Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The above rock property data are essential for reservoir Connate (interstitial) water saturation Swc is important
engineering calculations as they directly affect both the primarily because it reduces the amount of space
quantity and the distribution of hydrocarbons and, available between oil and gas. It is generally not
when combined with fluid properties, control the flow uniformly distributed throughout the reservoir but
of the existing phases (i.e., gas, oil, and water) within varies with permeability, lithology, and height above the
the reservoir. free water table.
• Water-oil capillary pressure (denoted as Pcwo) The transition zone is then defined as the vertical
• Gas-oil capillary pressure (denoted as Pcgo) thickness over which the water saturation ranges from
• Gas-water capillary pressure (denoted as Pcgw) 100% saturation to irreducible water saturation Swc.
The WOC (water-oil contact) is defined as the • Only single phase present at 100% pore space
“uppermost depth in the reservoir where a 100% water saturation
saturation exists.”
This measured permeability at 100% saturation of a
The GOC (gas-oil contact) is defined as the “minimum single phase is called the absolute permeability of the
depth at which a 100% liquid, i.e., oil + water, saturation rock.
exists in the reservoir.”
Dry gas is usually used (air, N2, He) in permeability
Free water level is defined by zero capillary pressure. determination because of its convenience and
availability and to minimize fluid-rock reaction.
Leverett J-Function
Capillary pressure data are obtained on small core The Klinkenberg Effect
samples that represent an extremely small part of the Klinkenberg (1941) discovered that permeability
reservoir, and, therefore, it is necessary to combine all measurements made with air as the flowing fluid
capillary data to classify a particular reservoir. The fact showed different results from permeability
that the capillary pressure-saturation curves of nearly measurements made with a liquid as the flowing fluid.
all naturally porous materials have many features in
common has led to attempts to devise some general Klinkenberg suggested that the slope c is a function of
equation describing all such curves. Leverett (1941) the following factors:
approached the problem from the standpoint of • Absolute permeability k, i.e., permeability of medium
dimensional analysis. to a single phase completely filling the pores of the
medium kL.
The J-function was originally proposed as a means of • Type of the gas used in measuring the permeability,
converting all capillary-pressure data to a universal e.g., air.
curve. • Average radius of the rock capillaries.
The equation that defines permeability in terms of Jones (1972) studied the gas slip phenomena for a
measurable quantities is called Darcy’s Law. Darcy group of cores for which porosity, liquid permeability kL
developed a fluid flow equation that has since become (absolute permeability), and air permeability were
one of the standard mathematical tools of the determined.
petroleum engineer.
Averaging Absolute Permeabilities
There are several factors that must be considered as There are three simple permeability-averaging
possible sources of error in determining reservoir techniques that are commonly used to determine an
permeability. These factors are: appropriate average permeability to represent an
equivalent homogeneous system. These are:
1. Core sample may not be representative of the
reservoir rock because of reservoir heterogeneity. • Weighted-average permeability
2. Core recovery may be incomplete. • Harmonic-average permeability
3. Permeability of the core may be altered when it is • Geometric-average permeability
cut, or when it is cleaned and dried in preparation for
analysis. This problem is likely to occur when the rock Weighted-Average Permeability
contains reactive clays. This averaging method is used to determine the average
4. Sampling process may be biased. There is a permeability of layered-parallel beds with different
temptation to select the best parts of the core for permeabilities.
analysis.
Harmonic-Average Permeability
The following conditions must exist during the Permeability variations can occur laterally in a reservoir
measurement of permeability: as well as in the vicinity of a well bore.
Absolute Permeability Correlations The choice of lower limits of porosity and permeability
Calhoun (1976) suggested that in an ideal pore will depend upon such individual characteristics as
configuration of uniform structure, the irreducible • Total reservoir volume
connate water would be independent of permeability, • Total range of permeability values
lower permeabilities being obtained merely by a scaled • Total range of porosity values
reduction in particle size. • Distribution of the permeability and porosity values
Calhoun (1976) pointed out that any correlation found
between various reservoir properties would be RESERVOIR HETEROGENEITY
anticipated to apply only within the rather narrow limits The reservoir heterogeneity is then defined as a
of a single reservoir or perhaps of a given formation. variation in reservoir properties as a function of space.
Geertsma (1957) points out that there are three The degree of homogeneity of a reservoir property is a
different types of compressibility that must be number that characterizes the departure from
distinguished in rocks: uniformity or constancy of that particular measured
• Rock-matrix compressibility, cr Is defined as the property through the thickness of the reservoir.
fractional change in volume of the solid rock material
(grains) with a unit change in pressure. The following are the two most widely used descriptors
• Rock-bulk compressibility, cB Is defined as the of the vertical heterogeneity of the formation:
fractional change in volume of the bulk volume of the • Dykstra-Parsons permeability variation V
rock with a unit change in pressure. • Lorenz coefficient L
• Pore compressibility, cp The pore compressibility
coefficient is defined as the fractional change in pore The Dykstra-Parsons Permeability Variation
volume of the rock with a unit change in pressure Dykstra and Parsons (1950) introduced the concept of
the permeability variation coefficient V, which is a
NET PAY THICKNESS statistical measure of non-uniformity of a set of data. It
The reservoir is necessarily confined to certain geologic is generally applied to the property of permeability but
and fluid boundaries, i.e., GOC, WOC, and GWC, so can be extended to treat other rock properties.
accuracy is imperative. Within the confines of such
boundaries, oil is contained in what is commonly The required computational steps for determining the
referred to as Gross Pay. coefficient V are summarized below:
Step 1. Arrange the core samples in decreasing
Net Pay is that part of the reservoir thickness that permeability sequence, i.e., descending order.
contributes to oil recovery and is defined by imposing Step 2. For each sample, calculate the percentage of
the following criteria: thickness with permeability greater than this sample.
• Lower limit of porosity
Step 3. Using a log-probability graph paper, plot AREAL HETEROGENEITY
permeability values on the log scale and the % of Johnson and co-workers (1966) devised a well testing
thickness on the probability scale. This special graph procedure, called pulse testing, to generate rock
paper is shown in Figure 4-29. properties data between wells. In this procedure, a
Step 4. Draw the best straight line through the points. series of producing rate changes or pluses is made at
Step 5. Read the corresponding permeability values at one well with the response being measured at adjacent
84.1% and 50% of thickness. These two values are wells.
designated as k84.1 and k50.
Step 6. The Dykstra-Parsons permeability variation is These rock properties are commonly called regionalized
defined by the following expression: variables. These variables usually have the following
contradictory characteristics:
• Arandom characteristic showing erratic behavior from
point to point
The Dykstra-Parsons method is commonly referred to as • Astructural characteristic reflecting the connections
a Permeability Ordering Technique. among data points
In water flooding calculations, it is frequently desired to Five simple conventional interpolation and/or
divide the reservoir into layers that have equal extrapolation methods are briefly discussed below:
thickness and different permeability. The log-
probability scale can be used in this case to assign the • The Polygon Method
permeability scale into equal percent increments and to This technique is essentially based on assigning the
read the corresponding permeability at the midpoint of nearest measured value of the regionalized variable to
each interval. the designated location. This implies that all the
weighting factors, i.e., λi, in Equation 4-72 are set equal
Lorenz Coefficient L to zero except the corresponding λi for the nearest
Schmalz and Rahme (1950) introduced a single point is set equal to one.
parameter that describes the degree of heterogeneity
within a pay zone section. The term is called Lorenz • The Inverse Distance Method
coefficient and varies between zero, for a completely With inverse distance, data points are weighted during
homogeneous system, to one for a completely interpolation such that the influences of one data point
heterogeneous system. relative to another declines with distance from the
desired location.
The following steps summarize the methodology of
calculating the Lorenz coefficient: • The Inverse Distance Squared Method
Step 1. Arrange all the available permeability values in a The method assigns a weight to each measured
descending order. regionalized variable by the inverse distance squared of
Step 2. Calculate the cumulative permeability capacity the sample to the point being estimated
Σkh and cumulative volume capacity Σφh.
Step 3. Normalize both cumulative capacities such that ● The Triangulation Method
each cumulative capacity ranges from 0 to 1. The triangulation method is designed to remove
Step 4. Plot the normalized cumulative permeability possible discontinuities between adjacent points by
capacity versus the normalized cumulative volume fitting a plane through three samples that surround the
capacity on a Cartesian scale. point being estimated. The method is based on
Miller and Lents (1947) suggested that the fluid selecting the nearest three locations with measured
movement in the reservoir remains in the same relative data values that form a triangle
vertical position, i.e., remains in the same elevation, and
that the permeability in this elevation (layer) is better ● Delaunay Triangulation
described by the geometric mean average . Instead of solving the three simultaneous equations
permeability. This method is called the positional and substituting the coordinates of the point of interest
method. into the solution, the permeability value can be directly
calculated