not significantly higher. As a result, cyberspace
has been and continues to be the privileged realm of white Euro-
pean culture. In this matter Barlow (Gans and Sirius 1991) did
not know to what extent he was right, with what exactitude he
had accurately described the demographics of cyberspace: "Cy-
berspace is presently inhabited almost exclusively by mountain
TERRA NOVA 45
Notes
I , On recent reevaluations of Colurnbus and the Colurnbian encounter, see
Tdomv (19811r), Hulme (19%)' Fuentes (19W), b p e z (1992), Rethinking Colurnbus
(1991j, Mamaday (19921, and Fusco and Gdrnez-Pe&% " b d i o Pirata: Col6n Go
Home!" in Fwcs (1W5). For critical examina-tjom of travel, expbra'tion, and ge-
ograpkry; see I-farvey (1969); Helm (1988); Enloe (1990); Leed ("1991 j; Clifford
(1992); Unwin (19%); Dathome (1994), especially chapter I, "Europe Invents a
New World"; Godlewska and Smith (1994); and Appadurai (1996). For an exami-
nation of sihlar issues in the "gmgaphy" of cyberspace, see Morg (1996) and
HiXXis (1996).
TERRA NOVA 53
2- Although Fuller and JenKns trace interesting parallels beWmn the vkhjlal
geogaphy of Nintendoa and the accounts of travels to and w i t h the Americas,
a more literal connection beween the rhetoric of the New World and vidm gam-
ing has b e n enacted by a rwent release from Smflower Interactive Entertain-
ment % h a r e , CmbH. The object of this gameptitled Anno 1602: ErschBlilg einer
Meuen Weit [Year 1602::Creation of a New World], is to discover a new world, take
control of its resourcles, and a d ~ n i s t e ar colony.
3. This proposal, despite initial appearances, is actually nothing ~volutionary.
It merdy psycholo@es a suspidon already articulated by Nietzxhe in an o&en-
quoted passage from "On Truth and Falslity in an Extra-Moral Snse": "What
then is truth"l mobile army of metaphors, meton-cs, anthopomorpEsm: in
n relatiom which became pwtically and rhetorically inten-
sified, metamorphosed, adorned, and after long usage, -m to a nation fixed,
c a n o ~ and
c binding; trutllrs are illusions of wKch one has forgotten they are illtt-
siom; worn out mebphorti which have became powerless to affwt the xmes"
(Quotd in Demida 1982,217')
4. Cf. Said (1978).
5. On colonialism and European expansion, see Amaldua (1987), Morris
(1988), Chakravorty Spivak (1988), Trinh T. Minh-ha (19891, Giroux (1992),
Bhabha (1994), and Fusco (1995). A good intrduction to and survey of &sues in
po&coloniaI stzldies can be found in PlshcroM, Griffiths, and Tifin%Post-6olon.iaf
Studies Reader (195). A good introduction to issues surromding etbmentrkm
and m a r e d cultures can be found in F e r p o n et al.%Qut There: Mrgr'nalimfion
and Contemporaly Culturcls f1990).
6, Gibmn not mly did not own or h o w how to operate a persoml computer,
but wrote the entire text of Neurromncer on a m n u a l twewritec
'7. For a comprehemiveexaxninaGon of the cdtwal politics of mathematics and
gwmety, sm Eshop f19"35).
8. A smtaind examination of this appmach to VR is gravid& in Chapter 3.
9. Vice President Al Gore (19991, for e x a m p l ~has simplified the problem of
fechnal~gicalplcl"vikge to a ma%erof access to teleco catiom equipment and
~ w i e e sThis
. redudion is iately evident in the first a&iele of his "Digiital
Dalaration of Independence": "We must h p r o v e access to twhology so that
everyone on the planet is within walking dktmce of voice and data telecomu-
nications sewices within the next drtcade. Rght now, sixv-five per cent of the
worl&s houwholds have no phone sewice, Half of t-he world" population has
never m d e a phone call" "(14). Although unequal access is a considerable prob-
lem, it is not the only somce of techolo@cal privilege. For more on this issue, see
Chapter 5.
10. For examples of a l t e m t i ~ postcolonial
e~ employmats of cyberspace and
information technolomr see Haraway (199119), Nelson (1994), Sandoval (19952,
Todd (1W6), and Gdmez-Pefia (1997).
This page intentionally left blank
ARS N E T A P H O R I C A : T H E
COMPUTER AS A D E V I C E
OF COMMUNICATION
Transmission
Xations exist and d e v e l o r a l l the symbols of the mind, together with the
means of conveykg them though space and preserving them in time. It in-
58 ARS METAPHORXCA
eludes the expression of the face, at;t-i.t-udesand gclshnres, the tones of. the
voice, words' writing printing, railways, telegraph, telephones, and what-
ever else may be the latest acMevement inthe conquest of time and space.
Cyberspace: The realm of pure inEormation, Hlhg like a lake, siphoning the
jangle of messages h a n s f i ~ i n gIhe physical world, decontamhagng the
natural and urban landscapes, redeeming them, saving them from the
chah-dragwg buitldozers of the paper indwtry from the dies4 smoke of
c o u ~ eand
r post off'ice trucks, from the jet fuel f m e s a d clogged airports,
from billboards, trashy and p ~ t e n t i o u sarchitecture, hour-long freeway
commutes, ticket Xines, and cbiked subways . . . from all, the inefitiencies,
palflutiom (chemical and informtionaf), and cornxptiom aHendant to the
process sf moving idormagon attach& to Ihz'ngs-&oan paper to brain*
across, over, and mder the vast and b w p y surface of the ea&h rather than
le.t-C.hgit fly free in the soft h i 1 of electrons that is cyberspace. (3; italics in
oriwal)
the fact that interacting over a distance cost very much more than interact-
ing with those close at hand meant: that we lived aw lives in
and most ac~vitywas within these confines. For alrnast any ac~vity,one
could draw a came of frquency of interaetiom by distancepand the shape
of the curve would show a rapid faUing off with distance. hcreashgly now
at least one of the causal factors beEnd that cunr+namely, cost of long-dk-
In 1848 James L. Batchelder could declare that the Almighty himelf had
constructed the railroad for missionary purposes and, as Samuel Morse
prolphesied with the first telegraphic message, the purpose of the invention
was not to spread the price of pork but ta ask the question "What hath God
wrought?" This new technology entered American discussians not as a
mundam fact but as divinely inspird for Ihe puvoses of spreading the
Christian message farther and faster, ecliipsing time and tramending space,
saving the heathen, brhging closer and making more probable the day of
salvation, (Ifi-II7)
ARS BETAPHORICA 173
Media techologies that have largely been tied to the "t-ransportation" view
of communication . . . were developed to overcome space and time, The
computer, in particular, is an "eficiency" maeEne, purporting to ever in-
measkg speed. But udike t h s e techalogies, the computer used for corn-
municagon is a t e c h l o g y to be understmd from the "ritual" view of csm-
municagon, once t h e and space have b e n overcome (or at least. rendered
surmountable) the spur far development is comec.t;ion, lhkage. Once we
can surmount time and space and ""be" anywhere, we must choose a
""where" at W&& to be. (32)
Conclusion
We can say with genuhe and strong conviction that a particular form of dig-
ital computer o r g a n i z a ~ ~with
n ~ its grogram and its data, constitutes Ihe
dynamic, moldable mdiurn that can revolutiaPrize the art of mdeling m d
that in so doing can improve the effectivmess of commtxnieation among
people so much as perhaps to revolutionis that also,
and ritual are themselves nothing other than models of and for
unication. As Carey (1989) s arizes it, ''our models of
nication consequently crea t we disingenuously pre-
tend they merely describe. As a result our science is, to use a term
of Mvin Gouldner%,a refle~veone. We not describe behav-
ior; we create a particular corner of culture ture that deter-
s, inpart, the kind of co ~caSiveworld we fia;bit" (32).
Although Carey recognizes that such an approach may be per-
ceived by some scholars as less than scientific, he maintains the
opposite, arguing that it is only through this reflective method that
scholarship becomes sufficiently attentive to the complexities of
nication and cdture.
Second, this reconfiguration of the role and function of com-
munication will necessarily affect and transform the customary
relationship situated between computer technology and the texts
that supposedly represent and report on it. If one affirms the cul-
tural approach to communication, then the various words,
images, and discourses addressing technology cannot be under-
stood and employed as mere representations of some indepen-
dent and extant object. On the contrary, they constitute models of
and for the object in question, producing the various things they
are said merely to represent. As a result, the textual maneuvers
and discursive elements that are used to describe, discuss, and
debate technology can no longer be treated as mere conduits for
unicating information about something but comprise po-
tent mechanisms by which different versions of technological re-
ality are prototyped, maintained, and even contended. The
metaphors of transmission and ritual, for example, do not merely
represent the process, operation, and significance of computer-
mediated communication. They are already involved in manu-
facturing the reality of co unication one will want to say they
merely signify Metaphor, therefore, is not a mere verbal embell-
ishment or illustration. It constitutes a mechanism of significant
epistemological and ontological power. It can, for instance, de-
termine the relevant problems that come to be assigned to a tech-
nology dictate the kind of questions that can be asked of it, and
90 ARS METAPHORXCA
1. In mengoning this polysemia, Derrida is not arguhg for any new under-
mication but merely repeating an imight that had been avail-
able since the Pn;id-eighteenthcenbry Benis Ederot, for example, provides the
following definition in the Eneyelopedz'a: "Communication: a term with a great
number of meaPringsM(Magelarl:1696, xii-i),
2, Although the orignal, double meaning of the word commzcnicat..ion has gen-
erally been forgotten by mers of the English languaget it does persist in copates
of the word in other languages. In Polish, for example/ the n o m bmunihcja in-
dicates both commmication as u n d e r s t d in contemporary English usage and
m d e s of tramportation, including roadways, the railroad, and systems of mass
transit.
3. &e wodd have to admit that a sidlar evaluative criteria is always and al-
ready evident in the traditional consideration of metaphor: B e c a u ~metaphors
are also forrnulatd as a kind of bansportation, they are usually evaluated for
their ability to convey accurate information about something with little or no
noise. Consequently, the demonstration/eva1uation of the transportation
metaphor, like this one here, concerns measuring the rela~veektiveness of the
metaphor to convey accurate information about the process and hnction of com-
munication while minimizing the intrduction of noitje, which hers the poten6al
to distort the message and understanding.
4. Strictly speaking, it is a mistake to iden.tii@Ihe inEormation superkghway
with the Internet. According to a January 1996 study published by the United
States Advkory Corncif on the Matioml Information En&as&uctwe(USAC-NII),
"the Xnfoma~onSuperkghway is more than the Enternet. It is a series of compo-
nents, includhg the collection af public and p&vate high-sped, interac.tive, nar-
row/ and broadband nemorks that exist t d a y and will emerge tarnomow" (13).
Conaquently, the information superhighway, although irtcluding the Enternet, is
a braada and mare comprehensive concept. Despite this clarification, the popu-
Xar and academic presses h v e , almost without exception, continued to w the
name "Sormation super&ghwayNas a sponym for the Internet.
5, It should be noted that this asmiation follows a well-established precedent,
Nineteenth-century electrical engheers, for example, often cornpar4 the power
92 ARS METAPHORXCA
grid and telergraphic neworks to the system of railroads (Mawin 1988). A similar
comparison was employed to describe early forms of computer networking
based on the mainframe. A. g w d illwtration of this comparison can be f o n d in
PaBon" ((19861)chticism of the railroad nemork in his exa ation of the Ameri-
can highwq system: "The relatiomhip of the car to the road c m be understmd
by turning aromd a comparison tossed about in the world of eiectrodcs. The
mainframe computer, this analoe holds, is like the railroad: it is centralized, con-
trolled by large eompan-iesthat own both hardware and s o h a r e . The individual
can use it only by acceding to a fixed s c h e d d e ~ m e s h r i n g - m d is often s u b
jwted to being Toldd, spindled, and mutilated' by its operation" "(15).
6. The term information superlzig;hway is commonly credited to A1 Gore, who
claims to have invent& the p h r a s m m e ~ m ein 1979 (Core 195)$a,8). This claim
is most o&en justified and explain& by way of paternity. As Stefik (1996) de-
scribes it, "the Vice President is the son of AlbeIlt Gore7Sr., who served as senator
from Temessw from 1959 though 1971 and was a force b e b d Fderal Aid to
Hi&ways Acts, . . . Creating highways is in the Core faxru"lytradition" (xvii), The
o~gin of the phrase, however, like any iduential and popular idea, is not with-
out contention. Stefik (l96), for example, suggests that .the concept first entered
common currenrry with Robed Kahn, who in 1988 "proposed building a high-
s p e d natioml computer nework he often liken& to the hterstate Kghway sys-
tern" (xviz]. However, earlier emplopent of the &ghway metaphor c m be found
in Mmtin (1978), the w o n d chpter of wMch is en.E-itled"New Hi&ways," and
Smith (9972),which p r o p o ~ dthe eomtmction of an "elmtronic highway system
to facilitate the exchange of:Mormatian m d ideas" (83). Matever its genesis, the
information superEghway has become a powerful discurs-ivemodel in techrtical,
critical, and popular literature for explaining the function and significance of
computer neworking. As mllon (19%) points out, "the idormation super&gh-
way metaphor has remrkable status in the minds of people far beyond
the fairly l i ~ t cd f acadennic remarchers and w h a r e developers, be-
ing r e f e ~ n c dalmost daily in the news mtidia, in pXitica1 p r e e n t a t i ~ min~ ad-
vertisements, and so on" (336).
'7. For a critical history of the Atxtobah and its complw a s s i a t i o m with Nazi
politics and ideology we Ha&mut Bitamsky" dmumm.tary R&crtzsaufobahn,
8,For an examinagon of the denigration of the body in wxlitings in and about
~ b e r s p a c eSW~ aapt(?r5.
9, This convergence is also evident in the work of A1 Core during the tenure of
his vice presidency; The two projwts with which the vice president was assmi-
ated during lthe era of the Clinton admhistration were the orm mat ion super-
highway and various ef-fod to address the problem of global warming. The con-
vergence of thew two issues iS not an empirical accidental. If: is systemic and
dictatd by the v e v issues involvd. For a detail& examination of the logic of
corporeal redemption though the twhnology of:cyberspace, we Chapter 5.
10, The redempt.ion promised by the nework t a h s aim at and endeavors to re-
pair the damage caused by another system of tramportation-the automobile
and the superhighway. Imnically the liberatov promixs currently associated
with the computer nework had, at one timet also been axribed to the automobile
and the interstate Eghway. Rose (1973,l) provida a usefd rwollection:
ARS BETAPHORICA 93
By 1960, a r ~ o r d voice
d p r a r n i ~ dvisitot-orsto QneraI Motors' F u a r m a exhibit at
the 193"bew York World's Pair; foueem-iane e x p ~ s roa s
'baffic at d~.sipat&spmds of !33,75f m d 10miles m hour*
at a time, rode ammd GM"s 35,738 square foot mock-up of h b r e h e r i c a whae the
synchonized rmording in each chair conGnued. Automobiles fm f a m and feeder
roads wodd 'join the Motonnray at the same speed as cars &avdhg in the lane they
enter,%and moto&stswould be able to "make right and left turns at spwds up to 50
miles per hhur.21nurban amas, express Ini@ways would be 'm muled as to displace
oumoded business mtiom and undairable s l m areas." In ciGe themselves, men
would cunstmct buiXcS,*gs of "oreathtakhgar&ite&re; leaving space for 'smshine,
light, m d a i x T ~ asediom
t of farm Imd, "~ncht3d in blindhg smIightkccording
to an obsmer, were wder cultivation and nearly in fmit. Traffic, whCSther in rural or
urban areas, flowed dong without delays md without hazmds at intersections m d
railmad cmssings, W a can say what new horizom lie before us . . .?" asked the voice
on the?record, knew h o ~ z a min m n y fields, leadhg to new benefits for evclryone,
Unfomnately but not surprisingly, this irony has been lost on the majoriv of
advscates of the informagon superhighway.
11, For a detailed c3xaminaGon of cultural and htellmtual readiorms to the com-
pression of t i m and space in the m d e r n era, see Kern (1986).
l2 Sidlar prorniws for a technologically mediatd eradication of time and
space can be found in Brmn and teinbach {1991),Dizard (19973), and Bakis and
Roche (1997), the last of which begins with the following proclama~on:"It is
clear to most obsemers the world has s h m d astonishingly In. evident size driven
by rapid and sustained advances in trampoda~on,telecomnnunicatiom, and in-
fornation techolom" (I). The often unquestioned assumption that telecomtl-
s overcome distances in space and time not only comfitutes one of
k c a ~ o n will
the fmdamental principles of contemporary rewarch in c
o~ but is itseXf a general egect of the kansdssion view
13. On the complex hteraction be-t-cventhe ~ t o mvd rhetoric of the Euro-
pean "Age of Discove~"and the development of tehc mications system,
hcludhg CMC, see Chapter 1.
14, One of the principal myths d i ~ c t i n ga d a ~ m a t h gthis desire for global
rewification is the stsrgr of the Tower of Bab enesis 1li:l-9). According to this
narrative, human beings originally lived in ate proximity. and beeausr? of
this were able to cooperate with each other on a masshe buildhg projed. This
m d e r t a b g is eventually destroy& by Yahweh, who not only c o n f u ~theirs lan-
guage but disperscls the participants over the face of the earth. ft is at Babel, there-
fore, that geophljtsical distance is htro
human beings. Transpodation and tel
tempts to mediate this dispersion, d
spite this distance, For this reamn,
words of Maddox (1972), a projed that is concerned with what happens beyond
Babel, Dscussions of computer internemorking, in particular, draw upon the Ba-
belian wlyi;ttos t;o explain and justri@ their general unde&aEng. A. pargmlarly in-
stmctive example has been provided by Gore (19%):
ARS METAPHORXCA
It is impa&ant in discusskg t-he idamation age that we dixuss not merrtly teeh-
nology but the crssence of catiom. Bemuse from
m m i v Wr examplef not when t-raveIwas v e v
cation was p e w m l and d i m bet-wen fmaies, nei@bors, those
l improved, moving us all away
di&cuft. U n ~ recently,
I for e x m -
England, France or China or Rus-
sia, it meant sayhg good-bye to one's family that stayd in the Old MlQrldand never
h v h g a conversation with them agah, Mow we see Qlevision advmzi~mentsfrom
&ng for the lucrative business of n i m k g d r providing the
links b w e e n familiw that are se by the we-. I read a lit-
a family that was scaeered in many countris around the world,
whwe in more than a h u n d ~ ddigerat mmbers of the s m e
through the Zntemet. mey keep people infomed of birth and deaths and gradua-
tions, and &ldrm in dozens of c o m ~ e who s b v e nwer m& each other feel as if
they know each other and understand the bonds of family, Our world is being
brought closer toge*er. And it's hpo&ant in focusing on what k h e a d In
nicaGons to zero in, not just on technolou, but on what we use the tert-hology for,
(2-31
d s s the ra&cd
reality poses to
our most deeply held ideas of what c caean is or cm b. For
what is at stake inVR is not a new form of mediated representation,
but a specific kind of computer-generated simulation that decon-
shuas the metaphysical system that institutes and regulates the
very difference between representation and reality. I, therefore,
agree with Biocca and Levy (1995a) that VR may become too im-
portant, too wondrous, and too powerful to t disciplinary ig-
norance and passivity (vii).However, this chapter maintains that
l approach, considering VR as a me
tion, is itself part and parcel of this ignorance and passiviv
understand the impact of VR on the art
and science of co ation, we cannot simply pres
of representation but must consider how the concept and
our most deeply held convictions
ca~on me&a and me&ated
ema, TV, the separation of audience hom art was complete. VR ef-
fects a melding of experience and representation rather than the
separation effected by the proscenium" (2). This dissolution of the
g proscenium or paragon has been one of the distinctive
istics of early VR development. As Jaron Lanier has
pointed out on several occasions: "With a VR system you don't see
the computer a s gone" (Lanier and Biocca 1992,166).
It is this "invisibility of the computer," as Brenda Laurel (1991,
143) calls it, that renders the representations of VR virtually indis-
tinguishable from reality.
Under the conceptualization of the essential copy, VR does not
atic formulation that distinguishes the real from
tions, but operates within its logic, striving to
rate and nearly perfect reproductions. In this
way VR is understood as a technique of almost perfect
a flawless and transparent medium through which one sees and
comprehends the referent in its original presence. In VR, iconic
representation is not experienced as such but as the delegate of
something else to which the image defers and refers. As Marie-
Laure Ryan (1994) points out, "the 'virtual reality effect' is the
denial of the role of signs in the production of what the user expe-
riences as unmediated presence" (3).V R therefore, is often de-
scribed as an "interface that disappears," opening a doomay to
another world (meingold 1991,131). Understood in this way the
fundamental difference bemeerr VR and the other iconic media
(i.e., painting, photography cinema, and television) would consist
ineffectiveness, which is usually defined as the degree of achieved
"realism." A mark of quality in VR design, therefore, is the extent
to which the experience of a representation disappears as such and
the system "duplicates the viewer's act of confronting a real
scene" (Fisher 1981,94).2 In this way VR portends the creation of
the ul-tzimateco nication medium, promising to provide im-
ages of the real so perfect that for all intents and purposes they are
experienced as if they were the real thing.
The essential copy imaged through the "ultimate display" of
VR has prompted two responses, both of which follow the con-
tours of the Socratic assessment of i ~ t a t i o n On
. the one hand,
VR can be a tool employed for the sake of and in the service of
the real. For the scientific and engineering co u ~ ~ eVRs ,is, in
the words of Frederick Brooks (1988), primarily a means for
"grasping reality through illusion" (1). As an illustration of this
concept, Howard Rheingold (1991) describes the University of
North Carolina's (UNC) molecular-docking simulation, a haptic-
VR system that permits users to experience and to navigate com-
plex chemical interactions intuitively, learning molecular bond-
ing not by abstract formulas but through direct manipulation of
the molecules. Similar applications have been proposed in the
field of medical imaging to assist physicians in performing diag-
nosis and treatment pla g (Pimentel and Teixeira 1993). In an
interview with Rheingold, Stephen Pizer, a medical imaging re-
C, provides the following imaginative account of
the future possibilities of VR applications in the medical profes-
sion: "Once you are putting 3D virtual worlds in front of the sur-
geon or diagnostician, why not put them where they belong-
namely, in the patient, superimposed on where the organs are
located? One could imagine a situation where surgeons can see
their surgical instruments, can see the real tissue of the patient as
they operate, and can simultaneously see an augmented image
that allows them to see behind the blood and opaque surfacesf'
(Rheingold 1991,33-34).
Two proven applications of VR technology can be found in mil-
itary kaining simulators, like SIMNET, and architectural design
and walk-through systems. SIMNET comprises a network of tank
and aircraft simulators scattered across the globe that can interact
and perform maneuvers with each other: "In the computer-
generated battlefield displayed on the simulator screen, other
tanks and aircraft that appear are 'driven' by other crews in other
simulators, the data on their movements and actions passed along
the network so that all the simulated tanks and planes seem to be
space" (Woolley 1992,192; Rheingold 1991,360).
Architectural walk-through software facilitates the evaluation of
an edifice by placing designers and clients w i t h a v
VERITATEM XMITARI 103
ditional qualification that this artificiality not only does not refer to
a real referent but is utterly without any realistic attachments. Ar-
tificial reality, therefore, is neither image nor reality but something
other, something that is neitherlnor and either/or. It is another
name for simulation. lar emplopents of VR technology have
recently been explored and promoted by the Banff Centre for the
Arts (Moser and MacLeod 1996) and Penny (1994).
Simulation intervenes in the metaphysics of representation by
deconstmcting the binary opposition real/imitation. This decon-
smction comprises a double gesture that inverts the relationship
between representations and the "real world" and introduces a
new and undecidable concept that is displaced outside the very
system that had been inverted. As a result, simulation constitutes
a significant challenge to the concept of the "essential copy" and
the criteria of realism by which the technology of VR has been
evaluated, understood, and explained. Understood as a technol-
ogy of simulation, VR can no longer be restricted to the "2000 year
search for the ultimate display" or d d by the Socratic logic
that has substantiated m d hformed sentidy metaphysical
project. Consequently, VR is not necessarily a tool for grasping the
real through illusion nor a potentially dangerous delusion. It is
something other, something that is both more and less, and some-
at exceeds the metaphysical system that opposes reality
tion. This does not mean, however, that the ~me.Icicun-
derstanding of VR has somehow simply collapsed or been ex-
hausted. Indeed, the representational employments of VR will
continue to be valuable in physics, biomedicine, chemistry, ap-
plied mathematics, and such. What this does mean, however, is
ntal or representational employments of VR are
tural, unavoidable, and beyond question. Al-
though VR can be and has been employed to duplicate Western
metaphysics, it also exceeds this employment and in doing so in-
terrogates the hegemony of metaphysics by posing alternatives to
its rather restricted set of binary possibilities. Simulation, there-
fore, does not constitute a competing theoretical position that op-
tation. To do so would mean nothing less than a relapse
into the metaphysical oppositions that simulation always and al-
ready deconsbucts. Simulation, rather than simply being identical
with or opposed to tation, occupies a monstrous position that
places the entire structure and system of metaphysics in question.
As PfaubUard 3) points out, "The representational imaginary,
which both cu ates in and is engulfed by the cartographer's
mad project of an ideal coextensivity behveen map and the terri-
tory, disappears with simulation," and with this dissolution, he
concludes, "goes all of metaphysics" (3).
Conclusion
The true world-we h v e abolished. What world ELas rernahedxhlrte appar-
ent one perhaps? But no! With the true world we have also abolished the swarmt
one,
I. Although numerous texts have been published on the subject of W and ey-
berspace, Biocca and Levy's book is privileged here bwause it cansEti2utesthe first
monograph explicitly comecting v i m a l realiv to the disciphne of commu~ea-
tion*
2. This disappearance of the linterface and immediate experience of another
world is also one sf the at-t-ributesof fidion according to rment work in literary
theoy; see Rym (1W4).
3. According to Biocca, Kimf and Levy (1995), the "desire for physical tran-
xendence" (7) is one of the fmdamental ideologes animating the development
of VR. For a sustained examina~onof technolo@caltramendmtalism, see Chap-
ter 5.
4, For an extended treament of deconsmc~on,see the Appendix.
L I N G U A EX N A C H I N A :
COMPUTER-MEDIATED
COMMUNICATION AND
T H E TOWER O F B A B E L
culating power lies an inner core sprung from a seed planted two
centuries ago. . . . That initial germ for the birth of computers
started with the rationalist philosophers of the seventeenth cen-
tury who were passionate in their efforts to design a world lan-
guage" (36). Seventeenth-century Europe saw the development
of several projects related to the creation of a universal idiom. In
a 1657 publication, for example, Cave Beck proposed a Universal
Character, by which all the nations of the world may understand one
another's conceptions, reading out of one common writing their own
mother tongues. A similar pasigraphic endeavor was undertaken
by Athanasius Kircher in the Polygraphia nova et universalis ex
combinatoria nrte detecta (1663)' which proposed a system of writ-
ing in which "all languages are reduced to one." Eleven years
earlier, Francis Lodwick published The Groundwork or Foundation
Laid (or So Intended) for the Framing of a New Perfect Language
and a Universal Common Writing. This text not only proposed
a universal idiom to which everyone would have equal access
but also a perfected language that was "capable of mirroring
the true nature of objects" (Eco 1995, 73). Similar systems were
introduced by the Via lucis (1668) of Comenius, George Dal-
garno's Ars Sigrlorium (1661), and John Wilkins's Essay Toward a
Real Character, and a Philosophical Language (1668).
The seventeenth-century philosopher to which the computer
makes particular reference, however, is Gottfried Wilhelm von
. According to Heim (1993)' "Leibniz's general outlook on
language became the ideological basis for computer-mediated
unications" (93). This privileged status was canonized
by Norbert Wiener (1961) in the introduction to the text that orig-
inated the science of cybernetics. "If I were to choose a patron
saint for cybernetics out of the history of science, I should have to
choose Leibniz. The philosophy of Leibniz centers about two
closely related concepts-tha t of a universal symbolism and that
of a calculus of reasoningf' (12). The significance and interrela-
tionship of these two concepts had been su arized by Leibniz
in a 1679 dssive to the Duke of Hanoveu;w&ch addressed the in-
vention of an artificial, philosophical language: "For my inven-
tion uses reason in its entirety and is, in addition, a judge of con-
troversies, an interpreter of notions, a balance of probabilities, a
compass which will guide us over the ocean of experiences, an
inventory of all things, a table of thoughts, a microscope for scru-
tinizing present things, a telescope for predicting distant things, a
general calculus, an innocent magic, a non-chimerical Kabal, a
script which all will read in their own language; and even a lan-
guage which one will be able to learn in a few weeks, and which
will soon be accepted amidst the world" (Eco 1995, xii). The pro-
posed invention would accomplish two goals: it would provide a
thoroughly rational protocol whereby all debate and controversy
would be resolved through calculation, and it would establish
a universal writing that would be acceptable to all nations and
cultures. These two operations are necessarily interrelated. The
rational perfection of the idiom ensured that the new system of
writing was not arbihary and ambiguous like the "natural lan-
guages." Instead, this characteristics universalis was substantiated
by, and resided in perfect concord with, reason. It was therefore
appropriately suited to all particular members of that genus
that European philosophy had defined as animale rationale. Leib-
niz's rational calculus would thus be capable of overcoming the
confusio linguavum once and for all, for it "would compile all hu-
man culture, bringing every natural language into a single shared
databasef' (H& 1993, M).
In canonizing Leib as the patron of the new science of com-
mu~cationand conhol, Wiener (1961) ewoded this dream of a
universal and perfect language in the fundamental program (or
operating system) of computer technology According to Wiener ' s
esgmations, "kibniz's calculus ratiocinlador contained the seed of
the machina ratiocinatrixM-the reasoning machine or computer
(12). Universal language, then, is not a project to which the com-
puter has been applied but constitutes the very genetic structure
and fundamental program of the technology itself. For this reason,
on technologies, as such, have been de
ersal idiom that restores the earth to the
ditions that were allegedly d at Babel. Bruce %human (1988)
provides a rather explicit articulation of this promise:
LINGUA EX MACHXMA 123
Machine Translation
Shxdents of languages and of the structwe of Zanguagw, the logciam who
design computers, the eleckostic engneers who build and run them-and
spe&fieallythe rare individuals who share all sf these talents and imights-
are now engagcrd in. erecting a new Tower sf hti-Babel. This new tower is
not intended to reach to Heaven. But it is h o p 4 that it will build part of the
way back to that mythical situation of simplicity and power when men
could cammunicate freely together-
Beck's Universal Character, by which all the nations of the world may
understand one anotherJ$ conceptions, reading out of one common
wn'ting their ouln mother tongues (1657), Joachim Becher's Character
pro notitia linguarum universali (166l), and Gaspar Schott's Technics
curiosa (1664). Recent studies in MT, like Luigi Heilmannfs
"J. J.. Becker: Un Precursore delh Traduzione Meccanica" (1963)
and W. J o h Hukhinf" Machz'ne TransZcatio~:f i s t , Pmenf, Future
(1986), have recognized these seventeenth-century projects as the
precursors to contemporary efforts in MT.
Despite the ambitious aspiration of universal translation, most
contemporary MT products have been developed around lan-
guage pairs and are limited, therefore, to mediating behveen two
or more predetermined languages-for example, Systran (En-
glish/Russian, English/French, EnglishfGerman), Mt't4o (En-
glish/French), CITEC (ChinesejEnglish), and PENSEE (Japa-
nese/English). In these systems, which Reifler (1951) termed
specific MT (l), translation is accomplished through a transfer
module that directly links the two languages through a series of
steps specific to that language pair. Specific translation system, al-
though capable of providing acceptable output, experience signif-
icant complications when applied to more than two languages. For
n languages, this systems architecture requires n(n - l ) transfer
modules; consequently, a MT system for the nine official lan-
guages of the European Co ty would require seventy-hyo
separate translation modules. To address this limitation, which af-
fects not only translation efficiency but, more important, its ex-
pense, several multilingual systems have been designed employ-
ing a third, intermediate language, or interlingua. As Klaus
Schubert (1992) explains: "the n(n-l) formula is based on the as-
sumption that every source 1 ge is linked directly with every
target language. If these dir can be given up in favour of a
single, central represents combinatorial problem is re-
movedf' (81). For n languages, this alternative systems-architecture
anslation modules; consequently, a translation
official languages of the European Co
would require eighteen transfer modules, each language having
its own protocols for translating into and out of the hterlingua. In-
terhguas consist inboth natural languages that have been chosen
for convenience as an intermediary or artificial languages that
have been invented for the purposes of mediating linguistic differ-
m e . Booth, Brandwood, and Cleave (1958), for e
the use of a natural language such as English, a
sis of economics, that such translation systems would require not
2n kansfer modules but 2n-2. Ivan Guzmhn de Rosas has sug-
gested the use of Aymara, which Emeterio Villamil de Rada in
1860 argued was the proto-language spoken by Adam (Eco 1995,
346-347). BSO's (Buro voor Systeemontwikkeling) DLT (Distributa
o) system employs the artificial language of Es-
that this idiom combines the expressiveness nec-
essary for translating natural languages with the extreme clarity of
an artificial symbolic system necessary for automated processing.
Other artificial-language-based systems have been proposed by
Carnegie-Mellon University's Center for Machine Translation
(1996), Bell Labs, and NEC. And some rather speculative schemes
have suggested employing Klingon, the fictional language devel-
oped for Star Tvek and the most popular artificial language cur-
rently in use (Edwards 1996).
Although the use of an interlingua overcomes the limitations of
combination in multilanguage MT system, these intermediaries
have a distinct limitation. In relying on either a specific natural
language or an artificial one, the intermediary is set up a posteriori.
That is, the language that is supposed to mediate between all other
languages is either one of those languages or an artificial idiom
that is derived from empirical research on a specific natural lan-
guage or set of natural languages. In either case, the i n t e r h p a is
neither universal nor equally accessible to everyone. The transla-
tion system would privilege certain users, restricting all possible
expressions to concepts and logics that are germane to that partic-
ular idiom. Esperanto, for example, although formulated as a uni-
versal, international language, privileges native speakers of Euro-
pean languages from which Esperanto has derived its gra
vocabulary, and alphabet. The a postenoori interlingua, whether it is
composed of a nahral or artificial language, is 1
LINGUA EX MACHXMA 129
which' at the touch of a few buttons, can take any text in any lan-
duce a perfect kanslation in any other language
intewen~onor assistance. That is an ided for the
distant future, if it is even achievable in principle, which many
doubt" (1). The failures that have been experience in MT research
have not only led the discipline to pursue l
ly, specific MT of restricted text or ma
tion tools5-but have also motivated researchers to question the ba-
sic assumptions that had initiated and informed the discipline in
the first place. Man Melby's The Possibility of Language (1995) un-
dertakes a critical investigation se "failures" in order to sug-
gest new possibilities for reorg g and reorienting the disci-
pline. According to his assessment, MT has experienced significant
LINGUA EX MACHXMA 133
Postlinguistic Communication
Just as all men have not the same writing so all men have not Ihe same
spmh wmds, but mental experiences, of wKch these are the primry sym-
bob, are the same for all, as also are t h o things
~ of which our experiences
are the images.
but that by his own will he directs his mental concept in such a
way that it becomes known to the other" (991). The global net
would provide a conduit for this kind of direct intellectual interac-
tion. In this network, interlocutors would converse by directly
nicating their thoughts to one another, avoiding once and
for all the complications that have been associated with language
shce the Babelian conhsion,
The concept of spee&less, dire& neurological interaction, which
is rooted in Scholastic philosophy, has been uploaded into the net-
works of cyberspace by the novel that introduced the neologism,
WiHiam Gibson's Neurmncer. Gibson's protagonist, the console
cowboy Case, interacts with the global matrix and the world of in-
formation by directly jacking his consciousness into the network
through surgically implanted "Sendai dermatrodesff(Gibson 1984,
52). Case does not require any of the interface devices we com-
monly associate with computer-mediated co unication (key-
boards, mice, headphones, monitors, etc.). Instead, his disembod-
ied consciousness is directly wired into the neuroelectric fabric of
the global network (Gibson 1984, 5). In the cyberspatial matrix,
C a e is said ts nicate at the level and speed of thought it-
self. This ideal ut is no longer encumbered by the "meat"
of the body6 just as his co cative interactions are no longer
burdened w i the ~ materi language. Since the publication
of Neuromancer, "the desire to have one's brain patched directly
into cyberspace" (Branwyn 1993,1) has not only been a staple of
cyberpunk fiction but the promise of contemporary telematic tech-
nology. A 1997television advertisement for MCI, for example, pro-
motes the Intemet as a utopian enviro nt in wKch users are
liberated from the problematic constraints of embo
race, age, etc.), c nicating with each other "
This kind of technologically enabled "angelic speech" not only
promises to repair the cacophony of language experienced in the
wake of Babel but, like the tower itself, both approaches and
theatens the heavem.
This form of computer-mediated mind-to- d connec~ouris fa-
cilitated by brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies. Currently
there are two BC1 methodologies: electroencephalogram (EEG)
monitoring and implanted electrodes. EEG interface schemes em-
ploy systems that detect brain waves, trace changes in the wave-
form, and interpret these changes as c for computer
func~ons,I n i ~ awork
l in this area was by the U.S. Air
Force as part of the "Pilot's Associate" project. One element of this
five-part system was something the air force calle
which was "research aimed at developing better c
even integration between computers and humans" (Gray 199%,
106105).The air force's biocybemetics pro@ sought to employ
EEG monitoring both to track pilots' mind states and to control
aircraft functions. Although the program was cmeled in the late
1970~ research
~ in EEG monitoring and control systems continues
at the Naval Health Research Center, which studies "links be-
hYeen human cognition and psychophysiology principally EEG
and eye movements, to develop neural human-system interface
(NHSI) technology" (Naval Health Research Center 1996). Addi-
tional EEG interface systems have been developed by the Depart-
ment of Psychology and Cognitive Psychophysiology at the Uni-
versity of Illinois (Farwell and Donchin 1988) and have been
demonstrated in cursor control systems (Wolpaw et al. 1991)
unication devices for handicapped users
er, and Kdcher f 993).
EEG-based systems, however, have two fundamental limitations
m impractical for the proposed direct mind-to-
cation. First, they are monodiredional; they "have
no possibility of input to the brain" (Wright 1993, 3). Although
changes in EEG can be interpreted to control various computer
functions, the computer cannot in turn influence brain waves in
unicate with the user. EEG interfacing, therefore,
holds more promise for the control of prosthetics than it does for
nicative interadon. Second, the range of control provided
by the EEG form of BC1 remains extremely limited. "Although
leading researcher Jonathan Wolpaw has co d that 5x1the-
ory the brain's intentions should be discernible in the spontaneous
EEG,' the sheer complexity of the brain's measurable activity pro-
duces EEG traces which present a formidable problem of interpre-
LINGUA EX MACHXMA 1317
M a t happens in the Babel ephdc;, in the tribe of the Shem? Notice that
the word "shemm"already means name: Shem equals name, The Shem de-
cide to raise a tower-not just in order to reach all, the way to the heavens
but also, it says in the text, to make a name for ves*. . . How will
they do it?By imposing their tongue on the e n t i ~universe on the basis of
this sublime edification.Tongue: ac.hnalXy the Hebrew word hero is the word
&at siwfies lip. Not tongue but lip. Thw, they want ta impow their lip on
Ihe entire universe. Wad their enterprise succeeded, the mivmsaf tongue
would h v e been a particular lmmage irnp0scl.d by violence, by force, by vi-
olent hegemony over the rest of the world, (1W103)
language movement, for example, has been criticized for its asso-
ciation with cultural imperialism and ethnocentrism. Early univer-
sal language projects, like the Ars Magna of Ram6n Lull, were ini-
tially devised for the purposes of converting the heathen to
Christianity. Not only was this missionary activity complicit with
the colonial expansion of Europe but the choice of "universal"
concepts and linguistic material demonstrate a distinct European
predisposition. This "unconscious ethnocentrism," as Eco (1995,
69) calls it, continues to inform the language and linguistic projects
associated with the computer and computer-mediated co
cation. First, the technologies of MT, brain-computer interface, and
t (at least initially) developed for purposes
nication. All three technologies were ini-
rated under the U.S. Department of De-
fense for purposes of national security. MT not only began as an
extension of wartime cryptanalysis by computer (Hutchins 1986,
24) but was motivated by the "fear of Soviet technological prowess
(particularly after the launch of the sputnik in 1957) [which]
stimulated much gov tary support for Russian-
English translation" (Hutchins 1986, 15). The various techniques
and technologies of brain-computer interfacing were initially de-
vised and developed by the U.S. Air Force for controlling combat
aircraft, and a significant portion of contemporary EEG BC1 re-
search is funded and coordinated by the U.S. Navy's Cognitive
Psychophysiology Laboratory. VR technology was pioneered in
simulator systems such as the Link Trainer, which was employed
during World War II to train combat pilots, the U.S. Army's SIM-
NET ta&-battle simulation, and the U.S. Air Force's experiments
with head-mounted display systems and haptic input/output de-
vices. As Howard meingold (1991) confesses, "if necessity is the
mother of invention, it must be added that the Defense Depart-
ment is the father of techology; from the Army's first elecmnic
digital computer in the 1940's to the Air Force's research on head-
mounted displays in the 1 9 8 0 ' ~ ~ U.S.
the tary has always been
the prime contractor for the most significant innovations in com-
puter technology" (79-80). Consequently, the enabling technolo-
gies of computer-mediated co u ~ c a ~ are
o n correla~vewith a
particular vision of national defense and cultural hegemony This
is not to say that the techologies in question could not eventually
be disentangled from the network of their own genealogy. Such
disentanglement, however, is not automatic. It requires, in the first
place, that one take this complicated paternity and its conse-
quences seriously. As Fenny (1994) advises, technologies are never
neutral but are always products of a specific culture (248).
Second, the general projea of MT and the efforts of postlinguis-
unication (BC1 and postsymbolic c unication) have
been formulated and organized according to a particular under-
standing of language and linguistic variation. Specifically,linguis-
tic Uference is considered to be an empirical problem that can be
overcome and mediated through techniques that appeal to and
employ fundamental and universal elements (i.e., an original pro-
tolanguage, universal gra cognitive capability, or
the "things themselves"). This approach, which proceeds under
the assumption of "unity within diversity" or "identity in differ-
ence," belongs to and is justified by a specific philosophical and
cultural tradition. It is not, therefore, properly speaking, universal.
It is merely a particular concept of linguistic diversity that has
been imposed on the world and, by virtue of this fact, has been
considered to be universal. Consequently, the post-Babelian con-
cord that has been encoded in computer technology from the be-
ng constitutes nothing more than the imposition of a particu-
lar and restricted understanding of language and linguistic
diversity that is derived from and complicit with Western meta-
physics. Finally, employing the "Tower of Babel" as a legitimating
narrative for projects of universa u f i c a ~ o nis itself com-
plicit with this ethnocentric trop the "Tower of Babel"
narrates an original, universal it is a story that be-
longs to a particular culture a d. in one of the lan-
guages resulting from the Babelian confusion that it describes.
s 11:1-9 as the paradigm of
ersality from the position and in the
language of one of the particulars. In this way, universal concourse
LINGUA EX MACHXMA 1417
Itas always been correlatd with a number of other appositional pairs. Lat-
eral assaciatiom link the mindfbdy opposition to a whole series of other
appositional (or bharized) terms, enabEng &ern to funcZ;ion interchange-
ably, at least hcertain contexts. The ~ n d / b d y
relation is hquently cosre-
Xated with the distinctions beween reason and passionf s e w and ~nsibil-
ity, outside and hside, self and other, depth and surface, reality and
CORPUS ABXTTERE 155
Withh the kadieions of the Westf *ese dualities are never situa-
tions of peaceful coexistence but constitute what Derrida (1981a)
calls "violent hierarchies" (41). Such "dichotomous thinking,"
Grosz (1994) argues, "necessarily hierarchizes and ranks the two
polarized terms so that one becomes the privileged term and the
other its suppressed, subordinate, negative counterpart" (3).
Within Western traditions, mind has been customarily situated
above and has ruled over the body, which has consequently been
understood as the negation of everything that is deter
* This deter~nazlilon,
in ,has been acco
by mobilizing the elements of the other binary pairs that constitute
the structural field of Western systems of knowing. Mind, for ex-
ample, is associated with divinity, while the body is relegated to
the r e a h of brutrE? Mhd is dete
tal form; the body shable material.
visible, while the body remains divisible. Mind is profound and
essential, the body superfluous and merely accidental. "Through
these associations," Grosz (1994) concludes, "the body is coded in
terms that are themselves traditionally d d" (4). Because of
this precedence and privilege granted over its negative
and devalued counterpart, Nietzsche (1983a) characterized West-
em thought as composed of "despisers of the body" (146).Cyber-
space and its promised emancipation from the body, therefore, is
nothing other than a technological incorporation of this ancient
and deprecatory practice.
Discourses that promise liberation from the body through tech-
nology mobilize and leverage this rich tradition. In this fashion,
mind becomes posited as the essence of the person and is con-
sidered to be the source of one's true identity. The body and its
complex of variations, on the contrary, is conshzted as a mere ac-
cident of biology, something that is inessential to who and what
the individual actually is. Tracing the implications of this as-
156 CORPUS AMITTERE
Virtual Discrimination
The language of Ihe Internet, and not just its struc-t-ure,is specific to the
Westem World,
Conclusion
We have no reason to delude ourselvr?s that any new technology; as such,
groanises any sort of miocultural liberation.
only promotes a mode of liberation that does not in any way prob-
lematize or question current positions of cultural privilege but ob-
scues the fact that the very means of liberation is itself identical to
the mechanisms of oppression. For the privileged few, this form of
emancipation bolsters current modes of sovereignty while main-
taining the facade of equity and democratization. On the other
hand, for those already excluded through their association with
materiality and the body, these empty promises of emancipation
reinscribe current systems of domination. This procedure is not
only contradictory but effectively legi es tradi~onal.forms of
oppression and prejudice under the sign of
tunately, this operation has all too often b
those who have lived with and under oppression. Namely, what is
promoted as "liberation" amounts to little more than another form
of subjugation.
Confronting the effects of this technologically enabled corpus
amittere, however, like so many critical and appositional undertak-
ings, will be neither simple nor self-evident. The majority of ap-
proaches that endeavor to address and critique these issues
assume that the best way to oppose the transcendentalist pre-
tensions of cyberspace is to reaffirm the body and the "reality of
lived bodily existence." This is precisely the strategy espoused and
employed by Allucquere Stone (1993), Michael Heim (1993), Zi-
auddin Sardar and Jer~me Rave& (1996), Ziffah Eiwnsteh (19982,
and many others. Heim (19931, for example, concludes his exami-
nation of the ontology of cyberspace with this nostalgic plea: "As
we suit up for the exciting future in cyberspace, we must not lose
touch with Gibson's Zionites, the body people who remain rooted
in the energies of the earth. They will nudge us out of our heady
reverie in this new layer of reality. They will remind us of the h-
ing genesis of cyberspace, of the heartbeat behind the laboratory"
(107).And Stone (1393) hafizes her exa ation of the problem of
embodiment in cyberspace with the following conclusion: "No
matter how virtual the subject may become, there is always a body
attached. It may be off somewhere else . . . but consciousness re-
mains firmly rooted in the physical" (111).In these and similar
CORPUS ABXTTERE 1171
1. For a brief analysis of the utopian rhetoric employed by MCI, see Gurak
(199T).
2- For a detailed examinagon of the Heavm" Gate Cult and its complex rela-
tionship to the techalogy of the Internett sr?e Rofoinwnk ((1B7analysis.
)
of the complexitis of emandpa~on,see G m k d 1998a.
3. For an e x a ~ n a t i o n
4. "The conception of space wEch mderlies Euclidean gmmet~yis also only
one concepgon-it relies particularly on the 'atomistic>nd objm-oriented i d a s
of points, lines, planes, and wlids. Other conceptiom exist, such as that of the
Navajos where space is neither subdivided nor obfecgfied, and where evevthing
is in motion" "ishop 1995,72).
5. Although Pmny (1994) is critical of contemporary practices in computer-
graphics prdudion and v i ~ u arealiy l desie! he is by no means a pessimist. He
cites recent work by A p e s Hegedus and LW Hershman Leemns as examples
that experiment with and demomtrate afternative emplayments of compute?.
graphics techology (239-240).
6. This assumption is invatigated and complicated in Chapter 4.
7. For a detailed analysis of the dominance of the Engfhh fanwage on the In-
ternet and its relalianship to digitizd forms of Americanization, see Gunkel
19Wa.
8,Tramilatkn: "Because the liinpa fsanca of the Internet is Englishf a m;ijorily
of the world" people are made foreipers in the global village." f am grateful to
Reifiold Wagdeitna of Sahburg UniversivFwho f mt brought this text to my at-
tention.
9. For a critical examination of the hdamental exclusivily of Cartesim meta-
physics, see Chang, LZeco~stmct.z"ng Gomnzunimtion (1W6).
ECCE CYBORG:
THE SUBJECT O F
COMMUNICATION
under the condition set by the problematic" (44). The cyborg, how-
ever, threatens and promises to undermine this restricted formula-
tion of human subjectivity and its c nicative activity.
The problematic of communication has always occupied a
privileged position in the evolution of the concept of the cyborg.
Early cyborg research, for example, sought methods and proto-
cols for interconnecting technological apparatus and organic sys-
tems. The cyborg, as defined by Clynes and Kline (1995), de-
pended upon technologies that incorporate "sensing and
controlling mechanisms" capable of responding to and acting on
the physiology of the organism (31). Facilitating and developing
systems for this kind of machine-organism interface was defini-
tive of cyborg research from the late 1950s through the early
1970s. The Pilot" Associate m of the US. Air Force, far ex-
ample, sought to design "c ation linksf?hat would fas-
ter an "intimate integration of the human with the machine"
(Gray 1995b, 105). Similar efforts have been espoused by J.C.R.
Licklider (1960), who advocated the development of "very close
couplings" (1) between humans and electronic systems in his
seminal "Man-Computer Symbiosis"; Patricia Cowing, who de-
veloped NASA's Autogenic Feedback System for physiological
monitoring (Eglash 1995,94); and Peter Fromherz, whose silicon-
neuron circuit facilitates co unication between organic cells
and electronic systems (Hogan 1995,2). These practical efforts in
unications engineering, however, are made possible on the
basis of a more fundamental and essential intercomec~on.The
organism and machine co unicate, in the first place, through a
common, general conce f communication. "We have de-
cided," wrote Norbert Wener (1961), "to calf the entire field of
control and communication theory, whether in the machine or
the animal, by the same name cybernefics" (11). Under the rubric
ernetics, communication is posited as an isomorphism
n to both organic entities and technological systems.12 Be-
cause the cyborg, in whatever form it takes, names this intercon-
nection of the organic and mechanical, it exists in terms of com-
munication. As Haraway (1991b) concludes, "the cyborg is text,
ECCE CYBORG 1817
cyborg intends or causes this alteration. For the cyborg does not
threaten a pure and previously well-established concept of human
communication as some external catastrophe that could be re-
sisted or avoided with any amount of strength. It names a mon-
strous deformation of the subject of c ~ c a c ~ that
o n has iron-
ically always and already been underway within the discipline.
The cyborg, therefore, does not necessarily introduce or advocate
any new or revolutionary ideas. Instead it constitutes and names a
nodal point that collects and coordinates a number of seemingly
unrelated interventions that have questioned and criticized the
ation. First, by shifting the emphasis from the
the social and material conditions by which
various subject positions become possible, the discipline of com-
munleatlon overcomes what Lamamann (1991) t e r m "the ideo-
logical pitfalls of individualism, subjectivity, and subjective
intentionality" (195).Acco amamam, "A subjectivist ap-
proach to interpersonal c on emphasizes subjective ex-
perience at the expense g the powerful influences of
material con&~ons be r e ~ v and
e ra~onalconk01 of
the subject" (190). Under the individualist reduction, which is
rooted in Western metaphysics, co unication. studies risk re-
ng themselves to the ideological assumptions and necessary
ations imposed by the r ~ sconcept
t of the rational, self-
ed subject. As La nn points out, "the danger of an
uncritical acceptance of the subjectivist stance is that it limits re-
search to a derivative of social process (the inhapsychic) while
reifying the ideological belief that individuals are free subjects
who are in control of their experience" (192). The cyborg provides
an alternative formulation of the subject of u ~ c a t i o nthat
icative subjects "as cul
manifestations, inseparably connected to social and historical
processes" (187) and accounts for the " tentional consequences
of social interaction'"l95),
Second, the technology of mediated c cation has gener-
ally been understood as supplements to or extensions of natural
forms of human concourse. Consequently, the subjectivist orienta-
192 E C C E CWBORG
tion and ideology have customarily been imported into the study
of me&a and co tion technology. As a result, the various
technologies of cation are customarily understood as ar-
tificial aids extending the human subject's "natural" faculties. One
ed, of course, of the slogans popularized in the work of
Marshall McLuhan (1995): "The wheel is the extension of the
foot," "the telephone is the extension of the ear," and "electronic
media constitute an extension of the human nervous system."
Consequently, technical devices have traditionally been regarded
as prostheses for enhancing a particular human faculty, and their
relative worth has been evaluated according to the pragmatic logic
of efficiency. Jean-Fran~oisLyotard provides a succinct formula-
tion of this approach in The Postmodern Condition (1984): "Technical
devices originated as prosthetic aids for the human organs.
.. . They follow a principle, and it is the principle of optimal per-
formance: maximizing output and minimizing input. Technology
is therefore a game pertaining not to the true,the just, or the beau-
tiful, etc., but to efficiency: a technical 'move' is 'good' when it
does better and/or expends less energy than another" (M).For the
cyborg, however, technology does not remain a mere prosthetic
aid for an already formed individual to deploy to his/her advan-
tage or disadvantage. Technology participates in describing and
constructing the very subject positions that come to be occupied
by the cyborg. As Foster (1995) argues, "what is at stake in techni-
cal innovations is not simply an increased 'efficiency' of inter-
change, enabling new avenues of investment, increased produc-
tivity at work and new domains of leisure and consumption, but a
broad and extensive change in the culture; in the way that identi-
ties are structured" (23-24). From a cyborg perspective, therefore,
the fundamental question infordng the consideration of c
nication tebology and media is not "what can technology do for
me?" but "how does technology enable and empower the very
identity of this,or any other, subject position?" Consequently "the
is not an it to be animated, worshipped, and d
The machine is us, our processes, an aspect of our embodimentJ'
(Haraway 1991b, 180).
ECCE CYBORG 193
Conclusion
1 affirm at the same time: that czxistence is comnzunicathn-that all, r e p r e n -
tation of life, of being, and generally of "anytbg," is to be recomidered
from this point of view.
Notes
I. Haraway" 'Cybosg Manifesto: kience, Technolom, and Scialist F e ~ n ; i s m
in the Late Twentieth Century" was first published under the title &Manifestofor
Cyborgs: Science, T e c h o l o g ~and Socialist Feminism in the 1980's" in Socialist
h i e w 80 (1985): 65-108' and was subseyently included in her (1991b) colledion
of essays A detail4 explanation of the text's genes& and deveiopment is pro-
vided in a foohote appended to the laEer*In the year of the essay's reprinthg,
Haraway difzcussed Ihe development and impact of her work in an hierview
with Comtance Penley and Andrew Ross. Su arizing the manifesto" ilinit.al
context, Rass provides the following gloss: "One of the most striEng ef-fectsof the
Cybosg Manifesto was to announce the bankmptey of an idea of nature as resk-
patriarchal capitalism that had govern& the EureAmerican radical
mterculhre from the early 70s to the mid-80s. In the twholo@caUy
myday life of late capitalism, you were pinting out &at nature wm
to the conta@omof t ~ h o l o a that, t w h o l o w was part of nature
conceived as everyday social relations, and that woment especially, had better
start using twhnolagies before t w h o l o w starts using themw(Penley and Ross
1991, h), Ahhougk Haraway does not dispute this characterkation, her reply in-
dicates that she understands the context and effed of the "Cyborg Manifesto" oth-
196 E C C E CWBORG
emiw. That is an interesting way to put it. "X not sure what to say about that.
ta do in the cyborg piece, in the regiom that you%reciting there,
d us in the belly of the momter' in a tmhnsstrategic diseoure
witEn a heavily nnilitaked t w h o l a u (Paley and Ross 1991,61).m e r e a s Ross
understands tiho manifesto to be a specific reply
titiechdom trend of a kind of gddeseworskp
stands the pieee to have a much larger scope, Fo
general intervention in a technsscientific episteme that has already intevolated
who and what we are. As she explains in the short essay appended to the inter-
view as a po&t"cn'pt,"the cybarg manifesto was wrieen to find political dir&i~n
in the 19Ws in the face of the d d fcechworgarmic, humnoid hybrids "@"m&
to have become wo2"ldwideB(Haraway 1991a, 21).
2. Since the publication of Haraway" essay, cyborg h s rnatrefiaiiizd in a
number of ~ e f i n g X yunrelatd Eelds, e.g., ke m (Stabile 1994; Howell 1995;
SaPrBoval1995; Balmma IWCi), Bm studies (P-ask 1995; Rushng and Frentz 1995;
Springer 1996; Larson 1997; Bukatman 1993, environmental studies (Bemet
19931, literary criticism (Brown 1996; Lindberg 1996; Clayton 1996; WiXliams
19982, composition (Winkelmann 19952, philosophy and religion (Taylor 1993;
Driscoll 1995; Brasher 1996; Davis 1998), interdisciplimry studia (Shanti 1993;
Porush 19914; Biro 19%), scienceficzion studies (Dum and Erlich 1982; Harper
1995; Davidson 1996; Siivanen 1996; Casimir 1999, anthopology (Downey Du-
mit, and William 1995; Dwney 1%5; Darnit 1W5; William 1995; Wess 1W5; Et+
eobar 19961, sociolog;y and cultural studies (Fraibe-sg1993; Featherstone and Bur-
rows 19"3), and computer-mediated c o m r n ~ c a t i o nand idormtian techalagy
(Taylor and Saarken 1994; Stone 1995; Tmkle 1995; Gamarae 1995; Mitchell1995;
Dery 1996; Reid 1W6; Hillis 1996; Its 1999, The fact that the figure of the qborg
has bwome m thorougHy disseminated in this fasKon a d has o&en been em-
ployed in these various contct-xtsin different if not contradictory ways is a s y m p
tarn of and conwquently anticipated by Harawayfs characterhation h the "Cy-
borg Manifesto." Becauw the cyborg comGtutes an irortic and hybrid Bgwe that
blurs bomdaries and occupies the space be.ttvwn logical, categorical, and i d e
logical diskctiom, it is only f i ~ n that
g the cyborg comtitute a site of digerenre,
stmggle, and controversy.
3, For a sumey of the development of the concept of the eyborg in the wake of
C l p e s and K1inefsi d u e n ~ aadicle,
l see Halacy (19s) and Rorvik (1971j.
4, Although tjhEf~bomdary breakdowns are particularly evident in posmod-
ern culture, it has been argued that the delinritatisn of the human has always
been a cantested issue. Far this reason, Walacy (19G)argues that "the cyborgfs
h&tory begins arowd 1,QQ0,000BC." (39).
5. Por a critical investigation of the Human Gmamne Project, see Waraway
(1991;").For a csliticd saminatian of the recent concern with DNA in the biologi-
cal sciences, see Doyle (1997).
6, MaWlart (1996) provides a brief accomt of the histov of this approach:
7. Although there is an affiniv beween the cybsrg and the other intervention-
ist figures of postcolo~alism,fernini~m~ and p o s ~ d mt it would be err*
neous simply to conclude that they are identical, Haraway is careful to distinguish
the homogeneous tendency of identification wKch rduces differences to an es-
~ n t kunity
l and, as a result, alwap engenders violent exclusions and aggropri-
a-tjom, and critical a a ~ t i e swhich
, p e r d t csllaboration and coalition acmss irre-
ducible, heterogeneow digerences. Por Haraway (1991b), the primary task for
sppmitional consciowness is "affinity not iden~ty."(155).
8. For an analysis of Ihe f i s r e of the qborg in science Gction literature and
film, see Dunn and Erlich (1982), Shapirs (19931, Pask (19951, Harper (19951,
WiWer (1995), Rushkg and Frentz (1"35), Boyd (1%6), Daviictson (19961, Warri-
son (19951, Springer (19961, BuXcatman (1997), and tasmn (19917). In examhing
the cyborg, the xrious investigation of ~ i e n c efiction should not be mderesti-
m a i d , Elmitway (1992b) not only recognizes that this genera constihtes one of
the privilegd sites in which cybsrgs make their appearances (151), but she sug-
gests that science-ficlionwriters are the "theorist[s] for c y b o ~ ~073).
~ ; ~ It
" isr there-
fore, in science-fidion literature and film that the bowdargr breakdowns beween
the human, the anirnali, and the machhe are dramatized, t
plored. ft is for this reassn that the second sec'tion sf this essay
sis of an episctde from the 1991 season of Sfar Trek: Tlze Next Gmeration.
9. For a critical history of huarra&m, the concept of the human, and the devd-
opment of antihumanism and posthumanism, see Davies (1997). For a philo-
sophical critique of humanism, see Hastshorne (1969) and Perry and Renaut
(1990).
10, Mazlish (1993), udike Haraway (1991b), does not advocate the employ-
ment of a neologism like qborg. Mazlish engagcls in a kind of paleo~ynzy&at re-
tains the name "human" while ope&g the concept to a general expawion and
slippage in meaning. ""Zhall be arguing," Mazlish writes, "that h u m n nature is
not h&,not a kind of Platonic ideal, but is rather an evolving identity" (7)-Al-
though retaining the word human, Mazlish traces a concepbal erosion that dif-
fers from the cyborg only in name. "My hope is that readers of this book will
henceforth be persistently conscious of the machine question and will thor-
oughly and comtantly perceive the meaning in their own lives sf the intercon-
nected natwe of humans and machbes, More pointedly my aim is that readers
will then feel deeply that they are that particular evolutionary meature whose
origim are to be f o n d in both Ihe animal and the machine khgdom, with the
198 E C C E CWBORG
13. The re1ati.ve position of the concept of noise in qbemetics has been the sub-
ject of si@Eiicant internal debate and dwelopment. M e n Norbert Wiener ini-
tially introduced the science in his seminal text of 1948, he identified Claude
Shamon, who formalizd the Mi: timE Theoy ofConzmunicat.ion, as one of the
founding irtlluences in ithe development of cybctme-tics (Wimer 5961,10), The ae-
h o w l e d p e n t of Shamon" influence is reaffimed and elaboratd in Wiener's
(1988) subxquent publication. In this squef, which attempts to make the ideas
of cyberneti.cs "acceptable to a lay public" "5), Wiener mdits both Claude Shan-
non and M7;lrren Weaver with having assisted in making the n w e n t xience of
qbemetics a legitimate field of study. " [1"348] the subjst has grown
from a few ideas s h a r d by Drs. Clau Warren Weavw, and myself,
into an established region of research" S, 15-16). In Shannon" work
mication & w r y wf-rich was eventually publish& in 1949 along with a
lenshy inkduction by Weaver, noise was formulated as a negative concept that
is diametrically o p p o d to and a dismption of sipal. Because of the h e a g e ar-
ticulated by the "father of cy.kremetics," ear@ f o r m of cybernetic r e ~ a r c hap-
proach& the issue of noise in ways that were cornistent with Shmon" formu-
latiom. Subxquent developments incybernetics, howwer, begm to cornider the
concept othewise. As early as the Sventh Conference on Cybernetics, an alter-
na.tive approach was espoused by Dmald MacKay, Macfclay" work suggested
that noisc; was not the mere opposite of signal but constihtd the essmce of in-
formagon. These two diN:erent approaches to the concept of noise eventually re-
sulted in tvvo didlerent directiom for cy.k>metics-homeostasis and reflexivily;
For an account of the kstorical developments and sipificant intern1 debates of
cybemetia, see Elayler; (113%).
54. All too often the distinction bet-rveen these two operatiom is simply con-
#at&, rendering deconsmc~ona mphisticated f o m of desmclive analysis, As
a result, theorists like Lannamann (1991) inappropriately assume that d s o n -
stmction must necessarily be foEowd by a kind of "recomtruction" "(19, wEch,
as demonstrated by Rushing and Frent;?" ((1995)propmal to rmomtruct a "larger
aspect of the h u m n self" (251, always runs the risk of reestablisEng the very ob-
ject that would have b e n submiBed to criticism in the first place, Deconsmction,
however, does not indicate "to take apart." It does not, as Carey (19W) and 0th-
ers erroneously presume' signie "to break up," "to un-construct," or "to disas-
semble" "(22). On the contrary, deconstruction comprises an irreducible double
gesture, or what Bieseeker (1997) calls "a tvvo-stq that, contrary to intellectual
gossip, affirm rather than deplores radical posslibiliv" 0 6 ) -As charaderized by
Derrida (19821, this double gesture, or what is also called a douZlIe seimee, com-
prises both ilnversdon and displacement. "Deconstruction camot limit itself or
proceed immediately to a neutralization: it must, by means of a double gesture, a
double wience, a double writing, practice an overturning of the classical opposi-
tion and a general disptacemenl".of the system. It is only on this condition that de-
cornmction will prove itself the means with which. to infmme in the field of op-
po&tjions that it cn'6&zesm"29). The qborg exempli6es this CtoubZe geshnre in its
decomtmction of the tradit.liona1relationskp b&een the intending human sub-
ject and the activity of commmication. First' the cyborg invees the traditjional
200 E C C E CWBORG
stmcture that privileges the intending speaking subje& by plachg its emphasis
on the common material condition that first makes subjectivil-y possible. It does
not, however, simply remain at this phase of inversion7which wodd csmtitute
n o t h g less than a mere exchnge of positiom in the established system. There-
fore, at the same time that the cyborg deploys this initial inversion?it also d i e
places this simple revoIution by inbducing a new concept of subj~tivi.ty,what
one could call following fudith. Butler "~)'2rformative subjectivit~"that ""cmno
longer be, and never could be included in the previous regime" @(T>e& da19&Ia3
42). For a detailed treatment of the stsatem and implications of deconsmc~on,
see the Appendix.
15. This illustration, wKch investigates only one moment ina single episde of
Star Trek: The Next Cmeration, does not comtihte a thorough case study of the
Borg. Such an examhation would require a perspicacious reading that would
trace the development of this character from its initial htroducLion in Star Trek:
m Next Gmeratioa though the television sequel I l ~ a g e rthe
, Star Trek novels, the
motion picture Star Trek: Fimt Confact, and the CD-ROM-based interactive movie
Star Trek Borg. For a detailed investiga6on sf the Borg and their complex devel-
opment as a character within the Sb-ar Trek universe, see Coulding (1995), Elarri-
son et al. (196), and Xfernardi (1998). For a detailed analysis sf the "Best of Both
Worlds" e p i s d c we Wiwer (1995).
Appendix:
Deconstruction f o r Dummies
lodpg, writing, we must also mark the interval beWmn inversion, which b ~ n glow
s
what was high, m d the imptive emergace of a new "concqt," a concept that can no
longer be, and never could be, induded in the pmvistls =@me.(Derrlda 1982a, 4143)
Adam, Douglas. 1979. The Witehhihr" Guide to the Galaxy, New York: Pocket
Bmks.
Amerika, Mark, 1997. "Hypertextual Consciousness." "nternet.) Available at
atron.com/ htcl .O/htention.htd.
Andermn, Bendict. 1983. Inza@ned Cmmunities. MW York: Verso.
Anderson, Robert H., Tora K, Bikson, Salty Ann Law, Bridger M. Mitchell,
Christapher Ke?dziet Brent Keltner, Constantijn Partis, JwX PXiskin, and Pad-
manabhan Srimgesh. 19525, "Universal Access to E-MaiX: Feasibiliv and %-
cietaf. Implications" "R-650-MF). (Xntemet.) Available at http:/l/
www.rand.org/publicatiom/MR/MR650/.
hzaldua, GXoria. 1987,.BorderlandsD Frontea: m Neut Mest-im. San Francho:
Spimter/Aunt Lute.
Appadurai, Asjlm. 1996, M~dcmz'lF3(at. hrge: Cultural Din-renshns c?f Globalizafion,
Mimeapolg: University af Mhnesota Press.
Asale, Katie, and Rob ShieEds, 59526. "Is There a M y in the Net?"?In Cultures of
Infernet: Virtual Spaces, Real Hishries, L i ~ n gBodies, edited by Rob Shields.
London: Sage Ptxblications,
Aristotle. 1907. De Anima, tramlated by R, Hicks. Cambnidge, Mass.: Harvard
U ~ v e r s i qPress*
. 1941. De lnferpretatione. In The Basic Mrorh of^A&st-otle,edited and karts-
l a t d by Richard McKeon. New York: b n d o m House.
. 1982. Potties, translated by W"Hatniltan Fyfe, Cambridge?Mass,: Harvard
Universiw Press*
1992. Rhefor-i@, translated by J. H. Frwse, Cambridge?Mass,: Haxrvard Uni-
rre~ityPress.
Asnoid, Doug, toma Balkm, R, t e e Humphreys, SSiety Meyer, and LoaGa Sadler.
1994. Machine Transktio~:lnfroductoy Gur;de. Cambridgcl, Eng.: Blackwell.
A h available at h.ttp:/ /c~www.es~x.ac.~/-doug/boak/lb~ok.ht:ml.
Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, eds. 1995. The Post.-Colonhl
Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
Aabtakalnis, Steve, and David Blaher*1992, Silicon Mir~ge:The A1-t and Scknee tlf
Vktual Rmlity. Berkeley: Peachpit Press*
Amtk, John L, 1957, How t.o E)o n k g s zui;fh Words, C m b ~ d g eMass.:
, Harvard
University Press.
Bailey Cameron. 1996, "Virtual Skin: Articulating Race in Cy.bersgace." In
fmmersed -in "Saehnolsgy: Art- and Virtual Environments, translated b y Mary
A m e Maser and Dcluglas Mactmd. Cambriidge, Mass*:M E Press.
208 REFEREMCES
Bhabha, H o K.~1994. ""Of Midcry and Man: The Anntsivalence of Colonlal D&-
cowse." October % (spring): 125.--133..
Biesczcker, Barbara,.1997. Addressing Postmodernity: Kennefh Burr&, metoric and a
The~lbyof Social Chnge. Tuscaloosa: Udversifryof Alabama Presa
Biocca, F m d , Taeyong Kixn, and Mark R,Levy 1995, "The Vision of Virtual Re-
ality." In Conzmunz'eatiortin ike Age of Virtual Realily, e d i t 4 by Frank Biwca
and Mark R. Levy. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbfbaum Associates.
Biscca, Frank, and Mark R. Levy. 1995a. Preface to Comnzunimtion in the Age of
Virtual Reality, edited b y Frank Biocca and Mark R, Levy, Hillsdale, N.].:
Lawrence Erlbaum Aswciates.
. 1995b. "Virtual Reality As a ication System." In Commurticaiioa
i~ the Ag.e of Virtual RealiQ, d i t Biocca and Mark R. Levy. Hills-
dale, N.J,: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Biro, Matthew. 1994, "The New s Cyborg: Figures of Technology in
Wehar Visual Cultwe." New Crz"t%ue62: 71-110,
B&hop, Alan J. 1995, "Western Mrs s: The Secret Weapon of Cdtural Em-
perialism-" h Z nk Postcolonial Sttrdi;es Reader, d i t e d by Bill Ashmofi, Gareth
G&fi.tb, and Helen Tidfin. New York: RautlEtdge.
Bolter, Jay David. 1991. Wlvitirtg Space: T k Computer, Hypwtat, and t k History of
W ~ f i n gHiZllsdale,
. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assmialces.
Bono, Jarnes J.1995. T k Word of God and if&? b n g u a p o f m n : kt-erprefingNature
in Early M o d m Science and Medicine, vol. 1, Fici~ofo Desmrfes. Madiwn: Uni-
versiv of Wisconsin Press,
Booth, A. Donald, L. B r a n d w d , and J. Cleave. 1958. Mechanical Resolufl"anof
Linpist-ie Problem. London: Buttemo&b,
Boyd, Katrina G. 1 9 6 , "Cyborgs in Utopia: The Problem of Radical Difference in
Star Trek: 27he Mexi Gmmatio~. " h Inn i ~ Zones:
g Crz'ticalPositions on Star
Trek edited by Taylor Harrison, S a s h Projansky Kent A. h o , and Elyce
Rae Wellford. kulder: Wahriew Press.
Boyer, M. Chistine. 1996. CyberCifies: Visual Percqtio'sn in the Age of Electronic
Commurtication.New York P ~ c e t o nArchitectural Press.
Braidotti, Rosi, 1994. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Diflerence in
Contenzporaly Feminkt %oq. New York: Columbia University Press.
Branwltm, Gareth. 19%. "The Desire to Be Wired." Wired 1, no. 4: 92-94, Also
available at http:/ /wwwwireddcom/wired/arch.ive/l .O$/desire.to,be.
wired,htd.
. 199.4. "Csmpu-Sex: EroGca for Cybemauts." h Inkme Wars: The Discourse
of Cyberculture, &it& by Mark Dery. h r h a m , N.C.: Duke U ~ v e r s i vPress.
Brasher, Brenda E., 1996. "mou&ts on the Status of the Cyborg: On Twhologi-
cal Socialization and Its Link to the ReEgious Function of Popular Cultme."
JournszE of t h American Academy of Religio:on 885)-830.
Bromberg, Weather. 1996. "Are Muds Communities"lIdentity, Belonging and
Consciousness in Vidual Worlds," En Czclfuresofl'snfer~et: Vidual S p a m , Real
Histories, L i ~ l l gBodies, d i t e d by Rob Shields, T h o w n d Oak, Calif.: S a g
Publlicatiom,
Brwk, James, and Eain A. Boal, eds. 1995. ksist-ing the Ertual Lfe. San Francho:
City Lights,
210 REFEREMCES
Clynes, Manfred E., and Nathan S. Kline. 1995. ""Cyborgs and Space." In The
Cyborg Ha-ndbook, e d i t 4 by Chris Hab1es Gray. New York: Routledge, 1995.
C o l u d w f aristopher. 1989. %e D h r h of Christopher Colurnbus"sirst Voyage to
Arne7-i~~ (1492-1493)' banslated by OEver and James E. Kelly, Jr. Nor-
mm: Universiy of Oklahoma Press.
. 1993. "LeMers ta @wn Isabella," In Diseovelz'ng and Transfoming, dited
by David Krarx*. New York: Hascourt Brace.
Conrad, Josqh. 19B. Heart of Darkness. New York: Norton.
Cooliey, Charles Hoston. 1962 [l9011, Social Qrganizal.ion, New York: Schocken
bks.
Coward, R,, md J, Elfis. 1977. LGErtguage and Mte~lalisrn:Gzevelqments .in Senziology
and t k They of the Subject. London: Routldge.
Critical Art Ememble (CAE). 1994. % E k d r m k BisCurbanw. NW York: Autone
me&a.
. 1992. "Utopian PromiwwMet Realities." (Internet,)Available at h.tlp:/ /
wwf?.1l,com/wr/klr/texts/atopiancriIIhtd.
Dath~rrre~ 0. R. 19994. Imaginig the World: Mythical Belief vwsus R ~ l i t yiz"n GlaZlal
Encounters. Wesport, Corn,: k r g i n & Gamey.
Davidssn, Cmthia. 1996. "Riviera" Galem, Haraway" Cybsrg: Reading Neuro-
mncer As Baudriilfard's Simulation of Crisis." "ienee-Fiction Studies 23:
18&198.
Davim, Tmy, 1997. Humrtisism. NW York Routldge.
Davis, Erik, 1998. Techgnos&:Myth, m g i c , and Mysticism in the Age of informafion.
New York Harmony.
Delavenay E d e , 1960,An 1~iztmducf.ion to Mchirze Translia~on,New York: Freder-
iclc A. Praeger.
Deha, J e s C, ~ 1977. "Constmctivism and the Shdy of H m a n C
rterly Journal of Speech 63: 6 8 3 .
,G)orothy E. 1996, ""Concemhg Hackers Who Break into Computer Sys-
em." In Higk Noon on the Elgtronic Frontier: Concqtual It;sues i~'nCyberspace,
e d i t 4 by Peter Ludlow. Cambridge, Mass.: MlT Press,
Demida, Jacgrxes. 1973. "nff&ranceem h Speech and Pkmo on, edit& and tram-
l a t d by David B. Allison. Ewmton, 111,: Northwestem Ufiversifry Press.
. 1974, Cif Granzmt.alogy, translated by Cayatsi Chakravorty Spivak. Bailti-
more: Johm Hopkim Univasity Press.
. 1976, "The Retrait of Metaphor," Enclitic 2$no, 2: 5-33.
. 1978. Wlz'tiagand D~perenw,translated by Alan Bass. CKcago: UniversiQ
of Chicago Press.
. 1979. ""Lving On: Border Lines," "anslat& by fames Halbert. In Decon-
stmefim and Glz'tkism, e d i t 4 by Harald Blmm, Mew York: Seabury
. Ifirgla,Pos-il;iolzs,translated by Alan Bass, Chicago: Univmiv of Chicago
Press*
. 198lb. Disseminations, translated by Barbara f o h m n . Chicago: Univer-
sity of Chicago Press.
. 1982. firgins of Pkilosophy, translated by Man Bass. Chicago: Universiv
of Chicago Press.
212 REFEREMCES
Kevles, Daniel J., and Lersy H o d . 1999. The Code of Codes: Scient@c and Social
Issues .En the H u m n Genonze Pr~jecf.Cambhdge, Mass,: Harvard Ukversiq
Press.
bamarae, Cheris. 1995, ""A Backstage Crigque of Vidual Reality" h Cybersoeieb:
Compufer-Medkted Communication and Commmnit;y, edited b y Steve fones.
nousand Oaks, CaliE.: Sage Publicatiom.
Kroker, Arthur, and Michael A, Weinstein, 1994, Data Trash: The Theory of the
KrCtlal Cbczss. New York: St. Madin" Press.
Gueger, Myron. 1977. "Respomive Environments.""Proceedings of the Nalhnal
Cornpater Conference, pp. 42M33.
. 1991. ArtgeiiaE Reality If. Reading, Mass.: Addiison-Wesley
Kmzru, Hari. 1997. " b u Are Borg." Wired 5, no. 2: 156159. Also available at
hntQ:/ /www.wired.com/wired /5.02/ featwes/ffiarawayhtml.
tandowt George f", 1992,HypMext: The ConvergenceoJConl"elrzpardqCm'ltiml Zllzeory
and Technolo~.Baltimore: 'Job H o p k h UdvertiifryPress,
tanier, Jaron, 2988, "A Po&ait of the Yomg Wsionary" "nternet,) Available at
htp:/ /~ww.we~l.com/~~r/jar~n/vrint.htm~.
. 2993. ""Jron Lanier-Virtual Genius," Magical Blend Magazine 48. (Inter-
net.) Available at http: / /mgical.edenrZc~m/18ackiss~e/~itckjissue~.h~.
t d e r , Jaron, and Frank Biwca, 1992. "An Insider's View of the Futwe of Vimal
Realityl." "fouvlzal of Gmmunication 42, no. 4: 15G172.
mam, John W 1991. ""lnterperwnal CO d c a t i o n R e ~ a r c hAs Idedog-
ieal Practice." Communication %ory 1, no. 3: 179-203.
tarson, Glorm. 1997. " M a c h e As Messiah: Cybargs, Morphs, and the American
M y Pol;iLic," Cinema journal, 36, no, 4: 57-75,
Laurel, Brenda. 1991. Cornputus As Theatre. Reading, Mass.: Addimn-WesXey.
tear;y,Timothy. 1W4. Chaos and Cybu Culture. Berkeley: Ram.
. 1W9. "T%e Cy.Xlerpunk:The Indkidual As Realiiv Pilot." In CyberReah,
edit& by Victor Vitama. Boston: Allyn and Bacon,
Leder, Drew. 1990. m AZlsent Body. Clnicago: University of Chicago Press.
teed, Erie J, 1991, The M i ~ dof the Traveler:From Gilgamesh fo Global "r"ourz"sm.Boul-
der: Basic &b.
twwn, Lyrm H e r s b a n . 1996. Clicking In: Hof Link to a Digital Culture. Sattle:
Bay Press.
Lened, Edward M, 1998 ""A C mication meory Persp-ive on Telmammu-
nications Policy;" "umal of Communieat..ion48, no, 4.: 3-23,
Lernout and Hauspie 8. "PowerTranslator Pro." "ternet.)
Available at h&:
Levy, Steven. 1984. Ha lnputer Z1Zevolut.ion. New York: Anchor
PESS*
ticklider, J. C. R. 1960. "ManXomputer iosis," (Internet,) Available at
http: / /memex.org/f icHider.htd. Ori publish4 i n IRE Trwnsaet&ns
on Hmma Factors in Eleefrmi'es HRE-1 (Mar, 19t;0),
Lieuider, J. C. R., and Robed W TayXor. 1968. "The Computer As a Commmica-
tion Device." &ailable at ihttp://rnemex.org / l;ickliderfhtd.Oriwally pub-
lish& in S&enm and Technolagy (Apr. 1968).
220 REFEREMCES
Martin, James. 29m. The Wired Socieg. Englewood Cliffs, NJ,: Pren~ce-Hall,
Marvh, Caralp. 1988. W h Old Technologies Wme Mew: Thi~kingAbout EEectlr'c
Communicat-rianifi the Nineteenth Centuy. New York: Odord Univmiv
Press.
Mattelart, Armand. 1994. Mapping World Communicati~n:War, Progress, Culture,
translated by Susan Emanuel and fames A. Cohcln. MimeapoXis: tJ~vertii.P
of Mimesola Press.
. 1996. n e Invention of ComnzunicathnI translated by Susm EmanueX. Min-
neapolis: Wniiversiv of Mimemta Press.
2000. Networking the Virsdd: 279&200f), translatd by Lk Carey-Libbrecht
and JamesA. Cohen. Mheapolis: University of Mimesota Press.
Mattelart, Armand, and Michele Mattela-E-t. 1992. Rethinki~g Media Theory:
Signposts alzd New Directions, translated by James A. Cohen and Marian
U r q ~ d iMimeapolis:
. ZJniversiLy of Mimesota Press.
MazXish, Bmee. 1993. The Fourth LZiscontinui;Ey: The CO-Evolutim of Humans and
h/lachz.lzes.New Haven: Yale ie~versi.lryPress.
McFarland, D. J,, G. W. Neat, R. F. Read, and f. R. Wolpaw. 19.93. "An EEG-Baxd
Methd for Graded Cursor Control." Psychobblop 21, no. 1: 77-81.
McGee, Michael Calvin, 1982, "A, Mate~alist"sConception of &etorit," In Invlo-
rations in R k t o ~ c Studies
: i~ Holzor of ISougZas Ehninger, edited b y Ray E,
MeKerrow. Glenview, Ill.: fj-cott, Faresmn,
McLuhan, Marshall*1962. The Gulenberg Galaq: The Making of Typographic Mn,
Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
. 1995. Unclerstandz'ngMedia: T k Extensioas of M n . CambridgefMass.: MiT
Press*
REFERENCES 221
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 196. Beyond Good and Ev-iEi translated by Walter Kauham.
New York Vintage b b *
. 1969. Genmlogy of Morabs and Ecce Homa, tramlated by Walter Kauham.
New York Vintage Bwb*
19'74, The Gay Scimce, translated b y Walter Gufmam. New York: Vintage
Bmks.
. 1983a. Thus Spoh Zarathustra, translated by Walter Kaufmam. In The
Portable Nietzsck, edited by Waiter Kaufmam. New York: Penguin ESsoh.
1983b. "Tiuiligkt offhe Idols, translated by Walter Kaufmam, In T'ke Portable
Niefzsche, edited by M;"alter Kaufmam. New York: PengGn Books.
Nille, jack M,, F. Roy Carlson, Paul Gray, and Gerhard J' . Hamemm. 1976. The
Elecomnzunications Transportation Trade08 GFpZionsfir Tomorrow. New York:
j a h Wley and Sons.
Morris? CChstopher. 1982, Deeonstruethn: Theory and Practice. New York:
Methuen.
Movak, Thornas E, an L, Hogman. 1W8. ""H~dgingthe mgital Divide:
uter Access and Internet Use." onternet.) Avail-
erfoi1t.d~/ papers/race/ science,html,
Oguibe, Olu- 1996. "Forsaken Geographies: Cyberspace and the New World
Qther.""(f nternet.) Available at http: / /www*telefanica.es/fat/eogsf.ibe.
htd.
Okuda, Michael, Denise Okuda, and Debbie Mirek. 1994. m Star Trek Enqelwe-
dia. Mew York: Pocket Bmk.
Osgod, Charles E. 1969. "The Nature and Measurement of Mea~ng."In The
Semantic Dzferentkl Techniqueredit& by James G, Snider and Charles E, OS-
g o d . Chicago: Mdim.
Oslin, George E? 1W2, The Story of l'eleeommzcnieafians.Macon, Ga.: Mercer Uni-
versiv Press.
Pask, k i n . 1%. "Cyborg k o n o ~ aDesil-e : and tabor in .the TerninaimF i h . "
In Postmadern Apocalypse: Theory and Cultural Practice at tl-te End, edited by
Kchard hEamora. PKladelpKa: Udversie of
Patton, Phil. 1986, Open Rod: A Celebration o f fr"ce Ameuican Highway, New York Si-
mon and Schuster-
Penley Constance, and h d r e w Ross. 1991. "Cyborgs at Large: Intemiew with
Doma Haraway." h Technomlturrc,edited by Constance Penlq and h d r e w
Rass. Mheapolis: University.of Minnesota Press.
Penny Sirnon. 1992. "Vihal Realirty As the End of the Enlightenment Projmt."
(Internet.) Available at htt-p://www-art.cEa.cmnu.ed~/www-pemy/text/
VR-Dia-.htd.
. 1994. "Viduai. Reality As the Completion of the Enlightement Pmjml."
In Cultures on fhe B ~ n k Ideokogies
: of Technolom, edited by Cretchm k n d e r
and Timothy Druckey Seattie: Bay Press*
P e m Sirnon,
~ ed, 1W5. Cm'tical Issues in Electronic Media. Albmy: State Univmily
of New York.
PENSEE, 1998, (Internet.) hailable at http:/ /wwwoki.eo~jp/OKI/RDC/En-
glish/java /penm/irtdex.hM.
REFERENCES 223
Pfeil, Frederick. 1990. Another Rle to Tell: Politics and Narrative in Postmodem
Culture. London: Verso.
Pfurtscheller, Gert, Doris Flotzinger, and Joachim Kalcher. 1993. ""Brain-
Computer Interface: A New Co unication Device for Wmdicappd Per-
sons." Jocturnszl ofMicroeompzct.erA ~ l i c a t i ~ n16:
s 29S299.
Pbentel, Ken, and Kevin Tekeira, 1993. Virtual Rality: Through the Mew b o k ~ g
GEsxss, New York: Inkl/Windcrest / McGraw-Hill..
Plato. 1961. CraQCyZus, tramlated by Benjamin JoweM:,In T k Collected Dialogues of
Plato, edi_tedby Edith Hamilton and Hmtingon "Cairn. New York: Random
HOUR.
. 1982. Timms, hamlate8 by R. B. BUT. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Uni-
versiv Press.
. 1987. Republic, translated by Paul ShoreyeCambridge, Mws*:Harvard
University Press.
1990. Pkado, translilatd by Harold North Fowler. Cambfidge, Mass,: Har-
vard University Press.
PolXack, Andrew. 1993. ""Computers Are Stading to Take HumansYishes As
Their Commands." New York Tz'nzes, 9 Feb. Also available at http: / /www.
cs.man.ac.uk/aig/staff/toby /research/bci/nyt.htt.
Pool, Ithie1 de Sola. 19%. Technologies Withmt Boundarz"es: On Telecommuni~tions
i~ a Global Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Hamard. University Press.
Porter, David, ed. l%?.Internet Culture. New York: Routledge.
Pomh, David. 1994. "The Rise of Cyborg Culture; or, The Bomb Was a "Cyborg."
SU$~GCS 4 no. i i ? ~ 1-32.
:
Poster, Mark. 1990. The Mode c?( Information: Poststructuralism and Sochl Context.
Chicago: tiniversiv of Chicago Press.
. 1995. Second Medh Age, Cambridge, Mass.: Polily Press.
Powell, Jaxnes. 1B7. HTML Plus! klmsnt, Calif-:Wadswarth..
Provemo, Eugene F, 1999. Video Kids: Making Sense of Nirttendo. Cambridge,
Mass.: Hamard University. Press.
Reid, Elizabeth M. 1996. "Text-Bad Virtual ReaEties: 1den.tiV and the Cyborg
Bdy" In High Noon on the Electronic Frontier: Conceptual i!ssuesin Cyberspace,
d i t e d by Peter Ludlow. Cambridge, Mass.: MlT Press*
Reiller, Emin. 1%1. MT. Sattle: Urciversity of Washwon Press.
Rorvik, David M , 1971, As Man Becomes Machine: m Euolution oftbe Cyborg. New
York: Doubleday.
Rose, Mark H. 1979. IE twsia te: Express Rigbutay Polit ics 2 941-1 956. Lawrence: Re-
gents Press of &=as.
Rosenbaum, Ron. 19'71. "%rets of the Little Blue Box." "quire, Oct., pp. Iltj-124,
Ross, h d r e w . 1991a. Strange Mlmikr: Culture, Scimce; and Tecfinoll$yin the Age of
Limits. London: Verso,
1991b. ""Hacking Away at the Counterculture." In Inecknoculture, d i t e d by
Corntame Pedey and h d ~ Boss, w MheagoZis: UniversiLy of Mimesota
Press.
RGtzer, Flodan. 1W8. Digitale WelfmW@e:Strez3itge durch die Netzkulfu-~: Mmch:
Car1 Hanwr Verlag.
R u s b g , Jmice Hacker, and Thomas S Frentz. 1995. Projecting ike Shdow: The
can Film. Chicago: Unlivmiv of Chicago Press.
Ryan, Ma~eLaure.1994, "Immersion vs. Interactiviv: Virtual Reality and Liter-
ary meosy." Postmodem Culture 5, no, 1: 1-20. (Internet.)Available at MP:/ /
mw.jhu.edu/journafs/psshsx;tem-culture/v005/5.lrgran.htd.
%id, Edward VV; 1978, Qrinl.aEism, Mew York Random I-fouw,
Sandoval, Chela. 1995. ""New Mences: Cyborg Feminhm and the Methdology
of the Oppressed." In The Cyborg Handbook, d i t e d by Chris I-fables Gray.
New York: Routledge.
Sardar, Ziauddin. 1996. "Alt.civihation.fag: Cyberspace As Ihe Darker Side of
the West," In Cyberfitzlres: Culture and Politics on the I~fomationSuperhigh-
way, edit& by Ziauddin Sardar m d JeromeR. Ravetz. New York: New York
University Press.
Sardar, Ziauddin, and 'Jemme R. Ravetz. 1996. "1ntrduc;tion: Reaping the Twh-
nological Mirlwind." In Cyber;f-utures:Culture and Polii'tz'eson the I ~ f e r m t i ~ n
Superhighway, edit& by Ziauddin Sardar and ferome R. Ravetz. New York
New York U ~ v e r s i vPress,
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. A Course in General Linguistics, tramlated by
W. Baskin. New York: W a ~ e andr Row.
Schroeder, Ralph. 1996, Possible Mrsrlds: Tke Social Dynamic of Virtual Reality
Technology. kulder: Wesbiew Press*
%habest, Klaus*19532. "Esperanto As an Intermediate Language for Machine
Translation." In Computers in Translation: A Practiml Apraiml, edited by 'Joh
Newton, New York: Routledg.
Schumn, Bruce. 1988. "Utopian Computer Net-vvorEng: America" New Central
Projwt." (Internet.) Avaihble at h.ttp://www.rain.org/-orI@/ucs.html.
Shannon, Claude E., and Warrclrt Weaver. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of
Cmmunz'mt-ion. Urbana: U ~ v e r s i qof Illinois Press.
Shamon, Robed E. 19'75. S y s t m SimztEaf.ion:T k Arf alzd Scimce. Englewood Cliffs,
N.J,: Pren~ceHall.
S h a n ~Mys,
, 1993. "Cyborgs in the n-Dimension: The Heretical Descent of Non-
Euclidean Geomeq." Constructions 8: 57-82,
Shpiro, Michael A,, and Daniel G, McDonald. 1995. "I" Not a Real Dmtor but I
Play One in Virt.ual Realip: Implications of Virtml Realit-y for Judgments
REFERENCES 225
Sternbach, Rich, and Michael Okuda. 1991- Star Trek Next Gelaeration Technical
Manual. New York: Pwket B m k .
Stone, Allucquere . 1993. "Will the Real Body Please Stmd Up?: kmd-
ary Stories About Virtual Cultures," In Gyberspace: First S t q s , edited by
Michel Bendikt. Camb&dge, Mws.: MIT P ~ s s ~
. 1995. Zllze War of Desire and Technology af fhe Close c?f the Mechanz'cal Age.
Cambfidge, Mass.: ME' Press.
Stratton, Jeny 1994. "'The Joy of Aceas: M a t X s the Met?" Onternet.) Available at
http: / /~ww.acu~d.du/ac/heIp/?Jay.
Sutherland, Ivan. 1965, "The Ultimate Display" fioceedi~gsof the Inter~atiortal
Fedmatim of llafomation Processing Congress 2: BG508.
SwilFt;jonathan. 1965. GuEfiverk Travels. W o r d : Basil Blackwell,
Taylorf Mark, 1993. Nots. Chicago: Universiv of Chicago Press.
. 1997, Hiding. Clrricago: U ~ v e r s i wof Clt.ricagoPress,
Taylor, Mark, and Esa Saarinen. 1994. Imgologies: Medk Philosophy. New York:
Routledge.
Taylorf Paul A. 19%. Hachrs: C r i m in the Digital Sublime. New York: Routledge.
Technology for Amevica's Emlaomic Growth. 1993. Available at htp:/ /simrB2.si.
ehu.m/ DWS/nearnet.p.corn/mnag/ 10-93/articles/clhton/clinton.twh.
htd?informtion+superhighway*
Tei%ard Be Chardh, Pierre. 1959. Phornerzon ojMan, &awlat& b y Bernard Wall.
Telm 1-27.
T?P~ . 1997. 'Wsenet the Cultural k l i ~ c of
s Infor-
mation." In Intmet Culture, Porter. NW York Routldge.
Tkbaut, f o b W., and H a d d H. Ke1ly 1959, The Social Psycholoa oJGrozlps. New
York ' J o h Wiley and %m.
Thornas Aquinas. 1945. Summa Theologica. In Basic Writings of Sainf Tlzonzas
Aguinas, vol. I , edited and tramlated by h t a n C. Pegis. New York Random
House.
Todd, Loretta. 1996. "Aboriginal Narratives in Cy.bersgace." In Immersed in
Technolo~:Art and Virtual Enuironmrzts, e d i t 4 by Mary
Douglas ACTacLed*Cambridge, Mass.: MET Press.
Tdorov, Tmetan. 1984. m Co~questof America, translated by R c h r d Howard.
New York: H a ~ e S o X l h a
Tomas, David. 1993. ""aXd Rtuals for New Space: Rtes de Passage and William
Gibson" Cultural Model of Cyberspace." In Cpberspace:First Stqs, edit& by
Michael Benedikt. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Translation T e c h o l o a Alternatives, 1993, BYTE 18, no. 1: 1619-171.
Tr* 3'. M&--ha. 1939. frVomn, Native, Qtlzm: Writing; Postc~lonhkityand Femi-
nism. Blwmhgon: Indima University Press,
. 19511. Whm the Full Moon Waxes Red: Rvesentat-ion, Gender, and Cultural
hlitics. New b r k : Routledge.
Turkle, Shemy 1995. L$e on the Serem: XdenfiCy irz lLhe Age of the Inkmet, New York:
Sixnon and Schuster.
United States Advisory Council on the National Information Infrastructure
(XTSAC-NIX). 1996. A Nat.ion of Opporfunity: Realizing the Promise of the
REFERENCES 2217
Winograd, Terry; 19%. ""Computer SoEtvJare for Working wifi Languages." "im-
f$e Amm*can.251: 131-142.
WiBig, Rob. 1994, Invisible Reladezvous: Colaneetion alad Collaboratkn in the N m
Landscape of Electronic Wn'ting, Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University
Press*
WiWer, Julia. 1995, "The Best of Both Worlds: On Star TreKs Borg." In Prosthetic
Teretor-ies:Polities and Hyp&eehnologies, edited by Gabriel Br&m and Mark
Driscoil. Boulder: WesWiew Press.
Wolpawt Jomthan R,, D, f, McFarlmd, G. W. Meat, and C, A, Fomeris. 1991, "An
EEG-Basd Brain-Computer Interface for Cursor Control." "ectmencqhlog-
rapkg and Clinical Rjelkl~~hysiolo~ 78: 252-259.
Wwlley, Benjarn3n. 11392. Vi;rCual Worlds. New York: Penguin,
Wmsch, Wlliam. 1996. Disco~~ecfed: Haves and Have-nots in the Infmmt-iosz Age.
New Brmswiek, N.J.: Rutgers Ufivr?rsiv Press.
Wright, Andrew. 1993. "On Designing a Brain-Computer Interface: After All,
Computers Were Once Science Fiction, Too." (Enternet.) Available at
http: / /~ww.~s.man.a~.uk/aig/staff/ toby /research/bci/andrew-wright.
kt.
Wurzer, Jmrg. 19999,."Der Vermeintliche Sprung iiber KuXturelke Grgben." E l q ~ -
lis. (Internet*)Available at hktp:/ /www.kreise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/co/
2aO/l.html.
Yomg, Job 2.1978, Brogmrns of the Brairz. New York: Oxford Universifry Press.
. 1987. Pkilusopky and the Brain. Mew York: W o r d University PressI
Zaleski, Jeffrey E), 1997. The Soul of Cyberspaee: How New TechnaEogy Is Changing
Our Spirz'tual Lives, S m Francisco: HarperEdge.
Index