Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tableting Excipient
Dakshinamurthy Devanga Chinta, Richard A. Graves, Sarala Pamujula,
Spray-Dried Chitosan
43
44 D. D. CHINTA ET AL.
was used for each measurement. Each measurement was per- Dissolution Study
formed in triplicate. The dissolution rates of the tablets were monitored using a
The surface morphology of the granules was examined by a Varian Automated dissolution apparatus fitted with a Cary-50
Hitachi 3000N variable pressure scanning electron microscope Tablet Spectrophotometer (Model VK 7000, Varian Inc., Palo
(SEM) (Hitachi, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) following mounting Alto, CA, USA). A volume of 900 mL of double-distilled
of samples on metal stubs. The analytical parameters included water was used as the dissolution medium and the temperature
an accelerating voltage of 10 keV, a working distance of was maintained at 37 ± 1°C. The USP II rotating paddle disso-
13.5 mm, and a vacuum of 40 Pa in variable pressure mode. lution method was used at a rotation speed of 50 rpm. A spe-
Because the samples were analyzed in variable pressure mode, cific volume of the dissolution medium was withdrawn
the backscatter detector BSE2 was used. automatically at a preset time and analyzed spectrophotometri-
cally in-line at a wavelength of 296 nm.
Thermal Characterization
Thermal analysis of the granules was performed using a Statistical Analysis
DSC (TA 2920) fitted with a refrigeration unit (TA Instru- Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism,
ments, New Castle, DE, USA). Low-molecular-weight chito- version 5.0 software package (GraphPad Software, Inc, San
san, lactose, and spray-dried granules were used for thermal Diego, CA, USA). The bulk density, tap density, average particle
characterization. About 5 mg of a sample was weighed, size, and dissolution data were reported as mean and standard
crimped into an aluminum pan and analyzed at a scanning rate deviation of three measurements. The bulk density and tap density
of 5°C/min. The temperature at the peak of endotherms was were compared separately using one-way analysis of variance
calculated using TA universal analysis software. (ANOVA). Cochran’s test was used to determine the homogene-
ity of variance of the data. A p value of <.05 was considered as
evidence of a significant difference. In the event of a significant
Density Measurement difference, the mean values were further compared using Student–
The bulk and tap densities were measured in a 10-mL glass Newman–Keul’s multiple range test (SNK) to determine which
cylinder and the sample weights were maintained at 10 g. For formulation was significantly different from the others.
bulk density measurement, the sample was placed into the
graduated cylinder and the sides were tapped slightly to
achieve uniform horizontal level. The same sample was tapped RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
100 times prior to the tap density measurement. The physical properties of the granules are listed in Table 2.
A comparison of the particle size of the granules showed that
the particles were heterogeneous in size with a range between
Preparation of Direct Compression Tablets 18 and 1,538 μm. The granules prepared with the low-molecu-
To evaluate the tableting properties of the spray-dried lar-weight chitosan (A, D, E) showed relatively smaller median
lactose/chitosan granules, 1 g of the granules was mixed thor- particle size (422, 153, 499 μm, respectively) compared with
oughly with 54 mg of sodium bicarbonate and compressed into the medium- and high-molecular-weight chitosan (788 and 683
tablets. The tablets were prepared by manually feeding the μm). Despite slight differences in the median particle sizes, all
mixture into a tablet die of a hydraulic press (Carver Inc., five granules showed no practical differences in granules size
Wabash, IN, USA). The tablets were compressed at 5,000 lb ranges. A comparison of the SEM pictures of the granules
force using a flat-faced tablet punch and die with a flat steel showed that all five formulations showed similar surface
plate as a lower retainer. morphology (Figure 1).
TABLE 2
Physical Characteristics of the Lactose/Chitosan Granules
Bulk Density Results of Tap Density Results of Particle Size (μm)
Formulation (g/cc) (±SD) SNKa Test (g/cc) (±SD) SNKa Test Carr Index (80% Range)
A 0.16 (0.005) A > B = C > D >E 0.18 (0.008) A > B = C > D >E 11.1 422 (42–1,060)
B 0.13 (0.002) 0.15 (0.008) 13.3 788 (43–1,538)
C 0.13 (0.004) 0.15 (0.006) 13.3 683 (21–1,489)
D 0.12 (0.006) 0.14 (0.005) 14.3 153 (18–520)
E 0.10 (0.004) 0.12 (0.008) 16.7 400 (41–1,353)
a
Student–Newman–Keul’s multiple range.
46 D. D. CHINTA ET AL.
A B C
D E
DSC is a valuable tool in the detection of changes that might corresponds to water removal as reported by Mladenovska et al.
occur during processing. Thermal characterization of the granules (2007). Spray-dried lactose has been reported to be amorphous,
after spray drying, and comparing the results with the thermo- and upon heating recrystallizes at about 172°C to form α-lactose
grams of lactose and chitosan before processing, can help deter- with a melting endotherm at approximately 217°C (Corrigan,
mine the effect of spray drying on these adjuvants. Because the Healy, & Corrigan, 2002). The DSC thermograms of the granules
effect would be most pronounced at the highest concentrations, showed that lactose was in the amorphous form and did not
and the concentration of the lactose solution was essentially the recrystallize upon heating as evidenced by the absence of the char-
same for all batches, DSC was conducted on the granules contain- acteristic melting endotherm at 217°C and the absence of a recrys-
ing the highest concentration of chitosan (Formulation E; prepared tallization exotherm at 172°C. Based on these findings, lactose
by using the solution containing 2.5% low-molecular-weight and chitosan appear to be in the form of a molecular dispersion,
chitosan) and compared with the thermograms of each of lactose which prevents the recrystallization of lactose upon heating.
and chitosan alone, as shown in Figure 2. DSC of lactose was As seen in Figure 3, the melting peak of propranolol was
characteristic of α-lactose monohydrate as evidenced by a dehy- absent in the thermograms of the granules, and new peaks in
dration endotherm peaking at approximately 145°C and a melting the range between 180 and 200°C appeared in the granules
endotherm peaking at approximately 218°C. DSC of chitosan containing the lower amounts of chitosan (1 and 1.9%). The
shows only a broad endotherm in the vicinity of 100°C and which intensities of these new peaks were reduced upon increasing
0
III 0
–1 I I
II
–1
Heat flow (W/g)
–2 II
Heat flow (W/g)
III
–2
–3 IV
–4 –3
–5 –4
–100 –50 0 50 100 150 200 250 –50 0 50 100 150 200 250
Exo Up Universal V3.9A TA Instruments Exo up Universal V3.9A TA Instruments
FIGURE 2. DSC thermograms of chitosan (I), lactose (II), and spray-dried FIGURE 3. DSC thermograms of propranolol (I), granules containing low-
granules (III). molecular-weight chitosan 1% (II), 1.9% (III), and 2.5% (IV).
SPRAY-DRIED CHITOSAN 47
(2007–12)-ENH-PKSFI-PRS-02, and Military Infectious Dis- peptides across intestinal epithelia: In vitro evaluation in Caco-2 cell mono-
ease Research Program grant W81XWH-07-1-0136. layers. Int. J. Pharm., 159, 243–253.
LeHoux, J. G., & Grondin, F. (1993). Some effects of chitosan on liver
function in the rat. Endocrinology, 132, 1078–1084.
Mladenovska, K., Cruaud, O., Richomme, P., Belamie, E., Raicki, R. S.,
REFERENCES Venier-Julienne, M.-C., Popovski, E., & Goracinova, K.(2007). 5-ASA
Agnihotri, S. A., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2007). Chitosan nanogranules for pro- loaded chitosan-Ca-alginate microparticles: Preparation and physicochemi-
longed delivery of timolol maleate. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 33, 1254–1262. cal characterization. Int. J. Pharm., 345, 59–69.
Aspden, T. J., Adler, J., Davis, S. S., Skaugrud, O., & Illum, L. (1995). Nunthanid, J., Laungtana-anan, M., Sriamornsak, P., Limmatvapirat, S.,
Chitosan as a nasal delivery system: Evaluation of the effect of chitosan Puttipipatkhachorn, S., Lim, L. Y., & Khor, E. (2004). Characterization of
on mucociliary clearance rate in the frog palate model. Int. J. Pharm., chitosan acetate as a binder for sustained release tablets. J. Control. Release,
122, 69–78. 99, 15–26.
Aspden, T. J., Manson, J. D. T., Jones, N., Lowe, J., Skaugrud, O., & Illum, Ormrod, D. J., Holmes, C. C., & Miller, T. E. (1998). Dietary chitosan inhibits
L. (1997). Chitosan as a nasal delivery system: The effect of chitosan hypercholesterolaemia and atherogenesis in the apolipoprotein E-deficient
on in vitro and in vivo mucociliary transport rates. J. Pharm. Sci., 86, mouse model of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis, 138, 329–334.
509–513. Rege, P. R., Garmis, R. J., & Block, L. H. (2003). Spray-dried chitinosans. Part II:
Aspden, T., Illum, L., & Skaugrud, O. (1996). Chitosan as a nasal delivery sys- In vitro drug release from tablets made from spray-dried chitinosans. Int. J.
tem: Evaluation of insulin absorption enhancement and effect on nasal Pharm., 252, 53–59.
membrane integrity using rat models. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 4, 23–31. Ritthidej, G. C., Chomto, P., Pummangura, S., & Menasveta, P. (1994). Chitin
Aspden, T., Illum, L., & Skaugrud, O. (1997). The effect of chronic nasal and chitosan as disintegrants in paracetamol tablets. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.,
application of chitosan solution on cilia beat frequency in Guinea pigs. Int. 20, 2109–2134.
J. Pharm., 153, 137–146. Sawayanagi, Y., Nambu, N., & Nagai, T. (1982a). Directly compressed tablets
Calvo, P., Vila-Jato, J. L., & Alonso, M. J. (1997). Evaluation of cationic poly- containing chitin or chitosan in addition to lactose or potato starch. Chem.
mer-coated nanocapsules as ocular drug carriers. Int. J. Pharm., 153, 41–50. Pharm. Bull., 30, 2935–2940.
Corrigan, D. O., Healy, A. M., & Corrigan, O. I. (2002). The effect of spray Sawayanagi, Y., Nambu, N., & Nagai, T. (1982b). Directly compressed tablets
drying solutions of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and lactose/PEG on their containing chitin or chitosan in addition to mannitol. Chem. Pharm. Bull.,
physicochemical properties. Int. J. Pharm., 235, 193–205. 30, 4216–4218.
Felt, O., Buri, P., & Gurny, R. (1998). Chitosan: A unique polysaccharide for Sezer, A. D., & Akbuga, J. (1995). Controlled release of piroxicam from chito-
drug delivery. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 24, 979–993. san beads. Int. J. Pharm., 121, 113–116.
Gerber, J. J., & Lotter, A. P. (1993). Compatibility study between propranolol Takeuchi, H., Yamamoto, H., Niwa, T., Hino, T., & Kawashima, Y. (1996).
hydrochloride and tablet excipients using differential scanning calorimetry. Enteral absorption of insulin in rats from mucoadhesive chitosan coated
Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 19(5), 623–629. liposomes. Pharm. Res., 13, 896–901.
He, P., Davis, S. S., & Illum, L. (1999). Chitosan microspheres prepared by Takeuchi, H., Yasuji, T., Yamamoto, H., & Kawashima, Y. (1999). Spray-
spray drying. Int. J. Pharm., 187, 53–65. dried lactose composite particles containing an ion complex of alginate-
Illum, L. (1998). Chitosan and its use as a pharmaceutical excipient. Pharm. chitosan for designing a dry-coated tablet having a time-controlled releasing
Res., 15, 1326–1331. function. Pharm. Res., 17, 94–99.
Karlsen, J. (1991). Excipient properties of chitosan. Manuf. Chem., 62, 18–19. Tarimci, N., & Ermis, D. (1997). Sustained release characteristics and pharma-
Knapczyk, J. (1993). Excipient ability of chitosan for direct tableting. Int. cokinetic parameters of ketoprofen suppositories using chitosan. Int.
J. Pharm., 89, 1–7. J. Pharm., 147, 71–77.
Kokil, S., Patil, P., Mahadik, K., & Paradkar, A. (2005). Studies on spray-dried Upadrashta, S. M., Katikaneni, P. R., & Nuessle, N. O. (1992). Chitosan as a
mixtures of chitosan and hydrolyzed gelatin as tablet binder: A technical tablet binder. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 18, 2701–2708.
note. AAPS PharmSciTech., 6, E437– E443. Wells, J. (2002). Pharmaceutical preformulation: The physicochemical proper-
Kotze, A. F., De Leeuw, B. J., LueBen, H. L., De Boer, A. G., Verhoef, J. C., ties of drug substances In M. E. Aulton (Ed.), Pharmaceutics: The science of
& Juginger, H. E. (1997). Chitosan for enhanced delivery of therapeutic dosage form design (pp. 133–134). New York: Churchill Livingstone.