Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Social activist Nikhil Dey is one of the founders of NGO Mazdoor Kishan Shakti Sangthan
(MKSS), which strives for justice for the poor. In this capacity, he has been involved in
struggles for the poor in the matter of payment of minimum wages and also for grass root
struggles for land. He is also known for his movements related to RTI (Right to information
act) and NREGA (National Rural Employee Guarantee Act). MKSS played a crucial role in the
legislation of RTI, which was used to know the reason behind the denial of their wages that
they were entitled to. Nikhil Dey worked for over 30 years with the NGO mostly in the rural
areas of Rajasthan. The most important aspect of the NGO is that it does not depend on any
financial assistance or funds from the government, corporates or from any foreign funding
agency. It is funded by the common people. This is because they believe that theirs is a
democratic political group and for democracy to function properly, people should be actively
involved in every aspect of it.
AADHAR:
The reason behind starting off this world’s largest biometric ID system was to have a single,
unique identification number that would have all the details (both demographic and
biometric) of every citizen of India. As of now, there are a plethora of ID cards in India like
passports, PAN, driving license and ration cards. Aadhar card will not be replacing all these
but it will be used as a sole identification proof when applying for any government schemes.
Even though Aadhar was launched to promote inclusion, it excluded many sections of people
after it was deemed mandatory in to avail many government services. 10 lakh old age
pensioners were struck of from the list and over 30 lakh families in Rajasthan were not able
to procure food rations. Aadhar only serves as a biometric authentication system and has
many limitations in terms of serving the true purpose of a universal identification system as
its data can be forged. People are not getting the services even if they have an Aadhar card,
either due to poor internet connectivity or due to corrupt practices followed in ration shops,
which ultimately are shown as savings by the central government. Also, Aadhar is not a
decentralized system and can lead us to question the government’s objectives whether, it just
a tool by the government to track our every movement. This raises few questions on Aadhar:
Why was a world standard data protection law and mechanism not set in place before
making Aadhaar mandatory?
If UIDAI’s data security measures have been analysed with respect to perceived threat
levels and potential privacy breaches, why has this information not been made public
to allay the fears of citizens regarding issues of privacy?
What redressal measures will be taken if data has been breached?