Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Modeling the particle separation efficiency has been a topic of interest since the air cyclones was intro-
Received 3 April 2011 duced for gas-particle separation in the fields of environmental science and chemical engineering. In this
Received in revised form 2 October 2011 work, a new simple time-of-flight model is theoretically developed to predict the particle separation effi-
Accepted 4 October 2011
ciency in cyclones. In this model, the equivalent volume method is employed to geometrically modify the
Available online 17 October 2011
cylindrical-conical type cyclone as a right cylindrical cyclone in order to overcome the nonuniform effect
on the particle separation distance. Based on the analysis of the gas flow pattern and the particle dynam-
Keywords:
ics in the cyclone separator, the differential equation for the time-of-flight model is established according
Cyclone
Particle
to the principle of particle mass balance. The model can be finally expressed as a simple explicit function
Separation efficiency including the main cyclone dimensions and operating parameters, without the need for solving complex
Time-of-flight equation of mathematical physics. The influences of the short-circuit flow near the bottom of cyclone
Residence time outlet duct and the exchange flow between outer and inner vortex flow are comprehensively considered
to revise the effective residence time of gas flow, a key parameter in the present model. By comparisons
with experimental data as well as other classical separation models for the cyclones with different geo-
metrical configurations and operating conditions, the results show that the present model has a relatively
high predicted accuracy with the mean squared error of 0.0158. It is demonstrated that the present model
has considerable availability for predicting the particle separation efficiency for cyclone separators.
Ó 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction to cyclone design by Chan and Lippmann [6] and Moore and
McFarland [7]. The time-of-flight model assumes that the particles
Cyclone separators are widely used in the fields of air pollution enter the cyclone in a certain radial distance from the cyclone axis,
control and gas-particle separation for aerosol sampling and indus- and must travel outward from this position to the wall to be
trial applications. With the advantages of relative simplicity to fab- collected. The representative research on this theory was contrib-
ricate, low cost to operate and good adaptability to extremely uted by Leith and Licht [8] and Clift et al. [9]. A recent report on
harsh conditions, cyclone separators have become one of the most time-of-flight model was reported by Zhao [10], but his model
important particle removal devices which are preferably utilized in was based on the combination of the critical particle size and
both environmental and chemical engineering. boundary layer separation. In the 1980’s, a hybrid collection model
In order to describe the performance of cyclone separators, was proposed by Dietz [11]. This model considered both particle
many gas-particle separation theories were developed using interchange between the outer and inner vortices across cyclone
different methods with different simplifications and assumptions. and particle migration to the wall. Subsequently, the assumption
All these can be roughly divided into the pure theory, the semi- of this model was justified and extended by Mothes and Löffler
empirical theory and the numerical simulation. The former two in- [12]. Other different hybrid theories also included the particle dif-
clude the equilibrium-orbit model, time-of-flight model and hybrid fusion model by Li and Wang [13] and the boundary layer model
model, etc.; the later mainly refers to the computation fluid for small cyclone by Kim and Lee [14]. In recent years, with the
dynamics (CFD) approach. In detail, the equilibrium-orbit model, development of modern CFD techniques it is now possible to com-
as an early methodology of particle separation, determines the par- putationally simulate the gas-particle fluid flow and separation in
ticle size for which centrifugal force is exactly balanced by the drag cyclone separators. Boysan et al. [15], Zhou and Soo [16] and Grif-
force. Correspondingly, the collection efficiency for the critically fiths and Boysan [17] promoted this approach to comprehensive
sized particle is often assumed to be 50%. This model was succes- applications. Although the CFD approach can provide the relatively
sively developed by Lapple [1], Barth [2] and Muschelknautz and accurate predictions, it usually needs to solve the complex govern-
Trefz [3], Dirgo and Leith [4] and Iozia and Leith [5], and applied ing equations and spend huge computational cost. From this
perspective, simple, accurate and acceptable models for cyclone
⇑ Tel.: +86 21 55272740; fax: +86 21 55273704. separation efficiency are still required.
E-mail address: zhaobingtao@usst.edu.cn
1383-5866/$ - see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.006
172 B. Zhao / Separation and Purification Technology 85 (2012) 171–177
Nomenclature
where
In most theories the actual cyclone body diameter (cylindrical
diameter) is usually considered as the characteristic dimension to ðD BÞðS þ l hÞ
Dc ¼ D ð3Þ
calculate the separation efficiency. However, for a conventional Hh
cylindrical-conical type cyclone, the distance that particles move or
to the cyclone wall is significantly different between the cylindrical " 2 #
and the conical part of cyclone. It is directly related to the particle pD2 h pD2 ðH hÞ B B
separation and collection capability. In addition, the previous V cs ¼ þ 1þ þ for l > H S ð4Þ
4 4 3 D D
time-of-flight models [8,9] did not take fully into account the effects
of the short-circuit flow near the bottom of cyclone outlet duct and
exchange flow between outer and inner vortex flow on the effective 1=2
residence time. In order to describe gas-particle separation in cy- V cs
Rw ¼ ð5Þ
clone separators as accurate and simple as possible, this work fo- pH
cuses on developing a simplified theoretical model for predicting
where l is called as the natural vortex length of cyclone separator. It
cyclone efficiency based on the time-of-flight model. The model is
is defined as the vertical distance from the bottom of the vortex
established based on the revised cyclone diameter and effective res-
idence time. Subsequently, the availability of the model is evaluated
by comparison with experimental data and other classical theories
D
under the different cyclone geometries and operating conditions.
De
2. Theoretical approach
1=2 B
V cs
Rw ¼ ð2Þ
pðS þ lÞ
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of typical cyclone dimensions.
B. Zhao / Separation and Purification Technology 85 (2012) 171–177 173
S
ð7Þ
on the particle (the drag force obeys Stokes’ law) in the radial
direction is given by:
Qdf
2
d r 18l dr v 2hp
2
þ 2
¼0 ð8Þ
dt C c qp dp dt r
dz
2.2. Gas-particle dynamics c
Table 1
Geometrical dimensions and operating conditions of cyclones compared in this work.
Cyclone I: [24]; Cyclone II: [4]; Cyclone III: [5]; Cyclone IV: [10]; Cyclone V: [25]; Cyclone VI: [26].
100 passes through the region between the gas outlet (vortex finder)
5 wall and equivalent wall. When the incoming flow Q arrives at
8 4
the bottom of the gas outlet duct, about 4–16% with an average
Separation efficiency η (%)
2v rp ðRw Þt res 80
g ¼ 1 exp ð16Þ
Rw
where v rp ðRw Þ is the particle settling velocity at the equivalent wall 60 1- Barth (1956)
and is calculated according to Eq. (11): 2- Leith & Licht (1971)
2 4 6 3 3- Dietz (1981)
2
! 40 4- Mothes & Loffler (1988)
C c qp dp v 2
h ðRw Þ
v rp ðRw Þ ¼ ð17Þ 5- Li & Wang (1989)
18l Rw 8 6- Iozia & Leith (1990)
20 7 7- Clift et al. (1991)
where v h ðRw Þ can be calculated according to Eq. (7): 8- Present model
1 Experimental data
v hw 0
v h ðRw Þ ¼ ð18Þ 0 2 4 6 8 10
ðRw =Rw Þ½1 þ Pð1 Rw =Rw Þ
Particle size dp (μm)
tres is the total residence time of gas flow. To analyze tres the gas
flow distribution in the modified cyclone is also indicated in Fig. 2. Fig. 5. Comparison of present model with experimental data from Ref. [4] and other
It can be seen that the incoming flow Q is unchanged during it theoretical models.
B. Zhao / Separation and Purification Technology 85 (2012) 171–177 175
100 100
5
80 80
6 8 8 3
60 60 1- Barth (1956)
1- Barth (1956) 4
2- Leith & Licht (1971) 2- Leith & Licht (1971)
2 3 3- Dietz (1981) 2 7 3- Dietz (1981)
40 4 40
4- Mothes & Loffler (1988) 4- Mothes & Loffler (1988)
5- Li & Wang (1989) 6 5- Li & Wang (1989)
7 6- Iozia & Leith (1990) 6- Iozia & Leith (1990)
20 20 7- Clift et al. (1991)
7- Clift et al. (1991)
8- Present model 8- Present model
5 Experimental data
1 Experimental data 0
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
Fig. 6. Comparison of present model with experimental data from Ref. [5] and other Fig. 8. Comparison of present model with experimental data from Ref. [25] and
theoretical models. other theoretical models.
Table 2
Comparison of mean squared error (MSE) of efficiency between theoretical model and experimental data.
Cyclone I: [24]; Cyclone II: [4]; Cyclone III: [5]; Cyclone IV: [10]; Cyclone V: [25]; Cyclone VI: [26].
presents relatively poor prediction for cyclone efficiency because it can be accurately modeled. Moreover, due to the limitation of
did not take into consideration the effect of conical shape on the assumptions, the present model is merely suitable to be applied
average distance that particles move to the wall. As important hy- in the dilute, instead of dense gas-particle two-phase flow separa-
brid multi-region models, the Dietz’s and Mothes & Löffler’s mod- tion in cyclones. In the later occasion, the effects of particle load,
els applied the different simplified methods to develop their agglomeration and collision on separation performance can not
models, respectively. For the large and moderate scale cyclones, be easily ignored.
the Mothes and Löffler’s model has good performance on
prediction of cyclone separation efficiency while the Dietz’s model 4. Conclusions
provides the low prediction on separation efficiency due to not
considering the effect of radial particle dispersion and re- A new simple theoretical separation model is proposed to deter-
entrainment at the interface of adjacent region. But for the small mine the collection efficiency for cyclone separators. The model
cyclones, on account of both the short natural vortex length and considers the effects of the cyclone geometrical shape and the
the weak turbulent dispersion the Dietz’s model appears to be effective residence time affected by the short-circuit flow and the
superior to the Mothes and Löffler’s model. As a whole, the particle exchange flow on the gas-particle separation process. The result
separation efficiencies by the present model are consistent with demonstrates that the present model has considerable usefulness
that by the Iozia and Leith’s model, a modified Barth’s model, and reliability when compared with the experimental data as well
which also shows the enormous usefulness for the cyclone separa- as several classical models on the prediction for cyclone efficiency.
tor with the different operating conditions in the present cases. Nevertheless, additional work is still necessary to improve the
This result may be related to the model parameters (particle cut present model and make it more efficient and extensive, particu-
diameter and slope exponent) which are obtained from the fitting larly in the operating conditions of high temperature, high pres-
for large number of experimental data using regression analysis. sure and high particle load, etc.
Additionally, although the Li and Wang’s model gives a similar pre-
diction with the Barth’s model, further investigation indicates that Acknowledgement
it is in conflict with the experimental and other theoretical results
when being used to exame the effect of variation of cyclone outlet This work was sponsored by Shanghai Natural Science Founda-
diameter on separation efficiency [27]. Since this model simplified tion (No. 08ZR1415100).
the cyclone flow as 2D (tangential and radial direction) curved
channel flow, the increasing gas outlet diameter shortens the radial References
separation distance of the curved channel. As a consequence, their
model gives a high prediction on separation efficiency. In fact, [1] C.E. Lapple, Gravity and centrifugal separation, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. Q. 11
(1950) 40–48.
however, increasing gas outlet diameter increases the possibility
[2] W. Barth, Design and layout of the cyclone separator on the basis of new
of particle escape from gas outlet duct via short-circuit flow, result- investigations, B.W.K. 8 (1956) 1–9.
ing in the decrease of separation efficiency. [3] E. Muschelknautz, M. Trefz, Pressure drop and separation efficiency in
It should be noted that in cyclone the particle dispersion and re- cyclones, VDI-Heat Atlas Lj (1992) 1–8.
[4] J. Dirgo, D. Leith, Cyclone collection efficiency: comparison of experimental
entrainment caused by turbulence and particle concentration gra- results with theoretical predictions, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 4 (1985) 401–415.
dient also affect the separation efficiency. In this work, due to using [5] D.L. Iozia, D. Leith, The logistic function and cyclone fractional efficiency,
the assumption of the radial back-mixing, particles can be regarded Aerosol Sci. Technol. 12 (1990) 598–606.
[6] T. Chan, M. Lippmann, Particle collection efficiencies of air sampling cyclones:
as having no radial concentration gradient and be treated as uni- an empirical theory, Environ. Sci. Technol. 11 (4) (1977) 377–382. doi:10.1021/
form distribution. Therefore, particle turbulent dispersion coeffi- es60127a003.
cient in the cyclone [12,13,28,29] is not included in the present [7] M.E. Moore, A.R. McFarland, Performance modeling of single-inlet aerosol
sampling cyclones, Environ. Sci. Technol. 27 (9) (1993) 1842–1848.
simplified model. Actually, smaller particles with less centrifugal doi:10.1021/es00046a012.
force may be more easily influenced by turbulence within cyclone [8] D. Leith, W. Licht, The collection efficiency of cyclone type particle collectors: a
and be much more uniform in radial distribution, while larger par- new theoretical approach, in: air pollution and its control, AIChE Symp. Ser. 68
(1972) 196–206.
ticles with large centrifugal force have a significant concentration [9] R. Clift, M. Ghadiri, A.C. Hoffmann, A critique of two models for cyclone
gradient from cyclone wall to core [4,30]. As a result, for some cy- performance, AIChE J. 37 (1991) 285–289.
clone designs and operating conditions, e.g., experimental data [10] B. Zhao, Development of a new method for evaluating cyclone efficiency,
Chem. Eng. Proc. 44 (2005) 447–451.
from Dirgo and Leith (Fig. 5), the predicted efficiency curve appears
[11] P.W. Dietz, Collection efficiency of cyclone separators, AIChE J. 27 (1981) 888–
to have a relatively little steepness for larger particles. 892.
In addition, extremely high turbulence may enhance the parti- [12] H. Mothes, F. Löffler, Prediction of particle removal in cyclone separators, Int.
cle re-entrainment effect near the wall, resulting in the decrease Chem. Eng. 23 (1988) 231–240.
[13] E. Li, Y. Wang, A new theory of cyclone separators, AIChE J. 35 (1989) 666–669.
of cyclone efficiency to some extent. It is expected that the present [14] C.H. Kim, J.W. Lee, A new efficiency model for small cyclones considering the
model will be improved if the accurate re-entrainment mechanism boundary-layer effect, J. Aerosol Sci. 32 (2001) 251–269.
B. Zhao / Separation and Purification Technology 85 (2012) 171–177 177
[15] F. Boysan, W.H. Ayers, J.A. Swithenbank, A fundamental mathematical [23] A.C. Hoffmann, L.E. Stein, Gas Cyclones and Swirl Tubes: Principles, Design and
modelling approach for cyclone design, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. (London) 60 Operation, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2007.
(1982) 222–230. [24] J.M. Beekmans, C.J. Kim, Analysis of the efficiency of reverse flow cyclones, Can.
[16] L.X. Zhou, S.L. Soo, Gas–solids flow and collection of solids in a cyclone J. Chem. Eng. 55 (1977) 640–643.
separator, Powder Technol. 63 (1990) 45–53. [25] J.C. Kim, K.W. Lee, Experimental study of particle collection by small cyclones,
[17] W.D. Griffiths, F. Boysan, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and empirical Aerosol Sci. Technol. 12 (1990) 1003–1015.
modeling of a number of cyclone samplers, J. Aerosol Sci. 27 (1996) 281–304. [26] R. Xiang, S.H. Park, K.W. Lee, Effects of cone dimension on cyclone
[18] R.M. Alexander, Fundamentals of cyclone design and operation, Proc. Aust. performance, J. Aerosol Sci. 32 (2001) 549–561.
Inst. Mining Metall. (New Series) 152–153 (1949) 203–228. [27] B. Zhao, Development of a dimensionless logistic model for predicting cyclone
[19] Z. Ji, X. Wu, M. Shi, Experimental research on the natural turning length in the separation efficiency, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 44 (2010) 1105–1112.
cyclone, Proceedings of Filtech Europa ’91 Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany 2 [28] A. Ogawa, Diffusion of the fine solid particles in the turbulent rotational air
(1991) 583–589. flow in the vortex chamber, Bull. JSME 27 (226) (1984) 763–772.
[20] H. Büttner, Dimensionless representation of particle separation characteristic [29] R. Salcedo, M.A. Coelho, Turbulent dispersion coefficients in cyclone flow: an
of cyclones, J. Aerosol Sci. 30 (10) (1999) 1291–1302. empirical approach, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 77 (1999) 609–617.
[21] F. Qian, M. Zhang, Study of the natural vortex length of a cyclone with response [30] H. Mothes, F. Löffler, Investigation of cyclone grade efficiency using a light
surface methodology, Comput. Chem. Eng. 29 (10) (2005) 2155–2162. scattering particle size measuring technique, J. Aerosol Sci. 13 (1982) 184–185.
[22] A.C. Hoffmann, R. de Jonge, H. Arends, C. Hanrats, Evidence of the ‘natural
vortex length’ and its effect on the separation efficiency of gas cyclones, Filtr.
Sep. 32 (8) (1995) 799–804.