Professional Documents
Culture Documents
* Part of Ph.D. thesis submitted by the first author to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580005, India
25
Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.,25 (1) : 2012
Table 1. Growth parameters of stevia at harvest as influenced by irrigation schedule and planting geometry
*Treatment Plant height at harvest (cm) Number of branches plant -1 Number of leaves plant -1
2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled
Nitrogen levels (N)
N1 (200 kg ha-1) 50.6 48.5 49.6 39.9 47.7 43.8 728.8 772.0 750.4
N2 (300 kg ha-1) 55.2 53.6 54.4 46.5 54.7 50.2 805.0 844.2 824.6
N3 (400 kg ha-1) 57.9 56.0 57.0 48.5 56.5 52.5 825.2 870.1 847.7
S.Em.± 0.91 0.92 0.94 0.53 0.73 0.85 11.95 13.35 12.55
C.D. (P=0.05) 2.63 2.65 2.72 1.54 2.12 2.46 34.35 38.37 36.08
Phosphorous levels (P)
P1 (100 kg ha-1) 51.9 50.4 51.20 41.9 50.2 46.1 740.7 783.5 762.1
P2 (150 kg ha-1) 54.8 52.6 53.7 45.2 53.3 49.3 794.7 839.3 817.0
P3 (200 kg ha-1) 57.0 55.1 56.1 47.8 55.3 51.1 823.4 863.4 843.4
S.Em.± 0.91 0.92 0.94 0.53 0.73 0.85 11.95 13.35 12.55
C.D. (P=0.05) 2.63 2.65 2.72 1.54 2.12 2.46 34.35 38.37 36.08
Potassium levels (K)
K1 (100 kg ha-1) 53.9 52.1 52.9 44.3 52.3 48.1 776.7 820.9 798.8
K2 (200 kg ha-1) 55.3 53.4 54.3 45.7 53.6 49.5 795.9 836.5 816.2
S.Em.± 0.74 0.61 0.64 0.44 0.60 0.54 9.76 10.90 10.25
C.D. (P=0.05) NS NS NS 1.26 NS NS NS NS NS
Absolute control 40.5 36.6 38.6 24.3 21.9 23.1 319.8 307.9 313.8
Control v/s Treatment
S.Em.± 2.26 1.83 1.93 1.28 1.77 1.60 28.62 31.81 29.96
C.D. (P=0.05) 6.49 5.25 5.54 3.69 5.10 4.60 82.10 91.22 85.94
All interactions NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
2004-05 : average of first five cuttings 2005-06 : average of next consecutive five cuttings Pooled : Average of 1 to 10 cuttings
NS: Non significant
* N, P and K doses applied for five cuttings (Crops) in equal splits
26
Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels on growth and....
followed by K1 i.e., 100 kg ha-1 (52.9 cm, 48.1 and 798.8 respectively were significantly influenced by varied levels of nitrogen and
). Absolute control with out any nutrients recorded significantly phosphorous but not with potassium levels in pooled data.
lowest plant height (38.6 cm), least number of branches (23.1) Highest fresh biomass yield (91.9 t ha-1), fresh leaf yield (47.45 t ha-1)
and leaves plant-1 (313.8). All the interaction effects between N, and dry leaf yield (11.42 t ha-1) were posible with nitrogen level
P and K had no significant influence on the plant height, number of N3 i.e., 400 kg ha-1which was on par with N2 i.e., 300 kg ha-1
of branches and leaves plant-1 in pooled data (Table 1). Plant and both were superior over N1. Phosphorus level P3 (200 kg ha-1)
height at harvest was significantly influenced by higher levels recorded the highest fresh biomass (89.87 t ha-1), fresh leaf
of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium which in turn were yield (46.17 t ha-1) and dry leaf yield (11.14 t ha-1) which were
responsible for higher number of branches plant-1 and number on par with P 2 i.e., 150 kg ha -1 (86.61 t ha -1, 44. 93 t ha -1,
of leaves plant-1 resulting into higher leaf yield. The results are 10.85 t ha -1 respectively), but superior to P1. Higher fresh
in accordance with the findings of Chalapathi et al. (1999), who biomass, fresh leaf yield and dry leaf yield of stevia with higher
also reported increased plant height and number of branches N, P, and K nutrient levels could be attributed to more number
plant-1 with nutrient levels of 40:30:45 kg NPK ha-1 in sandy of branches and leaves plant-1 of stevia due to higher plant
loam soils at Bangalore. But different potassium levels did not height. Different potassium levels did not influence these
influence the total dry leaf yield significantly. These growth parameters of stevia significantly. Significantly lower fresh
parameters might have possibly contributed positively to the biomass (35.04 t ha-1) dry leaf yield of 4.23 t ha-1 was obtained
higher leaf yield with higher N, P and K application. Kawatani et with the absolute control as against all other treatments applied
al. (1980) at Japan had also reported the increased number of with nutrients (Table 2), due to the lowest number of branches
branches and leaves plant-1 of stevia with higher nitrogen and leaves plant-1. Murayama et al. (1980) in Japan also
nutrition and also reported positive response to higher levels of experimentally proved that no manuring resulted in lowest
potassium application. Increased number of leaves plant-1 with leaf yield of stevia. Increased dry leaf yield was also reported
increased levels of N, P and K fertilizers was also reported by by Shock (1982a) in Japan with moderate application of
Buana and Goenadi (1985) in Brazil. nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. He also reported lower
The cumulative fresh biomass yield, fresh leaf yield and dry leaf yield ( 42.39 q ha-1) with absolute control without
dry leaf yield of stevia recorded during the first year, second any fertilizer, which was 62 and 63 per cent less as compared
year and pooled is presented in Table 2. These parameters to higher levels of nitrogen and phosphorous. Research
Table 2. Fresh biomass, fresh leaf and dry leaf yield of stevia as influenced by different nutrient levels
*Treatment Fresh biomass yield(t ha-1) Fresh leaf yield (t ha-1) Dry leaf yield (t ha-1)
2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled
Nitrogen levels (N)
N1 (200 kg ha-1) 72.59 79.14 75.87 38.29 40.09 39.19 9.24 9.76 9.50
N2 (300 kg ha-1) 84.07 91.61 87.84 43.96 46.86 45.41 10.66 11.22 10.94
N3 (400 kg ha-1) 87.25 96.56 91.90 45.72 49.18 47.45 11.12 11.72 11.42
S.Em.± 1.37 1.09 1.48 0.78 0.83 0.74 0.23 0.18 0.19
C.D.(P=0.05) 3.95 3.13 4.28 2.25 2.40 2.14 0.65 0.53 0.53
Phosphorous levels (P)
P1 (100 kg ha-1) 76.47 81.79 79.13 40.18 41.72 40.95 9.68 10.06 9.87
P2 (150 kg ha-1) 82.04 91.17 86.61 43.19 46.67 44.93 10.52 11.18 10.85
P3 (200 kg ha-1) 85.04 94.35 89.87 44.60 47.73 46.17 10.83 11.46 11.14
S.Em± 1.37 1.09 1.48 0.78 0.83 0.74 0.23 0.18 0.19
C.D.(P=0.05) 3.95 3.13 4.28 2.25 2.40 2.14 0.65 0.53 0.53
Potassium levels (K)
K1 (100 kg ha-1) 80.22 87.48 83.85 42.08 44.70 43.39 10.19 10.73 10.78
K2 (200 kg ha-1) 82.39 90.73 86.56 43.23 46.05 44.64 10.49 11.07 10.46
S.Em.± 1.12 0.89 2.01 0.63 0.59 0.57 0.19 0.13 0.15
C.D.(P=0.05) NS 2.56 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Absolute control 36.61 33.48 35.04 17.14 14.86 16.00 4.70 3.76 4.23
Control v/s Treatment
S.Em.± 3.29 2.61 2.76 1.87 1.73 1.67 0.54 0.39 0.44
C.D.(P=0.05) 9.45 7.5 7.92 5.37 4.97 4.79 1.55 1.12 1.27
All interactions NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
2004-05: average of first five cuttings 2005-06: average of next consecutive five cuttings Pooled : Average of 1 to 10 cuttings
NS: Non significant
* N, P and K doses applied for five cuttings (Crops) in equal splits
27
Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.,25 (1) : 2012
conducted at Egypt also showed a significant increase in dry with a selling rate of ` 200 kg-1 dried leaves of stevia. In Canada,
leaf biomass yields of stevia when nitrogen fertilizer was it was reported that a leaf yield of 2200 kg ha-1 amounts to the
increased from 10 to 30 kg N ha-1 wherein the dry leaves yield cost of production of $ 8500, with a price of $ 3.85 kg-1 dried
increased by 64 per cent compared to lower dose (Allam leaves (Colombus, 1997). Megeji et al. ( 2005) at Palampur also
et al., 2001). In conformity of these findings growth and yield reported a total net returns of ` 3.75 lakhs for four years with an
of stevia increased significantly with increasing rates of N, P average annual income of ` 0.93 lakhs ha-1 at a sale price of `
and K up to 60:30:45 kg ha-1 per crop with the highest dry leaf 100 kg-1 dried leaves, with a benefit cost ratio of 1.89. In pooled
yield which was on par with 40:20:30 kg ha-1 per crop in sandy data nitrogen level of 400 kg ha-1 (N2) recorded the highest B:C
loam soils at Bangalore (Chalapathi et al., 1999b). Interaction (3.01) which was on par with nitrogen level of N2 i.e., 300 kg ha-1
effects of nutrient levels on dry leaf yield were not significant. (2.93), but significantly higher than N1 i.e., 200 kg ha-1 (2.66).
Economics of stevia cultivation as influenced by different Higher level of phosphorous P3 i.e., 200 kg ha-1 resulted in higher
levels of nutrients is presented in Table 3. In pooled data N3 i.e., B:C (2.96) which was on par with P2 i.e., 150 kg ha-1 (2.91).
400 kg ha-1 recorded a net returns of ` 7,62,615 ha-1 which was Potassium level influenced the B:C non-significantly. Significantly
on par with N2 i.e., 300 kg ha-1 (` 7,20,780 ha-1). Higher lower B:C was recorded with absolute control in pooled data
phosphorus level P3 i.e., 200 kg ha-1 recorded the highest net (1.44). However, the interaction effects proved to be non-
returns (` 7,37,880 ha-1) which was on par with P2 i.e., 150 kg significant.
ha-1 (` 7,12,680 ha-1). Higher levels of potassium K2 i.e., 200 kg Stevia responded significantly up to 300:150:100 kg ha-1 NPK
ha-1 recorded the net returns (` 7,05,905 ha-1) comparable with wherein five cuttings were possible in a year. As all interactions
K1 i.e., 100 kg ha-1 (` 6,78,015 ha-1) in pooled data. Absolute are non significant, based on the main factors effect and
control recorded significantly lower net returns of ` 2,59,064 ha-1 economics, the combination of N2P2K1 i.e., 300:150:100 kg ha-1
as compared to rest of the treatments (Table 3). Barathi (2003) at for a total of five crops in a year has been considered as the
Coimbatore reported a total net profit of about ` 1.8 lakhs acre- economically optimum level of nutrients for stevia in medium
1
during first year and ` 4.5 lakhs acre-1 during subsequent years black soil under irrigation.
28
Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels on growth and....
References
Allam, A. I., Nassar, A. M. and Besheit, S. Y., 2001. nile.enal.sci.eg/ Chalapathi, M. V., Timmegowda. S., Rama Krishna Prama, V. and Prasad. T.
G., 1997b, Natural non calorie sweetener stevia (Stevia rebaudiana
Arc Journal/uga.htm.
Bertoni): A future crop of India. Crop Res., 14 : 347-350.
Barathi, N., 2003, Stevia- The calorie free natural sweetener. Natural
Colombus, M., 1997, The Cultivation of Stevia, "Natures Sweetener",
Product Radiance 2., pp. 120-122. QMAFRA : Ontaria Canada. P.4.
Brandle, J. E. and Rosa, N., 1992, Heritability for yield, leaf: stem ratio Kawatani, T., Kaneki, Y. and Tanabe, T. and Takahashi, T., 1980, On
and stevioside content estimated from a landrace cultivar of cultivation of Kaa-He-E (Stevia rebaudiana Bert).VI. Response
Stevia rebaudiana. Canadian J. Plant Sci., 72 : 1263-1266. of stevia to potassium fertilization rates and to the three major
elements of fertilizer. Nettai Nogyo 24, 105-112.
Buana, L. and Goenadi, D.H., 1985, A study on the correlation between
growth and yield of stevia. Menara Perkebunan, 53 : 68-71. Megeji, N. W., Kumar, J. K., Virendra Singh, Kaul, V. K. and Ahuja, P.
S., 2005, Introducing Stevia rebaudiana, a natural zero-calorie
Chalapathi, M. V., Timmegowda. S. Rama Krishna Prama, V. and Prasad. sweetener. Curr. Sci., 88 (5) : 801-804.
T. G., 1997b, Natural non calorie sweetener stevia (Stevia
Murayama, S., Rayano, R., Miyazato, K. and Nose, A., 1980, Studies on
rebaudiana Bertoni): A future crop of India. Crop Res., 14 : the cultivation of Stevia rebaudiana. Effects of fertilizers, planting
347-350. density and seedling clones on growth and yield. Science Bulletin
Chalapathi, M. V., Kumar, N. D., Rao, G. G. E. and Jayaramaiah, R., of the College of Agriculture, Univ., Ryakyus, Okinawa, 27 : 1-8.
1999, Comparative performance of plant and ratoon crops of Shock, C. C., 1982a, Experimental cultivation of Rebaudis Stevia in
stevia. Indian Agril., 43 : 211-212 California. Agron. Prog. Rep., 122 : 250-258.
29