Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Next GEC Meeting: Gain Management Buy-in for APM Transformation
Posted by Dan Miklovic on Wed, Feb 17, 2016 @ 10:30 AM
Find me on:
http://blog.lnsresearch.com/the-next-gec-meeting-gain-management-buy-in-for-apm-transf... 2/17/2016
The Next GEC Meeting: Gain Management Buy-in for APM Transformation Page 2 of 9
APM is evolving. Originally thought of as a very specific discipline related to condition-based maintenance (CBM),
reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) and asset criticality assessment; APM has grown to encompass all
aspects of supporting the physical assets that an enterprise uses to delivers its goods and/or services. Each
organization must clearly define its and where APM fits with respect to the entire application landscape. Some
organizations include the functionality associated with an Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) package or the
EAM module of an enterprise resource planning (ERP) suite in their definition of APM while others do not. Since
the definition of APM can vary widely the first step in communicating with management is to set the parameters of
what functionality falls within the context of APM in your organization.
The second part of properly communicating with management is to clearly define what real benefits the adoption of
APM will generate for the enterprise. The purpose of a BPI project is improvement of processes with the resulting
cost reductions or profitability improvements from increased productivity. LNS Research’s APM survey has
consistently, over the last year, shown that the driving factor for adopting APM is improving operational performance.
Gaining management buy-in means the improvements must be both specific and quantifiable. It’s always easier
when you put the results that APM can deliver in terms related to either cost reduction or capacity or productivity
increases.
Select the Right KPI’s and Track and Publish Performance Measurement
Once you gain some management support, at least for a pilot project, you need to gain all-in support by
demonstrating you are in fact achieving the improvement you promised. To do that you must have meaningful
metrics. The challenge for many enterprises is defining the metrics that correctly measure the process they are
attempting to improve. If the goal of your APM initiative is to reduce failures, simply measuring downtime may not be
the correct metric. Seasonal or product specific conditions such as raw material quality may impact downtime as
much or more than mechanical failures. A better metric in this case might be unplanned reactive maintenance as a
percentage of overall maintenance activity. Everyone who can impact the metrics by understanding what is being
measured and why, as well as current performance, is another driver of using metrics to full potential. By publishing
the actual measurement and the rationale behind the metric, people will be less inclined to manipulate the results to
merely make the metric “look good.” As with any other BPI initiative it is critical to gain not only management buy-in,
but the support of those that are actually performing the work. You must demonstrate why improvement is good for
them, as well.
Of course once you are using appropriate metrics, tracking improvement is straight-forward. To demonstrate the
actual benefit your APM initiatives are delivering, you must have first documented the state beforehand. It is not
sufficient just to look at cost reductions or production improvement at the top line. Eternal factors may have a greater
impact than what the actual APM projects contribute. For example, say the goal of an APM initiative was to reduce
costs by improving energy consumption. One may look at energy spending today versus a year ago, and could claim
significant cost reductions. However, it would be more likely the cost savings came from the drastic drop in energy
http://blog.lnsresearch.com/the-next-gec-meeting-gain-management-buy-in-for-apm-transf... 2/17/2016
The Next GEC Meeting: Gain Management Buy-in for APM Transformation Page 3 of 9
prices rather than the APM project itself. If one measures energy usage, then improvement can be documented if
you have before-and-after data. To prove the worth of APM to management you need before-and-after data.
Join our next Global Executive Council as an exclusive member to join Dan Miklovic of LNS Research and Nikolaus
Despain of Leprino Foods to learn how to overcome APM challenges across the enterprise.
First Name *
Last Name
Email *
mekarim@deloitte.ca
Website
Comment *
Subscribe to follow-up comments for this post
Subscribe by Email
Email*
mekarim@deloitte.ca
http://blog.lnsresearch.com/the-next-gec-meeting-gain-management-buy-in-for-apm-transf... 2/17/2016