Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
The SRFL domain focuses on the ideal that teachers serve as positive and powerful
role models of the value in the pursuit of different efforts to learn. The teacher’s action,
statements, and different types of social interactions with students exemplify this ideal.
The DOL domain emphasizes the ideal that teachers can facilitate the learning
process even with diverse learners, by recognizing and respecting individual
differences and by using knowledge about their differences to design diverse sets of
learning activities to ensure that all learners can attain the desired learning goals.
The curriculum domain refers to all elements of the teaching-learning process that
work in convergence to help students understand the curricular goals and objectives,
and to attain high standards of learning defined in the curriculum. These elements
include the teacher’s knowledge of subject matter and the learning process, teaching-
learning approaches and activities, instructional materials and learning resources.
The LC domain refers to the ideal that classroom activities are meaningfully linked to
the experiences and aspirations of the learners in their homes and communities. Thus,
this domain focuses on teachers’ efforts directed at strengthening the links between
schools and communities to help in the attainment of the curricular goals.
The PGPD domain emphasizes the ideal that teachers value having a high personal
regard for the teaching profession, concern for professional development, and
continuous improvement as teachers.
Analysis
The NCBTS gives an emphasis on the consideration of teachers to the needs of the
learners in designing academic programs. The teachers are necessitated to regard
students’ diversity and the provision of a proper learning environment as major
concerns. This would include the need for teachers in the Philippines to be well-
knowledgeable on the different teaching and learning strategies and the correct way
of facilitating learning. In this set of standards, it is noted that the roles of teachers in
the educational setting include continuous academic growth, curriculum developers,
field experts, and examples of good ideals. NCBTS also emphasizes the functions of
assessment in the teaching and learning process such as the alignment of activities
to instructional objectives, a ground for redefining pedagogies, and the need to report
students’ performance to properly measure their academic achievement. With regard
to content, the NCBTS has no concrete provision of academic standards applicable
solely in the national setting.
The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers defines teacher quality in the
Philippines. The standards describe the expectations of teachers’ increasing levels of
knowledge, practice and professional engagement. At the same time, the standards
allow for teachers’ growing understanding, applied with increasing sophistication
across a broader and more complex range of teaching/learning situations.
Domain 2 highlights the role of teachers to provide learning environments that are
safe, secure, fair and supportive in order to promote learner responsibility and
achievement. This Domain centers on creating an environment that is learning-
focused and in which teachers efficiently manage learner behavior in a physical and
virtual space. It highlights the need for teachers to utilize a range of resources and
provide intellectually challenging and stimulating activities to encourage constructive
classroom interactions geared towards the attainment of high standards of learning.
Analysis
The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers, which is built on NCBTS,
complements the reform initiatives on teacher quality from pre-service education to in-
service training. It articulates what constitutes teacher quality in the K to 12 Reform
through well-defined domains, strands, and indicators that provide measures of
professional learning, competent practice, and effective engagement. This set of
standards makes explicit what teachers should know, be able to do and value to
achieve competence, improved student learning outcomes, and eventually quality
education. It is founded on teaching philosophies of learner-centeredness, lifelong
learning, and inclusivity/inclusiveness, among others. The professional standards,
therefore, become a public statement of professional accountability that can help
teachers reflect on and assess their own practices as they aspire for personal growth
and professional development.
Similarities
The two national teacher standards of the Philippines elicit the importance for our
teachers to achieve proper academic attainments and become credible experts in the
field. However, they emphasized that teachers should not only be knowledgeable on
content, but should also be creative in designing and implementing instruction. This
includes the need for them to properly align instruction with students’ needs,
appropriate administration of assessment, and the provision of an environment
favourable for learning. The two standards also say that for learning to be
transformative, the curriculum should also be brought outside the four walls of the
classroom. This will only be possible through community linkages and cooperation
with stakeholders.
Differences
The standards are not guided by one interact with the national and local
unique standard that could serve as a curriculum requirements. They translate
general theme for all processes. Thus, curriculum content into learning activities
the teachers are given freedom to select that are relevant to learners and based
content, activities, and strategies. Each on the principles of effective teaching
school could also have a unique and learning.
standard apart from other schools within
the country.
Nutshell
The teachers, the graduates, and the preservice teachers of the Philippines and
Arizona have different natures due to the uniqueness among their international teacher
standards. One may be advantageous on one aspect while the other is advantageous
also in another. However, what matters most importantly is the relevance of these
standards to their needs and how they can produce dynamic professionals who can
respond to the demands of the society they live in.
Sources: