‘Transference patterns in the psychotherapy
of personality disorders: empirical investigation
REBEKAH BRADLEY, AMY KEGLEY HEIM and DREW WESTEN.
Background Theconceptof
‘transference has broadenedtoa
recogrtion that patients ofen express
enduring relational pattern inthe
‘therapeutic relationship.
Aims Toerarine the structureof
patient relational paternsin
psychotherapy and their relation with
DSM-IV personality disorder symptoms
Method Arandomsample of
poychologists and psychiatrists (18!)
completed battery of instruments ona
randomly selected patient intheir care.
Results Exploratory factor analysis
identified five transerence dimensions
angry entitled, anxéousjpreoccupied
svoidant/courterdependent, secure)
engaged and sexualsed These were
assocatedin predictable ways with Axi I
pathology; four mappedonto aduit
attachment styles. An aggregated portrait
oftransference patterns in narcisstic
patients provideda clsialy rch,
empirically based description of
transference processes that strongly
resembled circa theories,
Conclusions The wayspatients
interact wit ther therapists can provide
important data about thee personality,
attachment patterns and interpersonal
functioning, These processes canbe
measured cliically sophisticated and
psychometrcally sound ways, Such
processes are relatively independent of
clinicians theoretical orientation
Declaration of interest None.
Funding detaiedin Acknowledgements,
Since Freud's inital secopnition chat
patents may enact interpersonal patterns
in the therapy relationship (Freud, 1912,
41917), the concept of transference has
evolved considerably (Sandler, 1976;
‘Wachtel, 1997). In contemporary tems,
wansference refers broadly to patterns of
thoupht, feeling, motivation and behaviour
that emerge in the therapeutic elationship
and reflec enduring aspect ofthe patient's
personality and interpersonal functioning
(Westen & Gabbard, 2002). Although &
small body of reseatch exists oa tanser-
ence processes (eg. Laborsky 8 Crit
Christoph, 1990; Cuts eal, 1994), mach
Of our understanding of transference is
derived from clini! observation, inthis
study we apie a clinician report measure
of tansfereace phenomena to a sample of
patents in psychotherapy, with two goals
fet, to identify ehestracte of patient’
relational patterns as observed in psycho-
therapy; and second, to test hypotheses
bout the ration between teansference
patterns and peesonaliy pathology. The
‘broader goal ofthis esearch was to develop
clinically sophisticated, paychometially
Sound measce of patient’ interaction
patterns ia psychotherapy including
thoughts, flings, affect regulation strate
es, motives, behaviours and conflicts) that
could be uefa in research and practice.
METHOD.
We used a practice neewock approach, in
‘which andomly selected clinicians peovide
ata on patients that can be aggrenated
across large samples (Westen & Sheer,
1999; Margzon etal 2000; Audin etal
2001; Shlder 8 Westen, 2004) Elsewhere
we have addessed in detail the cational
for clinician-eport dat, including advan.
tages and limitations (see Westen
‘Weinberger, 2004) The peimary advantage
is that clinicians are experienced observers,
with skills and a normative basis with
hich to make inferences and recognise
vances in psychopathology. The primacy
‘objection is the possibilty of bias incinicl
Judgement. Recent research suggests, how
fever, that clinicians tend to make highly
reliable and valid judgements if thei
observations are quantifed using psycho-
‘metic instruments. Cocelations between
treating clinicians! and independent inter-
viewer? assessments of a range of clinical
‘ratables on instruments designed for ose
by experienced clinicians tend to be large,
typically over 0.50 (Eikesroth et al,
2000, Westen & Muderisola, 2003),
and clinician-eported personality data pre
dict measuees of adaptive functioning,
atachmeat pateens, and family and
developmental history suggestive of validity
(NakaslHskovies ta, 2002; Westen ta,
2003). Clinician theoretical orientation pe
dicts ide variance in descriptions of clini-
‘al phenomena when clinicians are asked
to describe a specific patient rather than
‘thir beliefs oc theories (Sheer Be Westen,
2004).
Participants
Participants were 181 expeienced tii
cans randomly selected from the member
Ship registers ofthe American Pryhiaric
and American Psychological Asocatons.
‘We requested mailing ste ofdnicians with
at least 3 year post icensire or post:
residency experience, who indicated that
they performed a least 10 hours per week
of diac patient care. Approximately 10%
of solicited clinicians retened postcards
cating their imterest in participating in @
project requiring approximately 4h of their
time for an honorarium of USSBS. Validity
checks comparing psychologists with pay-
chit, who responded at substsnlly
liferent aes, uncoveed no significant dif
ference on any vatiable of interest (13
tests and analyses of variance, P<0.01),
suggesting thatthe relatively modest ce
sponse sate (reflecting substantial time
commitment fora token honorarium) was
unlikely to account for the findings (ee
Lintations
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
To obtain aeros-secton of prychotherapy
atiats sen in clinial practice, we asked
clinicians to desribe a non-paychotic pa-
tient at least 18 years old who they bad
‘ecated with pryshotherapy fora mitimum
of eght sessions (to maximise the likeli
hood tha they would know the patient well‘enough to provide a reaxoably accurate
1). We used
the scree plot, pexcentage of variance
accounted for and parallel analysis (Horn,
1965; O'Connor, 2000) to elect the
numberof factors to rotate, The ste plot
indicated a break between five and tx fe
tors, and pacallel analysis indicated that
five factors had eigenvalues larger than
‘would be expected by chance, Several fc-
tors emerged across algocthms and rots
tions, with the mote coherent solution
emerging from a fivefactor oblique (Pro
max) solution which accounted for 45%
‘ofthe variance {with factors each account
ing for 2.5% to 26.4% of the vatiance)
forther details ate available from the
authors upon request,
‘Table 1 describes the factor. To create
facrorbased (unit weighted) scores, we
inluded items losding 0.50 o¢ more for
factor 1 and 0.40 or moce for factors 2-5
fo maximise relibility, Intercorrelations
among. the fire factors ranged from
0112 t0 0.54, witha median of 0.14,
Factor!
Factor 1, angeyentled (coefficient
10.94), if marked by items indicating
tendeney to make excesive demands of
the therapist while simultaneously being
angry and dismissive, The items accord
with clinical descriptions of transference
process in patents with Axis It luster B
disorders, nobly narcisistic and
borderline pesonality disorders,
Fectar2
Factor 2, anxiouspreoceupied (coefficient
0.85) includes items describing fear of
the theeapists disapproval, fears of eee
tion bythe eherapis, a overly compliant
tnd dependent attitude toward the“Tablet Factor seu of th Pychotherpy Rosie Qustonnr
Factor 23 4s
Fecor Angled
staves in way tat tom ected, wanes pei vers, lower fs than is warranted by sje income) 08
‘Vacate beeween ding and dvaing the therapt oe
Feel rte of hetherape, on on
Repeatedly esr fils to respec the boundaries ofthe thera relitionship oe
Lbargumenentve on
Is provoitetends to st upsuton In whlch the therapis fkangry, atcha or provoked oe
Inoppottiona tend to igre withthe heap’ pproich, commits suggestion, 069 ow
Pye the therapist ff agaist another person gx arent, ote rather herp) as
Ismanpuste or
"Nets tobe spac tothe therapist wars tobe more import than th herapa'scher patents oer
Flesng ager at the therapist. os
Requires or demands excessive cont, oe ec, from the therapist. 066
Isundtic toward the thrapt eg enjoy ming the herp sur) oes
Fealangry tonardte therapist on
Neads exces aiiation from the therapist 00 os
Imagns s/he and he thera are much moe snr than thoy rely reams to watt be tw! os
withthe thera
Voices concrrs thatthe therapist ie ot ding enough toby os
Is dsmisivoor devaluing toward the therpit oss
lecompectve withthe therapist os on
Es sadam, sarcasm or oer ube ce ever sggresve respons rom the heaps, os
Isp: makes the thrapit fsa waking on gee ost
Expresses wih thatthe therapist ould har parent ost
‘oclates erween considerable involemesivetinet inthe therapy and thoughts of ulting 030
“resto get he harap otk hs or hr sen conf with other people 080
Fctor2:Aaiospreceuied
Fal esr, doing someting wrong in therapy on
Fealinferir tothe therapist 070
letra of contradicting or digreing with he therspa hs trouble asserting own ester vewpole 066
Fearsshoisulingheeherapet. oe
Has trouble aking about own sucess shenerent or pride with the thera ous
overly compan os
lesraid of being abandoned by the harpist. ost
lesralt speak hjher min for ear of provoking stack, t,t, from the terapit ost
‘Appears comfortableina childs elein therapy endeto draw paronclikeresporsestromthe therapist, «39 031
Feel dep ashamed about her ations, wishes, symptoms, ute, ee owe
Hasty cxpresing ange or dsppelrement ovard the thera, een when the therapist as ade on
2 make or not been el
Is uncomfortabe imagining tt the therapist cares about hha, dep obvious nds otharwie on, a9
Worle hace harap dose not inher on
lls for the therapist ob deci, wars the thera total hier what odo om oa 031
‘Worries tha the heaps eno ep ihe oat
Foctor 3 Securelegsged
cs warm ekings from tho therape on
Inempsthiwoward the herpes oe
lopli 260
lsatuned tothe vera and nner meanings fhe herp communicates adept readng os
bl soci eves
(nets