português 

Recursos
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC)
Software in Olympus NDT EPOCH Series Flaw
Detectors
Contemporary digital ultrasonic flaw detectors calculate commonly used parameters for reflector position in angle beam
testing, typically including sound path length, flaw depth, surface distance, and beam leg. These calculations are based on a
measured pulse transit time, calibrated material sound velocity and probe zero offset, and entered values for test piece
thickness, beam angle, and beam index point. By default, calculations assume a flat test piece. In the case of circumferential
inspection of tubular parts, the calculations must be adjusted for the effects of test piece curvature. This is done by means of a
mathematical correction based on entered outside and inside diameters of the test piece. The following topics will be
reviewed.

1. Mathematical Theory
2. Previous Approaches
3. Implementation of Curved Surface Correction in EPOCH series flaw detectors
4. Measurement examples
5. Use of contoured wedges

1. Mathematical theory
In the case of common flat plate tests and axially-oriented tests of pipes and similar products, leg length and reflector depth
and surface distance can be calculated through simple trigonometry through the formulas below. But when testing a curved
part in the circumferential direction, these formulas become inaccurate due to the curvature that effectively causes reflectors to
drop away from the probe, which lengthens the sound path and changes the reflection angle at the inside surface of the part.
For example, compare similar conditions for a 45° beam in flat and curved plates both 20 mm thick. The signal obtained at a
35mm sound path length in a flat plate corresponds to a reflector located at a depth of 15.2mm, 24.8mm from the exit point.
But the same 35 mm sound path in a 100mm diameter pipe corresponds to a reflector 19.2 mm deep from the OD surface and
31.7mm along the test surface from the exit point to the point over the reflector.

To correct for curvature, a number of mathematical relationships can be applied, based on the angles, measured sound path
and dimensions defined below. Utilizing these formulas with leg management enables proper calculation of surface projection
and vertical depth of flaws.


Legend for equations:
S = Surface Distance
Β = Angle of Refraction
Α = Sound path distance
t = Thickness
R1 = Inside Radius
R2 = Outside Radius
Βmax = Maximum angle of refraction
Ε = Angle of reflection at ID
Φ = Projection angle
D = Depth of reflector
1. Projection angle at ID (first leg)
Φ = sin-1(R2/R1 sinΒ)

2. Sound path distance Α, half skip

Α = R1∗sin(Φ_Β)/sin(Β)

3. Depth of reflector D
D = R2 – √Α2 + R22 - 2R2ΑcosΒ

4. Surface distance S
S = ΠR2/180[sin-1(R2/R1 sinΒ)-Β] Note: for first leg test, R1 = t-D

5. Maximum angle of refraction for a given wall thickness (angle of impingement)

Βmax = sin-1(R1/R2)

2. Previous approaches
Traditional analog flaw detectors measured sound path length only and could not automatically calculate reflector depth or
surface distance, or count skip legs. Live automatic displays of these additional dimensional parameters, based on
trigonometric calculations, were introduced with the development of digital instruments. However early model digital flaw
detectors calculated depth for flat test pieces only. Both with these instruments and analog flaw detectors, operators
performing circumferential testing on pipes and similar curved test pieces used graphs and nomograms such as the ones
below to calculate dimensions.


The graph at left is used to determine a correction factor k that is based on refracted angle and the ratio of wall thickness and
outside diameter. The nomogram at right is used to determine the actual reflected angle at the inside of the curved surface,
which because of the curvature is less than the refracted beam angle at the sound entry point.

Once k and the refracted angle Β have been determined, it is possible to calculate the actual leg length AB from the formula:

AB = tk cosΒ

Once the leg length is known, a reflector can be accurately placed within the first or second leg of the sound path based on the
measured sound path length. Further calculations of flaw depth and surface position must be done manually. As an alternative
to calculations, look-up tables have been published that relate these geometrical corrections to test piece diameter, wall

thickness, and inspection angles.

In the absence of software for curved surface correction, another alternative to manual calculations or look-up tables was to
empirically set up flaw detectors with the aid of a reference standard representing the tube wall in question and incorporating a
series of side drilled holes. Reflections from the multiple reference holes can be identified with respect to horizontal position
and a screen overlay can be used to mark their vertical depth and surface projected positions on the display. The resulting
screen display is horizontally non-linear, but reflector positions can be extrapolated from it by referencing the overlay.

3. Implementation of Curved Surface Correction in EPOCH

series aw detectors
The Curved Surface Correction (CSC) software in the EPOCH series flaw detectors performs calculations automatically based
on setup information input by the user.

These calculations assume that initial probe calibration for sound velocity and zero offset have been performed as usual on an
IIW-type block or similar flat reference block. Following that calibration, the operator enters the probe angle, the thickness of
the test piece, the “X value” (the distance between the beam index point and front edge of the wedge), and the part diameter.


The EPOCH software then uses that information plus the measured sound path length to calculate and display the following,
based on the equations in Section 1.

sound path length

Projected surface distance from front of probe (or beam index point if no X-value
is input) along outside of the test piece

depth of reflector
Assuming proper calibration and setup, these measurements will be as accurate as those on a flat test piece in a given setup.
The example screens below show a typical measurement of a first leg reflector in a thick wall reference sample, shown with
and without CSC correction. When the correction is applied, the flaw depth measurement is shallower (1.13” versus 1.31”) and
the surface distance or projection is farther from the probe (1.39” versus 1.07”).

CSC correction off

CSC correction on
Additional notes:

In all tests that involve circumferential probe alignment it is very important to hold the probe normal to the surface rather
than tilting it. Tilting will skew the sound beam and effectively change the refracted angle in the test piece.
In cases where the ratio of wall thickness to diameter is large, the sound beam at a given angle may not reflect off the
ID, instead continuing straight across to the OD without a skip. (See section 1, equation 6.) In these cases CSC
calculations are not valid and the EPOCH will not report dimensional information.

4. Example measurements using EPOCH 600
First leg measurements of pipe section with 0.1” side drilled holes as shown in photograph, using EPOCH 600 flaw detector
and A543S-RM transducer with ABWM-4T-45 wedge. Diameter is 5.0”, wall thickness 0.470”. Reflectors are 0.1” diameter side
drilled holes with centerline depths of 0.160” and 0.310” from OD (1/3 and 2/3 thickness).

The SDH diameter factor causes a small offset in the reading. When establishing the physical location of the reflector within
the part it is important to measure depth and surface projection to the normal of the outer radius tangent. The measured sound
path displayed is not affected by CSC correction status. Proper calibration of zero offset and material velocity are required. In
the examples below:

Physical measurement of sound path to hole OD

Surface projection is measured from the beam index point (X Value=0)

First leg measurements

FIRST LEG CSC Off CSC ON Physical Measurement

Sound Path 0.47 0.47 0.46

Depth 0.33 0.31 0.31

Surface distance 0.33 0.38 0.40


 CSC off

CSC on

Second leg measurements

SECOND LEG CSC Off CSC ON Physical Measurement

Sound Path 1.14 1.14 NA

Depth 0.14 0.27 0.22

Surface distance 0.8 1.04 1.03


 CSC off

CSC on

Third leg measurements of pipe section with 0.1” side drilled

holes.

THIRD LEG CSC Off CSC ON Physical Measurement

Sound Path 1.78 1.78 NA

Depth 0.32 0.16 0.160


 Surface distance 1.26 1.54 1.50

CSC off

CSC on

5. Use of contoured wedges

As the diameter of a cylindrical test piece become smaller, circumferentially oriented coupling of conventional wedges
becomes progressively more challenging, due to reduced contact area and the increased possibility of rocking. For that
reason, special cylindrically contoured wedges are sometimes used on smaller diameter test pieces. As a guideline, the
International Institute of Welding recommends contouring whenever test piece radius R is less than the length of the wedge W
squared divided by four:

The SDH diameter factor causes a small offset in the reading. When establishing the physical location of the reflector within
the part it is important to measure depth and surface projection to the normal of the outer radius tangent. The measured sound
path displayed is not affected by CSC correction status. Proper calibration of zero offset and material velocity are required. In
the examples below:

R W2 / 4

ASTM standard E-164, Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Contact Examination of Weldments, calls for use of radiused wedges
whenever the part diameter is less than 20 inches or 500 mm. Olympus NDT experience suggests that this is a conservative
recommendation, especially when using small angle beam assemblies, but it is up to the user to determine applicability to
specific test.


The minimum outside diameter for which a wedge of a given size can be cylindrically contoured depends on mechanical
considerations related to wedge size and angle. The following chart lists the approximate minimum contouring diameter for
three common Panametrics-NDT wedge types.

Minimum OD for cyl. contour 45 degree 60 degree 70 degree

ABWM-4T 0.8” or 20 mm 1.1” or 28 mm/td> 1.5” or 38 mm

ABWM-5T 1.5” or 38 mm 2.2” or 56 mm 2.8” or 70 mm

ABWM-6T 1.2” or 30 mm 1.7” or 43 mm 2.4” or 60 mm

Panametrics-NDT contoured wedges maintain a beam index point at the BIP location marked on the wedge, and the nominal
wedge angle is calculated based on beam refraction at that point. However it is important to note that cylindrical wedge
contouring affects the incident angle and thus the refracted angle from front to back across the diameter of the beam, resulting
in a range of refracted angles and effectively a defocusing and broadening of the beam in that axis.

When using contoured wedges, appropriately contoured reference blocks must also be used to calibrate zero offset and verify
beam index point and refracted angle. Conventional IIW and AWS-type reference blocks cannot be used because of the gap
between the block and the concave surface of the wedge.

Inscreva-se para receber os 

boletins informativos

Instrumentos de END 
Videoscópios e boroscópios 
Soluções em microscopia 
Analisadores por XRF e XRD 
Suporte 
Multimídia 