Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Education, Ideology, and Politics: History in Soviet Primary and Secondary Schools
Author(s): N. H. Gaworek
Source: The History Teacher, Vol. 11, No. 1 (Nov., 1977), pp. 55-74
Published by: Society for History Education
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/492726 .
Accessed: 23/06/2014 03:45
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Society for History Education is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
History Teacher.
http://www.jstor.org
55
II
The profound domestic changes of the late 1920's-Stalin's politi-
cal victory over his opponents, mass collectivization of the peasants,
IV
Theregimecontinuesto expectthe historyteacherto be a soldier
in the politicalstruggle.In that effort,the state maintainsits position
as sole repositoryof historicaltruth, whosemissionit is to facilitate
the progressiontowardcommunism.Instructionin historyis to sup-
port this cause with appropriateevidence and interpretations.Al-
though captivesof the regime,historiansandteachersof historyare
nonethelessviewedas potentially"dangerouspeople,"as Khrushchev
explainedto a delegationfromFrancein 1956,becausethey are "capa-
ble of upsetting everything."They must, therefore,be controlled.M
The conflictbetweenthe regime and dissentingintellectuals,among
whom are a goodlynumberof historians,vindicatesthis concern.
Several fundamentalquestionsandproblemsarise, therefore,in
Notes
1 The educationalsystems of other socialist states were shaped by the Soviet model.
See Nigel Grant, Society,Schools, and Progress in Eastern Europe (Oxford,1969). For
a survey of the administrative aspects of Soviet education, see Herbert C. Rudman,
School and State in the USSR (New York, 1967).For a general backgroundto Soviet
educational policy and practice,see Maurice J. Shore, Soviet Education:Its Psychology
and Philosophy (New York, 1947);Nicholas Hans, The Russian Tradition in Education
(London, 1963);LeonhardFroese, IdeengeschichtlicheTriebquellender russischen and
sowjetischenPddagogik (Heidelberg,1956);OskarAnweiler, Geschichteder Schule und
Pddagogik in Russland vom Ende des Zarenreiches bis zum Beginn der Stalin-Ara
(Berlin, 1967);and RaymondA. Bauer, The New Man in Soviet Psychology(Cambridge,
1952).
2 M. A. Zinoviev, Soviet Methodsof Teaching History,trans. from the 1948 Russian
edition by A. Musim-Pushkin(AnnArbor, 1952),3. For an elaborationof history's direct
and indirect functions see Nancy W. Heer, Politics and History in the Soviet Union
(Cambridge, 1971), chap. 1.
3 I. A. Petchernikova in Helen B. Redl (ed.), Soviet Educatorson Soviet Education
(London,1964), 101. The Soviet regime still maintainsthat a new man will emerge. For
a recent discussion see Jeremy Azrael, "Bringing up the Soviet Man: Dilemmas and
Progress,"in Problemsof Communism,XVII (1968),23-31. Regardingthe role of histo-
ry in this socializationprocess,MarinPundeffwrote:"thepoliticalleaders in controlare
convinced that the writing and teaching of history is a powerfultool for shaping minds,
conditioning people, and attaining political objectives. Knowledge of the nature and
content of this new history is not only desirable but imperative."Marin Pundeff (ed.),
History in the USSR: Selected Readings (San Francisco, 1967), v-vi.
4 Anatole G. Mazour, The Writingof History in the Soviet Union (Stanford,1971),
363.
5 James Bowen, Soviet Education:Anton Makarenkoand the Yearsof Experiment
(Madison, 1962), 137. For a survey of the early history of Soviet education see Sheila
Fitzpatrick, The Commissariat of Enlightenment: Soviet Organization of Education
and the Arts under Lunacharsky,October1917-1921 (Cambridge,1970).
6 Kommunisticheskaia partiia Sovetskogo Soiuza v rezoliutsiakh i resheniiakh
s'ezdov, konferentsii i plenumov TsK (4 vols.; 7th ed.; Moscow,1953-60), I, 419. For an
analysis of Lenin's views and policies, see Frederic Lilge, "Lenin and the Politics of
Education,"Slavic Review, XXVII(June 1968),230-57. Worthnoting is that Lenin was
often critical of experimentation. He continuously stressed the need for acquiring
thorough and practical knowledge in all subjects.
7 N. Bukharin and E. Preobrazhensky,The ABCof Communism(Baltimore,1969),
284.
8 For the Central Committee'sdecree of October 16, 1918, which established the
Unified Labor School, see Direktivy VKP (b) i postanovieniia sovetskogopravitel'stva o
narodnom obrazovaniia; sbornik dokumentov za 1917-1947 gody (2 vols.; Moscow,
1947), I, 120-27. Cited hereafter as Direktivy VKP.
9 Konstantin F. Shteppa, Russian Historians and the Soviet State (New Brunswick,
1962), 29. For discussions and analyses of changes in historiographyand the impact of
politics and ideology on history, see Mazour, Writingof History in the Soviet Union,
and his ModernRussian Historiography(2nd ed.; Princeton,1958);Cyril E. Black (ed.),
Rewriting Russian History (2ndrev. ed.; New York, 1962);John Keep (ed.), Contempo-
rary History in the Soviet Mirror (New York, 1964);and Nancy Heer, Politics and
History in Soviet Union. For a description of the "complex"or "synthetic"programs
see Albert P. Pinkevitch, The New Education in the Soviet Republic, trans. by N.
Perlmutter (New York, 1929),esp. 305-309. "Civictraining"during this period is dis-
cussed in Samuel N. Harper, Civic Training in Soviet Russia (Chicago,1929),chap XII;
and OskarAnweiler, Geschichteder Schule und Piidagogik,260-85. For examples of the