Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The main cause of enviornment degredation is the human activity in one way or the other. Law is
a regulator of human conduct.Many people are under the impression that India does not have
strong wildlife conservation laws. On the contrary, we have some of the most stringent
legislations to protect wildlife and habitats. In any enviornment consicous state, enviornmental
problems are generally handled at legislature level.In India, from time to time various laws for the
protection of enviornemt , flora and faunahave been enacted. But the Indian constitution is
perhaps the first constitution in the world which contains specific provisions for the protection
and improvment of the enviornment. It reflects the human rights approach to enviornment
protection through various constitutional mandates.In India, the concern for enviornmental
protection has not only been raised to the status of fundamental law of the land,but it is also
wedded with human rights approach. The example of indian constitutional provisions for
enviornmental protection has been followed by other nations in the world. For example, the
framers of the constitution of South Africa were greatly influenced by the provisions relating to
enviornment protection under the Indian constitution and they have also incorporated similar
provisions in their constitution. The provisions for the protection of wildlife in india can be
discussed under following heads:-
a) Article 48-A
It imposes obligation on the state to protect and improve the enviornment including wildlife.It
provides that The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard
the forests and wild life of the country
b) Article 51-A
Clause (g) of article 51-A imposes a fundamental duty on every citizen to protect, inter alia,
wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures. It provides that it shall be the duty of every
citizen of india to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and
wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures. A perusal of the said provision clearly
shows that both state as well as citizens are under an obligation to protect the wildlife and to have
compassion for living creature
c) Seventh Schedule
List III of the seventh schedule contains the following entries under which both the centre and the
state can make laws:-
Entry 17. Prevention of cruelty to animals
Entry 17-A. Forest
Entry 17-B. protection of wildlife and birds.
Entry 29. Prevention of the extension from one State to another of infectious or contagious
diseases or pests affecting men, animals or plants.
Further, list II of the seventh schedule also contains the following entries under which the state
can make laws to preserve, protect and improve the livestock and prevent animal diseases, and on
fisheries
Entry 15.Preservation, protection and improvement of stock and prevention of animal diseases;
veterinary training and practice.
entry 21 Fisheries.
a) Section 4 the act provides for the establishment of Animal Welfare Board for the promotion of
animal welfare generally and for the purpose of protecting animals from being subject to
unnecessary pain or suffering, in particular.
c) Section 15 the central Government is empowered constitute a Committee for the purpose of
controlling and supervising experiments on animals by notification in the Official Gazette. d))d)
Any person who contravenes the provisions of Section 38J [tease, molest, injure or feed any
animal or cause disturbance to the animals by noise or otherwise, or litter the grounds in a zoo]
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine
which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both. Provided that in case of second or
subsequent offence the term of imprisonment may extend to one year or the fine may extend to
five thousand rupees As per section 52, whoever attempts to contravene, or abets the
contravention of, any of the provisions of this Act or of any rule of order made hereunder shall be
deemed to have contravened that provision or rule or order, as the case may be.
If any person, exercising powers under this Act, vexatiously and unnecessarily seizes the property
of any other person on the pretence of seizing it for the reasons mentioned in sec. 50, he shall, on
conviction, be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with
fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.