Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Materialism Pathways: The Processes that Create and Perpetuate Materialism
Marsha L. Richins
PII: S1057-7408(17)30051-7
DOI: doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2017.07.006
Reference: JCPS 591
Please cite this article as: Richins, M.L., Materialism Pathways: The Processes
that Create and Perpetuate Materialism, Journal of Consumer Psychology (2017),
doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2017.07.006
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Marsha L. Richinsa
PT
University of Missouri
RI
SC
NU
MA
a
Trulaske College of Business, University of Missouri, Cornell Hall, Columbia, MO
D
TE
The author thanks Omid Kamran-Disfani and Yiwen Chen, doctoral students at the
P
University of Missouri, for their assistance in collecting articles for this review.
CE
Abstract
Materialism has been examined in many social science disciplines from multiple perspectives.
This review synthesizes this extensive literature into two organizing frameworks that describe
PT
how materialism develops in children and how materialism is reinforced and perpetuated in
RI
adulthood. The major components of the developmental model are the daily event cycle,
developmental tasks, cultural influence, and family environment, all of which interact to
SC
influence how materialistic a child becomes. The reinforcement model describes how personal
NU
qualities that materialists tend to possess make them more vulnerable to threats in daily events,
resulting in psychological discomfort. The desire to reduce this discomfort, in conjunction with
MA
the transformative powers that materialists ascribe to acquisition, results in actions and outcomes
that reinforce materialistic tendencies. Suggestions for furthering the study of materialism are
D
TE
also included.
P
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
Some consumer needs are best met by things. There’s no substitute for a good umbrella
on a rainy day, a smart phone provides convenience in communication, and nonstick cookware
PT
makes after dinner cleanup easier. But products are limited in what they can do for us, and some
RI
needs are better met by experiences than by things. The desire for emotional security and
tenderness is fulfilled by spending time with family and friends. A sense of competence and
SC
achievement can be enhanced by learning to play tennis or how to fix a bicycle flat. People meet
NU
their needs with a mix of the material and experiential. A family camping adventure, after all, is
more successful if there’s a cook stove and tent along for the trip. But some people place a
MA
disproportionate emphasis on things to meet their needs, and they highly value acquisition as a
means to achieve important life goals. Western culture has labeled these people materialists.
D
TE
Materialism has been the subject of debate and discourse throughout recorded history
(see Belk, 1983, and Rudmin & Kilbourne, 1996, for reviews). More recently, scholarly research
P
has undertaken empirical examination of materialism. This review synthesizes this burgeoning
CE
empirical literature by presenting two frameworks that describe how materialism develops in
AC
individuals and how it is sustained by responses to events in daily life. These frameworks focus
countries around the world, regardless of level of economic development (Belk, 1988), the
development and expression of materialism is culture-specific (Ger & Belk, 1996), and a
Conceptualizing Materialism
Before describing how materialism develops, it is essential to define it. Scholars have
used varying conceptualizations of materialism, and the term can mean different things to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
Fournier and Richins (1991) examined how it has been conceived in the social science literature
PT
American consumers. The authors concluded that materialism is best conceptualized as a value
RI
orientation in which materialists place a high value on acquisition as a means to reach important
life goals. This value-oriented approach accords well with the first formal characterization of
SC
materialism in the consumer behavior literature, which described materialism as the importance a
NU
consumer places on worldly possessions (Belk, 1985).
Following on this foundational work, Richins and Dawson (1992) defined materialism as
MA
“the importance a person places on possessions and their acquisition as a necessary or desirable
form of conduct to reach desired end states” (p. 307). This definition is widely accepted and is
D
TE
the one used for purposes of this review. Richins and Dawson further refined understanding of
the materialism construct by delineating three facets. First, acquisition centrality is the extent to
P
which possessions and acquisition are a central focus of one’s life. Second, the pursuit of
CE
happiness through acquisition is the belief that acquiring more or different things will increase
AC
happiness and well-being. The third facet, possession defined success, is the tendency to gauge
the success of oneself and of others by possessions. Thus, materialism is characterized as a set of
value-laden beliefs that guide people’s daily lives and their consumption decisions.
behavior or set of behaviors. More specifically, counter to the impression of some, materialism is
not the consumption of luxury goods, nor is it conspicuous consumption. Although materialists
may engage in these consumption practices, this relationship is not deterministic. Materialism
involves the desire for more, but the nature of that “more” is unspecified.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
Furthermore, materialism is not a dichotomy, and the population cannot be divided into
materialists and non-materialists. Instead, materialism is a continuum ranging from low to high,
and there may be no such thing as a non-materialist. People recognize that goods have value and
PT
can be used to improve quality of life. The difference between those low and high in materialism
RI
is a matter of degree, with high materialists viewing material goods as an important, and often
the best, way to achieve goals, whether it be to impress a member of the opposite sex or to have
SC
fun on a weekend. Low materialists, on the other hand, rely primarily on other means to meet
NU
needs, such as spending time with others, learning new skills, or developing a hobby.
Valkenburg, 2003; Chaplin & John, 2010; Flouri, 1999; Goldberg, Gorn, Peracchio, & Bamossy,
D
TE
2003), research has ruled out the possibility that this relationship has a genetic basis (Giddens,
Schermer, & Vernon, 2009; Renner et al., 2012). If not inherited, then material values must be
P
learned. Moschis (2007) has described the importance of examining events in the life course to
CE
understand how materialism is learned, but investigations into the association between childhood
AC
circumstances and materialism have been scattered and equivocal. This paper provides a
Following this, the paper presents a second framework that examines how materialism, once
Childhood is dominated by the need and desire to learn. Learning takes place
continuously each day, and the cumulative result of many small daily events is a set of skills that
enable a child to pursue a successful life within society: the ability to walk, talk, and read; how to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
interact with peers and adults; how to ride a bike and how to dress for a prom. The processes of
mastering such skills have been referred to as developmental tasks (Havighurst, 1972). Two such
tasks are especially relevant to the development of materialism: creating a secure personal
PT
identity and developing satisfactory peer relationships. Both tasks become especially salient
RI
during the middle school years (Erikson, 1963). Indeed, to parents, these tasks often seem to be
all-consuming at this age, with other developmental tasks and life responsibilities subservient to
SC
these two.
NU
Mastery of developmental tasks is gradual and incremental, and gaining a satisfactory
personal identity and learning how to effectively interact with peers are the cumulative result of
MA
countless small daily events. The interplay of daily events, key developmental tasks, and
materialism-related outcomes is shown in broad outline in Figure 1 and in greater detail in Figure
D
TE
2. Because the middle school years are the key period of identity development and the period in
which materialism in children increases (Chaplin & John, 2007), the model shown in these
P
A child’s life is filled with small daily events: lunch in the school cafeteria, soccer
practice, a math test, playing videogames with a friend, watching television, and the like.
Successful management of each event requires the use of specific skills or resources on the part
of the child. For example, playing soccer requires some athletic ability, emotional control, and
various social and communication skills. Success on a math test requires intellectual ability, self-
Each child has his/her own unique assortment of resources. One child may be good at
math and tennis and have great social skills, but falter in art class. Another child may have a
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
wicked sense of humor, own cool electronic devices, and know everything about the popular
music scene. It is useful, for our purposes, to divide these resources into two categories:
intangible resources, such as intelligence, wit, athletic skill, and social skills; and tangible
PT
resources that include clothes, possessions, and money.
RI
When managing an event, the child can choose from this assortment of resources. In most
cases, as suggested by drive theory (Hull, 1943; Spence, 1956), the child will utilize the
SC
resources that are most readily available or best learned. For example, in a lunchroom interaction,
NU
a child might pull a prank on friends or might start a conversation about a new videogame. If the
child isn’t confident in his ability to pull off a successful prank but is knowledgeable about
MA
gaming, he most likely will choose the conversation option. Consistent with social facilitation
theory (Zajonc, 1965), this reliance on the most readily available resource is especially likely to
D
TE
In a child’s life, every daily event is a learning opportunity. Each event has an outcome,
CE
and both positive and negative outcomes have learning value. Most immediately, the child learns
AC
which strategies and resource applications work well and which do not. For example, telling fart
jokes to friends in middle school usually has a favorable outcome, while complaining about an
earache does not. In addition, event outcomes teach the child which types of daily events she
excels at and which result in failure, and are thus to be avoided. This can lead to role
specialization, in which the child begins to avoid anything athletic (if one is often picked last in
P.E. team formation) or seeks out shopping activities (if one’s fashion sense is praised).
Eventually, one child may gradually acquire the role of science nerd, another becomes a jock,
and yet another becomes known as artsy. The accumulation of outcomes over time leads to self-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
One daily event outcome of critical importance for developing a sense of self is social
comparison. People in general, and middle school children especially, are engaged in a constant
PT
process of measuring themselves in comparison with others. Comparisons may be made with
RI
peers, with celebrities, or with fictional media characters (e.g., Chan & Prendergast, 2007;
Smolak & Stein, 2006). Because people have a bias toward making upward comparisons (Buunk
SC
& Gibbons, 2007), the outcome of these comparisons can be a sense of inferiority or deficiency.
NU
Such outcomes may also motivate children to study more in school, try harder at team workouts,
spend more time practicing the piano, or to acquire more cool clothing or gear so they can
MA
measure up to peers. Social comparisons will be examined in more detail in the discussion of the
reinforcement model. For purposes of the developmental model, suffice it to say that social
D
TE
comparison on tangible elements such as clothing and possessions can lead to envy (Levesque,
2011) and to increased emphasis on these items for developing a sense of self.
P
Children also learn from daily events that goods can be effective for developing and
CE
expressing their emerging identity. You can remind people that you’re good at soccer simply by
AC
wearing your soccer jersey to school. You can gain confidence in your appearance by wearing
the right brand of jeans or a popular line of cosmetics. You can be reassured in your identity as a
As noted above, children rely on resources that are readily available and in which they
have the most confidence when they manage daily events. Depending on their personal resource
assortment, some will rely heavily on intangible resources (skills, knowledge, etc.) to develop a
personal identity. Others, who might not be confident in their skills and other intangible
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
resources, or who have easy access to desirable possessions and clothing, will rely more on
tangible resources for identity development. For some, it may simply be easier to cultivate
tangible resources than intangible ones; after all, going shopping takes less self-discipline and
PT
provides more immediate payoff than practicing piano every day or taking golf lessons.
RI
However, relying on tangible resources for identity development has drawbacks because
it is likely to result in an identity that is less stable and less confidently held, for at least two
SC
reasons. First, intangible resources are essentially a part of one’s self, but tangible resources are
NU
external, and the link between these resources and the self is more tenuous. Second, the
meanings of tangible items such as clothing and possessions are constantly shifting. What’s cool
MA
one week may be passé the next, and fashion-forward items eventually become stale. Thus, a
person relying on things to define the self must continually research the meanings of goods and
D
replenish one’s personal stock with items that communicate the appropriate meaning—tasks that
TE
can have uncertain payoffs and that demand emotional, temporal, and monetary resources.
P
Accordingly, Figure 2 shows that identity task mastery processes are likely to result in an
CE
insecure, unstable self when the child relies heavily on things to develop identity. Evidence for
AC
this proposition comes from Gil, Kwon, Good, and Johnson (2012), who found that teens who
relied more on products to make a good impression were lower in self-concept clarity. Indirect
evidence is also provided by Rhee and Johnson (2012), who found that teens who used brands to
define their identity (i.e., their most favored brands were congruent with their ideal self rather
than with their actual self) were higher in materialism than other teens. As we will see in the next
section, an unstable self is one of the most consistently reported correlates of materialism.
A convincing body of evidence indicates that adult materialists do not have a firmly held
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
sense of self. Compared with others, materialists have more ambivalence in their sense of self-
worth (Frost, Kyrios, McCarthy, & Matthews, 2007), score lower on self-concept certainty
(Noguti & Bokeyar, 2014), have lower self-concept clarity (Gountas, Gountas, Reeves, & Moran,
PT
2012; Reeves, Baker, & Truluck, 2012; Watson, 2014), and have more self-doubt (Chang &
RI
Arkin, 2002; Christopher, Drummond, Jones, Marek, & Therriault, 2006; Rindfleisch, Burroughs,
& Wong, 2009). Materialistic adults also report higher levels of personal insecurity during
SC
childhood than other people do (Richins & Chaplin, 2015). Research among children and
NU
adolescents is more limited but points in the same direction. Children who are more susceptible
to peer influence can be said to have a less secure sense of self, and research consistently shows
MA
a strong relationship between this susceptibility and materialism among children (Dávila,
Casabayó, & Singh, 2017; Opree et al., 2011; Roberts, Manolis, & Tanner, 2008).
D
TE
The discussion so far has shown how the developmental task of identity creation is
shaped by daily events and the resources available to manage these events. We’ve also seen how
P
resource choices to manage this task can encourage the development of materialism. In the next
CE
middle school. Focal activities for the peer relationship task involve conversations and shared
activities, but concern about peers is present in almost every daily event a child this age
encounters (Parker, Rubin, Erath, Wojslawowicz, & Buskirk, 2006). To achieve satisfactory peer
relationships, a child must gain and sustain the attention of others, present him/herself in an
appealing way, and achieve the approval of peers. This must be done every day, and many times
throughout the day. The resource requirements to accomplish these outcomes are very high, and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
the situation is complicated by the fact that children this age do not yet have a well developed
As with identity mastery, children can use intangible and tangible resources to manage
PT
peer relationships. A child who doesn’t have strong social skills or isn’t good in sports can
RI
cement friendships with things—by talking about them, sharing possessions (clothes, gaming
systems), and shopping with friends (Mangleburg, Doney, & Bristol, 2004). The cumulative
SC
result of daily events involving peers is increasing competence in interpersonal skills and
NU
emerging mastery of the peer relationship developmental task.
Another cumulative result is a greater appreciation for the uses of goods in managing
MA
daily events. Children learn that possessions can be used to gain the attention of others, to
present the self in an appealing way, and to achieve approval and status. Incidentally, children
D
also come to realize that goods can be used to relieve boredom, have fun, and manage one’s
TE
mood. For example, shopping or viewing YouTube on a phone can be effective distractions if
P
one is bummed out about a bad test score or a social snub experienced earlier in the day.
CE
When children rely extensively on goods to master developmental tasks and manage
AC
daily events, a likely cumulative effect is the creation of transformation expectations about goods.
Transformation expectations are the belief that one’s life would be changed in a meaningful way
by the acquisition of a specific consumer good. Richins (2011) identified five categories of life
physical appearance, relationships with others, amount of pleasure experienced in life, and
efficacy in carrying out daily responsibilities. While transformation expectations have not been
studied among children, in adults the relationship between materialism and transformation
expectations has consistently been strong (Boonchoo & Thoumrungroje, 2017; Donnelly,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
The literature on children’s peer relationships provides some further insights into how
peers may shape a young person’s materialism, within the processes described above.
PT
Materialistic adolescents have materialistic friends (Chaplin & John, 2010; Sutton 2013),
RI
possibly because young people bond more readily with those who share their values.
Participation in daily events with materialistic friends can lead to mutual escalation as
SC
adolescents fuel each other’s materialistic tendencies when they discuss products, shop together,
NU
and compare acquisitions. Indeed, many studies have found that materialistic adolescents talk
about consumption with friends more often than do less materialistic teens (Churchill & Moschis,
MA
1979; Flouri, 1999; Weaver, Moschis, & Davis, 2011).
Peers also influence materialism through peer pressure. Adolescents can be cruel in
D
TE
enforcing material conformity (Wooten, 2006), and among young people, perceived peer
pressure to have the “right” kind of clothes and possessions is associated with materialism
P
(Banerjee & Dittmar, 2008). Facebook, Instagram, and similar social media are effective
CE
instruments of peer influence. These media send strong messages about the kinds of things one
AC
esteem, which in turn reduces the need to gain approval through acquisition and material
conformity (Chaplin & John, 2010; Gentina, Shrum, Lowrey, Vitell, & Rose, in press). By the
same token, peer rejection lowers self-esteem and appears to increase materialism among
adolescents (Banerjee & Dittmar, 2008; Jiang, Zhang, Ke, Hawk, & Qiu, 2015).
The discussion above described how key developmental tasks can be shaped by daily
events, and how materialism is influenced by these events and children’s use of resources to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
manage them. In the following sections, we examine two important environmental influences on
these processes: the larger cultural and economic environment in which these processes take
place, and the childhood family environment. These two factors influence the process in a
PT
pervasive way by affecting the daily events to which a child is exposed, the resources available
RI
to the child, and the manner in which developmental task mastery proceeds.
SC
It is widely believed that growing up in the midst of affluence in a capitalist culture leads
NU
to materialism (e.g., De Graaf, Wann, & Naylor, 2005; Easterlin, 2007; Kasser, Cohn, Kanner, &
Ryan, 2007). However, data to support this idea is difficult to come by. Because culture is
MA
pervasive and inescapable, within any one society it is difficult to assess culture’s effects on an
cultural institutions can provide insight into the relationship between culture and values.
of Western capitalist culture that has been studied in the context of materialism. More recent
CE
media innovations such as video streaming services (e.g., Netflix, Hulu) and online video
AC
(YouTube) have not been well studied in this context but are also likely to be relevant. If media
exposure influences material values, it is likely to do so by affecting one or more elements in the
The resource portfolio. Watching television and other media can affect a child’s resource
portfolio. Exposure to media can increase certain kinds of expertise, such as knowledge of
professional sports, entertainment news, and fashion trends, and this knowledge can be useful in
managing interpersonal relationships. Watching dramas and reality programming can give
children information about life (although some information may be inaccurate, unrealistic, or
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14
biased) and suggest strategies for managing developmental tasks (Hoffner & Buchanan, 2005).
While media exposure facilitates development of some skills, it can interfere with the
development of others. More time consuming media means less time available to develop
PT
athletic, intellectual, and artistic resources that a child could apply to developmental tasks.
RI
Task mastery and uses of goods. Media programming and advertising can suggest
SC
programming, media viewing may encourage children to rely on products for mastery of
NU
relationship and identity tasks. In addition, advertising commonly depicts product purchase as a
way to solve problems, and it almost always ascribes transformative powers to goods in an
MA
attempt to encourage people to buy. Extensive exposure to these kinds of messages may lead
young people, whose powers of critical thinking are still developing, to believe that purchase of
D
TE
specific products can be an effective way to deal with life problems and that product acquisition
can transform their lives in meaningful ways, beliefs that are indicative of materialism.
P
Insecure, unstable self. Some types of programming and advertising may encourage
CE
social comparison. Seeing the buff body of an athlete, the glossy hair on a model, or the cool
AC
clothes worn by participants in a reality show can make young people feel inferior about their
own appearance and possessions at a time when they are especially vulnerable to these kinds of
comparisons (Isaksen & Roper, 2008). These comparisons may lead to negative self-feelings
(Hargreaves & Tiggemann, 2004) and encourage materialistic behavior to repair those feelings,
through three mechanisms. The first is a low involvement learning effect (Hawkins, Hoch, &
Meyers-Levy, 2001). Most advertising and some programming directly promote materialistic
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15
values, and repeated exposure to these messages lends veracity to material values and makes
them appear acceptable and commonplace. Second, exposure to media may encourage
materialism by showcasing the use of goods by happy, attractive “people” and by implicitly (in
PT
programming) and explicitly (in advertising) demonstrating that these goods enhance happiness
RI
and quality of life. This can create transformation expectations and foster a materialistic mindset.
Third, repeated exposure to the idealized images of success and affluence that often occur in
SC
advertising and programming can upwardly shift children’s expectations about what is “normal”
NU
in terms of acquisition and possession. This shift in expectations can create dissatisfaction with
one’s own assortment of goods, leading to an increased emphasis on acquisition of things so one
MA
can achieve what seems to be a normal standard of living (Richins, 1995). In support of this idea,
research has shown that simply viewing images of luxury consumer goods increases one’s
D
TE
emphasis on material goals, as well as increasing the amount of anxiety and depressed affect
(e.g., sadness) a person feels (Bauer, Wilkie, Kim, & Bodenhausen, 2012).
P
The effects described in the paragraphs above suggest that television viewing and
CE
materialism would be positively correlated in children, and this has been confirmed empirically
AC
(e.g., Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2003; Chan & Prendergast, 2007; Opree, Buijzen, van Reijmersdal,
& Valkenburg, 2013). However, the observed relationships tend to be small (typically below .20).
One possible reason for these low correlations is that in measuring television exposure,
researchers have lumped together all forms of television programming. However, cartoons, teen
dramas, sports programming, and educational programs have very different content and are
Another possible explanation for low correlations is that simple correlation analysis
obscures the role of potential moderators in the relationship between viewing and materialism. In
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16
studies of adults, three moderators to this relationship have been identified. First, Richins (1987)
found that the correlation between materialism and television viewing was significant only for
those consumers who consider the people portrayed in television advertising to be typical of
PT
people in real life. Second, attention also seems to moderate the relationship between television
RI
viewing and materialism. Shrum, Burroughs, and Rindfleisch (2005) found that the relationship
between materialism and viewing was stronger for people who pay more attention to
SC
programming and who have a tendency to think deeply about things. Finally, Shrum, Lee,
NU
Burroughs, and Rindfleisch (2011) found that viewers who were transported (became absorbed
in the world of the media program, reacted emotionally, and had vivid thoughts) scored higher
MA
on materialism after viewing programming with a materialistic theme than did those who were
not transported. The role of such mediators have not been examined in studies of children’s
D
TE
television viewing.
The evidence shows that, among children, television viewing is associated with
P
materialism to some extent. However, these correlational studies cannot establish causation, and
CE
a plausible alternative explanation is that materialistic children simply choose to watch more
AC
television. Additional longitudinal studies and experimental research would be useful to better
understand whether and how television viewing and other media exposure foster materialism.
districts, and online stores, consumers have access to a tempting array of goods that can easily be
purchased even by those short on cash. It has been proposed that frequent exposure to these
environments of plentitude and easy access encourages the formation of materialistic values
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17
Unfortunately, empirical research has not tested this proposition. Although materialistic
adults shop more than less materialistic adults (Fitzmaurice & Comegys, 2006; Flynn, Goldsmith,
PT
& Pollitte, 2016; Segev, Shoham, & Gavish, 2015), only two studies have examined the
RI
relationship between childhood exposure to shopping environments and materialism. Goldberg et
al. (2003) found that children who spent more time in shopping environments were higher in
SC
materialism. The second study, using retrospective data, found materialism in adulthood to be
NU
associated with childhood exposure to shopping environments (Richins, 2017). However, it is
impossible to infer from these studies whether exposure to shopping environments creates
MA
materialism or, alternatively, that materialistic children’s love of things encourages them to shop
more often. In any event, exposure to shopping environments in which desirable goods can be
D
TE
touched and tried can create the illusion that these goods are attainable and encourage
materialistic imagining of what it would be like to own them, reinforcing materialistic tendencies.
P
Further, frequent shopping suggests that a child is relying heavily on goods to manage
CE
developmental tasks, which in turn places young people at risk of becoming materialistic.
AC
The family is the single most important socializing influence on a child’s development,
and family impacts in the developmental model are expected to be pervasive, affecting the daily
event cycle, task mastery processes, and a variety of outcomes. The literature on family
circumstances and parenting, as they relate to the model, are described below.
has been studied quite extensively in the context of materialism. In terms of the developmental
model, the family’s financial situation probably has its greatest impact on a child’s resource
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
assortment. It will affect whether the child is able to receive specialized training (e.g., music or
dance lessons, sports clinics) to develop important identity-defining intangible resources and
whether the child is able to participate in expensive peer oriented activities (e.g., summer camp).
PT
A higher family income also provides a child with a larger supply of tangible resources, making
RI
it easier for the child to rely heavily on things (e.g., branded clothing, electronic equipment) in
developmental task processes. There may be other effects as well, as when a child perceives that
SC
others have more than he/she does, resulting in feelings of inferiority and a desire to remove
NU
those feelings by acquiring more things (Zhang, Tian, Lei, Yu, & Liu, 2015).
disadvantaged childhoods were more likely to value financial success than those from more
D
TE
privileged households (see also Twenge & Kasser, 2013), and subsequent research has attempted
to determine whether this relationship extends to material values as well. Results are inconsistent,
P
with some studies showing a negative association between childhood economic resources and
CE
materialism (Chaplin, Hill, & John, 2014; Goldberg et al., 2003; Nairn, Bottomley, & Ormrod,
AC
2010), some showing a positive association (Baker, Moschis, Benmoyal-Bouzaglo, & dos Santos,
2013; Manchiraju & Son, 2014), and some no association (e.g., Grougiou & Moschis, 2015; Ku,
that has received attention from materialism scholars. Family disruption often creates financial
stressors that affect a child’s economic circumstances and can reduce the emotional support the
child receives. Burroughs and Rindfleisch (1997) proposed that children of disrupted families
develop materialistic values as a way of coping with these stressors and associated feelings of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19
insecurity. However, empirical evidence for this relationship is inconclusive, with some studies
finding that disruption is associated with materialism (Rindfleisch et al., 1997; Roberts, Tanner,
& Manolis, 2005) while others do not (Flouri, 1999, 2007; Roberts, Manolis, & Tanner, 2006).
PT
When the measure of family disruption is expanded to include other disruptive events such as
RI
parental absence, moving to a new place of residence, and physical abuse, results are also
inconclusive, with some studies showing a positive association between disruptive events and
SC
materialism (e.g., Rindfleisch et al., 1997; Weaver et al., 2011), while others find no relationship
NU
(e.g., Baker et al., 2013; Benmoyal-Bouzaglo & Moschis, 2010).
specific family circumstances do not matter nearly as much as how parents interact with their
D
TE
children within those circumstances. The next section examines some of these possible parental
influences on materialism.
P
Parental influences. Three parenting variables have been studied in the context of
CE
materialism. The first is whether parents use a socio-oriented communication style, in which
AC
parents emphasize deference to others and harmonious social relationships. This, in turn, may
foster materialism because children will learn to evaluate their purchases based on how others
perceive them (Moore & Moschis, 1981). This review found eight studies that examined the
relationship was not statistically significant (Benmoyal-Bouzaglo & Moschis, 2010; Flouri,
1999; Moore & Moschis, 1981). One study found a significant negative (rather than positive)
relationship (Grougiou & Moschis, 2015). The mean correlation in the remaining four studies
was .17 (Bristol & Mangleburg, 2005; Moschis & Moore, 1979; Moschis, Ong, Mathur,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
Yamashita, & Benmoyal- Bouzaglo, 2011; Weaver et al., 2011). Thus, it appears that socio-
oriented communication style has no direct bearing on children’s materialism, although it may
PT
Parental warmth is the second parenting variable that’s been studied. Although it has
RI
been proposed that warm, supportive parenting received during childhood will result in lower
materialism, the mechanisms for this have not been fully explicated. In the context of the
SC
developmental model, it is likely that children with supportive parents will be more likely to
NU
have a stable and secure sense of self (Chaplin & John, 2010), making them less susceptible to
materialistic impulses. It is also possible that warm and strong family ties can help children resist
MA
peers’ demands for material conformity.
In any event, evidence for the relationship between parental warmth and child’s
D
TE
between maternal nurturance and importance of financial success among teens. Similarly, two
P
studies found small negative associations between satisfaction with one’s mother and
CE
materialism (Flouri, 1999; Rindfleisch & Burroughs, 1999). On the other hand, four large data
AC
collections found significant positive relationships between perceived parental warmth during
childhood and materialism in adulthood (Richins & Chaplin, 2015; Richins, 2017). That is,
people whose parents were warm and supportive when they were children were more likely to be
materialistic as adults.
children (Richins & Chaplin, 2015)—is the third parenting variable of interest. Buying
something for a child who has made good grades, taking a toy away for hitting a sibling, or
buying a teen a cute t-shirt just because she wants it are examples of material parenting.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
21
between parental warmth and materialism found by Richins and Chaplin. Parents who are warm
and loving tend to engage in material parenting, both to show their affection and to shape their
PT
children’s behavior to prepare them for adulthood. The result of material parenting, however, can
RI
be a childhood saturated with consumer goods, providing plenty of tangible resources that
children can use in their management of daily events. These abundant resources increase the
SC
likelihood that children will rely on goods to shape their identities and manage their relationships,
NU
rather than relying on intangible resources such as personal skills for these ends. This reliance on
goods for such purposes is a central feature of materialism. And indeed, in studies that assessed
MA
material parenting, there were strong associations between material parenting received in
childhood and the success facet of materialism in adulthood (Richins & Chaplin, 2015; Richins,
D
TE
2017). Thus, this research suggests that parental warmth, rather than protecting against
However, the Richins and Chaplin research revealed additional complexities in the
CE
relationship between parenting and children’s materialism by also examining parental rejection
AC
(e.g., expressing disappointment in a child, spending little time with the child), a dimension of
parenting that is distinct from warmth (Rohner, 2004). Parental rejection was associated with
insecure feelings in childhood, which in turn was associated with the happiness facet of
materialism in adulthood. This is consistent Chaplin and John’s (2010) finding that children with
supportive parents have greater personal security (as measured by self-esteem) and place lower
The studies cited above indicate that at least two parenting practices are important
mechanisms by which children’s material values are socialized. Specifically, material parenting
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
22
appears to increase the likelihood a child will become materialistic by encouraging the child to
rely heavily on things during developmental task mastery. Second, parental rejection can create
feelings of insecurity that put the child at risk for materialism. Finally, although not addressed by
PT
research, it is also likely that children learn material values by observing their parents’ material
RI
values and behaviors and may come to emulate their way of acquiring and interacting with things.
SC
The developmental model describes how the daily events a child confronts, the resources
NU
that the child applies to manage events, and event outcomes shape the developmental tasks of
identity creation and mastery of peer relationships. It also describes how elements of the child’s
MA
environment and the child’s selective reliance on tangible resources for these developmental
tasks can foster conditions strongly associated with materialism, and possibly materialism itself.
D
While this process may continue throughout much of one’s life, the two developmental tasks at
TE
the center of the model are especially salient during the middle school years and give rise to a
P
“middle school logic” concerning goods, familiar to almost any parent of a child that age.
CE
People will like me better if I could have x (where x is usually a popular clothing or
AC
electronics item)
This syllogism embodies the essence of materialism: the belief that acquisition will help
one achieve important life goals (in this case, happiness, friendship, and positive self-feelings).
There is a kernel of truth in this material logic during the middle school years. Children can be
shunned or ridiculed for not having the right possessions. An important question, though, is
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
23
whether this syllogism is also true in adulthood. This question can be answered by examining
PT
Jackson, & Uzzell, 2010; Goldsmith, Flynn, & Clark, 2011), these activities don’t seem to result
RI
in increased happiness or well-being after purchase. Richins (2013) found that high materialism
consumers felt positive emotions when anticipating the purchase of a desired item and shopping
SC
for it, but then experienced a decline in positive emotions after purchase; low materialism
NU
consumers did not experience this hedonic decline. Similarly, Noguti and Bokeyar (2014) found
that materialistic consumers (compared to low materialists) were in a more positive mood before
MA
and while shopping, but after the purchase experienced more negative emotions. Other studies
have also found that materialists report more negative emotions after purchase (Fitzmaurice,
D
TE
Thus, evidence indicates that materialists are misguided in their beliefs that acquisition
P
will increase their happiness, and the middle school syllogism is not valid in adulthood. In fact,
CE
as young people gain maturity and are able to focus more on internal qualities rather than
AC
external signs to judge others and form friendships, many outgrow the materialistic way of
thinking. However, others do not. They continue to lead their lives and make acquisitions as if
the syllogism is true. The next section presents the second framework in this review and shows
of the materialism reinforcement model, outlined in broad form in Figure 3, begins with an
analysis of the personal qualities of materialists. The model proposes that several personal
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
24
qualities make materialists especially vulnerable to threats encountered in daily life. This
vulnerability leads to unpleasant psychological states that the materialist is motivated to reduce.
Although there are many ways to reduce these unpleasant states, because materialists have strong
PT
beliefs in the transformative powers of acquisition, they are more likely than others to manage
RI
the unpleasant psychological state by making a purchase. This purchase temporarily removes the
unpleasant psychological state and at the same time reinforces the belief in the transformative
SC
power of goods, and also reinforces materialistic beliefs and values.
NU
The materialism reinforcement model is described in detail below by analyzing one
personal quality associated with materialism—an insecure and unstable self-concept. This is
MA
followed by briefer discussions of how the model works with respect to two other personal
A notable characteristic of materialists is that they tend to be more insecure than other
P
people (Kasser, 2002). As described earlier, this characterization has been borne out in research
CE
showing that materialists (relative to others) tend to have an insecure, unstable sense of self,
AC
evidenced by ambivalence in their sense of self-worth, lower self-concept certainty and self-
A related notion, mentioned often in the literature, is that materialists have low self-
esteem. However, evidence for this assertion is mixed. In ten studies involving fourteen data
collections, five found no significant relationship between self-esteem and materialism; in the
remaining data collections, only two correlations exceeded -.20 in magnitude (Chang & Arkin,
2002; Flouri, 2007; Grougiou & Moschis, 2015; Kim, Callan, Gheorghiu, & Matthews, 2016;
Mick, 1996; Noguti & Bokeyar, 2014; Park & John, 2011; Reeves et al., 2012; Richins &
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
25
Dawson, 1992; Ruvio, Somer, & Rindfleisch, 2014). Weakness in the association between self-
esteem and materialism may stem from the inherent instability of self-concept among
materialists, which suggest that materialists’ self-esteem varies from day to day, or even moment
PT
to moment, depending on mood and daily events.
RI
Of greater interest for our purpose is self-esteem discrepancy—the inconsistency between
SC
Implicit Association Test). A person with high explicit but low implicit self-esteem is said to
NU
have fragile high self-esteem, which is easily threatened by daily events and requires strong
defenses to be maintained (Kernis & Paradise, 2002). People with higher self-esteem discrepancy
MA
are higher in materialism (Park & John, 2011). Materialists tend to have other self-discrepancies
as well, including discrepancies between their ideal and real selves (Carr & Vignoles, 2011;
D
TE
Dittmar, 2005). These discrepancies create psychological discomfort, which people are
motivated to alleviate by reducing the perceived discrepancy (Jordan, Spencer, Zanna, Hoshino-
P
Browne, & Correll, 2003) or by other means (Mandel, Rucker, Levav, & Galinsky, 2017).
CE
their self-concept is shaped and maintained by the goods they own (Shrum et al., 2013), and, as
described later in the section on interpersonal relationships, they care greatly what others think of
them. Even beliefs about ideal body shape are more externally determined for high (than for low)
the materialist especially vulnerable to daily events that threaten the self. Rocky performance in
a presentation, a social snub, or the realization that one can’t afford to buy as nice a car as a
disliked coworker can disrupt one’s self-view as a capable, well-liked, and successful person.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
26
These self-discrepancies may be shrugged off by someone with a strong sense of self but are not
so easily dismissed by one whose self-concept is less certain. Indeed, Greenier et al. (1999)
found that, at the end of a day, those with self-esteem instability felt worse about themselves in
PT
reaction to that day’s negative events than did those with more stable self-concepts. Similarly,
RI
Chang and Arkin (2002) observed that people chronically high in self-doubt are vulnerable to
events that heighten their feelings of uncertainty, while those low in self-doubt are more resilient.
SC
When the self is threatened (for example, by an unpleasant event or by reminders of a
NU
self-discrepancy), self-protective impulses come into play and the individual strives to restore the
sense of self that has been threatened or damaged. Extensive research in self-esteem maintenance
MA
shows that people handle identity threat by enhancing or affirming their identity, either in the
self-concept domain that was threatened or in some other, unrelated domain (Heine, Proulx, &
D
TE
Vohs, 2006). One way to restore self-concept after a threat is to acquire a product that bolsters
the threatened element of the self (Gao, Wheeler, & Shiv, 2009). More specifically in the context
P
of materialism, Dittmar and Bond (2010) found that reminding materialistic people of their self-
CE
discrepancies increased their desire to purchase products with high identity expressive potential.
AC
Threats to self and response. As shown in many studies, purchasing is a preferred way
for materialists to enhance or repair their identity. Dittmar and colleagues addressed identity
enhancement motivations for purchases in general (across products and brands) by assessing the
extent to which people buy things to make themselves feel more like their ideal self or to gain
prestige. They found strong associations between these identity-related motives and materialism
(Dittmar & Kapur, 2011; Dittmar, Long, & Bond, 2007; see also Donnelly et al., 2013). At the
brand level, people who incorporate brands into their sense of self and choose brands that
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
27
reinforce their identity are also higher than others in materialism (Flynn et al., 2016; Sprott,
The most direct evidence that materialists use products for identity purposes comes from
PT
research on transformation expectations, in which people report how their life would be changed
RI
by the purchase of a specific item. Materialists are noteworthy in the extent to which they believe
that a desired purchase would transform the self, both in terms of the way others would see the
SC
respondent and the respondent’s own self-perceptions (Richins, 2011, 2013).
NU
Responses to specific threats. Research has documented how people use goods to
respond to specific threats to the self. This section describes responses to powerlessness and
MA
social comparison threats. A third threat to self, social exclusion, is discussed in the section
below on interpersonal relationships. Power is the ability to influence other people and control
D
TE
valued resources in social relationships (Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, 2003). Materialists
value power more than others do, making it a more central component of their self-concept (e.g.,
P
Burroughs & Rindfleisch, 2002; Gatersleben et al., 2010; Pepper, Jackson, & Uzzell, 2009).
CE
However, daily events, such as having to give in to a spouse in an argument or wait for a friend
AC
who is chronically late, can create a sense of powerlessness. Two ways that people respond to
loss of power is to purchase utilitarian goods that enable them to exert more control over the
environment (Chen, Lee, & Yap, 2017), and to purchase high status goods, which in themselves
denote power (Lee & Shrum, 2012; Rucker, Galinsky, & Dubois, 2012). Materialists, who place
a high value on both power and acquisition, may be more likely to make such purchases in
response to powerlessness than others. Thus, we can see that small daily threats to power can
Social comparison can also threaten the self, and daily life provides many opportunities
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
28
to compare oneself with others. People compare themselves to those they know, to strangers, and
to actors and models in media. Social media comparisons have become ubiquitous and a constant
occurrence for many (Marder, Houghton, Joinson, Shankar, & Bull, 2016). These comparisons
PT
can affect a person’s self-views, at least temporarily. When people make upward comparisons
RI
with others who are superior, they feel deficient; when they compare with those less
SC
Self-concept instability is implicated in social comparison processes in two ways. Those
NU
who are less certain in their self-concept make more comparisons (Butzer & Kuiper, 2006), and
the self-views of those with unstable self-concepts are more likely to be influenced when social
MA
comparison occurs (Pelham & Wachsmuth, 1995). Materialists’ self-concept uncertainty
predisposes them to more frequent and more impactful social comparisons (Kim et al., 2016;
D
TE
Krekels & Pandelaere, 2015) and makes them especially vulnerable to daily social comparisons.
because they rely on goods to define the self, they may be especially vigilant about comparing
CE
possessions. Media contain many idealized images involving possessions, and friends on social
AC
media tend to manage their presentation of self in the most positive way possible (Hogan, 2010).
Accordingly, most social comparisons are upward (Richins, 1995). The result is self-discrepancy
that the materialist, with a less stable sense of self, will feel compelled to address. Mandel,
Petrova, and Cialdini (2006) found that social comparison with a similar but more successful
other increased study participants’ desire for luxury goods, and this enhanced desire for
Escapism. The responses to daily events and self-discrepancies described above involve
consumers actively trying to manage the damage incurred from threats. However, individuals
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
29
sometimes cannot actively manage the effects of a threat, or choose not to. In such situations,
they may turn to escapism, activities whose goal is to distract from self-discrepancies and that
are often hedonic in nature. Watching television, sports participation, and playing games with
PT
one’s children can all be forms of escape that distract from the unpleasantness of the day.
RI
Sometimes, escape involves shopping and buying. Because materialists are so strongly
focused on goods and their acquisition, they are more likely than others to engage in this form of
SC
escape. For example, a study of Israelis under threat from terrorist attack found that high
NU
materialists were more likely to engage in excessive purchasing than those lower in materialism
(Ruvio et al., 2014). Escape may also involve daydreaming or fantasizing about products, which
MA
materialists do more often than others (d’Astous & Deschênes, 2005; Fournier & Guiry, 1993).
Donnelly, Ksendzova, Howell, Vohs, and Baumeister (2016) compile convincing evidence that
D
TE
materialists are vulnerable to escape and explain how this can increase their probability of
than others to daily threats to the self. These threats create an unpleasant psychological state that
AC
Materialists, because of their strong belief in the transformative powers of goods, are more likely
than others to include product acquisition in their coping response to threats. These shopping
activities temporarily restore the self and remove the unpleasant psychological state. This in turn
reinforces belief in the transformative power of goods (because, indeed, acquisition did make the
person happier and did transform the self, at least for a time) and also reinforces materialistic
The above elaboration of the reinforcement model shows how an unstable, insecure self
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
30
involves the consumer in a cycle that perpetuates materialism. We now turn to another
PT
Insecure Interpersonal Relationships
RI
Materialists, on average, are more insecure in their interpersonal relationships than others.
They are higher in social anxiety (Chang & Arkin, 2002; Kashdan & Breen, 2007) and report
SC
having had higher levels of social insecurity during childhood (Richins & Chaplin, 2015). At the
NU
same time, for materialists, the judgments of other people matter. They score higher on measures
of need for social approval and fear of negative evaluation by others, and their personal identity
MA
is more dependent on others’ approval (Christopher & Schlenker, 2004; Rose & DeJesus, 2007).
Public self-consciousness—the extent to which people are concerned about the public impression
D
TE
they make and how others judge them—is higher among materialists (Richins & Dawson, 1990;
Rindfleisch et al., 2009; Xu, 2008). They also are more concerned with appearing successful and
P
physically attractive to others (Netemeyer, Burton, & Lichtenstein, 1995). These concerns lead
CE
materialists to pay close attention to other people and their reactions, manifest in a higher social
AC
comparison tendency (Krekels & Pandelaere, 2015). Materialists are also heavier users of social
media and use their smart phones often throughout the day (Kamal, Chu, & Pedram, 2013;
Roberts & Pirog, 2013; Wallace, Buil, de Chernatony, & Hogan, 2014), providing themselves
Perhaps because of their social insecurity, materialists tend to modify their behavior to
suit others. They score higher on measures of conformity, susceptibility to social influence, and
self-monitoring—the tendency to adapt one’s behaviors to fit a social situation (Chatterjee &
Hunt, 1996; Lastovicka, Bettancourt, Hughner, & Kuntze, 1999; Richins & Dawson, 1990;
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
31
Saunders & Munro, 2000). They also actively manage how they appear to others, using a variety
of tactics to tailor their self-presentation (Christopher, Lasane, Troisi, & Park, 2007; Christopher,
PT
Despite materialists’ concerns about what others think of them, their interpersonal ties
RI
tend to be weaker. Relationship quality is lower for materialists (compared to others) when
relationship quality is evaluated by friends and family members (Solberg, Diener, & Robinson,
SC
2004). On average, they are lonelier than others (Gentina, Shrum, & Lowrey, in press; Pieters,
NU
2013) and feel more insecure about the relationships that they do have (Norris, Lambert, DeWall,
& Fincham, 2012; Rindfleisch et al., 2009). They have lower quality marital relationships and
MA
less stable marriages (Carroll, Dean, Call, & Busby, 2011) and are more likely to report that their
family obligations interfere with their work (Promislo, Deckop, Giacalone, & Jurkiewicz, 2010).
D
Materialists’ interpersonal ties may be weaker, in part, because some of their personal
TE
qualities make it difficult for them to develop and sustain close relationships. They score higher
P
than others on a “dark triad” of socially aversive personality traits: Machiavellianism, narcissism,
CE
and subclinical psychopathy (which includes low empathy) (e.g., Krekels & Pandelaere, 2015;
AC
Pilch & Górnik-Durose, 2016; Zerach, 2016). People scoring high on this triad are characterized
as manipulative and selfish and use an array of influence tactics to manipulate others for personal
gain (Jonason & Webster, 2012). Materialists also tend to be competitive (Stewart & Stewart,
2006) and prefer relationships in which they can dominate others (Kim & Kramer, 2015; Watson,
2016). They are higher in envy and nongenerosity, both of which can undermine relationships
(Krekels & Pandelaere, 2015; Richins & Dawson, 1992), and the conspicuous consumption
displays that many materialists engage in can alienate others (Shrum et al., 2014).
The social insecurity and weaker interpersonal ties of materialists, combined with their
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
32
sensitivity to other people’s reactions to them, make them especially vigilant and vulnerable to
daily events and threats involving social relationships. Worry about the impression they make on
others, about fitting in, and whether they are being socially excluded or overlooked can take a
PT
psychological toll and result in unpleasant psychological states that can be alleviated by
RI
acquiring high status or socially approved products. For example, before buying, materialists
want to know what others think about the brand and whether the purchase will make a good
SC
impression (Fitzmaurice & Comegys, 2006; Lastovicka et al., 1999; Podoshen & Andrzejewski,
NU
2012). They also use purchasing as a way to be closer to others and gain acceptance (Rose &
DeJesus, 2007), and they expect the purchase of desirable products to transform the way they are
MA
viewed by others (Richins 2011).
Materialists also use goods to manage social exclusion. Exclusion, whether intentional or
D
TE
accidental, encourages people to turn to products in an effort to forge connection with the group
from which one has been excluded or to be noticed by group members (Lee & Shrum, 2012).
P
Materialists, with their belief that acquisition will improve their relationships with others and the
CE
regard in which they are held (Richins, 2011, 2013), may be more likely than others to acquire
AC
materialists sensitive to daily events in which they perceive they have fallen short of goals for
fitting in, making a favorable impression, and social inclusion. These perceived failures result in
an unpleasant psychological state that must be managed. For materialists—who believe that
acquisition can improve their social relationships and the way they are viewed by others—
acquiring goods that enhance social standing can be a preferred coping mechanism. To the extent
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
33
they use purchasing in such situations and believe their purchases have been successful,
Dispositional Unhappiness
PT
The third personal quality to be discussed in terms of the reinforcement model is
RI
dispositional unhappiness. The negative relationship between materialism and well-being has
attracted considerable attention from scholars, due in part, perhaps, to the irony that those who
SC
pursue the acquisition of goods as the route to happiness are, after all, less happy than those who
NU
do not. Materialists (compared to others) report more symptoms of depression (Claes et al.,
2010; Segev et al., 2015), have higher levels of anxiety (Otero-López & Villardefrancos, 2013a;
MA
Saunders & Munro, 2000), and experience more negative affect (Christopher, Saliba, &
Deadmarsh, 2009; Solberg et al., 2004). They tend to report lower life satisfaction overall and in
D
TE
specific life domains (e.g., La Barbera & Gürhan, 1997; Roberts & Clement, 2007). In short,
A meta-analysis by Dittmar, Bond, Hurst, and Kasser (2014) identified 102 samples in
CE
studies that assessed the correlation between material values and personal well-being (aggregate
AC
n = 31,844). The resulting average correlation was -.19. This meta-analysis shows that the
negative association between materialism and well-being is a robust one, but it is relatively weak,
Although the evidence for a negative relationship between materialism and well-being is
consistent, the nature of this relationship is not well understood. It is possible that materialism
causes lower well-being, possibly because materialistic preoccupations can divert people from
investing in the things most essential for happiness (Kasser, 2002). Alternatively, materialism
might not be the cause, but rather the result, of lower well-being. People who are unhappy may
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
34
focus on goods and their acquisition to reduce anxiety, enhance self-esteem, compensate for
possibility is that some other extraneous factor affects both well-being and materialism, creating
PT
a non-causal relationship between these two variables. Longitudinal studies provide evidence
RI
relevant to these three alternative explanations (Kasser et al., 2014; Opree et al., 2013; Pieters,
2013). This evidence is well-covered by Shrum et al. (2014), who conclude that the findings are
SC
mixed and that a bi-directional model may best explain the relationship. That is, materialism may
NU
decrease well-being, while at the same time lower well-being encourages materialistic pursuits.
to be lower in emotional stability (e.g., Donnelly, Iyer, & Howell, 2012; Mowen & Spears, 1999;
D
TE
Otero-López & Villardefrancos, 2013b). The greater fluidity of their emotional states, combined
with a predisposition to be less happy in the first place, is likely to make materialists more
P
emotionally responsive (vulnerable) to daily events and more prone to experiencing negative
CE
affect as a result. Because materialists believe that acquisition increases happiness, they are more
AC
likely than others to turn to acquisition as a way to remove this negative affect.
Two lines of research indicate that materialists do indeed use shopping for mood
regulation and repair. First, studies show that materialists are more likely to report that buying
things puts them in a better mood and that shopping is fun and exciting (e.g., Dittmar & Kapur,
2011; Dittmar et al., 2007; Donnelly et al., 2013). However, it’s impossible to conclude from
these studies that mood management is actually a motivation for buying, as none of these studies
asked if changing one’s mood is the goal of a purchase. Other research (Somer & Ruvio, 2014)
found that materialists are more likely to go shopping to escape into a different world or to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
35
Studies of self-gifts provide more direct support for the idea that materialists buy things
for mood enhancement. McKeage (1992) asked people how likely they would be to give
PT
themselves a self-gift in each of several hypothetical situations. The association between self-
RI
gifting likelihood and materialism was highest for the situation in which the respondent was
feeling depressed. In a later study that examined actual past self-gift behavior, materialists
SC
(compared to others) were more likely to report that they had given themselves gifts to cheer
NU
themselves up (McKeage, Richins, & Debevec, 1993). Taken together, these two lines of
research lend credence to the idea that mood regulation is an important buying motivation for
MA
materialists. To the extent these mood regulation efforts are successful, they will reinforce belief
in the transformative power of goods and confirm materialistic values and tendencies.
D
TE
The preceding discussion illustrates how the reinforcement model of materialism can
unhappiness increases vulnerability to daily events, creating unpleasant affective states that
CE
materialistic people are inclined to manage by product acquisition. These purchases temporarily
AC
lift the buyer’s mood, confirming belief in the transformational properties of goods and
The reinforcement model in Figure 3 describes processes that perpetuate materialism and
belief in the transformative powers of things. It also sheds light on two behaviors associated with
Many studies show that materialists are more likely than others to buy impulsively (e.g.,
Mick, 1996; Podoshen & Andrzejewski, 2012; Ruvio et al., 2014). Materialists also tend to be
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
36
more impulsive generally (Pirog & Roberts, 2007; Roberts & Pirog, 2013; Rose, 2007). Their
impulsive buying, however, is somewhat selective: materialists who experience a deficit in self-
identity don’t want to delay acquisition of goods that help them address this deficit, but do not
PT
exhibit the same impatience to acquire other goods (Dittmar & Bond, 2010). Given that
RI
materialists use acquisition to manage unpleasant psychological states that arise during daily life,
it makes sense that they are higher in impulsive purchasing. These unpleasant states arise on an
SC
unplanned but possibly frequent basis and can be quite aversive, demanding immediate attention,
NU
so acquisition to relieve these unpleasant states will also be unplanned.
For some materialists, impulsive tendencies get out of control and buying becomes a
MA
compulsion. Dozens of studies have documented the relationship between materialism and
compulsive buying, and some have attempted to understand the processes that mediate this
D
TE
relationship. A detailed analysis of this literature is beyond the scope of this article, but notable
studies include Desarbo and Edwards (1995), Dittmar et al. (2007), and Ruvio et al. (2014).
P
Another outcome of the perpetuation process relates to how materialists use money. First,
CE
they are less satisfied with their income or standard of living (Christopher, Marek, & Carroll,
AC
2004; Roberts & Clement, 2007), despite the fact that household income is equivalent for low
and high materialism consumers. To the extent that materialists use acquisitions to enhance and
display their self-concepts and to manage unpleasant psychological states, it seems reasonable
With respect to the money that they do have, materialists tend to be present-focused,
rather than future-oriented (Nye & Hillyard, 2013). Accordingly, they tend to spend their money
quickly (Garðarsdóttir & Dittmar, 2012; Watson, 2003) and are less frugal (Lastovicka et al.,
1999; Pepper et al., 2009; Troisi, Christopher, & Marek, 2006). Materialists also report more
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
37
difficulty in controlling their spending (Rick, Cryder, & Loewenstein, 2008) and tend to misuse
credit more than other consumers (Pirog & Roberts, 2007; Richins, 2011; Watson, 2003).
Two explanations suggest why materialists might have more problems than others in
PT
managing their credit (and with impulsive purchasing, as well). First, when a person is sad,
RI
willingness to pay a high price for a desired item increases (e.g., Lerner, Small, & Loewenstein,
2004). This is particularly true when the purchaser is self-focused during the shopping
SC
experience (Cryder, Lerner, Gross, & Dahl, 2008), which is likely to be the case when someone
NU
is smarting from an untoward event earlier in the day. Second, Kim (2013) has shown that in
making decisions, concrete thoughts (e.g., how much happier one would feel by making a
MA
purchase) tend to crowd out or overwhelm more abstract or distant ones (such as the importance
of saving money), which can lead to self-control failure. An interesting result of Kim’s study is
D
TE
that self-control failure occurred only for study participants who had an extrinsic goals
orientation, which is correlated with materialism (e.g., Elphinstone & Critchley, 2016).
P
Summarizing, the more materialistic one is, the more vulnerable a person will be to daily
CE
events, and the more likely it is that the individual will have a self-control failure resulting in
AC
General Discussion
Reducing Materialism
Because of its negative correlates and outcomes, there is considerable interest in ways to
reduce a person’s materialism. The two frameworks presented in this paper provide insight into
provides insights into how materialism might be prevented from developing in the first place.
Because the processes described in this model occur during childhood, parents are the most
effective intervention agents. The most obvious place for parents to have an impact on
PT
materialism is in the resources component of the daily event cycle. To the extent that parents
foster development of intangible resources and limit a child’s access to tangible resources, they
RI
will help their child learn to rely on intangible resources when managing daily events. Over time,
SC
this will help the child develop a more secure sense of self that will reduce the inclination to rely
NU
on things to create self-identity and manage peer relationships. Where parents are unable to
provide support for resource development due to low income or difficult work schedules, schools
MA
can step in and offer after-school programs that focus on intangible resource development.
Another way that parents can intervene in the daily event cycle is to influence, to the
D
TE
extent possible, the daily events in which a child participates. Encouraging participation in
events that boost the child’s confidence in his/her intangible resources and that don’t rely on
P
tangible resources for success will help a child learn to use his/her resource assortment in a way
CE
Third, parents can sometimes help children interpret the outcomes of daily events in non-
materialistic ways. It’s natural for a child to feel inferior after being teased for wearing the wrong
brand of sneakers, but a parent can offer alternative viewpoints, such as explaining that some
kids tease because they aren’t self-confident and are being mean just to make themselves feel
better. This probably won’t stop a child from wanting new sneakers, but the cumulative impact
of these explanations can provide the child with a greater understanding of peers’ motivations
and limitations and enable them to put social interactions into a broader context.
Fourth, parents can decrease a child’s chance of being materialistic, and increase the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
39
likelihood of many positive life outcomes, through supportive parenting. Children of supportive
parents have a stronger sense of self and are lower in materialism (Chaplin & John, 2010).
Finally, parents can influence children’s values by how they themselves interact with
PT
products. Children learn values in part by observing their parents’ values in action (Parke &
RI
Buriel, 2008). A parent who manages his mood by buying a gadget, or who buys a new dress to
impress a rival at work, teaches the child to believe that acquisition has transformative power.
SC
Although most adults do these things occasionally, consistently relying on acquisition in these
NU
ways encourages a materialistic mindset in children.
place. However, the reinforcement model in Figure 3 suggests two points at which the cycle that
D
TE
perpetuates materialism might be broken, or at least slowed down. The first point of intervention
would be to reduce one’s vulnerability to daily threats. Thus, developing a stronger and more
P
stable sense of self, improving the security of one’s interpersonal relationships, and finding ways
CE
to neutralize dispositional unhappiness would prevent the perpetuation cycle from being initiated.
AC
The second possibility is for a materialist to learn to deal with unpleasant psychological
states without relying on acquisition. This is a complex topic in its own right and worthy of
psychologists. Alternatively, simply learning to delay the purchase as long as possible after the
onset of the unpleasant affect might be helpful. If the delay is long enough, the negative affect
may dissipate on its own. Delay also increases the chance that the unhappy individual will
stumble upon an alternative coping strategy that doesn’t involve purchase. Giving up credit cards
Unfortunately, changing most adult behaviors and values is not easily accomplished, and
that is true for materialism as well. The psychological and behavioral changes required for the
interventions described above to be successful seem exceedingly difficult for individuals to make
PT
and may not be achievable for some people without lengthy counseling and extended practice.
RI
Future Research
This review and the proposed frameworks synthesize much of the literature on
SC
materialism and provide a broad framework for how materialism is created in children and
NU
perpetuated in adults. However, these broad frameworks encompass several component
processes, and the details concerning many of these components remain to be fleshed out by
MA
additional research. A few suggestions are provided below.
examined the correlation between materialism and such environmental variables as television
exposure and family circumstances, but results have been weak and sometimes equivocal. The
P
model, rather than looking only at the materialism outcome variable. As noted earlier, the model
suggests several points at which environmental and family factors have the potential to influence
these processes. In terms of media influences specifically, one improvement would be to use
finer grained analyses that look at the effects of exposure to specific programming or social
media content rather than treating media exposure in a monolithic way. Additional research on a
greater variety of parenting and family variables, beyond those previously studied, would also be
Research into the role of daily events in materialism processes is also needed, in the
context of both the developmental and the reinforcement models. There is a strong tradition of
experimental studies that manipulate simulated daily events or experiences among young adults
PT
(e.g., social exclusion, powerlessness). These types of experiments can help determine which
RI
types of daily events and which types of psychological states are most likely to result in
materialistic responses. Such experiments can also identify factors or interventions that might
SC
mitigate materialistic responses, such as the provision of emotional support from a peer,
NU
opportunities to reaffirm the self in non-materialistic ways, and distraction.
circumstances, resources applied to manage the event, event outcomes, affective and
D
TE
psychological states associated with outcomes (both positive or negative), and how the
respondent reacted to those states. This approach doesn’t require experimental manipulation and
P
thus may be especially useful in studying daily event effects among adolescents.
CE
A third area of needed work is further development of the two models described in this
AC
review. Although the models incorporate what’s known about materialism, there are no doubt
additional factors and processes to be discovered and integrated. A related area of inquiry would
present models address materialism in Western economically advanced countries. But given the
understanding of which of the processes and factors identified here are relevant in other countries,
and what additional processes may come into play, would be extremely useful.
Fourth, research is needed to identify and test interventions that reduce the chances of a
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
42
child developing materialistic values in the first place, and interventions that reduce materialism
or its negative effects in adulthood. As noted earlier, the two models provide insight into where
interventions are most likely to be effective and suggest what these interventions might look like.
PT
Additional ideas for interventions, and empirical tests of intervention effectiveness, would be
RI
useful in mitigating the negative effects of materialism on individuals and the environment.
SC
(2013) have suggested that experiences can be used in a materialistic way just as goods are: that
NU
is, some people consume experiences to define the self, judge success in life, and impress others.
This tendency has been termed experientialism by Smith and Lutz (1996). Young people’s
MA
sometimes excessive focus on display of their culinary, athletic, and travel experiences on social
media suggests that experientialism is becoming a defining force for many, with possibly some
D
TE
of the same negative correlates as materialism. Further research into this phenomenon is needed,
along with assessment of the extent to which the frameworks described in this review apply to
P
This review revealed hundreds of papers concerning materialism, but the majority of
AC
them reported basic correlational studies in which some independent variable was correlated with
materialism as the dependent variable. Fewer studies examined underlying processes that involve
materialism. One reason for this is the lack of a clear and detailed explication of the processes
that lead to materialism. While the two frameworks described in this paper are still works in
progress, it is hoped that they prove useful in stimulating more process oriented research that
References
Baker, A. M., Moschis, G. P., Benmoyal-Bouzaglo, S., & dos Santos, C. P. (2013). How family
PT
perspective. Cross-Cultural Research, 47(4), 335-362.
RI
Banerjee, R., & Dittmar, H. (2008). Individual differences in children's materialism: The role of
SC
Bauer, M. A., Wilkie, J. E., Kim, J. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Cuing consumerism:
NU
Situational materialism undermines personal and social well-being. Psychological Science,
23(5), 517-523.
MA
Belk, R. W. (1983). Worldly possessions: Issues and criticisms. In R. P. Bagozzi & A. M.
Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of
Belk, R.W. (1988). Third world consumer culture. In E. Kumcu & A.F. Firat (Eds.), Marketing
CE
and development: Toward broader dimensions (pp. 103-127). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
AC
Benmoyal-Bouzaglo, S., & Moschis, G. P. (2010). Effects of family structure and socialization
on materialism: A life course study in France. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,
18(1), 53-70.
Bristol, T., & Mangleburg, T. F. (2005). Not telling the whole story: Teen deception in
Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2003). The unintended effects of television advertising: A
Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (1997). Materialism as a coping mechanism: An inquiry into
PT
family disruption. In M. Brucks & D. J. MacInnis (Eds.), Advances in consumer research,
RI
24. (pp. 89-97).
Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values
SC
perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 348-370.
NU
Butzer, B., & Kuiper, N. A. (2006). Relationships between the frequency of social comparisons
Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Social comparison: The end of a theory and the
D
TE
21.
P
Carr, H. L., & Vignoles, V. L. (2011). Keeping up with the Joneses: Status projection as
CE
Carroll, J. S., Dean, L. R., Call, L. L., & Busby, D. M. (2011). Materialism and marriage: Couple
profiles of congruent and incongruent spouses. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy,
10(4), 287-308.
Chan, K., & Prendergast, G. (2007). Materialism and social comparison among adolescents.
Chang, L., & Arkin, R. M. (2002). Materialism as an attempt to cope with uncertainty.
Chaplin, L. N., Hill, R. P., & John, D. R. (2014). Poverty and materialism: A look at
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
45
impoverished versus affluent children. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 33(1), 78-92.
Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2007). Growing up in a material world: Age differences in
PT
Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2010). Interpersonal influences on adolescent materialism: A new
RI
look at the role of parents and peers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 176-184.
SC
An investigation of related cognitive orientation. Psychological Reports, 79(2), 523-528.
NU
Chen, C. Y., Lee, L., & Yap, A. J. (2017). Control deprivation motivates acquisition of utilitarian
about one’s own death, personal insecurity, and materialism. Personality and Individual
D
TE
Christopher, A. N., Lasane, T. P., Troisi, J. D., & Park, L. E. (2007). Materialism, defensive and
P
assertive self-presentational tactics, and life satisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical
CE
Christopher, A. N., Marek, P., & Carroll, S. M. (2004). Materialism and attitudes toward money:
Christopher, A. N., Morgan, R. D., Marek, P., Keller, M., & Drummond, K. (2005). Materialism
Christopher, A. N., Saliba, L., & Deadmarsh, E. J. (2009). Materialism and well-being: The
mediating effect of locus of control. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(7), 682-
686.
Christopher, A. N., and B. R. Schlenker. (2004). Materialism and affect: The role of self-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
46
Churchill, G. A., & Moschis, G. P. (1979). Television and interpersonal influences on adolescent
PT
Claes, L., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Eynde, F., Mitchell, J. E., Faber, R., de Zwaan, M., & Mueller,
RI
A. (2010). Emotional reactivity and self-regulation in relation to compulsive buying.
SC
Cryder, C. E., Lerner, J. S., Gross, J. J., & Dahl, R. E. (2008). Misery is not miserly: Sad and
NU
self-focused individuals spend more. Psychological Science, 19(6), 525-530.
d'Astous, A., & Deschênes, J. (2005). Consuming in one's mind: An exploration. Psychology &
MA
Marketing, 22(1), 1-30.
Dávila, J.F., Casabayó, M., & Singh, J.J. (2017). A world beyond family: How external factors
D
TE
impact the level of materialism in children. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51, 162-182.
De Graaf, J., Wann, D., & Naylor, T. H. (2005). Affluenza: The all-consuming epidemic. Berrett-
P
Koehler Publishers.
CE
262.
Dittmar, H., & Bond, R. (2010). I want it and I want it now: Using a temporal discounting
101(4), 751-776.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
47
Dittmar, H., Bond, R., Hurst, M., & Kasser, T. (2014). The relationship between materialism and
107(5), 879-924.
PT
Dittmar, H., & Kapur, P. (2011). Consumerism and well-being in India and the UK: Identity
RI
projection and emotion regulation as underlying psychological processes. Psychological
SC
Dittmar, H., Long, K., & Bond, R. (2007). When a better self is only a button click away:
NU
Associations between materialistic values, emotional and identity-related buying motives,
and compulsive buying tendency online. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(3),
MA
334-361.
Donnelly, G., Iyer, R., & Howell, R. T. (2012). The big five personality traits, material values,
D
TE
Donnelly, G., Ksendzova, M., & Howell, R. T. (2013). Sadness, identity, and plastic in over-
CE
shopping: The interplay of materialism, poor credit management, and emotional buying
AC
Donnelly, G. E., Ksendzova, M., Howell, R. T., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2016).
Buying to blunt negative feelings: Materialistic escape from the self. Review of General
Easterlin, R. A. (2007). The escalation of material goals: fingering the wrong culprit.
Elphinstone, B., & Critchley, C. (2016). Does the way you think and look at the world contribute
to being materialistic? Epistemic style, metaphysics, and their influence on materialism and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
48
Erikson, Erik H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
PT
25(6), 332-338.
RI
Fitzmaurice, J., & Comegys, C. (2006). Materialism and social consumption. Journal of
SC
Flouri, E. (1999). An integrated model of consumer materialism: Can economic socialization and
NU
maternal values predict materialistic attitudes in adolescents? The Journal of Socio-
fathers of secondary school age children. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(2), 167-176.
D
TE
Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pollitte, W. (2016). Materialism, status consumption, and
Fournier, S., & Guiry, M. (1993). "An emerald green Jaguar, a house on Nantucket, and an
CE
African safari”: Wish lists and consumption dreams in materialist society. In L. McAlister
AC
Fournier, S., & Richins, M. L. (1991). Some theoretical and popular notions concerning
Frost, R. O., Kyrios, M., McCarthy, K. D., & Matthews, Y. (2007). Self-ambivalence and
Gao, L., Wheeler, S. C., & Shiv, B. (2009). The “shaken self”: Product choices as a means of
Garðarsdóttir, Ragna B., & Dittmar, H. (2012). The relationship of materialism to debt and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
49
Gatersleben, B., White, E., Abrahamse, W., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Values and
PT
sustainable lifestyles. Architectural Science Review, 53(1), 37-50.
RI
Gentina, E., Shrum, L. J., & Lowrey, T. M. (in press). Coping with loneliness through
SC
of Business Ethics.
NU
Gentina, E., Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Vitell, S. J., & Rose, G. M. (in press). An integrative
model of the influence of parental and peer support on consumer ethical beliefs: The
MA
mediating role of self-esteem, power, and materialism. Journal of Business Ethics.
Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of Economic
D
TE
Giddens, J. L., Schermer, J. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2009). Material values are largely in the
P
Gil, L. A., Kwon, K. N., Good, L. K., & Johnson, L. W. (2012). Impact of self on attitudes
toward luxury brands among teens. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1425-1433.
Goldberg, M. E., Gorn, G. J., Peracchio, L. A., & Bamossy, G. (2003). Understanding
Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R., & Clark, R. A. (2011). Materialism and brand engagement as
Gountas, J., Gountas, S., Reeves, R. A., & Moran, L. (2012). Desire for fame: Scale development
and association with personal goals and aspirations. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 680-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
50
689.
Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., McNamara, C. W., Waschull, S. B., Berry, A. J., Herlocker, C.
E., & Abend, T. A. (1999). Individual differences in reactivity to daily events: Examining
PT
the roles of stability and level of self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 187-208.
RI
Grougiou, V., & Moschis, G. P. (2015). Antecedents of young adults' materialistic values.
SC
Guðnadóttir, U., & Garðarsdóttir, R. B. (2014). The influence of materialism and ideal body
NU
internalization on body-dissatisfaction and body-shaping behaviors of young men and
women: Support for the consumer culture impact model. Scandinavian Journal of
MA
Psychology, 55(2), 151-159.
Hargreaves, D. A., & Tiggemann, M. (2004). Idealized media images and adolescent body
D
Havighurst, Robert J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York: David
P
McKay Company.
CE
Hawkins, S. A., Hoch, S. J., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2001). Low-involvement learning: Repetition
AC
and coherence in familiarity and belief. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 1-11.
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the
coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88-110.
Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults' wishful identification with television
characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology,
7(4), 325-351.
Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing
performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30 (6),
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
51
377-386.
Isaksen, K. J., & Roper, S. (2008). The impact of branding on low-income adolescents: A vicious
PT
cycle?. Psychology & Marketing, 25(11), 1063-1087.
RI
Jiang, J., Zhang, Y., Ke, Y., Hawk, S. T., & Qiu, H. (2015). Can't buy me friendship? Peer
SC
Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 48-55.
NU
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark triad
personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4),
MA
521-526.
Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Hoshino-Browne, E., & Correll, J. (2003). Secure and
D
TE
defensive high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 969.
Kamal, S., Chu, S. C., & Pedram, M. (2013). Materialism, attitudes, and social media usage and
P
their impact on purchase intention of luxury fashion goods among American and Arab
CE
Kashdan, T. B., & Breen, W. E. (2007). Materialism and diminished well-being: Experiential
521-539.
Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate
18(1), 1-22.
Kasser, T., Rosenblum, K. L., Samcroff, A. J., Deci, E. L., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M. ... Hawks,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
52
three longitudinal studies and an intervention experiment. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1),
1-22.
PT
Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Zax, M., & Sameroff, A. J. (1995). The relations of maternal and social
RI
environments to late adolescents' materialistic and prosocial values. Developmental
SC
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition.
NU
Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284.
Kernis, M. H., & Paradise, A. W. (2002). Distinguishing between fragile and secure forms of
MA
high self-esteem. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination
Kim, H. C. (2013). Situational materialism: How entering lotteries may undermine self-control.
Kim, H. C., & Kramer, T. (2015). Do materialists prefer the “brand-as-servant”? The interactive
CE
Kim, H., Callan, M. J., Gheorghiu, A. I., & Matthews, W. J. (2016). Social comparison, personal
relative deprivation, and materialism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 373-392.
Krekels, G., & Pandelaere, M. (2015). Dispositional greed. Personality and Individual
Ku, L., Dittmar, H., & Banerjee, R. (2012). Are materialistic teenagers less motivated to learn?
Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the United Kingdom and Hong Kong.
La Barbera, P. A., & Gürhan, Z. (1997). The role of materialism, religiosity, and demographics
Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Hughner, R. S., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the
PT
tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85-98.
RI
Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response
SC
530-544.
NU
Lerner, J.S., Small, D.A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover
Manchiraju, S., and J. Son. (2014). Materialistic (and unhappy?) adult now, economically
deprived child then: How are felt formative economic deprivation, materialism, and well-
P
Mandel, N., Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Images of success and the preference for
AC
Mandel, N., Rucker, D., Levav, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). The compensatory consumer
Mangleburg, T. F., Doney, P. M., & Bristol, T. (2004). Shopping with friends and teens’
Marder, B., Houghton, D., Joinson, A., Shankar, A., & Bull, E. (2016). Understanding the
PT
materialism (pp. 140-146). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
RI
McKeage, K. K., Richins, M. L., & Debevec, K. (1993). Self-gifts and the manifestation of
SC
research, 20. (pp. 359-364).
NU
Mick, D. G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirable
Moschis, G. P. (2007). Life course perspectives on consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy
Moschis, G. P., & Moore, R. L. (1979). Family communication and consumer socialization. In
CE
Moschis, G., Ong, S. F., Mathur, A., Yamashita, T., & Benmoyal-Bouzaglo, S. (2011). Family
Mowen, J. C., & Spears, N. (1999). Understanding compulsive buying among college students:
Nairn, A., Bottomley, P., & Ormrod, J. (2010). “Those who have less want more. But does it
Buckingham & V. Tingstad (Eds.), Childhood and consumer culture (pp. 194-208).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
55
Palgrave Macmillan.
Netemeyer, R.G., Burton, S., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1995). Trait aspects of vanity: Measurement
PT
Noguti, V., & Bokeyar, A. L. (2014). Who am I? The relationship between self‐ concept
RI
uncertainty and materialism. International Journal of Psychology, 49(5), 323-333.
Norris, J. I., Lambert, N. M., DeWall, C. N., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Can’t buy me love?:
SC
Anxious attachment and materialistic values. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5),
NU
666-669.
Nye, P., & Hillyard, C. (2013). Personal financial behavior: The influence of quantitative literacy
MA
and material values. Numeracy, 6(1), 1-24.
Opree, S. J., Buijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). Development and
D
TE
validation of the Material Values Scale for children (MVS-c). Personality and Individual
Opree, S. J., Buijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2013). Children’s
CE
Otero-López, J. M., & Villardefrancos, E. (2013a). Materialism and addictive buying in women:
The mediating role of anxiety and depression. Psychological Reports, 113, 328-344.
Park, J. K., & John, D. R. (2011). More than meets the eye: The influence of implicit and explicit
Parke, R. D., & Buriel, R. (2008). Socialization in the family: Ethnic and ecological perspectives.
In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent development (pp. 95-138).
PT
Parker, J. G., Rubin, K. H., Erath, S. A., Wojslawowicz, J.C., & Buskirk, A. A. (2006). Peer
RI
relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology
SC
Pelham, B. W., & Wachsmuth, J. O. (1995). The waxing and waning of the social self:
NU
Assimilation and contrast in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social
Pieters, R. (2013). Bidirectional dynamics of materialism and loneliness: Not just a vicious
P
Pilch, I., & Górnik-Durose, M. E. (2016). Do we need “dark” traits to explain materialism? The
AC
incremental validity of the dark triad over the HEXACO domains in predicting
Pirog, S. F., & Roberts, J. A. (2007). Personality and credit card misuse among college students:
The mediating role of impulsiveness. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 65-
77.
Promislo, M. D., Deckop, J. R., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2010). Valuing money
PT
more than people: The effects of materialism on work–family conflict. Journal of
RI
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 935-953.
Reeves, R. A., Baker, G. A., & Truluck, C. S. (2012). Celebrity worship, materialism,
SC
compulsive buying, and the empty self. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 674-679.
NU
Renner, W., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., Spinath, F. M., &
89-93.
D
TE
Rhee, J., & Johnson, K. K. (2012). Predicting adolescents' apparel brand preferences. Journal of
Working paper.
Richins, M. L., & Chaplin, L. N. (2015). Material parenting: How the use of goods in parenting
fosters materialism in the next generation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1333-
PT
1357.
RI
Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1990). Measuring material values: A preliminary report of scale
SC
research, 17. (pp. 169-175).
NU
Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its
Richins, M. L., McKeage, K. K., & Najjar, D. (1992). An exploration of materialism and
D
TE
Rick, S. I., Cryder, C. E., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Tightwads and spendthrifts. Journal of
CE
Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (1999). Materialism and childhood satisfaction: A social
Rindfleisch, A., Burroughs, J. E., & Denton, F. (1997). Family structure, materialism, and
Rindfleisch, A., Burroughs, J. E., & Wong, N. (2009). The safety of objects: Materialism,
existential insecurity, and brand connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 1-16.
Roberts, J. A., & Clement, A. (2007). Materialism and satisfaction with over-all quality of life
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
59
Roberts, J. A., Manolis, C., & Tanner, J. F. J. (2006). Adolescent autonomy and the impact of
family structure on materialism and compulsive buying. Journal of Marketing Theory and
PT
Practice, 14(4), 301-314.
RI
Roberts, J. A., Manolis, C., & Tanner Jr, J. F. (2008). Interpersonal influence and adolescent
SC
Roberts, J. A., & Pirog, S. F. (2013). A preliminary investigation of materialism and
NU
impulsiveness as predictors of technological addictions among young adults. Journal of
Rose, P. (2007). Mediators of the association between narcissism and compulsive buying: The
CE
roles of materialism and impulse control. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(4), 576-
AC
581.
Rose, P., & DeJesus, S. P. (2007). A model of motivated cognition to account for the link
Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A.D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power
shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 352-368.
Rudmin, F. W., & Kilbourne, W. E. (1996). The meaning and morality of voluntary simplicity:
Ruvio, A., Somer, E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2014). When bad gets worse: The amplifying effect of
PT
Marketing Science, 42(1), 90-101.
RI
Saunders, S., & Munro, D. (2000). The construction and validation of a consumer orientation
SC
Australia. Social Behavior and Personality, 28(3), 219-240.
NU
Segev, S., Shoham, A., & Gavish, Y. (2015). A closer look into the materialism construct: The
antecedents and consequences of materialism and its three facets. Journal of Consumer
MA
Marketing, 32(2), 85-98.
Shrum, L. J., Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2005). Television's cultivation of material
D
TE
Shrum, L. J., Lee, J., Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2011). An online process model of
P
Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Pandelaere, M., Ruvio, A. A., Gentina, E., Furchheim, P. ...
Steinfield, L. (2014). Materialism: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Marketing
Shrum, L. J., Wong, N., Arif, F., Chugani, S. K., Gunz, A., Lowrey, T. M. ... Sundie, J. (2013).
Corfman & J. Lynch (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, 23. (p. 311).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
61
Smolak, L., & Stein, J. A. (2006). The relationship of drive for muscularity to sociocultural
factors, self-esteem, physical attributes gender role, and social comparison in middle school
PT
Solberg, E. G., Diener, E., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why are materialists less satisfied? In T.
RI
Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture (pp. 29-48). Washington,
SC
Somer, E., & Ruvio, A. (2014). The going gets tough, so let's go shopping: On materialism,
NU
coping, and consumer behaviors under traumatic stress. Journal of Loss and Trauma,
19(5), 426-441.
MA
Spence, K. W. (1956), Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009). The importance of a general measure of brand
D
TE
Stewart, A. E., & Stewart, E. A. (2006). The preference to excel and its relationship to selected
CE
Sutton, C. (2013). Adolescent materialism, parental and peer materialism, parental and peer
from http://uobrep.openrepository.com/uobrep/handle/10547/345378.
Troisi, J. D., Christopher, A. N., & Marek, P. (2006). Materialism and money spending
Twenge, J. M., & Kasser, T. (2013). Generational changes in materialism and work centrality,
1976-2007: Associations with temporal changes in societal insecurity and materialistic role
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
62
Wallace, E., Buil, I., de Chernatony, L., & Hogan, M. (2014). Who “likes” you… and why? A
PT
Watson, D. C. (2014). A model of the materialistic self. North American Journal of Psychology,
RI
16(1), 137-158.
SC
Psychology, 18(2), 359-376.
NU
Watson, J. J. (2003). The relationship of materialism to spending tendencies, saving, and debt.
buying: A life course study in Australia. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19(4), 247-256.
D
TE
Wooten, D. B. (2006). From labeling possessions to possessing labels: Ridicule and socialization
Xu, Y. (2008). The influence of public self-consciousness and materialism on young consumers'
CE
Zerach, G. (2016). The mediating role of emptiness and materialism in the association between
Zhang, H., Tian, Y., Lei, B., Yu, S., & Liu, M. (2015). Personal relative deprivation boosts
PT
RI
SC
NU
MA
ED
PT
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
64
PT
RI
SC
NU
MA
ED
PT
CE
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
65
PT
RI
SC
NU
MA
ED
PT
CE
AC