Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=asa.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
American Sociological Review.
http://www.jstor.org
TECHNIQUES OF NEUTRALIZATION:
A THEORY OF DELINQUENCY
effect, the delinquent approaches a "billiard many delinquents seem to show a surprising aware-
ness of sociological and psychological explanations
ball" conception of himself in which he sees for their behavior and are quick to point out the
himself as helplessly propelled into new causal role of their poor environment.
situations. From a psychodynamicviewpoint, 9 It is possible, of course, that certain person-
ality structures can accept some techniques of neu-
this orientation toward one's own actions tralization more readily than others, but this ques-
may represent a profound alienation from tion remains largely unexplored.
668 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICALREVIEW
and in a hazy fashion, feels that his behavior victim may be denied for the delinquent, in
does not really cause any great harm despite a somewhat different sense, by the circum-
the fact that it runs counter to law. Just as stances of the delinquent act itself. Insofar
the link between the individual and his acts as the victim is physically absent, unknown,
may be broken by the denial of responsibil- or a vague abstraction (as is often the case
ity, so may the link between acts and their in delinquent acts committed against prop-
consequences be broken by the denial of erty), the awareness of the victim's exis-
injury. Since society sometimes agrees with tence is weakened. Internalized norms and
the delinquent, e.g., in matters such as tru- anticipations of the reactions of others
ancy, "pranks," and so on, it merely reaf- must somehow be activated, if they are to
firms the idea that the delinquent's neu- serve as guides for behavior; and it is pos-
tralization of social controls by means of sible that a diminished awarenes of the
qualifying the norms is an extension of victim plays an important part in determin-
common practice rather than a gesture of ing whether or not this process is set in
complete opposition. motion.
The Denial of the Victim. Even if the The Condemnation of the Condemners.
delinquent accepts the responsibility for his A fourth technique of neutralization would
deviant actions and is willing to admit that appear to involve a condemnation of the
his deviant actions involve an injury or condemnersor, as McCorkle and Korn have
hurt, the moral indignation of self and phrased it, a rejection of the rejectors." The
others may be neutralized by an insistence delinquent shifts the focus of attention
that the injury is not wrong in light of the from his own deviant acts to the motives and
circumstances.The injury, it may be claimed, behavior of those who disapprove of his
is not really an injury; rather, it is a form violations. His condemners, he may claim,
of rightful retaliation or punishment. By a are hypocrites, deviants in disguise, or im-
subtle alchemy the delinquent moves him- pelled by personal spite. This orientation
self into the position of an avenger and the toward the conforming world may be of
victim is transformed into a wrong-doer. particular importance when it hardens into
Assaults on homosexuals or suspected homo- a bitter cynicism directed against those
sexuals, attacks on members of minority assigned the task of enforcing or expressing
groups who are said to have gotten "out of the norms of the dominant society. Police,
place," vandalism as revenge on an unfair it may be said, are corrupt, stupid, and
teacher or school official, thefts from a brutal. Teachers always show favoritism
"crooked" store owner-all may be hurts and parents always "take it out" on their
inflicted on a transgressor,in the eyes of the children. By a slight extension, the rewards
delinquent. As Orwell has pointed out, the of conformity-such as material success-
type of criminal admired by the general become a matter of pull or luck, thus de-
public has probably changed over the course creasing still further the stature of those
of years and Raffles no longer serves as a who stand on the side of the law-abiding.
hero; 10 but Robin Hood, and his latter day The validity of this jaundiced viewpoint is
derivatives such as the tough detective seek- not so important as its function in turning
ing justice outside the law, still capture the back or deflecting the negative sanctions
popular imagination,and the delinquent may attached to violations of the norms. The
view his acts as part of a similar role. delinquent, in effect, has changed the subject
To deny the existence of the victim, then, of the conversation in the dialogue between
by transforminghim into a person deserving his own deviant impulses and the reactions of
injury is an extreme form of a phenomenon others; and by attacking others, the wrong-
we have mentioned before, namely, the de- fulness of his own behavior is more easily
linquent's recognition of appropriate and repressed or lost to view.
inappropriatetargets for his delinquent acts.
In addition, however, the existence of the 11 Lloyd W. McCorkle and Richard Korn, "Re-
socialization Within Walls," The Annals of the
IO George Orwell, Dickens, Dali, and Others, American Academy of Political and Social Science,
New York: Reynal, 1946. 293, (May, 1954), pp. 88-98.
TECHNIQUES OF NEUTRALIZATION 669
The Appeal to Higher Loyalties. Fifth, anybody." "They had it coming to them."
and last, internal and external social controls "Everybody'spicking on me." " I didn't do it
may be neutralized by sacrificing the de- for myself." These slogans or their variants,
mands of the larger society for the demands we hypothesize, prepare the juvenile for de-
of the smaller social groups to which the linquent acts. These "definitions of the sit-
delinquent belongs such as the sibling pair, uation" represent tangential or glancing
the gang, or the friendship clique. It is blows at the dominant normative system
important to note that the delinquent does rather than the creation of an opposing
not necessarily repudiate the imperatives of ideology; and they are extensions of patterns
the dominant normative system, despite his of thought prevalent in society rather than
failure to follow them. Rather, the delinquent something created de novo.
may see himself as caught up in a dilemma Techniques of neutralization may not be
that must be resolved, unfortunately, at the powerful enough to fully shield the individual
cost of violating the law. One aspect of this from the force of his own internalizedvalues
situation has been studied by Stouffer and and the reactions of conforming others, for
Toby in their research on the conflict be- as we have pointed out, juvenile delinquents
tween particularistic and universalistic de- often appear to suffer from feelings of guilt
mands, between the claims of friendship and and shame when called into account for
general social obligations, and their results their deviant behavior.And some delinquents
suggest that "it is possible to classify people may be so isolated from the world of con-
according to a predisposition to select one formity that techniquesof neutralizationneed
or the other horn of a dilemma in role con- not be called into play. Nonetheless, we
flict." 12 For our purposes,however, the most would argue that techniquesof neutralization
importantpoint is that deviation from certain are critical in lessening the effectiveness of
norms may occur not because the norms are social controlsand that they lie behind a large
rejected but because other norms, held to share of delinquent behavior. Empirical re-
be more pressing or involving a higher loy-
search in this area is scattered and fragmen-
alty, are accorded precedence. Indeed, it is
tary at the present time, but the work of
the fact that both sets of norms are believed
in that gives meaning to our concepts of Redl,13 Cressy,'4 and others has supplied a
dilemma and role conflict. body of significant data that has done much
The conflict between the claims of friend- to clarify the theoretical issues and enlarge
ship and the claims of law, or a similar the fund of supporting evidence. Two lines
dilemma, has of course long been recognized of investigation seem to be critical at this
by the social scientist (and the novelist) as stage. First, there is need for more knowl-
a common human problem. If the juvenile edge concerning the differential distribution
delinquent frequently resolves his dilemma of techniques of neutralization, as operative
by insisting that he must "always help a patterns of thought, by age, sex, social class,
buddy" or "never squeal on a friend," even ethnic group, etc. On a priori grounds it
when it throws him into serious difficulties might be assumed that these justifications
with the dominant social order, his choice for deviance will be more readily seized by
remains familiar to the supposedly law-abid- segments of society for whom a discrepancy
ing. The delinquent is unusual, perhaps, in between common social ideals and social
the extent to which he is able to see the fact practice is most apparent. It is also possible
that he acts in behalf of the smaller social however, that the habit of "bending" the
groups to which he belongs as a justification
dominant normative system-if not "break-
for violations of society's norms, but it is a
ing" it-cuts across our cruder social cate-
matter of degree rather than of kind.
"I didn't mean it." "I didn't really hurt gories and is to be traced primarily to
patterns of social interaction within the
12 See Samuel A. Stouffer and Jackson Toby,
13 See Fritz Redl and David Wineman, Children
"Role Conflict and Personality," in Toward a Gen-
eral Theory of Action, edited by Talcott Parsons Who Hate, Glencoe: The Free Press, 1956.
14 See D. R. Cressey, Other People's Money,
and Edward A. Shils, Cambridge: Harvard Uni-
versity Press, 1951, p. 494. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1953.
670 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICALREVIEW
familial circle. Second, there is need for a from clear and stands in need of more
greater understanding of the internal information.
structure of techniques of neutralization, as In any case, techniques of neutralization
a system of beliefs and attitudes, and its appear to offer a promising line of research
relationship to various types of delinquent in enlarging and systematizing the theoret-
behavior. Certain techniques of neutraliza- ical grasp of juvenile delinquency. As more
tion would appear to be better adapted to information is uncovered concerning tech-
particular deviant acts than to others, as niques of neutralization, their origins, and
we have suggested, for example, in the case their consequences,both juvenile delinquency
of offenses against property and the denial in particular, and deviation from normative
of the victim. But the issue remains far systems in general may be illuminated.
A MEASURE OF ALIENATION
GWYNN NETTLER
Community Council of Houston
THE idea of "alienation" has a long his- things-it became possible to add other es-
tory but a recent vogue and, as with tranging factors and to see fractures not
any such familiar concept refurbished merely between man and nature, but within
for scholarly purposes, its adopters are using man, and between man and his institutions,
it variously. and between man and man. Thus, as both
Hegel first suggested the term as descrip- symptom and cause of our alleged estrange-
tive of what happens to socialized man; he ment, writers have pointed to machinery,
becomes detached from the world of nature, art, language, Original Sin, the lack of re-
including his own nature. He is Adam whose ligion, and even sociology.3
community with all other natural things has Fromm makes alienation central to the
been broken by knowledge. To knowledge, thesis of his Sane Society and, for him, the
Marx added labor as an alienating factor hallmark of the alienated is his "marketing
and, a Jortiori, the division of labor, which orientation," his regarding the world and
creates ". . . a conflict between the interest himself as commodities to which monetary
of the single individual . . . and the common values may be assigned and which may be
interests of all individuals."' Durkheim's peddled.4 Warner and Abegglen implicitly
anomie resides here, of course, but it was relate such a marketing orientation of the
Marx's conception of the state as necessary big business leader to the more customary
to reconcile the conflicting interests conse- conception of alienation as isolation from
quent upon man's laboring that showed the others. They say, ". . . all of these mobile
possibility of another source of alienation: men, as a necessary part of the equipment
that ". . . man's own accomplishments turn that makes it possible for them to be mobile
into a power alien and opposed to him, which and leave people behind without fear or re-
come to subjugate him instead of being con- gret, have difficulty in accepting and im-
trolled by him." 2 And this idea is cousin to posing the kinds of reciprocalobligations that
Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents. close friendship and intimate social contacts
Once these ideas were imbibed- that 3 For example, see Colin Wilson, The Outsider,
knowledge (self-consciousness) and labor Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1956, Erich Kahler,
separated man from all other "natural" The Tower and the Abyss, New York: Braziller,
1957; Paul Tillich, Existence and the Christ, Chi-
1 Karl Marx, "Deutsche Ideologie: Feuerbach," cago: University of Chicago Press, 1957; J. W.
Der Historische Materialismus, edited by S. Krutch, "If You Don't Mind My Saying So . . .,"
Landshut and J. P. Mayer, Leipzig: Kr6ner, 1932, The American Scholar, 26 (Winter, 1956-57), p. 91.
p. 23. 4 Erich Fromm, The Sane Society, New York:
2 Ibid. Rinehart, 1955, p. 124.