Design Calculation of Pile For NFR - ROB at Jagi Road

DESIGN CALCULATION OF PILE
FO R
CONSTRUCTION OF R.O.B. AT KM 67/9 TO 68/0 IN

BETWEEN STATION JAGIROAD AND AJURI
FOR
NORTH FRONTIER RAILWAY
(CONSTRUCTION)
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS :-
25N, Selimpur Road, Kolkata–700 031
DOCUMENT NO.: EISP/NFR-18/DC–01; Rev. – 01 Date: 13/12/2018

Load Calculation for Substructure of 30 m Single Span of Viaduct and Intermediate Pier No P1
[Reference Bore Hole-05]
Live Load:
Impact Factor (Class A) = 1+{9/(13.5+30) }= 1.21 [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No-208.2]
Impact Factor (70 R) = 1.21 [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No-208.2]
Congestion Factor = 1.7 [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No-204.4]
70 R Wheeled vehicle (100 T)
8 12 12 17 17 17 17
3.96 1.52 2.13 1.37 3.05 1.37
Load CG from rear end = ((17x1.37)+(17x(1.37+3.05))+(17(1.37x3.05+1.37))+(12x(1.37+3.05+1.37+2.13))+(12(1.37+3.05+1.37+2.13+1.52))+

(8x(1.37+3.05+1.37+2.13+1.52+3.96)))/(8+12+12+17+17+17+17) = 5.124 m
70 R Tracked vehicle
70 T
4.570
Load CG from rear end = 4.57/2 = 2.285 m
Class A
2.7 2.7 11.4 11.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8
1.1 3.2 1.2 4.3 3 3 3
Load CG from rear end = ((6.8x3)+(6.8x(3+3))+(6.8x(3+3+3))+(11.4x(3+3+3+4.3))+(11.4x(3+3+3+4.3+1.2))+(2.7x(3+3+3+4.3+1.2+3.2))+

(2.7x(3+3+3+4.3+1.2+3.2+1.1)))/(2.7+2.7+11.4+11.4+6.8+6.8+6.8+6.8) = 9.709 m
Live Load Cases For Substructure Loading For 30 m Span

Case 1: 70 R Wheeled Vehicle + 1 Lane of Class A
Minimum spacing between two successive vehicles is 30 m. [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No-204.1]
70R Wheeled Vehicle
No Other Vehicle
5.124
30 30
Total load for 70R = 100 T
Reaction at Intermediate Support = (24.8762/30)x1.21x1.7x100= 170.57 T (Including IF & CF)
Part load of Successive Class A Vehicle
11.4 11.4 Class A
6.8 2.7 2.7
0.2 20
9.709
30 30
Total load for Class A = 55.4 T
Reaction at Intermediate Support = [(20.291/30)x55.4x1.21x1.7]+[(10/30)x2.7x1.21x1.7]+[(8.9/30)x2.7x1.21x1.7]+[(5.7/30)x11.4x1.21x1.7]+
[(4.5/30)x11.4x1.21x1.7]+[(0.2/30)x6.8x1.21x1.7]= 88.64 T (Including IF & CF)
Total reaction at Intermediate Support = 170.57+88.64= 259.21 T (Including IF & CF)
Case 2: 70 R Tracked Vehicle + 1 Lane of Class A
70 T 70R Tracked Vehicle
2.285
30 30
Reaction at Intermediate Support = (27.715/30)x70x1.7x1.21= 133.02 T (Including IF & CF)
11.4 11.4 Class A
6.8 2.7 2.7
0.2 20
9.709
30 30
Total reaction at Intermediate Support = 221.66 T (Including IF & CF)
Case 3: 3 Lane of Class A

34.2 34.2 3 Lane Class A
20.4 8.1 8.1 20
0.2
9.709
30 30
Total load for 3 Lane Class A = [(20.291/30)x3x55.4x1.21x1.7]+[(10/30)x3x2.7x1.21x1.7]+[(8.9/30)x3x2.7x1.21x1.7]+[(5.7/30)x3x

11.4x1.21x1.7]+ [(4.5/30)x3x11.4x1.21x1.7]+[(0.2/30)x3x6.8x1.21x1.7]= 265.93 T
Reaction at Intermediate Support = 265.93 T (Including IF & CF)
1
Case 4: Special Vehicle
Total Load = 385 T
6 9.5 9.5 18 18 18 1.23 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

3.2 1.37 5.389 1.5
0.27
30 30
Max reaction at intermediate support = 271.61 T
So critical Live Load combination for substructure design is Case 4 i.e. plying of Special vehicle
Foothpath Live Load:
2
Considering Live Load for foothpath = 0.5 T/m
Width of Footpath = 1.5 m
Live load for Foothpath=0.5x1.5x31.2x2= 46.8 T
Braking Force:
There will be no braking force for Special Vehicle [ Ref: IRC 6-2017 : Cl No 204.5.4]
3 Lane of Class A
Max reaction for 3 Lane Class A vehicles = 265.93 T [ Three lane of Clas A vehicle]
Now max braking force appiled on intermediate span =(88.64x2x0.2+88.64x0.05)/1.21 = 32.965 T acting at 2.855 m from top of bearing
Push/Pull on each end bearing due to braking force = 3.1372 T (+/-)
Horzontal force on c/l of bearing = 32.965 T acting at 10.525 m from top of pile
Max moment due to braking force, Mz =32.965x10.525 = 346.957 T-m at top of pile
1Lane of Class A + 70R Wheled Vehicle
Max reaction for 1 Lane Class A + 70 R wheeled vehicles = 259.21 T
Now braking force appiled on intermediate span =(170.57x0.2+88.64x0.05)/1.21 = 31.856 T acting at 2.855 m from top of bearing
1Lane of Class A + 70R Tracked Vehicle
Max reaction for 1 Lane Class A + 70 R tracked vehicles = 133.02 T
Calculation of Transverse Eccentricity of Live Load:

(half reaction of 70 R) (half reaction of Class A)
85.285 85.285 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.93
1.8 1.63 3.83 1.8
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
CG of Load from left end = 6.842 m
CG of pier from left end = 7.80 m
So transverse eccentricity = 7.8 - 6.842 = 0.958 m
Transverse moment due to LL eccentricity, Mx =0.958x259.21= 248.32318 T-m
66.512 66.512 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.93
1.8 1.62 3.82 1.8
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
(half reaction of Class A)
44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.80
1.8 0.4 1.70 1.7 1.80
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
Max eccentricity for special vehicle= 0.3 m [ Ref: IRC 6-2017 : Cl No 204.5.3]
Hence the max transverse moment due to LL eccentricity, Mx = 248.323 T-m
2
Dead Load:
Super imposed dead load:
Max Overall length of single span = 31.2 m [Ref: Drawing No RDSO/B-11774]
Considering thickness of wearing course = 0.08 m
Clear Carriageway wdith of Road = 11 m [Ref: Drawing No RDSO/B-11774]
Total width of wearing course = 11 m
Unit weight of wearing course = 2.4 T/m3
Weight of wearing course =0.08x11x2.4x31.2= 65.89 T
Total SIDL = 65.89 T

Dead Load for Superstructure:
Total weight of steel for 30 span plate girder bridge = 139 T
[Ref: Drawing No RDSO/B-11774/12]
Thickness of Deck Slab = 0.25 m
Total width of deck = 15.6 m
Unit wt. of concrete = 2.5 T/m3
Total weight of deck slab=0.25x15.6x31.2x2.5= 304.2 T
Thickness of slab for Footpath portion = 0.1 m
Width of Foothpath = 1.6 m
Total weight of Foothpath portion =0.1x2.5x1.6x2x31.2= 24.96 T
Considering weight of Hand railing etc. = 0.3 T/m
Total weight for hand railing =0.3x2x31.2= 18.72 T
Total height of Crash Barrier = 0.975 m
Average width of crash barrier = 0.375 m
Weight of Crash barrier =0.975x0.375x2.5= 0.914 T/m
Total Weight of Crash barrier =2x0.914x31.2= 57.03 T
Total Dead Load for superstructure = 543.9 T 15.6
Dead Load for Substructure:

Pier cap
Considering Column type pier:
Length of Pier cap = 15.6 m 2
Width of Pier cap = 2.5 m 2
Avg. Depth of pier cap = 2m 6 Pier
Depth of col. At base = 4m
Depth of col. At top = 8m
Width of col. = 2m
Max. height of col. = 6m
Weight of Pier =[(4x10.28)+{0.5x(10.28+18.28)x2}]x2.5= 174.2 T
Weight of Pier cap =15.6x2.5x2x2.5= 195 T Pile cap
Considering weight of pedestal, seismic guard etc = 25 T
Total weight for Pier cap, Pier =174.2+195+25= 394.2 T 1200 mm Dia Pile
Total length of pile cap = 9m
Total width of pile cap = 9m 1 2 1 1 6 1
Depth of cap = 2m
Total weight of pile cap =9x9x2x2.5= 405 T

Total wt of soil = 38.189 T
Plan of Pier at Base Plan of Pier at Top
2 2
Total Dead Load=405+394.2+543.91+65.89+38.189= 1447.189 T Area A1 = 10.28 m Area A2 = 18.28 m
Max Transverse Moment, Mx = 248.3 T-m
Max Longitudinal Moment, Mz = 346.957 T-m
Total vertical load for Dead Load & live Load =1447.189+271.608+46.8= 1765.60 T
Dia of pile = 1200 mm
Considering Safe Vertical Load capacity of each Pile = 461 T
[Ref: Revised Geotechnical Investigation report for Peoposed Construction of ROB at Marigaon, BH 5]
Provide 9 nos of pile for each pile cap
Length of pile shaft = 33 m
Submerged wt of each pile = 55.9548 T
Load Summary for Deal Load + Live Load ( Braking Effect downward)
VD for sub- MXe for LL Vb for

VDS for SIDL MLb for
Load Cases VD for super-structure (T) structure & cap VL for LL (T) eccentricity( braking(down Wt of Filled
(T) Braking(T-m)
(T) T-m) ward)(+T) Soil (T)
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + special vehicle
543.9 837.389 65.89 318.41 81.4824 0 0 38.189
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + 3-Class A 543.9 837.389 65.89 312.73 186.151 346.957 3.1372 38.189
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(T)+Class A 543.9 837.389 65.89 268.46 142.3076 269.966 2.4410 38.189
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(W)+Class A 543.9 837.389 65.89 306.01 248.3232 335.284 3.0320 38.189
VD = Vertical Load for DL, VL = Vertical Load for LL MX = Transverse Moment, ML = Longitudinal Moment
Load Summary for Deal Load + Live Load ( Braking Effect upward)

Load Cases VD for super-structure (T) structure & cap VL for LL (T) eccentricity( braking Wt of Filled
(T) Braking(T-m)
(T) T-m) (upward)(-T) Soil (T)
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + special vehicle 543.9 837.389 65.89 318.41 81.4824 0 0 38.189
3
Critical Load Combination for max & min pile reaction is DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(W)+Class A
Max vertical Load = 1794.420 T Min vertical Load = 1788.4

Mx
CG of pile cap is at the location of P5 pile
Pile X Z
1 2 3 1 -3.6 -3.6
2 -3.6 0
Z 3.6 3 -3.6 3.6
4 0 -3.6
4 5 6 Mz 5 0 0
6 0 3.6
3.6 7 3.6 -3.6
X 8 3.6 0
7 8 9 9 3.6 3.6
3.6 3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76
Min. Compression :
Reaction at P-1 = 1788.356/9+(248.32318x-3.6)/77.76+(335.284x-3.6)/77.76
= 171.687 T
Net reaction at pile =171.687+55.9548= 227.64 T < 461 T
Max. Compression :
Reaction at P-9 = 1794.42/9+(248.32318x3.6)/77.76+(335.284x3.6)/77.76
226.399 T
Max reaction at pile =226.399+55.9548= 282.3538 T < 461 T
Summary of Pile Reactions (P1 & P9) for Deal Load + Live Load
Net Reaction
Net Reaction at P1
Load Cases at P2 (T)
(T) Min
Max
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + special vehicle 252.603 260.148
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + 3-Class A 230.715 280.774
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(T)+Class A 231.468 270.184
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(W)+Class A 227.642 282.354
Reaction break up for Different Loading Component at P1 pile for Critical Combination
Reaction for Dead Load of super & sub-structure = 1381.299/9= 157.721 T

Reaction for SIDL = 65.89/9= 7.321 T
Reaction for LL (vertical component) = 306.01/9= 34.001 T
Reaction for LL (LL eccentricity moment component) = 248.32318x-3.6/77.76= -11.496 T
Reaction for LL (Braking moment component) = 335.284x-3.6/77.76= -15.522 T
Reaction for LL (Braking(-ve) vertical component) = -3.032/9= -0.337 T
Submerged wt of pile = 55.955 T

Reaction for LL (LL eccentricity moment component) = 248.32318x3.6/77.76= 11.496 T
Reaction for LL (Braking moment component) = 335.284x3.6/77.76= 15.522 T
Reaction for LL (Braking(-ve) vertical component) = 3.032/9= 0.337 T
Seismic Load:
Importance factor ,I = 1.2 [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.1.1 Table 19]
Zone factor (Zone V) , Z = 0.36 [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.2]
Sa/g = 2.5 [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.1]
Response reduction factor,R= 3 [ For column type structure, as per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.5 Table 20]
So, Horizontal seismic coefficient,Ah=(0.36/2)x1.2x2.5/3= 0.18

Seismic Load in the direction of Perpendicular to traffic
Live Load Component:(3-Class A) [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
Effective Live Load =0.2x265.93/1.21= 43.955 T [20% of Max LL without IF]
Effective LL for footpath = 9.36 T [20% of Max LL(Foothpath)]
Considering max height of bearing = 0.35 m 0.35
Load CG for Live Load from top of pedestal =2.855+0.35= 3.205 m
Load CG for Dead Load from top of pedestal =0.961+0.35= 1.311 m Pier cap 2
Transverse Moment due to LL eccentricity =186.151x0.2= 37.23 T-m
Horizontal force during Seismic for LL =0.18x53.315 = 9.597 T

Acting 3.205+0.35+2+8= 13.555 m from bottom of pile cap 6 Pier
Transverse Moment at top of pile due to LL =9.597x13.555+37.23= 167.32 T-m
Vertical force during Seismic for LL =9.597x2/3 = 6.40 T(+/-)
Horizontal Braking force =32.965x0.2 = 6.593 T
Acting at 10.525 m from bottom of pile cap
Longitudinal moment at top of pile due to braking=6.593x10.525= 69.391 T-m
Pile cap
Vertical downward force for brainkg effect during SL = 0.6274 T
Vertical upward force for brainkg effect during SL = 0.6274 T
1200 mm Dia Pile
Live Load Component:(70R(W)+Class A) [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
Considering max height of bearing = 0.35 m
Load CG for Dead Load from top of pedestal =0.961+0.35= 1.311 m
4
Acting 3.205+0.35+2+8= 13.555 m from bottom of pile cap
Live Load Component:(70R(T)+Class A) [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]


Vertical downward force for brainkg effect during SL = 0.488 T 8
Super Imposed Dead Load Component: 2 CG = 2/3x(20/12)
SIDL from superstructure = 65.9 T 4 = 1.111
Horizontal force during Seismic for SIDL(Superstructure) =65.89x0.18= 11.86 T
Moment at top of pile due to SIDL(Superstructure) =11.661x11.86= 138.300 T-m Pier cap
Vertical force during Seismic for SIDL(Superstructure) =11.86x2/3 = 7.91 T(+/-)
Dead Load Component: 2
Dead Load from superstructure = 543.9 T CG of Pier cap from pile cap
Horizontal force during Seismic for DL(Superstructure) =543.91x0.18= 97.90 T Pier =[(2.5x4x10.28x2)+
Acting at 1.311+0.35+2+8= 11.661 m from bottom of pile cap 4 (2.5x2x14.28x5.111)]/
Moment at top of pile due to DL(Superstructure) =11.661x97.9= 1141.610 T-m 174.2= 3.275
Vertical force during Seismic for DL(Superstructure) =97.9x2/3 = 65.27 T E.G.L 0 m
Wt of Pier cap = 195 T Earth filling
Horizontal force during Seismic for wt of pier cap=195x0.18= 35.10 T
Acting at (2/2)+8 = 9 m from bottom of pile cap Pile cap
Moment at top of pile due to wt of pier cap =9x35.1= 315.90 T-m
Vertical force during Seismic for wt of pier cap =35.1x2/3 = 23.40 T
Wt of Pier = 174.2 T
1200 mm Dia Pile
Horizontal force during Seismic for wt of pier =174.2x0.18= 31.356 T
Acting at 3.275+2 = 5.275 m from bottom of pile cap
Moment at top of pile due to wt of pier = 165.4 T-m
Vertical force during Seismic for wt of pier =31.356x2/3 = 20.904 T
Total vertical force during seismic for Dead Load = 158.17 T (+/-)
Total horizontal force during seismic for Dead Load = 237.26 T
Vertical load for DL of pile cap = 405.00 T
Horizontal force during seismic for DL of pile cap =405x0.18= 72.9 T
Vertical load for SL of pile cap = 48.6 T
Moment for SL of pile cap = 72.9 T-m
3
Avg unit wt of soil = 1.80 T/m
Total wt of soil =(81-10.28)x1.8x0.3= 38.189 T
Depth of filled soil over top of pile cap = 0.30 m
Load Summary for Deal Load + Reduced Live Load +Seismic Load(Transverse) [Vertical SL Downward]
VL for MX for LL ML for Vb for VS for

VD for super& sub- VS for
Load Classes VDS for SIDL (T) reduced LL eccentricity+ Braking+SL braking(down Transverse
structure,cap,soil (T) Longitudinal (T)
(T) SL(T-m) (T-m) ward)(+T) (T)
5
Load Summary for Deal Load + Reduced Live Load +Seismic Load(Transverse) [Vertical SL Upward]

Load Classes VDS for SIDL (T) reduced LL eccentricity+ Braking+SL braking(upwa Transverse
(T) SL(T-m) (T-m) rd)(+T) (T)
Max vertical Load = 1724.149 T Min vertical Load = 1274.6 T
Mx
1 2 3
Z 3.6
Mz Direction of Traffic
4 5 6
X
3.6 3.6
7 8 9
3.6 3.6 CG of pile cap is at the location of P5 pile

Pile X Z
X = Direction of Traffic 1 -3.6 -3.6
Z = Perpendicular to Direction of Traffic 2 -3.6 0
Now total, Mz = 67.057 T-m 3 -3.6 3.6
Now total, Mx = 2561 T-m Total shear, Fz = 264.88 T 4 0 -3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76 5 0 0
Min. Compression during Seismic: 6 0 3.6
Net Vertical force = 1274.64 T T 7 3.6 -3.6
8 3.6 0
Reaction at P-1 = 1274.639/9+(2561.383x-3.6)/77.76+(67.057x-3.6)/77.76 9 3.6 3.6
= 19.94 T <
Net reaction at pile =19.94+55.9548= 75.8948 T < 576.25 T [ safe vertical load capacity of Pile under SL]
Max. Compression during Seismic:

Net Vertical force = 1724.149 T
Reaction at P-9 = 1724.149/9+(2561.383x3.6)/77.76+(67.057x3.6)/77.76

= 313.259 T
Max reaction at pile =313.259+55.9548= 369.2138 T < 576.25 T [ Safe vertical load capacity of Pile under SL]
Horizontal Load Summary for Deal Load + Reduced Live Load +Seismic Load(Transverse)
HL for
HD for super& sub- Hb for
Load Classes HDS for SIDL (T) reduced LL
structure,cap, (T) braking(T)
(T)
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + 3-Class A 237.3 11.86 9.60 7.7797
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(T)+Class A 237.3 11.86 8.28 6.0534
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(W)+Class A 237.3 11.86 9.40 6.3712
Max horizontal force = 266.49 T
Summary of Pile Reactions (P1 & P9) for Deal Load + Reduced Live Load+ seismic Load (Transverse)
Net
Net
Net Reaction Reaction
Load Cases Horizontal
at P1 (T) Min at P2 (T)
force (T)
Max
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + 3-Class A 76.338 369.017 29.610
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(T)+Class A 77.615 366.114 29.272
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(W)+Class A 75.894 369.214 29.432
Reaction for Dead Load of super & sub-structure = 153.478 T

Reaction for SIDL = 7.3211 T
Reaction for Reduced LL (vertical component) = 5.801 T
Reaction for LL+SL (LL eccentricity+SL moment component) = -118.583 T
Reaction for LL+SL (Braking moment+SL component) = -3.104 T
Reaction for LL +SL (Braking(-ve) vertical component) = -0.0670 T
Reaction for SL = -24.9050 T

Reaction for LL+SL (LL eccentricity+SL moment component) = 118.583 T
Reaction for LL+SL (Braking moment+SL component) = 3.104 T
Reaction for LL +SL (Braking(-ve) vertical component) = 0.0670 T
Reaction for SL = 24.9050 T
6
SL in the direction of traffic
Live Load Component:(3-Class A)
Effective Live Load = 0.000 T
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
Horizontal force during Seismic for LL = 0.00 T
Verticle load due to SL ( LL+ Footpath LL) = 6.40 T
Live Load Component:(70R (W)+ Class A)
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
Live Load Component:(70R (T)+ Class A)
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
Super Imposed Dead Load Component:
SIDL from superstructure = 65.9 T
Moment at top of pile due to SIDL(Superstructure) =11.661x11.86= 138.300 T-m
Dead Load Component:

Horizontal force during Seismic for DL(Superstructure), DL for Pier, Pier cap etc will same as in SL in perpendiculat direction traffic.
Dead Load from superstructure = 543.91 T
Horizontal force during Seismic for DL(Superstructure) =543.91x0.18= 97.90 T
Acting at 1.311+0.35+2+8= 11.661 m from bottom of pile cap
Moment at top of cap due to DL(Superstructure) =11.661x543.91= 1141.610 T-m
Vertical force during Seismic for DL(Superstructure) =543.91x2/3 = 65.27 T(+/-)
Wt of Pier cap = 195 T
Acting at (2/2)+8 = 9 m from bottom of pile cap
Vertical force during Seismic for wt of pier cap =35.1x2/3 = 23.40 T(+/-)
Vertical force during Seismic for wt of pier =31.356x2/3 = 20.904 T(+/-)
Total horizontal shear at cap during SL =31.356+35.1+97.9= 237.26 T

Vertical force during SL =20.904+23.4+65.27+38.189= 158.17 T

3
Depth of filled soil over top of pile cap = 0.30 m 2001.43 600.429 2434.54
Load Summary for Deal Load + Reduced Live Load +Seismic Load(longitudinal) [Vertical SL Downward]
VL for Vb for VS for

VD for super& sub- ML for SL(T- Total ML for VS for
Load Classes VDS for SIDL (T) reduced LL braking(down Longitudinal
structure,cap,soil (T) m) SL (T-m) Transverse (T)
(T) ward)(+T) (T)
Load Summary for Deal Load + Reduced Live Load +Seismic Load(longitudinal) [Vertical SL Upward]

(T) ward)(+T) (T)
Critical Load Combination for max & min pile reaction is DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 3-Class A
7
Mx
1 2 3
3.6 Direction of Traffic
Z
Mz
4 5 6
X 3.6
7 8 9

Pile X Z
Now total, Mz = 7.2 T-m 3 -3.6 3.6
Now total, ML = 2437.46 T-m Total shear, Fx = 249.12 T 4 0 -3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76 5 0 0
Net Vertical force = 1222.9620 T 7 3.6 -3.6
Reaction at P-1 = 1222.962/9+(2437.455x-3.6)/77.76+(7.2x-3.6)/77.76 8 3.6 0
= 22.706 T 9 3.6 3.6
Net reaction at pile =22.706+55.9548= 78.6608 T < 576.25 T [ Safe vertical load capacity of Pile under SL]
Total Vertical force = 1671.416 T
Reaction at P-9 = 1671.416/9+(2437.455x3.6)/77.76+(7.2x3.6)/77.76
= 298.891 T
Horizontal Load Summary for Deal Load + Reduced Live Load +Seismic Load(Longitudinal)
HD for super&
HL for
sub- HDS for SIDL Hb for
Load Classes reduced LL
(T)
(T)
Summery of Pile Reactions (P1 & P9) for Deal Load + Reduced Live Load+ seismic Load (Transverse)
Net
Net
force (T)
Max
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + 3-Class A -5.783 #REF! 27.680
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(T)+Class A -5.394 438.901 27.680
DL of Super-structure,sub-structure,pile cap + 70R(W)+Class A -5.791 439.298 27.680

Reaction for SL (SL moment component) = -112.845 T
78.994

Reaction for SL (SL moment component) = 112.845 T
Design Force for Pile Reinforcement under ULS [Ref: RC -6: 2017-Table B.2]
PSF for DL = 1.35

PSF for SIDL = 1.75
PSF for LL = 1.5
PSF for SL = 1.5
For Basic Combination:
Max reaction on pile =1.35x157.721+1.75x7.321+61.356x1.5+1.35x55.9548= 393.3081 T
Min reaction on pile =1.35x157.721+1.75x7.321+1.5x34.001+1.5x-27.355x1.5+1.35x55.9548= 311.2431 T
Max horizontal force per pile = 5.494 T
For Seismic Combination:
Max reaction on pile =1.35x153.478+1.75x7.321+1.5x5.801+1.5x146.659+55.9548x1.35= 524.236 T
Min reaction on pile =1.35x153.478+1.75x7.321+1.5x5.801+1.5x-146.659+55.9548x1.35= 84.25903 T
Design Force for Stressess in Pile under SLS [Ref: RC -6: 2017-Table B.3]
PSF for DL = 1
PSF for SIDL = 1.2
PSF for LL = 1
PSF for WL/SL = 1
For Rare Combination:
For, DL+LL Max reaction = 283.82 T Moment = 18.863 T-m
For, DL+SL Max reaction = 370.68 T Moment = 152.492 T-m
8
Calculation of Wind load:
Design wind speed = 50 m/sec
Max height of structure = 12 m
2
So horizontal wind pressure, Pz = 1500 N/m [Ref: IRC 6-2017: Cl No 209.2 Table 12]
Gust factor , G = 2 [Ref: IRC 6-2017: Cl No 209.3.3]
Depth of plate girder = 1.5 m
Cic distance of two girder = 2.5 m
Drag co-efficient, CD= 2.375
Total depth of obstructed area including girder, slab etc = 2.75 m
Total length of obstructed area = 31 m
2
Obstructed area =31x2.75= 85.25 m
Transverse wind force for super structure, FT = 60.74 T
2
Obstructed area for pier cap = 5m
2
Obstructed area for pier = 12 m
Transverse wind force for sub-structure, FT = 12.113 T
No live load shall be considered during wind loading as the design wind speed is greater than 36 m/sec [Ref: IRC 6-2017: Cl No 209.3.7]
Total horizontal force for transverse wind = 72.85 T << 264.88 T(horizontal force in Transeverse Seismic)
The piles are checked under the critical load case i.e. Seismic Load.
Design of Pile at BH 05
fck = 35 Mpa ftk = 500 Mpa

Clear Cover = 50 mm
Dia of Pile = 1200 mm
Safe Load capacity of pile = 461 T
Critical Load Combination: Seismic Combination:

Case 1: Max Compression:
Max Axial load, NED = 369.2138 T
Factored load = 524.23603 T
Level E.G.L. is considered as 0M
Cut-off level of this pile = (-)2.3.0M Lev. i.e. 2.3m. below E.G.L.
Calculation of depth of fixity of of Pile: As Per ANNEX-C IS:2911-2010 Part-I/Sec-2

For Normally Loaded Clay , (As per CL-C.2.3)
Stiffness Factor ,T=5 √ (EI/nh)
Ec = 5000 x √fck = 5000 x √35 = 29580.39892 N/mm² ≈ 29580.4 MN/m²
Ip =Moment of inertia of 1200 Φ pile cross-section
4 4
Ip= π / 64 x (1.2) = 0.10179 m
B = Width of pile shaft = 1200 mm
The value of nh shall be calculated from Table 3, Annex 3, IS: 2911-2010 based on N value given in soil report.
Considering the depth of soil below 1.5 m from EGL to 9 m from EGL [ For BH 03 & 05]
Average value of N = (4+6+12+15+14)/5 = 10.2
3
So, nh = 1.4 MN/m
T = 4.640 m
Now the embedded length of pile, Le = 33 m
[Ref: Revised Soil Report prepared by North East Engineers]
Le> 4R Hence the pile will act as long pile and fig. 2 of above referred code is valid for above pile.
Length of pile above G.L., L1= 0m
\ L1/T = 0
From fig. 2 (Determination of depth of fixity) of IS:2911 (Part I/Sec. 2) – 2010
Lf/T = 2.2 i.e Lf = 10.208 m Taking Lf = 10.3 m
[As per soil report, at depth of 10.5 m from EGL the N value is 15 which shall be taken for calculation of average N value
But here we don’t consider that N vakue for conservative approach.]
Provide, 20 no. Of 25 mm bar upto termination level

and 20 no. Of 25 mm bar upto 11.6 m as longitudinal steel
Calculation of Horizontal Deflection of Pile: [ Ref: IS 2911-2010]
Depth of fixity, zf = 10.3 m

e = cantilever length above ground/bed = 0 mm
Max Horizontal Force = 266.49 T (Taken by 9 nos of pile)
Max Horizontal Force in each pile = 29.61 T
3 3
For Fixed head pile, y = Hx10 (e+zf) /(12EI) = 8.955 mm < 1% of pile dia = 12 mm
[Ref: IRC 78-2014, Cl No 709.3.5.2]
Hence the horizontal deflection of pile is within permissible limit i.e. within serviceability limit.
Shear Check of Pile:

Again, Permissible shear strength of members under axial compression
= δ.t c
where, δ = 1 + 3P/(Ag.fck) or if >1.5,=1.5 ;
For piles,As = longitudinal tensile reinforcement at pile top = 98.175 cm²
Effective dia. of pile shaft, d = (1200/10)-((100+(25/2))/10 = 108.75 cm
\ þt = (100 x As)/(π/4 x d²) = 100x98.175/3.14x0.25x108.75^2= 1.057 %
\ tc = 0.74 N/mm²
2
Now, Pu = 524.23603 T = 524236.03 N Ag = π/4 x (1200)² = 1130973 mm
\δ= 1+((3x524236.03)/(1130973.355x35))= 1.04
2
Take actual= 1.04 N/mm
\ Permissible shear stress of pile (concrete section only) = 0.7696 N/mm2
9
\ Shear capacity of pile (considering concrete section only i.e. ignoring shear capacity of links)
=0.7696x3.14x0.25x108.75^2x100 = 714.85 kN
Unfactored shear capacity of pile = 476.5667 kN > 296.1 kN

Moment Check of Pile:
The horizontal shear at top of pile will cause horizontal deflection resulting a moment on pile at fixity level.
Since, the piles are considered as fixed head (for max. lateral deflection).
Actual moment on pile, M = m. MF where m = reduction factor
[Ref. Fig. – 3B Appendix – C, of IS:2911 (Part I/Sec. 2) – 2010]
& MF = Fixed end moment of the equivalent cantilever length of pile Mf = H(e+zf)/2
For above pile, L1/R = 0, m= 1 (As top portion of pile designed as Structural Column)
\ Actual moment on pile = 1*29.61*(0+10.3)/2= 152.492 T-m = 1524.92 KN-m
Factored moment = 228.738 T-m
Load on pile, Pu = 5242.36 KN ;
\Pu/fckD²= ( (5242.36x1000)/(35x(1200^2))= 0.104
Now, D=1200& d' =50+(25/2)= 62.5 mm. & d’/D = 0.052083 Take d'/D= 0.05
2
\ As = 19635 mm
þ =(19635x100)/(3.14x0.25x1200^2)= 1.736 %
\ þ/fck = 0.0496
From chart 59 of SP-16, Muperm./fckD³ = 0.06
i.e. Muperm (0.06x35x(1200^3))/(10^7)= 362.88 T-m > 228.738 T-m (Factored Moment)
Mworking permissible = 362.88/1.5= 241.92 T-m > 152.492 T-m
> Actual moment on pile Hence safe
Hence the pile section and reinforcements provided is safe & o.k.
Calculation of Confinement Steel: [Ref: IRC 112]
2
Gross area of concrete, Ac = 1130400 mm
2
Confined core area, Acc = 949850 mm
ηk = 0.0933 > 0.08
Confinement is required
Dia of bar = 16 mm
Dia of hoop , Dsp = 1100 mm
2
Area of hoop bar, Asp= 200.96 mm
Spacing of bar, SL = 100 mm
Volumetric ratio, ρw = 0.00730764
2 2
Now, f cd = 15.633 N/mm f yd = 434.78 N/mm
ωwd = 0.2032
Now, Long reinforcement ratio = 0.01736
ωw,req = 0.067701742
ωw,min = 0.18
ωwd,c = 0.18
For ωwd = 0.18 ρw = 0.0064722
2
Required Asp = 177.99 mm
Hence OK
Provide 16 dia tor as hoop bar @ 100 mm c/c upto 3.6 m depth as confinement steel
Case 2: Min Compression:

Min. Axial load, NED = 75.8948 T

Ec = 5000 x √fck = 5000 x √35 = 29580.39892 N/mm² ≈ 29580.4 MN/m²
4 4
Ip= π / 64 x (1.2) = 0.10179 m
3
So, nh = 1.4 MN/m
T = 4.6399812 m
\ L1/T = 0

10

3 3
[Ref: IRC 78-2014, Cl No 709.3.5.2]

= δ.t c
\ þt = (100 x As)/(π/4 x d²) = 100x98.175/3.14x0.25x108.75^2= 1.057 %
\ tc = 0.74 N/mm²
2
Now, Pu = 84.25903 T = 84259.03 N Ag = π/4 x (1200)² = 1130973 mm
\δ= 1+((3x84259.0300000001)/(1130973.355x35))= 1.006
2
=0.74444x3.14x0.25x108.75^2x100 = 691.48 kN

\Pu/fckD²= ( (842.59x1000)/(x(mm2^2))= 0.0167
Now, D=1200& d' =50+(25/2)= 62.5 mm. \ d’/D = 0.052083 Take d'/D= 0.05
2
\ As = 19635 mm
þ =(19635x100)/(3.14x0.25xmm2^2)= 1.736 %
\ þ/fck = 0.0496
i.e. Muperm (0.05x35x(1200^3))/(10^7)= 302.4 T-m > 228.738 T-m (Factored moment)
\ Mworking permissible = 302.4/1.5= 201.6 T-m > 152.492 T-m
11
Determination of Stresses for 1200mm dia Pile subjected to Axial Load & Moment under SLS.
Pier-P1
Material parameters (Max Compression)
Grade of concrete = M 35
Characteristic strength of concrete fck = 35 N/mm 2
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Yield stress of steel fy = 500 N/mm 2
Max. Permissible stresses in concrete in compresssion = 16.8 N/mm 2 [IRC 112]
Max. Permissible stresses for steel in flexural tension = 348 N/mm 2
Ec = 29580.4 N/mm 2 Es = 200000 N/mm 2
Modular ratio m = 6.76

1.5 x m = 10.14
Member forces
Axial load on pile = 370.68 T = P = 370678 kg
Moment on the pile = 152.492 T.m = Mz = 15249200 kg.cm
Geometrical parameters used in the evaluation of crack width of the pile

Diameter of Pile = 1200 mm = D = 120 cm
Distance between centre of the section to the outer most fibre R = 60 cm
No of longitudinal rebars Nb = 20 Nos
Diameter of longitudinal rebars φ rebar = 25 mm
Area of the longitudinal reinforcment Ast = 196.35 cm2
Clear cover to reinforcement c = 5 cm
Effective cover = clear cover + cg of the rebar dc = 6.41 cm
Assuming that the steel bars are equivalent to a thin shell of the same cross sectional area
Diameter of thin shell of reinforcement Dshell = 107.18 cm
Distance between centre of section to cg of main steel (inner radius) ir = 53.6 cm
Effective depth of pile cross section deff = 113.6 cm
Secondary parameters used in the evaluation of crack width of the pile
 Nd  0.5  D  Cos α
Cos     = 0.174
 0 .5  D 
Cos  
Nd  0.5  D Cos β = 0.195
r
Sin α = 0.985
Nd R
Sin β = 0.981
 d α = 1.3961 radians
R  β
N
 A
= 1.3750 radians
Sin 4α = -0.643
Sin 2α = 0.342
Sin 2β = 0.382
Determination of neutral axis
Thickness of thin shell of reinforcement Ast / (2 π r) tshell = 0.583 cm
Assuming Neutral axis depth Coefficient N = 0.6200
Depth of Neutral axis (N x deff) dn = 70.43 cm
Expressions for evaluating f s1 from ∑P
Total compression in concrete above neutral axis, Cc Cc = 2974 fs1
Total compression in steel above neutral axis, Cs Cs = 576 fs1
Total tension in steel below neutral axis, Ts Ts = 229 fs1
Expressions for evaluating f s2 from ∑M
Moment of compression in concrete about the centre line of section MCc = 93261 fs2
Moment of compression in steel about the centre line of section MCs = 22804 fs2
Moment of tension in steel about the centre line of section MTs = 10203 fs2
Net axial stresses on the pile section Caxial = 3321 fs1

Net bending stresses on the pile section Cben = 126268 fs2
Evaluation of extreme fibre stress in concrete
Evaluation of extreme fibre stress in concrete by first condition of equilibrium, i.e, ∑P = 0
Axial Load, P = (Cc + Cs - Ts) x fs1 fs1 = P/Caxial = 112 kg/cm 2
Evaluation of extreme fibre stress in concrete by second condition of equilibrium, i.e, ∑M = 0
Moment, M = (MCc + MCs + MTs) x fs2 fs2 = M/Cben = 121 kg/cm 2
Evaluation of internal forces & moments on cross section of pile
Total compression in concrete above neutral axis Cc = 331990 kg
Total compression in steel above neutral axis Cs = 64287 kg
Total tension in steel below neutral axis Ts = 25607 kg
Moment of compression in concrete about the centre line of section MCc = 11263147 kg.cm
Moment of compression in steel about the centre line of section MCs = 2753998 kg.cm
Moment of tension in steel about the centre line of section MTs = 1232210 kg.cm
The mean value of f s1 & fs2 has been adopted as the final extreme fibre stress in concrete
fs1 = 111.6 kg/cm 2
fs2 = 120.8 kg/cm 2
Maximum compressive stress, c= 0.5 x (111.63 + 120.77) = 116.2 kg/cm2
= 11.4 N/mm 2
< 16.8 N/mm 2 Safe
Now, D-dn = 49.57 cm
The tensile stress at the centroid of tensile steel is evaluated as under
t= m c (D-d n )/dn = 829 kg/cm 2 81.2850 N/mm 2
2
< 348 N/mm Safe
Pier-P1
Ec = 29580.4 N/mm 2 Es = 200000 N/mm 2

1.5 x m = 10.14
Member forces

 Nd  0.5  D  Cos α
Cos     = 0.174
 0 .5  D 
Cos  
Nd  0.5  D Cos β = 0.195
r
Sin α = 0.985
Nd R
Sin β = 0.981
 d α = 1.3961 radians
R  β
N
 A
= 1.3750 radians
Sin 4α = -0.643
Sin 2α = 0.342
Sin 2β = 0.382

fs1 = 111.6 kg/cm 2
fs2 = 120.8 kg/cm 2
= 11.4 N/mm 2
< 16.8 N/mm 2 Safe
2
< 348 N/mm Safe
Load Calculation for Substructure of 30 m Single Span of Viaduct and Intermediate Pier No P2 & P3
Live Load:
8 12 12 17 17 17 17
3.96 1.52 2.13 1.37 3.05 1.37

(8x(1.37+3.05+1.37+2.13+1.52+3.96)))/(8+12+12+17+17+17+17) = 5.124 m
70 T
4.570
Class A
2.7 2.7 11.4 11.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8
1.1 3.2 1.2 4.3 3 3 3

(2.7x(3+3+3+4.3+1.2+3.2+1.1)))/(2.7+2.7+11.4+11.4+6.8+6.8+6.8+6.8) = 9.709 m

70R Wheeled Vehicle
No Other Vehicle
5.124
30 30
11.4 11.4 Class A
6.8 2.7 2.7
0.2 20
9.709
30 30
2.285
30 30
11.4 11.4 Class A
6.8 2.7 2.7
0.2 20
9.709
30 30

20.4 8.1 8.1 20
0.2
9.709
30 30

11.4x1.21x1.7]+ [(4.5/30)x3x11.4x1.21x1.7]+[(0.2/30)x3x6.8x1.21x1.7]= 265.93 T
1
Total Load = 385 T
6 9.5 9.5 18 18 18 1.23 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

3.2 1.37 5.389 1.5
0.27
30 30
2
Braking Force:
3 Lane of Class A

85.285 85.285 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.93
1.8 1.63 3.83 1.8
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
66.512 66.512 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.93
1.8 1.62 3.82 1.8
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.80
1.8 0.4 1.70 1.7 1.80
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
2
Dead Load:


Pier cap
Width of col. = 2m
Depth of cap = 2m

2 2
[Ref: Revised Geotechnical Investigation report for Peoposed Construction of ROB at Marigaon, BH3]

(T) Braking(T-m)
543.9 837.389 65.89 318.41 81.4824 0 0 38.189

(T) Braking(T-m)
3

Mx
Pile X Z
1 2 3 1 -3.6 -3.6
2 -3.6 0
Z 3.6 3 -3.6 3.6
4 0 -3.6
4 5 6 Mz 5 0 0
6 0 3.6
3.6 7 3.6 -3.6
X 8 3.6 0
7 8 9 9 3.6 3.6
3.6 3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76
Min. Compression :
Reaction at P-1 = 1788.356/9+(248.32318x-3.6)/77.76+(335.284x-3.6)/77.76
= 171.687 T
Max. Compression :
Reaction at P-9 = 1794.42/9+(248.32318x3.6)/77.76+(335.284x3.6)/77.76
226.399 T
Net Reaction
Net Reaction at P1
(T) Min
Max


Seismic Load:


Pile cap
1200 mm Dia Pile
4


1200 mm Dia Pile
3

5

(T) SL(T-m) (T-m) rd)(+T) (T)
Mx
1 2 3
Z 3.6
4 5 6
X
3.6 3.6
7 8 9

Pile X Z
Now total, Mz = 67.057 T-m 3 -3.6 3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76 5 0 0
8 3.6 0
Reaction at P-1 = 1274.639/9+(2561.383x-3.6)/77.76+(67.057x-3.6)/77.76 9 3.6 3.6
= 19.94 T <

Reaction at P-9 = 1724.149/9+(2561.383x3.6)/77.76+(67.057x3.6)/77.76

= 313.259 T
HL for
(T)
Net
Net
force (T)
Max


6
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]



3
Total wt of soil =(0-)x1.8x0.3= 38.189 T

(T) ward)(+T) (T)

(T) ward)(+T) (T)
7
Mx
1 2 3
Z
Mz
4 5 6
X 3.6
7 8 9

Pile X Z
Now total, Mz = 7.2 T-m 3 -3.6 3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76 5 0 0
Reaction at P-1 = 1222.962/9+(2434.539x-3.6)/77.76+(7.2x-3.6)/77.76 8 3.6 0
= 22.841 T 9 3.6 3.6
Reaction at P-9 = 1671.416/9+(2434.539x3.6)/77.76+(7.2x3.6)/77.76
= 298.756 T
HD for super&
HL for
(T)
(T)
Net
Net
force (T)
Max
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + 3-Class A -14.261 430.812 27.680


PSF for DL = 1.35

PSF for SIDL = 1.75
PSF for LL = 1.5
PSF for SL = 1.5
PSF for DL = 1
PSF for SIDL = 1.2
PSF for LL = 1
PSF for WL/SL = 1
8
2
2
2
2

Clear Cover = 50 mm


Ec = 5000 x √fck = 5000 x √35 = 29580.39892 N/mm² ≈ 29580.4 MN/m²
4 4
Ip= π / 64 x (1.2) = 0.10179 m
3
So, nh = 1.4 MN/m
T = 4.640 m
\ L1/T = 0


3 3
[Ref: IRC 78-2014, Cl No 709.3.5.2]

= δ.t c
\ þt = (100 x As)/(π/4 x d²) = 100x98.175/3.14x0.25x108.75^2= 1.057 %
\ tc = 0.74 N/mm²
2
Now, Pu = 512.79073 T = 512790.73 N Ag = π/4 x (1200)² = 1130973 mm
\δ= 1+((3x512790.73)/(1130973.355x35))= 1.039
2
9
=0.76886x3.14x0.25x108.75^2x100 = 714.16 kN

\Pu/fckD²= ( (5127.907x1000)/(35x(1200^2))= 0.1017
2
\ As = 19635 mm
þ =(19635x100)/(3.14x0.25x1200^2)= 1.736 %
\ þ/fck = 0.0496
2
2
ηk = 0.0912 > 0.08
Dia of bar = 16 mm
2
2 2
ωwd = 0.2032
ωw,req = 0.066758176
ωw,min = 0.18
ωwd,c = 0.18
For ωwd = 0.18 ρw = 0.0064722
2
Hence OK


Ec = 5000 x √fck = 5000 x √35 = 29580.39892 N/mm² ≈ 29580.4 MN/m²
4 4
Ip= π / 64 x (1.2) = 0.10179 m
3
So, nh = 1.4 MN/m
T = 4.6399812 m
\ L1/T = 0

10

3 3
[Ref: IRC 78-2014, Cl No 709.3.5.2]

= δ.t c
\ þt = (100 x As)/(π/4 x d²) = 100x98.175/3.14x0.25x108.75^2= 1.057 %
\ tc = 0.74 N/mm²
2
Now, Pu = 72.81373 T = 72813.73 N Ag = π/4 x (1200)² = 1130973 mm
\δ= 1+((3x72813.7300000001)/(1130973.355x35))= 1.006
2
=0.74444x3.14x0.25x108.75^2x100 = 691.48 kN

\Pu/fckD²= ( (728.137x1000)/(x(mm2^2))= 0.0144
2
\ As = 19635 mm
þ =(19635x100)/(3.14x0.25xmm2^2)= 1.736 %
\ þ/fck = 0.0496
11
Pier-P 2 & P3
Ec = 29580.4 N/mm 2 Es = 200000 N/mm 2

1.5 x m = 10.14
Member forces

 Nd  0.5  D  Cos α
Cos     = 0.174
 0 .5  D 
Cos  
Nd  0.5  D Cos β = 0.195
r
Sin α = 0.985
Nd R
Sin β = 0.981
 d α = 1.3961 radians
R  β
N
 A
= 1.3750 radians
Sin 4α = -0.643
Sin 2α = 0.342
Sin 2β = 0.382

fs1 = 109.1 kg/cm 2
fs2 = 120.8 kg/cm 2
= 11.3 N/mm 2
< 16.8 N/mm 2 Safe
2
< 348 N/mm Safe
Pier-P 2 & P3
Ec = 29580.4 N/mm 2 Es = 200000 N/mm 2

1.5 x m = 10.14
Member forces

 Nd  0.5  D  Cos α
Cos     = 0.174
 0 .5  D 
Cos  
Nd  0.5  D Cos β = 0.195
r
Sin α = 0.985
Nd R
Sin β = 0.981
 d α = 1.3961 radians
R  β
N
 A
= 1.3750 radians
Sin 4α = -0.643
Sin 2α = 0.342
Sin 2β = 0.382

fs1 = 109.1 kg/cm 2
fs2 = 120.8 kg/cm 2
= 11.3 N/mm 2
< 16.8 N/mm 2 Safe
2
< 348 N/mm Safe
Load Calculation for Substructure of 30 m Single Span of Viaduct and Intermediate Pier No P8 & P9
Live Load:
8 12 12 17 17 17 17
3.96 1.52 2.13 1.37 3.05 1.37

(8x(1.37+3.05+1.37+2.13+1.52+3.96)))/(8+12+12+17+17+17+17) = 5.124 m
70 T
4.570
Class A
2.7 2.7 11.4 11.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8
1.1 3.2 1.2 4.3 3 3 3

(2.7x(3+3+3+4.3+1.2+3.2+1.1)))/(2.7+2.7+11.4+11.4+6.8+6.8+6.8+6.8) = 9.709 m

70R Wheeled Vehicle
No Other Vehicle
5.124
30 30
11.4 11.4 Class A
6.8 2.7 2.7
0.2 20
9.709
30 30
2.285
30 30
11.4 11.4 Class A
6.8 2.7 2.7
0.2 20
9.709
30 30

20.4 8.1 8.1 20
0.2
9.709
30 30

11.4x1.21x1.7]+ [(4.5/30)x3x11.4x1.21x1.7]+[(0.2/30)x3x6.8x1.21x1.7]= 265.93 T
1
Total Load = 385 T
6 9.5 9.5 18 18 18 1.23 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

3.2 1.37 5.389 1.5
0.27
30 30
2
Braking Force:
3 Lane of Class A

85.285 85.285 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.93
1.8 1.63 3.83 1.8
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
66.512 66.512 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.93
1.8 1.62 3.82 1.8
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32 44.32
0.5 1.80
1.8 0.4 1.70 1.7 1.80
1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

C/L of pier
7.80
2
Dead Load:


Pier cap
Width of col. = 2m
Depth of cap = 2m

2 2
[Ref: Revised Geotechnical Investigation report for Peoposed Construction of ROB at Marigaon, BH7]

(T) Braking(T-m)
543.9 837.389 65.89 318.41 81.4824 0 0 38.189

(T) Braking(T-m)
3

Mx
Pile X Z
1 2 3 1 -3.6 -3.6
2 -3.6 0
Z 3.6 3 -3.6 3.6
4 0 -3.6
4 5 6 Mz 5 0 0
6 0 3.6
3.6 7 3.6 -3.6
X 8 3.6 0
7 8 9 9 3.6 3.6
3.6 3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76
Min. Compression :
Reaction at P-1 = 1788.356/9+(248.32318x-3.6)/77.76+(335.284x-3.6)/77.76
= 171.687 T
Max. Compression :
Reaction at P-9 = 1794.42/9+(248.32318x3.6)/77.76+(335.284x3.6)/77.76
226.399 T
Net Reaction
Net Reaction at P1
(T) Min
Max


Seismic Load:


Pile cap
1200 mm Dia Pile
4


1200 mm Dia Pile
3

5

(T) SL(T-m) (T-m) rd)(+T) (T)
Mx
1 2 3
Z 3.6
4 5 6
X
3.6 3.6
7 8 9

Pile X Z
Now total, Mz = 67.057 T-m 3 -3.6 3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76 5 0 0
8 3.6 0
Reaction at P-1 = 1274.639/9+(2561.383x-3.6)/77.76+(67.057x-3.6)/77.76 9 3.6 3.6
= 19.94 T <

Reaction at P-9 = 1724.149/9+(2561.383x3.6)/77.76+(67.057x3.6)/77.76

= 313.259 T
HL for
(T)
Net
Net
force (T)
Max


6
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]
[ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]



3
Total wt of soil =(0-)x1.8x0.3= 38.189 T

(T) ward)(+T) (T)

(T) ward)(+T) (T)
7
Mx
1 2 3
Z
Mz
4 5 6
X 3.6
7 8 9

Pile X Z
Now total, Mz = 7.2 T-m 3 -3.6 3.6
∑ Z 2= 77.76 ∑ X 2= 77.76 5 0 0
Reaction at P-1 = 1222.962/9+(2434.539x-3.6)/77.76+(7.2x-3.6)/77.76 8 3.6 0
= 22.841 T 9 3.6 3.6
Reaction at P-9 = 1671.416/9+(2434.539x3.6)/77.76+(7.2x3.6)/77.76
= 298.756 T
HD for super&
HL for
(T)
(T)
Net
Net
force (T)
Max
DL of Super-structure, sub-structure, pile cap + 3-Class A -9.174 435.899 27.680


PSF for DL = 1.35

PSF for SIDL = 1.75
PSF for LL = 1.5
PSF for SL = 1.5
PSF for DL = 1
PSF for SIDL = 1.2
PSF for LL = 1
PSF for WL/SL = 1
8
2
2
2
2

Clear Cover = 50 mm


Ec = 5000 x √fck = 5000 x √35 = 29580.39892 N/mm² ≈ 29580.4 MN/m²
4 4
Ip= π / 64 x (1.2) = 0.10179 m
3
So, nh = 1.4 MN/m
T = 4.640 m
\ L1/T = 0


3 3
[Ref: IRC 78-2014, Cl No 709.3.5.2]

= δ.t c
\ þt = (100 x As)/(π/4 x d²) = 100x98.175/3.14x0.25x108.75^2= 1.057 %
\ tc = 0.74 N/mm²
2
Now, Pu = 519.65791 T = 519657.91 N Ag = π/4 x (1200)² = 1130973 mm
\δ= 1+((3x519657.91)/(1130973.355x35))= 1.039
2
9
=0.76886x3.14x0.25x108.75^2x100 = 714.16 kN

\Pu/fckD²= ( (5196.579x1000)/(35x(1200^2))= 0.1031
2
\ As = 19635 mm
þ =(19635x100)/(3.14x0.25x1200^2)= 1.736 %
\ þ/fck = 0.0496
2
2
ηk = 0.0925 > 0.08
Dia of bar = 16 mm
2
2 2
ωwd = 0.2032
ωw,req = 0.067324316
ωw,min = 0.18
ωwd,c = 0.18
For ωwd = 0.18 ρw = 0.0064722
2
Hence OK


Ec = 5000 x √fck = 5000 x √35 = 29580.39892 N/mm² ≈ 29580.4 MN/m²
4 4
Ip= π / 64 x (1.2) = 0.10179 m
3
So, nh = 1.4 MN/m
T = 4.6399812 m
\ L1/T = 0

10

3 3
[Ref: IRC 78-2014, Cl No 709.3.5.2]

= δ.t c
\ þt = (100 x As)/(π/4 x d²) = 100x98.175/3.14x0.25x108.75^2= 1.057 %
\ tc = 0.74 N/mm²
2
Now, Pu = 79.68091 T = 79680.91 N Ag = π/4 x (1200)² = 1130973 mm
\δ= 1+((3x79680.91)/(1130973.355x35))= 1.006
2
=0.74444x3.14x0.25x108.75^2x100 = 691.48 kN

\Pu/fckD²= ( (796.809x1000)/(x(mm2^2))= 0.0158
2
\ As = 19635 mm
þ =(19635x100)/(3.14x0.25xmm2^2)= 1.736 %
\ þ/fck = 0.0496
11
Pier- P 8 & P 9
Material parameters ( Max Compression )
Ec = 29580.4 N/mm 2 Es = 200000 N/mm 2

1.5 x m = 10.14
Member forces
Axial load on pile = 367.29 T = P = 367286.8 kg

 Nd  0.5  D  Cos α
Cos     = 0.174
 0 .5  D 
Cos  
Nd  0.5  D Cos β = 0.195
r
Sin α = 0.985
Nd R
Sin β = 0.981
 d α = 1.3961 radians
R  β
N
 A
= 1.3750 radians
Sin 4α = -0.643
Sin 2α = 0.342
Sin 2β = 0.382

fs1 = 110.6 kg/cm 2
fs2 = 120.8 kg/cm 2
= 11.3 N/mm 2
< 16.8 N/mm 2 Safe
2
< 348 N/mm Safe
Pier- P 8 & P 9
Material parameters ( Min Compression )
Ec = 29580.4 N/mm 2 Es = 200000 N/mm 2

1.5 x m = 10.14
Member forces
Axial load on pile = 72.50 T = P = 72503.6 kg

Effective depth of pile cross section d eff = 113.6 cm
 Nd  0.5  D  Cos α
Cos     = -0.243
 0 .5  D 
Cos  
Nd  0.5  D Cos β = -0.272
r
Sin α = 0.970
Nd R
Sin β = 0.962
 d α = 1.8160 radians
R  β
N
 A
= 1.8460 radians
Sin 4α = 0.831
Sin 2α = -0.471
Sin 2β = -0.523

fs1 = 55.1 kg/cm 2
fs2 = 133.7 kg/cm 2
= 9.3 N/mm 2
< 16.8 N/mm 2 Safe
2
< 348 N/mm Safe
NOTES ON LATERAL CAPACITY OF PILE CALCULATION.
Preloaded clay or Overconsolidated caly has always higher stress and value
of Unconfined Compressive strength - Cohesion is always higher
[Reference :Pile Design and Construction Practice-M.J.Tomlinson,]

Table 6.2 Relationship of modulus of subgrade reaction (k1) to untrained shearing strength of stiff
overconsolidated clay
Table 4 of Annexure C of IS2911 ( referred for preloaded caly) but the table given as general
clay property for Unconfined Compressive Strength and corresponding Modulus of Subgrade Recation
Note below Table 4 -NOTE —" For qu less than 25, k1 may be taken as zero,
which implies that there is no lateral resistance."
So in this case the cohesion is very low which can not be regarded as Preloaded Clay.
It may be noted that this soil in our case is C-Φ soil
It is also to be noted that long pile has very high resistance against yielding of soil due to infinite passive resistance.
[Reference :Pile Design and Construction Practice-M.J.Tomlinson,]
"Ultimate resistance of long piles
The passive resistance provided by the soil to the yielding of an infinitely long pile is infinite. Thus the ultimate lateral load
which can be carried by the pile is determined solely from the ultimate moment of resistance Mu of the pile shaft."

Design Calculation of Pile For NFR - ROB at Jagi Road

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design Calculation of Pile For NFR - ROB at Jagi Road

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DESIGN CALCULATION OF PILE

CONSTRUCTION OF R.O.B. AT KM 67/9 TO 68/0 IN

25N, Selimpur Road, Kolkata–700 031

DOCUMENT NO.: EISP/NFR-18/DC–01; Rev. – 01 Date: 13/12/2018

3.96 1.52 2.13 1.37 3.05 1.37

Load CG from rear end = ((17x1.37)+(17x(1.37+3.05))+(17(1.37x3.05+1.37))+(12x(1.37+3.05+1.37+2.13))+(12(1.37+3.05+1.37+2.13+1.52))+

1.1 3.2 1.2 4.3 3 3 3

Load CG from rear end = ((6.8x3)+(6.8x(3+3))+(6.8x(3+3+3))+(11.4x(3+3+3+4.3))+(11.4x(3+3+3+4.3+1.2))+(2.7x(3+3+3+4.3+1.2+3.2))+

Live Load Cases For Substructure Loading For 30 m Span

Case 2: 70 R Tracked Vehicle + 1 Lane of Class A

70 T 70R Tracked Vehicle

Case 3: 3 Lane of Class A

Total load for 3 Lane Class A = [(20.291/30)x3x55.4x1.21x1.7]+[(10/30)x3x2.7x1.21x1.7]+[(8.9/30)x3x2.7x1.21x1.7]+[(5.7/30)x3x

6 9.5 9.5 18 18 18 1.23 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

Max reaction at intermediate support = 271.61 T

Calculation of Transverse Eccentricity of Live Load:

1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

1.55 2.5 2.50 2.50

Hence the max transverse moment due to LL eccentricity, Mx = 248.323 T-m

Total SIDL = 65.89 T

Total Weight of Crash barrier =2x0.914x31.2= 57.03 T

Total Dead Load for superstructure = 543.9 T 15.6

Dead Load for Substructure:

Total weight of pile cap =9x9x2x2.5= 405 T

VD for sub- MXe for LL Vb for

VD for sub- MXe for LL Vb for

Max vertical Load = 1794.420 T Min vertical Load = 1788.4

Reaction for Dead Load of super & sub-structure = 1381.299/9= 157.721 T

Reaction for Dead Load of super & sub-structure = 1381.299/9= 157.721 T

So, Horizontal seismic coefficient,Ah=(0.36/2)x1.2x2.5/3= 0.18

Horizontal force during Seismic for LL =0.18x53.315 = 9.597 T

Live Load Component:(70R(T)+Class A) [ As per IRC 6:2017 Cl No. 219.5.2]

Horizontal force during Seismic for LL =0.18x45.999 = 8.280 T

VL for MX for LL ML for Vb for VS for

VL for MX for LL ML for Vb for VS for

Max vertical Load = 1724.149 T Min vertical Load = 1274.6 T

3.6 3.6 CG of pile cap is at the location of P5 pile

Max. Compression during Seismic:

Reaction at P-9 = 1724.149/9+(2561.383x3.6)/77.76+(67.057x3.6)/77.76

Max horizontal force = 266.49 T

Reaction for Dead Load of super & sub-structure = 153.478 T

Reaction for Dead Load of super & sub-structure = 153.478 T

Dead Load Component:

Total horizontal shear at cap during SL =31.356+35.1+97.9= 237.26 T

Vertical load for DL of pile cap = 405.00 T

VL for Vb for VS for

VL for Vb for VS for

Max vertical Load = 1671.416 T Min vertical Load = 1223.0 T

3.6 3.6 CG of pile cap is at the location of P5 pile

Max horizontal force = 249.12 T

Reaction for Dead Load of super & sub-structure = 153.478 T

Reaction for Dead Load of super & sub-structure = 153.478 T

PSF for DL = 1.35

fck = 35 Mpa ftk = 500 Mpa

Critical Load Combination: Seismic Combination:

Calculation of depth of fixity of of Pile: As Per ANNEX-C IS:2911-2010 Part-I/Sec-2

Provide, 20 no. Of 25 mm bar upto termination level

Calculation of Horizontal Deflection of Pile: [ Ref: IS 2911-2010]

Depth of fixity, zf = 10.3 m

Shear Check of Pile:

Unfactored shear capacity of pile = 476.5667 kN > 296.1 kN