You are on page 1of 5

Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.

,25 (1) : (25-29) 2012


Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels on growth and yield
of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni.)*

Y. R. ALADAKATTI, Y. B PALLED, M. B. CHETTI, S. I. HALIKATTI, S. C. ALAGUNDAGI, P. L. PATIL,


V. C. PATIL1 AND A. D. JANAWADE

Department of Agronomy, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580005, India


1
Precision Agriculture Research Chair, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Email: yraladakatti@rediffmail.com

(Received: August, 2011 ; Accepted : March, 2012)


Abstract: A field experiment was conducted in medium black, clayey soil under irrigated conditions to assess the response of
stevia to levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Five cuttings (crops) were taken in a year. Pooled results indicated
that significantly higher dry leaf yield was obtained with nitrogen @ 400 kg ha-1 (11.42 t ha-1 ) and it was on par with 300 kg
ha-1 (10.94 t ha-1 ). Phosphorus @ 200 kg ha-1 recorded significantly highest dry leaf yield (11.14 t ha-1 ) and it was on par with
150 kg ha-1 (10.85 t ha-1). Potassium @ 200 kg ha-1 recorded dry leaf yield of 10.78 t ha-1 and it was comparable with
potassium @100 kg ha-1 (10.46 t ha-1 ). The growth parameters viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1 and number of
leaves plant-1 were significantly higher with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium @ 400 kg ha-1, 200 kg ha-1 and 200 kg ha-1,
respectively which were on par with 300 kg ha-1, 150 kg ha-1 and 100 kg ha-1 respectively. In pooled data nitrogen @ 400 kg
ha-1 (N2) recorded the highest B:C (3.01) which was on par with nitrogen @ N2 i.e., 300 kg ha-1 (2.93), but significantly higher
than N1 i.e., 200 kg ha-1 (2.66). Phosphorous P3 i.e., 200 kg ha-1 resulted in higher B:C (2.96) which was on par with P2 i.e.,
150 kg ha-1 (2.91). Potassium level influenced the B:C non-significantly. Significantly lowest B:C were recorded with
absolute control in pooled data (2.14). Interactions of N, P and K were non-significant. Nutrient level of 300:150:100 kg ha-1
NPK applied in equal splits to five cuttings (Crops) in year has been considered as an economically optimum level of
nutrients for stevia.
Key words: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, Stevia, Uptake

undertaken to determine the optimum N, P and K levels for


Introduction
higher dry leaf yield of stevia.
Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni.) is a herbaceous
Material and methods
perennial small bush contaning carbohydrate based
compounds in its leaves, which are many times sweeter than A field experiment was conducted at Water Management
cane sugar and sugarbeet. Dry leaves are the economic part in Research Center (WMRC), Belavatagi, (Ta: Navalagund, Dist:
stevia plant. Stevia leaves have taste 20-30 times sweeter than Dharwad) under irrigated conditions during 2004-05 to 2005-06.
cane sugar but impotantly without any calories. Hence, stevia It is located in semi-arid tract of Karnataka at 15o 34' N latitude
is a potential natural source of no calorie sweetner, alternative and 75o 21' E longitude at an altitude of 578 m above mean sea
to the synthetic sweetening agents like saccharine, aspartame, level. The soil of the experimental site was medium black, clayey
asulfam-K that are available in the market to the diet conscious soil (Vertisols) with a depth of more than 1.5 m having high
consumers and diabetics. Cultivation of stevia crop made water holding capacity (78 %) and low infiltration rate
significant impact in the countries like Japan, China, Korea, (0.25 cm ha -1) The pH and Ec of the soil was 8.1 and 0.23
Mexico, USA, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia, dSm -1 respectively, with organic carban of 0.64%, available N,
Canada and Russia (Brandel and Rosa, 1992). Studies P2O5 and K2O were 285 kg ha-1, 26 kg ha-1 and 620 kg ha-1
conducted in India so far could suggest only few management respectively. The initial composite soil samples from both the
approaches for improving productivity. Since the production sites were collected from 0 to 30 cm soil depth before
potential of stevia in India is 2-3 t ha-1 of dry leaves as against commencement of the experiment. The experiment consisted
1-2 t ha-1 in China, it has definite advantage over China of 3 levels of nitrogen ( N1 - 200 kg ha -1, N 2 - 300 kg ha -1,
(Chalapathi et al., 1997 b). Stevia can be cultivated profitably N3 - 400 kg ha--1), 3 levels of phosphorous ( P1 - 100 kg ha-1,
wherever irrigation facilities are available. In India some P 2 - 150 kg ha-1, P 3 - 200 kg ha -1), and 2 levels of potassium
research work was carried out at University of Agricultural ( K1 - 100 kg ha-1, K2 - 200 kg ha-1). All nutrients in each treatment
Sciences, Bengaluru in Karnataka and at the Institute of were applied in equal splits for five cuttings (Crops) in a year
Himalayan Bioresource Technology (IHBT), Palampur, including plant crop. The treatments were laid out in randomized
Himachal Pradesh during 1996 and 2003, respectively (Megeji block design with factorial concept in three replications and
et al., 2005). There is no adequate information on nutrient one absolute control with out any nutrients as check. Two
requirement for stevia. The present investigation was months old stevia seedlings were planted with a common spacing

* Part of Ph.D. thesis submitted by the first author to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580005, India
25
Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.,25 (1) : 2012

of 30 cm x 30 cm on 24th June, 2004. A common dose of FYM Results and discussion


@10 t ha-1 was applied to all treatments before planting. The The mean data on plant height, number of branches and
nutrients N, P and K were applied in the form of di-ammonium leaves plant-1 are presented in Table 1. The pooled data revealed
phosphate (DAP), urea and muriate of potash (MOP), that the increase in nitrogen levels from 200 kg ha-1 (N1) to 400
respectively. Entire P and K , fertilizers and 50 per cent N kg ha-1 (N3) increased the plant height, number of branches and
were applied a week after transplanting. Remaining 50 per leaves plant-1 progressively. N3 i.e., 400 kg ha-1 recorded
cent N was applied in three equal splits at 30, 45 and 60 days significantly higher plant height (57.00 cm), maximum number
after transplanting (DAT) for plant crop. But for the of branches plant-1 (52.5) and maximum number of leaves plant-1
subsequent ratoon crops entire P and K nutrients along with (847.7) in pooled data, closely followed by N2 i.e., 300 kg ha-1
50 per cent N was applied two days after harvest and the (54.41 cm, 50.16 and 824.5 respectively). The nitrogen level of
remaining 50 per cent N was top dressed in two equal splits at 200 kg ha-1 (N1) recorded lower plant height (49.58 cm), less
number of branches plant-1 (43.8), and less number of leaves
30 and 45 days of harvest of previous crop. This was followed
plant-1 (750.4) at harvest in pooled data. Increase in phosphorus
and maintained for each cutting throughout the crop season
levels also increased the plant height, number of branches and
during both the years. The plots were irrigated at 1.0 IW/CPE leaves plant-1 in pooled data, but phosphorus level P2 (150 kg ha-1)
ratio to a depth of 60 cm in each irrigation. First crop was recorded the plant height, number of branches plant-1, and
harvested at 90 days after planting, whereas the succeeding number of leaves plant-1 of 53.72 cm, 49.3 and 817 respectively,
crops were harvested at a regular interval of 70 days. The plants which were on par with these parameters recorded with P3 i.e.,
were cut uniformly 10 cm above the ground level and the green 200 kg ha-1 (56.1 cm, 51.1 and 843.4) in pooled data. Levels of
biomass was sun dried for a day, then shade dried for a week. potassium did not influence the plant height, number of branches
The dried stevia leaves were stripped off from the stem and plant-1, and leaves plant-1 at harvest significantly. However,
dried separately under sunlight for a day and stored in clean pooled data revealed that potassium level of K2 (200 kg ha-1)
gunny bags. Totally five cuttings (Crops) per year were taken recorded the higher plant height (54.3 cm), more number of
and the plots were maintained for two years. branches and leaves plant-1 ( 49.5 and 816.2 respectively), closely

Table 1. Growth parameters of stevia at harvest as influenced by irrigation schedule and planting geometry
*Treatment Plant height at harvest (cm) Number of branches plant -1 Number of leaves plant -1
2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled
Nitrogen levels (N)
N1 (200 kg ha-1) 50.6 48.5 49.6 39.9 47.7 43.8 728.8 772.0 750.4
N2 (300 kg ha-1) 55.2 53.6 54.4 46.5 54.7 50.2 805.0 844.2 824.6
N3 (400 kg ha-1) 57.9 56.0 57.0 48.5 56.5 52.5 825.2 870.1 847.7
S.Em.± 0.91 0.92 0.94 0.53 0.73 0.85 11.95 13.35 12.55
C.D. (P=0.05) 2.63 2.65 2.72 1.54 2.12 2.46 34.35 38.37 36.08
Phosphorous levels (P)
P1 (100 kg ha-1) 51.9 50.4 51.20 41.9 50.2 46.1 740.7 783.5 762.1
P2 (150 kg ha-1) 54.8 52.6 53.7 45.2 53.3 49.3 794.7 839.3 817.0
P3 (200 kg ha-1) 57.0 55.1 56.1 47.8 55.3 51.1 823.4 863.4 843.4
S.Em.± 0.91 0.92 0.94 0.53 0.73 0.85 11.95 13.35 12.55
C.D. (P=0.05) 2.63 2.65 2.72 1.54 2.12 2.46 34.35 38.37 36.08
Potassium levels (K)
K1 (100 kg ha-1) 53.9 52.1 52.9 44.3 52.3 48.1 776.7 820.9 798.8
K2 (200 kg ha-1) 55.3 53.4 54.3 45.7 53.6 49.5 795.9 836.5 816.2
S.Em.± 0.74 0.61 0.64 0.44 0.60 0.54 9.76 10.90 10.25
C.D. (P=0.05) NS NS NS 1.26 NS NS NS NS NS
Absolute control 40.5 36.6 38.6 24.3 21.9 23.1 319.8 307.9 313.8
Control v/s Treatment
S.Em.± 2.26 1.83 1.93 1.28 1.77 1.60 28.62 31.81 29.96
C.D. (P=0.05) 6.49 5.25 5.54 3.69 5.10 4.60 82.10 91.22 85.94
All interactions NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
2004-05 : average of first five cuttings 2005-06 : average of next consecutive five cuttings Pooled : Average of 1 to 10 cuttings
NS: Non significant
* N, P and K doses applied for five cuttings (Crops) in equal splits

26
Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels on growth and....

followed by K1 i.e., 100 kg ha-1 (52.9 cm, 48.1 and 798.8 respectively were significantly influenced by varied levels of nitrogen and
). Absolute control with out any nutrients recorded significantly phosphorous but not with potassium levels in pooled data.
lowest plant height (38.6 cm), least number of branches (23.1) Highest fresh biomass yield (91.9 t ha-1), fresh leaf yield (47.45 t ha-1)
and leaves plant-1 (313.8). All the interaction effects between N, and dry leaf yield (11.42 t ha-1) were posible with nitrogen level
P and K had no significant influence on the plant height, number of N3 i.e., 400 kg ha-1which was on par with N2 i.e., 300 kg ha-1
of branches and leaves plant-1 in pooled data (Table 1). Plant and both were superior over N1. Phosphorus level P3 (200 kg ha-1)
height at harvest was significantly influenced by higher levels recorded the highest fresh biomass (89.87 t ha-1), fresh leaf
of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium which in turn were yield (46.17 t ha-1) and dry leaf yield (11.14 t ha-1) which were
responsible for higher number of branches plant-1 and number on par with P 2 i.e., 150 kg ha -1 (86.61 t ha -1, 44. 93 t ha -1,
of leaves plant-1 resulting into higher leaf yield. The results are 10.85 t ha -1 respectively), but superior to P1. Higher fresh
in accordance with the findings of Chalapathi et al. (1999), who biomass, fresh leaf yield and dry leaf yield of stevia with higher
also reported increased plant height and number of branches N, P, and K nutrient levels could be attributed to more number
plant-1 with nutrient levels of 40:30:45 kg NPK ha-1 in sandy of branches and leaves plant-1 of stevia due to higher plant
loam soils at Bangalore. But different potassium levels did not height. Different potassium levels did not influence these
influence the total dry leaf yield significantly. These growth parameters of stevia significantly. Significantly lower fresh
parameters might have possibly contributed positively to the biomass (35.04 t ha-1) dry leaf yield of 4.23 t ha-1 was obtained
higher leaf yield with higher N, P and K application. Kawatani et with the absolute control as against all other treatments applied
al. (1980) at Japan had also reported the increased number of with nutrients (Table 2), due to the lowest number of branches
branches and leaves plant-1 of stevia with higher nitrogen and leaves plant-1. Murayama et al. (1980) in Japan also
nutrition and also reported positive response to higher levels of experimentally proved that no manuring resulted in lowest
potassium application. Increased number of leaves plant-1 with leaf yield of stevia. Increased dry leaf yield was also reported
increased levels of N, P and K fertilizers was also reported by by Shock (1982a) in Japan with moderate application of
Buana and Goenadi (1985) in Brazil. nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. He also reported lower
The cumulative fresh biomass yield, fresh leaf yield and dry leaf yield ( 42.39 q ha-1) with absolute control without
dry leaf yield of stevia recorded during the first year, second any fertilizer, which was 62 and 63 per cent less as compared
year and pooled is presented in Table 2. These parameters to higher levels of nitrogen and phosphorous. Research

Table 2. Fresh biomass, fresh leaf and dry leaf yield of stevia as influenced by different nutrient levels
*Treatment Fresh biomass yield(t ha-1) Fresh leaf yield (t ha-1) Dry leaf yield (t ha-1)
2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled
Nitrogen levels (N)
N1 (200 kg ha-1) 72.59 79.14 75.87 38.29 40.09 39.19 9.24 9.76 9.50
N2 (300 kg ha-1) 84.07 91.61 87.84 43.96 46.86 45.41 10.66 11.22 10.94
N3 (400 kg ha-1) 87.25 96.56 91.90 45.72 49.18 47.45 11.12 11.72 11.42
S.Em.± 1.37 1.09 1.48 0.78 0.83 0.74 0.23 0.18 0.19
C.D.(P=0.05) 3.95 3.13 4.28 2.25 2.40 2.14 0.65 0.53 0.53
Phosphorous levels (P)
P1 (100 kg ha-1) 76.47 81.79 79.13 40.18 41.72 40.95 9.68 10.06 9.87
P2 (150 kg ha-1) 82.04 91.17 86.61 43.19 46.67 44.93 10.52 11.18 10.85
P3 (200 kg ha-1) 85.04 94.35 89.87 44.60 47.73 46.17 10.83 11.46 11.14
S.Em± 1.37 1.09 1.48 0.78 0.83 0.74 0.23 0.18 0.19
C.D.(P=0.05) 3.95 3.13 4.28 2.25 2.40 2.14 0.65 0.53 0.53
Potassium levels (K)
K1 (100 kg ha-1) 80.22 87.48 83.85 42.08 44.70 43.39 10.19 10.73 10.78
K2 (200 kg ha-1) 82.39 90.73 86.56 43.23 46.05 44.64 10.49 11.07 10.46
S.Em.± 1.12 0.89 2.01 0.63 0.59 0.57 0.19 0.13 0.15
C.D.(P=0.05) NS 2.56 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Absolute control 36.61 33.48 35.04 17.14 14.86 16.00 4.70 3.76 4.23
Control v/s Treatment
S.Em.± 3.29 2.61 2.76 1.87 1.73 1.67 0.54 0.39 0.44
C.D.(P=0.05) 9.45 7.5 7.92 5.37 4.97 4.79 1.55 1.12 1.27
All interactions NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
2004-05: average of first five cuttings 2005-06: average of next consecutive five cuttings Pooled : Average of 1 to 10 cuttings
NS: Non significant
* N, P and K doses applied for five cuttings (Crops) in equal splits
27
Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.,25 (1) : 2012

conducted at Egypt also showed a significant increase in dry with a selling rate of ` 200 kg-1 dried leaves of stevia. In Canada,
leaf biomass yields of stevia when nitrogen fertilizer was it was reported that a leaf yield of 2200 kg ha-1 amounts to the
increased from 10 to 30 kg N ha-1 wherein the dry leaves yield cost of production of $ 8500, with a price of $ 3.85 kg-1 dried
increased by 64 per cent compared to lower dose (Allam leaves (Colombus, 1997). Megeji et al. ( 2005) at Palampur also
et al., 2001). In conformity of these findings growth and yield reported a total net returns of ` 3.75 lakhs for four years with an
of stevia increased significantly with increasing rates of N, P average annual income of ` 0.93 lakhs ha-1 at a sale price of `
and K up to 60:30:45 kg ha-1 per crop with the highest dry leaf 100 kg-1 dried leaves, with a benefit cost ratio of 1.89. In pooled
yield which was on par with 40:20:30 kg ha-1 per crop in sandy data nitrogen level of 400 kg ha-1 (N2) recorded the highest B:C
loam soils at Bangalore (Chalapathi et al., 1999b). Interaction (3.01) which was on par with nitrogen level of N2 i.e., 300 kg ha-1
effects of nutrient levels on dry leaf yield were not significant. (2.93), but significantly higher than N1 i.e., 200 kg ha-1 (2.66).
Economics of stevia cultivation as influenced by different Higher level of phosphorous P3 i.e., 200 kg ha-1 resulted in higher
levels of nutrients is presented in Table 3. In pooled data N3 i.e., B:C (2.96) which was on par with P2 i.e., 150 kg ha-1 (2.91).
400 kg ha-1 recorded a net returns of ` 7,62,615 ha-1 which was Potassium level influenced the B:C non-significantly. Significantly
on par with N2 i.e., 300 kg ha-1 (` 7,20,780 ha-1). Higher lower B:C was recorded with absolute control in pooled data
phosphorus level P3 i.e., 200 kg ha-1 recorded the highest net (1.44). However, the interaction effects proved to be non-
returns (` 7,37,880 ha-1) which was on par with P2 i.e., 150 kg significant.
ha-1 (` 7,12,680 ha-1). Higher levels of potassium K2 i.e., 200 kg Stevia responded significantly up to 300:150:100 kg ha-1 NPK
ha-1 recorded the net returns (` 7,05,905 ha-1) comparable with wherein five cuttings were possible in a year. As all interactions
K1 i.e., 100 kg ha-1 (` 6,78,015 ha-1) in pooled data. Absolute are non significant, based on the main factors effect and
control recorded significantly lower net returns of ` 2,59,064 ha-1 economics, the combination of N2P2K1 i.e., 300:150:100 kg ha-1
as compared to rest of the treatments (Table 3). Barathi (2003) at for a total of five crops in a year has been considered as the
Coimbatore reported a total net profit of about ` 1.8 lakhs acre- economically optimum level of nutrients for stevia in medium
1
during first year and ` 4.5 lakhs acre-1 during subsequent years black soil under irrigation.

Table 3. Economics of stevia as influenced by different nutrient levels


*Treatment Gross returns Cost of cultivation Net returns Benefit :Cost
(` ha-1) (` ha-1) (` ha-1)
2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled 2004-05 2005-06 Pooled

Nitrogen levels (N)


N1 (200 kg ha-1) 924000 976000 950000 524826 190652 357739 399600 785370 592485 1.76 5.11 2.66
N2 (300 kg ha-1) 1066000 1122000 1094000 540108 206325 373216 526140 915420 720780 1.97 5.42 2.93
N3 (400 kg ha-1) 1112000 1172000 1141704 545736 212438 379087 565790 959440 762615 2.03 5.51 3.01
S.Em.± 22660 16402 18516 2266 1640 1852 20396 14762 16664 0.03 0.04 0.03
C.D.(P=0.05) 65130 47141 53214 6513 4714 5321 58620 42427 47893 0.10 011 0.09
Phosphorous levels (P)
P1 (100 kg ha-1) 968000 1006000 986764 529190 193696 361443 438380 812260 625320 1.82 5.18 2.73
P2 (150 kg ha-1) 1052000 1118000 1084998 538681 205951 372316 513300 912060 712680 1.95 5.41 2.91
P3 (200 kg ha-1) 1083000 1146000 1114165 542799 209767 376283 539860 935900 737880 1.99 5.45 2.96
SEm± 22660 16400 18516 2266 1640 1852 20396 14762 16664 0.03 0.04 0.03
C.D.(P=0.05) 65130 47140 53214 6513 4714 5321 58620 42427 47893 0.10 0.11 0.09
Potassium levels (K)
K1 (100 kg ha-1) 1019000 1073000 1046035 535005 201035 368020 484210 871820 678015 1.90 5.32 2.84
K2 (200 kg ha-1) 1049000 1107000 1077917 538775 205241 372008 510140 901670 705905 1.94 5.37 2.89
S.Em.± 18500 28410 15118 1850 1339 1512 16654 12053 13606 0.03 0.03 0.02
C.D.(P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Absolute control 470000 376000 423000 472829 114107 293468 (-) 2829 261893 259064 0.99 3.29 1.44
Control v/s Treatment
S.Em.± 54100 39202 44095 5410 3920 4410 48690 35282 39686 0.08 0.09 0.07
C.D.(P=0.05) 155170 112440 126472 15516 11244 12647 139650 101196 113825 0.23 0.25 0.22
All interactions NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
2004-05: average of first five cuttings 2005-06: average of next consecutive five cuttings
Pooled : Average of 1 to 10 cuttings Seedling cost: ` 3 per seedling Selling price : ` 100/ kg dry stevia leaf NS : Non significant
* N, P and K doses applied for five cuttings in equal splits

28
Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels on growth and....

References
Allam, A. I., Nassar, A. M. and Besheit, S. Y., 2001. nile.enal.sci.eg/ Chalapathi, M. V., Timmegowda. S., Rama Krishna Prama, V. and Prasad. T.
G., 1997b, Natural non calorie sweetener stevia (Stevia rebaudiana
Arc Journal/uga.htm.
Bertoni): A future crop of India. Crop Res., 14 : 347-350.
Barathi, N., 2003, Stevia- The calorie free natural sweetener. Natural
Colombus, M., 1997, The Cultivation of Stevia, "Natures Sweetener",
Product Radiance 2., pp. 120-122. QMAFRA : Ontaria Canada. P.4.
Brandle, J. E. and Rosa, N., 1992, Heritability for yield, leaf: stem ratio Kawatani, T., Kaneki, Y. and Tanabe, T. and Takahashi, T., 1980, On
and stevioside content estimated from a landrace cultivar of cultivation of Kaa-He-E (Stevia rebaudiana Bert).VI. Response
Stevia rebaudiana. Canadian J. Plant Sci., 72 : 1263-1266. of stevia to potassium fertilization rates and to the three major
elements of fertilizer. Nettai Nogyo 24, 105-112.
Buana, L. and Goenadi, D.H., 1985, A study on the correlation between
growth and yield of stevia. Menara Perkebunan, 53 : 68-71. Megeji, N. W., Kumar, J. K., Virendra Singh, Kaul, V. K. and Ahuja, P.
S., 2005, Introducing Stevia rebaudiana, a natural zero-calorie
Chalapathi, M. V., Timmegowda. S. Rama Krishna Prama, V. and Prasad. sweetener. Curr. Sci., 88 (5) : 801-804.
T. G., 1997b, Natural non calorie sweetener stevia (Stevia
Murayama, S., Rayano, R., Miyazato, K. and Nose, A., 1980, Studies on
rebaudiana Bertoni): A future crop of India. Crop Res., 14 : the cultivation of Stevia rebaudiana. Effects of fertilizers, planting
347-350. density and seedling clones on growth and yield. Science Bulletin
Chalapathi, M. V., Kumar, N. D., Rao, G. G. E. and Jayaramaiah, R., of the College of Agriculture, Univ., Ryakyus, Okinawa, 27 : 1-8.
1999, Comparative performance of plant and ratoon crops of Shock, C. C., 1982a, Experimental cultivation of Rebaudis Stevia in
stevia. Indian Agril., 43 : 211-212 California. Agron. Prog. Rep., 122 : 250-258.

29

You might also like