Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On the basis of the responses to the survey and interview and analysis of
the constitutional and legal provisions as well as jurisprudence, the following can
be concluded:
(1) In the legal community the perspective is that the Court of Appeals
judges.
(2) The ex-justices including the members of the faculty are likely to disagree
(3) But it is interesting to note that among law students they are open to the
Court” and that “the duty to render justice on the part of Supreme Court
can never be frustrated or affected just because the Court of Appeals is
to be dissolved.
(4) These findings can be anticipated, considering that the respondents are
trained in law and legal education with the exception of some law
public. Given more time, the study can be expanded to include the
scope of study.
(5) While in the case of De La Lana the Supreme Court held that the Congress
has the power to abolish, majority of the respondents are against the
Supreme Court.
(6) On the other hand, those who favor abolition are people who are open
minded and believes that even if the Congress abolishes the Court of
may no longer hold true today in view of the provision of the 1987
Appeals would end up being handled by the Supreme Court. That would
unduly burden the High Court. In that situation, Supreme Court will
“ “
- Teehankee