1.

The Filipino can remarry upon obtaining a decree of divorce abroad and should be valid here
as such. It is now well settled in jurisprudence that the decree of divorce obtained by
2. Yes, A can invoke his law and the judgment obtained abroad that he is not obliged to
support under their laws. A must, however, prove to the courts that he is in fact not obliged
by presenting necessary documents proving such law. Absent such proof, the laws abroad
are presumed to be the same in the Philippines giving right of support in favor of C.
3. Q
4. Q
5. Q
6. Q
7. Q
8. Q
9. Q
10. Q
11. Q
12. Q
13. Q
14. The donations are valid provided that the formalities under the law of donating such
properties are followed. The donation of 5m must be in writing and the acceptance of such
must also be in writing because the amount is in excess of the P5,000 threshold. The
donation of the House and lot must be in a public instrument since it is an immovable and
the acceptance of such must be in the same instrument or it can be executed in another
public instrument.
15. The contention is not correct because Torre de manila is not a nuisance. To be qualified as a
nuisance, the act or property must offend of annoy the senses or it may endanger the
public. The mere fact that Torre de Manila is an eye sore to the public, without any evidence
and adequate proof that the same would be an annoyance or would endanger the public,
the petition to stop the construction of Torre de Manila must necessarily fail.
16. Yes, A’s will can be admitted to probate. By admitting the will to probate, the dispositions
written in the will can be properly determined so that if there are any discrepancies or
deprivation of legitime, the same can be corrected to pursuant to law.
17. Yes, the will may be admitted to probate because if the formalities of making a will abroad
are followed, the will is valid here in the Philippines.
18. No, the contention is not correct. B can inherit from his father in his own right and is not
subject to the iron barrier rule since B inherited directly from is father not from his
grandfather even though the only property came from the latter.
19. It means that it is not material that the witness can see the act of the witness in writing their
names to the instrument, it is enough that that they are in a position to see it if they choose
to.
20. A. No, there is no double sale. In double sale, it contemplates a situation wherein the same
property is validly sold to different persons by the same seller. In the case at bar, there is no
valid sale between the foreigner and A, hence there is no double sale on the property when
the same is sold to C.
 B. C has the better right because a foreigner has no right to own property in the Philippines
hence the sale of the property as to him is void.

21. Toyota has the alternative remedies of 1.) exacting the full payment of the car 2. Cancel the
sale if the buyer failed to pay 2 or more installments 3) foreclose on the chattel mortgage if they
constituted a mortgage on the property.

22.

23. In the implicit renewal of a lease of contract, it means that absent any demand of the lessor
to the lessee to vacate the property within 15 days from the expiration of the lease contract, the
contract is impliedly renewed providing for the same terms and conditions of the original contract.

24. No, the levy and the sale is not proper. The partnership has a separate personality distinct to
that of the partners. The debts or obligations of the partnership is not the obligations of the partners in
their personal capacity absent any bad faith on contracting by the partners in incurring such obligations.

25.

26. no the obligation does not earn interest absent any stipulation in writing that the loan will
be subjected to interest in case there is late payment thereof.

27. yes, A is liable.

28. The act of the hotel guest of parking the vehicle in the proper parking area of the hotel
constitutes necessary deposit. The management of the hotel is liable for such damage to the vehicle or if
the vehicle is lost in the said parking space by the hotel.

29. No, the continuing mortgage over the car is invalid. The mortgage over the car constitutes
chattel mortgage and is provided for by law that the chattel mortgage is only valid to the obligation
existing when the chattel was constituted.

30. Yes the agreement is valid because the car is not automatically transferred to B for the non-
payment of the obligation since the latter must still pay for the purchase price of the car.

31.