Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2200
20 35 ML1(ohm.m) LLS(ohm.m) 45 -15
120 300 180 280 -50 50 -50 50
2200
0.2 20 0.2 200
SP(mV) Depth DEN(g/cm3)
110 140 Lithology 1.85 2.85
(m) ML2(ohm.m) LLD(ohm.m)
other rock types include pebble and cobble conglomerate, GR(API) 0.2 20 0.2 200
AC(us/m) -50 50
2210
80 300 500 150
GR(API) dep GR IMF1 GR IMF2 GR IMF 3
Lithology -50 50
(m)
2260
and sand. The formation also developed a small amount 120 300 180 280 -50 50
50 -50
2220
2220
of fine sand and shale. The objective of this study is to
2230
differentiate different rock types using conventional well
2240
logs and then determine the deposition sequence.
2250
2240
2270
2260
2270
(vertical scale 1:100)
2260
2280
(vertical scale 1:500)
2280
2300
Figure 5. Decomposition models of GR log based on VMD
2280
2310
According to the features of decomposed modes of GR, we classified the zone into
Figure 4. Well logs with shale base line overlaid on the GR log 4 Parasequences, 13 formations.
2300
a) 0.6 b) 0.6
50 -50 50 -50 Stratigraphic unit 20 -20 20 -20
GR
(API) GR IMF1 dep LLD IMF1 LLD ENV2 LLD ENV3 LLD(ohm.m)
-50 50 -50 50 Lithology -20 20 -20 20
(m)
120 300
GR IMF2 GR IMF 3 120 300
Group Formation Long term Short term 0.5 50
LLD IMF2 LLD IMF3 0.5 50
2000
-50 50 -50 50 -20 20 -20 20
Frequency,%
Frequency,%
sand
Oil Gas Uplift Bulge Slope
0.2 0.2
I-0-1
2100
Structural belt Depression
0 0 Gravelly sand ES4I-0
I-0-2
2200
c) d)
I-1-1
0.6 0.6
Granule I-1-2
Conglomerate ES4I-1
0.4 0.4
2300
I-1-3
Frequency,%
Frequency,%
I-1-4
0.2 0.2
Pebble and Cobble
I-2-1
Conglomerate
2400
I-2-2
0 0
ES4I-2
40 60 80 100 120 140 1.85 2.05 2.25 2.45 2.65 2.85 I-2-3
Acoustic, us/ft Density, g/cm3
2500
Figure 4. The statistical analysis for (a) deep resistivity, (b) microlog, (c) acoustic, and (d) density logs I-2-4
I-3-1
2600
ES4I-3
I-3-2
2700
Fig 2. Major structure features of the study area
Figure 6. Decomposition models of GR log based on VMD
orthoconglomerate VMD decomposes an input signal into a number of modes that have specific sparsity
2800
properties. Each intrinsic mode function (IMF) has a localized frequency component,
which represents certain hidden information. VMD is achieved by solving the following Conclusions
Conglomerate optimization problem: • The VMD is a useful tool in decomposing the well logs into different modes. We can
2
jk t
j
min t t uk t e assign each mode with different role in the sequence and reservoir analysis.
uk , k t 2
k
• The large scale model reveals the stratigraphy sequence cycles, and the medium and
s. t . u t s t
k
small scale models are suitable for lithology classification
Paraconglomerate k
Gravelly Sand
Where 𝑢𝑘 and 𝜔𝑘 are modes and their center frequencies, respectively. 𝑆 𝑡 is the • The future study will combine the decomposed modes from different well logs to
Fig 3. The representative core samples
signal to be decomposed. 𝛿 𝑡 is the Dirac function. analysis the sequence and characterize the reservoirs.