Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/51039684
CITATIONS READS
20 549
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Azole-Resistant Candida species and their Susceptibility to combinations of Fluconazole and Artemisia annua Methanol
Extract View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Izuchukwu Ochiogu on 24 March 2016.
ABSTRACT Decoctions of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (Family Malvaceae) are very popular for the preparation of
homemade refreshing drinks and are also used medicinally for a variety of ailments. Particularly remarkable are the
various scientific reports supporting diuretic and antihypertensive potentials. It is therefore not unusual for patients who
are on orthodox antihypertensive medications to use medicinal H. sabdariffa drinks concomitantly without regard to the
possibility of herb– drug interactions. This possibility necessitated this study in which the pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic interactions of
H. sabdariffa extract (HSE) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT), a commonly prescribed diuretic drug, were examined. The
effects of concomitant administration of HSE on urine volume, urine pH, and urinary concentrations of sodium,
bicarbonate, and chloride ions, as well as on the pharmacokinetic parameters of HCT, were determined in experimental
rats and rabbits. Co-administration of HSE with HCT caused a significant increase in the volume of urine excreted and
resulted in a decrease in the pH of urine and the concentrations of sodium, bicarbonate, and chloride ions. Co -
administration of HSE (20–40 mg=kg) with HCT (10 mg=kg) increased and prolonged the plasma concentration, the
mean area under the concentration–time curve, and the volume of distribution of HCT achieved over the 24-hour
sampling period. The plasma clearance and the elimination rate constant of HCT decreased with increasing dose of
HSE co-administered with the HCT. The results of this study reveal a possible herb–drug interaction involving HCT
and HSE, used as an ingredient in medicinal or refreshing drinks in many countries.
640
H. SABDARIFFA EXTRACT–HCT INTERACTION 641
Treatment AUC ([mg=mL]×hour) Cmax (mg=mL) Tmax (hours) T1=2 (hours) Kel CL (mL=kg=hour) Vd (L=kg)
HCT (10 mg=mL)
Alone
þ HSE (20 mg=kg) 0.658 T
2.178 T 0.003
0.001 0.170 T 0.0
0.140 T 0.0 6.1T
4.0 0.0
T 0.0 1.32
2.19 T
T 0.003 0.524
0.316 T
T 0.006 5.3 TT 0.05
3.38 0.05 10.08
10.67 T
T 0.028
0.00 0.005 0.011
þ HSE (40 mg=kg) 2.389 T 0.008 0.142 T 0.0 6.1 T 0.0 8.97 T 0.01 0.077 T 0.006 3.02 T 0.01 39.10 T 0.057
Pharmacokinetic data were calculated from using drug concentration values measured in collected blood samples at different time points by assuming a
simple one-compartment model for each animal, and the mean values were recorded. Data are mean T SEM values.
AUC, area under the curve; CL, serum clearance rate; Cmax, maximum serum concentration; T1=2, half-life; Tmax, time to Cmax; Kel, elimination rate
constant; Vd, volume of distribution.
ume was recorded from the 1st hour up until the 24th tensive activities of H. sabdariffa-containing
hour. The combination of HSE and HCT also caused a beverages,3,16 patients should avoid concomitant usage of
decrease in urinary Naþ concentration compared with the a H. sabdariffa- containing herbal beverage with HCT
group ad- ministered HCT alone. The extract did not diuretics in the management of hypertension.
cause an atten- dant increase in the urinary excretion of
Naþ, Cl—, and HCO3—. These effects suggest a possible AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
benefit of HSE in cases of dilutional hyponatremia. The
tendency of the ex- tract to cause a decreased excretion This study was supported by the personal finances of
of Cl— and a decrease in pH suggests the possibility of the authors, and the authors have no conflict of interest
metabolic acidosis with pro- longed usage. to declare.
Consistent with an earlier report on the safety of
H. sabdariffa-containing beverages,15 the LD50 of the REFERENCE
ex- tract was estimated to be greater than 5 g=kg in our S
study. This may imply that the HSE is reasonably safe 1. Abu-Tarboush HM, Ahmed SA, Al Kahtani HA: Some nutri-
without any evidence of acute toxicities 12 when taken tional and functional properties of karkade (Hibiscus
alone as a bev- erage. Co-administration of HSE (20–40 sabdariffa) seed products. Cereal Chem 1997;74:352–355.
mg=kg) with HCT (10 mg=kg) increased and prolonged 2. Haruna AK: Cathartic activity of soborodo: the aqueous
the plasma concen- tration of HCT achieved over the extract of calyx of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Phytother Res
24-hour sampling period. As shown in Table 3, most of 1997;11:307– 308.
the pharmacokinetic param- eters of HCT evaluated 3. Haji Faraji M, Haji Tarkhani AH: The effect of sour tea (Hi-
were increased by the addition of HSE in the regimen. biscus sabdariffa) on essential hypertension. J
The mean concentration–time AUC is 0.658 when HCT Ethnopharmacol 1999;65:231–236.
was administered alone, but increased significantly in all 4. Ali BH, Al Wabel N, Blunden G: Phytochemical, pharmaco-
the other treatment groups where HCT was administered logical and toxicological aspects of Hibiscus sabdariffa L.: a
in combination with HSE. The maximum AUC was review. Phytother Res 2005;19:369–375.
recorded when 40 mg=kg HSE was administered with 5. Leung AY: Encyclopedia of Common Natural Ingredients Used
the HCT. Because the AUC indicates the total amount of in Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics. John Wiley, New York, 1980.
drug achieved in the body, the increased AUC caused by 6. Odigie IP, Ettarh RR, Adigun SA: Chronic administration of
HSE co-administration suggests a possible retention of aqueous extract of Hibiscus sabdariffa attenuates
HCT. hypertension and reverses cardiac hypertrophy in 2K-1C
CL, which is the volume of blood cleared of drug per hypertensive rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2003;86:181–185.
unit time,14 decreased with increasing dose of HSE co- 7. Herrera-Arellano A, Flores-Romero S, Chavez Soton MA,
Tor- torielleo J: Effectiveness and tolerability of a
admin- istered with the HCT. The reductions in the CL standardized extract from Hibiscus sabdariffa in patients with
means that less of the HCT will be cleared from the mild to moderate hy- pertension: a controlled and randomized
body at any given time with increasing dose of HSE clinical trial. Phytome- dicine 2004;11:375–382.
given together. The Vd depicts the pattern of distribution 8. Ajay M, Chai HJ, Mustafa AM, Gilani AH, Mustafa MR:
of drugs between intra- cellular and extracellular Me- chanisms of the anti-hypertensive effect of Hibiscus
compartments.14 In our study, the Vd of HCT increased sabdariffa L. calyces. J Ethnopharmacol 2007;109:388–393.
with increasing dose of HSE admin- istered together. 9. Mojiminiyi FB, Dikko M, Muhammad BY, Ojobor PD, Ajag-
The Kel of HCT decreased with increasing dose of HSE. bonna OP, Okolo RU, Igbokwe UV, Mojiminiyi UE,
Because Kel reflects the rate at which drug is removed Fagbemi MA, Bello SO, Anga TJ: Antihypertensive effect of
from the body, it implies that the HSE slows the rate an aqueous extract of the calyx of Hibiscus sabdariffa.
HCT elimination from the body. Fitoterapia 2007;78:292–297.
The study established significant alteration in both the 10. Herrera-Arellano A, Miranda-Sánchez J, Avila-Castro P,
pharmacodynamics and the pharmacokinetic indices of Herrera- Alvarez S, Jimenez Ferrer JE, Zamilpa A, Roman-
HCT caused by HSE when administered concurrently. Ramos R, Ponce-Monter H, Tortoriello J: Clinical effects
Although there is evidence supporting possible produced by a
antihyper-
644 NDU ET
AL.
standardized herbal medicinal product of Hibiscus sabdariffa 14. Galinsky RE, Svensson CK: Basic pharmacokinetics. In: Re-
on patients with hypertension. A randomized, double-blind, mington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 20th ed.
lisinopril-controlled clinical trial. Planta Med 2007;73:6–12. (Gennaro AR, ed.). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,
11. Harbourne JB: Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Philadel- phia, 2000, pp. 1127–1144.
Technique of Plant Analysis, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, 15. Askari A, Mirza M, Solangi MSP: Toxicological studies of
London, 1984, p. 282. herbal beverage and seeds extract of Hibiscus sabdariffa L.
12. Lorke D: A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing. (Roselle). Pak J Sci Ind Res 1996;39:38–42.
Arch Toxicol 1983;54:275–287. 16. Onyenekwe PC, Ajani, EO, Ameh DA, Gamaniel KS: Anti-
13. Rowland M, Tozer TN: Clinical Pharmacokinetics: Concepts hypertensive effect of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) calyx
and Applications. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, infusion in spontaneously hypertensive rats and a comparison
Philadelphia, 1995. of its toxicity with that in Wistar rats. Cell Biochem Funct
1999;17:199–206.