You are on page 1of 2

SSPC-ME 1

May 1, 1997

SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings

TEST PANEL PREPARATION METHOD NO. 1


Uncontaminated Rusted Steel
1. Scope 3.5 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MA-
TERIALS (ASTM) STANDARDS:
1.1 This specification describes the requirements for
preparing standard laboratory corroded test panels for use A 36 Specification for Structural Steel
in evaluating coatings in accelerated or fence tests. G 85 Practice for Modified Salt Spray (Fog)
Testing (Annex A.5)
1.2 Test panels prepared in accordance with this speci-
fication are intended primarily for evaluating the perfor- 4. Preparation of Test Panels
mance of coatings that are recommended for use on mini-
mally prepared, minimally contaminated substrates. The 4.1 Test panels shall be of A 36 steel with dimensions
test panels are intended to represent the minimally rusted as agreed upon between the purchaser and supplier.
steel surface after being cleaned to SSPC-SP 2 (Hand Tool
Cleaning). 4.2 Test panels shall be solvent cleaned in accordance
with SSPC-SP 1.
1.3 Test panels prepared in accordance with this speci-
fication should not be used for evaluating the performance 4.3 Test panels shall be abrasive blast cleaned in
of coatings recommended for use over marine and industrial accordance with SSPC-SP 10, using a contaminant-free
contaminated rusted steel. manufactured abrasive such as aluminum oxide.

2. Description 5. Corrosion of Test Panels

2.1 This is a method for preparing standard corroded 5.1 Test panels shall be exposed in a cyclic spray
test panels. The method is both rapid and reproducible. cabinet (see ASTM G 85, Annex A.5).
Steel panels are initially prepared in accordance with SSPC-
SP 10 (Near White Metal Blast Cleaning) and then exposed 5.2 The cyclic spray cabinet shall alternate between
in a cyclic wet/dry cabinet. This produces dense uniform one hour wet (ambient temperature, deionized water) and
corrosion products. The method employs deionized water one hour dry conditions (initial dry temperature 25°C, final
and is not intended to deposit soluble ionic species on the dry temperature of 45°C achieved after 30 minutes).
substrates.
5.3 The total exposure time in the cyclic spray cabinet
shall be 504 hours (three weeks). Panels shall be rotated
3. Reference Standards
through six positions in the cabinet such that each panel
3.1 The standards referenced in this guide are listed in spends an equal amount of time at each position. The
Sections 3.4 and 3.5 and form a part of this specification. positions are the right, center, and left sides of the top and
bottom rows of the cabinet. The middle row of the cabinet
3.2 The latest issue, revision, or amendment of the shall not be used except with newer models of cabinets
referenced standards in effect on the date of invitation to bid where it can be shown that temperature variations are not
shall govern unless otherwise specified. greater than those observed in the right, center, and left
positions of the top and bottom rows.
3.3 If there is a conflict between the requirements of any
of the stated reference standards and this specification, the 6. Inspection of Corroded Test Panels
requirements of this specification shall prevail.
6.1 The corroded test panels shall be uniformly cor-
3.4 SSPC AND JOINT STANDARDS: roded over the entire surface. Between-panel variations
shall not be statistically significant. Estimate uniformity of
PA 2 Measurement of Dry Coating rusting by SSPC-PA 2, “Measurement of Dry Coating Thick-
Thickness with Magnetic ness with Magnetic Gages.” NOTE: If the variation of rust
Gages thickness of a panel from the mean exceeds the requirement
SP 1 Solvent Cleaning in Section 6.1.1, do not use such a panel.
SP 2 Hand Tool Cleaning
SP 10/NACE No. 2 Near White Metal Blast Cleaning

765
SSPC-ME 1
May 1, 1997

6.1.1 After measuring the rust thickness on each panel user of this specification, as well as the user of all products
determine the mean rust thickness for the entire population or practices described herein, is responsible for instituting
of prepared panels. Determine the standard deviation from appropriate health and safety practices and for insuring
the mean rust thickness of the panel population. Discard compliance with all governmental regulations.
any panels from the full population which are not within ± 2
standard deviations of the population mean rust thickness. Appendix A—Supplementary Information

7. Preparation and Storage of Test Panels The utility of this method was evaluated in a research
Prior to Coating Application project conducted by SSPC and sponsored by the U.S.
Army Construction Engineering Research Lab. Key results
7.1 Corroded test panels may be stored indefinitely from this study are:
under dry conditions prior to coating application and subse-
quent exposure testing. A.1 Statistically high significant agreement (corre-
lation between two factors at the 99% confidence level) is
7.2 Corroded test panels shall be blown down with demonstrated between the unranked performance of coat-
clean, dry compressed air prior to coating application. ing systems applied to test panels prepared by this method
when subjected to accelerated testing.
8. Disclaimer
A.2 Statistically significant agreement (correlation
8.1 While every precaution is taken to ensure that all between two factors at the 95% confidence level) is demon-
information furnished in SSPC standards and specifications strated between the unranked performance of coating sys-
is as accurate, complete and useful as possible, SSPC tems applied to panels prepared by this method and natu-
cannot assume responsibility nor incur any obligation result- rally rusted surfaces when subjected to accelerated testing.
ing from the use of any materials, or coatings or methods
specified therein, or of the specification or standard itself. A.3 Statistically high significant agreement is dem-
onstrated between the ranked performance of coatings
8.2 This specification does not attempt to address applied to panels prepared by this method and naturally
problems concerning safety associated with its use. The rusted surfaces when subjected to accelerated testing.

766

You might also like