Shop www.moschinoonlinesale.com Moschino Outlet Store, Buy Moschino Logo Buckle Large Plaid Leather Belt Brown with Big Discount, Fast Delivery and Free Worldwide Shipping...
http://www.moschinoonlinesale.com/moschino-logo-buckle-large-plaid-leather-belt-brown.html
Shop www.moschinoonlinesale.com Moschino Outlet Store, Buy Moschino Logo Buckle Large Plaid Leather Belt Brown with Big Discount, Fast Delivery and Free Worldwide Shipping...
http://www.moschinoonlinesale.com/moschino-logo-buckle-large-plaid-leather-belt-brown.html
Shop www.moschinoonlinesale.com Moschino Outlet Store, Buy Moschino Logo Buckle Large Plaid Leather Belt Brown with Big Discount, Fast Delivery and Free Worldwide Shipping...
http://www.moschinoonlinesale.com/moschino-logo-buckle-large-plaid-leather-belt-brown.html
Lone vs. Estate of Shabazz, it was noted that Freedom of Religion; Non-Establishment the Moslem prisoners were being given a Clause (1988) different meal whenever pork would be served. No. 7: - Tawi-Tawi is a predominantly Moslem ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: province. The Governor, the Vice-Governor, The suit should be dismissed. The Free and members of its Sang-guniang Panlalawigan Exercise Clause of the Constitution is are all Moslems. Its budget provides the essentially a restraint on governmental Governor with a certain amount as his interference with the right of individuals to discretionary funds. Recently, however, the worship as they please. It is not a mandate to Sangguniang Panlalawigan passed a resolution the state to take positive, affirmative action to appropriating P100,000 as a special enable the individual to enjoy his freedom. It discretionary fund of the Governor to be spent would have been different had the Director of by him in leading a pilgrimage of his Prisons prohibited meatless diets in the penal provincemates to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, Islam's institution. holiest city. Philconsa, on constitutional grounds, has filed suit to nullify the resolution of the Sangguniang Freedom of Religion; Non-Establishment Panlalawigan giving the special discretionary Clause (1997) fund to the Governor for the stated purpose. No. 4: Upon request of a group of overseas How would you decide the case? Give your contract workers in Brunei, Rev. Father Juan de reasons. la Cruz, a Roman Catholic priest, was sent to SUGGESTED ANSWER: that country by the President of the Philippines The resolution is unconstitutional First, it to minister to their spiritual needs. The travel violates art. VI, sec. 29(2) of the Constitution expenses, per diems, clothing allowance and which prohibits the appropriation of public monthly stipend of P5,000 were ordered money or property, directly or indirectly, for the charged against the President's discretionary use, benefit or support of any system of fund. Upon post audit of the vouchers therefor, religion, and, second, it contravenes art. VI, the Commission on Audit refused approval sec, 25(6) which limits the appropriation of thereof claiming that the expenditures were in discretionary funds only for public purposes. violation of the Constitution. The use of discretionary funds for purely Was the Commission on Audit correct in religious purpose is thus unconstitutional, and disallowing the vouchers in question? the fact that the disbursement is made by SUGGESTED ANSWER: resolution of a local legislative body and not by Yes, the Commission on Audit was correct in Congress does not make it any less offensive to disallowing the expenditures. Section 29(2), the Constitution. Above all, the resolution Article VI of the Constitution prohibits the constitutes a clear violation of the Nonestablishment expenditure of public funds for the use, benefit, Clause (art. III, sec. 5) of the or support of any priest. The only exception is Constitution. when the priest is assigned to the armed forces, or to any penal institution or government orphanage or leprosarium. The sending of a Freedom of Religion; Convicted Prisoners priest to minister to the spiritual needs of (1989) overseas contract workers does not fall within No. 5: "X" is serving his prison sentence in the scope of any of the exceptions. Muntinlupa. He belongs to a religious sect that prohibits the eating of meat. He asked the Director of Prisons that he be served with Freedom of Religion; Flag Salute (1997) meatless diet. The Director refused and "X" No. 12: Section 28. Title VI, Chapter 9, of the sued the Director for damages for violating his Administrative Code of 1987 requires all religious freedom. Decide. educational institutions to observe a simple and SUGGESTED ANSWER: dignified flag ceremony, including the playing or Yes, the Director of Prison is liable under Article singing of the Philippine National Anthem, 32 of the Civil Code for violating the religious pursuant to rules to be promulgated by the freedom of "X". According to the decision of the Secretary of Education. Culture and Sports, United States Supreme Court in the case of The refusal of a teacher, student or pupil to O'Lone vs. Estate of Shabazz, 107 S. Ct. 2400, attend or participate in the flag ceremony is a convicted prisoners retain their right to free ground for dismissal after due investigation. exercise of religion. At the same time, lawful The Secretary of Education Culture and Sports incarceration brings about necessary limitations issued a memorandum implementing said of many privileges and rights justified by the provision of law. As ordered, the flag ceremony considerations underlying the penal system. In would be held on Mondays at 7:30 a.m. during considering the appropriate balance between class days. A group of teachers, students and these two factors, reasonableness should be pupils requested the Secretary that they be the test. Accommodation to religious freedom exempted from attending the flag ceremony on can be made if it will not involve sacrificing the the ground that attendance thereto was against interests of security and it will have no impact their religious belief. The Secretary denied the on the allocation of the resources of the request. The teachers, students and pupils penitentiary. In this case, providing "X" with a concerned went to Court to have the meatless diet will not create a security problem memorandum circular declared null and void. or unduly increase the cost of food being Decide the case. SUGGESTED ANSWER: a clear and present danger of a substantive The teachers and the students should be evil. In the case of Iglesia ni Cristo vs. Court exempted from the flag ceremony. As held in of Appeals, 259 SCRA 529, 549: Ebralinag vs. Division Superintendent of "Prior restraint on speech, including the Schools of Cebu, 251 SCRA 569. to compel religious speech, cannot be justified by them to participate in the flag ceremony will hypothetical fears but only by the showing of violate their freedom of religion. Freedom of a substantive and imminent evil which has religion cannot be impaired except upon the taken the reality already on the ground." showing of a clear and present danger of a substantive evil which the State has a right to prevent. The refusal of the teachers and the Eminent Domain; Non-observance of the students to participate in the flag ceremony policy of "all or none" (2000) does not pose a clear and present danger. No VIII. Madlangbayan is the owner of a 500 square meter lot which was the birthplace of the founder of a religious sect who admittedly Freedom of Religion; Limitations (1998) played an important role in Philippine history No XV. - A religious organization has a weekly and culture. The National Historical television program. The program presents and Commission (NHC) passed a resolution propagates its religious, doctrines, and declaring it a national landmark and on its compares their practices with those of other recommendation the lot was subjected to religions. expropriation proceedings. This was opposed As the Movie and Television Review and by Madlangbayan on the following grounds: a) Classification Board (MTRCB) found as that the lot is not a vast tract; b) that those to be offensive several episodes of the program benefited by the expropriation would only be the which attacked other religions, the MTRCB members of the religious sect of its founder, required the organization to submit its tapes for and c) that the NHC has not initiated the review prior to airing. expropriation of birthplaces of other more The religious organization brought the case to deserving historical personalities. Resolve the court on the ground that the action of the opposition raised by Madlangbayan. (5%) MTRCB suppresses its freedom of speech and SUGGESTED ANSWER: interferes with its right to free exercise of The arguments of Madlangbayan are not religion. Decide. [5%] meritorious. According to Manosca v. Court of SUGGESTED ANSWER: Appeals, 252 SCRA 412 (1996), the power of The religious organization cannot invoke eminent domain is not confined to expropriation freedom of speech and freedom of religion as of vast tracts of the land. The expropriation of grounds for refusing to submit the tapes to the the lot to preserve it as the birthplace of the Movie and Television Review and Classification founder of the religious sect because of his role Board for review prior to airing. When the in Philippine history and culture is for a public religious organization started presenting its purpose, because public use is no longer program over television, it went into the realm restricted to the traditional concept. The fact of action. The right to act on one's religious that the expropriation will benefit the members belief is not absolute and is subject to police of the religious sect is merely incidental. The power for the protection of the general welfare. fact that other birthplaces have not been Hence the tapes may be required to be expropriated is likewise not a valid basis for reviewed prior to airing. opposing the expropriation. As held in J.M. In Iglesia ni Cristo vs. Court of Appeals, 259 Tuason and Company, Inc. v. Land Tenure SCRA 529, 544, the Supreme Court held: Administration, 31 SCRA 413 (1970), the "We thus reject petitioner's postulate that Its expropriating authority is not required to adhere religious program is per se beyond review by to the policy of "all or none". the respondent Board. Its public broadcast on TV of its religious program brings it out of the bosom of internal belief. Television is a Freedom of Religion; Flag Salute (2003) medium that reaches even the eyes and ears No III - Children who are members of a religious of children. The Court reiterates the rule that sect have been expelled from their respective the exercise of religions freedom can be public schools for refusing, on account of their regulated by the State when it will bring religious beliefs, to take part in the flag about the CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER ceremony which includes playing by a band or of some substantive evil which the State is singing the national anthem, saluting the duty bound to prevent, i.e., serious detriment Philippine flag and reciting the patriotic pledge. to the mere overriding Interest of public The students and their parents assail the health, public morals, or public welfare." expulsion on the ground that the school However, the Movie and Television Review and authorities have acted in violation of their right Classification Board cannot ban the tapes on to free public education, freedom of speech, the ground that they attacked other religions. In and religious freedom and worship. Decide the Iglesia ni Cristo vs. Court of Appeals,. 259 case. SCRA 529, 547, the Supreme Court held: SUGGESTED ANSWER: "Even a side glance at Section 3 of PD No. The students cannot be expelled from school. 1986 will reveal that it is not among the As held in Ebralinag v. The Division grounds to justify an order prohibiting the Superintendent of Schools of Cebu. 219 SCRA broadcast of petitioner's television program." 256 [1993], to compel students to take part in Moreover, the broadcasts do not give rise to the flag ceremony when it is against their religious beliefs will violate their religious the City Health Officer. The wife of Juan freedom. Their expulsion also violates the duty Casanova wrote a letter to the City Health of the State under Article XIV, Section 1 of the Officer to have her formerly philandering Constitution to protect and promote the right of husband confined in some isolated leprosarium. all citizens to quality education and make such Juan Casanova challenged the constitutionality education accessible to all. of the law as violating his liberty of abode. Will the suit prosper? [5%] SUGGESTED ANSWER: Section 6 No, the suit will not prosper. Section 6, Article III of the Constitution provides: Right to Travel; Order of Arrest (1991) "The liberty of abode and of changing No. 6: Mr. Esteban Krony, a Filipino citizen, is the same within the limits prescribed by arrested for the crime of smuggling. He posts law shall not be impaired except upon bail for his release. Subsequently, he jumps bail lawful order of the court." and is about to leave the country when the The liberty of abode is subject to the police Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) cancels power of the State. Requiring the segregation of his passport. He sues the DFA, claiming lepers is a valid exercise of police power. In violation of his freedom to travel, citing the new Lorenzo us. Director of Health. 50 Phil 595, provision in the Bill of Rights of the 1987 598, the Supreme Court held: Constitution, to wit: "Neither shall the right to "Judicial notice will be taken of the fact that travel be impaired except in the interest of leprosy is commonly believed to be an national security, public safety, or public health, infectious disease tending to cause one as may be provided by law. Decide the case. afflicted with it to be shunned and excluded SUGGESTED ANSWER: from society, and that compulsory The case should be dismissed. Any person segregation of lepers as a means of under an order of arrest is under restraint and preventing the spread of the disease is therefore he can not claim the right to travel. If supported by high scientific authority." he is admitted to bail his freedom of movement is confined within the country. Therefore, if he subsequently jumps bail, he cannot demand Section 8 passport which in effect will facilitate his escape from the country; he is in fact liable to be Right to Assembly; Public Teachers (2000) arrested anytime. Indeed, the right to travel No XII - Public school teachers staged for days under the Constitution presupposes that the mass actions at the Department of Education, individual is under no restraint such as that Culture and Sports to press for the immediate which would follow from the fact that one has a grant of their demand for additional pay. The pending criminal case and has been placed DECS Secretary issued to them a notice of the under arrest. illegality of their unauthorized action, ordered them to immediately return to work, and warned them of imposable sanctions. They ignored this Liberty of Abode; Temporary (1996) and continued with their mass action. The No 2: The military commander-in charge of the DECS Secretary issued orders for their operation against rebel groups directed the preventive suspension without pay and charged inhabitants of the island which would be the the teachers with gross misconduct and gross target of attack by government forces to neglect of duty for unauthorized abandonment evacuate the area and offered the residents of teaching posts and absences without leave. temporary military hamlet. a) Are employees in the public sector allowed Can the military commander force the residents to form unions? To strike? Why? (3%) to transfer their places of abode without a court b) The teachers claim that their right to order? Explain. peaceably assemble and petition the SUGGESTED ANSWER: government for redress of grievances has No, the military commander cannot compel the been curtailed. Are they correct? Why? residents to transfer their places of abode (2%) without a court order. Under Section 6, Article SUGGESTED ANSWER: III of the Constitution, a lawful order of the court a) Section 8, Article III of the Constitution allows is required before the liberty of abode and of employees in the public sector to form unions. changing the same can be impaired. However, they cannot go on strike. As ALTERNATIVE ANSWER; explained in Social Security System Employees Yes, the military commander can compel the Association v. Court of Appeals. 175 SCRA 686 residents to transfer their places of abode [1989], the terms and conditions of their without a court order. If there is no reasonable employment are fixed by law. Employees in time to get a court order and the change of the public sector cannot strike to secure abode is merely temporary, because of the concessions from their employer. exigency, this exercise of police power may be b. The teachers cannot claim that their right to justified. peaceably assemble and petition for the redress of grievances has been curtailed. According to Bangalisan v. Court of Appeals. Liberty of Abode; Limitations (1998) 276 SCRA 619 (1997), they can exercise this No VIII - Juan Casanova contracted Hansen's right without stoppage of classes. disease (leprosy) with open lesions. A law requires that lepers be isolated upon petition of