Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ON
EMPLOYEE LEGISLATION
Presented by
Students of Accord Business School, Tirupati
(Batch – 2010 -2012)
A HANDBOOK
ON
EMPLOYEE LEGISLATION
Presented by
Students of Accord Business School
(Batch – 2010 -2012)
(Under the supervision of Mrs.Anupama,MHRM,Ph.D)
Preface
The material contained in this book has been organized in accordance with the syllabus of
Employee Legislation paper - Human Resource specialization of Department of Business
Management, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati. The main syllabus of the University is
divided into five units categorized into industrial relations laws, laws relating to misconduct,
discharge, domestic enquiry, disciplinary action, social surity laws, wages and bonus laws and laws
relating to working conditions. The syllabus of three units are incoporated in Part- I of the book and
the topics of fourth and fifth units are incorporated in Part – II of the book.
Additional material on case laws, famous Supreme Court Judgements, a case study on the
implementation of Employee Legislations at Allsec Technologies is also attached to Part – I of the
book.
Part – II book has the material contributed by Mr.V.Chandra Sekhar, Manager (HR), Amara Raja
Batteries Limited on the latest trends of Human Resource Management and implementation of
Employee legislation at work place. A special focus is made on the Factories Act,1948 by him. A
part of contents related to legal terminology is also put at the end of the Part – II copy.
We the students of Accord Business School Batch: 2010-2011 express our deep gratitude to the
management for giving such an opportunity and encouragement drafting and presenting this book to
the library of our college. We hope that this book will certainly help the coming juniors (next
batches) for reference and for new insights drafting new editions like this on employee legislation.
We express our earnest thanks to Mr.V Chandra Sekhar, Manager (HR), Amara Raja Batteries
Limited, Karkambadi for his enlightening examples from corporate world and for his support in
organizing this book.
We extend our sincere thanks to the Chairman, Accord Business School, Tirupati for
encouraging us to give our best participation for various activities and events organized at Accord.
We express our deep gratitude to Mr.Chandra Sekhar for supporting us in organizing this book -
“A Handbook on Employee Legislation”.
We express our sincere thanks to Principal, Mr.Naga Raju, Accord Business School for his
encouragement and blessings showered on us approving our activities and making them more
meaningful.
We acknowledge our gratefulness to the Dean, Mr.Uday Gowry Shanker, Accord Business
School who has been the chief motivator and who always been a back-up in all our endeavours.
We aknowledge our sincere thanks to Mr. Naga Prabhakar, Associate Professor, Accord
Business School for his guidance and encouragement towards the orgainizing this book.
We extend our sincere thanks to Mr.Swathantra Babu, Head of the Department, Accord
Business School for being a part of all our successes in all the activities of our curriculum.
We express our deep regards to Ms.Anupama, Assistant Professor, Accord Business School for
acting as a Chief Editor and supporting us in framing this book.
We acknowledge our appreciation and thanks to all the members of the Faculty for giving their
support and wishes for making this book a grand success.
Last but not the least we extend our heartfelt thanks to all the students who contributed to this
magnificent book on Employee Legislation.
Part-I
List of Contributors
9 K.Suma & A.Mounika The Maternity Benefit Act,1961 & The Payment
Priyadharsini of Gratuity Act,1972
10 E.Ashok Kumar,B.Hima Latest Amendments of The Employee Provident
Bindu Fund, 1952 - The Maternity Benefit Act,
1961-The Payment of Gratuity Act,1972.
11 P. Sarada & V.Siva Kumar Supreme Court Judgements & Case Laws
12 K.Sandhya Rani A Case Study on Allsec Technologies, Chennai
Employee Legislation
Employment legislation is the fastest changing area of HR today. This will help you understand
what statutory instruments exist today, how they will affect the business and what areas one need to
look out for. Over time a body of law or legislation has developed governing employer/employee
relations and the rights of employees and employers in the workplace.
Industrialisation has brought with it, huge employment opportunities, mass production, distribution
of goods and commodities but at the same time carried with it certain disadvantages to workmen as
loss of freedom, unhygienic working conditions, no freedom of contract, the dynamics of market
and self interest. Peter Drucker calls it "The age of discontinuity, turbulent environment and
technocratic age". Technology has ushered in the following, (i) elimination of physical labour, (ii)
mass production at low cost (iii) too much of control mechanisms, (iv) reduction in workers ability
(v) heavy monitoring , maintaining, repairing, adjusting (vi) sense of alienation among workmen
(vii) inter dependence and (viii) strict discipline. Industry demands interaction of people. Industrial
relations involve inaction and violent action, conflict and co-operation. Labour management is
based on labour policy, laws, rules, regulations, agreements, awards, social sciences, behaviour
pattern, sociology, psychology and human approach. Industrial relation is the process by which
working people and their organisation interact at the place of work to establish terms and
conditions of work. Professor Lester "when people sell their services and spend their lives in the
premises of the purchaser of the services, a varying amount of dissatisfaction, discontent, industrial
unrest likely to occur. Hence there is a need for employee legislations. The State has enacted many
employee legislations to control the industries as to safeguard the interest of employees as well to
cater to their welfare and security needs. The Employee Legislation, The Labour Legislation or The
Industrial Legislation or The Human Resources Legislation, whatever name it may be called refers
to the one and the same concept that covers a number of legislations passed by the Parliament to
procure for the employees, higher wages, healthy working condition, opportunity to advance,
satisfaction at work, avenues for raising industrial dispute and protection against loss of wages, over
work and arbitrary treatment. This concept could easily be comprehended when we undertake the
study of all the characters who play the roles in an industrial organisation. The main characters are
Employer, Employee, the Trade Union and the Government.
Social justice: Through equal distribution of profits and other industrial benefits between owners
and workers, providing protection to workers against harmful affects to health, safety and morality.
Social equity: Labour must be dynamic; government must modify the laws in line with the
changing environment. Hence considering social equity these processes are to be carried forward.
International uniformity: While formulating and restructuring the labour laws, the government
looks into maintenance of international uniformity towards employees. Issues like compensation
packages, working conditions, vacations, incentives etc., are taken into account.
National economy: The elements of national economy such as the per capita income, GDP,
inflation trends, population demographics, cultural and political aspects are considered for the
formulation and execution of the labour laws.
The labour laws and their implementation is given lot of importance by the government because of
many socio-economic reasons and changes that have taken place since the ancient Indian society
has formed.
History begins when men actually produce their means of subsistence. “At the minimum, this
involves the production of food and shelter.” Production is a social enterprise since it requires
co-operation. Men work together to produce the goods and services necessary for life. The forces of
production of production and the product of labour were communally owned. With the emergence
of private property, and in particular, private ownership of production, the fundamental
contradictions of human society were created. A minority is able to control command and enjoy the
fruits of production which led to conflict of interests between the minority group and majority
group. In early, small scale, non-literate societies, the family and kinship relationship in general
were the basic organizing principles of social life.
Article 39 – of our Constitution empowers the labour legislation in India. Articles 36 to 51, Part
IV of the Indian Constitution make provisions regarding the Directive Principles of State
Policy. The principle goal of our sovereign democratic republic and a welfare state and also
fundamental rights are taken into consideration.
According to Article 39 – State shall, direct its policy towards securing that the -
(i) Citizens – men and women equally, have right to an adequate means of livelihood;
(ii) Ownership and control of material resources of the community – so distributed as best to
subservice the common good.
(iii) Equal pay for equal work - both men and women.
(iv) Health and safety of workers, men and women and the tender age children are not abused.
(v) The citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited to their age
or (strength) safety.
Labour administration is concerned with labour affairs and administration of social policy.
Geneva, October, 1973 – Labour administration was held to administer substantive programmes of
labour. Specialized units were formed for each of the following:
a) Labour protection (formulation of standards relative to working conditions and terms of
employment, including wages)
b) Labour inspection
c) Labour relations
d) Employment of manpower, including training, and possibly,
e) Social security.
Sequence of Events:
Order enacted.
In some cases, Labour courts, arbitration bodies and different ad-hoc commissions can be
regarded as forming part of the labour administration, machinery, though they are usually outside
the department of labour. These bodies are either tripartite or bipartite in character.
Labour administrator gives effect to laws governing employment and conditions of work. Labour
legislation is a necessary instrument for a governments' administration of labour affairs. Standards
established may be further developed, complimented or applied through administrative action.
A system of law is a guarantee for people's personal safety, liberties and rights. To maintain
respect for the law in general, the laws that are adopted must be strictly applied, without fear or
favour. It the fundamental duty to uphold the rule of law at all times. Law sometimes is unwritten,
customary and sometimes situational which is driven out of practice.
The thrust of Labour legislation is to create a climate of healthy industrial relations and
promoting an industrial culture conducive to improvement in efficiency, productive and real wages.
Though there are constraints in the implementation of the labour legislation in India, it has
enhanced the status of the workers in industry. Intervention of state in the economic affairs of the
country is possible only through the labour laws. Labour laws are very important to ensure fair
wage standards and provision of social security. Certain modifications are to be made to the labour
legislation according to the changes that are taking place in the national and international business
environments catering the needs and requirements of our economy.
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Industrial Disputes Act,1947 is enacted in accordance with the welfare concept of the
Constitution of India, and more particularly with the spirit of the Directive Principles of State
Policy. The primary objective of the Act is “to make provision for the investigation and settlement
of industrial disputes, and for certain other purposes”. This Act is for regulating the relation of
employers and workmen – past, present and future. It is based on the necessity of achieving
collective amity between labour and capital by means of conciliation, mediation, arbitration, and
adjudication.
● This Act also aims to achieve collective bargaining and industrial peace.
● It enables the workers to participate in the management of the industries as per the wishes of
the Article 43-A.
● It reduces the tensions between the employer and employees.
● It provides the necessary machinery to prevent illegal strikes, lock-outs, lay-offs,
retrenchments, etc.
● It renders social justice to both the employees and employers.
● It enhances the dignity of the workmen and integrity of the industry.
The idea of Industrial disputes was practically unknown to India till the end of the World War I
(1914-18).
There was no special legislation as such on the issue of disputes in Industries as such and so at that
time ordinary principles of master and servant were used to govern the relations between the
employers and employees in the industries.
At that point of time, majority of the industries were under the control of the British industrialists -
administration and the War provided them with an opportunity to increase their production and
henceforth their profits as well.
England emerged successful in World War I which gave rise to establishment of a large number of
factories and so huge investment of money.
In spite of huge investment there was no improvement in the condition of labour. The year of 1919
marks the outbreak of an industrial strike on scale previously unknown to the world. The formation
of the International Labour Organization provoked the labour class and instilled the spirit among
labour community to struggle for their rights. The first session of the International Labour
Conference took place in Washington in 1919 and India also participated in the Conference.
The provinces of Bombay and Bengal were the first one to take initiative and they appointed
committees to investigate the matter to consider and report or create machinery for prevention or
settlement of disputes. The Bengal committee recommended the formation of joint workers
committee and it was not in favour of any sort of government interference or any type of special
legislation to decide labour disputes, but however they did recommended the formation and setting
up of Industrial Courts. The Bombay Government at that adhering to the recommendations of the
committee about setting up of the Industrial Courts, introduced a Bill in the Legislative Council of
the State, but due to the interference of the Central Government the bill was dropped and not
introduced before the Legislative Council of the State.
The Central Government however enacted the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, the Mines Act,
1923 and also the all important Trade Unions Act of 1926. As an experimental measure, the Indian
Trade Disputes Act was passed in the year 1929 on the lines of the British Trade Disputes Act of
1927. It was to remain if force for five years. The Act was made permanent in April, 1934. There
were intensive agitations around the country in 1929 by various labour leaders demanding reforms
and expansion of labour laws, resulting in appointment of a Royal Commission on Indian Labour by
the King Emperor. The object of the of the commission was to enquire into and report on existing
conditions of labour in industrial undertakings in British India ; on Health, efficiency and standard
of living of the workers ; and on the relation between the employer and the employed; and to make
recommendations thereon.
Under the Government of India Act, 1935, provincial autonomy was given to all provinces. The
governments of many states appointed committees to inquire and to examine the present levels of
wages, conditions of work and make necessary recommendations henceforth. One of the first and
the most important measure so adopted was the enactment of the Bombay Industrial Disputes Act of
1938. When the Second World War started it once again changed the complexion of the Labour
Struggle. The Central Government being controlled by the Britishers was always in a more
advantageous position in terms of the powers when compared to the Provincial Governments.
They had exclusive powers of control of any trade or industry which were given to them by the
Defence of India Act, 1939. It also gave powers to regulate and control of any trade or industry, for
the purpose of maintaining of essential services for the life of the community. In January, 1942 Rule
81 was added to the said rules by the legislative authorities to restrain Lock – Outs and Strikes, this
rule made strike and lock outs prohibitive until under very restricted conditions. The government
was given exclusive power to refer industrial disputes to adjudication and enforce the awards. These
provisions including the Trade Disputes Act form the basic structure and backbone of the Industrial
Disputes Act.
The Rule 81- A empowered the Central Government to make provisions for prohibiting, subject to
provisions of an order; a strike or a lock- out in connection with any trade dispute and it also makes
it an offence to contravene any order made under it and prescribes punishment for the same.
The lapse of Defence of India Act, 1939 and its Rules, the government made the provision for the
settlement and investigations of industrial disputes and for other purposes enacted the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947.
The object of the Act is not only to make provision for investigation and settlements of industrial
disputes, but also to secure industrial peace so that it may result in more production and improve
national economy and to ensure fair settlements to the workmen and to prevent disputes between
the employers and employees so that production may not be adversely affected and the larger
interests of the public may not suffer.
1) The promotion of measures for securing and preserving amity and good relations between the
employer and workmen.
2)An investigation and settlement of industrial disputes between employers and employers,
employers and workmen or workmen and workmen as a result of representation by a registered
trade union or federation of trade unions or association of employers or federation of associations of
employers.
11.Procedure and Powers of conciliation Officers, Boards, Courts and Tribunals and
National Tribunal
● To enter in to the premises occupied by any establishment to which the dispute relates.
● To examine any person and to inspect any document.
● To hold conciliation proceedings.
● To investigate the dispute.
● To send the report to the appropriate government, report in cases of no settlement.
● Time period for the submission of the report – 14 days.
11A.Powers of Labour Courts, Tribunals and National Tribunals to give appropriate
relief in case of discharge or dismissal of workmen
12.Duties of Conciliation Officers
13.Duties of Board – The Board shall submit its report to the appropriate government within 2
months or as specified by the appropriate government.
14.Duties of Courts
A Court shall inquire into the matters referred to it and report thereon to the appropriate
Government ordinarily within a period of six months from the commencement of its inquiry.
15.Duties of Labour Courts, Tribunals and National Tribunals
16.Form of report or award
(1) The report of a Board or Court shall be in writing and shall be signed by all the members of
the Board or Court, as the case may be:
Provided that nothing in this section shall be deemed to prevent any member of the Board or
Court from recording any minute of dissent from a report or from any recommendation made
therein.
(2) The award of a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal shall be in writing and shall
be signed by its presiding officer.
The Industrial Disputes (AMENDMENT) Bill, 2010 passed by the Rajya Sabha
The Industrial Disputes Act 1947 provides a framework for investigation and settlement of
industrial disputes. The Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Bill, 2010 was finalized after detailed
consultations with stake holders and the Government had formulated the amendment proposals
mainly on the issues on which consensus were arrived at. The Industrial Dispute (Amendment) Bill,
2009 was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 26.2.2009. The Bill was referred to the Parliamentary
Standing Committee on Labour. The Committee examined the Bill and made certain
recommendations for further modifications to the amendments proposed in the Bill. The
Government accepted some of its recommendations.
The amendment proposals in the Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Bill, 2010 inter-alia, seek
to amplify the definition of ‘appropriate Government’, enhance the wage ceiling prescribed for
supervisors, provide direct access for workman to Labour courts or Tribunal in case of individual
disputes, expand the scope of qualifications of Presiding Officers of Labour Courts or Tribunal,
setting up of Grievance Settlement Machinery and empowerment of Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Courts to enforce decree.
The Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Bill, 2010 as amended was considered and passed by
the Rajya Sabha on 3.8.2010.
In his introductory remarks the Minister of Labour and Employment Shri Mallikarjun
Kharge said that the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 is a significant piece of legislation which
provides a framework for investigation and settlement of industrial disputes. The Act also seeks to
regulate illegal strikes and lockouts, and provides protection to the workmen in case of lay-off,
retrenchment and closure of establishments. Ministry of Labour & Employment has held tripartite
consultations with stake holders and formulated proposals for amendment in the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 on the issues on which consensus was arrived at.
The Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Bill, 2010 seeks the following:
Section 2(a): Amplification of definition of Appropriate Government
The Bill proposes to amplify the definition of ‘appropriate Government’ under 2(a) of the Act. The
Central Government is the appropriate Government in respect of categories listed in Section 2(a)(i)
of the I.D. Act, 1947. In addition to this, it is further clarified that Central Government would be
appropriate Government for any company in which not less than fifty-one per cent of the paid-up
share capital is held by the Central Government, or any corporation, (not being a corporation
referred to in this clause) established by or under any law made by Parliament, or the Central Public
Sector Undertaking, subsidiary companies set up by the principal undertaking and autonomous
bodies owned or controlled by the Central Government.
State Government will be the appropriate Government in relation to any other industrial dispute,
including the State Public Sector Undertaking, subsidiary companies set up by the principal
undertaking and autonomous bodies owned or controlled by the State Government.
To amplify the definition of term ‘appropriate Government’ the Standing Committee has suggested
that the industrial disputes between a contractor and contract labour employed in any industrial
establishment needs to be brought under the purview of ‘appropriate Government’. The
Government has accepted this recommendation of the Committee. This amplification of the
definition will eliminate all ambiguities in the interpretation of the definition of ‘appropriate
Government’.
Section 2(s): Amendment of Section 2(s) (iv) - Enhancing the wage ceiling of Rs.1600 per
month prescribed for supervisors in the definition of workmen under Section 2(s) to Rs.10,
000 per month.
The Bill is for enhancement of wage ceiling of the workers working in a supervisory capacity from
one thousand six hundred rupees per month to ten thousand rupees per month. The wage ceiling has
been enhanced to be in consonance with the increase in wages of industrial workers and also to
bring about parity with other labour laws like Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Payment of
Bonus Act, 1965 and Payment of Wages Act, 1936.
Section 2A: Direct reference of disputes connected with Termination/ Dismissal/
Retrenchment/ Discharge to Industrial Tribunals.
To provide direct access for the workman to the Labour Court or Tribunal in case of disputes
arising out of Section 2A pertaining to retrenchment, discharge, dismissal or termination of services
etc. At present, such a dispute could be adjudicated by CGIT-cum LC only after a reference is made
by the ‘appropriate Government’. As a consequence of this proposed amendment, the workman can
directly approach the CGIT-cum-LC after filing his grievance before the conciliation machinery to
resolve the issue within 45 days. There will be no need for him to approach the ‘appropriate
Government’ for making a reference. This amendment would enable the aggrieved workman to
choose the alternative of adjudication for resolution of his dispute faster.
Substitution of new Chapter for Chapter IIB-Setting of Grievance Redressal Machinery:
The Bill seeks to establish a Grievance Redressal Machinery (GRM) within industrial establishment
having 20 or more workmen with one stage appeal at the head of the establishment for resolution of
disputes arising out of individual grievances. With this amendment, the workman will get one more
alternative grievance redressal mechanism for the resolution of his dispute within the organization
itself with minimum necessity for adjudication. It may be noted that setting up of GRM in no way
will affect the right of the workman to raise dispute on the same issue under the provision of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Section 7: Relaxation of Qualifications of Presiding Officers.
It is also proposed to expand the scope of qualification of Presiding Officers of CGIT-cum-LC by
making officers of Central Labour Service of the rank of Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner and
State Labour Department of the rank of Joint Labour Commissioner and officers of the Indian Legal
Service Gr.III eligible for the post of Presiding Officer in CGIT-cum-LC. This will enable the
Government to appoint the Presiding Officers from wide range of eligible officers from the relevant
field.
Section 11: - Power to enforce Decree by CGIT.
The Bill also proposes to empower the Labour Court or Tribunal to execute their awards, orders of
settlements arrived at as a decree of a w:st="on"Civil Court. This amendment will ensure better
enforcement of the awards given by CGITs-cum-LC.
Section 38(2) © - Salaries and allowances and other terms and conditions of service of
Presiding Officer of Central Government Industrial Tribunals-cum-Labour Courts (CGIT)
and National Tribunals.
The Bill proposes to make a specific provision in the Act by amending the Section 38(2) © of the
Act that Government may make rules to decide and review the salaries and allowances and other
terms and conditions for appointment of Presiding Officers. Details will be worked out while
framing the rules. To Summarise, the main amendment proposals in the I.D. Act are:
(i) Amplification of the definition of ‘Appropriate Government’.
(ii) To enhance the wage limit from Rs.1600/- per month to Rs. 10,000/- per month to make the
provision meaningful and in tune with the definition of workman in other labour laws
such as Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and Employees’
State Insurance Act, 1948.
(iii )To provide a grievance ventilation and redressal machinery within an establishment having
20 or more workmen with one stage appeal at the level of the Head of the Industrial
Establishment in order to promote better industrial relations at the industrial
establishment level.
(iv) To provide individual workman direct access to Labour Courts/ Tribunals in cases of
retrenchment, discharge, dismissal or termination of services.
(vi) To make officers of the Central Labour Service/State Labour Service/Indian Legal Service
eligible for the post of Presiding Officers in the Central Government Industrial
Tribunals–cum-Labour Courts for addressing the problem of availability of Presiding
Officers.
(vi) To empower Government to make rules to decide and review the salaries and allowances
and other terms and conditions for appointment of Presiding Officers.
(vii)To empower Central Government Industrial Tribunals, Labour Courts and National
Tribunals to execute their awards/orders/settlements as a decree of the civil court.
Chapter – I : Preliminary
1. Short title, extent and commencement.
(1) This Act may be called the Trade Unions Act, 1926.
(2) It extends to the whole of India
(3) It shall come into force on such date4 as the Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette, appoint
2. Definitions.
In this Act 1 [“the appropriate Government” means, in relation to Trade Unions whose
objects are not confined to one State, the Central Government, and in relation to other Trade
Unions, the State Government, and], unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or
context,—
(a) “executive’’ means the body, by whatever name called, to which the management of the
affairs of a Trade Union is entrusted;
State Amendment
“(a) ‘approved list’ means the list of approved unions maintained by the Registrar under
section 28A;
(a1) ‘Approved union’ means a registered Trade Union on the approved list.”
(e) “registered Trade Union” means a Trade Union registered under this Act;
3
[(f) “Registrar” means—
(vii) a Registrar of Trade Unions appointed by the appropriate Government under section 3,
and includes any Additional or Deputy Registrar of Trade Unions, and
(viii)
(ii) in relation to any Trade Union, the Registrar appointed for the State in which the head or
registered office, as the case may be, of the Trade Union is situated;]
(g) “trade dispute” means any dispute between employers and workmen or between workmen
and workmen, or between employers and employers which is connected with the employment
or non-employment, or the terms of employment or the conditions of labour, of any person,
and “workmen” means all persons employed in trade or industry whether or not in the
employment of the employer with whom the trade dispute arises; and
(h) “Trade Union” means any combination, whether temporary or permanent, formed
primarily for the purpose of regulating the relations between workmen and employers or
between workmen and workmen, or between employers and employers, or for imposing
restrictive conditions on the conduct of any trade or business, and includes any federation of
two or more Trade Unions:
4
[(2) The appropriate Government may appoint as many Additional and Deputy Registrars of
Trade Unions as it thinks fit for the purpose of exercising and discharging, under the
superintendence and direction of the Registrar, such powers and functions of the Registrar
under this Act as it may, by order, specify and define the local limits within which any such
Additional or Deputy Registrar shall exercise and discharge the powers and functions so
specified.
Powers of Registrar
The Registrar has power to enquire about the legality of the new election of the office-bearers
of a Trade Union; Mohan Lal v. Registrar of Trade Unions, 1983 Lab IC 1883.
4. Mode of Registration.
1
[(1)] Any seven or more members of a Trade Union may, by subscribing their names to the
rules of the Trade Union and by otherwise complying with the provisions of this Act with
respect to registration, apply for registration of the Trade Union under this Act:
Provided that no Trade Union of workmen shall be registered unless at least ten per cent. or
one hundred of the workmen, whichever is less, engaged or employed in the establishment or
industry with which it is connected are the members of such Trade Union on the date of
making of application for registration.
5. Application for registration.
(1) Every application for registration of a Trade Union shall be made to the Registrar and shall
be accompanied by a copy of the rules of the Trade Union and a statement of the following
particulars, namely:—
(a) the names, occupations and address of the members making application;
(aa) in the case of a Trade Union of workmen, the names, occupations and addresses of the
place of work of the members of the Trade Union making the application;
(b) the name of the Trade Union and the address of its head office; and
(c) the titles, names, ages, addresses and occupations of the 2 [office-bearers] of the Trade
Union.
6. Provisions to be contained in the rule of a Trade Union.
A Trade Union shall not be entitled to registration under this Act, unless the executive thereof
is constituted in accordance with the provisions of this Act, and the rules thereof provide for
the following matters, namely:—
(a) the name of the Trade Union;
(b) the whole of the objects for which the Trade Union has been established;
(c) the whole of the purposes for which the general funds of the Trade Union shall be
applicable, all of which purposes shall be purposes to which such funds are lawfully applicable
under this Act;
(d) the maintenance of a list of the members of the Trade Union and adequate facilities for the
inspection thereof by the 1 [office-bearers] and members of Trade Union;
(e) the admission of ordinary members who shall be persons actually engaged or employed in
an industry with which the Trade Union is connected, and also the admission of the number of
honorary or temporary members as 1 [office-bearers] required under section 22 to form the
executive of the Trade Union;
(ee) the payment of a minimum subscription by members of the Trade Union which shall not
be less than—
(i) one rupee per annum for rural workers;
(ii) three rupees per annum for workers in other unorganised sectors; and
(iii) twelve rupees per annum for workers in any other case;
(f) the conditions under which any member shall be entitled to any benefit assured by the rules
and under which any fine or forfeiture may be imposed on the members;
(g) the manner in which the rules shall be amended, varied or rescinded;
(h) the manner in which the members of the executive and the other 1 [office-bearers] of the
Trade Union shall be 3 [elected] and removed;
(hh) the duration of period being not more than three years, for which the members of the
executive and other office-bearers of the Trade Union shall be elected;
(i) the safe custody of the funds of the Trade Union, an annual audit, in such manner as may be
prescribed, of the accounts thereof, and adequate facilities for the inspection of the account
books by the 1[office-bearers] and members of the Trade Union; and
(j) the manner in which the Trade Union may be dissolved.
(2) If the name under which a Trade Union is proposed to be registered is identical with that by
which any other existing Trade Union has been registered or, in the opinion of the Registrar, so
nearly resembles such name as to be likely to deceive the public or the members of either
Trade Union, the Registrar shall require the persons applying for registration to alter the name
of the Trade Union stated in the application, and shall refuse to register the Union until such
alteration has been made.
8. Registration.
The Registrar, on being satisfied that the Trade Union has complied with all the requirements
of this Act in regard to registration, shall register the Trade Union by entering in a register, to
be maintained in such form as may be prescribed, the particulars relating to the Trade Union
contained in the statement accompanying the application for registration.
9. Certificate of registration.
11. Appeal.
(b) the payment of expenses for the administration of the Trade Union, including audit of the
accounts of the general funds of the Trade Union;
(c) the prosecution or defence of any legal proceeding to which the Trade Union or any
member thereof is a party, when such prosecution or defence is undertaken for the purpose of
securing or protecting any rights of the Trade Union as such or any rights arising out of the
relations of any member with his employer or with a person whom the member employs;
(d) the conduct of trade disputes on behalf of the Trade Union or any member thereof;
(e) the compensation of members for loss arising out of trade disputes;
(f) allowances to members or their dependants on account of death, old age, sickness, accidents
or unemployment of such members;
(g) the issue of, or the undertaking of liability under, policies of assurance on the lives of
members, or (under) policies insuring members against sickness, accident or unemployment;
(h) the provision of education, social or religious benefits for members (including the payment
of the expenses of funeral or religious ceremonies for deceased members) or for the
dependants of members;
(i) the upkeep of a periodical published mainly for the purpose of discussing questions
affecting employers or workmen as such;
(j) the payment, in furtherance of any of the objects on which the general funds of the Trade
Union may be spent, of contributions to any cause intended to benefit workmen in general,
provided that the expenditure in respect of such contributions in any financial year shall not at
any time during that year be in excess of one-fourth of the combined total of the gross income
which has up to that time accrued to the general funds of the Trade Union during that year and
of the balance at the credit of those funds at the commencement of that year; and
(k) subject to any conditions contained in the notification, any other object notified by the
2[appropriate Government] in the Official Gazette.
State Amendment
(2) A registered Trade Union shall not be liable in any suit or other legal proceeding in any
Civil Court in respect of any tortuous act done in contemplation or furtherance of a trade
dispute by an agent of the Trade Union if it is proved that such person acted without the
knowledge of, or contrary to express instructions given by, the executive of the Trade Union.
Provided that nothing in this section shall enable any Civil Court to entertain any legal
proceeding instituted for the express purpose of enforcing or recovering damages for the
breach of any agreement concerning the conditions on which any members of a Trade Union
shall or shall not sell their goods, transact business, work, employ or be employed
(ii) he has been convicted by a Court in India of any offence involving moral turpitude and
sentenced to imprisonment, unless a period of five years has elapsed since his release.
(2) Any member of the executive or other office-bearer of a registered Trade Union who,
before the commencement of the Indian Trade Unions (Amendment) Act, 1964, has been
convicted of any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced to imprisonment, shall on
the date of such commencement cease to be such member or office-bearer unless a period of
five years has elapsed since his release before that date.]
2
[(3) In its application to the State of Jammu and Kashmir, reference in sub-section (2) to the
commencement of the Indian Trade Unions (Amendment) Act, 1964, shall be construed as
reference to the commencement of this Act in the said State.]
Provided that the appropriate Government may, by special or general order, declare that the
provisions of this section shall not apply to any Trade Union or class of Trade Unions specified
in the order.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, “unorganised sector” means any sector which
the appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify.
(2) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (1), all office-bearers of a registered Trade
Union, except not more than one-third of the total number of the office-bearers or five,
whichever is less, shall be persons actually engaged or employed in the establishment or
industry with which the Trade Union is connected.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, an employee who has retired or has been
retrenched shall not be construed as outsider for the purpose of holding an office in a Trade
Union.
(3) No member of the Council of Ministers or a person holding an office of profit (not being an
engagement or employment in an establishment or industry with which the Trade Union is
connected), in the Union or a State, shall be a member of the executive or other office-bearer
of a registered Trade Union.]
(3) Save as provided in sub-section (2), the Registrar shall, if he is satisfied that the provisions
of this Act in respect of change of name have been complied with, register the change of name
in the register referred to in section 8, and the change of name shall have effect from the date
of such registration.
(4) The Registrar of the State in which the head office of the amalgamated Trade Union is
situated shall, if he is satisfied that the provisions of this Act in respect of amalgamation have
been complied with and that the Trade Union formed thereby is entitled to registration under
section 6, register the Trade Union in the manner provided in section 8, and the amalgamation
shall have effect from the date of such registration.
(2) An amalgamation of two or more registered Trade Unions shall not prejudice any right of
any of such Trade Unions or any right of a creditor of any of them.
27. Dissolution.
(1) When a registered Trade Union is dissolved, notice of the dissolution signed by seven
members and by the Secretary of the Trade Union shall, within fourteen days of the dissolution
be sent to the Registrar, and shall be registered by him if he is satisfied that the dissolution has
been effected in accordance with the rules of the Trade Union, and the dissolution shall have
effect from the date of such registration.
(2) Where the dissolution of a registered Trade Union has been registered and the rules of the
Trade Union do not provide for the distribution of funds of the Trade Union on dissolution, the
Registrar shall divide the funds amongst the members in such manner as may be prescribed
28. Returns
1) There shall be sent annually to the Registrar, on or before such date as may be prescribed, a
general statement, audited in the prescribed manner, of all receipts and expenditure of every
registered Trade Union during the year ending on the 31st day of 1 [December] next preceding
such prescribed date, and of the assets and liabilities of the Trade Union existing on such 31st
day of 1 [December]. The statement shall be prepared in such form and shall comprise such
particulars as may be prescribed.
(2) Together with the general statement there shall be sent to the Registrar a statement showing
changes of 2 [office-bearers] made by the Trade Union during the year to which the general
statement refers together also with a copy of the rules of the Trade Union corrected up to the
date of the despatch thereof to the Registrar.
(3) A copy of every alteration made in the rules of a registered Trade Union shall be sent to the
Registrar within fifteen days of the making of the alteration.
3
[(4) For the purpose of examining the documents referred to in sub-sections (1), (2) and (3),
the Registrar, or any officer authorised by him by general or special order, may at all
reasonable times inspect the certificate of registration, account books, registers, and other
documents, relating to a Trade Union, at its registered office or may require their production at
such place as he may specify in this behalf, but no such place shall be at a distance of more
than ten miles from the registered office of a Trade Union.]
Chapter – IV :Regulations
29. Power to make regulations.
(1) 1 [***] The 2 [appropriate Government] may make regulations for the purpose of carrying
into effect the provisions of this Act.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such
regulations may provide for all or any of the following matters namely:—
(a) the manner in which Trade Unions and the rules of Trade Unions shall be registered and the
fees payable on registration;
(b) the transfer of registration in the case of any registered Trade Union which has changed its
head office from one State to another;
(c) the manner in which, and the qualifications by whom, the accounts of registered Trade
Unions or of any class of such Unions shall be audited;
(d) the conditions subject to which inspection of documents kept by Registrars shall be allowed
and the fees which shall be chargeable in respect of such inspections; and
3
[(3) Every notification made by the Central Government under sub-section (1) of section 22,
and every regulation made by it under sub-section (1) shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is
made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days
which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before
the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions
aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the notification or regulation, or
both Houses agree that the notification or regulation should not be made, the notification or
regulation shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case
may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the
validity of anything previously done under that notification or regulation.
(4) Every notification made by the State Government under sub-section (1) of section 22 and
every regulation made by it under sub-section (1) shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is
made, before the State Legislature.]
(3) Regulations as made shall be published in the Official Gazette, and on such publication
shall have effect as if enacted in this Act.
Provided that the aggregate fine shall not exceed fifty rupees.
(2) Any person who wilfully makes, or causes to be made, any false entry in, or any omission
from, the general statement required by section 28 or in or from any copy of rules or of
alterations of rules sent to the Registrar under that section, shall be punishable with fine which
may extend to five hundred rupees.
● No Court shall take cognizance of any offence under this Act, unless complaint thereof has
been made by, or with the previous sanction of, the Registrar or, in the case of an offence
under section 32, by the person to whom the copy was given, within six months of the date
on which the offence is alleged to have been committed.
Latest Amendements to Trade Unions Act,1926 in the year 2001.
Important amendments are made to section 22 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926. A very important
amendment by Act 31 of 2001 took effect from 9.1.02 in sec 22 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926.
This section deals with the proportion of office bearers to be connected with the industry. Before
amendment, section 22 provided that not less than one half of the office bearers of a TU, shall have
to be persons actually engaged or employed in the industry with which the TU is connected. For
example if there are 20 office bearers in a TU, at least 10 [could be more] have to be from the
industry and 10 could be from outside.
This provision has been retained for the unorganized sector unions as per amended sec 22(1). The
appropriate government will have to specify which will be unorganized sectors.
A new Sub section 2 of section 22, which has been introduced after the amendment, stipulates that
in other than unorganized sector unions, all office bearers except not more than one third or five
whichever is less, should be from the industry i.e. outsiders can be office bearers only up to one
third of total office bearers or five whichever is less. For instance, if the TU has 21 office bearers
posts, not more than 7 can be outsiders. Since 7 is more than 5, only up to 5 [whichever is less]
office bearers can be outsiders and rest 16 will have to be from the industry itself.
Note: We must remember that the no. for outsiders is maximum and it could be less than that also.
A new Sub section 3 has been introduced to section 22 and this is as under:
“ No member of the council of ministers or a person holding an office of profit [ not being an
engagement or employment in an establishment or industry with which the TU is connected] in the
union or a state, shall be a member of the executive or other office bearer of the union.
A new section 9A has also been introduced by the act 31 of 2001 w.e.f 9.1.02 and it reads as under:
“ A registered TU of workmen shall at all times continue to have not less than 10 percent or 100 of
the workmen whichever is less, subject to minimum of 7, engaged or employed in an establishment
or industry with which it is connected, as its members.”
e.g. Suppose in an industry there are 2000 workmen. A TU can be registered in this industry if it has
at least 100 members as 10% is more i.e. 200.
In another industry, there are 60 workmen.10% will be 6. But minimum no. of members has to be 7.
--------------
The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
The objective of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act,1946 is to require the employers
to define with sufficient precision the conditions of employment under them and the said conditions
known to the workmen employed by them.
Prior to the enactment of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, the
conditions of employment in the industrial establishments were governed by contracts between
employer and his workmen without the interference of the state. Non-interference by the State
caused the employers to lay down the conditions of the employment of their choice. The conditions
laid down by the employer promoted the interests of the employer but ignored the interests of the
workmen.
In many cases the conditions of employment were not reduced to writing, and were governed
by oral agreements. Thus, the conditions of employment in many cases were not well defined prior
to the enactment of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.
(2) The appellate authority shall, within seven days of its order under sub-section (1), send copies
thereof to the Certifying Officer, to the employer and to the trade union or other prescribed
representatives of the workmen, accompanied, unless it has confirmed without amendment the
standing orders as certified by the Certifying Officer, by copies of the standing orders as certified
by it and authenticated in the prescribed manner.
7. Date of operation of Standing Orders
Standing orders shall, unless an appeal is preferred under Sec. 6, come into operation on the expiry
of thirty days from the date on which authenticated copies thereof are sent under sub-section (3) of
Sec. 5, or where an appeal as aforesaid is preferred, on the expiry of seven days from the date on
which copies of the order of the appellate authority are sent under sub-section (2) of Sec. 6.
8. Register of Standing Orders
A copy of all standing orders as finally certified under this Act shall be filed by the Certifying
Officer in a register in the prescribed form maintained for the purpose, and the Certifying Officer
shall furnish a copy thereof to any person applying there for on payment of the prescribed fee.
9. Posting of Standing Orders
The text of the standing orders as finally certified under this Act shall be prominently posted by the
employer in English and in the language understood by the majority of his workmen on special
boards to be maintained for the purpose at or near the entrance through which the majority of the
workmen enter the industrial establishment and in all departments thereof where the workmen are
employed.
10 Duration and modification of Standing Orders
A modification of a Certified Standing Orders within six months of its coming into operation is
permissible only on an agreement between the employer and his workmen. Likewise a modification
of certified standing orders within six months of its last modification is permissible only on an
agreement between employer and his workmen.
Certified Standing orders is subject to modification ordinarily only after the expiry of six months
from the date on which the Standing orders or the last modification thereof came into operation.
After the expiry of six months, an employer or workmen or a trade union or other representative
body of the workmen may apply for the modification of the certified standing orders. An
application for modification of the Standing orders must be accompanied by five copies of the
modification proposed to be made.
10A Payment of subsistence allowance
Where any workman is suspended by the employer pending investigation or inquiry into complaints
or charges of misconduct against him, the employer shall pay to such workman subsistence
allowance.
(a) At the rate of fifty percent of the wages which the workman was entitled to immediately
preceding the date of such suspension, for the first ninety days of suspension; and
(b) At the rate of seventy-five per cent. of such wages for the remaining period of suspension if the
delay in the completion of disciplinary proceedings against such workman is not directly
attributable to the conduct of such workman.
(2) If any dispute arises regarding the subsistence allowance payable to a workman under
subsection (1), the workman or the employer concerned may refer the dispute to the Labour Court
constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) within the local limits of whose
jurisdiction the industrial establishment wherein such workman is employed is situate and the
Labour Court to which the dispute is so referred shall, after giving the parties an opportunity of
being heard, decide the dispute and such decision shall be final and binding on the parties.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, where
provisions relating to payment of subsistence allowance under any other law for the time being in
force in any State are more beneficial than the provisions of this section, the provisions of such
other law shall be applicable to the payment of subsistence allowance in that State.
THE SCHEDULE
Sources of Regulations:
The main statutes which regulate termination of employment are the Industrial Employment
(Standing Orders) Act (IESA), 1946, and the Industrial Disputes Act (IDA), 1947, as amended.
Some States have also passed legislation dealing with dismissal.
Regulations concerning termination of employment are also found in standing orders made pursuant
to the IESA. Standing orders are written documents dealing with terms and conditions of
employment. Drafted by employers in all establishments, standing orders are documents on which
trade unions or workers are given an opportunity to object. They are certified by the government
Certifying Officer who adjudicates upon the fairness and reasonableness of the provisions of any
standing order and upon its conformity to the model standing order (MSO).
Another source of regulation is the case law of the courts. Any questions arising from the
application or the interpretation of a standing order can be raised before the Labour Court and its
decision will be final and binding (sec. 17(2), IDA).
Scope of legislation
The IESA applies to all industrial establishments employing 100 workers or more (sec. 1(3)). The
IESA (sec. 2(i)) and IDA (sec. 2(s)) both exclude managerial and administrative employees, those
in supervisory positions earning more than a specified statutory amount, as well as members of the
Air Force, Army and Police services who are covered by specific legislation.
Contracts of employment
Workers are classified as permanent, probationers, badlis (a “badli” means a worker appointed in
the post of a permanent worker or probationer who is temporarily absent), temporary, casual and
apprentices (sec. 2, MSO).
Termination of employment
The contract of employment can terminate, not at the initiative of the employer, in certain
circumstances, including by:
● Mutual agreement;
● Resignation by the employee;
● Employee’s retirement; and
● The expiry of a fixed-term contract.
Dismissal
The law relating to termination of employment in India distinguishes broadly between three
different situations: dismissal for misconduct, discharge and retrenchment. Indian law starts from
the common law premise that an employer has a right to terminate the services of an employee
without giving a reason. However, this position has been affected by legislative intervention and by
the development by the courts of natural justice requirements.
As regards termination of employment for disciplinary reasons, some instances of misconduct
which may justify dismissal without notice and any compensation in lieu of notice are listed in the
MSO(Model Standing Orders) and include (secs. 14(2)-(3), MSO):
14. wilful insubordination or disobedience;
15. theft, fraud or dishonesty;
16. wilful damage or loss of employer’s property;
17. bribery;
18. habitual lateness or absence; and
19. striking unlawfully.
The IDA (Industrial Disputes Act,1947) sets out detailed procedural requirements for retrenchment
which is defined as the termination by the employer of employment of a worker for any reason,
other than disciplinary, with certain exceptions (sec. 2 (oo), IDA) “Retrenchment” corresponds
broadly to terminations based on economic grounds or related to the employee’s capacity (except
retirements, dismissals for ill health and the expiry of fixed-term contracts).
Thus, the concept of discharge at will can be said to apply only to employees not covered by the
IDA, and not dismissed for misconduct.
Termination of employment is unlawful if it is for reasons related to trade union membership or
activity; filing complaints concerning the employer; race, colour, sex, marital status, pregnancy,
religion, political opinion or social origin. In addition, termination of employment in violation of
fair labour practices as defined by legislation or case law will not be valid. The IDA (Fifth
Schedule) lists some practices which will be considered to be “Unfair Labour Practices”. These
include dismissal on account of trade union activity or membership; dismissal by way of
victimization; dismissal not in good faith but in “the colourable exercise of the employer’s rights”;
dismissal by falsely implicating a worker in a criminal case or on false or trumped-up allegations of
absence without leave, dismissal without due regard to natural justice or for minor misconduct
leading to disproportionate punishment. The list is not exhaustive.
The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, provides that absence from work during maternity leave, as
allowed under the statute, should not be considered as a valid reason for termination of service.
Similarly, employees may not be dismissed or discharged while they are in receipt of a sickness
benefit or disablement benefit for temporary disablement or are receiving medical treatment for
sickness or are absent from work as a result of certified illness arising out of pregnancy (sec. 73,
Employees’ State Insurance Act).
Notice and prior procedural safeguards
Under the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act,1946 employers are required to give in
writing one month’s notice or payment in lieu of such notice in order to lawfully terminate the
employment of permanent monthly-paid workers. The two weeks’ notice is required for workers
paid on other basis. Notice is not required either for probationers, badlis or temporary workers (sec.
13, MSO).
Notice is not required for workers found guilty of serious misconduct such as would constitute
summary dismissal. In case of dismissal on disciplinary grounds, the worker must be given an
opportunity of explaining the charges of misconduct alleged against him/her (sec. 13(2), MSO).
Furthermore, despite the fact that an employer is entitled to dismiss an employee for serious
misconduct or inadequate performance of work, the rules of natural justice have now influenced
labour law jurisprudence in India to the extent that the employer will be required to give the
employee a “hearing” to answer the charges before the dismissal is effected. This may take the form
of a written complaint to initiate departmental proceedings with a view to disciplinary proceedings,
and the hearing may be a mere explanation from the employee or may be a full departmental
inquiry into the matter with the necessary documentary evidence. Questions into the legality of
dismissal due to misconduct often hinge on the nature of this internal inquiry and the Indian courts,
in the interest of good industrial relations, have consistently affirmed the need for the usual rules of
natural justice to apply. Central to these rules are the requirements that the employee has a fair
hearing, including the right to adduce evidence on his or her behalf and to cross-examine witnesses,
and that the hearing be free from bias. An employee who faces a charge of misconduct may also
generally expect only a warning if it is a first offence or is not habitual conduct. Where a matter
relating to termination is pending before a conciliatory or adjudicatory body, the conditions
applicable to the worker may not be altered (sec. 33, IDA).
Under sec. 25F o f the IDA, an employer proposing to retrench workers, who have been
continuously employed for more than one year, must give one month’s notice or pay in lieu of such
notice to the worker, and must also notify the relevant governmental authority, giving the reasons
for the proposed retrenchment.
Special provisions under the IDA are applicable in relation to industrial establishments employing
100 workers or more. In this case, workers may not be retrenched unless three months’ written
notice, stating reasons for the retrenchment, or pay in lieu of notice, is given to the worker. In
addition, the employer must seek prior authorization from the relevant governmental authority
before the retrenchment can be carried out (sec. 25N, IDA).
The concept of “prior authorization” in this context perhaps needs some elaboration here. The
Supreme Court of India has recognized the right of management to run its own business as it
pleases without any interference by the courts. The decision to retrench is thus left solely up to the
discretion of management. The court will inquire only into the closure to verify that it is bona fide
and for economic reasons and will not question the motive behind it. The concept of a bona fide
redundancy does not, for example, include a situation where retrenchment is carried out in
accordance with unfair labour practices or to victimize workers. Consequently, the proper
governmental authority is required to examine the reasons given in the notice for the proposed
retrenchment to ascertain whether they are in accordance with good labour practice and are for bona
fide reasons of redundancy. If this is not found to be so, the governmental authority may refuse
permission for the retrenchment, giving its reasons in writing.
In the absence of any agreement between the employer and the workers retrenched as regards the
procedure for retrenchment, the employer retrenches the worker who was the last person to be
employed in the category, unless for reasons to be recorded the employer retrenches any other
worker (sec. 25G, IDA).
Severance pay
In case of retrenchments, employees with more than one year’s service, and other than temporary or
casual employees, are entitled to compensation equivalent to 15 days’ pay for each completed year
of service (sec. 25F(b), IDA).
However, a distinction is made for cessation of business for reasons beyond the control of the
employer. This might include force majeure, frustration of contract, etc., but does not include
financial difficulties or loss of stock. In such circumstances, the employee is still entitled to a
redundancy payment, but the amount is less than that given for termination of employment due to
other reasons, being a sum equivalent to no more than the average of three months’ pay (sec.
25FFF, IDA).
Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, a worker continuously employed for five years or more is
entitled to a gratuity payment upon termination of service, except where such termination has been
as a result of his or her wilful omission or negligence resulting in damage or loss of the employer’s
property, in which case the gratuity is forfeited to the extent of the damage caused. Where the
employee has been dismissed on account of his or her riotous, violent or disorderly conduct or for
an offence involving moral turpitude committed in the course of employment, the gratuity shall be
wholly or partly forfeited. The sum is calculated at 15 days’ average pay for every completed year
of service.
Avenues for redress
Since the 1965 amendments to the IDA (sec. 2A), the dismissal or retrenchment of an individual is
deemed to be an industrial dispute, hence the ability of a worker to take his or her claim to the
Labour Courts. Under sec. 2(a) o f the IESA, a worker dissatisfied with his or her termination of
employment is entitled, in the first instance, to raise the matter as a labour dispute with an officer
from the conciliation department of the Ministry of Labour. The officer will attempt to conciliate
the matter and must submit a report to the Government if conciliation fails, pending a decision from
the governmental authority on whether the matter merits adjudication before the Labour Court or
Tribunal.
Challenges to dismissal can be made to the Labour Court under sec. 11A o f the Industrial Relations
(Amendment) Disputes Act, 1971. The Labour Court may review a termination of employment and
set aside a dismissal if it decides that the dismissal was not justified.
No time limit is prescribed within which an aggrieved worker may raise a labour dispute. However,
excessive delay may prejudice a worker’s case. The burden of proving that dismissal was for a valid
reason rests with the employer.
The Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal and National Tribunal have wide discretion to review
disputes relating to termination of employment, including the examination of the evidence, and to
award relief as they see fit including compensation in the form of damages and reinstatement (sec.
11A, IDA). Before reinstating an employee, the judicial body will inquire into the feasibility of
reinstatement; for example, whether the employee has lost confidence in the employer and whether
industrial peace and harmony will be threatened.
EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT
DOMESTIC ENQUIRY
Objective: To highlight the procedure for a fair and proper domestic enquiry as per requirements of
law.
Why we go for domestic enquiry?
In today’s context no employer can discharge or dismiss a delinquent workman even for a serious
misconduct without following an elaborate procedure for taking disciplinary action.
It is only when the workmen is found guilty of the charge in an enquiry conducted as per the
principal of natural justice, that the employer after following the procedure can punish him as per
the company’s standing orders.
Principal of natural justice:
No man shall be the judge in his own cause
Both sides shall be heard.
Rules of natural justice:
The employee proceeded against had been informed clearly of the charges levelled against him.
The witnesses are examined ordinarily in the presence of the employee in respect of the charges
The employee is given fair opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses
The employee has been given reasonable opportunity to defend.
Suppose the employer has dismissed/ discharged a workman after following the procedure,
conducting a fair and proper enquiry.
Now the question is whether his decision can be challenged?
The answer is yes. Decision can be challenged by the workmen under section 2-A of the ID Act,
1947 by raising an industrial dispute and for this he need not have support of any trade union or
other workmen. However, if an employee is not a workman he cannot raise industrial dispute under
the ID Act.
The question of bonafides (genuine) may be raised and it will be open to the court to consider
whether the employer had acted bona fide or was actuated by the desire to victimize the workman.
Now again you have to prove the genuineness of the decision. In case tribunal finds that
management was motivated or has acted with unnecessary harassment, or there was victimization or
unfair labour practice than what?
The tribunal or LC may interfere into quantum of punishment (11-A-I.D.Act), may order
reinstatement of the worker with back wages.
Basic error of fact
If the findings at the enquiry is based on extraneous (irrelevant) matter or if the workman is found
guilty and punished on a charge not disclosed in the charge sheet
The management will be guilty of committing basic error of the fact.
Procedure of holding a domestic enquiry-
*A workman against whom an enquiry is to be held is to be given a charge-sheet clearly stating the
charges levelled against him and asking him to submit his explanation.
* Management has to appoint Enquiry Officer (EO) & Management Representative (MR) for the
enquiry as per the charge sheet.
(Copy of the same is to be marked / given to the Delinquent Employee)
* Enquiry Officer(EO) will inform about the date on which the enquiry has to be start in
writing from his side.
*Management reserves the right to suspend the workman pending enquiry depending upon the
gravity of the charges.
* Workman is permitted to defend himself by other workman or by an office bearer of Trade Union
of which he is a member-defence Representative (DR).
*In Domestic enquiry - starts with the recording of the statements & letters as per the charge sheet.
The workman is allowed to produce witnesses in his defence and cross examine the witness of the
Management. EO shall record the concise summary of the evidences & questions & answers asked
by the both the parties.
* The proceedings of the inquiry shall be conducted in English, hindi or in the language of the state
where the Industrial establishment is located, or the language which is understood by the delinquent
employee.
* After it is over, sometimes it takes a year or more- EO should submit his findings giving brief
reasons.
* On the receipt of the finding report from EO , the Management should give a letter to workman
along with the finding report of EO for his explanation.
* On the receipt of the same, Management can accord punishments to the workman found guilty of
misconduct. Here they are four types of punishments viz.,
1. Dismissal without any notice
2. Suspension for a period of not more than 4 days.
3. Fine
4. Warning or Censure.
* The doctrine of proof beyond doubt as applicable in criminal trial is not applicable here. This is as
per the judgement held in High Court Judicature of Bombay v/s Udaysingh Ganpatrao,1997/CLR
1122 S.C.
1. A show cause letter is a letter provided to the employee to explain the alleged misconduct. The
warning letter is a statement of punishment to the employee when the employer is not satisfied with
the explanation given by the employee to the show cause letter.
2. No implications. However, if the employer is unhappy over the reasons you cite in the response
to the show cause letter, then they can take action against you. (Warning letter, Termination). The
degree of punishment depends on the severity of the misconduct. Past misconduct can also be taken
into consideration do decide on the punishment for future misconduct.
3. No. Your employer need not respond to your show cause letter if he is satisfied with your
explanation. The employer has a choice of whether he wants to issue a show cause letter or to
conduct a DI.
4. No you should not worry about the DI. Considering that you have not been provided with a
warning letter for your previous offense, it is obvious that your explanation has been accepted and
you have been given a chance to prove yourself. Put the incident behind you and move on.
5. If you continue coming late for work, your employer can issue you with a warning letter. If the
employer is not able to tolerate your repeated late coming, then he may terminate you.
6. A DI is not mandatory although it is recommended. You can also be dismissed on the strength of
a show cause letter, without a DI.
7.
Show cause --> Warning (if dissatisfied with explanation) or
show cause --> DI --> Punishment (Depending on severity) or
warning letter --> punishment (repeat offenders)
The employer will conduct a DI just to provide a warning letter as a punishment. The severity of the
case is definitely taken into consideration before the conduct of a DI, which is cumbersome and
expensive. For example, if the misconduct is of a minor nature that may equate to a warning letter
as a punishment, then it won’t require a DI. For more extreme cases that may end in termination,
then it is best to resort to the DI to justify the need for termination.
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
Why indiscipline?
● Ignorance of rules,
● Physical/ mental incapability
● Absence of proper training
● Discontented workmen
● Misguidance by Trade Union leaders
● Absence of standard policies of handling discipline
● Uncongenial working conditions
Indiscipline requiring action
● Absenteeism
● Habitual Late coming
● Overstaying leave
● Disobeying rules/ standing orders
● Insubordination
● Misappropriation of funds or valuables
● Misconduct
Procedures
1. Standing Orders framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 to be
followed.
2. Ensure principle of natural justice.
3. Serving Charge sheet
4. Holding of Domestic Enquiry
5. Serving Shaw Cause Notice
6. Order of punishment
7. Charge Sheet
8. Memorandum of charges
9. Statement of allegations of misconduct/ omission/ negligence
No particular format prescribed for charge sheet in any Labour enactment
The object is to give the employee exact idea of the misconduct committed by him so that he may
get reasonable opportunity to defend.
Requisites of Charge sheet
1. It should contain complete picture of misconduct
2. It should state that the act of commission or omission resulting in misconduct is violation of
a particular clause of standing order
3. Language to be as per Standing Orders or as required by the delinquent
4. Enclose a list of witnesses in support of charges
Be specific
● Charges levelled should be specifically stated- avoid ‘etc...Etc’/ ‘other’/ ‘any’/ ‘some
people’ like expressions.
● The amount misappropriated should be specific sum and not ‘ around’
● Person manhandled should be Mr./Ms. X and not ‘ someone’
● Time of misconduct should be exact- avoid ‘around’ time.
● Charge sheet for using offending language should contain the exact word used.
Domestic Enquiry
● Follow rules laid down in Standing Orders
● Purpose of domestic enquiry -
● Provide delinquent an opportunity to defend the charges
● Provide employer an opportunity to evaluate the situation and decide the penalty to be
imposed
Notice of Enquiry to be served
1. Notice to show the Date and Time of enquiry
2. Venue of holding enquiry
3. Name of the Enquiry Officer
4. Notice to be served in the same manner as followed to serve charge sheet
5. Workman shall have right to appoint a Defence Helper
6. When legally trained person represents management in enquiry, workman shall also be
allowed to be represented by lawyer (Hindustan Teleprinters Ltd Vs Mr. Rajan Isaac.)
Recording the Evidences
Not mandatory that procedure laid down in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or the Evidence
Act, 1872 to be followed. (Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs Sunil Yeshwant Pandit and another )
● Question- Answer pattern may be followed
● Statement of Management to be taken first
● Cross examination by employee/ helper
● Take signature of the concerned on record
● Examine and cross examine witnesses
● Object/ Disallow irrelevant questions
Show Cause Notice
Before punishment is initiated a Show Cause Notice highlighting the charges, findings of the
enquiry and possible penalty imposed on the delinquent shall also be served calling on him to show
cause ‘why action including discharge or (even dismissal) shall not be taken against’ the delinquent.
Though serving of such notice will not make the process of enquiry invalid (as decided in S.
Shenbagaraj Vs Additional Commissioner of Industries and Commerce, Chepauk and others.), it is
advisable to give the employee a final opportunity before punishment is inflicted.
Enquiry report to be furnished to the employee
Order of Punishment
Principles of natural justice to be followed
Punishment should not violate section 73 of the ESI Act - notice of dismissal or discharge given to
an employee during the period the employee is in receipt of sickness, maternity or other benefit
shall be invalid.
Order issued without holding a domestic enquiry or after holding a defective enquiry will not stand
since Labour Court/ Tribunal can interfere with such order as provided u/s 11A of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947
Notice of enquiry
To Date:
--------
Sub: Enquiry u/r ___ of Standing Orders
Ref: Charge sheet No.____ dated______
Your explanation dated____
Since the explanation given by you as cited above is found unsatisfactory, a domestic enquiry u/r
____ of the Standing Orders has been initiated to decide on the charges.
The enquiry will commence at 9.30 am on ___ (date) at _____ (venue)
You are hereby required to present in person with or without a helper to give any clarification to
defend the charges against you.
Mr./Ms. ____ will be the Enquiry Officer.
Sd/-
Authorised Signatory
Enquiry Proceedings
Enquiry proceedings in to the charge sheet No____ dated ___ issued to Mr.___
Termination Order
To Date
--------
Sub: Order of Termination of Service
Ref: Charge sheet No____ dated____
Pursuant to the charge sheet above referred and findings of enquiry report dated____, the
management has come to the conclusion that the charges leveled against you have been proved
categorically.
As you have been found guilty of serious misconduct, the management has decided to dismiss you
from service. However, on compassionate grounds, we have decided to take a lenient step by
imposing a lesser punishment by discharging you from service with effect from/ with immediate
effect.
You are, therefore, directed to settle your dues including salary dues and handover the charges to
Mr________ during office hours on_________
Sd/-
Authorised Signatory
THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT,1923
The object of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 is to provide for compensation payable by
the employer to the workman who suffers an injury from an accident arising out of and in the course
of employment. The growing complexity of industry in this country, with the increasing use of
machinery and consequent danger to workmen, along with the comparative poverty of the workmen
themselves, renders it advisable that they should be protected as far as possible, from hardship
arising from accident.
Before the Constitution came into force, the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 was enacted
during the British reign by the recommendation of Royal Commission on Labour. Before enacting
this Act, the workmen were compelled to file the petitions for compensation before the Civil
Courts. The Civil Courts are fixed with rigid procedural laws, such as Civil Procedure Code, 1908,
The Limitation Act, 1963, The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, etc. Long time was usually taken for
granting the compensation to the injured workman or the poor dependants of the deceased workman
by the Civil Courts due to their rigid formalities and technicalities.
The Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 radically changed the law relating to compensation
payable by the employer to his workman for employment injury. Prior to the enactment of the
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 the employer was liable to pay compensation for employment
injury. Prior to the enactment of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, the employer was liable
to pay compensation for employment injury resulting in the death or disablement of the workman if
it was attributed to the negligence of the employer. Even in cases of proved negligence of employer
the workman was denied compensation if the workman was found to be guilty of contributing
negligence. Whereas under the Workmen's compensation Act,1923, the employer is liable to pay
compensation for the personal injury if it results in the death or disablement of the workman
irrespective of the negligence on the part of employer or contributory negligence on the part of the
workman.
Important objectives of the Act:
1.It gives cheap and quick remedy to the injured workman or the dependants of the deceased
workman.
2.Civil Courts are excluded.
3.The Commissioner is empowered to grant immediate relief.
4.The Commissioner is not bound to follow the technicalities and formalities of the Court. He is
Quasi-judicial authority.
5.The Act clearly defines 'injury', 'workman', 'accident arising out of and in the course of
employment', methods for calculating the compensation, etc.
6.The definition of 'workman' given in this Act is very wider than any other labour legislation.
7.Fee prescribed on application is only nominal and lowest.
8.It is the first labour legislation in India.
9.Though the Act was enacted in1923, the spirit of the Constitution of India, 1950 is seen in it.
Important Sections of the Act:
CHAPTER I : PRELIMINARY
1. Short title extent and commencement (1) This Act may be called the Workmen's
Compensation Act 1923.
(ix) It extends to the whole of India.
(3) It shall come into force on the first day of July 1924.
● Definitions In this Act unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context -
(b) "Commissioner" means a Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation appointed under
section 20;
(c) "compensation" means compensation as provided for by this Act;
(d) "dependent" means any of the following relatives of a deceased workman namely:-
(i) a widow a minor legitimate or adopted son an unmarried legitimate or adopted
daughter or a widowed mother; and
(ii) if wholly dependent on the earnings of the workman at the time of his death a
son or a daughter who has attained the age of 18 years and who is infirm;
(iii) if wholly or in part dependant on the earnings of the workman at the time of his death-
(a) a widower
(b) a parent other than a widowed mother
(c) a minor illegitimate son an unmarried illegitimate daughter or a daughter
legitimate or illegitimate or adopted if married and a minor or if widowed and minor
(d) a minor brother or an unmarried sister or a widowed sister if a minor (e) a widowed
daughter-in-law
(f) a minor child of a pre-deceased son
(g) a minor child of a pre-deceased daughter where no parent of the child is alive or
(h) a paternal grandparent if no parent of the workman is alive;
(e) "employer" includes any body of persons whether incorporated or not and any managing agent
of an employer and the legal representative of a deceased employer and when the services of a
workman are temporarily lent or let on hire to another person by the person with whom the
workman has entered into a contract of service or apprenticeship means such other person while the
workman is working for him;
(f) "managing agent" means any person appointed or acting as the representative of another
person for the purpose of carrying on such other person's trade or business but does not include an
individual manager subordinate to an employer;
(ff) "minor" means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years;
(g) "partial disablement" means where the disablement is of a temporary nature such disablement
as reduces the earning capacity of a workman in any employment in which he was engaged at the
time of the accident resulting in the disablement and where the disablement is of a permanent nature
such disablement as reduces his earning capacity in every employment which he was capable of
undertaking at that time:
Provided that every injury specified in Part II of Schedule shall be deemed to result in permanent
partial disablement;
(h) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
(i) "qualified medical practitioner" means any person registered under any Central Act or an Act of
the Legislature of a State providing for the maintenance of a register of medical practitioners or in
any area where no such last-mentioned Act is in force any person declared by the State Government
by notification in the Official Gazette to be a qualified medical practitioner for the purpose of this
Act;
(k) "seaman" means any person forming part of the crew of any ship but does not include the
master of the ship;
(l) "total disablement" means such disablement whether of a temporary or permanent nature as
incapacitates a workman for all work which he was capable of performing at the time of the
accident resulting in such disablement : Provided that permanent total disablement shall be deemed
to result from every injury specified in Part I of Schedule I or from any combination of injuries
specified in Part II thereof where the aggregate percentage of the loss of earning capacity as
specified in the said Part II against those injuries amount to one hundred per cent or more;
(m) "wages" includes any privilege or benefit which is capable of being estimated in money other
than a travelling allowance or the value of any travelling concession or a contribution paid by the
employer of a workman towards any pension or provident fund or a sum paid to a workman to
cover any special expenses entailed on him by the nature of his employment;
(n) "workman" means any person (other than a person whose employment is of a casual nature
and who is employed otherwise than for the purposes of the employer's trade or business) who is -
4. Amount of compensation
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act the amount of compensation shall be as follows namely :-
where death results from the injury an amount equal to fifty per cent of the monthly wages of the
deceased workman multiplied by the relevant factor; or an amount of fifty thousand rupees
whichever is more; where permanent total disablement results from the injury an amount equal to
sixty per cent of the monthly wages of the injured workman multiplied by the relevant factor; or an
amount of sixty thousand rupees whichever is more.
6. Review:
Any half-monthly payment payable under this Act either under an agreement between the parties or
under the order of a Commissioner may be reviewed by the Commissioner on the application either
of the employer or of the workman accompanied by the certificate of a qualified medical
practitioner that there has been a change in the condition of the workman or subject to rules made
under this Act on application made without such certificate.
7. Commutation of half-monthly payments:
Any right to receive half-monthly payments may by agreement between the parties or if the parties
cannot agree and the payments have been continued for not less than six months on the application
of either party to the Commissioner be redeemed by the payment of a lump sum of such amount as
may be agreed to by the parties or determined by the Commissioner as the case may be.
8. Distribution of compensation:
(1) No payment of compensation in respect of a workman whose injury has resulted in death and
no payment of a lump sum as compensation to a woman or a person under a legal disability shall be
made otherwise than by deposit with the Commissioner and no such payment directly by an
employer shall be deemed to be a payment of compensation.
12. Contracting:
Where any person (hereinafter in this section referred to as the principal) in the course of or for the
purposes of his trade or business contract with any other person (hereinafter in this section referred
to as the contractor for the execution by or under the contractor of the whole or any part of any
work which is ordinarily part of the trade or business of the principal the principal shall be liable to
pay to any workman employed in the execution of the work any compensation which he would have
been liable to pay if that workman had been immediately employed by him.
13. Remedies of employer against stranger: Where a workman has recovered compensation in
respect of any injury caused under circumstances creating a legal liability of some person other than
the person by whom the compensation was paid to pay damages in respect thereof the person by
whom the compensation was paid and any person who has been called on to pay an indemnity
under section 12 shall be entitled to be indemnified by the person so liable to pay damages of
aforesaid.
14. Insolvency of employer: Where any employer has entered into a contract with any insurers in
respect of any liability under this Act to any workman then in the event of the employer becoming
insolvent or making a compensation or scheme of arrangement with his creditors or if the employer
is a company in the event of the company having commenced to be wound up the rights of the
employer against the insurers as respects that liability shall notwithstanding anything in any law for
the time being in force relating to insolvency or the winding up of companies be transferred to and
vest in the workman and upon any such transfer the insurers shall have the same rights and
remedies and be subject to the same liabilities as if they were the employer so however that the
insurers shall not be under any greater liability to the workman than they would have been under the
employer.
18. Proof of age: [Repealed by the Workmen's Compensation (Amendment) Act 1959,
(8 of 1959)]
18A. Penalties (1) Whoever – (a) fails to maintain a notice-book which he is required to maintain
under sub-section (3) of section 10 or
(b) fails to send to the Commissioner a statement which he is required to send under sub-section (1)
of section 10A or
(c) fails to send a report which he is required to send under section 10B or
(d) fails to make a return which he is required to make under section 16 shall be punishable with
fine which may extend to five thousand rupees.
(2) No prosecution under this section shall be instituted except by or with the previous sanction of a
Commissioner and no Court shall take cognizance of any offence under this section unless
complaint thereof is made within six months of the date on which the alleged commission of the
offence came to the knowledge of the Commissioner.
21. Venue of proceedings and transfer: Where any matter under this Act is to be done by or
before a Commissioner the same shall subject to the provisions of this Act and to any rules made
hereunder be done by or before the Commissioner for the area in which -
(a) the accident took place which resulted in the injury; or
(b) the workman or in case of his death the dependant claiming the compensation
ordinarily resides; or
(c) the employer has his registered office
26. Costs:
All costs incidental to any proceedings before a Commissioner shall subject to rules made under
this Act are in the discretion of the Commissioner.
27. Power of submit cases:
A Commissioner may if he thinks fit submit any question of law for the decision of the High Court
and if he does so shall decide the question in conformity with such decision.
31. Recovery:
The Commissioner may recover as an arrear of land revenue any amount payable by any person
under this Act whether under an agreement for the payment of compensation or otherwise and the
Commissioner shall be deemed to be a public officer within the meaning of section 5 of the
Revenue Recovery Act 1890 (1 of 1890).
32. Power of the State Government to make rules: The State Government may make rules to
carry out the purpose of this Act.
4. employed in the manufacture or handling of explosives in connection with the employer's trade
or business; or
5. employed in any mine as defined in clause (j) of section 2 of the Mines Act 1952 (35 of 1952) in
any mining operation or in any kind of work other than clerical work incidental to or connected
with any mining operation or with the mineral obtained or in any kind or work whatsoever below
ground; or
6.employed as the master or as a seaman of -
(a) any ship which is propelled wholly or in part by steam or other mechanical power of by
electricity or which is towed or intended to be towed by a ship so propelled; or (b) any ship not
included in sub-clause (a) of twenty-five tonnes net tonnage or over; or
(c) any sea-going ship not included in sub-clause (a) or sub-clause (b) provided with sufficient area
for navigation under sails alone; or
7 employed for the purpose of -
(a) loading unloading fuelling constructing repairing demolishing cleaning or painting any ship of
which he is not the master or a member of the crew or handling or transport within the limits of any
post subject to the Indian Ports Act 1908 (15 of 1908) or the Major Port Trusts Act 1963 (18 of
1963) of goods which have been discharged from or are to be loaded into any vessel; or
(b) warping a ship through the lock; or
(c) mooring and unmooring ships at harbour wall berths or in pier; or
(d) removing or replacing dry dock caissons when vessels are entering or leaving dry docks; or
(e) the docking or undocking of any vessel during an emergency; or
(f) preparing splicing chir springs and check wires painting depth marks on locksides removing or
replacing fenders whenever necessary landing of gangways maintaining lifebuoys up to standard or
any other maintenance work of a like nature; or
(g) any work on jolly boats for bringing a ship's line to the wharf; or
8 employed in the construction maintenance repair or demolition of -
(a) any building which is designed to be or is or has been more than one storey in height above the
ground or twelve feet or more from the ground level to the apex of the roof or
(b) any dam or embankment which is twelve feet or more in height from its lowest to its highest
point; or
(c) any road bridge tunnel or canal; or
(d) any wharf quay sea wall or other marine work including any moorings of ships; or
9 employed in setting up maintaining repairing or taking down any telegraph or telephone line or
post or any overhead electric line or cable or standard or fittings and fixtures for the same; or
10 employed otherwise than in a clerical capacity in the construction working repair or demolition
of any aerial ropeway canal pipeline or sewer; or
11 employed in the service of any fire brigade; or
12 employed upon a railway as defined in clause (31) of section 2 and sub-section (1) of section 197
of the Indian Railway Act 1989 (24 of 1989) either directly or through a sub-contractor by a person
fulfilling a contract with the railway administration; or
13 employed as an inspector mail guard sorter or van peon in the Railway Mail Service or as a
telegraphist or as a postal or railway signaller or employed in any occupation ordinarily involving
outdoor work in the Indian Posts and Telegraphs
Department; or
14 employed otherwise than in a clerical capacity in connection with operations for
winning natural petroleum or natural gas; or
15 employed in any occupation involving blasting operations; or
16 employed in the making of any excavation in which on any one day of the preceding twelve
months more than twenty-five persons have been employed or explosives have been used or whose
depth from its highest to its lowest point exceeds twelve feet; or
17 employed in the operation of any ferry boat capable of carrying more than ten person; or
18 employed otherwise than in a clerical capacity on any estate which is maintained for the purpose
of growing cardamom cinchona coffee rubber or tea and on which on any one day in the preceding
twelve months twenty-five or more persons have been so employed; or
19 employed otherwise than in a clerical capacity in the generating transforming transmitting or
distribution of electrical energy or in generation or supply of gas; or
20 employed in a lighthouse as defined in clause (d) of section 2 of the Indian Lighthouse Act 1927
(17 of 1927); or
21 employed in producing cinematograph pictures intended for public exhibition or in exhibiting
such pictures; or
22 employed in the training keeping or working of elephants or wild animals; or
23 employed in the tapping of palm trees or the felling or logging of trees or the transport of timber
by inland waters or the control or extinguishing or forests fires; or
24 employed in operations for the catching or hunting of elephants or other wild animals; or
25 employed as a diver; or
26 employed in the handling or transport of goods in or within the precincts of -
(a) any warehouse or other place in which goods are stored and in which on any one day of the
preceding twelve months ten or more persons have been so employed or (b) any market in which on
any one day of the preceding twelve months fifty or more persons have been so employed; or
27 employed in any occupation involving the handling and manipulation of radium or X-ray
apparatus or contract with radioactive substances; or
28 employed in or in connection with the construction erection dismantling operation or
maintenance of an aircraft as defined in section 2 of the Indian Aircraft Act 1934 (22 of 1934); or
29 employed in horticultural operations forestry bee keeping or framing by tractors or other
contrivances driven by steam or other mechanical power or by electricity; or
30 employed otherwise than in a clerical capacity in the construction working repair or maintenance
of a tube-well; or
31 employed in the maintenance repair or renewal of electric fittings in any building; or
32 employed in a circus.
33 employed as watchman in any factory or establishment; or
34 employed in any operation in the sea for catching fish;
35 employed in any employment which requires handling of snakes for the purpose of extraction of
venom or for the purpose of looking after snakes or handling any other poisonous animal or insects;
or
36 employed in handling animals like horses mules and bulls;
37 employed for the purpose of loading or unloading any mechanically propelled vehicle or in the
handling or transport of goods which have been loaded in such vehicles;
38 employed in cleaning of sewer lines or septic tanks within the limits of a local authority;
39 employed on surveys and investigation exploration or garage or discharge observation of rivers
including drilling operations hydrological observations and floodforecasting activities groundwater
surveys and exploration;
40 employed in cleaning of jungles or reclaiming land or ponds in which on any one day of the
preceding twelve months more than twenty-five persons have been employed;
41 employed in cultivation of land or rearing and maintenance of live-stock or forest operations or
fishing in which on any one day of the preceding twelve months more than twenty-five persons
have been employed;
42 employed in installation maintenance or repair of pumping equipment used for lifting of water
from wells tube wells ponds lakes streams and the like;
43 employed in the construction boring or deepening of an open well bore well bore-cum-dug well
filter point and the like;
44 employed in spraying and dusting of insecticides or pesticides in agricultural operations or
plantations; or
45 employed in mechanized harvesting and threshing operations;
46 employed in working or repair or maintenance of bulldozers tractors power tillers and the like;
47 employed as artists for drawing pictures on advertisement boards at a height of 3.66 metres or
more from the ground level;
48 employed in any newspaper establishment as defined in the Working Journalists and Other
Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Services) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (45 of
1955) and engaged in outdoor work. Explanation : In this Schedule the preceding twelve months
relates in any particular case to the twelve months ending with the day on which the accident in
such case occurred.
SCHEDULE III [Section 3]
LIST OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
1. Infectious and parasitic diseases contracted in an occupation where there is a particular risk of
contamination
(a)All work involving exposure to health or laboratory work;
(b) All work involving exposure to veterinary work
(c) Work relating to handling animals, animal carcasses or merchandise which may have been
contaminated by animals or animal carcasses;
(d) Other work carrying a particular risk of contamination.
2. Disease caused by work in compressed air All work involving exposure to the risk concerned
3.Diseases caused by lead or its toxic compounds All work involving exposure to the risk concerned
4. Poisoning by nitrous fumes All work involving exposure to the risk concerned
5. Poisoning by organo phosphorus compounds All work involving exposure to the risk concerned
PART B
1. Diseases caused by phosphorus or its toxic compounds All work involving exposure to the risk
concerned
2. Diseases caused by mercury or its toxic compounds All work involving exposure to the risk
concerned
3. Diseases caused by benzene or its toxic homologues All work involving exposure to the risk
concerned
4. Diseases caused by nitro and amino toxic derivatives of benzene or its homologous All work
involving exposure to the risk concerned.
Amendments to Workers Compensation Act,1923
Recent amendments to the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (the 1987 Act) and the Workplace
Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) came into force on 1
February 2011 and have significant implications for all stakeholders. Some of the particularly
significant amendments are outlined below.
Section 60 Expenses
Section 60 has been amended to provide that the Workers Compensation Commission
(WCC) has jurisdiction to deal with claims for proposed treatment or services when it had
previously been determined that the jurisdiction was limited to treatment or service costs
already incurred. A dispute in the WCC regarding proposed treatment or services must be
referred for Approved Medical Specialist assessment.
Accordingly, if an insurer or employer has declined liability for, or failed to determine
liability for, proposed treatment or services, a worker can now bring WCC proceedings and
obtain an award for compensation in respect of such treatment or services. Therefore,
workers will not have to incur the cost of treatment or services in order to have their
entitlement to compensation for such determined by the WCC and thereby be at risk of an
adverse decision leaving them 'out of pocket'. This amendment places even greater
importance on insurers/employers making decisions within the legislative timeframe of 21
days, for claims for proposed treatment or services as failure to do so could result in the
worker bringing WCC proceedings which would likely increase legal costs on the claim.
Permanent Impairment Medical Reports
The cost of medical reports obtained by workers to claim permanent impairment
compensation is a section 60 expense and are payable accordingly. However section 73
of the 1987 Act now provides that the costs of such medical reports are not payable until
the permanent impairment claim has concluded. This applies to medical reports obtained
prior to the commencement of the amendment.
The practical implication of this is that insurers/employers can wait until a worker's lump
sum compensation claim has been determined or settled before considering payment of
the worker's permanent impairment medical report.
Appeals
There have been significant amendments which change the nature of appeals and the
types of decisions that can be appealed.
Section 352 of the 1998 Act (appeals against Arbitrator decisions) has been amended
such that appeals are now limited to determination of whether the Arbitrator's decision was
affected by error of fact, law or discretion and then the correction of any such error.
Appeals against Arbitrator decisions are no longer by way of a review or a new hearing.
Arbitrator decisions that are interlocutory decisions can now be appealed due to a further
amendment to section 352. Accordingly, it is now possible for parties to appeal decisions
by Arbitrators on matters such as admission of evidence, whether a party can raise an
issue in dispute that was not previously notified or allowing or refusing an application to
issue a Direction for Production. Appeals against interlocutory decisions require leave from
the Commission and the Commission can only allow such appeals if it is of the opinion that
doing so is necessary or desirable for the proper and effective determination of the
dispute.
The ability to appeal interlocutory decisions is particularly significant in the context of
applications for an Interim Payment Direction as it is now possible to appeal an Arbitrators
decision to grant or refuse an Interim Payment Direction. Prior to the amendment it was
not possible to appeal such a decision by an Arbitrator and this meant that
insurers/employers could be directed to pay compensation in respect of an injury for which
liability had been properly declined and workers could be refused compensation and in
both situations an appeal was expressly precluded. However, the recent amendments
provide for a formal appeal recourse for parties in these matters.
The amendments relating to appeals against Arbitrator decisions only apply to decisions
made after the commencement of the amendment.
Appeals against AMS decisions continue to be by way of review, however section 328 of
the 1998 Act has been amended limiting the scope of the review to the grounds on which
the appeal is made. It is no longer open to a Medical Appeal Panel to review an AMS
decision in its entirety and is restricted to reviewing the grounds of appeal relied on by the
appellant. This amendment applies to AMS decisions made prior to the commencement of
the amendment.
Applicability
1) All factories excluding seasonal factories employing 10 or more persons and working with
electric power.
2) All factories excluding seasonal factories employing 20 or more persons and working without
electric power.
3) Any establishment which the Government may specifically notify as being covered.
4) Shop employing 20 or more persons.
Note: As soon as the above conditions are fulfilled the employer should furnish the details in
Form-01 to ESI office for registration under the ESI Act, 1948 & Obtaining of the employer’s Code
No.
Eligibility
1)Any person employed for wages (up to Rs. 6,500) in or in connection with the work of a factory
or establishment end.
2) Any person who is directly employed by the employer in a factory or through his agent on work
which is ordinarily part of the work of the factory or incidental to purpose of the factory.
Benefits
1) Free medical treatment is offered to covered employees at hospital and dispensaries run by
the ESI Corporation.
2) About 7/12th of employees normal wage will be payable to him by ESI during sickness.
3) Maternity benefit for 12 weeks of which not more than 6 weeks should be preceding
confinement.
4) Injury during/in course of employment resulting in temporary/permanent disablement entitles
the covered employee to a regular payment to substitute his lost wages.
5) Death during course of employment entitles specified dependents to a regular payment.
6) Onetime payment of Rs. 1,500 to help meet funeral expenses.
Penal Provisions
1)For employees’ contribution : Imprisonment for minimum 2 yrs. to maximum 5 yrs. and/or fine of
Rs. 25,000/- .
2) For employer’s contribution: Imprisonment for minimum 6 months to maximum 3 yrs. and/or
fine of Rs. 10,000/- .
BENEFITS AT A GLANCE
OTHER BENEFITS
Supply of special aids : Insured persons and members of their families are provided artificial limbs,
hearing aids, artificial dentures, spectacles (for insured person only) & artificial appliances like
spinal supports, cervical collars, walking callipers, crutches, wheel chairs and cardiac pace makers,
dialysis/dialysis with kidney transplant etc. as part of medical care under the ESI Scheme.
1. These Rules may be called the Employees' State Insurance (Central) Amendment
Rules, 2010.
2. These shall come into force from the l " day of May, 2010.
3. In the Employees' State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950, in Rule 50, for the words
"ten thousand", wherever they occur, the words "fifteen thousand" shall be substituted.
The Employees' Provident Fund Act, 1952 is an important piece of Labour Welfare
legislation enacted by the Parliament to provide social security benefits to the workers. At present,
the Act and the Schemes framed there under provides for three types of benefits -Contributory
Provident Fund , Pensioner benefits to the employees/ family members and the insurance cover to
the members of the Provident Fund.
The object of the Act in 1952 was the institution of the compulsory contributory Provident Fund to
the employees to which both the employee and the employer would contribute. The Employees'
Provident Fund Scheme was accordingly framed under the Act and it came into effect from
1-11-1952. Initially the title of the Act was, "The Provident Fund Act 1952".
The provisions of the Employees' Provident Fund & MP Act, 1952 extends to whole of India except
the State of Jammu & Kashmir and also the State of Sikkim where it has not been notified so far
after its annexation with the Union of India .The Act initially applied to factories/establishments
falling within six specified industries which had completed three years of existence and employed
50 or more persons. With effect from 31-12-1960, the establishments employing 20 or more persons
were also brought under the purview of the Act .
With effect from 1-8-1988, the Act is applicable to the establishment employing twenty or more
persons on expiry of a period of three years from the date of set up . From 22-9-1997 this infancy of
three years has been dispensed with and all the establishments employing 20 or more persons are
brought under the purview of the Act from the very date of set up subject to fulfilment of other
conditions. The provisions of the Act apply on its own force independently.
The Central Government has residual powers to apply this act to any establishment employing less
than twenty employees. By virtue of these provisions, the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme has
been extended to Cinema theatres employing five or more persons, w.e.f. 1-10-1984. Also there is a
provision for voluntary application of the Act to any establishment upon joint request from the
employer and majority of its employees, to whom it does not apply otherwise. An establishment to
which this Act applies shall continue to be governed by this Act notwithstanding that the number of
persons employed therein at any time falls below twenty.
The Employees' Provident Fund organisation came into being following enactment of
the Employees’ Provident Fund Act in the year 1952. The funds established under the Act vests in
and administered by Central Board of Trustees constituted by Central Government which functions
subject to overall regulatory control of the Central Government.
MEMBERSHIP:
At the inception of the scheme an employee who was in receipt of pay up to Rs.300/- p.m. , and
who worked for one year was eligible for membership of the fund. As a result of amendments made
from time to time, the conditions of eligibility for membership of the fund have been liberalised in
favour of employee. Presently an employee at the time of joining the employment and getting
wages upto Rs.6500/- is required to become a member. Now an employee is eligible for
membership of fund from the very first date of joining a covered establishment.
�Benefits available to the workers include the provident fund, employees deposit linked insurance
and the pension to the workers and their families
� applicable to 180 industries/classes of establishments employing 20 or more workers
� wage ceiling for coverage is Rs. 6,500 per month
� 24.53 million workers are covered under the Act
� these are administered by the Employees Provident Fund Organisation under the overall
supervision and direction of the Central Board of Trustees and Committees
� Central Provident Fund Commissioner (CPFC) is the Chief Executive Officer of the Organisation
1. Grant of exemption from the operation of the scheme/s framed under the Act to an establishment,
to a class of employees and to an individual employee, on certain conditions.
2. Penalties to employers/trustees of exempted Provident Fund who contravenes the provision of the
Act and the Scheme.
3. Appointment of inspector to secure compliance under the Act and the Schemes framed there
under.
4. Mode of recovery of moneys due from employers.
(Act No. 19 of 1952)4th March, 1952 - An Act to provide for the institution of provident funds,
pension fund and deposit-linked insurance fund for employees in factories and other
establishments.
1. Short title, extent and application - (1) This Act may be called the Employees’ Provident
Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
(3) Subject to the provisions contained in section 16, it applies -
(a)to every establishment which is a factory engaged in any industry specified in Schedule I and in
which twenty or more persons are employed and
(b) to any other establishment employing twenty or more persons or class of such establishments
which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify, in this behalf:
Provided that the Central Government may, after giving not less than two months’ notice of its
intention so to do, by notification in the Official Gazette, apply the provisions of this Act to any
establishment employing such number of persons less than twenty as may be specified in the
notification.
3. Power to apply Act to an establishment which has a common provident fund with another
establishment. - Where immediately before this Act becomes applicable to an establishment there
is in existence a provident fund which is common to the employees employed in that establishment
and employees in any other establishment, the Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette direct that the provisions of this Act shall also apply to such other establishment.
4. Power to add to Schedule I. – (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, add to Schedule I any other industry in respect of the employees whereof it is of opinion
that a Provident Fund Scheme should be framed under this Act, and thereupon the industry so
added shall be deemed to be an industry specified in Schedule I for the purpose of this Act.
(2) All notifications under sub-section 1 shall be laid before Parliament, as soon as may be, after
they are issued.
5. Employees’ Provident Funds Scheme. – (1) The Central Government may, by notification in
the Official Gazette, frame a scheme to be called the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme for the
establishment of provident funds under this Act for employees or for any class of employees and
specify the establishments or class of establishments to which the said Scheme shall apply and
there shall be established, as soon as may be after the framing of the Scheme, a Fund in accordance
with the provisions of this Act and the Scheme.
5A.Central Board. - (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
constitute, with effect from such date as may be specified therein, a Board of Trustees for the
territories to which this Act extends hereinafter in this Act referred to as the Central Board
consisting of the following persons as members, namely:- (a)a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman to
be appointed by the Central Government;
(b)not more than five persons appointed by the Central Government from amongst its officials;
(c)not more than fifteen persons representing Governments of such States as the Central
Government may specify in this behalf, appointed by the Central Government;
(d)ten persons representing employers of the establishments to which the Scheme applies,
appointed by the Central Government after consultation with such organisations of employers as
may be recognised by the Central Government in this behalf; and
(e) ten persons representing employees in the establishments to which the Scheme applies,
appointed by the Central Government after consultation with such organisations of employees as
may be recognised by the Central Government in this behalf.
(2)The terms and conditions subject to which a member of the Central Board may be appointed
and the time, place and procedure of the meetings of the Central Board shall be such as may be
provided for in the Scheme.
(3)The Central Board shall subject to the provisions of section 6 and section 6C administer the
Fund vested in it in such manner as may be specified in the Scheme.
(4)The Central Board shall perform such other functions as it may be required to perform by or
under any provisions of the Scheme, the Pension Scheme and the Insurance scheme.
(5)The Central Board shall maintain proper accounts of its income and expenditure in such form
and in such manner as the Central Government may, after consultation with the Comptroller and
Auditor-General of India, specify in the Scheme.
(6)The accounts of the Central Board shall be audited annually by the comptroller and
Auditor-General of India and any expenditure incurred by him in connection with such audit shall
be payable by the Central Board to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India.
(7)The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India and any person appointed by him in connection
with the audit of the accounts of the Central Board shall have the same rights and privileges and
authority in connection with such audit as the Comptroller and Auditor-General has, in connection
with the audit of Government accounts and, in particular, shall have the right to demand the
production of books, accounts, connected vouchers, documents and papers and inspect any of the
offices of the Central Board.
(8)The accounts of the Central Board as certified by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India
or any other person appointed by him in this behalf together with the audit report thereon shall be
forwarded to the Central Board which shall forward the same to the Central Government along
with its comments on the report of the Comptroller and Auditor-General.
(9)It shall be the duty of the Central Board to submit also to the Central Government an annual
report of its work and activities and the Central Government shall cause a copy of the annual
report, the audited accounts together with the report of the Comptroller and Auditor-General of
India and the comments of the Central Board thereon to be laid before each House of Parliament.
5AA. Executive Committee. – (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, constitute, with effect from such date as may be specified therein, an Executive
Committee to assist the Central Board in the performance of its functions.
(2) The Executive Committee shall consist of the following persons as members, namely:-
(a)a Chairman appointed by the Central Government from amongst the members of the Central
Board:
(b)two persons appointed by the Central Government from amongst the persons referred to in
clause b of sub-section 1 of section 5A;
(c)three persons appointed by the Central Government from amongst the persons referred to in
clause c of sub-section 1 of section 5A;
(d)three persons representing the employers elected by the Central Board from amongst the
persons referred to in clause d of sub-section 1 of section 5A;
(e)three persons representing the employees elected by the Central Board from amongst the
persons referred to in clause e of sub-section 1 of section 5A;
(f)the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, ex-officio.
(3)The terms and conditions subject to which a member of the Central Board may be appointed or
elected to the Executive Committee and the time, place and procedure of the meetings of the
Executive Committee shall be such as may be provided for in the Scheme.
5B. State Board.- (1)The Central Government may, after consultation with the Government of any
State, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute for that State a Board of Trustees
hereinafter in this Act referred to as the State Board in such manner as may be provided for in the
Scheme.
(2) A State Board shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as the
Central Government may assign to it from time to time.
(3)The terms and conditions subject to which a member of a State Board
may be appointed and the time, place and procedure of the meetings of a State Board shall be such
as may be provided for in the Scheme.
5C. Board of Trustees to be body corporate.- Every Board of Trustees constituted under section
5A or section 5B shall be a body corporate under the name specified in the notification constituting
it, having perpetual succession and a common seal and shall by the said name sue and be sued.
5D.Appointment of officers. – (1) The Central Government shall appoint may appoint the
required officers as per the Act.
5DD.Acts and proceedings of the Central Board or its Executive Committee or the State
Board not to be invalidated on certain grounds. – No act done or proceeding taken by the
Central Board or the Executive Committee constituted under section 5AA or the State Board shall
be questioned on the ground merely of the existence of any vacancy in, or any defect in the
constitution of, the Central Board or the Executive Committee or the State Board, as the case may
be.
5E. Delegation. - The Central Board may delegate to the Executive Committee or to the Chairman
of the Board or to any of its officers and a State Board may delegate to its Chairman or to any of its
officers, subject to such conditions and limitations, if any, as it may specify, such of its powers and
functions under this Act as it may deem necessary for the efficient administration of the Scheme,
the Pension Scheme and the Insurance Scheme.
6. Contributions and matters which may be provided for in Schemes. – The contribution which
shall be paid by the employer to the Fund shall be ten percent. Of the basic wages, dearness
allowance and retaining allowance, if any, for the time being payable to each of the employees
whether employed by him directly or by or through a contractor, and the employee’s contribution
shall be equal to the contribution payable by the employer in respect of him and may, if any
employee so desires, be an amount exceeding ten percent of his basic wages, dearness allowance
and retaining allowance if any, subject to the condition that the employer shall not be under an
obligation to pay any contribution over and above his contribution payable under this section:
6A.Employees’ Pension Scheme. – (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette, frame a scheme to be called the Employees’ Pension Scheme for the purpose of
providing for –
(b) Widow or widower’s pension, children pension or orphan pension payable to the beneficiaries
of such employees.
6D. Laying of Schemes before Parliament. - Every scheme framed under section 5, section 6A
and section 6C shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is framed, before each House of Parliament,
while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in
two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the
session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the
scheme, or both Houses agree that the scheme should not be framed, the scheme shall thereafter
have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so however, that any
such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously
done under that scheme.
7. Modification of Scheme – (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette add to, amend or vary either prospectively or retrospectively, the Scheme, the Pension
Scheme or the Insurance Scheme, as the case may be.
7A. Determination of moneys due from employers. – (1)The Central Provident Fund
Commissioner, any Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, any Deputy Provident Fund
Commissioner, any Regional Provident Fund Commissioner or any Assistant Provident Fund
Commissioner may, by order,
(a)in a case where a dispute arises regarding the applicability of this Act to an establishment,
decide such dispute; and
(b) determine the amount due from any employer under any provision of this Act, the Scheme or
the Pension Scheme or the Insurance Scheme, as the case may be,
and for any of the aforesaid purposes may conduct such inquiry as he may deem necessary.
(2) The officer conducting the inquiry under sub-section 1 shall, for the purposes of such inquiry
have the same powers as are vested in a court under the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908),
for trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:-
(a)enforcing the attendance of any person or examining him on oath:
(b) requiring the discovery and production of documents;
(c) receiving evidence on affidavit;
(d) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses.
7B. Review of orders passed under Section 7A. - (1) Any person aggrieved by an order made
under sub-section 1 of section 7A, but from which no appeal has been preferred under this Act, and
who, from the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due
diligence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the
order was made, or on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record or for
any other sufficient reason, desires to obtain a review of such order may apply for a review of that
order to the officer who passed the order:
7C.Determination of escaped amount. - Where an order determining the amount due from an
employer under section 7A or section 7B has been passed and if the officer who passed the orders
–
(a) has reason to believe that by reason of the omission or failure on the part of the employer to
make any document or report available, or to disclose, fully and truly, all material facts necessary
for determining the correct amount due from the employer, any amount so due from such employer
for any period has escaped his notice;
he may, within a period of five years from the date of communication of the order passed under
section 7A or section 7B, re-open the case and pass appropriate orders re-determining the amount
due from the employer in accordance with the provisions of this Act:
7D Employees’ Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal. –(1) The Central Government may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one or more Appellate Tribunals to be known as the
Employees’ Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal to exercise the powers and discharge the
functions conferred on such Tribunal by this Act and every such Tribunal shall have jurisdiction in
respect of establishments situated in such area as may be specified in the notification constituting
the Tribunal.
(2) A Tribunal shall consist of one person only to be appointed by the Central Government.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Presiding Officer of a Tribunal hereinafter
referred to as the Presiding Officer, unless he is, or has been, or is qualified to be, -
(i)a Judge of a High Court; or
(ii) a District Judge.
7E. Term of office. - The Presiding Officer of a Tribunal shall hold office for a term of five years
from the date on which he enters upon his office or until he attains the age of sixty-two years,
whichever is earlier.
7F.Resignation. –(1)The Presiding Officer may, by notice in writing under his hand addressed to
the Central Government, resign his office;
7G. Salary and allowances and other terms and conditions of service of Presiding Officer. -
The salary and allowances payable to, and the other terms and conditions of service including
pension, gratuity and other retirement benefits of, the Presiding Officer shall be such as may be
prescribed:
Provided that neither the salary and allowances nor the other terms and conditions of service of the
Presiding Officer shall be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
7H. Staff of the Tribunal. - (1)The Central Government shall determine the nature and categories
of the officers and other employees required to assist a Tribunal in the discharge of its functions
and provide the Tribunal with such officers and other employees as it may think fit.
(2) The officers and other employees of a Tribunal shall discharge their functions under the general
superintendence of the Presiding Officer.
(3) The salaries and all allowances and other conditions of service of the officers and other
employees of a Tribunal shall be such as may be prescribed.
7 – I. Appeals to the Tribunal. –(1) Any person aggrieved by a notification issued by the Central
Government, or an order passed by the Central Government, or any authority, under the proviso to
sub-section 3, or sub-section4, of section I, or section3, or sub-section 1 of section 7A, or section
7B except an order rejecting an application for review referred to in sub-section 5 thereof, or
section 7C, or section 14B may prefer an appeal to a Tribunal against such order.
(2) Every appeal under sub-section 1 shall be filed in such form and manner, within such time and
be accompanied by such fees, as may be prescribed.
7 – J. Procedure of Tribunals. – (1)A Tribunal shall have power to regulate its own procedure in
all matters arising out of the exercise of its powers or of the discharge of its functions including the
places at which the Tribunal shall have its sittings.
(2) A Tribunal shall, for the purpose of discharging its functions, have all the powers which are
vested in the officers referred to in section 7A and any proceeding before the Tribunal shall be
deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228, and for the
purpose of section 196, of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) and the Tribunal shall be deemed to
be a civil court for all the purposes of section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).
(2)The Central Government or a State Government or any other authority under this Act may
authorise one or more legal practitioners or any of its officers to act as presenting officers and
every person so authorised may present the case with respect to any appeal before a Tribunal.
7L.Orders of Tribunal. – (1) A Tribunal may, after giving the parties to the appeal, an
opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or
annulling the order appealed against or may refer the case back to the authority which passed such
order with such directions as the tribunal may think fit, for a fresh adjudication or order, as the case
may be, after taking additional evidence, if necessary.
7–O. Deposit of amount due, on filing appeal. – No appeal by the employer shall be entertained
by a Tribunal unless he has deposited with it seventy-five per cent of the amount due from him as
determined by an officer referred to in section 7A:
Provided that the Tribunal may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, waive or reduce the amount
to be deposited under this section.
7P. Transfer of certain applications to Tribunals. – All applications which are pending before
the Central Government under section 19A, shall stand transferred to a Tribunal exercising
jurisdiction in respect of establishments in relation to which such applications had been made as if
such applications were appeals preferred to the Tribunal.
7Q. The employer shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum or
at such higher rate as may be specified in the Scheme on any amount due from him under this Act
from the date on which the amount has become so due till the date of its actual payment:
Provided that higher rate of interest specified in the Scheme shall not exceed the lending rate of
interest charged by any scheduled bank.
(a) from the employer in relation to an establishment to which any Scheme or the Insurance
Scheme applies in respect of any contribution payable to the Fund or, as the case may be, the
Insurance Fund, damages recoverable under section 14B, accumulations required to be transferred
under sub-section 2 of section 15 or under sub-section 5 of section 17 or any charges payable by
him under any other provision of this Act or of any provision of the Scheme or the Insurance
Scheme; or
(b) from the employer in relation to an exempted establishment in respect of any damages
recoverable under section 14B or any charges payable by him the appropriate Government under
any provision of this Act or under any of the conditions specified under section 17 or in respect of
the contribution payable by him towards the Pension Scheme under the said section 17, may, if the
amount is in arrear, be recovered in the manner specified in section 8B to 8G.
(1) The amount of contribution that is to say, the employer’s contribution as well as the employee’s
contribution in pursuance of any Scheme and the employer’s contribution in pursuance of the
Insurance Scheme and any charges for meeting the cost of administering the Fund paid or payable
by an employer in respect of an employee employed by or through a contractor may be recovered
by such employer from the contractor, either by deduction from any amount payable to the
contractor under any contract or as a debt payable by the contractor.
(1) Where any amount is in arrear under section8, the authorised officer may issue, to the Recovery
Officer, a certificate under his signature specifying the amount of arrears and the Recovery Officer,
on receipt of such certificate, shall proceed to recover the amount specified therein from the
establishment or, as the case may be, the employer by one or more of the modes mentioned below:-
(a) attachment and sale of the movable or immovable property of the establishment or, as the case
may be, the employer;
(c) appointing a receiver for the management of the movable or immovable properties of the
establishment or, as the case may be, the employer:
Provided that the attachment and sale of any property under this section shall first be effected
against the properties of the establishment and where such attachment and sale is insufficient for
recovery the whole of the amount of arrears specified in the certificate, the Recovery Officer may
take such proceedings against the property of the employer for recovery of the whole or any part of
such arrears.
(2) The authorised officer may issue a certificate under sub-section 1, notwithstanding that
proceedings for recovery of the arrears by any other mode have been taken.
(1)The authorised officer may forward the certificate referred to in section 8B to the Recovery
Officer within whose jurisdiction the employer –
(a) carries on his business or profession or within whose jurisdiction the principal place of his
establishment is situated; or
(b) resides or any movable or immovable property of the establishment or the employer is situated.
(2)Where an establishment or the employer has property within the jurisdiction of more than one
Recovery Officers and the Recovery Officer to whom a certificate is sent by the authorised officer
-
(1) When the authorised officer issues a certificate to a Recovery Officer under section 8B, it shall
not be open to the employer to dispute before the Recovery Officer the correctness of the amount,
and no objection to the certificate on any other ground shall also be entertained by the Recovery
Officer.
(1) Notwithstanding that a certificate has been issued to the Recovery Officer for the recovery of
any amount, the authorised officer may grant time for the payment of the amount, and thereupon
the Recovery Officer shall stay the proceedings until the expiry of the time so granted.
(1) Notwithstanding the issue of a certificate to the Recovery Officer under section 8B, the Central
Provident Fund Commissioner or any other officer authorised by the Central Board may recover
the amount by any one or more of the modes provided in this section.
The provisions of the Second and Third Schedules to the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and
the Income-tax Certificate Proceedings rules, 1962, as in force from time to time, shall apply with
necessary modifications as if the said provisions and the rules referred to the arrears of the amount
mentioned in section 8 of this Act instead of to the income-tax:
Provided that any reference in the said provisions and the rules to the “assessee” shall be construed
as a reference to an employer as defined in this Act.
For the purpose of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922), the Fund shall be deemed to be a
recognised provident fund within the meaning of Chapter IXA of that Act:
Provided that nothing contained in the said Chapter shall operate to render ineffective any
provision of the Scheme under which the Fund is established, which is repugnant to any of the
provisions of that Chapter or of the rules made there under.
(1) amount standing to the credit of any member in Fund or of any exempted employee in a
provident fund shall not in any way be capable of being assigned or charged and shall not be liable
to attachment under any decree or order of any court in respect of any debt or liability incurred by
the member or the exempted employee, and neither the official assignee appointed under the
Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 (3 of 1909) nor any receiver appointed under the
Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (5 of 1920), shall be entitled to have any claim on, any such
amount.
(2) Any amount standing to the credit of a member in the fund or of an exempted employee in a
provident fund at the time of his death and payable to his nominee under the Scheme or the rules of
the provident fund shall, subject to any deduction authorised by the said Scheme or rules, vest in
the nominee and shall be free from any debt or other liability incurred by the deceased or the
nominee before the death of the member or of exempted employee and shall also not be liable to
attachment under any decree or order of any court.
(3) The provisions of sub-section 1 and sub-section 2 shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to
the pension or any other amount, payable under the Pension Scheme and also in relation to any
amount payable under the Insurance Scheme as they apply in relation to any amount payable out of
the Fund.
(1) Where any employer is adjudicated insolvent or, being a company, an order for winding up is
made, the amount due -
(a) from the employer in relation to an establishment to which any Scheme or the Insurance
Scheme applies in respect of any contribution payable to the Fund or, as the case may be, the
Insurance Fund damages recoverable under section 14B, accumulations required to be transferred
under sub-section 2 of section 15 or any charges payable by him under any other provision of this
Act or of any provision of the Scheme or the Insurance Scheme; or
(b) from the employer in relation to an exempted establishment in respect of any contribution to
the provident fund or any insurance fund in so far as it relates to exempted employees, under the
rules of the provident fund or any insurance fund, any contribution payable by him towards the
Pension Fund under sub-section 6 of section 17, damages recoverable under section 14B or any
charges payable by him to the appropriate Government under any provision of this Act, or under
any of the conditions specified under section 17,
No employer in relation to an establishment to which any Scheme or the Insurance Scheme applies
shall, by reason only of his liability for the payment of any contribution to the Fund or the
Insurance Fund or any charges under this Act or the Scheme or the Insurance Scheme reduce
whether directly or indirectly, the wages of any employee to whom the Scheme or the Insurance
Scheme applies or the total quantum of benefits in the nature of old age pension, gratuity,
provident fund or life insurance to which the employee is entitled under the terms of his
employment, express or implied.
13. Inspectors.
(1) The appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint such persons
as it thinks fit to be Inspectors for the purposes of this Act, the Scheme, the Pension Scheme or the
Insurance Scheme and may define their jurisdiction.
14. Penalties.
(1) Whoever, for the purpose of avoiding any payment to be made by himself under this Act, the
Scheme, the Pension Scheme or the Insurance Scheme or of enabling any other person to avoid
such payment, knowingly makes or causes to be made any false statement or false representation
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine of
five thousand rupees, or with both.
(1)If the person committing an offence under this Act, the Scheme or the Pension Scheme or the
Insurance Scheme is a company, every person who at the time the offence was committed was in
charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as
well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be
proceeded against and punished accordingly:
14AA.Enhanced punishment in certain cases after previous conviction - Whoever, having been
convicted by a court of an offence punishable under this Act, the Scheme or the Pension Scheme or
the Insurance Scheme, commits the same offence shall be subject for every such subsequent
offence to imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years, but which shall not be less
than two years, and shall also be liable to a fine of twenty five thousand rupees.
14AC.Cognizance and trial of offences – (1) No Court shall take cognizance of any offence
punishable under this Act, the Scheme or the Pension Scheme or the Insurance Scheme except on a
report in writing of the facts constituting such offence made with the previous sanction of the
Central Provident Fund Commissioner or such other officer as may be authorised by the Central
Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, in this behalf, by an Inspector appointed under
Section 13.
14B. Power to recover damages - Where an employer makes default in the payment of any
contribution to the Fund the Pension Fund or the Insurance Fund or in the transfer of
accumulations required to be transferred by him under sub-section 2 of section 15 or sub-section 5
of section 17 or in the payment of any charges payable under any other provision of this Act or of
any Scheme or Insurance Scheme or under any of the conditions specified under section 17, the
Central Provident Fund Commissioner or such other officer as may be authorised by the Central
Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, in this behalf may recover from the employer
by way of penalty such damages, not exceeding the amount of arrears, as may be specified in the
Scheme.
14C. Power of court to make orders - Where an employer is convicted of an offence of making
default in the payment of any contribution to the Fund, the Pension Fund or the Insurance Fund or
in the transfer of accumulations required to be transferred by him under sub-section (2) of section
15 or sub-section (5) of section 17, the court may, in addition to awarding any punishment, by
order in writing require him within a period specified in the order which the court may, if it thinks
fit and on application in that behalf from time to time, extend, to pay the amount of contribution or
transfer the accumulations, as the case may be, in respect of which the offence was committed.
15.Special provisions relating to existing provident funds - Subject to the provisions of section
17, every employee who is a subscriber to any provident fund or an establishment to which this
Act applies shall, pending the application of a Scheme to the establishment in which he is
employed, continue to be entitled to the benefits accruing to him under the provident fund, and the
provident fund shall continue to be maintained in the same manner and subject to the same
conditions as it would have been if this Act had not been passed.
16.Act not to apply to certain establishments - This Act shall not apply –
(a) to any establishment registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 (2 of 1912), or
under any other law for the time being in force in any State relating to co-operative societies
employing less than fifty persons and working without the aid of power; or
(b)to any other establishment belonging to or under the control of the Central Government or a
State Government and whose employees are entitled to the benefit of contributory provident fund
or old age pension in accordance with any Scheme or rule framed by the Central Government or
the State Government governing such benefits; or
(c) to any other establishment set up under any Central, Provincial or State Act and whose
employees are entitled to the benefits of contributory provident fund or old age pension in
accordance with any scheme or rule framed under that Act governing such benefits;
(2)If the Central Government is of opinion that having regard to the financial position of any class
of establishments or other circumstances of the case, it is necessary or expedient to do so, it may,
by notification in the Official Gazette, and subject to such conditions, as may be specified in the
notification, exempt whether prospectively or retrospectively that class of establishments from the
operation of this Act for such period as may be specified in the notification.
17.Power to exempt -The appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
and subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification exempt, whether
prospectively or retrospectively, from the operation of all or any of the provisions of any Scheme -
17A. Transfer of accounts – Where an employee employed in an establishment to which this Act
applies leaves his employment and obtains re-employment in another establishment to which this
Act does not apply, the amount of accumulations to the credit of such employee in the fund, or as
the case may be, in the provident fund of the establishment left by him shall be transferred, within
such time as may be specified by the Central Government in this behalf, to the credit of his account
in the provident fund of the establishment in which he is re-employed, if the employee so desires
and the rules in relation to that provident fund permit such transfer.
18. Protection of Action taken in good faith - No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall
lie against the Central Government, a State Government, the Presiding Officer of a tribunal, any
authority referred to in section 7A, an Inspector or any other person for anything which is in good
faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act, the Scheme, the Pension Scheme or the
Insurance Scheme.
18A.Presiding Officer and other officers to be public servants - The Presiding Officer of a
Tribunal, its officers and other employees, the authorities referred to in section 7A and every
Inspector shall be deemed to be public servants within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian
Penal Code (45 of 1860).
19.Delegation of powers - The appropriate Government may direct that any power or authority or
jurisdiction exercisable by it under this Act, the Scheme, the Pension Scheme or the Insurance
Scheme shall, in relation to such matters and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified
in the direction.
20.Power of Central Government to give directions - The Central Government may, from time
to time, give such directions to the Central Board as it may think fit for the efficient administration
of this Act and when any such direction is given, the Central Board shall comply with such
direction.
21.Power to make rules – The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.
22.Power to remove difficulties – If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this
Act, as amended by the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment)
Act, 1988, the Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such
provisions, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, as appear to it to be necessary or
expedient for the removal of the difficulty.
G.S.R. 25(E)- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5, read with sub-section(1)
of Section 7 of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
(19 of 1952), the Central Government hereby makes the following Scheme, further to
amend the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, namely:-
1. (1) This Scheme may be called the Employees' Provident Funds (Amendment)
Scheme, 2011.
(2) It shall come into force from the 1st day of April 2011.
2. In the Employees Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, (hereinafter referred to as the said
Scheme), in paragraph 60, after sub-paragraph (5), the following sub- paragraph shall be
substituted, namely:-
"(6) Interest shall not be credited to the account of a member from the date on which it
has become Inoperative Account, under the provisions of sub-paragraph(6) of paragraph
72".
(a) for the words "but no claim has been preferred " the word" but no application for
withdrawal under paragraphs 69 or 70 or transfer, as the case may be has been
preferred" shall be substituted.
(b) for the words "three years", at both the places where they occur, the words "thirty six
months shall be substituted.
The Maternity Benefits Act,1961
The main objective of enacting the Maternity benefit Act, 1961 is to safeguard the
interests of the pregnant women employees working in the organizations of India. Taking into
consideration the hardships that are taken up by the women employees during the period of
pregnancy which deteriorate their health physically and psychologically, the government of India
has made special provisions through the enactment of the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961. The present
Act prescribes a number of guidelines and instructions to the employers who engage the women
employees in the industry. The Act provides for prohibiting the women employees from doing work
during the period of pregnancy and also for paying the pregnant employee a reasonable
compensation for fulfilling all her necessary medical requirements.
The Act also made provisions for not engaging the pregnant women in any such work
which is of an arduous nature or which involves long standing hours and which would affect the
growth and development of the foetus of the pregnant women employee. The important provisions
of the Act are as follows.
Important provisions of the Act:
1. Short title, extent and commencement.- (1) This Act may be called the Maternity Benefit Act,
1961.(2) It extends to the whole of India 2***.
(3) It shall come into force on such date3* as may be notified in this behalf in the Official Gazette,–
4*[(a) in relation to mines and to any other establishment wherein persons are employed for the
exhibition of equestrian, acrobatic and other performances, by the Central Government; and]
(b) in relation to other establishments in a State, by the
State Government.
2. Application of Act.- 5*[(1) It applies, in the first instance,--
(a) to every establishment being a factory, mine or plantation including any such establishment
belonging to Government and to every establishment wherein persons are employed for the
exhibition of equestrian, acrobatic and other performances;
(b) to every shop or establishment within the meaning of any law for the time being in force in
relation to shops and establishments in a State, in which ten or more persons are employed, or were
employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months:]
27. Effect of laws and agreements inconsistent with this Act.- (1)The provisions of this Act shall
have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law or in the
terms of any award, agreement or contract of service, whether made before or after the coming into
force of this Act:
Provided that where under any such award, agreement, contract of service or otherwise, a woman is
entitled to benefits in respect of any matter which are more favourable to her than those to which
she would be entitled under this Act, the woman shall continue to be entitled to the more favourable
benefits in respect of that matter, notwithstanding that she is entitled to receive benefits in respect of
other matters under this Act.
(2) Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed to preclude a woman from entering into an
agreement with her employer for granting her rights or privileges in respect of any matter which are
more favourable to her than those to which she would be entitled under this
Act.
28. Power to make rules.- (1) The appropriate Government may, subject to the condition of
previous publication and by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the
purposes of this Act.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may
provide for–
(a) the preparation and maintenance of registers, records and muster-rolls;
(b) the exercise of powers (including the inspection of establishments) and the performance of
duties by Inspectors for the purposes of this Act;
(c) the method of payment of maternity benefit and other benefits under this Act in so far as
provision has not been made therefor in this Act;
(d) the form of notices under section 6;
(e) the nature of proof required under the provisions of this Act;
(f) the duration of nursing breaks referred to in section11;
(g) acts which may constitute gross misconduct for purposes of section 12;
(h) the authority to which an appeal under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 12 shall lie; the
form and manner
(i) the authority to which an appeal shall lie against the decision of the Inspector under section 17;
the form and manner in which such appeal may be made and the procedure to be followed in
disposal thereof;
(j) the form and manner in which complaints may be made to
Inspectors under sub-section (1) of section 17 and the procedure to be followed by them when
making inquiries or causing inquiries to be made under sub-section (2)
of that section;
(k) any other matter which is to be, or may be, prescribed.
(3) Every rule made by the Central Government under this section shall be laid as soon as may be
after it is made, before each House of
Parliament while it is in session for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one
session 1*[or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session
immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid,] both
Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not
be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the
case may be; so however that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the
validity of anything previously done under that rule.
29. Amendment of Act 69 of 1951.-In section 32 of the Plantations
Labour Act, 1951,–
(a) in sub-section (1), the letter and brackets “(a)” before the words “in the case of sickness”, the
word “and”
after the words “sickness allowance” and clause (b)
shall be omitted;
(b) in sub-section (2), the words “or maternity” shall be omitted.
30. Repeal.- On the application of this Act–
(i) to mines, the Mines Maternity Benefit Act, 1941 (19 of
1941) and
(ii) to factories situate in the Union territory of Delhi, the Bombay Maternity Benefit Act, 1929
(Bom. Act VII
of 1929) as in force in that territory, shall stand repealed.
An Act to provide for a scheme for the payment of gratuity to employees engaged in factories,
mines, oilfields, plantations, ports, railway companies, shops or other establishments and for matters
connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twenty-third Year of
Republic of India as follows :
NO. 15 OF 2008
1. Short title and commencement. - (1) This Act may be called the Maternity Benefit
(Amendment) Act, 2008. (2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central
Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
2. Substitution of new section for section 8. - In the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, for
section 8, the following section shall be substituted, namely:- "8. Payment of medical
bonus. (1) Every woman entitled to maternity benefit under this Act shall also be entitled
to receive from her employer a medical bonus of one thousand rupees, if no pre-natal
confinement and post-natal care is provided for by the employer free of charge. (2) The
Central Government may before every three years, by notification in the Official Gazette,
increase the amount of medical bonus subject to the maximum of twenty thousand
rupees.".
The Payment of Gratuity Act,1972
The payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is a small Act having 15 sections without
schedules. Out of all the sections, section-4 is the most important section which explains about the
payment of gratuity. The Central government enacted the Payment of Gratuity (Central)Rules,1972.
In the similar lines, the State government also enacted the Rules applicable in their states
respectively. For example, the Government of Andhra Pradesh enacted the Andhra Pradesh
Payment of Gratuity Rules,1972.
Article 43 of the Constitution of India provides that the State shall endeavour to secure, by
suitable legislation or economic organization or in any other way, to all workers,
agricultural, industrial or otherwise, work, a living wage, conditions of work ensuring a
decent standard of life and full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities. In
fact, in India the wages paid to workers are not living wages. Either they are minimum
wages or they are fair wages.
Further the value of the rupee is decreasing day-by-day. It is called 'inflation'. The workers spend
entire life in working from adolescence to old age in the factories. At the time of retirement, he may
get pension or provident fund. But this amount is not sufficient, when compared with the prices in
the market at the age of his retirement. Particularly at this age, the worker has to perform marriages
of his sons and daughters. At least, he has to construct a small house to spend his remaining life.
Therefore, it is necessary to provide certain facilities to the workers at their retirement age.
Therefore, Parliament enacted “the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972” with an intention to help the
workers at their old age, retrenchment, disablement, etc.
(1) This Act may be called the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Provided that in so far as it relates to plantations or ports, it shall not extend to the State of Jammu
and Kashmir.
(a) every factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port and railway company;
(b) every shop or establishment within the meaning of any law for the time being in force in relation
to shops and establishments in a State, in which ten or more persons are employed, or were
employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months;
20. such other establishments or class of establishments, in which ten or more employees are
employed, or were employed, or, any day of the preceding twelve months, as the Central
Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf.
21. (3A) A shop or establishment to which this Act has become applicable shall continue to be
governed by this Act notwithstanding that the number of persons employed therein at any
time after it has become so applicable falls below ten.]
(4) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification, appoint.
Section: 2 - Definitions.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, -
(a) belonging to, or under the control of, the Central Government,
(c) of a factory belonging to, or under the control of, the Central Government,
(d) of a major port, mine, oilfield or railway company, the Central Government,
(b) "completed year of service" means continuous service for one year;
[2] [(c) "continuous service" means continuous service as defined in section 2A;]
(d) "controlling authority" means an authority appointed by the appropriate Government under
section 3 ;
(e) "employee" means any person (other than an apprentice) employed on wages, [3] [***] in any
establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop, to do any skilled,
semi-skilled, or unskilled, manual, supervisory, technical or clerical work, whether the terms of
such employment are express or implied, [4] [and whether or not such person is employed in a
managerial or administrative capacity, but does not include any such person who holds a post under
the Central Government or a State Government and is governed by any other Act or by any rules
providing for payment of gratuity].
Section: 2A
Continuous service.
(1) an employee shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he has, for that period, been
in uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness,
accident, leave, absence from duty without leave (not being absence in respect of which an order
[***] treating the absence as break in service has been passed in accordance with the standing
order, rules or regulations governing the employees of the establishment), lay off, strike or a
lock-out or cessation of work not due to any fault of the employee, whether such uninterrupted or
interrupted service was rendered before or after the commencement of this Act.
(2) where an employee (not being an employee employed in a seasonal establishment) is not in
continuous service within the meaning of clause (1), for any period of one year or six months, he
shall be deemed to be in continuous service under the employer -
(a) for the said period of one year, if the employee during the period of twelve calendar months
preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the
employer for not less than -
(i) one hundred and ninety days, in the case of an employee employed below the ground in a mine
or in an establishment which works for less than six days in a week; and
(b) for the said period of six months, if the employee during the period of six calendar months
preceding the date with reference to which the calculation is to be made, has actually worked under
the employer for not less than -
(i) ninety-five days, in the case of an employee employed below the ground in a mine or in an
establishment which works for less than six days in a week; and
The appropriate Government may, by notification, appoint any officer to be a controlling authority,
who shall be responsible for the administration of this Act and different controlling authorities may
be appointed for different areas.
Section: 4
Payment of gratuity.
(1) Gratuity shall be payable to an employee on the termination of his employment after he has
rendered continuous service for not less than five years, -
Provided that the completion of continuous service of five years shall not be necessary where the
termination of the employment of any employee is due to death or disablement:
Provided further that in the case of death of the employee, gratuity payable to him shall be paid to
his nominee or, if no nomination has been made, to his heirs, and where any such nominees or heirs
is a minor, the share of such minor, shall be deposited with the controlling authority who shall
invest the same for the benefit of such minor in such bank or other financial institution, as may be
prescribed, until such minor attains majority.]
Explanation. : For the purposes of this section, disablement means such disablement as
incapacitates an employee for the work which he, was capable of performing before the accident or
disease resulting in such disablement.
(2) For every completed year of service or part thereof in excess of six months, the employer shall
pay gratuity to an employee at the rate of fifteen days wages based on the rate of wages last drawn
by the employee concerned:
Provided that in the case of a piece-rate
Section: 4A
Compulsory insurance
(1) With effect from such date as may be notified by the appropriate Government in this behalf,
every employer, other than an employer or an establishment belonging to, or under the control of,
the Central Government or a State Government, shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2),
obtain an insurance in the manner prescribed, for his liability for payment towards the gratuity
under this Act, from the Life Insurance Corporation of India established under the Life Insurance
Corporation of India Act, 1956 (31 of 1956) or any other prescribed insurer:
Provided that different dates may be appointed for different establishments or class of
establishments or for different areas.
(2) The appropriate Government may, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, exempt
every employer who had already established an approved gratuity fund in respect of his employees
and who desires to continue such arrangement and every employer employing five hundred or more
persons who establishes an approved gratuity fund in the manner prescribed from the provisions of
sub-section (1).
(3) For the purpose of effectively implementing the provisions of this section, every employer shall
within such time as may be prescribed get his establishment registered with the controlling authority
in the prescribed manner and no employer shall be registered under the provisions of this section
unless he has taken an insurance referred to in sub-section (1) or has established an approved
gratuity fund referred to in sub-section (2).
(4) The appropriate Government may, by notification, make rules to give effect to the provisions of
this section and such rules may provide for the composition of the Board of Trustees of the
approved gratuity fund and for the recovery by the controlling authority of the amount of the
gratuity payable to an employee from the Life Insurance Corporation of India or any other insurer
with whom an insurance has been taken under sub-section (1), or as the case may be, the Board of
Trustees of the approved gratuity fund.
(5) Where an employer fails to make any payment by way of premium to the insurance referred to
in sub-section (1) or by way of 'contribution to all approved gratuity fund referred to in sub-section
(2), he shall be liable to pay the amount of gratuity due under this Act (including interest, if any, for
delayed payments) forthwith to the controlling authority.
(6) Whoever contravenes the provisions of sub-section (5)Section: 6
Nomination.
(1) Each employee, who has completed one year of service, shall make, within such time, in such
form and in such manner, as may be prescribed, nomination for the Purpose of' the second proviso
to sub-section (1) of section 4.
(2) An employee may, in his nomination, distribute the amount of gratuity payable to him under this
Act amongst more than one nominee.
(3) If an employee has a family at the time of' making a nomination, the nomination shall be made
in favour of one or more members of his family, and any nomination made by such employee in
favour of a person who is not a member of his family, shall be void.
(4) If at the time of making a nomination the employee has no family, the nomination may be made
in favour of any person or persons but if the employee subsequently acquires a family, such
nomination shall forthwith become invalid and the employee shall make, within such time as may
be prescribed, afresh nomination in favour of one or more members of his family.
(5) A nomination may, subject to the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4), be modified by an
employee at any time, after giving to his employer a written notice in such form and in such manner
as may be prescribed, of his intention to do so.
(6) If a nominee predeceases the employee, the interest of the nominee shall revert to the employee
who shall make a fresh nomination, in the prescribed form, in respect of such interest.
(7) Every nomination, fresh nomination or alteration of nomination, as the case may be, shall be
sent by the employee to his employer, who shall keep the same in his safe custody.
Section: 7
Determination of the amount of gratuity.
(1) A person who is eligible for payment of gratuity under this Act or any person authorised, in
writing, to act on his behalf shall send a written application to the employer, within such time and in
such form, as may be prescribed, for payment of such gratuity.
(2) As soon as gratuity becomes payable, the Section: 7A
Inspectors
(1) The appropriate Government may, by notification, appoint as many Inspectors, as it deems fit,
for the purposes of this Act.
(2) The appropriate Government may, by general or special order, define the area to which the
authority of an Inspector so appointed shall extend and where two or more Inspectors are appointed
for the same area, also provide, by such order, for the distribution or allocation of work to be
performed by them under this Act.
(3) Every Inspector shall be deemed to be a public servant within the meaning of section 21 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860).
Section: 7B
Powers of Inspectors.
(1) Subject to any rules made by the appropriate Government in this behalf, an Inspector may, for
the purpose of ascertaining whether any of the provisions of this Act or the conditions, if any, of
any exemption granted there under, have been complied with, exercise all or any of the following
powers, namely:
(b) enter and inspect, at all reasonable hours, with such assistants (if any), being persons in the
service of the Government or local or any public authority, as he thinks fit, any premises of or place
in any factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company, shop or other establishment to
which this Act applies, for the purpose of examining any register, record or notice or other
document required to be kept or exhibited under this Act or the rules made there under, or otherwise
kept or exhibited in relation to the employment of any person or the payment of gratuity to the
employees, and require the production thereof for inspection;
(c) examine with respect to any matter relevant to any of the purposes aforesaid, the employer or
any person whom he finds in such premises or place and who, he has reasonable cause to believe, is
an employee employed therein;
(1) Whoever, for the purpose of avoiding any payment to be made by himself under this Act or of
enabling any other person to avoid such payment, knowingly makes or causes to be made any false
statement or false representation shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees or with both.
(2) An employer who contravenes, or makes default in complying with, any of the provisions of this
Act or any rule or order made there under shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which
shall not be less than three months but which may extend to one year, or with fine which shall not
be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or with both:
Provided that where the offence relates to non-payment of any gratuity payable under this Act, the
employer shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than [36] [Six
months but which may extend to two years] unless the court trying the offence, for reasons to be
recorded by it in writing, is of opinion that a lesser term of imprisonment or the imposition 01; a
fine would meet the ends of justice.
Section: 9
Penalties.
(1) Whoever, for the purpose of avoiding any payment to be made by himself under this Act or of
enabling any other person to avoid such payment, knowingly makes or causes to be made any false
statement or false representation shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees or with both.
(2) An employer who contravenes, or makes default in complying with, any of the provisions of this
Act or any rule or order made there under shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which
shall not be less than three months but which may extend to one year, or with fine which shall not
be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or with both:
Provided that where the offence relates to non-payment of any gratuity payable under this Act, the
employer shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than [36] [Six
months but which may extend to two years] unless the court trying the offence, for reasons to be
recorded by it in writing, is of opinion that a lesser term of imprisonment or the imposition 01; a
fine would meet the ends of justice.
Section: 10
Exemption of employer from liability in certain cases.
Where an employer is charged with an offence punishable under this Act, he shall be entitled, upon
complaint duly made by him and on giving to the complainant not less than three clear days notice
in writing of his intention to do so, to have any other person whom he charges as the actual offender
brought before the court at the time appointed for hearing the charge; and if, after the commission
of the offence has been proved, the employer proves to the satisfaction of the court -
(a) that he has used due diligence to enforce the execution of this Act, and
(b) that the said other person committed the offence in question without his knowledge, consent or
connivance, that other person shall be convicted of the offence and shall be liable to the like
punishment as if he were the employer and the employer shall be discharged from any liability
under this Act in respect of such offence:
Section: 13
Protection of gratuity.
No gratuity payable under this Act and no gratuity payable to an employee employed in any
establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop exempted under
section shall be liable to attachment in execution of any decree or order of any civil, revenue or
criminal court.
Section: 14
Act to override other enactments, etc.
The provisions of this Act or any rule made there under shall have effect notwithstanding anything
inconsistent therewith contained in any enactment other than this Act or in any instrument or
contract having effect by virtue of any enactment other than this Act.
Section: 15
Power to make rules.
(1) The appropriate Government may, by notification make rules for the purpose of carrying out the
provisions of this Act.
Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after
it is made, before each House of Parliament while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days
which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the
expiry of the session ii-immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid,
both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule
should not be made, the rule shall, thereafter, have effect only in such modified form or be of no
effect as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without
prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.
In India, the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (Act) requires entities with ten or more employees to
pay gratuity benefit to their employees at the time of termination of employment. The act also
provides that if an entity is covered under the act because its number of employees exceeded ten on
a particular day, it will continue to be covered under the act even if its number of employees fall
below ten subsequently. However, no gratuity is payable to an employee, which terminates its
services to the entity before completing five years of service, if such termination is not due to death
or disablement. Further, the act does not apply to arrangements, which do not constitute an
employer-employee relationship or to employees of the central/state governments governed by
separate rules framed by the government.
According to the act, gratuity payable to an employee is calculated by using the formula
given below:
Last monthly salary x 15 days x completed years of service
_______plus part thereof exceeding six months_______
26 days
If gratuity computed as per the formula above exceeded Rs. 350,000, the entity had an
option to limit maximum gratuity payable to each employee to Rs. 350,000. In practice,
many entities have capped gratuity payable to their employees at the amount fixed under
the act.
Recent developments
The Government has notified the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act 2010 in May
2010. This bill to this amendment was approved by the Cabinet before 31 March 2010.
The amendment raises the ceiling on gratuity payable to employees from the existing Rs.
350,000 to Rs. 1,000,000.
Financial reporting impact
The enactment of this amendment will require entities, which have fixed their maximum
gratuity liability at the ceiling laid down in the act, to pay higher gratuity to their employees.
We believe that the proposed amendment will give rise to the timing issue as to in which
period the provision is required. Given below is our perspective on this issue.
Should the proposed change in the limit be considered in determining gratuity
liability as at 31 March 2010?
Gratuity liability is covered under scope of AS 15 Employee Benefits and is treated as a
defined benefit plan. According to AS 15, the provision for a defined benefit plan is
calculated using the projected unit credit method (PUCM) of actuarial valuation. The
application of PUCM requires an entity to make various financial assumptions such as
future salary increases and changes in benefit levels. Consequently, the proposed change
in the gratuity limit should also be considered for determining defined benefit liability as at
31 March 2010. It does not matter if the bill was an act at the reporting period date, as long
as there is reasonable certainty that the law would be passed.
Appropriate disclosures should be made with regards to the above in the notes to the
financial statements.
Case Laws
Case - 2: A settlement was arrived by agreement between the employer and some workmen
otherwise than in the course of conciliation proceedings. Workmen who were not the parties to the
settlement urged the appropriate government to refer their dispute covered under the above
settlement to Industrial Tribunal. Can the appropriate government make the reference?
Solution: Section 18 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 explains the provisions about “persons on
whom the settlements and awards are binding”. According to Section 18(1), a settlement arrived at
by agreement between the employer and workmen otherwise than in the course of conciliation
proceeding shall be binding on the parties to the agreement. According to Section (2), subject to the
provisions of sub-section (3), an arbitration award which has become enforceable shall be binding
on the parties to the agreement who referred the dispute to arbitration.
In the above problem, a group of employees referred the matter for settlement, and settled the
dispute with the employer, and thereupon obtained the settlement award. The basic principle of the
settlement resembles the principles of the 'Law of Contract' and 'Consent'. The other group of
employees had not given their consent nor participated in the settlement proceedings. Hence they
are bound to settlement as per Section 18. The appropriate government can refer the dispute to the
court of industrial tribunal.
Case – 3:
Brief Facts: On 1-11-1948, 859 night shift operators of the carding and spinning department of the
Carnatic Mills, a public utility industry, stopped work, some at 4 p.m., some at 4-30 p.m., and some
at 5p.m. The stoppage ended at 8 p.m. in both the departments. By 10 p.m., the strike ended
completely. The apparent cause for the strike was that the management of the Mills had expressed
its inability to comply with the request of the workers to declare the forenoon of 1st November 1948
as a holiday for solar eclipse.
The dispute was referred to the Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal found on the evidence and
circumstances of the case that there was concert and combination of the workers in sopping and
refusing to resume work on the night of 1st November. The Tribunal observed that a very large
number of leave applications was put in for various reasons pointed to the concerted action and that
the application given by the workers and their representatives also indicated that they were acting in
combination both in striking and refusing to go back to work on the ground that they were entitled
to leave for the night shift whenever half a day's leave was granted to the day- shift workers. The
Tribunal declared that it was illegal strike.
The worker appealed to the High Court. The High Court reversed the decision of the Tribunal. The
aggrieved company appealed to the Supreme Court.
JUDGMENT: The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Industrial Tribunal, and gave
judgment in favour of the company and allowed the appeal.
PRINCIPLES: (i) The Supreme Court held that the action of the workers on the night in question
amounted to a strike within the definition of the term in Section 2 (q), and as no notice of the same
had been given to the management it was an illegal strike.
(ii) The workers, on strike, therefore, lost the benefit of the holidays that they would have otherwise
got under the leave rules of the Mill;
(iii) Where the decision of the matter in appeal by special leave before the Supreme Court depended
on the construction of the leave rules of the Carnatic Mills which were in accordance with and
similar in terms of the provisions of Charter -IV-A of the Factories Act, 1934 (now Chapter VI of
the Factories Act, 1948).
Judgement: The Supreme Court reversed the order of the Industrial Tribunal and opined that the
wilful and negligent absenteeism from duty could not be treated as immunity from criminal
conspiracy, and it could not be treated as a right of the worker.
While disposing Indian Bank Vs. Federation of Indian Bank Employees' Union and another
(1982), the Madras High Court held in this case that where any act is done by the employee, who is
a trade union member also, which resulted in unlawful activities and which would constitute
cognizable offence under Indian Penal Code or any other special legislation which treat such acts as
cognizable offences, the immunity from criminal conspiracy, would not be available to that
employee.
Case – 5:
Brief Facts: The Maharastra State Road Transport Corporation is owned by that State
Government . There are several unions. Only two unions were recognized under the Maharastra
Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. A complaint
was filed by a trade union, which was not recognized, before the Labour Court. The Union did not
produce any documents showing its recognition. The Labour Court dismissed the complaint. The
Trade union appealed.
Judgement: The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Labour Court.
Principle: i) Their Lordships opined that as per the mandatory instructions of the Act enacted in
Maharastra, the complaint should be filed by the aggrieved worker or by the recognized trade union.
In this case, the complaint was filed by the unrecognized trade union. Hence the complaint was
dismissed.
22. The rule laid down in this case is applicable only in Maharastra, as that State has enacted the
Maharastra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act,
1971 and made necessary provisions for the 'recognition' and issue of 'Certificate of
Recognition' to trade unions in that state.
Case Law – 6: State Bank of India Staff Association and another Vs. State Bank
of India and Others (1996) 4 SSC 378.
Brief Facts: Some of the office-bearers in the trade union were in the trade union were appointed
on temporary basis and were terminated. Even after their termination, they were continuing in the
trade union. An arbitration and conciliation took place between the trade union and the
management, in which the terminated workers participated. The management objected it.
Judgement: The Supreme Court gave judgement in favour of the management holding that
ordinary or temporary members ceasing to be in the employment of the relevant industry, although
eligible to be an office-bearers of the trade union, were not entitled to negotiate with the
management nor is the management under an obligation to negotiate with them.
Point for reference to the above case law: According to the latest Amendment – 2001: A new
Sub section 2 of section 22, which has been introduced after the amendment, stipulates that in other
than unorganized sector unions, all office bearers except not more than one third or five whichever
is less, should be from the industry i.e. outsiders can be office bearers only up to one third of total
office bearers or five whichever is less. For instance, if the Trade Union has 21 office bearers’
posts, not more than 7 can be outsiders. Since 7 is more than 5, only upto 5 [ whichever is less]
office bearers can be outsiders and rest 16 will have to be from the industry itself.
Case Law – 7: GAIL'S Employees Association, Gas Authority of India Ltd., Vs. Chief
Labour Commissioner (Central)
In GAIL'S Employees Association, Gas Authority of India Ltd., Vs. Chief Labour
Commissioner (Central), the Standing orders certified under Sec.5 empowered the management to
detain or ask any number of workmen to come on duty on any national or festival holiday or on any
day. The Delhi High Court held such standing orders are valid. Because the Court held that the
employer in this case was engaged in providing essential services and this power is given to the
management in interest of safety and in interest of continuous operation of the undertaking.
(B) Labour & Industrial Law - Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Definition of workman - Held,
whenever an employer challenges maintainability of industrial dispute on the ground that the
employee was not a workman within the meaning of s. 2(s) of the Act, what the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal was required to consider was whether the person was employed in an
industry for hire or reward for doing manual, unskilled, skilled, operational, technical or clerical
work in an industry - Once the test of employment for hire or reward for doing the specified type of
work was satisfied, the employee would fall within the definition of 'workman' - Further, source of
employment, the method of recruitment, the terms and conditions of employment/contract of
service, the quantum of wages/pay and the mode of payment were not at relevant for deciding
whether or not a person was a workman within the meaning of s. 2(s) of the Act - Definition of
workman also did not make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person
appointed on contract basis - There was nothing in the plain language of s. 2(s) from which it could
be inferred that only a person employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time
job was a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages
or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours was not a workman - Appeal allowed.
S. B. I. vs Hemant Kumar
[ SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 06 Apr 2011]
Labour & Industrial Law - Domestic enquiry - Violation of principles of natural justice -
Respondent Cashier-cum-Clerk allegedly misappropriated cash from appellant bank - Respondent
was charge-sheeted and enquiry proceedings were initiated - Since respondent was absent on
various dates of hearing, enquiry officer passed ex parte order holding that respondent was guilty of
charges - Respondent's departmental appeal was dismissed - Respondent raised an industrial dispute
- Industrial Tribunal directed reinstatement of respondent holding that departmental enquiry
suffered from violation of principles of natural justice - HC upheld Tribunal order in appellant's writ
petition - Whether there was any violation of principles of natural justice in instant case - Held,
principles of natural justice should not be stretched to a point where they would render in-house
proceedings unworkable - Respondent had not appeared for enquiry on two earlier dates and he was
absent on third appointment day also - Respondent adopted dilatory tactics and in-house
proceedings should be conducted expeditiously and without any undue loss of time - Tribunal's
observation that three barren dates in an in-house proceeding did not amount to delay, was
unfortunate - Further, respondent had already tendered two admissions of guilt in writing and one
orally before management witness and there was hardly anything that could be said on his behalf to
repel charges - Tribunal's findings, therefore, were wholly unreasonable and perverse and HC,
unfortunately, did not consider matter properly - Hence, impugned Tribunal and HC orders were set
aside - Appeal allowed.
Brief facts: on 1-11-1948, 859 night shift operators of the carding and spinning
department of the carnatic mills, a public utility industry, stopped work, some at
4p.m.,some at 4.30p.m.,and some at 5p.m. The stoppage ended at 8p.m. in the both the
departments. By 10p.m., the strike ended completely. The apparent cause for the strike
was that the management of the mills had expressed its inability to comply with the
request of the workers to declare the forenoon of 1st November 1948 as a holiday for solar
eclipse.
The dispute was referred to the industrial tribunal. The tribunal found on the evidence and
circumstances of the case that there was a concert and combination of the workers
stopping and refusing to resume work on the night of 1st November. The tribunal observed
that a very large number of leave applications was put in for various reasons pointed to the
concerted action and that the application given by the workers and their representatives
also indicated that they were acting in combination both in striking and refusing to go back
to work on the ground that they were entitled to leave for the night shift whenever half a
day’s leave was granted to the day shift workers. The tribunal declared that it was illegal
strike.
The worker appealed to the high court. The high court reversed the decision of the
tribunal. The aggrieved company appealed to the Supreme Court.
Judgment: the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the industrial tribunal, and gave
judgment in favour of the company and allowed the appeal.
Principles:
i). The supreme court held that the action of the workers on the night in question amounted
to a strike within the definition of the term in section 2 (Q), and as no notice of the same
had been given to the management it was an illegal strike.
ii). The workers, on strike, therefore, last the benefit of the holidays that they would have
otherwise got under the leave rules of the mill.
iii). Where the decision of the matter in appeal by special leave before the supreme court
depended on the construction of the leave rules of the carnatic mills which were in
accordance with and similar in terms of the provisions of chapter IV –A of the factories act
1934.
State bank of India staff association and another Vs. state bank of India
and others(1996)4SSC378.
Brief facts: some of the office bearers in the trade union were in the trade union were
appointed on temporary basis and were terminated. Even after their termination, they were
continuing in the trade union. An arbitration and conciliation took place between the trade
union and the management, in which the terminated workers participated. the
management objected it.
Judgment: The supreme court gave judgment in favour of the management holding that
ordinary or temporary members ceasing to be in the employment of the relavent industry,
although eligible to be an office bearers of the trade union, were not entitled to negotiate
with the management nor is the management under an obligation to negotiate with them.
Point for reference to the above case law: According to the latest amendment -2001: A new sub
section 2 of section 22, which has been introduced after the amendments, stipulates that in other
than unorganized sector unions, all office bearers except not more than one third or five whichever
is less, should be from the industry i.e. outsiders can be office bearers only up to one third of total
office bearers or five whichever is less. For instance if the TU has 21 office bearers posts, not more
than 7 can be outsiders. Since 7 is more than 5, only up to 5 office bearers can be outsiders and rest
16 will have to be from the industry itself.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Anand Kanwar (1993)
III LLJ Raj
Brief facts: The deceased bus driver was the husband of Smt.A nand Kanwar. The Driver died in
an accident. She claimed compensation after the limitation. She convinced the Commissioner that
due to her ill-health, grievance and bereaved, she did not file application within te limitation, and
prayed for condonation. On humanitarian grounds, the Commissioner condoned the delay, and
accepted the claim competition, and after enquiry, he awarded the compensation. The employer
R.S.R.T.C appealed to the High Court raising the objection that the Commissioner had no power to
condone the delay.
Judgement: The Rajasthan High Court gave judgement upholding the decision of the
Commissioner and held that the Commissioner has discretionary power in condoning delay. The
Court further held that if the Commissioner satisfies with the circumstances explained in the
condonation petition, he is empowered to condone the delay.
-------------
The present study concentrates on the observations and recordings made through a
survey on Allsec Technologies. The study is intended to focus on the implementation of
employee legislations at Allsec Technologies. Allsec Technologies is a BPO (Business
Process Outsourcing). A Business process outsourcing (BPO) is a subset of outsourcing
that involves the contracting of the operations and responsibilities of specific business
functions (or processes) to a third-party service provider. Originally, this was associated
with manufacturing firms, such as Coca Cola that outsourced large segments of its supply
chain. In the contemporary context, it is primarily used to refer to the outsourcing of
business processing services to an outside firm, replacing in-house services with labor
from an outside firm. Employee legislation is applicable in all the organizations irrespective
of their nature of work processes. Whether the company belongs to public or private
sector, it has to consider the legislations formulated by the government concerned.
The reason could be that the insecurity is found least in BPOs (only 8%). Women’s level
of satisfaction for the duration of night shift is observed 84%. They face less commuting
problems (4%), are satisfied with their employers (95%) and mental harassment is felt the
least (3%). However the attraction to work in the nightshift due to better pay package is
only 8 %. Only 13.2% women employees working in the night shifts in BPOs face social
problems. As an attractive and most dynamic sector, it is suggested that more benefits
should be provided to nightshift working women to equalize social life and minimize other
problems.
If the BPO sector is covered by the labour laws, it follows that disputes which arise in
the sector should be settled under the relevant industrial disputes legislation. As with employees in
other industrial sectors, BPO employees too have an inalienable right to collective bargaining with
managements. Ranabir Ray Choudhury throws light on the nature and structure of employment in
the BPO industry, call centres, in particular.
A recent study seeks to lay bare the nature and structure of employment in BPO call centres. It
seeks to emphasise that the work conditions in call-centres are different from conventional
industrial moulds. There is no question that the workforce employed in business process
outsourcing (BPO) units should be left out of the purview of the labour laws for the simple
reason that, as of now, there is no legislation which seeks to keep BPO employees out of
the mainstream of the Indian workforce. This apart, if the BPO sector is considered to be a
legitimate contributor to the economy's income-flow — its contribution being included (with
much fanfare) in the foreign exchange earnings of the economy — there is no rational
reason why the basic input behind the contribution should not be included in the accepted,
conventional input-base of the national economy at large.
If the BPO sector is covered by the nation's labour laws, it follows that disputes which arise
in the sector between employees and employers should be settled under the relevant
industrial disputes legislation. If, in fact, the entire issue is so transparent and simple, why,
one may ask, has it become such an important topic of discussion today, the subject
matter of controversy being whether the information technology sector should be
exempted from labour action in the shape of strikes. The immediate provocation for this
controversy is, of course, the CITU action in preventing staff of the info-tech hub in Kolkata
from attending work on September 29, specially when the Left Front Government in West
Bengal had given the strong impression that work at the hub would not be affected, as on
earlier occasions.
As with employees in other industrial sectors in the country, BPO employees too have the
inalienable right to indulge in collective bargaining with managements on any issue directly
or indirectly connected to their workplace. The all-important question is: Why, till now, have
they not had recourse to this procedure for remedial action? Is it because BPOs have
`comfortable' working conditions which negate any struggle or confrontation with
managements, or is it because, there is no effective leadership on the shopfloor as it were,
which can give appropriate shape to the protest?
Since the second query is dependent on the first, the effort here should be to try to
ascertain what exactly are the working conditions like in BPO units. Since the sector is
relatively new in India, there is as yet not much literature to fall back on to throw any
proper light on the subject. Even so, in recent months some rather perceptive attempts
have been made, one of which — associated with the V. V. Giri National Labour Institute in
Noida — seeks to lay bare the nature and structure of employment in BPO call centres in
particular as objectively as possible. Among other things, perhaps the most important point
which this study seeks to emphasise is that the work conditions to be found in call-centres
(which account for 65-70 per cent of the Indian BPO sector) are different from conventional
industrial moulds.
According to a survey that in the service sector, "customers in particular are considered
integral to the work organisation, either due to simultaneous production and use of many
personal services or due to a strong client-led definition and even co-production of the
actual services. This customer-oriented nature of work often challenges the traditional
conceptions of control and coordination, especially those of manager-worker control
relations. Further to this, `informatisation' of work also creates possibilities for novel modes
of conceptualising and organising work, leading to discernible changes in work cultures."
There are widely divergent views on what the nature of call-centre work is really like, but
attention is drawn to a "wider consensus that the work in call centres characterises some
deep-seated contradictions — contradictions of pleasures and pains in the experience of
work, and conflicts arising out of the competing logics of customer orientation and
rationalisation". There is little doubt that work at Indian call centres is "unskilled, repetitive
and monotonous". As the NLI paper says, "the workers are subjected to a work regime,
which is based on a high degree of computer-telephony integration. The use of such
technology, along with use of standard scripts allow the firms to keep the `free time'
between calls to the bare minimum". The system also allows managements "to examine
the performance of the employee quantitatively — average call time, number of calls and
so on, besides allowing the supervisors to listen remotely to the agents' call, with or
without the knowledge of the employee, to ascertain whether the work is being done within
the stipulated norms and standards".
Importantly, the survey draws attention to the surveillance system employed by call-centre
managements which assess "the entire gamut of activities of the agent within the firm,
ranging from their entry to the workplace to an interim break for lunch".
Dwelling on this aspect of work in some detail, it says the "entry of the employees is strictly
restricted to their work area and the common spaces earmarked for recreation and
refreshment. For each entry to and exit from the work bay, the agents have to punch their
electronic identity cards... During the working hours, the agents are directed to observe
punctuality in taking the admissible breaks, which are also tracked continuously, through
computers. The agents are supposed to be logged in and attending calls for a certain
number of hours per day, which prevents them from too many toilet and coffee breaks. For
each break, agents are required to log off, while leaving the work-bay and log in again at
the time of resuming work. Those who are away from the work bay for longer durations or
unable to attend calls for more than certain stipulated minutes are instantaneously warned
through intranet messages".
Basing itself on this premise, the paper has referred to comparisons made by some
commentators with "the situations of nineteenth century prisons or Roman Slave ships",
which has raised the hackles of a whole range of Indian IT personalities. To critics, such
management practices have evoked scenes of call-centres being nothing more than
"`modern sweatshops' or `bright satanic offices', where the exploitation of labour is
ensured through increased rationalisation and Taylorisation of work". The paper also refers
to what it calls the `emotion burden' on call-centre employees which results mainly from
the requirement of employees being expected "to display customer oriented attitudes and
feelings to facilitate a smooth interaction with the distantly placed consumers". As the
paper says, employees "are required to `manufacture' relationships... Quite often, aspects
such as moods of the agents (employees), facial expressions and words are subject to
monitoring. The agents are even found forced to either express some feelings, which they
do not feel or suppress certain feelings, which they genuinely want to share. In both the
cases, the employees find the job depressing and leading to emotional dissonance".
The conclusion is: "Emotional exhaustion adds to the physical and mental strain of the
workers, leading to higher levels of stress and burnout under the electronically monitored
work and tightly bureaucratised work regime".
To temper these adverse effects, call-centre managements (according to the paper)
arrange for "structured socialisation" of the employees such as organising consultative
forums, arranging get-togethers, etc, the main objective of all this however being the
"(striking of) the `right' balance between work and fun, thereby creating a `productively
docile' workforce". There is also the weapon of "illusory empowerment" through the
projection of the image of "superior work, vibrant ambience of workplace, attractive
designations, impressive salary structure", etc, which is meant to enable employees "to
cope with the pressures and pains of emotional labour".
The obvious question to ask is: Why has this happened if working conditions in the Indian
BPO sector have a lot of scope for improvement? Does the prevailing demand-supply
situation have any role to play in the answer? As one outsourcing employee is reported to
have said: "A union would make sense if there was no job security. Here jobs are more,
people are less — companies are trying all means possible to keep employees happy so
that they won't leave". The entire controversy over BPO working conditions, at this
particular point of time when the country is taking rapid strides towards expansion of the
sector, could not have come at a more inopportune moment for the BPO establishment, as
represented by Nasscom.
Company Profile:
Data Collection:
The data regarding the company is collected from the Human Resource Executives of the
company through well organized questionnaire intended to draw the information regarding
the implementation of various employee legislations followed at Allsec Technologies.
The data is also collected from the websites and journals of the company.
The implementations of the Employee Legislations at Allsec are according to the laws
formulated and followed in India. The Company has about 500 employees as its workforce
for various categories. The men and women employees of the company are in equal
proportion. The various legislations followed at Allsec are enlisted below:
The Factories Act.1948, The employment Standing Orders Act,1946 are not observed at
Allsec as it cannot be defined as an Industry according to Indian law.
1.Affiliation: Affiliation means that the unions pay an affiliation fee to the Labour Party; in
return, they and their members receive the privileges of affiliated membership.
2.Mixed economy:Mixed economy is an economic system in which both the state and private
sector direct the economy, reflecting characteristics of both market economies and planned
economies. Most mixed economies can be described as market economies with strong regulatory
oversight, in addition to having a variety of government-sponsored aspects. India is mixed
economy.
3.Statutory provisions: Statutory means pertaining to or of the statute. Statute is the various
laws and Acts formulated by the Govt. and in force at any given time. Statutory provision is the
provisions under any Act or Rules framed thereunder, in force..For example, the rule that a juvenile
cannot be employed in any industry is a statutory provision under a specific law..
11.Trade union: Trade union means any combination whether temporary and permanent,
formed primarily for the purpose of regulating the relations between workmen and employers, or
between workmen and workmen, or between employers and employers, or for imposing restrictive
conditions on the conduct of any trade or business, and includes any federation of two or more trade
unions.
13.Employee: (f) "employee" means any person who is employed for wages in any kind of work
manual or otherwise in or in connection with the work of an establishment and who gets his wages
directly or indirectly from the employer and includes any person(i) employed by or through a
contractor in or in connection with the work of the establishment; (ii) engaged as an apprentice not
being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act 1961 or under the standing orders of the
establishment.
16.Common seal: The registered trade union enjoys a common seal of its own. Its name and
seal cannot be used by others. The common seal and name are its properties.
19.Amalgamation of trade unions: Any two or more registered Trade Unions may
become amalgamated together as one Trade Union with or without dissolution or division
of the funds of such Trade Unions or either or any of them, provided that the votes of at
least one-half of the members of each or every such Trade Union entitled to vote are
recorded, and that at least sixty per cent. of the votes recorded are in favour of the
proposal.
25.Appropriate government: In relation to any industry carried by or under the authority of
the Central government, the Central government will be the appropriate government and in relation
to any industry carried by or under the authority of the State government, the State government will
be the appropriate government.
29.Continuous service:a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is,
for that period, in uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of
sickness or authorized leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a
cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman;
(2) where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of
one year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-
(a) for a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months
preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked
under the employer for not less than-(i) one hundred and ninety days in the case of a
workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii) two hundred and forty days, in any
other case.
30.Industry:“Industry” means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of
employers and includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or industrial
occupation or avocation of workmen;